<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJO</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Orthopedics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-3008</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojo.2023.134016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJO-124432</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Retrospective Analysis of the Patterns and Outcomes of Tile B and Tile C Pelvic Fractures in Cameroon
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chunteng</surname><given-names>Theophile Nana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tsiagadigui</surname><given-names>Tsiagadigui Jean Gustave</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ngo</surname><given-names>Yamben Marie-Ange</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Batchom</surname><given-names>Daudet</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bombah</surname><given-names>Freddy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muluem</surname><given-names>Kenedy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mokake</surname><given-names>Divine Ngomba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ekani</surname><given-names>Boukar Mahamat</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Mahamat</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takou</surname><given-names>Bougoue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Andre</surname><given-names>Gaetan Simo Wambo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tagakou</surname><given-names>Mboula</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Fotso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ndasi</surname><given-names>Henry</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pius</surname><given-names>Fokam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>157</fpage><lpage>167</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Pelvic fractures constitute about 2% - 8% of all fractures. This incidence may rise up to 25% in poly-traumatised patients. These fractures have a high mortality rate due to the fact that they occur usually as a result of high energy trauma, and most of the injured are poly-traumatised with concomitant haemodynamic instability. The aim of this study is to describe the patterns of injury and complications of unstable pelvic fractures treated in a level III hospital in Cameroon. 
  Methodology: This was a hospital based retrospective analysis of files of patients admitted and treated for unstable pelvic fractures at the Regional Hospital Limbe within a period of 10 years (from 1
  <sup>st</sup> of January 2009 to 31
  <sup>st</sup> of December 2018). 
  Results: A total of 139 cases of pelvic fractures were identified, amongst which 77 were unstable; 68 were finally analyzed. The ages ranged from 18 to 80 years with a mean of 39 &#177; 5 years. The age group from 20 - 40 years was most represented (58.88%, n = 40). There were 45 males and 23 females giving a sex-ratio of 2:1. Road traffic injuries accounted for most of the cases (73.53%, n = 50). Forty-five (66.2%) were classified Tile B and 23 (33.82%) were Tile C, and 15 cases were open fractures (22.06%). Associated lesions were recorded in 30 cases, fractures of the lower extremity being the most common (33.33%, n = 10). Most of the cases were definitively treated surgically (80.89%, n = 55). The most common complications were surgical site infections (23.64%, n = 13). 
  Conclusion: Unstable pelvic fractures are relatively common. Young males in the age group 20 - 40 years are the most affected, and the most common cause of injury was road traffic accident. Surgical site infections, pressure ulcers, severe anaemia and thrombo-embolism are common complications.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Unstable</kwd><kwd> Pelvic Fracture</kwd><kwd> Patterns</kwd><kwd> Complications</kwd><kwd> Cameroon</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Pelvic fractures are defined as a break in the bony structures that constitute the pelvic ring. These bones consist of the ilium, the sacrum, the ischium, the pubis, and the coccyx [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref1">1</xref>] . Pelvic fractures constitute about 2% - 8% of all fractures, though this incidence may rise up to 25% in poly-traumatised patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Pelvic fractures can be classified as either stable or unstable using several classification systems, the Tile’s classification being one of the most commonly used systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref5">5</xref>] . Based on the Tile’s classification, Tile A fractures are considered as stable while Tile B and Tile C are considered as unstable fractures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Unstable pelvic fractures have a mortality rate of up to 19% - 31% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref8">8</xref>] . This high mortality is due to the fact that unstable pelvic fractures occur usually as a result of high energy trauma, and most of these patients present with associated injuries to the head, chest, abdomen, and extremities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref9">9</xref>] . Concomitant haemodynamic instability associated with the pelvic fractures increases the mortality rate to 20% - 50% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Patients with unstable pelvic fractures are best acutely managed by a multidisciplinary trauma team comprising a trauma surgeon, orthopaedic surgeon, radiologist with interventional radiology capabilities, urologist and a neurosurgeon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref11">11</xref>] . This multidisciplinary team is lacking in most hospital settings in low and low-middle-income countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref13">13</xref>] . Few studies have focussed on the patterns and outcomes of unstable pelvic fractures treated in poor resource settings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref16">16</xref>] . The aim of this study is therefore to describe the patterns of injury, and outcome of unstable pelvic ring fractures treated in a level III hospital in a limited resource country in Africa.