<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2023.146042</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-125730</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Beneficial Effect of &lt;i&gt;Trichoderma&lt;/i&gt; spp. in Seed Treatment of Four Maize (&lt;i&gt;Zea mays&lt;/i&gt; L.) Genotypes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Luis Arispe-Vázquez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abiel</surname><given-names>Sánchez-Arizpe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daniel</surname><given-names>Alejandro Cadena-Zamudio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ma.</surname><given-names>Elizabeth Galindo-Cepeda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>David</surname><given-names>Heriberto Noriega-Cantú</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oscar</surname><given-names>Guadalupe Barrón-Bravo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leslie</surname><given-names>Carnero-Avilés</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Juan</surname><given-names>Mayo-Hernández</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Susana</surname><given-names>Elizabeth Ramírez-Sánchez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adriana</surname><given-names>Antonio-Bautista</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Delicias, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Altamira, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Departamento de Parasitología, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Departamento de Fitomejoramiento, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Iguala de la Independencia, Guerrero, México</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>625</fpage><lpage>637</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Maize is the main crop for Mexicans; however, it is affected by species of fungi causing ear rot. This research aimed to evaluate the effect of 
  T. asperellum T11, 
  T. harzianum T1 4 y 
  T. longibrachiatum T1 40 on some agronomic variables of four maize genotypes. The seeds of the genotypes H-515, Zapata 7, and H-507 were treated with a suspension of 
  Trichoderma spp. to 1 &#215; 10
  <sup>8</sup> spores mL
  <sup>-1</sup>, using a control (untreated seed), and Benomyl as chemical control. The planting was in Morelos, in a completely random block design with a factorial arrangement. The ear rot was natural. Data were obtained at the end of the crop cycle 
  and processed in SAS 9.4
  <sup>&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/sup&gt;</sup>
  . H-515 genotype had the greatest effect on the
   treatment of maize seeds with Trichoderma spp. (5.562 kg); T. asperellum T11 was the strain that stood out with a mean yield of 50 ears in an area of 16 m<sup>2</sup> of 4.904 kg, and control of 4.448 kg. Our results are an economic option for farmers to contemplate the use of Trichoderma and obtain its benefits.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Seeds</kwd><kwd> Treatment</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Trichoderma asperellum&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Ear Rot</kwd><kwd> Yield</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The relationship between Mexicans and Zea mays L. (Poaceae) maize is millenary and is intimately associated with the evolution of Mesoamerican civilizations, it has been the basis of our diet, and its use diversifies from grains and fodder, which constitutes the basis for the elaboration of a vast number of foods, to the pharmaceutical and manufacturing industries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref1">1</xref>] . The main maize producers worldwide are the United States (383,943,000 Mt), China (272,552,000 Mt), Brazil (88,461,943 Mt), and Mexico ranks seventh (27,503,477.88 Mt) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Var&#243;n and Sarria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref3">3</xref>] mentioned that the main diseases that attack the maize crops in Mexico are of fungal origin, spread throughout the country and their appearance is subject to the environmental conditions that favor the infection and multiplication of the pathogen, as well as the source of the inoculum and the susceptibility of the genotypes. In Mexico, the main genus of fungi involved in ear rot are: Diplodia Fries (Botryosphaeriaceae), Gibberella Link, Fusarium Link (Nectriaceae) y Aspergillus P. Micheli ex Haller (Trichocomaceae) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref4">4</xref>] y Penicillium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Rios-Velasco et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref6">6</xref>] alluded that Biological Control (BC) represents an alternative to chemical control, based on the use of native antagonists, an aspect that confers it to be environmentally friendly and sustainable. Trichoderma genus contains species of fungi belonging to the order Hypocreales of the division Ascomycota [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref7">7</xref>] , associated with soil ecosystems with a worldwide distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref8">8</xref>] , species of this genus are often used as biocontrol agents against phytopathogenic fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref10">10</xref>] , note that the biological control of fungal phytopathogens