﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Sustainable Development Agenda is a comprehensive plan of action for humanity, the planet and prosperity, which also aims to strengthen peace around the world. The Sustainable Development is a global call to action to end poverty, protect the earth’s environment and climate, and ensure that people everywhere can enjoy peace and prosperity. Renewable energy sources play a vital role in securing sustainable energy with lower emissions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref2">2</xref>] . It is already accepted that renewable energy technologies might significantly cover the electricity demand and reduce emissions. Then, for the last fifteen years, the world has enjoyed renewables generation capacity increases in a double-digit Terawatt-hours range. Although renewables consumption is fast developing in Asia Pacific, Europe and North America, significant coordination efforts are required among stakeholders in sub-Saharan Africans countries such as Cameroon. According to the World Bank, 91% of Cameroon’s urban households had access to electricity in 2016, while in rural areas 21% of households had access [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref4">4</xref>] . Moreover, those of Cameroonians with access experience a lot of severe internal cuts (shedding) of electricity. In order to better respond to these deficits and for a better efficiency of its energy system, Cameroon must develop several other energies, in particular those from renewable sources such as: solar, biomass, micro hydro, wind [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref6">6</xref>] . That is why the State of Cameroon promotes the development of renewables energies, of which wind energy can be an important component. In that situation for this country, it is relevant to study and bring out the results in order to help all project of production of electricity from renewable sources. Indeed, according to data published by the Eastern Regional Water and Energy Delegation in October 2019, the rate of access to electricity in the region is estimated at 17.35%. On the 1331 localities in the region, only 239 are electrified [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>This study aims to estimate the potential of wind energy in the town of Batouri in the East Region of Cameroon. Since the choice and optimal sizing of the appropriate wind turbines for the region of interest depend on a good knowledge of wind speed distribution. For this purpose, the average hourly wind speed data for the period of April 2014 to May 2016 provided by a station located at a height of 10 m in Batouri were used. Weibull distribution with four numerical methods to estimate to estimate the Weibull shape (K) and scale (C) parameters will be used in the analysis. An estimation of the wind density energy will be made afterwards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Site of Study</title><p>Batouri is the town head quarter of the Kadey division in the East Region of Cameroon. It is the second largest municipality in the province after the regional capital Bertoua. It is located on the main (though unpaved) road connecting Bertoua to the Central African Republic. Batouri is at Latitude N at 4˚26' and Longitude E at 14˚43'. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> presents Cameroon’s map with the location of Batouri [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref2">2</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Materials and Data</title><p>Data used for this study has been collected and analyzed by using lots of materials belonging to the Center of Research on Renewable Energy (CRER) of Institute for Geological and Mining Research (IRGM). A weather vane and anemometer installed at a height of 10 meters above the ground, a sensor station and data recovery console, a computer and software Weather link are materials used</p><p>for this study. Matlab software has been used for numerical equation resolution. Wind speed data used was collected during two years and two months with a step of 30 minutes (period from April 2014 to May 2016). Some wind speed data are available in time series format, in which each data point represents either an average wind speed over a time period of 30 min. The frequency distribution of wind speed measured has been classified for an amplitude of 0.2 (the first one being 0 - 1.2 to avoid the very small speed) of wind speed from data collected on the study period.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Weibull Distribution</title><p>The Weibull distribution is a continuous probability distribution that can fit an extensive range of distribution shapes. Like the normal distribution, the Weibull distribution describes the probabilities associated with continuous data. However, unlike the normal distribution, it can also model skewed data. In fact, its extreme flexibility allows it to model both left- and right-skewed data. The Weibull distribution provides a close approximation to the probability laws of many natural phenomena. It has been used to represent wind speed distribution for application in wind load studies for some time. The Weibull distribution function, has two parameters function K and C. The formula for the probability density function of the general Weibull distribution (the probability density function of wind speed v) is:</p><p>f ( v ) = K C &#215; ( v C ) K − 1 &#215; exp ( − ( v C ) K ) (1)</p><p>where: v is the wind speed (m/s).</p><p>C is the Weibull scale parameter (m/s).</p><p>K is the Weibull shape parameter.</p><p>The cumulative distribution function of the velocity v is the integral of the probability density function. Thus,</p><p>F ( v ) = ∫ 0 ∞ f ( v ) d v = 1 − exp ( − ( v C ) K ) (2)</p><p>The average wind velocity of a regime, following the Weibull distribution is given by:</p><p>v m = ∫ 0 ∞ f ( v ) &#215; v d v (3)</p><p>Upon substituting Equation (1) and considering the standard gamma function</p><p>( Γ n = ∫ 0 ∞ exp ( − x ) ⋅ x 1 K d x ), we deduce:</p><p>V m = C &#215; Γ ( 1 + 1 K ) (4)</p><p>The distribution of Weibull is suitable for the description of statistics properties of wind. There are common methods for determining parameters K and C as: Graphical method, Empirical method, Energy pattern factor method, Moment method, Equivalent energy Method, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Determination of Weibull Parameters</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Numerical Methods</title><p>Five methods used to estimate the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution are presented below.