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>This was a hospital-based retrospective analysis of files of patients admitted and managed for unstable pelvic fractures at the Regional Hospital Limbe within a period of 10 years (from 1<sup>st</sup> of January 2009 to 31<sup>st</sup> of December 2018). The Regional Hospital Limbe is a level III health institution located in the South West region of Cameroon. It has a capacity of 200 beds, an emergency department functioning 24 hours/day and a surgical ward with 26 beds capacity. This ward has 5 surgical specialists including one orthopaedic surgeon, one general surgeon, one urologist, and two ENT surgeons. The definitive diagnosis of an unstable pelvic fracture was jointly made by the Orthopaedic Surgeon (main author) and the Radiologists.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Population and Sampling</title><p>The study involved all patients who were admitted and treated at the Regional Hospital Limbe for unstable pelvic fracture within the 10 years’ period. The sampling was done in a consecutive manner.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Selection Criteria</title><p>Inclusion criteria: All patients with unstable pelvic fractures that were admitted and treated in the Regional Hospital Limbe, within the study period were included in the study.</p><p>Exclusion criteria: Files of patients with incomplete relevant information, and files of those who received initial surgical care from other health facilities were excluded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Study Procedure</title><p>Ethical and administrative issues</p><p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, and administrative clearances were obtained from the Regional Hospital Limbe and the South west regional delegation of health.</p><p>Data Collection and analysis</p><p>Files of patients with unstable pelvic fractures that were treated within the study period were retrieved from the records office. Registers of the emergency department, the surgical ward and the operating theatre were exploited to complement data on patients’ clinical states on arrival and progress during hospitalisation. Variables that were considered for analysis include: age, sex, mechanism of injury, diagnosis, classification, associated injuries, complications, the number of days of hospitalisation, and outcome (discharged, referred, or dead). Data was entered in well-structured pre-tested data entry form and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 and Microsoft excel.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>A total of 139 cases of pelvic fractures were identified, amongst which 77 cases were unstable representing 55.40% of all pelvic fractures. Of these 77 cases of unstable pelvic fractures, 9 were excluded due to incomplete relevant information. Hence, 68 files were considered for analysis in this study.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Epidemiological Characteristics, Injury Patterns and Clinical Presentations</title><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the ages of the patients ranged from 18 to 80 years with a mean age of 39 &#177; 5 years. The age group of 20 - 40 years was the most represented</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Epidemiological characteristics and injury patterns</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ITEMS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VARIABLE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FREQUENCY</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Type of unstable pelvic fracture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tile B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tile C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Open pelvic fractures</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Closed pelvic fracture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Age groups (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 - 80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Level of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commercial motorcycle rider</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peasant farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Street vendor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Civil servant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retired</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Mechanism of injury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Road traffic crash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Falls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crush (other than road traffic crash)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Assault</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Direct impact from falling objects (walls, trees, rocks)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Mode of transport to health facility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ambulance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commercial vehicles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Motorcycles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Private vehicles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Time of arrival at the health facility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Within 1 hour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 to 6 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beyond 6 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(58.88%, n = 40). There were 45 males and 23 females giving a male to female ratio of 2:1. Most of the patients had attained both primary and secondary school education (51.47%, n = 35). However, a good number of them had tertiary education (30.88%, n = 21). The majority of the patients (79.41%, n = 54) had informal occupation (farmer, business, bike-rider, builder, carpenter, hairdresser, driver, maid, and others).