<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2023.146049</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-125545</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessing the Pathogenic Ability of Six Species of &lt;i&gt;Fusarium&lt;/i&gt; Genus on Onion Variety in Burkina Faso
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouka</surname><given-names>Hamidou Sogoba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tounwendsida</surname><given-names>Abel Nana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alassane</surname><given-names>Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Sana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bawomon</surname><given-names>Fidèle Neya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Harouna</surname><given-names>Sawadogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kadidia</surname><given-names>Koïta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Centre Universitaire de Gaoua, Université Nazi Boni, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire Biosciences, Département de biologie végétale et de physiologie végétale, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>739</fpage><lpage>750</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Prema 178 onion variety is widely used in production in Burkina Faso. It is greatly appreciated but susceptible to basal rot. This study aimed to evaluate the pathogenic ability of six strains of 
  <em>Fusarium </em>genus identified in Burkina Faso on onion. Seeds, seedlings and bulbs were used for the test. A conidial suspension of each strain was made in tubes and adjusted to 1 &#215; 10
  <sup>6</sup> conidia/ml with distilled water for the different tests. Germination test in the laboratory and greenhouse showed that all treatments with the strains of 
  <em>Fusarium oxysporum</em> f. sp. 
  <em>cepae</em>, 
  <em>F. solani</em>, 
  <em>F. falciforme</em>, 
  <em>F. acutatum</em>,
  <em> F. proliferatum</em> and
  <em> F. sp.</em> induced failure to emerge and showed a significant difference with the control. The different strains also induced stunting rates of coleoptile growth. 
  <em>Fusarium oxysporum</em> f. sp. 
  <em>cepae</em>,
  <em> F. acutatum</em>,
  <em> F. proliferatum</em>, 
  <em>F. falciforme</em> and 
  <em>F. solani </em>were very aggressive, as they recorded above 50% damping-off rates. The test on the bulbs revealed that the strains were classified into two groups. The first consists of 
  <em>F. oxysporum</em> f. sp. 
  <em>cepae</em>,
  <em> F. solani</em>, 
  <em>F. falciform</em>e,
  <em> F. acutatum</em>, which caused rots with respective lengths from 2.06; 1.48; 1.84; 1.46 and 2.12 cm, thus very aggressive according to Ghanbarzadeh scale. The second is formed by 
  <em>F. proliferatum</em> which recorded 0.90 cm of rot length, thus moderately aggressive. It would be appropriate to suggest a sustainable management method for these pathogens in order to improve the yield of onion production.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Fusarium&lt;/i&gt; spp.</kwd><kwd> Pathogenicity</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Allium cepa&lt;/i&gt; L.</kwd><kwd> Burkina Faso</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The onion (Allium cepa L.) is a commonly produced and used vegetable around the world. It is used as a basic component in many preparations. In West Africa it is also used as a raw ingredient in salads or as an addition to grilled meat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref1">1</xref>] . World production of dried bulb onions was 96,773,819 in 2018 with an average yield of 19.20 t/ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref2">2</xref>] . In Burkina Faso, the onion production chain contributes significantly to the fight against food insecurity and poverty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref3">3</xref>] . Onion production has indeed increased by about 50% in the space of ten years, from 242,258 tons in 2008 to 408,832 tons in 2017. However, it has experienced declines in recent years. It decreased from 408,832 tons in the 2016-2017 season on 16,850 ha to 362,480 tons in 2018-2019 on 18,491.49 ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref4">4</xref>] . The decrease of onions production is due to several factors, including poor soil fertility, inappropriate crop management practices and fungal diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref6">6</xref>] . Among these diseases, basal rot caused by Fusarium fungi, can cause significant crop losses ranging from 2.9% to 80% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref7">7</xref>] . K&#246;yc&#252; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref8">8</xref>] has reported that seeds and bulbs of onions and soil are the main source of inoculum of Fusarium fungi. Among the species of the Fusarium genus reported as agents of onion basal rot worldwide, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani and Fusarium proliferatum are the most common species encountered [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref10">10</xref>] . In addition, it has been shown over the past decades that fungi frequently found in food can produce toxins, named mycotoxins. These toxins can cause human cancers. Mycotoxins such as fumonisins, trichothecenes and zearalenone are produced by some fungi of the Fusarium genus and are responsible for cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref11">11</xref>] . In Burkina Faso, several fungal species of the Fusarium genus have been reported to cause Fusarium basal rot disease on onions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref13">13</xref>] . However, the pathogenicity of these fungi has not yet been documented. This study aims to investigate the pathogenic ability of six species identified on onion in Burkina Faso.