<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1109787</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-124687</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Prevalence of Heart Failure among Young Patients in Al-Wahdah Teaching Hospital, Dhamar City, Yemen
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Ali Al-Huthi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dhaifullah</surname><given-names>Jayed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Qasim Salah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Heart failure is the inability of the heart to maintain adequate cardiac output to meet the demands of the body, it’s the end stage of all diseases that affect the heart and it is a major health problem in our society. It measures major challenges in its diagnosis and management. 
  Aim: This study aimed at the registry of heart failure in young patients at AL-Wahdah Hospital, Dhamar Governorate, Yemen with its prevalence, major risk factors that can precipitate this condition, and the difference in prevalence between males and females. 
  Methods: All patients in the term of heart failure with age between 20 - 40 years old were admitted to AL-Wahdah Hospital in the last two years 2019/2020. All patients are subjected to clinical evaluation, baseline ECG, results of laboratory investigations, and treatment strategies. 
  Results: According to our study, the prevalence of study group patients is 25.1% from all other groups with heart failure. Qat chewing was a major risk factor in 74%, smoking at 40.40%, hypertension at 27.90%, rheumatic heart disease at 24%, and family history at 21.20%. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the most common cause that presents in 17.30% and diabetes mellitus at 15.4% on clinical evaluation; dyspnea (NYHA class IV) was the most common presenting symptoms in 95.5%, with the prevalence of males at 58.70% and females at 41.30%. 
  Conclusion: This study about heart failure among young people registry for 104 cases (male, female), age group 20 - 40 years old, among duration between 1 January 2019 to 30 December 2020 in Al-Wehdah Teaching Hospital, Dhamar Governorate, Yemen. According to our study, the prevalence of young patients with heart failure from all other age groups with heart failure is 25.1%. In our study, most patients with heart failure are chewing Qat for further studies, as well as those patients who are already known cases of other diseases such as RHD, CHD, and DM with irregular treatment. According to our study, the most common cause of heart failure is dilated cardiomyopathy. Also, the prevalence of HF is more common in males than females.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Heart Failure</kwd><kwd> Prevalence</kwd><kwd> Yemen</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. General Introduction</title><p>Heart failure describes the clinical syndrome that develops when the heart cannot maintain adequate output, or can do so only at the expense of elevated ventricular filling pressure. In mild to moderate forms of heart failure, cardiac output is normal at rest and only becomes impaired when the metabolic demand increases during exercise or some other form of stress. In practice, heart failure may be diagnosed when a patient with significant heart disease develops the signs or symptoms of a low cardiac output, pulmonary congestion or systemic venous congestion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Because heart failure (HF) predominantly affects the elderly, most reports have appropriately focused on older patients. However, HF also afflicts younger patients, although little is known about the characteristics of these patients and their outcomes. Existing studies have largely defined “younger” as ages &lt;65 or &lt;60 years, probably because most studies have small numbers of adults in the third to sixth decades of life.</p><p>As a result, there are few data describing the symptom burden, quality of life, and hospitalization and mortality rates in HF patients aged 20 to 60 years, although in these patients, the estimates of prognosis may be most keenly sought by patients and their families [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>While ischemic heart disease (IHD) and hypertension are predominant causes of HF among older patients, the etiological makeup of HF in young adults is more heterogeneous. Common causes of HF among the young include adult congenital heart disease (ACHD), different types of cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, or alcohol- or drug-related myocardial lesions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref3">3</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Study Justification</title><p>Although heart failure is a major health problem in old age and too many studies and clinical trials are done, no such study has emerged about heart failure among younger age group. So this research will provide information to the researchers and readers about prevalence, sexual differences and risk factors associated with heart failure in young patients.</p></sec><sec id="s1_3"><title>1.3. Objectives</title><p>1) To determine the prevalence of heart failure among young patients between 20 - 40 years of age.</p><p>2) To determine the characteristics of young adults with heart failure (HF).</p><p>3) To identify potential risk factors for development of heart failure among adult patients.</p><p>4) To determine the difference between males and females presented with heart failure.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Review of Literature</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Background</title><p>Heart failure is not a single pathological diagnosis, but a clinical syndrome consisting of cardinal symptoms (e.g. breathlessness, ankle swelling, and fatigue) that may be accompanied by signs (e.g. elevated jugular venous pressure, pulmonary crackles, and peripheral edema). It is due to a structural and/or functional abnormality of the heart that results in elevated intra-cardiac pressures and/or inadequate cardiac output at rest and/or during exercise. Identification of the etiology of the underlying cardiac dysfunction is mandatory in the diagnosis of HF as the specific pathology can determine subsequent treatment. Most commonly, HF is due to myocardial dysfunction: either systolic, diastolic, or both. However, pathology of the valves, pericardium, and endocardium, and abnormalities of heart rhythm and conduction can also cause or contribute to HF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Terminology</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Heart Failure with Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction</title><p>Traditionally, HF has been divided into distinct phenotypes based on the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p>・ Reduced LVEF is defined as &lt;40%, i.e. those with a significant reduction in LV systolic function. This is designated as HFrEF.