is often more variable in efficacy compared to the suppression of diseases achieved through the use of conventional pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref10">10</xref>] . That being said, the use of this species for biocontrol is an alternative for sustaining high production with low ecological impact on different agricultural production systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref11">11</xref>] , so BC is considered one of the important practices for pest and disease management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Inoculation of seeds with Trichoderma spores in suspension or powder is probably the most economical and extensive method for the biocontrol of maize ear rot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref13">13</xref>] . Argumedo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref14">14</xref>] reported on the species of fungi that belong to the genus Trichoderma, these have been fully characterized by having an application in the agricultural field, mainly for the biological control of other pathogenic organisms that attack crops, however, studies on their behavior and effect in contaminated terrestrial and aquatic environments have been scarcely studied. Furthermore, Trichoderma spp. promotes plant growth, improves fruit quality, as well as potentiating crop yields through the production of phytohormones while also promoting the availability of phosphates and other minerals necessary for plant metabolism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref15">15</xref>] , due to these reasons, several species of this genus are used as biofertilizers and phytostimulators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref17">17</xref>] , therefore, this research aimed to evaluate the effect of T. asperellum T11, T. harzianum T1 4 and T. longibrachiatum T1 40 on some agronomic variables of four genotypes.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Location</p><p>The field research was carried out in the municipality of Tepalcingo, Morelos, Mexico (18˚37'39.9&quot;N and 98˚52'08.0&quot;W), while the laboratory stage was carried out in the Phytopathology laboratory at Universidad Autonoma Agraria Antonio Narro (UAAAN) (25˚21'16.0&quot;N 101˚01'51.7&quot;W).</p><p>Trichoderma strains under study</p><p>The strains used in this study were T. asperellum T11, T. harzianum T1 4, T. longibrachiatum T1 40.</p><p>Maize genotypes</p><p>In the present research, the commercial genotypes (hybrids) H-515, Zapata 7, H-507 and a native at Tepalcingo, Morelos, which is typically used by the community for its production and consumption, were used.</p><p>Treatment of Trichoderma spp. on maize seeds</p><p>The genotypes were hydrated with distilled water for 12 h, and 500 seeds were used per replicate, giving a total of four replicates per genotype and strain. To achieve spore adhesion to the seed, they were immersed in an aqueous solution of molasses at 5% for 5 min, the excess was removed and 1 L of suspension of Trichoderma spp. spores were added at 1 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> mL<sup>−1</sup> spores per replicate for 10 min. Benomyl was used as a chemical control and 2 g per 1 kg of seed L<sup>−1</sup> and water for 10 min was applied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), coupled with control (untreated seeds).</p><p>Planting the genotypes</p><p>The planting of the 500 seeds per replicate of each treatment was carried out in a random block design and was on August 20, 2017, with a temperature of 17.76˚C - 28.83˚C and a relative humidity of 81.60% (humidity in the environment), in an irrigation system. Planting was done in furrows 17 m long by 80 cm wide, with a distance between furrows of 80 cm and between plants of 40 cm, sowing two seeds per stroke, at a depth of 3 cm.</p><p>Harvest</p><p>The harvest in Tepalcingo was done on December 28, 2017, selecting 50 corn</p><p>plants at random per replicate and harvesting only the main ear per plant, which were put in the sun for drying as the population normally does and the moisture content was verified every two days using a digital grade moisture meter (Lds-1g), until the maize presented 14% humidity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Evaluated variables</p><p>At the end of the production cycle, the incidence and severity of maize rot was evaluated, as well as the height and diameter of the stem of 50 maize plants of each genotype by means of a flexometer and the yield of 50 ears per replicate, (only the main ear per plant and shell), done by means of an analytical scale.</p><p>Statistical analysis</p><p>Data were evaluated in a random block analysis with a factorial arrangement, with factor A as genotypes and factor B as treatments, employing four levels in factor A and five levels in factor B, with four replicates per treatment, analyzing data in the STATISTICAL program SAS version 9.4<sup>&#174;</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref18">18</xref>] , the separation of means done by the Tukey test (p = 0.1). Moreover, a correlation test of variables under study was done in the R software using the Pearson test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows that there is no statistical difference between the treatments, however, the strains of Trichoderma applied to the seed showed an effect similar to the rest of the treatments (Tukey p &lt; 0.01). The genotype H-515 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) presented the greatest effect in the treatment with the Trichoderma species (5.562 kg), and T. asperellum T11 was the strain that stood out with an average yield of 50 ears in an area of 16 m<sup>2</sup> of 4.904 kg, in other words, the inoculation of this strain presented 0.456 g (10.25%) more than the control, it</p><p>probably seems significant, however, if we interpolate it to 1 ha, we would have a yield of 285 kg more with the application of this species of Trichoderma, while the native presented the lowest yield (2.750 kg).