<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2023.144020</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-124282</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Ultrasound and Thermal Pasteurization on Physicochemical Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Juice Extracted from Ripe and Overripe Pineapple
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Asraful</surname><given-names>Alam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mrityunjoy</surname><given-names>Biswas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tanjim</surname><given-names>Ahmed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Ashrafuzzaman Zahid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahfujul</surname><given-names>Alam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mustafa</surname><given-names>Kamrul Hasan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bikramjit</surname><given-names>Biswas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Roxana</surname><given-names>Zaman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Agro-Product Processing Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>300</fpage><lpage>314</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  It has become necessary to assess how food processing methods affect qualitative qualities due to the increased consumer awareness of the health benefits 
  of various nutrients in food. In the current study, the effects of ultrasound treatment (37
  &amp;deg;C, 5 min), pasteurization (90&amp;deg;C, 5 min), and their combination 
  on quality parameters, including pH, total soluble solids
   
  (TSS
  s
  ), titratable 
  acidity
   
  (TA), color values (L*, a*,
   
  b*), ascorbic acid
   
  (AA), total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (DPPH), of pineapple juice from ripe and overripe pineapples were assessed. Color values (L*), ascorbic acid (AA), total phenolic content (TPC), and DPPH radical scavenging activity in all juice samples that were sonicated alone and in combination with pasteurization improved significantly (p &lt; 0.05), but the TSS
   and
   color value (a* and b*) 
  decreased in comparison to the control. Whereas pH and acidity did not
   change significantly (p &lt; 0.05). Pasteurization significantly (p &lt; 0.05) reduces these attributes
  ,
   but sonicated samples significantly (p &lt; 0.05) improved numerous quality parameters and antioxidant activity, notably in ripe juice. Overall, pasteurization degraded these liquids but sonication, either alone or in combination with it, was advantageous for preserving their quality by retaining nutrients.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pineapple Juice</kwd><kwd> Ultrasound</kwd><kwd> Pasteurization</kwd><kwd> Phenolic Compounds</kwd><kwd> Antioxidant Activity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Pineapple is a significant tropical fruit (Ananas comosus L.), which is a family member of Bromeliaceae and is primarily consumed in the form of processed foods like juices. The sweet and tart flavor of pineapple juice is preferred by consumers. This distinct flavor of pineapple is produced by a combination of phenolic chemicals, furanone, amino acids, and amines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref1">1</xref>] . Antioxidant components in this product, including carotenoids, bromelain, phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid, and flavonoids, have been linked to its protective properties. Bromelain (BRM), an active proteolytic enzyme found in pineapple, is employed in medications to treat thrombosis, inflammatory diseases, and malignant tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref2">2</xref>] . Generally, pineapple contains 80% - 85% water and 10% - 14% sugar content and it is highly accepted all over the world for its high nutritional content. It is commonly consumed fresh, as well as having its meat and juice employed in the manufacture of various products in agro-processing companies. Due to its health-promoting benefits and customer demand, however, agro-processing companies have begun using both ripe and overripe pineapple as a functional ingredient in fruit juice, fruit salad, pies, cakes, ice cream, yogurt, and other products. For such industrial activities, it is essential to have knowledge of the changes in pineapple properties throughout storage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref3">3</xref>] . Besides microbial contamination, enzymatic breakdown is a common cause of spoilage in pineapple goods, which consumers often reject [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref4">4</xref>] . In order to reduce this loss, different processing methods or treatments should be applied to pineapple juice as well as pineapple flesh.</p><p>Thermal pasteurization is frequently used to destroy dangerous germs and some enzymes in the juice. Due to the use of high heat in the pasteurization process, the nutritional and sensory qualities of pasteurized juice may be slightly affected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref5">5</xref>] . Significant causes of quality deterioration have been found as non-enzymatic browning reactions and pigment loss, both of which can be triggered by heat treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref6">6</xref>] . Consequently, there is a significant demand for innovative treatments that have less of an effect on the nutritional value and general quality of food. Sonication (ultrasound) treatment, a novel technique regarded as cost-effective, straightforward, dependable, and environmentally friendly, has been investigated for usage in a variety of applications, including fruit juice processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref9">9</xref>] . Recent research on the