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Onion Variety Used</title><p>Prema 178 variety was used for the experiment. It was selected for its sensitivity to Fusarium basal rot. Seeds, bulbs and seedlings were used for the different tests. Bulbs were obtained from a producer of onions who used this variety. This variety has a 170-day cycle, producing large red bulbs with a potential yield of 30 tons/ha. It has a rainy season crop vocation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Fungi Isolation and Identification</title><p>Fungal material was composed of six species of Fusarium. These were Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae, Fusarium acutatum, Fusarium falciforme, Fusarium proliferatum and Fusarium sp. These six strains were derived from an identification of Fusarium species collected on onion in Burkina Faso. Organ fragments of onion were surface sterilized briefly and washed using 3% sodium hypochlorite and distilled water, respectively. The organ fragments were then used to obtain pure cultures of fungus isolates base on a repeating transfer technique using Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium with an antibiotic commercially named spectinomycin. The obtained pure cultures of fungus isolates were used for the morphological and molecular identifications as describe below [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Fusarium Fungi Inoculum Preparation</title><p>For this experiment, we have used a seven-day-old culture of each Fusarium species, grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate at 28˚C under a 12:12 light/dark photoperiod. After pouring five milliliters of sterile water on each plate, the mycelium and conidia were harvested by scraping the surface of the Fusarium colonies using a sterile scalpel. Then, the conidial concentration of the suspension obtained was determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. The suspension was adjusted to the final concentration of 1 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> for the pathogenicity test on seeds, seedlings and bulbs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Fusarium Species Effects on Seed Germination</title><p>The effects of Fusarium fungi on onion seed germination, seedlings and bulbs were assessed following the protocol described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref14">14</xref>] . After washing with distilled water, the onion seeds were immersed in 1% NaOCl for 10 min and then rinsed with distilled water for 15 min to ensure that fungi were not carried on the seed surface. A sample of 25 seeds of the onion variety Prema 178 was immersed in 10 ml of conidia suspension of a Fusarium species in a tube for 30 minutes. Then, the seeds were placed on sterile Whatman paper in a petri dish. The experiment was replicated five times. After nine days of incubation at 28˚C, the germination rate and the length of the coleoptiles were recorded (formula 1). The stunting rate was calculated according to the formula 2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>germinationrate = Numberofgerminatedseeds Numberofsowedseeds &#215; 100 (1)</p><p>Stuntingrate = ACLC − ACLT ACLC &#215; 100 (2)</p><p>ACLC = average coleoptile length of the control.</p><p>ACLT = average coleoptile length of the treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Assessment of the Effects of Fusarium Strains on Seedlings in the Greenhouse</title><p>In this experiment, we have used pots containing a mixture of sterile sand and sterilized compost (bokashi) in a 1:3 ratio. Disinfected onion seeds in 1% NaOCl for 10 min were inoculated with the different Fusarium strains and then 20 seeds were sowed in each pot. Control seeds were immersed in distilled water. The experiment was replicated five times. Pots were placed in a greenhouse (25˚C - 30˚C, 50% RH) under 14:10 light/dark photoperiod, following the protocol of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref17">17</xref>] . Watering was carried out with sterile water using a manuel sprayer. Fourteen days after sowing (DAS) we have assessed the emergence rate of seedlings, and the percentage of damping-off was calculated at 21 DAS and 45 DAS using the formula 2. Strains that caused damping-off rates above 50% were considered highly virulent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Testing the Effects of Fusarium Strains on Onion Bulbs Rot</title><p>For this experiment, fifteen bulbs with a diameter between 3 to 3.5 cm and grown in an incubator set at 28˚C were used per treatment for this test. For each Fusarium species, conidia suspension was prepared. After removing the outer scales, the bulbs were sterilized in 70% ethanol solution for 30 seconds. Perforations approximately 5 mm deep were made in the basal plate with a 4 mm diameter sterile punch. A total of five small holes were made in each bulb. Ten microliters of each inoculum were introduced into the holes and sealed with tape. The same quantity of water was used for the controls. The experiment was replicated five times. Rot length was observed for each treatment after two weeks of incubation and was noted by measurement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>The severity was classified into three groups:</p><p>&#183; rot length between 0.2 - 0.6 cm, less aggressive.