</p><p>If we extrapolate our results obtained to one ha with the same management and number of plants as normally sowed by producers in the region (60,000 plants/ha), we would have the H-515 genotype inoculated to seed with the strain T. asperellum T11, we would reach 5884.80 t/ha (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), if we compare it with the control, which would present 5337.60 t/ha, we would have a difference of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of means of Factors A and B in grain yield</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genotype<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (kg/50 ears)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatments<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (kg/50 ears)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield<sup>3</sup> (t/ha)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-515</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.562 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Benomyl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.693 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5631.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zapata 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.433 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.821 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5785.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-507</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.081 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.662 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5594.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Native</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.750 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.904 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5884.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.448 A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5337.60</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Same letters are not statistically different according to Tukey’s test at 0.01 probability, <sup>1</sup> = Factor A (genotypes), <sup>2</sup> = Factor B (treatments), <sup>3</sup>Yield extrapolated per ha.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Means of the yield obtained from each treatment by genotype under study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >G1</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >G2</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >G3</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >G4</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;SD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73549</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21524</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25817</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10489</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13711</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58744</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15944</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85444</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14993</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T = Treatments; 1 = Control, 2 = Benomyl, 3 = T. asperellum, 4 = T. harzianum, 5 = T. longibrachiatum; G1 = H-515, G2 = Zapata 7, G3 = H-507, G4 = Control; R = Yield; &#177;SD = Standard Deviation.</p><p>547.20 kg, regularly the price of corn per kg in the study area is $MX 5.00 to 6.00, that is, if we take the average ($MX 5.50), the farmer would have a profit of $MX 3009.60.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, we can see the variables that correlated with each other according to Pearson, the values according to this test are from −1 to 1, meaning the closer to 1 the correlation is stronger. In other words, if one variable increases or decreases the other tends to present the same effect, for example, the strongest correlations they obtained were between incidence and severity, and stem thickness and performance with r-values of 0.85 and 0.8, respectively. However, other negative correlations were presented as positive (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Global food security is of great importance, so an increase in investment in agricultural research and development is necessary to increase the productivity of the world’s farms, especially in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref20">20</xref>] . Among the most important microorganisms are the bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas Migula (Pseudomonadaceae) and Bacillus Cohn (Bacillaceae) and fungi of the genus Gliocladium Corda and Trichoderma Persoon (Hypocreaceae), the latter is the most used for the control of an important group