<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2023.115001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-124786</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound on Different Types of Knee Osteoarthritis in the Elderly
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Na</surname><given-names>Wen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yingcong</surname><given-names>Xiao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Medical Technology, Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: To evaluate the curative effect of the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) external therapy on knee osteoarthritis patients with different TCM constitutions using musculoskeletal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and to explore the application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in knee joint diseases. 
  Methods: A total of 57 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis in Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from December 2019 to May 2021 were collected, and they were divided into qi stagnation and blood stasis type group (23 cases) and cold-dampness obstruction type group (34 cases) according to the traditional Chinese medicine method. All patients were given acupuncture combined with TCM fumigation and washing. All patients underwent musculoskeletal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography before and after treatment, observed and recorded relevant data, and compared the treatment effects between the two groups. 
  Results: 85.96% (49/57) of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients had suprapatellar bursa effusion, 42.1% (24/57) had iliotibial band bursae effusion, some of which had poor sound transmission, and thickened synovium was seen in most effusions, 33.33% (19/57) had osteophyte formation. Compared with before treatment, the depth of suprapatellar sac effusion in the Qi stagnation and blood stasis type group decreased after treatment (P &lt; 0.05). The protrusion height decreased (P &lt; 0.05), and the infrapatellar and prefermoral fat pad thickness increased (P &lt; 0.05). The contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the thickened synovial membrane of the knee joint in KOA patients showed different degrees of uniform enhancement, showing slow in and slow out. Compared with the surrounding soft tissue, the arterial phase showed equal enhancement. The enhanced synovium had a clear boundary and a clear boundary with the effusion. In the venous phase, the intensity gradually decreased until clearing. Compared with before treatment, there was no significant difference in contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters in the qi stagnation and blood stasis type group after treatment (P &lt; 0.05). 
  Conclusion: Musculoskeletal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was used to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of TCM external therapy on KOA for different TCM constitutions. Dynamic observation of synovial lesions of knee osteoarthritis provides a valuable imaging method for evaluating the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound</kwd><kwd> External Treatment of Traditional Chinese Medicine</kwd><kwd> Knee Osteoarthritis</kwd><kwd> Qi Stagnation and Blood Stasis Type</kwd><kwd> Cold-Dampness Obstruction Type</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common arthropathy in the elderly, with an incidence of 50% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref1">1</xref>] . The deformities and disabilities caused by it seriously affect the quality of life of the elderly. At present, the TCM diagnosis and treatment methods of KOA are mainly acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine external compress, TCM physiotherapy, and other methods, and their efficacy is accurate and the side effects are low [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref2">2</xref>] . However, intuitive imaging methods are lacking to quantify their efficacy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an ultrasound technology that has emerged in recent years, using microbubble acoustic contrast agents to infuse microvascular vessels, forming a strong contrast with surrounding tissues, and has been widely used in the diagnosis of lesions in organs such as the liver, heart, and thyroid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref3">3</xref>] . The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) guidelines explicitly use ultrasonography as an effective method of assessing synovial vascularization in rheumatoid arthritis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref4">4</xref>] , but there have been no studies of the correlation between ultrasonography and KOA lesions. Therefore, this study observes the efficacy of TCM external treatment in elderly KOA patients with different dialectical types, compares the changes of two-dimensional myoskeletal ultrasound and ultrasonography parameters before and after treatment, and aims to explore the clinical application value of ultrasonography in the evaluation of the efficacy of different types of KOA lesions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Subjects of Study</title><p>From December 2019 to May 2021, 57 cases of patients with knee osteoarthritis were collected, 15 cases were male and 42 cases were female, with an average age of 57.53 &#177; 7.32 years. According to the Chinese medicine Wang Wen Qing qi, the patients were divided into a qi stagnation blood stasis type group (23 cases) and a cold and wet paralysis type group (34 cases), both groups were given acupuncture combined with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) fumigation treatment. Patients are included according to the following criteria: 1) Patients diagnosed with early KOA according to the criteria of the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoarthritis (2018 Edition) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref5">5</xref>] ; 2) According to the “Consensus of Experts on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in Traditional Chinese Medicine (2015 Edition) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref6">6</xref>] ; Patients who meet the dialectical standards of Chinese medicine qi stagnation blood stasis type or cold and wet paralysis type; 3) No contraindications to ultrasonic angiography. Exclusion criteria: 1) Knee joint with gout, tumors, rheumatoid arthritis, and other connective tissue diseases; 2) Patients with a history of previous surgery on the knee joint; 3) Patients with acute or severe disease of important organs such as heart, brain, and kidneys. All patients signed an informed consent form for ultrasonography to record the changes of ultrasound and angiography parameters of knee muscles and bones by ultrasound and ultrasonography before treatment and after the course of treatment and compared the treatment effect of external treatment in different types of patients.