</p><p>&#183; rot length between 0.6 - 1 cm, moderately aggressive.</p><p>&#183; rot length over 1 cm, very aggressive.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Data Analysis and Results Expression</title><p>Germination rate and stunting were expressed in percent and in centimeters for coleoptile length. All data were submitted to analysis of variance based using the R software version 4.1.1. Comparisons of the different means with the control were made using a 5 % significance level Tukey test.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effects of Fusarium Strains on Onion Seeds Germination</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the effects Fusarium strains on the percentage of emergence A at 9 DAS and coleoptile length. Statistical analysis revealed that seeds inoculation with each Fusarium strain have significantly reduced the germination of seeds of onion compared to the control seeds (p ≤ 0.001). The percentage of emergence was ranged from 33.60% to 56% for inoculated seeds and 84% for the control seeds. No differences were recorded between the effects of the Fusarium strains on onion seeds germination.</p><p>Regard to coleoptile growth, all Fusarium strains significantly decreased coleoptile length compared to the control (p ≤ 0.001). According to the results of the statistical analysis, there was a significant difference between the effects of Fusarium strains on coleoptile growth (p ≤ 0.001). The smallest coleoptile length</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of Fusarium strains on seeds emergence and coleoptile emergence and length</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Emergence 9 DAS (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coleoptile length (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >stunted growth rates</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.00 &#177; 5.66<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 &#177; 0.45<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.20 &#177; 8.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 &#177; 0.17<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.87 &#177; 8.50<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.60 &#177; 6.07<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21 &#177; 0.44<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.38 &#177; 7.00<sup>ac</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.00 &#177; 11.31<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92 &#177; 0.42<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.84 &#177; 3.00<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.80 &#177; 15.07<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 &#177; 0.47<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.30 &#177; 9.00<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.00 &#177; 13.56<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79 &#177; 0.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.77 &#177; 1.00<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.60 &#177; 18.24<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14 &#177; 0.67<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.10 &#177; 9.00<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p ≤ 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p ≤ 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p ≤ 0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Averages not sharing any letters are significantly different at the 5% level, according to the Tukey test. DAS = days after sowing; Foc = F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae; Fs = F. solani; Ff = F. falciforme; Fa = F. acutatum; Fp = F. proliferatum; Fsp = F. sp.</p><p>(0.71 cm) was recorded with seeds inoculated with F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae compared to seeds inoculated with F. acutatum (1.88 cm) or F. proliferatum (1.79 cm).</p><p>All strains induced stunted coleoptile growth rates. Rates ranged from 49.30% to 79.87%. A significant difference was noted (p ≤ 0.001). F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae and F. falciforme treatments recorded the highest reduction rates compared to F. acutatum.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effects of Fusarium Strains on Onion Seedlings and Root Length in Greenhouse</title><p>Emergence at 14 DAS and root length at 45 DAS are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Emergence rate ranged from 32% to 53% for inoculated seeds and 73% for the control seeds. There was a highly significant difference between the emergence rate in inoculated seeds and the emergence rate in the control seeds (p ≤ 0.007). However, no significant difference was recorded between the Fusarium strains used.