<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Clinical Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-284X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijcm.2023.144015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJCM-124402</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Is There Any Relationship between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Urinary Incontinent?
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mariko</surname><given-names>Asahi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saiji</surname><given-names>Kondo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Atsushi</surname><given-names>Kusaba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Akihiko</surname><given-names>Maeda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koji</surname><given-names>Kanzaki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institute of Joint Replacement and Rheumatology, Zama General Hospital, Zama, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>205</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: In my daily practice as a hip surgeon, I have observed some circumstances where urinary incontinence (UI) improves after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated UI symptoms before and after THA at our facility and considered the factors that influence UI. 
  Patients and Method: The subjects were 113 female patients who underwent primary THA in our facility. An anterior lateral approach was used in all cases. Using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), we conducted an investigation into the presence of UI before and 2 weeks after THA. An improvement in UI was defined as a decrease of 1 point or more, a worsening is defined as an increase of 1 point or more. 
  Results: The responses from the 113 subjects were analyzed. Of the 113 patients, prior to THA, UI was prevalent among 59 patients and was absent among 54 patients. In the group where UI was prevalent, it improved after THA in 50 patients (85%), remained unchanged in 5 (8%) and worsened in 4 (7%). In the group where UI was absent, 49 patients (91%) remained unchanged and UI appeared in 5 (9%). Compared with the non-prevalence group (62 patients), the prevalence group (50 patients) had a noticeable improvement rate of internal rotation of the surgical hip side (P &lt; 0.01). 
  Conclusion: UI greatly reduces the quality of life (QOL). In this study, there is a possibility that THA improves UI.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Total Hip Arthroplasty</kwd><kwd> Urinary Incontinence</kwd><kwd> Obturator Internus</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The majority of Japanese osteoarthritis patients have secondary osteoarthritis mainly due to congenital dislocation of the hip joint or acetabular dysplasia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref1">1</xref>] . Hip joint disorders from osteoarthritis greatly reduce the quality of life (QOL), and QOL improves markedly within three months after total hip arthroplasty (THA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref2">2</xref>] . The prevalence of hip osteoarthritis is particularly high among middle-aged and elderly women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref3">3</xref>] . The term lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) which was introduced in 1994, many adults experience, and the prevalence of these symptoms increases with age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref4">4</xref>] . LUTS are highly prevalent in Japan, and few subjects seek treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref5">5</xref>] . UI is significantly under-diagnosed, and many people suffer from life-disrupting consequences of a condition that is largely treatable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref6">6</xref>] . Furthermore, it is expected that patients with hip osteoarthritis are hesitant to say they have LUTS symptoms to a hip surgeon. Although in such a situation, in daily practice as a hip surgeon, we have observed that there are some circumstances in which UI improves after THA. THA is a great option that relieves pain and improves mobility, and as a result, improves QOL. The improvement in symptoms is amazing for patients suffering from hip dysfunction and UI.</p><p>We acknowledge that Tamaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref7">7</xref>] first submitted the information that patients with UI before THA improved by 64% 3 months after THA using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Okumura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref3">3</xref>] reported that for patients with hip-joint disorder, hip-joint treatment could prove to also be a useful treatment for UI. Baba et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref8">8</xref>] reported that symptoms of UI were significantly improved in anterior approach (AA) group and aggravated in the posterior approach (PA) group. In our institution, anterior lateral approach was adopted at the time of THA. We investigated whether UI improves after THA in our facility.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>Information on the existence of UI and hip function limitations was collected on 113 female patients with an average age of 63.5 years. All patients had suffered from hip osteoarthritis and underwent primary THA in the period from July 2019 to December 2021. 11 of them were given simultaneous bilateral THA. All the arthroplasty procedures employed the anterolateral muscle-sparing approach in a 60-degree half-lateral position. No dislocation and no infection were reported in two weeks after THA. And patients were immediately followed by postoperative rehabilitation on the first day. Rehabilitation included both active and passive motion exercises on the affected joints. Patients were allowed to put their full weight on these joints. Prior to surgery and 2 weeks after, we requested all members of the group to fill out the ICIQ-SF.</p><p>An improvement of UI was defined as a decrease of 1 point or more, a worsening is defined as increase of 1 point or more. Range of movement (ROM) was measured before and after surgery, and the number of births, age, body mass index (BMI), intraoperative bleeding, and surgery time were listed. No patient received medication for UI. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to evaluated difference, and the level of statistical significance applied was P &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Patient Background</title><p>Of the 113 patients, prior to THA, UI was prevalent among 59 (52%) patients (incontinent group) and was absent among 54 (48%) patients (continent group).</p><p>There was no significant difference in the number of births, age, body mass index (BMI), intraoperative bleeding, or surgery time.