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Instruments and Methods</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Routine Ultrasound</title><p>The GE E9 ultrasonic diagnostics are equipped with 9 L and 10 L high-frequency linear array probes at frequencies of 7 - 12 MHz. The patient is in the supine position, the knee joint flexion is 120 degrees, and the horizontal, longitudinal, and sliding scans are performed on the patient’s knee joint with a linear array probe to observe the changes in bone and cartilage tissue, surrounding bursal effusion and the thickness of each tendon before and after knee joint treatment, and record the depth of suprapatellar sac effusion, the thickness of the synovial membrane, the thickness of the quadriceps, the thickness of the biceps tendon and patellar tendon, the height of the meniscus protrusion, and the thickness of the infrafemoral fat pad.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound</title><p>Scanning the patient’s knee joint, selecting the more severe lesion on the side of CEUS, switching the CEUS mode after determining the section, rapidly injecting 2 ml of the acoustic novy contrast agent with the vonovirate through the elbow vein, immediately flushing the tube with 5 ml of saline, observing the enhanced mode, and collecting the image. The time-intensity curve is used to record the peak intensity, peak time, average perfusion time, area under the curve, slope, and other parameters. The changes in parameters before and after treatment in the two groups were observed.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Other Information</title><p>Other Information Record the basic information of the patient: gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), time of illness; Image data: K-L grading, etc.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Methods</title><p>The Statistical Product and Service Solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref7">7</xref>] SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis, enumeration data were expressed by case or rate, differences were expressed by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test; measurement data were tested for normality by K-S, normally distributed data were expressed by x &#175; &#177; s, and differences were expressed by pairing Sample t-test. P &lt; 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Comparison of Basic Data of Two Groups of Patients</title><p>There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, height, weight, BMI, disease duration, and K-L grading between the qi stagnation and blood stasis type group and the cold-dampness obstruction type group (P &gt; 0.05), as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Two-Dimensional Musculoskeletal Ultrasonograph</title><p>85.96% (49/57) of KOA patients had suprapatellar sac effusion, 42.1% (24/57) had iliotibial band bursae effusion, part of the sound transmission is poor, and a thickened synovial membrane can be seen in part of the effusion. 33.33% (19/57) of patients had osteophyte formation. Compared with before treatment, the depth of suprapatellar sac effusion in the qi stagnation and blood stasis group decreased after treatment (P &lt; 0.05). The depth of suprapatellar sac effusion decreased in the cold-dampness obstruction type group (P &lt; 0.05). The height of the meniscus protrusion is reduced (P &lt; 0.05), and increased infrapatellar and prefemoral fat pad thick (P &lt; 0.05). See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Synovial Contrast Ultrasound Comparison</title><p>The contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the thickened synovial membrane of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of basic data of knee osteoarthritis between two groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Project</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Qi stagnation and blood stasis type group (n = 23)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cold-dampness obstruction type group (n = 34)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t/x<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender (eg, male/female)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8/15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7/27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.232</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (y, x &#175; &#177; s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.65 &#177; 7.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.12 &#177; 6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.735</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.406</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height (cm, x &#175; &#177; s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.83 &#177; 6.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.26 &#177; 6.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.443</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.692</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight (kg, x &#175; &#177; s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.64 &#177; 12.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.36 &#177; 9.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.435</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.067</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>, x &#175; &#177; s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.05 &#177; 3.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.40 &#177; 3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.527</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sick time (y, x &#175; &#177; s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.37 &#177; 4.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.73 &#177; 7.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.074</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Right knee (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56% (13/23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.8% (20/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.863</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K-L Grading ≥ 2 (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.4% (19/23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.4% (27/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.585</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.747</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: △: Compared with before treatment P &lt; 0.05.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of musculoskeletal ultrasound parameters before and after treatment between the two groups (mm, x &#175; &#177; s)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Qi stagnation and blood stasis type group (n = 23)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cold-dampness obstruction type group (n = 34)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Before therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >After treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Before therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >After treatment</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suprapatellar sac effusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.11 &#177; 3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 &#177; 2.91<sup>△</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.54 &#177; 2.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42 &#177; 2.25<sup>△</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Synovial thickness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84 &#177; 2.