</p><p>The root length ranged from 3.04 to 3.50 cm for the strains of Fusarium compared to 4.50 cm with the control. No significant difference was recorded between the treatments (p ≤ 0.631).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effects of Fusarium Strains on Onion Seedlings Damping-Off in Greenhouse</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the damping-off rates at 21 and 45 DAS. At 21 DAS damping-off was observed and some plants showed similar symptoms to those observed in the field during the survey. No symptoms were observed on the control plants. Fusarium strains used for inoculation were re-isolated from root trays of diseased</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Emergence rate and root length of inoculated seedlings</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Emergence at 14 DAS (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Roots length (cm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 &#177; 10.37<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.50 &#177; 0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 &#177; 16.81<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.04 &#177; 1.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 4.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.40 &#177; 2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 4.47<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20 &#177; 1.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 &#177; 10.61<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10 &#177; 1.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 &#177; 20.31<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50 &#177; 1.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 &#177; 14.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20 &#177; 0.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=0.631</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Averages not sharing any letters are significantly different at the 5% level, according to the Tukey test. DAS = days after sowing; Foc = F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae; Fs = F. solani; Ff = F. falciforme; Fa = F. acutatum; Fp = F. proliferatum; Fsp = F. sp.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.125545-formula1"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-3004166x11.png?20230612105909768"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note: Sticks not sharing any letters are significantly different at the 5% level, according to the Tukey test. DR = Damping-off; Foc = F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae; Fs = F. solani; Ff = F. falciforme; Fa = F. acutatum; Fp = F. proliferatum; Fsp = F. sp.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Damping-off rate at 21 DAS and 45 DAS of Prema 178 variety according to the treatments.</p><p>plants to check Koch’s postulate. Damping-off was observed for all treatments at this time. Nevertheless, the highest damping-off was recorded in seedlings from inoculated seeds. Statistical analysis has revealed significant difference between the damping-off rate in seedlings from inoculated seeds and that in control seedlings at 21 DAS (p ≤ 0.002) and 45 DAS (p ≤ 0.001). F. acutatum showed a significant difference with the control at 21 DAS (p ≤ 0.006). Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae, F. solani, F. falciforme, F. acutatum and F. proliferatum recorded significant differences with the control with p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.006, p ≤ 0.001 and p ≤ 0.001 respectively. Fusarium sp. did not show any significant difference with the control. According to the scale of Bayraktar and Dolar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref17">17</xref>] , Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae, F. acutatum, F. proliferatum, F. falciforme and F. solani strains were very aggressive. In contrast, Fusarium sp. was not aggressive.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Effects of Fusarium Strains on the Rot of Onion Bulbs</title><p>All strains of Fusarium have caused the rot in onion bulbs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Statistical analysis indicated that there was a significant difference between the rot lengths caused by Fusarium species (p ≤ 0.001). F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae, F. falciforme and Fusarium sp. have caused the deepest onion bulb rots, 2.06 cm, 1.84 cm and 2.12 cm, respectively. The rot lengths allowed to group Fusarium strains into two groups according to the scale of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref17">17</xref>] . Thus, F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae, F. solani, F. falciforme, F. acutatum and Fusarium sp. which caused rot lengths from 1.46 to 2.12 cm were classified as very aggressive, and F. proliferatum with a rot length of 0.90 cm, as moderately aggressive. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows evidence of onion bulb rot due to Fusarium strains. No rot was observed on the control bulbs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Fusrium oxysporum f. sp. cepae, Fusarium falciforme and Fusarium sp. induced rotting of scaly leaves and the fleshy leaves, while the bud remained healthy (Figures 2(b)-(d)). Fusarium acutatum and Fusarium solani induced slight rotting of scaly leaves and the fleshy leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(f)). F. proliferatum showed the start of rot of scaly leaves and the fleshy leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(g)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Pathogenicity test performed on the onion Prema 178 variety allowed to discriminate the strains on a number of parameters and to compare their degree of pathogenicity with the control. The results obtained showed that all the Fusarium fungal strains had an inhibitory effect on onion seeds emergence. This</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Rot length (in cm) caused by the fungal strains</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rots length (cm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.05<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06 &#177; 2.06<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48 &#177; 0.11<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84 &#177; 0.21<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46 &#177; 0.22<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90 &#177; 0.14<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12 &#177; 0.08<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P ≤ 0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Averages not sharing any letters are significantly different at the 5% level, according to the Tukey test. Foc = F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae; Fs = F. solani; Ff = F. falciforme; Fa = F. acutatum; Fp = F. proliferatum; Fsp = F. sp.</p><p>effect was observed in the laboratory and in the greenhouse. This would confirm the pathogenicity of the strains used in the present study. Indeed, several species of the genus Fusarium are known to be pathogenic fungi of onion. Kalman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref16">16</xref>] and Tirado-Ramirez [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref19">19</xref>] reported that F. acutatum and F. falciforme can prevent onion seed germination. Similarly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref21">21</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref22">22</xref>] also showed that F. oxysporum and F. proliferatum could cause failure to emerge and damping-off. Fusarium can be transmitted to onions during all stages of development and will develop under remarkably broad conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>All strains used showed an inhibitory effect on coleoptile growth, thus causing the observed growth retardation rates. This growth inhibition attests to the pathogenicity of the species tested and their impact on seedling emergence. Indeed, during plant growth, coleoptile helps first leaf emergence (and shoot apex) by protecting it during it passage in the soil. The first leaf breaks through the tip of the coleoptile at emergence. In addition to stunting, damping-off was observed in all the fungal strains tested. Several authors have reported the action of species of Fusarium genus as damping-off fungi individually or in combination. This action synergy was reported by some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref27">27</xref>] . Fusarium pathogens use both general and specific pathogenicity to invade their hosts. Hydrolytic enzymes involved in plant cell wall damage and cell signaling pathway components, which are often required for systemic pathogen invasion, are comprising pathogenicity factors, while the production and secretion of effectors and host-specific toxins are specific pathogenicity factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref28">28</xref>] . Fusarium sp. strain did not differ from the control in damping-off. However, in the laboratory and in the greenhouse, it did cause a lack of emergence. This would indicate that the strain of this species used would not be a pathogen associated with damping-off. No difference was found in root length between the strain and control treatments when measured at 45 days. That could be explained by the fact that the plants that were able to survive until 45 days corresponding to the end of the nursery period developed resistance to the pathogen strains used and started to grow well.</p><p>Based on the results of the bulb infection, it was possible to group the strains into two groups according to the aggressiveness, which was reflected in the length of the rots observed. The first group is constituted by F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae, F. solani, F. falciforme, F. acutatum, and Fusarium sp. which were the most aggressive. The second group was F. proliferatum which was considered moderately aggressive. This work is in agreement with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref19">19</xref>] . They report in their work that F. falciforme is a new agent of onion bulb rot and would be more aggressive on the bulb than F. oxysporum. Kint&#233;ga [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref22">22</xref>] showed that there are strains of F. proliferatum which are very aggressive on bulbs and others which are less aggressive, which could justify the results obtained in this study which show that F. proliferatum was not very aggressive. Ghanbarzadeh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref18">18</xref>] reported that F. solani is a rotting agent of underground parts of onion.