<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1110227</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-125549</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Study on Job Satisfaction of Employees in Karnali Academy of Health Science
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shandiya</surname><given-names>Chaulagain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nirmala</surname><given-names>Kumari Pahadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sarswoti</surname><given-names>Gautam Bhattarai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pushpa</surname><given-names>Kumari Jora</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Karnali Academy of Health Science, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Jumla, Nepal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Karnali Academy of Health Science, School of Public Health, Jumla, Nepal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Strengthening System for Better Health Activity, Kathmandu, Nepal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: The term job satisfaction refers to the attitude and feeling people have about their work. Employee job satisfaction is supremely important in an organization because it is what productivity depends on. 
  Objectives: To identify the job satisfaction among employees in Karnali Academy of Health Science, Jumla Nepal. 
  Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional research design was used to identify the situation of job satisfaction in the organization with the factor influencing and enhancing the level of job satisfaction. 
  Results: In this study, a total of 238 employees were included in the study as the employee staying on leave for more than one week and who have experience of less than one year are excluded. In this study, male employees were 115 and female were 123 included in the study. 36.65% agreed moderately that the payment is fair for their work in the organization which is the highest percentage. 36.14% agreed very much that in an organization, supervisors were competent in doing their job. 29.84% agreed very much that they were satisfied with the benefits received. 21.85% is the maximum number of employees who disagreed very much that communication seemed good within the organization. 73% agreed very much that their work assignment was explained to the employee in the organization. 
  Conclusion: This study proves that employees are satisfied with their supervisors and co-worker. Promotion, communication, salary increment, and benefits package are the recommendation from the study.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Job Satisfaction</kwd><kwd> Employee</kwd><kwd> KAHS</kwd><kwd> Plan and Policies</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Job satisfaction can be defined as a psychological state of how an individual feels towards work, in other words, it is people’s feelings and attitudes about a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic elements towards jobs and the organizations they perform their jobs. The elements of job satisfaction are related to pay, promotion, benefits, work nature, supervision, and relationship with colleagues. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref1">1</xref>] <sup> </sup></p><p>There are two types of job satisfaction which are based on the level of employees’ feelings regarding their jobs. The first, and most studied, is global job satisfaction, which refers to employees’ overall feelings about their jobs. The second is job facet satisfaction, which refers to feelings about specific job aspects, such as salary, benefits, and the quality of relationships with one’s co-workers. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref2">2</xref>]</p><p>“Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experience.” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref3">3</xref>] <sup> </sup></p><p>“Job satisfaction is the amount of pleasure or contentment associated with a job. If you like your job intensely, you will experience high job satisfaction. If you dislike your job intensely, you will experience job dissatisfaction.” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref4">4</xref>] <sup> </sup></p><p>Elwood Chapman helps to determine employee level of satisfaction and then assists in making positive changes to increase both satisfaction level and quality of work. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref5">5</xref>] <sup> </sup></p><p>C. J. Cranny, Patricia Cain Smith, and Eug&#232;ne F. Stone reveal perceiving future opportunity can actually be more motivating than actually receiving a raise, getting promoted, or being given additional responsibilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Jane Boucher offers practical advice for improving both your attitude about your job and the job itself. She shows workers how to cope with keeping their jobs in this difficult economy. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref6">6</xref>]</p><p>Chris Stride, Toby D. Wall, and Nick Catley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref7">7</xref>] presented widely used measurement scales of Job Satisfaction, Mental Health, Job-related Well-being and Organizational Commitment, along with benchmarking data for comparison. The benchmarking data is based on a sample of almost 60,000 respondents from 115 different organizations across a wide spectrum of industries and occupations. Information is given by occupational group, and is further broken down by age and gender [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125549-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Karnali Academy of Health Sciences (KAHS), established in 2011, is responsible for providing healthcare services to Karnali Province through its teaching hospital located in Jumla. The hospital offers various health services, such as orthopedics, surgery, dental, medical, pediatrics, dermatology, radiology, and more. Maternal and child health clinics are among the major healthcare services provided by this teaching hospital. However, the government of Nepal owned Karnali Zonal Hospital and started its services as Karnali Academy of Health Science, teaching hospital from 17th Kartik 2069.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Descriptive cross-sectional research design was used to identify situation of job satisfaction in the organization with the factor influencing and enhancing the level of job satisfaction. Data was collected by face to face interview method for the study. Data management and analysis was done as Frequencies, percentage was used in the study in combination with graphical and tabular presentation.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>For the study on “job satisfaction of employees in Karnali Academy of Health Science, it has been collected from 238 employees in which 115 were male and 123 were female.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows among the total respondent 115 were male and 123 were female.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows studying on marital status were 165 married and 72 were unmarried and 1 divorced.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows that maximum 121 (50.84%) were temporary employee and 4 (1.68%) were others.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that maximum 87 (36.65%) agree moderately whereas 12 (5.06%) disagree moderately on Being paid a fair amount for the work.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Categories of employee working in Karnali Academy of Health Science (n = 238)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Categories</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Permanent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contact</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Daily wages</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows that 67 (28.2%) disagree moderately on chance for promotion on job where as minimum 16 (6.722%) disagree slightly.</p><p>About the supervisor competency 86 (36.14%) agree very much that supervisor are competent where as minimum 9 (3.78%) disagree very much. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>)</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows that 71 (29.84%) agree very much that they are Not satisfied with the benefits received where as 10 (4.20%) disagree slightly.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> shows that 52 (21.85%) disagree very much that Communications seem good within this organization where as minimum 18 (7.56%) disagree moderately.