</p><p>Concerning ROM, there was no significant difference in flexion, abduction, adduction, external rotation, or internal rotation. However, there was a significant difference in extension (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>In the incontinent group, the symptoms of UI improved in 50 (85%) patients, remained unchanged in 5 (8%) and worsened in 4 (7%) after THA.</p><p>In the continent group, the symptoms of UI remained unapparent in 52 (96%) patients, and worsened in 2 (4%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Among the 113 patients, the number of patients whose UI improved was 50 (group A), and whose UI remained unchanged or worsened was 63 (group B). Characteristics of the 2 groups are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. There were no significant differences in age, height, number of births, unilateral or bilateral THA. There were significant differences in weight and BMI (P &lt; 0.05, P &lt; 0.01 respectively). In response to the question, “when does urine leak?” for the patients who had UI symptoms before surgery, 44 (75%) replied “when coughing or sneezing” the most frequently (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Changing of urinary incontinence after total hip arthroplasty</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Improvement</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No change</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Worsening</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incontinent group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 (85%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Continent group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (96%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Group A (improvement) 50 patients; Group B (no change + worsening) 63 patients; patients’ back ground</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.6 &#177; 9.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.6 &#177; 10.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.5 &#177; 6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.9 &#177; 5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.7 &#177; 11.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.7 &#177; 8.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5 &#177; 4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5 &#177; 3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of births</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral THA:bilateral THA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45:5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57:6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Evaluation of Hip Range of Movement</title><p>-Group A-</p><p>Flexion significantly improved from 85.5 &#177; 20.1 before THA to 91.6 &#177; 9.5 at 2 weeks after (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>Extension significantly improved from −3.4 &#177; 7.8 before to 0.6 &#177; 5.4 at 2 weeks after (P &lt; 0.01).</p><p>Internal rotation significantly improved from 13.2 &#177; 12.9 before to 27.8 &#177; 11.9 at 2 weeks after (P &lt; 0.01).</p><p>There was no significant difference in abduction, adduction, or external rotation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>-Group B-</p><p>Extension significantly improved from −2.5 &#177; 7.9 before to 2.8 &#177; 6.2 at 2 weeks after (P &lt; 0.01).</p><p>Abduction significantly improved from 13.3 &#177; 0.9 before to 15.9 &#177; 4.8 at 2 weeks after (P &lt; 0.01).</p><p>Internal rotation significantly improved from 17.2 &#177; 15.9 before to 26.4 &#177; 11.3 at 2 weeks after (P &lt; 0.01).</p><p>There was no significant difference in flexion, adduction, or external rotation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Comparison between Group A and Group B in Range of Movement</title><p>Improvement in ROM was compared between the 2 groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Flexion, extension and internal rotation were significantly improved at 2 weeks after THA in group A. In group B, extension, abduction and internal rotation were significantly improved at 2 weeks after THA. The difference between unilateral and bilateral arthroplasty was compared, and there were no significant differences in terms ROM. We determined improvement rate by dividing the ROM</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Group A: Evaluation of hip ROM</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Before</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >After 2 weeks</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.5 &#177; 20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.6 &#177; 9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.4 &#177; 7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abduction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.4 &#177; 8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3 &#177; 5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adduction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1 &#177; 5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9 &#177; 3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >External rotation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6 &#177; 9.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1 &#177; 7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal rotation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2 &#177; 12.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.8 &#177; 11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Group B: Evaluation of hip ROM</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Before</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >After 2 weeks</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.5 &#177; 18.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.7 &#177; 8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.5 &#177; 7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8 &#177; 6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abduction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9 &#177; 4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adduction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8 &#177; 4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6 &#177; 2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >External rotation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3 &#177; 10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8 &#177; 9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal rotation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2 &#177; 15.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4 &#177; 11.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>before THA by the ROM after 2 weeks THA. Using the improvement rate of ROM, statistically there was a significant difference between 2 groups, only in internal rotation (P &lt; 0.05). Improvement rate of internal rotation was significantly higher in group A.