of soil pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref21">21</xref>] . This genus includes cosmopolitan, free-living or mycoparasite fungi that are very common in soil and root ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref22">22</xref>] . By way of explanation, Trichoderma is probably the more beneficial, more versatile fungus that abounds in soils and there are more than</p><p>100 species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Note that in some maize stalks (in the interior), the strain of Trichoderma with which the seed was treated was developed (especially those treated with T. asperellum T11) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). In addition, some species of this genus have direct effects on plants, increasing their potential for growth and nutrient absorption, fertilizer efficiency, a higher rate and percentage of seed germination, and stimulating plant defense against biotic and abiotic damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Buysens et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref25">25</xref>] mentioned that Trichoderma spp. has also been used in agriculture as a biofertilizer to increase both plant growth and crop yields. Several species of Trichoderma are associated with the rhizosphere of plants, meaning they can promote the growth and development of plants, by the production of auxins and gibberellins. Moreover, they can also produce organic acids such as gluconic, fumaric, and citric acid, which can lower the pH of the soil and promote the solubilization of phosphates, magnesium, iron and manganese, which are vital for the metabolism of the plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>Camargo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref27">27</xref>] reported that the application of commercial Trichoderma sp. in the cultivation of pea Pisum sativum L. (Fabaceae) significantly improved its growth and development, influencing physiological variables such as germination, leaf area, dry weight of the root, fresh weight of the root, dry weight of the aerial part, fresh weight of the aerial part and length of root, favoring the productive yield of the crop, when applying the same treatment to the seed. However, the seeds of this experiment were exposed to spore suspensions for 24 h and in this study, the seeds were kept only for 10 min, presenting no significant difference in the variables of height, diameter and yield. Kamilova et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref28">28</xref>] reported that in previous studies carried out in the greenhouse, treating the seeds of a plant with a suspension of spores of Trichoderma spp. increased performance. Nevertheless, Tlapal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref29">29</xref>] informed that when T. harzianum and other bacteria-based treatments were inoculated, no significant differences were found in plant height, in our research, plant height was correlated with stem thickness, as well as corn yield (r = 0.59). On the other hand, Xue et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref30">30</xref>] reported that with the inoculation of Trichoderma spp. in wheat crop, the yield</p><p>increased by 11.0% compared to the control, L&#243;pez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref31">31</xref>] also reported that some of the treatments where Trichoderma was applied led to a greater growth of the maize plant.</p><p>In addition, it should be noted that producers can obtain these products made from the species of this genus at affordable prices (approximately from $MX 300.00). Some species have the ability to increase nutrient availability and crop yields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref32">32</xref>] , However, interactions between microorganisms and the plant have a better response when these are affected by abiotic factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref33">33</xref>] . On the other hand, Strange and Scott [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref34">34</xref>] commented that despite the continuous release of resistant cultivars and chemical fungicides, it is estimated that 10% of crop yields are lost due to fungal diseases and in this research due to the use of fungicides 0.245 g (5.50%) where more than the control was obtained.</p><p>Chemical fertilizers have played an important role in improving crop yields in intensified agriculture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref35">35</xref>] , also modern agriculture has become dependent on the use of chemical pesticides to control phytopathogenic organisms, which has led to resistance to pests. Likewise, improper and indiscriminate applications of pesticides have been subject to numerous restrictions in several countries where there is strong pressure from consumers who demand the limitation of the use of these products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref36">36</xref>] . Correspondingly, the genus Trichoderma forms sclerotia as resistance structures, which survive in the soil and are difficult to destroy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref37">37</xref>] . The use of Trichoderma spp., it is not only an act of respect for the environment, but also one of the most effective actions against other genera of phytopathogenic soil fungi such as Fusarium, Pythium Pringsheim (Pythiaceae), Rhizoctonia