effect of ultrasonication on cantaloupe melon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref10">10</xref>] , kasturi lime juice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref7">7</xref>] , apple juice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref11">11</xref>] , and orange juice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref12">12</xref>] has demonstrated that it is a suitable method of juice processing, capable of preventing more losses in valuable nutrients and reducing the microbial load than thermal processing. The primary benefits of ultrasonic processing are a higher cloud value, lower energy consumption, and less nutritional and taste losses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref13">13</xref>] . Thermosonication can substitute thermal processing and is more efficient than ultrasound treatment or pasteurization alone. Several juices, including tomato juice, are available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref14">14</xref>] , star fruit juice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref15">15</xref>] , pear juice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref16">16</xref>] , and apple juice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref17">17</xref>] showing an increase in fruit juice quality following thermosonication.</p><p>There is a scarcity of knowledge on ripe and overripe pineapple fruit juice, despite the several issued papers on the effects of ultrasonography, pasteurization, and their combination on fruit juices. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of ultrasound, pasteurization, and their combination on the physicochemical properties, phytochemical properties, and antioxidant activity of pineapple juice at different maturity stages.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sample Preparation</title><p>Ripe and overripe pineapples were bought from a local market in Jashore, Bangladesh. According to Shamsudin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref18">18</xref>] and Ramallo and Mascheroni [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref19">19</xref>] , fruits were gently divided into two separate groups based on their maturity (ripe and overripe). Under flowing water, all pineapples were washed. The fruits were then peeled and pressed mechanically using an electrical juice separator (BL25C46, Guangdong Midea Electric Appliances Co., Ltd., Foshan, China). In order to extract the juice and remove the solid particles, the flesh was squeezed and passed through a double layer of filter cloth. The juices were then kept at −18˚C in a (400 &#177; 2 ml) glass jar for later analysis. Frozen fruit juices that were ripe or overripe were collected, defrosted, and given time to warm up before being pasteurized and sterilized using ultrasound. After that, the juices are divided into four categories (Group 1: Fresh raw pineapple juice without any treatment; Group 2: Juice treated with pasteurization; Group 3: Juice treated with ultrasonication, Group 4: Juice treated with combined pasteurization and ultrasonication treatment).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Design</title><p>The following treatments were applied to the various groups. Control groups consisted of fresh pineapple juice that had not been treated. Juices were processed by pasteurization and ultrasonication treatments described by Bavisetty and Venkatachalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref20">20</xref>] with slight modification. For pasteurization process, juices were transported into sterilized glass jars (400 &#177; 2 ml). Juices were then pasteurized (≈90˚C) using a temperature-controlled water bath with a basin made of stainless steel. The water bath (Human Lab Instrument Co., Ltd., Korea) included thermostatic control, temperature resistance up to 120˚C, an operational temperature range of 25˚C - 100˚C with a precision of &#177;1˚C, and 220 V/50 Hz electrical supply after the pasteurization was finished, samples were gathered and quickly cooled to ambient temperature (25˚C &#177; 1˚C). The samples were then prepared for ultrasonic therapy.</p><p>The ultrasound therapy was carried out using an ultrasound bath (Branson Model 2510E-DHT ultrasonic cleaner, CT 06813, USA), operating at a frequency of 40 kHz with a maximum input power of 185 W (the internal dimensions: 16 &#215; 15.5 &#215; 14.5 inch) for 5 minutes. To prevent any interaction from light with the samples, all treatments were carried out in complete darkness. A sample of untreated juice was similarly preserved and used as a comparison standard (non-sonicated). Stainless steel container-mounted piezoelectric sandwich-type transducers convert high-frequency electricity into ultrasonic waves of the required frequency. Pineapple juice was placed in glass jars and placed in the center of the ultrasonic cleaning solution. During the ultrasonic treatment, the temperature of the demineralized water was 37˚C &#177; 1˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Pineapple juices were also treated with combined treatment of pasteurization and ultrasonication. Same parameters were also set here for both pasteurization and ultrasonication as described earlier. The processed juice was stored at −18˚C until further analysis. For each treatment, three samples were created. The experiment was carried out three times.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Physicochemical Properties</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Estimation of pH, Total Soluble Solid (˚Brix), Titratable Acidity (TA)</title><p>A pH meter was utilized to determine the sample solution’s pH (FE20-FiveEasy, Mettler Toledo, Inc., Greifensee, Switzerland). Before analysis, the pH meter was calibrated with buffer solutions of pH 7.0 and pH 4.0. The pH was then determined at 20˚C by adding 25 mL of the sample solution to a 100 mL beaker and stirring (20 rpm) continuously with a mechanical stirrer (Ms-H380-Pro., DLAB Scientific, China).