</p><p>・ Patients with an LVEF between 41% and 49% have mildly reduced LV systolic function, i.e. HFmrEF.</p><p>・ Those with symptoms and signs of HF, with evidence of structural and/or functional cardiac abnormalities and/or raised natriuretic peptides (NPs), and with an LVEF &gt; 50%, have HFpEF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Right Ventricular Dysfunction</title><p>Heart failure can also be a result of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, right ventricle mechanics and function are altered in the setting of either pressure or volume overload [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Although the main etiology of chronic RV failure is LV dysfunction-induced pulmonary hypertension, there are a number of other causes of RV dysfunction [e.g. MI, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), or valve disease].</p><p>The diagnosis is determined by a quantitative assessment of global RV function, most commonly by echocardiography, using at least one of the following measurements: fractional area change (FAC); tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE); and Doppler tissue imaging-derived systolic S0 velocity of the tricuspid annulus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref6">6</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Other Common Terminology Used in Heart Failure</title><p>Heart failure is usually divided into two presentations: chronic heart failure (CHF) and acute heart failure (AHF). CHF describes those who have had an established diagnosis of HF or who have a more gradual onset of symptoms. If CHF deteriorates, either suddenly or slowly, the episode may be described as “decompensated” HF.</p><p>This can result in hospital admission or treatment with intravenous (i.v.) diuretic therapy in the outpatient setting. In addition, HF can present more acutely. Some individuals with HF may recover completely [e.g. those due to alcohol-induced cardiomyopathy (CMP), viral myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM)]. Other patients with LV systolic dysfunction may show a substantial or even complete recovery of LV systolic function after receiving drug and device therapy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_4"><title>2.2.4. Terminology Related to the Symptomatic Severity of Heart Failure</title><p>The simplest terminology used to describe the severity of HF is the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). However, this relies solely on symptoms and there are many other better prognostic indicators in HF. Importantly, patients with mild symptoms may still have a high risk of hospitalization and death. Predicting the outcome is particularly important in advanced HF to guide selection of cardiac transplantation and device therapies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Epidemiology and Natural History of Heart Failure</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Incidence and Prevalence</title><p>In developed countries, the age-adjusted incidence of HF may be falling, presumably reflecting better management of CV disease, but due to aging, the overall incidence is increasing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> New York Heart Association functional classification of heart failure based on severity of symptoms and physical activity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Class I</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue breathlessness, fatigue, or palpitation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Class II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity results in undue breathlessness, fatigue, or palpitations.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Class III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity results undue breathlessness, fatigue, or palpitations.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Class IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms at rest can be present. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Currently, the incidence of HF in Europe is about 3/1000 person-years (all age groups) or about 5/1000 person-years in adults.</p><p>The prevalence of HF appears to be 12% of adults. As studies only usually include recognized/diagnosed HF cases, the true prevalence is likely to be higher. The prevalence increases with age: from around 1% for those aged &lt;55 years to &gt;10% in those aged 70 years or over [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Etiology of Heart Failure</title><p>The etiology of HF varies according to geography, and the following are the most common etiologies:</p><p>CAD, Hypertension, Valve disease, Arrhythmias. CMPs, Congenital heart disease, Infective Drug-induced, Infiltrative Storage disorders, Endomyocardial disease, Pericardial disease, Metabolic Neuromuscular disease with regard to ischaemic aetiology, HFmrEF resembles HFrEF, with a higher frequency of underlying CAD compared to those with HFpEF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Clinical Features of Heart Failure</title><p>1) Symptoms</p><p>a) Typical</p><p>Breathlessness, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, reduced exercise tolerance, Fatigue, tiredness and Ankle swelling.</p><p>b) Less typical</p><p>Nocturnal cough, wheezing, bloated feeling, loss of appetite, confusion (especially in the elderly), depression, palpitation, dizziness, syncope.</p><p>2) Signs</p><p>a) More specific</p><p>Elevated jugular venous pressure, hepat0-jugular reflux, third heart sound (gallop rhythm), and laterally displaced apical impulse.</p><p>b) Less specific</p><p>Weight gain (&gt;2 kg/week), weight loss (in advanced HF), tissue wasting (cachexia), peripheral oedema (ankle, sacral, scrotal), pulmonary crepitation, pleural effusion, tachycardia, irregular pulse, tachypnea, hepatomegaly, ascites, cold extremities, oliguria, narrow pulse pressure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Investigations in Heart Failure</title><p>・ Blood tests; Full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver biochemistry, cardiac enzymes in acute heart failure, BNP or NT-pro BNP, and thyroid function should be tested.