solani J.G. K&#252;hn (Ceratobasidiaceae), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary (Sclerotiniaceae) and Scletotium rolfsii Sacc. (Atheliaceae) and aerial phytopathogens like Botrytis P. Micheli ex Haller (Sclerotiniaceae). It is even extremely effective against species of phytoparasitic nematodes such as Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood and M. incognita (Kofold &amp; White) Chitwood (Meloidogynidae) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref38">38</xref>] , correspondingly it is advisable to apply Trichoderma in crops, not only for the control of phytopathogens, but also for the benefits in the development and yield of crops. In actuality, it is easier to carry out this process, since several products are on the market based on mushrooms of the genus Trichoderma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref40">40</xref>] , however, in the application of Trichoderma in the field, several important aspects that allow its adequate expression must be taken into account, which is related to the host plant interaction, susceptible phytopathogen, favorable environment (soil temperature, humidity, presence of oxygen, pH), soil conditions (structure, content of organic matter and nutrients) and time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref41">41</xref>] . Another advantage is that some species of Trichoderma are capable of degrading pesticides due to their enzymatic activity and biochemical capacity, this allows us to glimpse the potential of application of this genus in the bioremediation of contaminated sites, thus having an ecological relevance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><p>On the other hand, fumonisins, mainly produced by Fusarium verticillioides (formerly F. moniliforme) (Saccardo) Nirenberg (Nectriaceae) causative agent of ear rot by Fusarium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref46">46</xref>] , from which the name of the toxin is derived, frequently contaminated grains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref47">47</xref>] produce fumonisins B1, B2, B3 and B4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref48">48</xref>] . Causing in animals, decreased feed conversion, decreased appetite, diarrhea, weakness and increased mortality (poultry), decreased intake, and milk production (ruminants), as well as equine leukoencephalomalacia (horses), leukoencephalomalacia, cerebral hemorrhages and nephrotoxic alterations (rabbits), esophageal cancer, liver tumors, defects in neural tube development while also causing esophageal cancer in humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref49">49</xref>] . B1 fumonisin is a possible carcinogen for humans (IARC Group 2B) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref50">50</xref>] and still holds its place as the least resistant maize in the formation of fumonisins although, the production of fumonisins is influenced by the seed variety used for cultivation by the different fertilizer formulations, as well as variations in storage conditions and environmental characteristics such as temperature, humidity and precipitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref52">52</xref>] . Some Trichoderma species reduce fumonisin levels, for example: Chandra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref53">53</xref>] reported that T. harzianum spores as a powder and liquid formulation, under field conditions, seed treatment and foliar spraying, alone and in combination reduced F. verticillioides infection in three maize genotypes and fumonisin levels. These species present different modes or mechanisms of action as competition for the substrate, mycoparasitism, antibiosis, deactivation of pathogen enzymes, and induced resistance, among others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125730-ref54">54</xref>] . The application of Trichoderma has a positive effect on maize yield and T. asperellum was the species with the greatest effect on maize genotypes. The H-515 genotype presented the greatest effect of the Trichoderma species with the seed treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Arispe-V&#225;zquez, J.L., S&#225;nchez-Arizpe, A., Cadena-Zamudio, D.A., Galindo-Cepeda, Ma.E., Noriega-Cant&#250;, D.H., Barr&#243;n-Bravo, O.G., Carnero-Avil&#233;s, L., Mayo-Hern&#225;ndez, J., Ram&#237;rez-S&#225;nchez, S.E. and Antonio-Bautista, A. (2023) The Beneficial Effect of Trichoderma spp. in Seed Treatment of Four Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 14, 625-637. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2023.146042</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.125730-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venegas, G.M.R.S. (2016) Producción y Comercialización del Maíz en México, Earertura de Riesgo con Derivados. 21th Encuentro Nacional sobre Desarrollo Regional en México, Mérida, 15-18 November 2016, 2-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAOSTAT (Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura) (2020) Crops and Livestock Products.  
https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varón, D.A.F. and Sarria, V.G.A. (2007) Enfermedades del maíz y su manejo. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA), Bogotá, 10 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dupont (Dupont Corporation) (2014) Pudrición de mazorca. 1-2.  