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Case Presentation</title><p>The patient was a 55-year old woman who was suffering from right hip pain because of her osteoarthritis of the hip. According to her questionnaire before THA, she leaked a moderate amount of urine two or three times a week. And her leaking urine interfered with her life by level 4. Her Points of ICIQ-SF was 10 before THA. 2 weeks after the THA, she never leaked urine, and it interfered with her life by revel 1. Her point of ICIQ-SF was 1, 2 weeks after the THA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence</title><p>Kikuchi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref9">9</xref>] investigated the prevalence of UI using ICIQ-SF in 676 Japanese men and women aged &gt; 70 years who were living in the Tsurugaya area of Sendai, one of the major cities in the Tohoku area of Japan. In the study, the prevalence of UI was 25% (34% in women and 16% in men), and the shown high physical activity level was independently related to a lower self-reported prevalence of UI in a community-dwelling elderly population aged &gt; 70 years.</p><p>Tamaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref7">7</xref>] reported the prevalence rate of UI in patients with hip osteoarthritis before THA was 43%, using ICIQ-SF.</p><p>Baba et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref8">8</xref>] reported the prevalence rate of UI in patients with hip osteoarthritis before THA was 47% using ICIQ-SF.</p><p>Okumura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref3">3</xref>] reported the prevalence of UI in patients with hip osteoarthritis before THA was 67% using a core lower urinary tract symptom score (CLSS).</p><p>In our study, the prevalence of UI in patients with hip osteoarthritis before THA was 52%.</p><p>In the case of hip joint disorders, physical activity levels might be lower, and the prevalence of UI in patients with hip dysfunction may be higher than in people without hip dysfunction.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Type of Urinary Incontinence</title><p>Hannestad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref10">10</xref>] reported half of the incontinent women were experiencing symptoms of stress incontinence (SUI) alone, symptoms of urge incontinence (UUI) alone affected only one in ten, while mixed incontinence (MUI) was</p><p>reported by one in three in 6501 of UI patients. In our study, stress incontinence was the most frequent. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) Bo K reported that pelvic floor muscle training is effective in the treatment of female stress incontinence (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence and therefore, it is recommended as a first-line therapy.</p><p>The stress continence system includes the sphincteric closure mechanism consisting of urethral striated muscle, urethral smooth muscle, and vascular elements and the remainder of the bladder support system consisting of the anterior vagina, endopelvic fascia, tendinous arch of levator ani, and bony pelvis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref11">11</xref>] . The consequence of levator ani muscle damage might depend on which or how many elements have been damaged [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref12">12</xref>] . If the tendinous arch of levator ani falls, the ipsilateral side of the vagina falls, carrying with it the bladder and the urethra, and thus contributing to urinary incontinence. The tendinous arch of levator ani is at the bottom of the fascia obturator.</p><p>Tamaki et al. focused on the obturator internus muscle, which originates from the pelvic floor and has a close relationship with the levetorani muscle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref7">7</xref>] . Okumura et al reported that THA is performed to improve hip-joint function and recovery of levator ani function that is connected to the obturator internus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Baba et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref8">8</xref>] reported that since the short external rotator may have been atrophied due to hip joint dysfunction before surgery, support of the pelvic organs and UI may be improved if the strength of this muscle group recovers. And, symptoms of UI were significantly improved in the anterior approach group without dissecting the short external rotators, and aggravated in the posterior approach group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The superior gemellus, inferior gemellus, and obturator internus muscle have been regarded as a single muscle unit and called the “rotator triceps muscle” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref13">13</xref>] . The gemelli converge onto the tendon of insertion of the obturator internus muscle and because the three muscles terminate at the same common bony attachment, the medial aspect of the greater trochanter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref13">13</xref>] . Their functions are also common; they act synergistically to rotate the pelvis and/or femur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref13">13</xref>] . The obturator internus muscle arise over a wide area of the lesser pelvis, converges to the lesser sciatic notch, changes its course, and is inserted into the medial aspect of the greater trochanter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>In our institution, all the arthroplasty procedures employ the anterolateral muscle-sparing approach in the 60-degree half lateral position. At the time of stem insertion, we may cut the conjoint tendon as little as possible if it is hard to insert the stem.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Improvement Rate of Urinary Incontinence</title><p>In our study, UI improved in 50 (85%) patients. In other studies, Tamaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref7">7</xref>] reported the symptoms of UI ameliorated in 52 (64%) patients which was done by the muscle-sparing direct anterior approach using ICIQ-SF. Okumura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref3">3</xref>] reported in total, patients were better than improved (72%). The rate of cured and improved patients was 76%, for stress UI, 100% mixed UI, and 50% urge UI. Baba et al. reported UI improved after THA in 8 patients (22%), slightly improved in one (2.8%) in the anterior approach group using the distal part of the Smith-Petersen approach. In the posterior approach group, by dissecting the short external rotators, UI improved after THA in one (2.5%). Patients with hip disorder have limited range of motion, and those muscles around hip reduce tension. In our study, improvement rate of internal rotation of group A (improvement of UI group) was high. Think about why UI improved after THA, and the internal rotation movement became possible after that, external rotators including the obturator internus are able to stretch, and preserve the original musculature. As a result, the obturator internus can exert tension. The obturator internus is closely related to the levator ani. In addition, thinking of the approach of THA which preserves the obturator internus, it could be advantageous for the improvement of UI.