</p><p>・ Chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, cardiac MRI (CMR), cardiac catheterization (rare), cardiac biopsy, Ambulatory 24-hour ECG monitoring (Holter) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. Management</title><p>1) General management</p><p>・ Education: Explanation of nature of disease, treatment and self-help strategies.</p><p>・ Diet: Good general nutrition and weight reduction for the obese, avoidance of high-salt foods and added salt, especially for patients with severe congestive heart failure.</p><p>・ Alcohol moderation or elimination of alcohol consumption: alcohol-induced cardiomyopathy requires abstinence.</p><p>・ Smoking cessation.</p><p>・ Exercise: regular moderate aerobic exercise within limits of symptoms.</p><p>・ Vaccination consideration of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination.</p><p>2) Management of acute heart failure</p><p>Acute heart failure with pulmonary oedema is a medical emergency that should be treated urgently.</p><p>The patient should initially be kept rested, with continuous monitoring of cardiac rhythm, BP and pulse oximetry. Intravenous opiates can be of value in distressed patients but must be used sparingly, as they may cause respiratory depression and exacerbation of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia, If these measures prove ineffective, inotropic agents such as dobutamine (2.5 - 10 μg/kg/min) may be required to augment cardiac output, particularly in hypotensive patients. Insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump may be beneficial in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and shock.</p><p>3) Management of chronic heart failure</p><p>The aims of treatment in chronic heart failure are to improve cardiac function by increasing contractility, optimizing preload or decreasing after load, and controlling cardiac rate and rhythm.</p><p>This can be achieved by pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments:</p><p>・ Non-pharmacological treatment as general management is discussed above in 3.6.1.</p><p>・ Pharmacological treatment:</p><p>Drugs that reduce preload are appropriate in patients with high end-diastolic filling pressures and evidence of pulmonary or systemic venous congestion, whereas those that reduce after load or increase myocardial contractility are more useful in patients with signs and symptoms of a low cardiac output (Diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, ARNI, Vasodilators, Beta-adrenoceptor blockers, Ivabradine, Digoxin, Amiodarone).</p><p>4) Other modalities of treatment</p><p>Implantable cardiac defibrillators, Resynchronisation devices, Cardiac transplantation, Ventricular assist devices (VAD) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Previous Studies</title><p>・ In previous study which was done in Sweden 2013 by Anders Barasa, Maria Schaufelberger, Georgios Lappas, Karl Swedberg, Mikael Dellborg, and Annika Rosengren and titled (Heart Failure in Young Adults: 20-Year Trends in Hospitalization, Aetiology, and Case Fatality in Sweden) there were 443,995 HF hospitalizations among adults 18 - 84 years. Of these, 4660 (1.0%) and 13,507 (3.0%) occurred in people aged 18 - 44 and 45 - 54 years (31.6% women), respectively. From the first to the last 5-year period, HF incidence increased by 50% and 43%, among people aged 18 - 34 and 35 - 44 years, respectively. Among people ≥ 45 years, incidence peaked in the mid-1990s and then decreased. Heart failure in the presence of cardiomyopathy increased more than two-fold among all age groups. Case fatality decreased for all age groups until 2001, after which no further significant decrease, 55 years was observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another more significant study Was done in Glasgow and Liverpool, United Kingdom; Boston, Massachusetts; Durham, North Carolina; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Gothenburg, Sweden 2013 by Chih M. Wong, published by American College of Cardiology and titled “Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Young and Very Young Adults with Heart Failure: The CHARM Programme (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity)”. Patients were categorized into 5 age groups: 20 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 years.</p><p>・ Results: The youngest patients with HF were more likely to be obese (youngest vs. oldest: body mass index 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 23% vs. 6%), of black ethnicity (18% vs. 2%), and have idiopathic-dilated cardiomyopathy (62% vs. 9%) (all p &lt; 0.0001). They were less likely to adhere to medication (nonadherence in youngest vs. oldest: 24% vs. 7%, p 1/4 0.001), salt intake, and other dietary measures (21% vs. 9%, p 1/4 0.002). The youngest patients were less likely to have clinical and radiological signs of HF during hospitalization. Quality of life was worse, but all-cause mortality was lowest in the youngest age group (3-year mortality rates across the respective age categories: 12%, 13%, 13%, 19%, and 31%, respectively). Compared with the referent age group of 60 to 69 years, both all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities were lower in the youngest group even after multivariable adjustment. Three-year HF hospitalization rates were 24%, 15%, 15%, 22%, and 28% in ages 20 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 years, respectively (p &lt; 0.0001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another multicenter study done by Chih M Wong 2017 and titled (Heart Failure in Young Adults Is Associated with High Mortality).