</p><p>Using a digital refractometer, total soluble solid (TSS) in ˚Brix was measured (HI 96801 refractometer, China). Each evaluation was completed at 27˚C, and the refractometer’s prism was meticulously cleaned with demineralized water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>20 mL of pineapple juice and 80 mL of demineralized water were added to a 250 mL beaker in order to determine the total acidity of the juice (TA). Then, this mixture was titrated to a 1% alcoholic phenolphthalein (one gram in one</p><p>hundred milliliters of pure alcohol) standard solution to 0.1 N NaOH (four grams of NaOH dissolved in one thousand milliliters of demineralized water), to the point of a light pink color. Redd et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref22">22</xref>] estimated titratable acidity (TA) by converting the volume of NaOH to grams of citric acid per 100 milliliters of pineapple juice. Titratable acidity (TA) was computed using Formula (1).</p><p>Titratableacidity = V titre &#215; 0.067 &#215; 0.1 NNaOH &#215; 100 m (1)</p><p>where, V<sub>titre</sub> is titre volume of NaOH, and m is volume of Pineapple juice (ml). Each analysis was conducted in triplicate.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Estimation of Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C)</title><p>The quantity of ascorbic acid in pineapple juice was determined using a validated analytical method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref23">23</xref>] . 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol measures the amount of ascorbic acid present and the redox indicator’s capacity to be scavenged by it (coloring). Using the sample’s ascorbic acid as a marker, the concentration was measured while 2% oxalic acid was present (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>). 20 mL of the substance and 100 mL of oxalic acid were homogenized three times for a total of 10 seconds. The substance was homogenized, then filtered before being titrated with dye solution. Additionally, the following Equation (2) was used for calculation.</p><p>Ascorbicacid ( mg / 100 mljuice ) = titre &#215; concentration &#215; 100 extractusedforestimation &#215; volumeofsampleusedforestimation (2)</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Physical Properties</title>Estimation of Color Value<p>By using a Minolta colorimeter (CR-400, Minolta Camera Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and the Hunter Lab color system, the color of pineapple juice that had been treated was determined. Before the measurement, the colorimeter was calibrated using demineralized water (L = 100, a = 0, b = 0). The color value was determined using a glass cuvette (3.5 &#215; 4 &#215; 1.5 cm<sup>3</sup>) containing processed pineapple juice. Three Hunter parameters, “L*” (lightness), “a*” (redness and greenness), and “b*” (yellowness and blueness), were measured, and L*, a*, and b* values were used to determine total color differences.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Phytochemical Properties</title><sec id="s2_5_1"><title>2.5.1. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)</title><p>Alothman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref24">24</xref>] devised a method for determining the TPC of pineapple juice. 200 μL of diluted pineapple juice and 1 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent are mixed. The FC phenol reagent was tenfold diluted with pure water before to use. After holding the pineapple juice—Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent combination at 25˚C &#177; 0.5˚C for 5 minutes, 800 μL of 7.5% Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> was added. The prepared solution was properly mixed and left at ambient temperature for two hours. The absorbance was then measured at 765 nm using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (UV-1600PC, Shanghai, China).The results were expressed as mg GAE/100 mL of juice using the mean of three measurements.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5_2"><title>2.5.2. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity</title><p>A method described by Sadiq et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref25">25</xref>] was slightly modified to test the free radical scavenging capacity of controlled and treated pineapple juice. A known quantity of the juice (2 mL) was added with 2 mL of a DPPH solution (0.2 mM in ethanol) before being incubated at ambient temperature (25˚C &#177; 1˚C) in the dark for 30 minutes. For blank, the identical process was carried out, but ethanol was used in place of the juice. Using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (UV-1600PC, Shanghai, China), the reduction in absorbance was detected at 517 nm. The DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined by using Equation (3):</p><p>DPPHfreeradicalscavengingactivity ( % ) = A 0 − A 1 A 0 &#215; 100 (3)</p><p>where, A<sub>0</sub> is the absorbance of the control, and A<sub>1</sub> is the absorbance of the juice.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Each experiment was carried out three times. At p &lt; 0.05, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to find significant mean differences. The information was presented as mean &#177; standard deviation (SD). Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was utilized to examine post hoc differences in mean values. The statistical tool for agricultural research (STAR) application was used to calculate the statistics.