</p><p>Road traffic injuries accounted for most of the cases (73.53%, n = 50), followed by falls (11.76%, n = 8), crush (7.35%, n = 5) and direct impact from falling objects (4.41%, n = 3). Among the 68 cases of unstable pelvic ring fractures, 45 (66.2%) were classified Tile B and 23 (33.82%) were Tile C. A total of 15 cases were open fractures (22.06%) and the rest were closed fractures (77.94%, n = 53). Most of the victims arrived the hospital within 1 hour following injury (61.77%, n = 42). Only a few were transported by ambulances (10.29%, n = 7).</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, over a third of the cases had hypovolemic shock on arrival at the hospital (33.82%, n = 23), a few had a Glasgow coma score of less than 14 (2.94%, n = 2) while majority had Injury Severity Scores between 9 and 16 (70.59%, n = 48). Associated injuries were recorded in more than a third of the cases (44.12%, n = 30), fractures of the lower extremity being the most common (33.33%, n = 10).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Methods of Surgical Pelvic Stabilisation</title><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, all the cases were initially stabilised using either a pelvic</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical characteristics of the patients on admission</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ITEMS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VARIABLES</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FREQUENCY</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Hemodynamic state on admission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypovolemic shock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Glasgow coma score on admission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 to 13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 and 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Injury severity score on admission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 to 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Greater than 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Associated injuries (n = 30)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower extremity fractures</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper extremity fractures</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blunt chest injury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bladder injury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urethral injury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blunt abdominal injury with hemoperitoneum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Head injury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ano-rectal injuries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vaginal injuries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Treatment methods, complications and outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ITEMS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VARIABLES</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FREQUENCY</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial pelvic stabilization method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pelvic binder External fixation Pelvic clamp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 8 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.29 11.76 2.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Definitive Surgical stabilization methods (n = 55)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Closed/open reduction and External fixation (EF) plus ilio-sacral screw</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Open reduction and internal fixation(IF) with plates and screws plus ilio-sacral screw</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combined External and internal fixations plus ilio-sacral screw</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Post-operative complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thromboembolic events</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe anaemia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical site infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pressure ulcers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urinary tract infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length of hospital stay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 30 days 30 to 60 days 60 to 90 days More than 90 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 33 3 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.11 48.53 4.41 2.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Final status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Discharged</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Referred to pursue more specialized surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dead</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.59</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>binder (85.29%, n = 58), external fixators (11.76%, n = 8), or a pelvic clamp (2.94%, n = 2). No case underwent emergency embolization. Two cases had pelvic packing to control haemorrhage. Most of the cases were definitively treated surgically (80.89%, n = 55) while 13 were definitively treated non-operatively. Modalities of definitive surgical management included external fixation plus ilio-sacral screw (60.82%, n = 34), open reduction and internal fixation (IF) with plates and screws plus ilio-scaral screw (18.18%, n = 10), combined external and internal fixations plus ilio-sacral screws (20.00%, n = 11).