</p><p>・ It shows that the incidence of HF hospitalization decreased over time among patients ≥ 65 years and increased among men aged 20 - 64 years. In the year after the index HF hospitalization, compared with older patients, younger patients were less likely to present to the emergency department (ED) (e.g., 67.2% of those aged 20 - 44 years vs 74.8% of those aged ≥ 65 years) or to be hospitalized for any reason (48.5% vs 61.2%), cardiovascular causes (28.6% vs 34.4%), or HF (14.8% vs 23.6%). Mortality rates were lower in younger patients aged 20 - 44 years but were still substantial: 3.9%, 12.4%, and 27.7% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another meta-analysis study published in 2014 by Chih M Wong l. Eur Heart J and titled “Heart Failure in Younger Patients: The Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC)” shows that when comparing young (&lt;40 Years) against elderly (≥80 years), younger patients were more likely to be male (71% vs. 48%) and have idiopathic cardiomyopathy (63% vs. 7%). Younger patients reported better New York Heart Association functional class despite more severe left ventricular dysfunction (median ejection fraction: 31% vs. 42%, all p &lt; 0.0001). Comorbidities such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation were much less common in the young. Younger patients received more disease-modifying pharmacological therapy than their older counterparts. Across the younger age groups (&lt;40, 40 - 49, and 50 - 59 years), mortality rates were low: 1 year 6.7%, 6.6%, and 7.5%, respectively; 2 years 11.7%, 11.5%, 13.0%; and 3 years 16.5%, 16.2%, 18.2%. Furthermore, 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality rates increased sharply beyond 60 years and were greatest in the elderly (≥80 years): 28.2%, 44.5%, and 57.2%, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another prospective study published in 2009 by Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo et al and titled (Racial Differences in Incident Heart Failure among Young Adults) assessed the incidence of heart failure over a 20-year period among 5115 blacks and whites of both sexes who were 18 to 30 years of age at baseline showed that heart failure developed in 27 participants (mean age at onset, 39 &#177; 6 years), all but 1 of whom were black.</p><p>・ The cumulative incidence of heart failure before the age of 50 years was 1.1% in black women, 0.9% in black men, 0.08% in white women, and 0%in white men. Among blacks, independent predictors at 18 to 30 years of age of heart failure occurring 15 years, on average, later included higher diastolic blood pressure (hazard ratio per 10.0 mm Hg, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.1), higher body-mass index, lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and kidney disease. Three-quarters of those in whom heart failure subsequently developed had hypertension by the time they were 40 years of age. Depressed systolic function, as assessed on a study echocardiogram when the participants were 23 to 35 years of age, was independently associated with the development of heart failure 10 years, on average, late. Myocardial infarction, drug use, and alcohol use were not associated with the risk of heart failure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another study done in Denmark between 1995-2012 Mia N. Christiansen, MD And titled (Age-Specific Trends in Incidence, Mortality, and Comorbidities of Heart Failure in Denmark, 1995 to 2012) show that the annual incidence rates per 10,000 person-years declined among older individuals (rates in 1995 versus 2012: 164 versus 115 in individuals &gt; 74 years, 63 versus 35 in individuals 65 - 74 years, and 20 versus 17 in individuals 55 - 64 years; p &lt; 0.0001 for all) but increased among the younger (0.4 versus 0.7 in individuals 18 - 34 years, 1.3 versus 2.0 in individuals 35 - 44 years, and 5.0 versus 6.4 in individuals 45 - 54 years; p &lt; 0.0001 for all).</p><p>・ The proportion of patients with incident heart failure ≤ 50 years of age doubled from 3% in 1995 to 6% in 2012 (p &lt; 0.0001). Sex- and age-adjusted incidence rate ratios for 2012 versus 1996 were 0.69 among people &gt; 50 years of age, and 1.52 among individuals ≤ 50 years of age; it remained essentially unchanged on additional adjustment for diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and hypertension. Standardized 1-year mortality rates declined for middle-aged patients with heart failure but remained constant for younger (&lt;45 years) and elderly (≥65 years) patients. The prevalence of comorbidities (including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation) increased, especially in younger patients with heart failure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another nationwide cohort study published in 2019b Thomas Gilljam, 1,2 Zacharias Mandalenakis, 1,2 Mikael Dellborg, 1,2 Georgios Lappas, 1 Peter Eriksson, 1,2 Kristofer Skoglund,1 Annika Rosengren1 in Sweden titled (Development of Heart Failure in Young Patients with Congenital Heart Disease) and show that an extremely high risk of developing HF (more than 100-fold) was found in patients with CHD, compared with matched controls, up to the age of 42 years. Patients with complex congenital heart malformations carried the highest risk and have to be considered as the main risk group for developing HF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another study was done in Tennessee (USA) published in 2011 and titled (Race, Sex, and Age Differences in Heart Failure-Related Hospitalizations in a Southern State) show that adult (age 20 years) inpatient hospitalization for primary diagnosis of HF (HFPD) increased from 4.2% in 1997 to 4.5% in 2006. Age-adjusted hospitalization for HF (per 10,000 population) rose by 11.3% (from 29.3 in 1997 to 32.6 in 2006). Parallel changes in secondary HF admissions were also noted. Age-adjusted rates were higher among blacks than whites and higher among men than women. The ratios of black to white by sex admitted with HFPD in 2006 were highest (9:1) among the youngest age categories (20 to 34 and 35 to 44 years). Furthermore, for each age category of black men below 65 years, there were higher HF admission rates than for white men in the immediate older age category. In 2006, the adjusted rate ratios for HFPD in black to white men ages 20 to 34 and 35 to 44 years were odds ratio, 4.75; 95% confidence interval, 3.29 to 6.86 and odds ratio, 5.10; 95% confidence interval, 4.15 to 6.25, respectively. Hypertension was the independent predictor of HF admissions in black men ages 20 to 34 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>・ Another study published in 2018 by American Heart Association titled (Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Young) showed that thirty-seven percent of HFpEF population was &lt;65 years of age. Younger age was associated with male preponderance and a higher prevalence of obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 36% in very young HFpEF versus 16% in elderly) together with less renal impairment, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension (all p &lt; 0.001). Left ventricular filling pressures and prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy were similar in very young and elderly HFpEF. Quality of life was better and death and heart failure hospitalization at 1 year occurred less frequently (p &lt; 0.001) in the very young (7%) compared with the elderly (21%) HFpEF. Compared with control subjects, very young HFpEF had a 3-fold higher death rate and twice the prevalence of hypertrophy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124687-ref20">20</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Material and Method</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Study Design</title><p>The study design was a case-series hospital-based retrospective study.