https://www.pioneer.com/CMRoot/International/Mexico_Intl/Agronomia/Articulos_PDF/CM_7B_PUDRICION_MAZORCA_2014.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">PDL (Plant Disease Library) (2018) Pudrición de la mazorca por Penicillium y Fusarium. https://plantix.net/es/library/plant-diseases/100053/penicillium-ear-rot</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rios-Velasco, C., Caro-Cisneros, J.M., Berlanga-Reyes, D.I., Ruiz-Cisneros, M.F., Ornelas-Paz, J.J., Salas-Marina, M.A., Villalobos-Pérez, E. and Guerrero-Prieto, V.M. (2016) Identification and Antagonistic Activity in Vitro of Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma spp. Isolates against Common Phytopathogenic Fungi. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 34, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1507-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kredics, L., Antal, Z., Dóczi, I., Manczinger, L., Kevei, F. and Nagy, E. (2003) Clinical Importance of the Genus Trichoderma. Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica, 50, 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1556/AMicr.50.2003.2-3.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Druzhinina, I.S., Seidl-Seiboth, V., Herrera-Estrella, A., Horwitz, B.A., Kenerley, C.M., Monet, E., Mukherjee, P.K., Zeilinger, S., Grigoriev, I.V. and Kubicek, C.P. (2011) Trichoderma: The Genomics of Opportunistic Success. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9, 749-759. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2637</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malmierca, M.G., McCormick, S.P., Cardoza, R.E., Monte, E., Alexander, N.J. and Gutiérrez, S. (2015) Trichodiene Production in a Trichoderma harzianum erg1-Silenced Strain Provides Evidence of the Importance of the Sterol Biosynthetic Pathway in Inducing Plant Defense-Related Gene Expression. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 28, 1181-1197. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-06-15-0127-R</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez, E., Rubio, M.B., Cardoza, R.E., Gutiérrez, S., Bettiol, W., Monte, E. and Hermosa, R. (2015) The Importance of Chorismate Mutase in the Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma parareesei. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article 1181.  
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01181</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harman, G.E., Obregon, M.A., Samuels, G.J. and Lorito, M. (2010) Changing Models for Commercialization and Implementation of Biocontrol in the Developing and the Developed World. Plant Disease, 94, 928-939.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-8-0928</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brimner, T.A. and Boland, G.J. (2003) A Review of the Non-Target Effects of Fungi Used to Biologically Control Plant Diseases. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 100, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00200-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stefanova</surname><given-names> N.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Introducción y eficacia del biocontrol de fitopatógenos con Trichoderma spp. en Cuba</article-title><source> Instituto de Investigaciones de Sanidad</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 75</fpage>-<lpage>79</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Argumedo, D.R., Alarcón, A., Ferrera, C.R. and Pe&amp;#241;a, C.J.J. (2009) El género fúngico Trichoderma y su relación con contaminantes orgánico e inorgánico. Microbiología, 25, 257-259.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, P. K., and Gothalwal, R. (2017) Trichoderma: A Potent Fungus as Biological Control Agent. In: Singh, J. and Seneviratne, G., Eds., Agro-Environmental Sustainability, Springer, Cham, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49724-2_6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Di Mattia, E., El-Nakhel, C. and Cardarelli, M. (2015) Co-Inoculation of Glomus intraradices and Trichoderma atroviride Acts as a Biostimulant to Promote Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Vegetable Crops. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95, 1706-1715.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6875</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M.Y., Haque, M.M., Molla, A.H., Rahman, M.M. and Alam, M.Z. (2017) Antioxidant Compounds and Minerals in Tomatoes by Trichoderma-Enriched Biofertilizer and Their Relationship with the Soil Environments. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16, 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61350-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS (SAS Institute) (2012) SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Software Version 9.4. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Cary.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R (R Core Team) (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fuglie, K. (2016) The Growing Role of the Private Sector in Agricultural Research and Development World-Wide. Global Food Security, 10, 29-38.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.07.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernández-Larrea, V.O. (2001) Microorganismos antagonistas para el control Fitosanitario. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Ense&amp;#241;anza (CATIE), Cartago, 6-100. http://www.sidalc.net/repdoc/a2120e/a2120e.