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Result and Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Physicochemical Properties of Differently Processed Juices</title>Effects of Treatments on pH, Total Soluble Solids (TSSs) and Titratable Acidity (TA)<p>The pH, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity of the juice are related to its sensory quality; hence, alterations in these three qualities may have a negative effect on the juice’s sensory quality. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows pH, TSS, and TA values for differently treated juices. The pH of ripe and overripe pineapple juices before and after processing did not differ significantly (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). The pH values for treated ripe and overripe pineapple juice varied from 4.70 to 4.73 and 4.52 to 4.53 respectively. The pH of the treatment solution may change as a result of ultrasonication due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the aqueous medium, such as hydrogen peroxide, nitrate, and nitrite, as described by Supeno and Kruus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref26">26</xref>] . The pH of grape juice treated with ultrasonic waves at 20 kHz and 1500 watts at temperatures ranging from 32˚C to 45˚C did not change much [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref27">27</xref>] . In a recent experiment, Bhat et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref7">7</xref>] also reported that the pH of kasturi lime juice was not significantly affected by ultrasonic treatment (p &gt; 0.05) in any of the treatments.</p><p>One important pineapple quality factor that affects the sensory qualities of pineapple juice is total soluble solids (TSSs) as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b). Mainly</p><p>depending on the fruit’s maturity. Initially overripe fruit juice had a higher TSS (11.5˚Brix) than ripe fruit (9.70˚Brix), but it decreased after treatment. The combination of sonication and pasteurization led to a greater drop than sonication alone (p &lt; 0.05), but the alterations were minor. This was due to the fact that ripe juice contained much fewer fermentable sugars than overripe juice, including d-glucose, d-fructose, and sucrose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref28">28</xref>] . Saeeduddin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref16">16</xref>] also found no discernible differences in pear juice after conventional and ultrasound pasteurization at varied temperatures.</p><p>Bavisetty and Venkatachalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref20">20</xref>] also reported, the reduction of TSS in wax apple juice samples sonicated with subsequent pasteurization was greater than with sonication alone. All juices showed parallel titratable acidity (TA) changes when processed, independent of maturity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)). In this study, there was no considerable (p &lt; 0.05) increase in TA for pineapple juices after sonication and pasteurization treatments. Similar patterns were discovered in the juice of Haematocarpus validus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref29">29</xref>] . These results agreed with the previous reports of Bavisetty and Venkatachalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref20">20</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Physical Appearances of Processed Juice</title>Effects of Different Treatments on Color Values (L*, a*, and b*)<p>Fruit juice’s color is a crucial sensory characteristic that can indicate nutritional quality or loss and affect consumer perception [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref30">30</xref>] . Color is one aspect that consumers may use to determine the efficiency of fruit juice or pulp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref31">31</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> displays the findings on the impact of the sonication and pasteurization processes on the color values (L*, a*, and b*) of pineapple juice. Results showed that when pineapple juice was treated with ultrasound, there was a substantial (p &lt; 0.05) decrease in a* value (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)) and b* value (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)) but slightly increase in L* value (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). Juice that was ripe at the start was lighter than juice that was overripe. Whereas pasteurization and sonication jointly decreased L*, with pasteurization having an especially significant impact on the lowering of L* for overripe juice, sonication alone had a less significant impact on L* of ripe or overripe juice across all examined sonication durations (p &lt; 0.05). According to Aadil et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref21">21</xref>] , homogenizing by sonication raised L* due to inadequate precipitation of suspended particles, resulting in a high cloud value. A rise in temperature induced both enzymatic and nonenzymatic browning processes, which resulted in the decomposition of ascorbic acid and the caramelization of sugar, lowering L* [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref32">32</xref>] . Similar findings were reported by Bavisetty and Venkatachalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref20">20</xref>] who found that large reduction of L* value in ripe and overripe wax apple juice when processed by pasteurization and sonication. Cheng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref33">33</xref>] found the color shift in sonicated and carbonated guava juice, as well as significant changes in all color parameters, despite the fact that the naked eye was unable to identify these differences. Fonteles et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref10">10</xref>] found that the breakdown of cell membranes during sonication results in the production of carotenoid-protein complexes, which produce a change in color.