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Study Area</title><p>This study was carried out in Al-Wahdah Teaching Hospital, Thamar Government, Yemen.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Study Sitting</title><p>This study was carried out in internal medicine department at Al-Wahdah Teaching Hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Study Population</title><p>Patients who had been admitted with the diagnosis of heart failure to Internal Medicine Department at Thamar University Al-Wahdah Teaching Hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Data Collection Technique: [Retrospective Data Collection]</title><p>Demographic data of study population who were admitted with the diagnosis of heart failure were registered in separate sheets.</p><p>Patient’s clinical data was documented on a sheet―focusing on symptoms and clinical emanations and the duration of the disease.</p><p>Patient’s investigation was documented on the sheet including laboratory and radiological tests.</p><p>Data that suggested risk factors such as family history, toxin exposure, smoking, and hypertension.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Duration of the Project</title><p>The previous two years (2019 and 2020).</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Inclusion Criteria for the Study</title><p>All patients aged between [20 - 40 years] had been admitted with the diagnosis of heart failure in Al-Wahdah Teaching Hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Exclusion Criteria for the Study</title><p>Those patients aged above 40 years and below 20 years were excluded from the study.</p></sec><sec id="s3_9"><title>3.9. Statistical Analysis of Result</title><p>Analysis were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (V.26.0, IBM, and Armonk, New York, USA).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Result and Discussion</title><p>Our study about heart failure among young people registry for 104 cases (male, female), age group 20 - 40 years old, among duration between 1 January 2019 to 30 December 2020 in Al_Wehdah teaching hospital, Dhamar governorate, Yemen. The results can be found in Tables 2-11 and Figures 1-3.</p><p>According to our study, the prevalence of young patients with heart failure from all other age groups with heart failure is 25.1%.</p><p>Heart failure significantly affects young people who chew Qat, smoke and have other risk factor for cardiomyopathy, RHD, HTN, DM, CHD, according to our knowledge, this is the first study in Yemen to evaluate the prevalence of heart failure among young patient.</p><p>Incidence of major causes of heart failure in our study is dilated cardiomyopathy 24%, RHD 17.30%, HTN 13.50%, IHD 7.70%, DM 6.70%, CHD 1%, when compared to study in Sweden in 2013, cardiomyopathy was also the first cause.</p><p>Another study in 2014 showed that, the patient were more likely to have idiopathic cardiomyopathy (63% vs 7%), and other comorbidities such as HTN, MI, AF, were much less common in the young.</p><p>Dilated cardiomyopathy is the most common cause of heart failure among young patients, the possible causes of DCM are, it may be idiopathic, or due to Qat chewing because of its toxic substance causing toxic myocarditis and increase blood pressure, or it may be familial.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence of young patient with HF from all respondents (n = 415)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 40 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.1%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;41 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.9%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >415</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of young respondents with HF (n = 104)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age category</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 40 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Educational level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >not mentioned</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.70%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical data of respondents (multiple answers are possible)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >N (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Dyspnea</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >99 (95.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 (61.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At rest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 (62.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orthopnea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59 (56.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >On exertion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59 (55.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Oedema</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >57 (54.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generalized</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81 (77.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower limb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (46.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Chest pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >23 (22.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Central</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (20.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peripheral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cough</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >50 (48.