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Length of Hospital Stay and Complications</title><p>Length of Hospital stay varied from 21 days to 120 days with a mean of 36.54 &#177; 17 days. Majority stayed in the hospital for 30 to 60 days (48.53%, n = 33). Complications were recorded in over half of the cases (67.65%, n = 46), the most common being pressure ulcers (27.27%, n = 15) and surgical site infections (23.64%, n = 13) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Some cases were eventually referred to pursue more specialised surgeries (urological repairs, plastic reconstruction) in other hospitals (11.76%, n = 8), while majority fared well and were discharged from hospital (67.65%, n = 46). Cases of death were equally recorded during treatment (20.59%, n = 14) due to sepsis, thromboembolism and/or severe anaemia.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This study had as aim to describe the patterns of injury and complications of unstable pelvic ring fractures treated in a level III hospital in a limited resource country in Africa. A total of 139 cases of pelvic fractures were identified, amongst which 77 cases were unstable pelvic fractures representing 55.40% of all pelvic fractures. Of these 77 cases of unstable pelvic fractures, 9 files were excluded due to incomplete relevant information. Hence, 68 files were considered for analysis in this study.</p><p>A total of 77 cases of unstable pelvic fractures were identified from hospital records, within a 10-year period. After excluding 9 files due to incomplete data, 68 cases were considered for further analysis. Unstable pelvic fractures represented 55.40% of the cases of pelvic fractures which were admitted and treated. This value is higher than those reported in Japan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref17">17</xref>] , and India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref18">18</xref>] . This can be explained by the fact that a majority of the cases in this study were due to very high energy trauma from road traffic crashes involving mainly commercial motor-vehicles and motorcycles which are the most widely used commercial means of transportation in urban and rural communities in the south west region of Cameroon. Most of these drivers and motorcyclists are known for their reckless driving and lack of implementation of road traffic safety measures, thereby exposing them to fatal accidents and injuries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref19">19</xref>] . Moreover, the Limbe regional hospital is an urban referral hospital that may have received mostly patients with severe pelvic fractures from other hospitals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The mean age at which these injuries occurred was 39 &#177; 5 years old, and the male gender in the age group of 20 - 40 years (30.9%) were the most affected. These findings are similar to those obtained by other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref17">17</xref>] . This could be explained by the fact that young males are naturally more active and mostly engaged in risky activities including reckless driving and non-respect of the safety rules on roads. Some authors found higher mean ages of over 45 years in patients with pelvic ring fractures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref22">22</xref>] . This can be explained by the fact that these were epidemiological community based studies which didn’t consider only unstable pelvic ring fractures.</p><p>Regarding the mechanism of injury, it was observed that road traffic accidents were the most frequent causes of injuries, accounting for 73.53% of the cases, and mostly involved transportation vehicles like cars, trucks and motorcycles. This is consistent with results from other studies in which these injuries were caused by motor vehicles accidents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref23">23</xref>] . Regarding the type of unstable pelvic ring injuries, Tile B was found in 45 cases (66.18%) and Tile C in 23 cases (33.82%). This is similar to other studies that found Tile B to be more common than Tile C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref22">22</xref>] . In this study, 15 cases (22.06%) of open unstable pelvic fractures were recorded. These cases were characterized by fractures with direct communication between the fracture haematoma and the external environment, including the rectum and the vagina. Although it is a rare occurrence (with an estimated rate of 2% to 4% of all traumatic pelvic ring lesions) they predominantly occur in young adults and motorcycle users, and are due to high-energy accidents like in this study. It should be noted that open pelvic injuries are associated with a high incidence of complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref24">24</xref>] . Open pelvic fractures usually occur in poly-traumatised victims presenting with associated visceral, thoracic, uro-genital, spine and lower extremity lesions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref26">26</xref>] . Regarding the initial states of the cases on admission, 23 (33.82%) had hemorrhagic shock and 48 (70.59%) had Injury Severity Scores between 9 and 16. This is because unstable pelvic fractures occur as a result of high energy trauma, and most of these patients present with concomitant haemodynamic instability which may increases mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Associated injuries were present in 30 cases (44.12%). The most common associated injuries were lower extremity fractures, urogenital injuries, and blunt abdominal injuries with hemoperitoneum. These injuries together with brain and chest injuries constitute the most common injuries associated with pelvic ring fractures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref28">28</xref>] . Initial pelvic stabilization was mostly done using pelvic binders in 58 cases (85.29%), and external fixators in 8 cases (11.76%). These emergency bony stabilisation methods including concomitant surgeries like laparotomies, chest tube placements, evacuation of intracranial haemorrhages, external stabilization of long bone fractures, have been proven to reduce mortality in patients with pelvic ring fractures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref29">29</xref>] . Pelvic embolization as an emergency procedure was not done in these cases because of lack of technical facility and inadequate human resources.