</p><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Graphical Method</title><p>The graphical method is achieved through the cumulative distribution function. In this distribution method, the wind speed data are interpolated by a straight line, using the concept of least squares regression [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref15">15</xref>] . By converting the Equation (2) into logarithmic form, the following equation is obtained:</p><p>ln [ − ln ( 1 − F ( v ) ) ] = K &#215; ln ( v ) − K &#215; ln C (5)</p><p>A plot of ln [ − ln ( 1 − F ( v ) ) ] against ln(v) gives a straight line with K as the slope and (K &#215; lnC) as the intercept along the vertical axis.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Empirical Method</title><p>The Empirical method is defined by using average wind speed and standard deviation by following equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref16">16</xref>] :</p><p>K = ( σ v &#175; ) − 1.089 (6)</p><p>C = v &#175; Γ ( 1 + 1 K ) (7)</p><p>σ = [ 1 N − 1 ∑ i = 1 n ( v i − v &#175; ) 2 ] 1 / 2 (8)</p><p>where: v &#175; is the mean wind speed (m/s);</p><p>σ is the standard deviation of the observed data (m/s).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Energy Pattern Factor Method</title><p>The energy pattern factor method is related to the averaged data of wind speed and is defined by the following equations:</p><p>E p f = v 3 &#175; v &#175; 3 (9)</p><p>K = 1 + 3.69 ( E p f ) 2 (10)</p><p>v &#175; = C Γ ( 1 + 1 K ) (11)</p><p>(9) Can be solved numerically or approximately by power density technique using (10) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_4"><title>3.1.4. Moment Method</title><p>In the moment method, the parameters K and C are determined by the following equations:</p><p>v &#175; = c Γ ( 1 + 1 k ) (12)</p><p>σ = c [ Γ ( 1 + 2 k ) − Γ 2 ( 1 + 1 k ) ] 1 / 2 (13)</p><p>where, v &#175; and σ are the mean wind speed the standard deviation of the observed data of the wind speed, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_5"><title>3.1.5. Equivalent Energy Method</title><p>In the equivalent energy method, the parameters k and c are determined using the equations below (14)</p><p>∑ i = 1 n [ W v i − e − { ( v i − 1 ) [ Γ ( 1 + 3 k ) ] 1 3 ( v m 3 ) 1 3 } k + e − { v i [ Γ ( 1 + 3 k ) ] 1 3 ( v m 3 ) 1 3 } k ] 2 = ∑ i = 1 n ( ε v i ) 2 (14)</p><p>c = [ v m 3 Γ ( 1 + 3 k ) ] 1 3 (15)</p><p>where W<sub>vi</sub>, v m 3 and ε v i are respectively observed frequency of the wind speed, the mean of cubic wind speed, and error of the approximation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Performance Model</title><p>There are lots of tests which can be used to analyze the accuracy of the methods estimation of parameters. In this study, root mean square error (RMSE) and the correlation coefficient R<sup>2 </sup>have been used from the following equations:</p><p>R M S E = ( 1 N ∑ i = 1 N ( y i − x i ) 2 ) 1 2 (16)</p><p>R 2 = ∑ i = 1 N ( y i − z ) 2 − ∑ i = 1 N ( y i − x i ) 2 ∑ i = 1 N ( y i − z i ) 2 (17)</p><p>where: N is the number of observations, y<sub>i</sub> is the actual data, x<sub>i</sub> is the predicted data of Weibull distribution, z<sub>i</sub> is the mean wind speed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Wind Energy Density</title><p>The main components that determine the wind energy potential of a site are the energy density and the energy available in the wind regime over some period of time. The available power in the wind flowing at mean speed v through a wind rotor blade with sweep area A at any given site can be estimated as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref21">21</xref>] :</p><p>P ( v ) = 1 2 &#215; ρ &#215; A &#215; v 3 (18)</p><p>where: ρ (kg/m<sup>3</sup>) is the volumic mass of air.</p><p>Then, the power in the wind per unit of area is:</p><p>P D ( v ) = 1 2 &#215; ρ &#215; v 3 (19)</p><p>Using expression (19) with the Weibull probability distribution the wind energy density of a site expressed as,</p><p>E D = ∫ 0 ∞ P D ( v ) &#215; f ( v ) &#215; d v (20)</p><p>Using Equations (1), (4) and (19), Equation (20) simplifies to,</p><p>E D = ρ &#215; C 3 2 &#215; 3 K &#215; Γ ( 3 K ) (21)</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Results</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> presents the mean wind speed from data.</p><p>The Weilbull distribution of the years 2014 2015 and 2016 are respectively represented by Figures 2-4, described by its probability function f(v), versus the mean wind speed.</p><p>Tables 2-4 show the statistical analysis results.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> presents a global rank of numerical methods performance. It is important to note that only one column was enough to rank the method, since the three criteria (RMSE, X<sup>2</sup> and R<sup>2</sup>) gave the same results.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mean wind speed</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Years</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Months</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly mean wind speed (m/s)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="10"  >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >April</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >September</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >October</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >November</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >December</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="13"  >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >January</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >February</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >March</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >April</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >September</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >October</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >November</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >December</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >January</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >February</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >March</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >April</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Weibull parameters and statistical analysis, year 2014</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Numerical Methods</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Weibull parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Statistical tests</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RMSE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Empirical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8434</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0642</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02536</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graphical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6785</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3923</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00322</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05360</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy pattern factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3682</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04414</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moment method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3356</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04632</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equivalent Energy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05495</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Weibull parameters and statistical analysis, year 2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Numerical Methods</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Weibull parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Statistical tests</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RMSE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Empirical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5422</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graphical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9739</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03495</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy pattern factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02404</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moment method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9709</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equivalent Energy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7866</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00079</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02764</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Weibull parameters and statistical analysis, year 2016</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Numerical Methods</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Weibull parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Statistical tests</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RMSE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Empirical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3734</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00341</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05647</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graphical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04770</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy pattern factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9758</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03642</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moment method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0629</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3850</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9706</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equivalent Energy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9725</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03886</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Global rank of statistical performance of numerical methods</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical Methods</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RMSE</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Empirical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5<sup>th</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5<sup>th</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graphical method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4<sup>th</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy pattern factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moment method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4<sup>th</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4<sup>th</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equivalent Energy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5<sup>th</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Results</title><p>Firstly, the statistical analysis presented above shows that the values of the performance tools used namely RMSE, X<sup>2</sup>, and R<sup>2</sup> are very close to each other whatever the digital method used. In addition, viewing Figures 2-4 it appears that two of the methods (Energy Pattern Factor and Equivalent Energy) give curves having a better confusion with the frequency histogram of wind speed measured, consequently giving a better approximation of the parameters K and C. Moreover, from the classification table of performance tools it appears that the Energy Pattern Factor methods has the best performance with the rank 3rd, 1st and 1st 3rd respectively for R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE and X<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>Secondly, for each numerical method, according to the modeling of wind speed by weibull distribution, the values of parameter K has some variation. Its value is included between 3.5499 and 6.1696. The values of C are included between 2.0642 to 2.4659.</p><p>Finally, since the energy pattern factor method has the best performance mainly for the year, then the best approximation of these parameters can be: K = 3.8262 and C = 2.4659.</p><p>The average wind speed is around 2.3 m/s. Since for a suitable installation of conventional horizontal axis wind turbines whose cut-in velocity is about 4 m/s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125922-ref21">21</xref>] , Batouri is not suitable for wind energy. But this speed cannot be negligible for mainly domestical need as lighting, battery charging, radio, small water pumping etc. Especially in dry season in a locality with the rate of access to electricity estimated at 17.35%.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The objective of this study was the modeling of wind speed by Weibull distribution in the intention to evaluate wind energy potential and help for designing small wind energy plant Batouri in Cameroon. A contribution to rural electrification and then to the sustainable development was focus in that area. The Weibull model of wind speed distribution was done through four numerical methods. For each method, the model obtained is effective because all statistical tests showed good performance. The best performance was obtained by energy pattern factor method with parameters K = 3.8262 and C = 2.4659.</p><p>Since the rate of access to electricity in the locality of study is very low, a potential of wind energy with mean wind speed around 2.3 m/s cannot be negligible for domestical need.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pokem, P., Kengne Signe, E.B., Nganhou, J. and Yaouba (2023) Wind Speed and Power Density Analysis for Sustainable Energy in Batouri, East Region of Cameroon. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 11, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2023.116005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.125922-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elie Bertrand, K.S., Abraham, K. and Lucien, M. (2020) Sustainable Energy through Wind Speed and Power Density Analysis in Ambam, South Region of Cameroon. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, Article 176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00176</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antoine, F.N.A., Bertrand, G.T.C., Bertrand, K.S.E. and Blanco, C.J.C. (2020) Sustainable Development around Small-Scale Mining Areas by the Development of Micro Hydro Power: Application Cases in Cameroon. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 8, 36-48. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2020.83003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fawzan, A., James, E.A. and Chris, R.R. (2019) Wind Energy Assessment for NEOM City, Saudi Arabia. Energy Science &amp; Engineering, 8, 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.548</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne Signe, E.B., Tekounegning, O., Hamandjoda, O. and Nganhou, J. (2015) Local Blacksmith’s Activity in the West Region of Cameroon and Their Contribution to the Development of Micro Hydroelectric Power Plants in That Region. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 9, 428-437. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2014.1798</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne Signe, E.B., Hamandjoda, L., Oumarou, H. and Nganhou, J. (2017) Methodology of Feasibility Studies of Micro-Hydro Power Plants in Cameroon: Case of the Micro-Hydro of KEMKEN. Energy Procedia, 119, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne Signe, E.B., Hamandjoda, O., Nganhou, J. and Wegang, L. (2017) Technical and Economic Feasibility Studies of a Micro Hydropower Plant in Cameroon for a Sustainable Development. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 5, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2017.59006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne Signe, E.B., Ooumarou, H., Gubong, T.C. and Fanyep, N.A. (2017) Modeling of Rainfall-Runoff by Artificial Neural Network for Micro Hydro Power Plant: A Case Study in Cameroon. The International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6, 15511-15519.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne Signe, E.B., Hamandjoda, L., Oumarou, H. and Nganhou, J. (2019) Performance in Feasibility Studies of Micro Hydro Power Plants. New Software Development and Application Cases in Cameroon. Energy Procedia, 157, 1391-1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.304</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Afungchui, D. and Aban, C.E. (2014) Analysis of Wind Regimes for Energy Estimation in Bamenda, of the North West Region of Cameroon, Based on the Weibull Distribution. Revue des Energies Renouvelables, 17, 137-147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hicham, B., Ikram, E.A., Abdelmajid, E.B. and Abdelmoumen, D. (2019) Wind Speed Data Analysis Using Weibull and Rayleigh Distribution Functions, Case Study: Five Cities Northern Morocco. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 786-793.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isa, D., Sean, R., Arvind, S. and Craig, J.R. (2018) Evaluating Wind Speed Probability Distribution Models with a Novel Goodness of Fit Metric: A Trinidad and Tobago Case Study. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 9, 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-018-0271-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne Signe, E.B., Kanmogne, A., Emmanuel, G.D. and Meva’a, L. (2019) Comparison of Seven Numerical Methods for Determining Weibull Parameters of Wind for Sustainable Energy in Douala, Cameroon. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 13, 903-915. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-07-2018-0014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kengne Signe, E.B., Ooumarou, H. and Nganhou, J. (2016) Modeling of Characteristics of Wind by Weibull Distribution and Estimation of Wind Energy in Douala, Littoral Region of Cameroon. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 5, 6601-6608. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0505001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kidmo, D.K., Danwe, R., Doka, S.Y. and Djongyang, N. (2015) Statistical Analysis of Wind Speed Distribution Based on Six Weibull Methods for Wind Power Evaluation in Garoua, Cameroon. Rеvuе des Energies Renouvelables, 18, 105-125.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nkongo, A.A., Ebobenow, J. and Afungchui, D. (2016) Wind Energy Potential Assessment of Cameron’s Coastal Regions for the Installation of an Onshorewind Farm. Heliyon, 2, E00187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olaofe, Z.O. (2015) On the Remapping and Identification of Potential Wind Sites in Nigeria. Energy and Power Engineering, 7, 477-499. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2015.710046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Olaofe</surname><given-names> Z.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>Assessment of the Offshore Wind Speed Distributions at Selected Stations in the South-West of Nigeria</article-title><source> International Journal of Renewable Energy Research</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 565</fpage>-<lpage>577</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parajuli, A. (2016) A Statistical Analysis of Wind Speed and Power Density Based on Weibull and Rayleigh Models of Jumla, Nepal. Energy and Power Engineering, 8, 271-282. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2016.87026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paulo Alexandre, C.R., Ricardo, C.S., Carla, F.A. and Maria Eugênia, V.S. (2012) Comparison of Seven Numerical Methods for Determining Weibull Parameters for Wind Energy Generation in the Northeast Region of Brazil. Applied Energy, 89, 395-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ucar, A. and Balo, F. (2009) Evaluation of Wind Energy Potential and Electricity Generation at Six Locations in Turkey. Applied Energy, 86, 1864-1872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125922-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hulio, Z.H., Jiang, W. and Rehman, S. (2017) Technical and Economic Assessment of Wind Power Potential of Nooriabad, Pakistan. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7, Article No. 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0137-9</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>