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palpitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12 (11.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fever</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >11 (10.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fatigue</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9 (8.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epigastric pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >8 (7.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dizziness</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6 (5.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vomiting</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5 (4.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Right hypochondrium pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >4 (3.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemoptysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3 (2.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrhea</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1 (1%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Another cause in our study is RHD 17.30%, it is cardiac inflammation and scarring triggered by an autoimmune reaction to infection by group A streptococci, in the acute stage this condition consists of pancarditis, involving inflammation of the myocardium, endocardium and epicardium, chronic rheumatic heart disease is manifested by valvular fibrosis, resulting in stenosis and/or insufficiency which eventually lead to heart failure.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Physical examination of patient with HF</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="14"  >General examination</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Body built</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Underweight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overweight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Heart rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tachycardia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bradycardia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Blood Pressure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypotension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Hepatomegaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Cardiopulmonary examination</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Crepitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >All over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Heart sounds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.30%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> ECG, CXR, ECHO findings</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >ECG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >not specific</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CXR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.40%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >ECHO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Done</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not done</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.30%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Laboratory investigation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >N (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CBC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >62 (59.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >24 (23.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >18 (17.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >LFT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >20 (19.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >14 (13.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >70 (67.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >RFT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >56 (53.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >18 (17.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High Creatinine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (15.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High Urea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (12.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >30 (28.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Lipid profile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9 (8.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >0 (0%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >95 (91.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >S. Electrolyte</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >11 (10.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >17 (16.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (15.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low Potassium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (4.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low Sodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (2.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >76 (73.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >RBS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >30 (28.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >18 (17.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1 (1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >55 (52.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >ESR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6 (5.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2 (1.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2 (1.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >49 (90.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CRP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >4 (3.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >8 (7.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No data found</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >92 (88.5%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Using of regular treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.90%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The characteristics chief complaint of a young adult with heart failure, the patient commonly come with dyspnea 95.2%, edema 46.2%, chest pain, and cough, other less common symptoms are palpitation, fever, dizziness, and right hypochondriac pain.