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Being paid a fair amount for the work</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Chance for promotion on job</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Supervisor competent in doing his/her job</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, we can understand that 72 (30.25%) agree very much that their goal is clear and 17 (7.14%) disagree slightly.</p><p>View about the benefit package is equitable has 72 (30.25%) agree moderately and 27 (11.34%) agree very much. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>)</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> shows that 129 (54.20%) agree very much they Enjoy with co-workers and 6 (2.52%) disagree slightly.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 indices that 72 (30.25%) agree moderately on satisfaction with chances for salary increases and 18 (7.56%) agree slightly.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Not satisfied with the benefits received</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Communications seem good within this organization</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> The goals of this organization are not clear</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> The benefit package is equitable</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Enjoy with co-workers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Satisfied with chances for salary increases</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1 shows that 75 (31.52%) disagree very much on Satisfaction with chances for promotion where as 20 (8.40%) agree slightly.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2 shows that maximum 174 (73.10) agree very much as work assignment of employee explained to employee and minimum 2 (0.84%) disagree slightly.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion and Finding</title><p>In this study, total, 238 employee were included in the study as the employee</p><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Satisfied with chances for promotion</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Work assignment of employee explained to employee</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Likert scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree slightly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree moderately</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>staying in leave more than one week and who have experience of less than one year are excluded. In this study male employee were 115 and female were 123 included in the study. The findings from this study show that:</p><p>1) 36.65% agreed moderately that the payment is fair for their work in organization which is highest percentage.</p><p>2) 36.14% agreed very much that in organization supervisor are competent in doing their job.</p><p>3) 29.84% agreed very much that they are satisfied with the benefits received.</p><p>4) 21.85% that is maximum employee disagree very much that communication seems good within organization.</p><p>5) 73% agreed very much that their work assignment is explained to employee in organization.</p><p>The following are the major findings of the study:</p><p>1) KAHS employees seem to find the payment adequate for their work, which motivates them to perform well.</p><p>2) The employees are free from various tensions regarding their supervisor competency and ratio of workers in the organization.</p><p>3) Majority of the employees are not satisfied with the promotion in the organization so it should be addressed in the view of researcher to motivate the employee to their work.</p><p>4) Inter personal relationships among employees existing in the organisation needs more encouragement.</p><p>5) There is not free flow of communication between subordinates, superiors and peer groups.</p><p>6) The employee has understood the work assignment in the organization which is very positive factor for the improvement of the organization.</p><p>7) In the organization, it seems that employee is not satisfied with the salary increment.</p><p>8) KAHS employees enjoy working with the co-workers in the organization.</p><p>9) According to above mentioned data, employees are not satisfied with the benefit package which seems not equitable to the entire employee.</p><p>10) Goal of KAHS is clear to the entire employee.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Recommendations</title><p>Based on the above findings, the following recommendations are made for improving job satisfaction among employees in KAHS―Karnali Academy of Health Science, Jumla.</p><p>1) More and more opportunities should be provided to employees to promote inter personal relationships.</p><p>2) The promotion should be time bound and uniform in order to keep the morale of the employees high.</p><p>3) Although the salary seems adequate but the increment has to be done according to time and situation.</p><p>4) It would be good if benefit package would be equitable to the entire employee in the organization.</p><p>5) Every work would be done perfectly and completely if good and free flowing communication system would be maintained.</p><p>6) Employee would work energetically if promotion of employee would be done timely and according to policy.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>An employee’s assessment of job satisfaction is a complex evaluation of various elements of their job. This job satisfaction study was conducted to gather employees’ feedback on their feelings towards their job and work environment, providing a powerful diagnostic tool for identifying employee problems. Improved communication is another benefit of the study, particularly upward communication where employees are encouraged to express their true thoughts. The study reveals that employees are satisfied with their supervisors and coworkers, and certain recommendations have been made for management to further improve employee satisfaction. The study highlights the invaluable worth of human resources and underscores the importance of satisfying the needs of employees.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Chaulagain, S., Pahadi, N.K., Bhattarai, S.G. and Jora, P.K. (2023) A Study on Job Satisfaction of Employees in Karnali Academy of Health Science. Open Access Library Journal, 10: e10227. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110227</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.125549-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odembo, S.A. (2013) Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance within the Telecommunication Industry in Kenya: A Case of Airtel Kenya Limited. Thesis, Kenyatta University. 
&lt;br /&gt;https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/10135/Job%20Satisfaction%20and%20Employee%20&lt;br /&gt;Performance%20within%20the%20Telecommunication%20Industry%20in%20Kenya%20A%20Case%20of%20&lt;br /&gt;Airtel%20Kenya%20Limited.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125549-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abuhashesh, M., Al-Dmour, R. and Masa’deh, R. (2019) Factors That Affect Employees Job Satisfaction and Performance to Increase Customers’ Satisfactions. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 2019, Article ID: 354277.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125549-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spector, P.E. (1997) Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.  
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231549</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125549-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cranny, C.J., Smith, P.C. and Stone, E.F. (1992) Job Satisfaction: How People Feel about Their Jobs and How It Affects Their Performance. Lexington Books, Lanham.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125549-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chapman, E. (1993) Achieving Job Satisfaction: Helping Employees Reach Higher Productivity. Crisp Learning, Napa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125549-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boucher, J. (2004) How to Love the Job You Hate: Job Satisfaction for the 21st Century. Beagle Bay Inc., Reno.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125549-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stride, C., Wall, T.D. and Catley, N. (2008) Measures of Job Satisfaction, Organisational Commitment, Mental Health and Job Related Well-Being. John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd., Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125549-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watkins, R. and Fusch, P. (2022) Employee Monetary Compensation and Employee Job Satisfaction. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 321-339.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.109021</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>