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Biochemical Alterations in Juices with Various Processing Methods</title><p>Bioactive substances for example flavonoids, anthocyanins, phenolics, ascorbic acid, and other antioxidants, add nutritional value to fruit juices. In overripe and ripe pineapple juices, antioxidant activity, ascorbic acid levels, and total phenolic content levels were all influenced by ultrasonication and pasteurization.</p><sec id="s4_3_1"><title>4.3.1. Effects of Different Treatments on Ascorbic Acid (AA)</title><p>Ascorbic acid significantly aids in the prevention of numerous cardiovascular and cancer disorders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref34">34</xref>] . Heat and oxygen are the primary causes of its deterioration. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> displays the results on the influence of various treatments on the ascorbic acid content of pineapple juices. Results showed that significant (p &lt; 0.05) all sonicated juice samples contained more vitamin C than the control samples. Since sonication is a nonthermal procedure, certain degradation changes may be induced by cavitation effects; nonetheless, the loss of beneficial chemicals was shown to be negligible when compared to pasteurization. Ascorbic acid also breaks down at high temperatures, as can be seen in the reduction of ascorbic acid during pasteurization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref20">20</xref>] . For instance, Zou and Jiang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref35">35</xref>] reported that processed carrot juice using ultrasound (40 kHz, 0.5 W/cm<sup>2</sup>) for 20 or 40 minutes. When the juice was processed for 20 and 40 minutes, the amount of ascorbic acid went up by 3.61 and 8.17 percent, respectively, compared to the fresh juice. Aadil et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref21">21</xref>] reported that ascorbic acid concentration of sonicated apple juice treated for 60 and 90 minutes increased significantly (p &lt; 0.05). According to research by Abid et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref11">11</xref>] , samples processed for 60 and 90 minutes had significantly higher ascorbic acid contents than samples processed for 30 minutes (p &lt; 0.05). Previous studies on sonicated kasturi lime juice also showed</p><p>an increase in vitamin C levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref7">7</xref>] . This rise in vitamin C might be caused by cavitation, which releases oxygen that has become trapped [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref33">33</xref>] . Our findings also agree with Bavisetty and Venkatachalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref20">20</xref>] , who discovered that sonicated wax apple samples retained higher ascorbic acid content compared to control.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_2"><title>4.3.2. Effect of Different Treatments on Total Phenolic Content (TPC)</title><p>Phenolic substances are very favorable to human health because they significantly lower the risk of several physiological and degenerative illnesses. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> displays the findings on the impact of various treatments on the total phenolic compounds of pineapple juice. All sonicated juice samples displayed a significant increase in total phenols compared to the control sample. Previous studies on sonicated kasturi lime juice showed a substantial increase in TPC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref7">7</xref>] . The breakdown of cell walls during ultrasound may be responsible for the rise in phenolic compounds, which makes it easier for intracellular components to be released. Moreover, this rise in phenolic compounds may be explained by the reaction between the aromatic ring of polyphenols and the hydroxyl radicals produced during sonification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref37">37</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_3"><title>4.3.3. Effect of Different Treatments on DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity</title><p>Vitamin C and phenolic compounds play a major role in the DPPH radical-scavenging activity and antioxidant capacity of fruits and vegetables. These substances have the ability to scavenge dangerous free radicals and lower the risk of a number of diseases brought on by oxidative stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref21">21</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> displays the findings on the impact of various treatments on the DPPH free radical scavenging activity of ripe and overripe pineapple juices. All sonicated juice samples exhibit a substantial (p &lt; 0.05) increase in DPPH free radical scavenging activity,</p><p>which is similar to the findings for sonicated kasturi lime juice, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref7">7</xref>] . Bavisetty and Venkatachalam, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref20">20</xref>] reported the same pattern of decreased antioxidant activity from wax apple juice by sonication and subsequent pasteurization. This increase may be attributable to the higher quantity of phenolic chemicals created by cavitation during sonication. There was a high correlation between antioxidant concentration and phytochemical content, particularly ascorbic acid and phenolic acid. According to Gil et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref38">38</xref>] and Crozier et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref39">39</xref>] , the antioxidant potential of fruits is due to ascorbic acid, phenols, and flavonoids. In many plant species, previous studies have shown a link between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124282-ref41">41</xref>] .