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41 &#177; 2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.16 &#177; 2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26 &#177; 3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.922</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quadriceps tendon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.17 &#177; 0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.55 &#177; 1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.35 &#177; 1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.10 &#177; 0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.810</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biceps femoris tendon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.93 &#177; 0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.99 &#177; 1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.828</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.79 &#177; 1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71 &#177; 1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.802</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patellar tendon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.55 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58 &#177; 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.69 &#177; 1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35 &#177; 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.611</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meniscus protrusion height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0 &#177; 1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47 &#177; 2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.17 &#177; 2.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54 &#177; 2.25<sup>△</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.879</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infrapatellar fat pad thickness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.85 &#177; 1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.38 &#177; 1.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.974</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.343</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.46 &#177; 1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.34 &#177; 1.74<sup>△</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anterior thigh fat pad thickness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.72 &#177; 2.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.62 &#177; 2.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.945</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.90 &#177; 2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.88 &#177; 2.28<sup>△</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: △: Compared with before treatment P &lt; 0.05.</p><p>the knee joint in KOA patients showed different degrees of uniform enhancement, showing slow in and slow. In the arterial phase, it is isoenhanced compared with the surrounding soft tissue, and the enhanced synovium has a clear boundary and is clearly demarcated from the effusion. The intensity of the venous phase gradually decreases until washout. Compared with before treatment, there was no significant difference in contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters between the qi stagnation and blood stasis type group after treatment (P &gt; 0.05). In the cold-dampness paralysis group, the peak intensity decreased and the area under the curve decreased, P &lt; 0.05 (See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>KOA is a chronic degenerative bone and joint disease caused by cartilage degeneration and bone hyperplasia of the knee joint. Clinically, it mainly manifests as knee joint pain and different degrees of dysfunction, some joint swelling, and fluid accumulation, which seriously affects the physical and mental health of middle-aged and elderly people. In traditional Chinese medicine, KOA is called “crane knee wind”, or “knee arthralgia”. The dialectical classification of knee arthralgia includes liver and kidney deficiency syndrome, damp-heat arthralgia syndrome, qi and blood deficiency syndrome, cold-damp arthralgia syndrome, and qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome. This study focuses on the analysis of the most common syndromes of Qi stagnation and blood stasis and cold-dampness obstruction. Both of the above belong to the category of knee arthralgia complex constitution. Qi stagnation and blood stasis are caused by stagnation of blood due to poor Qi movement. Clinical manifestations are dark color, mysterious pulse, chest tightness and sighing, stomach and abdominal pain, belching, introverted personality, melancholy, and narrow-mindedness. Obstruction of cold-dampness is mostly due to the deficiency of qi and blood in the</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters of knee osteoarthritis synovium before and after treatment ( x &#175; &#177; s)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Peak intensity (dB)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AUC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time to peak (s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean perfusion time (s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wash in slope (dB/s)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qi stagnation and blood stasis type group (n = 23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Before therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.37 &#177; 5.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >328.16 &#177; 239.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.92 &#177; 13.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.14 &#177; 5.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >After treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.44 &#177; 2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.52 &#177; 77.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.01 &#177; 30.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.40 &#177; 1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58 &#177; 0.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.461</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.826</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.465</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold-dampness obstruction type group (n = 34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Before therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.61 &#177; 4.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287.46 &#177; 164.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.07 &#177; 8.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.74 &#177; 10.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81 &#177; 0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >After treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58 &#177; 5.03<sup>△</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.36 &#177; 92.01<sup>△</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.38 &#177; 17.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.97 &#177; 5.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49 &#177; 0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.804</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.092</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.325</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: △: Compared with before treatment P &lt; 0.05.