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harman, G., Howell, C., Viterbo, A., Chet, I. and Lorito, M. (2004) Trichoderma Species—Opportunistic, Avirulent Plant Symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro797</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torres-De la Cruz, M., Ortiz-García, C.F., Bautista-Mu&amp;#241;oz, C., Ramírez-Pool, J.A., ávalos-Contreras, N., Cappello-García, S. and De la Cruz-Pérez, A. (2015) Diversidad de Trichoderma en el agroecosistema cacao del estado de Tabasco, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 86, 947-961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2015.07.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shoresh, M., Harman, G. and Mastouri, F. (2010) Induced Systemic Resistance and Plant Responses to Fungal Biocontrol Agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 48, 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114450</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buysens, C., César, V., Ferrais, F., de Boulois, H.D. and Declerck, S. (2016) Inoculation of Medicago sativa Cover Crop with Rhizophagus irregularis and Trichoderma harzianum Increases the Yield of Subsequently-Grown Potato under Low Nutrient Conditions. Applied Soil Ecology: A Section of Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 105, 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, V., Salwan, R. and Sharma, P.N. (2017) The Comparative Mechanistic Aspects of Trichoderma and Probiotics: Scope for Future Research. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 100, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.07.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Camargo</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> David F. and ávila</surname><given-names> E.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>Efectos del Trichoderma sp. sobre el crecimiento y desarrollo de la arveja (Pisum sativum L.)</article-title><source> Ciencia y Agricultura</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 91</fpage>-<lpage>100</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamilova, F., Kravchenko, L.V., Shaposhnikov, A.I., Azarova, T., Makarova, N. and Lugtenberg, B. (2006) Organic Acids, Sugars, and L-Tryptophane in Exudates of Vegetables Growing on Stonewool and Their Effects on Activities of Rhizosphere Bacteria. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions: MPMI, 19, 250-256.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-19-0250</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tlapal, B.B., González, H.H., Zavaleta, M.E., Sánchez, G.P., Mora, A.G. and Nava, D.C. (2014) Colonización de Trichoderma y Bacillus en Plántulas de Agave tequilana Weber, var. Azul y el Efecto Sobre la Fisiología de la Planta y Densidad de Fusarium. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 32, 61-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xue, A.G., Guo, W., Chen, Y., Siddiqui, I., Marchand, G., Liu, J. and Ren, C. (2017) Effect of Seed Treatment with Novel Strains of Trichoderma spp. on Establishment and Yield of Spring Wheat. Crop Protection, 96, 97-102.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López, Y., Pineda, J. B., Hernández, A. and Ulacio, D. (2010) Efecto diferencial de seis aislamientos de Trichoderma sobre la severidad de Rhizoctonia solani, desarrollo radical y crecimiento de plantas de maíz. Bioagro, 22, 37-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erazo, J., Pastor, N., Giordano, F., Reynoso, M., Rovera, M. and Torres, A. (2020) Solubilización de fosfatos por Trichoderma harzianum ITEM 3636 y su efecto en plantas de maní.  
http://www.ciacabrera.com.ar/docs/JORNADA%2035/17-Erazo%20-Solublizaicion%20de%20fosfatos%20por%20Trichoderma.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadeem, S.M., Ahmadb, M., Zahirc, Z.A., Javaidd, A. and Ashraf, M. (2014) The Role of Mycorrhizae and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Improving Crop Productivity under Stressful Environments. Biotechnology Advances, 32, 429-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strange, R.N. and Scott, P.R. (2005) Plant Disease: A Threat to Global Food Security. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 4, 83-116.  
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.113004.133839</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ju, X.T., Kou, C.L., Zhang, F.S. and Christie, P. (2006) Nitrogen Balance and Groundwater Nitrate Contamination: Comparison among Three Intensive Cropping Systems on the North China Plain. Environmental Pollution, 143, 117-125.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alvarado</surname><given-names> S.L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Ulacio</surname><given-names> D.O.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Sanabria</surname><given-names> M.Ch. and Jiménez M.T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Compatibilidad in Vitro de extractos vegetales y Trichoderma harzianum y su efecto en el crecimiento de Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. y Sclerotium cepivorum BERK</article-title><source> Boletín del Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas</source><volume> 45</volume>,<fpage> 217</fpage>-<lpage>236</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cardona</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>Distribución vertical de esclerocios de Macrophomina phaseolina en un suelo infestado naturalmente en el estado Portuguesa</article-title><source> Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía</source><volume> 23</volume>,<fpage> 285</fpage>-<lpage>293</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kopert (2021) &amp;#191;Por qué utilizar especies de Trichoderma es una excelente idea para proteger las raíces de tus cultivos? Kopert, Querétaro. 