</p><p>In this study, the aggressiveness was variable according to the strain and the organ targeted for inoculation. Taylor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125545-ref29">29</xref>] found correlations between the pathogenicity on onion seedlings and bulbs of some Fusarium species. This work reported the pathogenicity of Fusarium strains isolated in Burkina Faso, which could affect onion production in this country. Data on the pathogens responsible for onion basal rot disease are valuable, as they can contribute to the development of breeding programs for resistant cultivars and control methods.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The pathogenicity study on six strains of the Fusarium genus (F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae, F. solani, F. falciforme, F. proliferatum, F. acutatum and Fusarium sp.) revealed that all strains of these species are pathogenic and induce emergence failures and have an inhibitory effect on coleoptile growth. In contrast to the Fusarium sp. strain, all other strains cause severe damping-off. The bulb rot test allowed the strains of these species to be classified into two groups. The first group is constituted by F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae, F. solani, F. falciforme, F. acutatum, and Fusarium sp. and the second group by F. proliferatum. In this study, a variable pathogenicity of the tested strains was observed, the species behaved differently depending on the inoculated organ. It would be appropriate to suggest a sustainable management method for these pathogens in order to improve the yield of onion production.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sogoba, K.H., Nana, T.A., Ouattara, A., Sana, M., Neya, B.F., Sawadogo, H. and Ko&#239;ta, K. (2023) Assessing the Pathogenic Ability of Six Species of Fusarium Genus on Onion Variety in Burkina Faso. Agricultural Sciences, 14, 739-750. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.146049</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.125545-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">White, K. and Zellner, J. (2008) Onion. Hamilton College Seminar 235 Food for Thought: The Science, Culture and Politics of Food Spring, New York, United States, August 2008, 29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faostat (2020) Food and Agricultural Organization. https://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#data/QV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DPSAA (2011) Rapport général du module mara&amp;#238;chage. Ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Hydraulique, Ouagadougou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DGESS (2019) Rapport de l’Enquête maraichère 2018. Ministère de l’agriculture et des aménagements hydro-agricoles, Ouagadougou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;#214;zer, N., K&amp;#246;ycü, N., Chilosi, G. and Magro, P. (2004) Resistance to Fusarium Basal Rot of Onion in Greenhouse and Field and Associated Expression of Antifungal Compounds. Phytoparasitica, 32, 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979850</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwartz, H.F. and Mohan, S.K. (2008) Compendium of Onion and Garlic Diseases and Pests. 2nd Edition, The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Somkuwar, R., Veere-Gowda, R., Singh, T.H. and Pathak, C.S. (1996) Screening of Onion for Resistance to Onion Basal Rot. Madras Agricultural Journal, 83, 273-275.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K&amp;#246;ycü, N. and &amp;#214;zer, N. (1997) Determination of Seedborne Fungi in Onion and Their Transmission to Onion Sets. Phytoparasitica, 25, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981476</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwartz, H.F. and Mohan, S.K. (2008) Compendium of Onion and Garlic Diseases and Pests. 2nd Edition, The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, 23-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zlata, K.&amp;#352;., Jelena, L., Stevan, M., Jelica, G.V., Mirjana, V. and Svjetlana, A. (2008) Fusarium Rot of Onion and Possible Use of Bioproduct. Zbornik Matice Srpske za Prirodne Nauke, 114, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSPN0814135K</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pitt, J.I. (2000) Toxigenic Fungi: Which Are Important? Medical Mycology, 38, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/mmy.38.1.17.22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kintéga, K.R., Zida, P.E., Tarpaga, V.W., Sankara, P. and Séréme, P. (2020) Identification of Fusarium Species Associated with Onion (Allium cepa L.) Plants in Field in Burkina Faso. Advances in Biosciences and Biotechnology, 11, 94-110. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2020.113008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sogoba, K.H., Ko&amp;#239;ta,K., Ouattara, A., Nana, T.A., Soura, B.H. and Campa, C. (2021) Distribution, Diversity and Identification of Hot Spot of Fusarium spp. Associated with Onion (Allium cepa L.) in Burkina Faso. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, 9, 241-249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sogoba, K.H., Ko&amp;#239;ta, K., Ouattara, A., Sana, M., Kassankogno, A.I., Sawadogo, H. and Campa, C. (2022) Pathogenic Characterization of Three Fusarium Species Associated with Onion (Allium cepa L.) in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Phytopathology, 11, 267-276. https://doi.org/10.33687/phytopath.011.03.4327</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaboré, K.H. (2014) étude de la pathogénicité et du contr&amp;#244;le de souches d’Alternaria et de Fusarium isolées sur oignon au Burkina Faso. Université Cathologique de Louvain, Faculté d’Ingénierie biologique, agronomique et environnementale, Belgique.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalman, B., Abraham, D., Graph, S., Perl-Treves, R., Harel, Y.M. and Degani, O. (2020) Isolation and Identification of Fusarium spp., the Causal Agents of Onion (Allium cepa L.) Basal Rot in Northeastern Israel. Biology, 9, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9040069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bayraktar, H. and Dolar, F.S. (2010) Molecular Identification and Genetic Diversity of Fusarium Species Associated with Onion Fields in Turkey. Journal of Phytopathology, 159, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01715.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghanbarzadeh, B., Goltapeh, E.M. and Safaie, N. (2014) Identification of Fusarium Species Causing Basal Rot of Onion in East Azarbaijan Province, Iran and Evaluation of Their Virulence on Onion Bulbs and Seedlings. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 47, 1050-1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.829628</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tirado-Ramirez, M.A., López-Urquídez, G.A., Amarillas-Bueno, L.A., Retes-Manjarrez, J.E., Vega-Gutiérrez, T.A. and Avenda&amp;#241;o, J.E.L. (2021) Identification and Virulence of Fusarium falciforme and Fusarium brachygibbosum as Causal Agents of Basal Rot on Onion in Mexico. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 43, 722-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2021.1894241</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haapalainen, M., Latvala, S., Kuivainen, E., Qiu, Y., Segerstedt, M. and Hannukkala, A.O. (2016) Fusarium oxysporum, F. proliferatum and F. redolens Associated with Basal Rot of Onion in Finland. Plant Pathology, 65, 1310-1320. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Esfahani</surname><given-names> M.N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2018</year>)<article-title>Genetic and Virulence Variation in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae Causing Root and Basal Rot of Common Onion in Iran</article-title><source> Journal of Phtytopatholoy</source><volume> 166</volume>,<fpage> 572</fpage>-<lpage>580</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kintéga, K.R., Zida, P.E., Soalla, R., Tarpaga, V.W., Sankara, P. and Sereme, P. (2020) Determination of Fusarium Species Associated with Onion Plants (Allium cepa L.) in Field in Burkina Faso Causing Damping-Off and Bulb Rots. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 11, 64-79. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.111006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leslie, J.F. and Summerell, B.A. (2006) The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470278376</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le, D., Audenaert, K. and Haesaert, G. (2021) Fusarium Basal Rot: Profile of an Increasingly Important Disease in Allium spp. Tropical Plant Pathology, 46, 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-021-00421-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Donnell, K., Ward, T.J., Vincent, A., Crous, R.P.W., Geiser, D.M. and Kang, S. (2015) DNA Sequence-Based Identification of Fusarium: Current Status and Future Directions. Phytoparasitica, 43, 583-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-015-0484-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kee, Y.J., Zakaria, L. and Mohd, M.H. (2020) Morphology, Phylogeny and Pathogenicity of Fusarium Species from Sansevieria trifasciata in Malaysia. Plant Pathology, 69, 442-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dongzhen, F., Xilin, L., Xiaorong, C., Wenwu, Y., Yunlu, H., Yi, C., Jia, C., Zhimin, L., Litao, G., Tuhong, W., Xu, J. and Chunsheng, G. (2020) Fusarium Species and Fusarium oxysporum Species Complex Genotypes Associated with Yam Wilt in South-Central China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, Article No. 1964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01964</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, L.J., Geiser, D.M., Proctor, R.H., Rooney, A.P., O’Donnell, K., Trail, F., Gardiner, D.M., Manners, J.M. and Kazan, K. (2013) Fusarium Pathogenomics. Annual Review of Microbiology, 67, 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155650</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125545-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, A., Vagany, V., Jackson, A.C., Harrison, R.J., Rainoni, A. and Clarkson, J.P. (2016) Identification of Pathogenicity-Related Genes in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae. Molecular Plant Pathology, 17, 1032-1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12346</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>