</p><p>According to our study male, more likely to be affected by heart failure at younger ages 58.70% and females 41.30%.</p><p>We faced many difficulties during data collection. The patient files did not provide adequate information, vital signs were not recorded in the file upon patient arrival at the hospital, and investigations were not always available, such as echography, which patients may not have taken. We hope these difficulties will be addressed in the future.</p><p>People need access to information about major risk factors of heart failure in order to avoid it. Responsibility lies with doctors who treat patients to decrease the prevalence of heart failure.</p><p>Additionally, the study results may have been affected by unmeasured confounding variables, such as socioeconomic status and post-hospital care.</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Pharmacological treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diuretics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.40%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beta Blocker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spiranalactone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACE Inhibitors</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspirin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heparin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digitalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antibiotics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.40%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atrovastatin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clopidagrel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Warfarin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PPI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ARBS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insulin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Albumin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dopamine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amlodipine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>2</sub> Therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dobutamine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Reach to definitive etiology</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.50%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> The common etiologies lead to HF</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dilated cardiomyopathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rheumatic heart disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ischemic heart disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diabetes mellitus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valvular heart disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anemic heart failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atrial Fibrillation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital heart disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion and Recommendation</title><p>The conclusion of this study includes:</p><p>- The most common cause was dilated cardiomyopathy.</p><p>- Most patients with heart failure were chewing Qat and need further studies.</p><p>- Patients who already had the underlying disease such as RHD, CHD, HTN and DM were under irregular treatment.</p><p>- Males were commonly affected by HF than females.</p><p>- Further studies are needed to detect the common cause of dilated cardiomyopathy in this age group.</p><p>- We need further studies to determine the effect of Qat chewing on cardic disease and its effect on medication and educate the patients about the effect of bad habits such as Qat chewing and smoking on cardiac disease.</p><p>- We need to educate the patients about the importance of taking medication regularly, and take regular follow-up.</p><p>- Screening for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease for early prevention can be conducted to as a form of reducing the prevalence of heart failure.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Al-Huthi, M.A., Jayed, D. and Salah, M.Q. (2023) Prevalence of Heart Failure among Young Patients in Al-Wahdah Teaching Hospital, Dhamar City, Yemen. Open Access Library Journal, 10: e9787. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109787</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>List of Abbreviations</title><p>HF: Heart Failure</p><p>IHD: Ischemic Heart Disease</p><p>ACHD: Adult Congenital Heart Disease</p><p>LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction</p><p>LV: Left Ventricle</p><p>RV: Right Ventricle</p><p>HFrEF: Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction</p><p>HFmrEF: Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction</p><p>HFpEF: Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction</p><p>NPs: Natriuretic Peptide</p><p>ARVC: Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricle Cardiomyopathy</p><p>FAC: Fractional Area Change</p><p>TAPSE: Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion</p><p>CHF: Chronic Heart Disease</p><p>MI: Myocardial Infraction</p><p>AHF: Acute Heart Failure</p><p>CMP: Cardiomyopathy</p><p>IV: Intra venous Injection</p><p>PPCM: Peripartum Cardiomyopathy</p><p>NYHA: New York Heart Association</p><p>CV: Cardiovascular</p><p>CAD: Coronary Artery Disease</p><p>BNP: Brain Natriuretic Peptide</p><p>NT-PRO: N-Terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide</p><p>MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging</p><p>CMR: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</p><p>ECG: Electrocardiogram</p><p>BP: Blood Pressure</p><p>ACE: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme inhibitor</p><p>ARBs: Angiotensin Receptors Blockers</p><p>ARNI: Angiotensin Receptors Neprilysin Inhibitor</p><p>VAD: Ventricular Assist Devices</p><p>ED: Emergency Department</p><p>CHARM: Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity</p><p>MAGGI: Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure</p><p>CHF: Congenital Heart Failure</p><p>HFPD: Hospitalization for Primary Diagnosis</p><p>SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences</p><p>RHD: Rheumatic Heart Disease</p><p>HTN: Hypertension</p><p>DM: Diabetes Mellitus</p><p>IHD: Ischemic Heart Disease</p><p>AF: Atrial Fibrillation</p><p>DCM: Dilated Cardiomyopathy</p><p>PND: Paroxysmal Nocturnal Dyspnea</p><p>HR: Heart Rate</p><p>CXR: Chest X-Ray</p><p>ECHO: Echocardiography</p><p>LVH: Left Ventricle Hypertrophy</p><p>RVH: Right Ventricle Hypertrophy</p><p>CBC: Complete Blood Count</p><p>HB: Hemoglobin</p><p>LFT: Liver Function Test</p><p>T. BILIRUBIN: Total Bilirubin</p><p>AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase</p><p>ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase</p><p>RFT: Renal Function Test</p><p>S. ELECTROLYTE: Serum Electrolyte</p><p>RBS: Random Blood Sugar</p><p>ESR: Elevated Sedimentation Rate</p><p>CRP: C-Reactive Protein</p><p>PPI: Proton Pump Inhibitor</p><p>O<sub>2</sub>: Oxygen</p><p>PCI: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124687-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Newby, D.E., Grubb, N.R. and Bradbury, A. (2014) Cardiovascular Disease. In: Brian, N.R. and Walker, R., Eds., Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine, 22nd Edition, Elsevier, London, 546.