A field is formed by a physical object which generates, a physical quantity represented by a scalar [3] , a vector, or a tensor [4] in its surrounding. In the following, fields will consist, at any given point, of a numerical value bearing a physical unit, which will be named the “field value” and three vectors with the same physical units. These values can be continuously evaluated everywhere in the space around the object, independently of the choice of any reference frame.

Symbol “ ∧ ”, a mathematical symbol is used for vector cross product.

To simplify physical formulas reported in this article, the permeability and the electric permittivity in vacuum are taken equal to one.

Let us define the field value in “p” created by an infinite line with a given physical property U, as a continuous function of the field value equal to U/r, where r is the distance between p and the line.

F i e l d = U r (1)

The value decreases when the distance “r” to the infinite line increases. Using this function, several curves of isovalue U/r can be represented in a plane perpendicular to the line. They form circles centered in the infinite line as shown in Figure 2(a).

Additionally, let us define three vectors at point “p” as shown in Figure 2(b). Their directions can be defined in relation to the wire using three directions: parallel, perpendicular, or orthogonal.

1) The projection of point “p” onto the line is point “e”. Vector A is defined starting at “p” perpendicularly to the wire and pointing toward “e”. The norm of vector A is equal to the physical field value at point “p”, which is U/r. Note that the derivative of this vector can be named as gradient vector since the value of U/r continuously increases when r decreases.

2) Vector C is defined as originating at “p” and parallel to the line. The norm of vector C is also equal to U/r.

3) In the orthogonal direction to the plane formed by vectors A and C, vector B is drawn with a norm of U/r. This vector will be named potential vector. It is tangent to the circle centered in “e” and passing through “p”.

With such a description, all three vectors have the same norm also equal to the field value and are orthogonal to the other two. These vectors which have arbitrary chosen orientations, can be created at any positions in the space around the infinite line.

Field value and vectors at any point in the field are now defined with a unique physical field value and three orthogonal directions originating from that point.

Figure 2 illustrates the case where U is positive. When the physical field source changes, all vector directions are reversed as the physical value at point p, and the square root of cross product is also reversed. Both cases are addressed in Table 1.

The following paragraph gives additional details about relationships between each vector and the others.

We have defined orthogonal vectors with identical norms (U/r), which means they have the same physical units. Yet, how is it possible to write a formal relationship between these three vectors and improve our definitions of the field described in the previous paragraph? To do so, we will use the square root of the cross product to link the three vectors (see also discussion for more details).

The corresponding mathematical relations between the three vectors are summarized in Table 1.

In Table 1, the field source is either positive (top of Table 1) or negative (bottom of Table 1). Then, when the physical field source changes, all vector directions are reversed as the physical value at point “p”.

Moreover, at all points located at distance “r” from the infinite line, the field value remains constant. It is then possible to draw curves of iso-value of the field, curves that circular in the case of one infinite line. Along these lines, vectors A and B change directions gradually, while vector C remains in the same direction.

Let us explore the above definition when applied to a field created by an infinitely elongated line with a static density of electrical charge [5] [6] (in 2.3.3). We will draw parallels between our unified definition and the electrostatic field definition found in physics literature.

This theoretical line is very thin and not conducting. The line, which has a static density of charge U equal to Q/L in Coulomb by meter, and where Q is the charge on the length L, generates an electrostatic field in its surroundings (Figure 3), that can be described using our specific field definitions.

Figure 3 is a 3D drawing where the electrostatic field [3] is described using our unified field definition.

At any point “p”, the physical field value, and hence the norms of the three vectors originating at that point, can be calculated. Vector A points away from the positive charge or toward the negative charge. The derivative of vector A is in usual terms called the gradient vector (where the field value increases most quickly and in 1/r²). Equipotential lines i.e., curves along which the field value remains constant, are circles centered in point “e” and passing by point “p” [5] . These equipotential lines drawn here are the same trajectories found in literature. Vectors tangent to the equipotential lines could in this case be named S, for electrostatic potential vectors. The field value, which is also the norm of our potential vector is equal to (Q/L)/r, as defined in literature.

Our last vector, the parallel vector C, does not have an equivalent in classical electrostatic field description. However, it will prove useful in the case of a magnetic field.

Arbitrarily, we define that for a negative charge, the square root cross products of each pair of vectors are positive whereas for a positive charge, they are negative.