https://www.koppert.mx/noticias-item/por-que-utilizar-especies-de-trichoderma-es-una-excelente-idea-para-proteger-las-raices-de-tus-cultivos/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Monte</surname><given-names> E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Understanding Trichoderma: Between Biotechnology y Microbial Ecology Int</article-title><source> Microbiology: The Official Journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>4</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ranasingh, N., Saurabh, A. and Nedunchezhiyan, M. (2006) Use of Trichoderma in Disease Managemant. Orissa Review, 63, 68-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Villegas</surname><given-names> A.M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Trichoderma Pers. Características generales y su potencial biológico en la agricultura sostenible</article-title><source> Fitotecnia</source><volume> 87</volume>,<fpage> 182</fpage>-<lpage>189</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsumura, F. and Bousch, G.M. (1968) Degradation of Insecticides by a Soil Fungus Trichoderma viride. Journal of Economic Entomology, 61, 610-612.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/61.3.610</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, W.H. (1995) Forest Occurrence of Trichoderma Species: Emphasis on Potential Organochlorine (Xenobiotic) Degradation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 32, 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1995.1100</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Logrieco, A., Mulè, G., Moretti, A. and Bottalico, A. (2002) Toxigenic Fusarium Species and Mycotoxins Associated with Maize Ear Rot in Europe. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 108, 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020679029993</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chandra Nayaka, S., Udaya Shankar, A.C., Reddy, M.S., Niranjana, S.R., Prakash, H.S., Shetty, H.S. and Mortensen, C.N. (2009) Control of Fusarium verticillioides, Cause of Ear Rot of Maize, by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Pest Management Science, 65, 769-775. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1751</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arispe-Vázquez, J.L., Hernández-Juárez, A., Castro del ángel, E., Aguirre-Uribe, L.A., Cerna Chávez, E. and Ochoa Fuentes, Y.M. (2023) Fusarium Species in Maize Grains and Stems (Zea mays L.) from Subsistence and Commercial Systems. Nova Scientia, 15, 1-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blacutt, A.A., Gold, S.E., Voss, K.A., Gao, M. and Glenn, A.E. (2018) Fusarium verticillioides: Advancements in Understanding the Toxicity, Virulence, and Niche Adaptations of a Model Mycotoxigenic Pathogen of Maize. Phytopathology, 108, 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-17-0203-RVW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Proctor, R.H., Plattner, R.D., Desjarins, A.E., Busman, M., and Butchko, A. E. (2006.) Fumonisin Production in the Maize Pathogen Fusarium verticillioides: Genetic Basis of Naturally Occurring Chemical Variation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 2424-2430. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0527706</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marasas, W.F.O., Miller, J.D., Riley, R.T. and Visconti, A. (2000) Environmental Health Criteria for Fumonisin B1. World Health Organization, Geneva, 150 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) (2002) Some Traditional Herbal Medicines, Some Mycotoxins, Naphthalene and Styrene. IARC Monographs, 82, 301-366.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">David-Miller, J. (2001) Factors That Affect the Occurrence of Fumonisin. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109, 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s2321</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ari&amp;#241;o, A., Herrera, M., Juan, T., Estopa&amp;#241;an, G., Carrami&amp;#241;ana, J.J., Rota, C. and Herrera, A. (2009) Influence of Agricultural Practices on the Contamination of Maize by Fumonisin Mycotoxins. Journal of Food Protection, 72, 898-902.  
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.4.898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chandra Nayaka, S., Niranjana, S.R., Uday Shankar, A.C., Niranjan Raj, S., Reddy, M.S., Prakash, H.S. and Mortensen, C.N. (2010) Seed Biopriming with Novel Strain of Trichoderma harzianum for the Control of Toxigenic Fusarium verticillioides and Fumonisins in Maize. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 43, 264-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400701803879</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125730-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Infante, D., Martínez, B., González, N. and Reyes, Y. (2009) Mecanismos de acción de Trichoderma frente a hongos fitopatógenos. Revista de Protección Vegetal, 24, 14-21.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>