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, C.M., et al. (2013) Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Young and Very Young Adults with Heart Failure: The CHARM Programme (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 62, 1845-1854.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barasa, A., et al. (2013) Heart Failure in Young Adults: 20-Year Trends in Hospitalization, Aetiology, and Case Fatality in Sweden. European Heart Journal, 35, 25-32.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McDonagh, T.A., et al. (2021) 2021 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. European Heart Journal, 42, 3599-3726.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galderisi, M., Cosyns, B., Edvardsen, T., Cardim, N., Delgado, V., Di Salvo, G., et al. (2017) Standardization of Adult Transthoracic Echocardiography Reporting in Agreement with Recent Chamber Quantification, Diastolic Function, and Heart Valve Disease Recommendations: An Expert Consensus Document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging, 18, 1301-1310. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex244</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arrigo, M., Huber, L.C., Winnik, S., Mikulicic, F., Guidetti, F., Frank, M., Flammer, A.J. and Auschwitz, F. (2019) Right Ventricular Failure: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Cardiac Failure Review, 5, 140-146.  
https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2019.15.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gorter, T.M., van Veldhuisen, D.J., Bauersachs, J., Borlaug, B.A., Celutkiene, J., Coats, A.J.S., et al. (2018) Right Heart Dysfunction and Failure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Management. Position Statement on Behalf of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. European Journal of Heart Failure, 20, 1637. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caraballo, C., Desai, N.R., Mulder, H., Alhanti, B., Wilson, F.P., Fiuzat, M., et al. (2019) Clinical Implications of the New York Heart Association Classification. Journal of the American Heart Association, 8, e014240.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014240</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunlay, S.M. and Roger, V.L. (2014) Understanding the Epidemic of Heart Failure: Past, Present, and Future. Current Heart Failure Reports, 11, 404-415.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-014-0220-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MeyerMeyer, S., Brouwers, F.P., Voors, A.A., Hillege, H.L., de Boer, R.A., Gan-sevoort, R.T., van der Harst, P., Rienstra, M., van Gelder, I.C., van Veldhuisen, D.J., van Gilst, W.H. and Van der Meer, P. (2015) Sex Differences in New-Onset Heart Failure. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 104, 342-350.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-014-0788-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Riet, E.E., Hoes, A.W., Wagenaar, K.P., Limburg, A., Landman, M.A. and Rutten, F.H. (2016) Epidemiology of Heart Failure: The Prevalence of Heart Failure and Ventricular Dysfunction in Older Adults over Time. A Systematic Review. European Journal of Heart Failure, 18, 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.483</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ralston, S.H., et al. (2018) Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine. 23rd Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anders Barasa, et al. (2014) Heart Failure in Young Adults: 20-Year Trends in Hospitalization, Aetiology, and Case Fatality in Sweden. European Heart Journal, 35, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, C.M., et al. (2017) Heart Failure in Young Adults Is Associated with High Mortality: A Contemporary Population-Level Analysis. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 33, 1472-1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, C.M., et al. (2014) Heart Failure in Younger Patients: The Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC). European Heart Journal, 35, 2714-2721. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bibbins-Domingo, K., et al. (2009) Racial Differences in Incident Heart Failure among Young Adults. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1179-1190.  
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807265</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christiansen, M.N., et al. (2017) Age-Specific Trends in Incidence, Mortality, and Comorbidities of Heart Failure in Denmark, 1995 to 2012. Circulation, 135, 1214-1223. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025941</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gilljam, T., et al. (2019) Development of Heart Failure in Young Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: A Nation-Wide Cohort Study. Open Heart, 6, e000858.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000858</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Husaini, B.A., et al. (2011) Race, Sex, and Age Differences in Heart Failure-Related Hospitalizations in a Southern State. Circulation: Heart Failure, 4, 161-169.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.110.958306</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124687-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pfeffer, M.A., Shah, A.M. and Borlaug, B.A. (2019) Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Perspective. Circulation Research, 124, 1598-1617.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.313572</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>