</p><p>Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem that leads to significant suffering among women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref14">14</xref>] . Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in the treatment of female stress (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence and, therefore, it is recommended as a first-line therapy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref11">11</xref>] . Hip joint disorders from osteoarthritis and UI both greatly reduce the QOL. And both ages of onset are the same for middle age and older [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref7">7</xref>] . Tamaki et al. hypothesizes that a loose pelvic floor could be improved by THA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124402-ref7">7</xref>] . In our study, 85% of the THA patients’ UI improved just 2 weeks after THA. That suggests THA might have the same effect as pelvic floor muscle training and might be more immediately effective than muscle training.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limitations</title><p>This study had some limitation. Firstly, because the study was only two weeks, the long-term results are unclear. Secondly, a pain scale wasn’t used; therefore the patients’ pain levels were unknown.</p><p>Thirdly, only orthopedic doctors got involved in this study, no urologists were involved.</p><p>Fourthly, the number of patients studied was low. Finally, the anterior and posterior THA approaches were not compared.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, UI doesn’t affect a patient’s life span; however, it affects their QOL later in the future. Our study has shown that THA can be beneficial for treating UI. We would like to continue this study more using X-rays to consider how patients’ femoral offset changes after THA.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Asahi, M., Kondo, S., Kusaba, A., Maeda, A. and Kanzaki, K. (2023) Is There Any Relationship between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Urinary Incontinent? International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14, 197-205. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2023.144015</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124402-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakamura, S., Ninomiya, S. and Nakamura, T. (1989) Primary Osteoarthritis of the Hip Joint in Japan. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 24, 190-196.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198904000-00021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laupacis, A., Bourne, R., Rorabeck, C., Feeny, D., Wong, C., Tugwell, P., et al. (1993) The Effect of Elective Total Hip Replacement on Health-Related Quality of Life. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 75, 1619-1626.https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199311000-00006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okumura, K., Yamaguchi, K., Tamaki,T., Oinuma, K., Tomoe, H. and Akita K. (2017) Prospective Analyses of Female Urinary Incontinence Symptoms Following Total Hip Arthroplasty. International Urogynecology Journal, 28, 561-568.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3138-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irwin, D.E., Milsom, I., Hunskaar, S., Reilly, K., Kopp, Z., Herschorn, S., et al. (2006) Population-Based Survey of Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder, and Other Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Five Countries: Results of the EPIC Study. European Urology, 50, 1306-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Homma, Y., Yamaguchi, O., Hayashi, K. and Neurogenic Bladder Society Committee. (2006) Epidemiologic Survey of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Japan. Journal of Urology, 68, 560-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coyne, K.S., Zhou, Z., Thompson, C. and Versi, E. (2003) The Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life of Stress, Urge and Mixed Urinary Incontinence. BJU International, 92, 731-735. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04463.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tamaki, T., Oinuma, K., Shiratsuchi, H., Akita, K. and Iida, S. (2014) Hip Dysfunction-Related Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Analysis of 189 Female Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. International Journal of Urology, 21,729-731.https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baba, T., Homma, Y., Takazawa, N., Kobayashi, H., Matsumoto, M., Aritomi, K., et al. (2014) Is Urinary Incontinence the Hidden Secret Complications after Total Hip Arthroplasty? European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, 24, 1455-1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1413-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kikuchi, A., Niu, K., Ikeda, Y., Hozawa, A., Nakagawa, H., Guo, H., et al. (2007) Association between Physical Activity and Urinary Incontinence in a Community-Based Elderly Population Aged 70 Years and over. European Urology, 52, 868-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hannestad, Y.S., Rortveit, G., Sandvik, H. and Hunskaar, S. (2000) A Community-Based Epidemiological Survey of Female Urinary Incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Tr&amp;oslash;ndelag. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 1150-1157.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00232-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B&amp;oslash;, K. (2004) Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Is Effective in Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, but How Does It Work? International Urogynecology Journal, 15, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1125-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Margulies, R.U., Hsu, Y., Kearney, R., Stein, T., Umek, W.H. and DeLancey, J.O.L. (2006) Appearance of the Levator Ani Muscle Subdivisions in Magnetic Resonance Images. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 107, 1064-1069. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000214952.28605.e8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shinohara, H. (1995) Gemelli and Obturator Internus Muscles: Different Heads of One Muscle? Anatomical Record, 243, 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092430116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124402-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stein, T.A. and DeLancey, J.O.L. (2008) Structure of the Perineal Membrane in Females. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 111, 686-693. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163a9a5</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>