</p><p>body, strain, and the evil of cold and dampness invades and obstructs the meridians of the knee, causing the qi and blood to run poorly. The clinical manifestations are: A fat tongue, white and greasy coating, and a pulse that is tight and slow.</p><p>At present, the commonly used methods for the treatment of KOA include injection of sodium hyaluronate into the joint cavity of western medicine, acupuncture and moxibustion of traditional Chinese medicine, fumigation and washing of traditional Chinese medicine, and other external treatment methods. External treatment of traditional Chinese medicine has been widely accepted by the majority of middle-aged and elderly patients because of its obvious effect, safety, and no side effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref8">8</xref>] . The course of senile KOA is prolonged, and multiple evaluations are required during the treatment process. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score is a commonly used clinical scoring method, but it is highly subjective. Conventional X-rays can show bone lesions, but it is difficult to show soft tissue lesions such as synovium and joint capsule. In recent years, musculoskeletal ultrasound technology has progressed rapidly, which can display the sonographic changes of cortical bone and intra-articular soft tissue in real-time. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can further image microvascular blood perfusion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref9">9</xref>] . The degree of intra-articular synovial inflammation was quantitatively assessed and highly consistent with pathological changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124786-ref10">10</xref>] . In this study, through quantitative analysis, musculoskeletal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were used to observe the changes before and after treatment in elderly patients with different TCM dialectical types of knee osteoarthritis. The results shown are compared to those before treatment. After treatment, the suprapatellar sac effusion in the qi stagnation and blood stasis group was significantly reduced. In the cold-damp block type group, the suprapatellar sac effusion and the height of the meniscus were significantly reduced and the thickness of the infrapatellar fat pad and the prefemoral fat pad were significantly increased. The peak intensity and area under the curve of the knee joint synovium were significantly reduced by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, indicating that the blood perfusion in the synovium was reduced, and the inflammatory activity was controlled. The above phenomenon shows that acupuncture combined with traditional Chinese medicine fumigation and washing method has a curative effect in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in two different types of people, and the curative effect of cold-dampness obstruction type is more significant. Two-dimensional musculoskeletal ultrasound showed that there was no significant difference in synovial thickness between the two groups before and after treatment (P &gt; 0.05). The results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed that the synovial inflammation of the knee joint was improved in the cold-dampness obstruction type group, which indicated that contrast-enhanced ultrasound was more sensitive than musculoskeletal ultrasound in evaluating the efficacy of the knee joint, and could accurately assess the degree of synovial inflammation in knee osteoarthritis.</p><p>CEUS can quantitatively analyze and dynamically observe the changes in the synovial micro-blood flow of the knee joint, effectively diagnose and evaluate the degree of knee joint synovial lesions, and provide accurate imaging information for the evaluation of the efficacy of the knee joint, important clinical application.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wen, N. and Xiao, Y.C. (2023) Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound on Different Types of Knee Osteoarthritis in the Elderly. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 11, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2023.115001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124786-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, Z.F., Fang, S.Z., Chen, M., et al. (2022) Comparison of Minimally Invasive Approach and Traditional Approach of Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Medial Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury, 15, 93-98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, H.L. (2019) Clinical Observation of Dingtong Ointment in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Master’s Thesis, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mei, L.L. and Nie, L. (2021) Predictive Value of Ultrasound Time-Intensity Curve Quantitative Evaluation for Recurrence of Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma after RFA. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 41, 5204-5207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, H.N., Wu, Y.B., Ji, W., et al. (2019) Evaluation of the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Rheumatoid Arthritis Knee Joint Synovial Lesions. The 7th National Symposium on Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Medicine of the Chinese Society of Ultrasound Medicine Engineering, Nanchang, Vol. 2, 154-155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joint Surgery Group of Orthopaedic Branch of Chinese Medical Association (2018) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoarthritis (2018 Edition). Chinese Journal of Orthopedics, 38, 705-715.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orthopedic Professional Committee of China Association for the Promotion of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Joint Working Committee of the Orthopedics and Traumatology Professional Committee of the Chinese Association of Integrative Medicine (2015) Expert Consensus on Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis (2015 Edition). Traditional Chinese Medicine, 27, 4-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hejase, A.J. and Hejase, H.J. (2013) Research Methods: A Practical Approach for Business Students. 2nd Edition, Masadir Incorporated, Philadelphia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, J.Y., Chen, L.M., Guo, S.J., et al. (2021) Research Progress on the External Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis with Traditional Chinese Medicine. China Medicine Herald, 18, 43-45+64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brloznik, M., Boc, N., Cemazar, M., et al. (2021) Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Tumor Perfusion and Outcome Following Treatment in a Murine Melanoma Model. Bioelectrochemistry, 142, 107932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107932</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124786-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y., Du, H. and Jin, P. (2020) Quantitative Analysis of the Degree of Inflammatory Lesions in Rabbit Rheumatoid Arthritis Model by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. Chinese General Medicine, 18, 1908-1910.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>