Here we have seen that our unified definition of electrical fields is compatible with the definition of electrostatic field found in physics literature.

In the following paragraph, we apply our model to magnetic fields induced by electrical current in a wire.

Around a conducting wire with a static current, Oersted [7] discovered in 1820 that the orientation of a compass changes, but surprisingly without any contact between the magnet and the wire [8] . Oersted and fellow scientists among which Biot, Savart and Ampere have shown that the field around an infinite electrical wire [9] [10] (in 5.2.2), varies in I/r, which is the ratio of the current by the distance from the wire.

In terms of our unified field definition, the parameter U is, in this case of an electromagnetic field, the current I that flows through the infinite line. The physical value at any point “p” is hence −I/r (Figure 4(a)), and +I/r when the electrical current is reversed (Figure 4(b)).

Vectors C are oriented by the direction of the electrical current. Vectors C depend on each sign of the field: going up in Figure 4(a) (left) and down Figure 4(b) (right). Vectors M are oriented with the right-hand screw rule, and its norm is I/r.

We can name our magnetic vector M, as magnetic field vector, as classically defined in literature. Isovalue of the field value, defined as the norm of M, are equidistant to the wire and draw circles to which vectors M are tangent. This is compatible with the definition of trajectories of magnetic field lines found in literature. Additionally, vectors M follow the right-hand rule with the two other vectors.

Although, the classical theory and our definition of fields appears very close, but there is an important difference: in literature, the three vectors do not have identical physical expressions and not the same norm at point “p” [11] . This is the subject of the first paragraph in the discussion.

The magnetic field vector introduced by Biot and Savart allows to calculate with an integration procedure the magnetic field around a conducting wire. The author has used this integration, but a difficulty has been found in the calculation used for the original field vector. This paragraph proposes a better calculation by exploring the parallel between the unified field definition in the case of an electromagnetic field and the Biot-Savart law which specifically defines the magnetic field around a small portion of an electrical wire [12] . In this comparison we calculate the magnetic field vectors dB at points “p” located away from the conducting segment, in a direction that is not perpendicular to the current field vector (i.e., to the wire).

In Figure 5, a segment of a wire of length “dl”, through which flows a current “I” which generates a magnetic field at any point “p”. In this figure, the magnetic vector is named “dB” [12] . Vector “C” is the current vector, parallel to the flowing current “I”. Vector “Ru” in (a) et “R” in (b) are in the same direction of “d” between “m” and “p”. The right-hand rule is applied to draw the three vectors in both drawings [15] .

The resulting magnetic vector can be derived in both referential and using an angle θ which is necessary for the cross product of both first vectors.

Classical theory (Biot-Savart law) shown in Figure 5(a) (left):

d B = ( I d l ∧ R u ) / d 2 (2)

‖ d B ‖ = I d l sin θ

Unified field definition shown in Figure 5(b) (right):

d B = ( I d l / d 2 ∧ R I d l / d 3 ) 1 / 2 (3)

‖ d B ‖ = I d l sin θ

Although definitions of the base vectors are different in Biot-Savart commonly used law and our usage of field vectors, the resulting values of the norm of vectors d B are the same. In Figure 5(a)) (left), as in scientific literature, the physical unit of the two vectors are not equal to the physical unit of vector d B . In Figure 5(b) (right), the physical units of the three vectors I d l / d 2 , R I d l / d 3 and d B are the same, allowing a better understanding of the calculation of the square root of the cross product.

By superposing the two exposed cases of opposite charges in an electrostatic field or opposite flowing current in an electromagnetic field, vectors will be cancelled, and their norms will be naught. The field is cancelled. This confirms the additivity property of the wire (neutralized charges or neutralized currents) in the unified field model of this paper.

Since our proposed definition obeys the property of additivity of the wire, it specifically follows the superposition principle [16] . This has to be confirmed for the field additivity when several wires are used.

The cross product is a mathematical operator between two vectors giving a vector which cannot be represented in the same physical space. In the literature, many definitions are proposed for the resulting vector: pseudo vector, axial vector, bivector, external vector [11] .

In this paper, we use the square root of the cross product to obtain a resulting vectors that belong to the same space, and then can be compared to each other.

This may be a strong proposition to guide the use of cross product in other physical domains.