</p><p>Definitive surgical stabilisation was done in 55 cases while 13 were treated non-operatively. The reasons for non-operative treatment include financial constraints, unstable clinical conditions, and advanced age. The most common post-operative complications encountered were pressure ulcers, surgical site infections severe anaemia and thromboembolic events. These complications were mostly recorded in patients who were admitted for more than 30 days. A total of 14 (20.59%) deaths were recorded, while 46 cases (67.65%) were successfully treated and discharged. The rate of in-hospital mortality in this study is comparable to the 20% reported by other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref10">10</xref>] . However, this mortality rate might go up to 50% in case of open compound fractures and resource-limited setting where medical equipment and resuscitation materials are limited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref26">26</xref>] . Although the functional outcomes following pelvic injuries have improved with modernised diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, it is not the case in poor resource settings where the lack of these modalities makes the management challenging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124432-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The proportion of unstable pelvic fractures in this study was relatively high. A third of the cases presented on admission with hypovolemic shock. Associated injuries were frequent (lower extremity fractures, urogenital injuries, and blunt abdominal injuries with hemo-peritoneum). Complications occurred in over half of the cases, and the in-hospital mortality rate was high. A multidisciplinary trauma team, and the use of adequate diagnostic and therapeutic facilities, are absolutely necessary to improve the quality of care for patients with unstable pelvic fractures in hospitals with limited resource settings.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Limitation</title><p>This study was retrospective in its design, therefore, we could not report the prospective functional outcome of the cases. Up to and 9 cases were excluded in the analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>All authors declared that they have no competing interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge the Director, Dr NYENTI A., the staff of the emergency, and surgical departments of the Regional Hopsital Limbe, for their collaboration and help during this research.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nana, C.T., Gustave, T.T.J., Marie-Ange, N.Y., Daudet, B., Freddy, B., Kenedy, M., Ngomba, M.D., Mahamat, E.B., Mahamat, A., Bougoue, T., Wambo, A.G.S., Mboula, T., Fotso, C., Henry, N. and Fokam, P. (2023) A Retrospective Analysis of the Patterns and Outcomes of Tile B and Tile C Pelvic Fractures in Cameroon. Open Journal of Orthopedics, 13, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2023.134016</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124432-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCormack, R., Strauss, E.J. and Tejwani, N.C. (2010) Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Fractures. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 68, 281-291.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, G.J.C., Damasceno, E.R., Dinhane, D.I., et al. (2017) Epidemiology of Pelvic Ring Fractures and Injuries. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 52, 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.05.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olivier, N.G.F., Paul, F., Achille, M., et al. (2014) Pelvic Ring Fractures Epidemiological, Clinical Journal Africain d’Imagerie Médicale, 4, 35-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohanty, K., Musso, D., Powell, J.N., et al. (2005) Emergent Management of Pelvic Ring Injuries: An Update. Canadian Journal of Surgeons, 48, 49-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, W.R. and Resnik, C.S. (1990) Fracture of the Pelvis Current Concepts of Classification. AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology, 155, 1169-1175. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.155.6.2122661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coccolini, F., Stahel, P.F., Montori, G., et al. (2017) Pelvic Trauma WSES Classification and Guidelines. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 12, Article No. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marvin, T. (1996) Acute Pelvic Fractures: I. Causation and Classification. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 4, 143-151. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-199605000-00004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pohlemann, T., Bosch, U., G&amp;auml;nsslen, A. and Tscherne, H. (1994) The Hannover Experience in Management of Pelvic Fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 305, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199408000-00010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siegmeth, A., M&amp;uuml;llner, T., Kukla, C. and Vécsei, V. (2000) Accompanying Injuries in Severe Pelvic Trauma. Der Unfallchirurg, 103, 572-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050585</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duchesne, J., Bharmal, H., Dini, A., Islam, T., Schmieg, R. and Simmons, J. (2009) Open-Book Pelvic Fractures with Perineal Open Wounds: Asignificant Morbid Combination. The American Surgeon, 75, 1227-1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480907501215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grubor, P., Milicevic, S., Biscevic, M. and Tanjga, R. (2011) Selection of Treatment Method for Pelvic Ring Fractures. Medical Archives, 65, 278-282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olasinde, A.A., Oluwadiya, K.S., Oginni, L.M., Akinyoola, A.L. and Orimolade, E. (2004) Pelvic Fractures Management in a Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma, 3, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.4314/njotra.v3i1.29221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fola, O.K., Guifo, M.L., Tsiagadigui, J.G., Tolefac, P., Biyouma, M., Djoko, I. and Essomba, A. (2019) Locked Book Pubic Symphysis: A Case Report in a Resource-Limited Setting in Sub-Sahara Africa. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 64, 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.09.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diouf, A.B., Gueye, A.B., Dembele, B., Daffe, M., Dia, R., Sarr, L., Diop, P.S., Coulibaly, N.F., Sane, A.D. and Dieme, C.B. (2018) Trauma of the Pelvic Ring: Epidemiological and Etiopathogenic Aspects. Biomedical Journal of Scientific &amp; Technical Research, 4, 3787-3790. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.04.0001016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohammed, O.B. and Idris, S.A. (2009) Patterns of Pelvic and Acetabular Injury among Sudanese Patients. Sudan JMS, 4, 375-383. https://doi.org/10.4314/sjms.v4i4.50998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferede, B., Ayenew, A. and Belay, W. (2021) Pelvic Fractures and Associated Injuries in Patients Admitted to and Treated at Emergency Department of Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia. Orthopedic Research and Reviews, 13, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S311441</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yasuo, K., Hisashi, O., Daisuke, S., Kenichi, T., Tsuyoshi, M., Kohei, N. and Hideaki, N. (2017) Functional Outcome of Patients with Unstable Pelvic Ring Fracture: Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Prognostic Factors. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684322</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghosh, S., Aggarwal, S., Kumar, P. and Kumar, V. (2019) Functional Outcomes in Pelvic Fractures and the Factors Affecting them—A Short Term, Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 10, 896-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nana, C.T., Pius, F., Martin, M.N., Mbongnu, M., Movuh, S.D., Bombah, F.M., Henry, N., Ngunde, P.J. and Chichom-Mefire, A. (2021) Epidemiological and Clinical Pattern of Open Fractures of Long Bones of the Lower Limbs in the South-West Region of Cameroon: A 5-Year Review. Open Journal of Orthopedics, 11, 278-287. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2021.119026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chichom-Mefire, A. and Fokou, M. (2013) Epidemiology of Paediatric Injury in Low Income Environment: Value of Hospital Based Data Prior to the Institution of a Formal Registration System. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery, 10, 265-270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobbe, P., Hockertz, I., Sellei, R.M., Reilmann, H. and Hockertz, T. (2012) Minimally Invasive Stabilization of Posterior Pelvic Ring Instabilities with a Transiliac Locked Compression Plate. International Orthopaedics, 36, 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1279-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jezek, M. and Dzupa, V. (2012) The Influence of Patient Age and Mechanism of Injury on the Type of Pelvic Fracture: Epidemiological Study. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 79, 65-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freitas, C.D., Garotti, J.E.R., Nieto, J., Guimar&amp;atilde;es, R.P., Ono, N.K., Honda, E., et al. (2013) Houve mudanas na incidência e na epidemiologia das fraturas do anel pélvico nas últimas décadas? Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 48, 475-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2012.10.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grotz, M.R., Allami, M.K., Harwood, P., Pape, H.C., Krettek, C. and Giannoudis, P.V. (2005) Open Pelvic Fractures: Epidemiology, Current Concepts of Management and Outcome. Injury, 36, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferrera, P.C. and Hill, D.A. (1999) Good Outcomes of Open Pelvic Fractures. Injury, 30, 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00246-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G&amp;auml;nsslen, A. and Lindahl, J. (2013) Evaluation Tools and Outcomes after Osteosynthesis of Unstable Type B and C Pelvic Ring Injuries. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae &amp;Ccaron;echosl, 80, 305-320.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiyam, R., Lalchandani, R., Satyaprakash, S. and Godara, N. (2016) Uncontrolled Haemorrhage in Pelvic Fracturesd—Can the Inevitable Be Avoided? Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 19, 54-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.08.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, M.J., Lee, J.G. and Lee, S.H. (2018) Factors Predicting the Need for Hemorrhage Control Intervention in Patients with Blunt Pelvic Trauma: A Retrospective Study. BMC Surgery, 18, Article No. 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0438-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balogh, Z., King, K.L., Mackay, P., McDougall, D., Mackenzie, S., Evans, J.A., et al. (2007) The Epidemiology of Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Population-Based Study. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 63, 1066-1073. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124432-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nana, C.T., Ngo-Yamben, M.A., Fokam, P., et al. (2022) Functional Outcome of Unstable Pelvic Fractures Treated in a Level III Hospital in a Developing Country: A 10-Year Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17, Article No. 198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03088-3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>