</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The physicochemical qualities of pineapple juices extracted at various maturities were enhanced by sonication alone or in conjunction with pasteurization. The benefits of sonication become more apparent with continued processing. In contrast, pasteurization significantly lowered the antioxidant activity of juices. Moreover, sonication is less expensive than industrial thermal processing, which is both time-consuming and energy-intensive. As a fruit juice processing procedure, sonication (alone or in combination with pasteurization) offers advantages over pasteurization.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Alam, A., Biswas, M., Ahmed, T., Zahid, M.A., Alam, M., Hasan, M.K., Biswas, B. and Zaman, R. (2023) Effect of Ultrasound and Thermal Pasteurization on Physicochemical Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Juice Extracted from Ripe and Overripe Pineapple. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 14, 300-314. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2023.144020</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124282-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Difonzo, G., Vollmer, K., Caponio, F., Pasqualone, A., Carle, R. and Steingass, C.B. (2019) Characterisation and Classification of Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) Juice from Pulp and Peel. Food Control, 96, 260-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Wali, N. (2019) Pineapple (Ananas comosus). In: Nabavi, S.M. and Silva, A.S., Eds., Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812491-8.00050-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, S.M.Y., Ahiduzzaman, M., Akhter, S., Biswas, M.A.M., Iqbal, N., Onik, J.C. and Rahman, M.H. (2015) Comparative Effects on Storage Period of Varieties Pineapple Fruits. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, 2, 395-410. https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v2i3.26162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chakraborty, S., Rao, P.S. and Mishra, H.N. (2014) Effect of pH on Enzyme Inactivation Kinetics in High-Pressure Processed Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) Puree Using Response Surface Methodology. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7, 3629-3645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-014-1380-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shomer, R., Cogan, U. and Mannheim, C.H. (1994) Thermal Death Parameters of Orange Juice and Effect of Minimal Heat Treatment and Carbon Dioxide on Shelf-Life. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 18, 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.1994.tb00254.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rattanathanalerk, M., Chiewchan, N. and Srichumpoung, W. (2005) Effect of Thermal Processing on the Quality Loss of Pineapple Juice. Journal of Food Engineering, 66, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.03.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhat, R., Kamaruddin, N.S.B.C., Min-Tze, L. and Karim, A.A. (2011) Sonication Improves Kasturi Lime (Citrus microcarpa) Juice Quality. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 18, 1295-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.04.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiwari, B.K., Muthukumarappan, K., O’Donnell, C.P. and Cullen, P.J. (2009) Inactivation Kinetics of Pectin Methylesterase and Cloud Retention in Sonicated Orange Juice. Innovative Food Science &amp; Emerging Technologies, 10, 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2008.11.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valero, M., Recrosio, N., Saura, D., Mu&amp;#241;oz, N., Martí, N. and Lizama, V. (2007) Effects of Ultrasonic Treatments in Orange Juice Processing. Journal of Food Engineering, 80, 509-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.06.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonteles, T.V., Costa, M.G.M., de Jesus, A.L.T., de Miranda, M.R.A., Fernandes, F.A.N. and Rodrigues, S. (2012) Power Ultrasound Processing of Cantaloupe Melon Juice: Effects on Quality Parameters. Food Research International, 48, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.02.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abid, M., Jabbar, S., Hu, B., Hashim, M.M., Wu, T., Wu, Z., Khan, M.A. and Zeng, X. (2014) Synergistic Impact of Sonication and High Hydrostatic Pressure on Microbial and Enzymatic Inactivation of Apple Juice. LWT—Food Science and Technology, 59, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.04.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiwari, B.K., Muthukumarappan, K., O’Donnell, C.P. and Cullen, P.J. (2008) Colour Degradation and Quality Parameters of Sonicated Orange Juice Using Response Surface Methodology. LWT—Food Science and Technology, 41, 1876-1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jabbar, S., Abid, M., Wu, T., Muhammad Hashim, M., Hu, B., Lei, S., Zhu, X. and Zeng, X. (2014) Study on Combined Effects of Blanching and Sonication on Different Quality Parameters of Carrot Juice. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 65, 28-33. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2013.836735</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Terefe, N.S., Gamage, M., Vilkhu, K., Simons, L., Mawson, R. and Versteeg, C. (2009) The Kinetics of Inactivation of Pectin Methylesterase and Polygalacturonase in Tomato Juice by Thermosonication. Food Chemistry, 117, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nayak, P.K., Chandrasekar, C.M. and Kesavan, R.K. (2018) Effect of Thermosonication on the Quality Attributes of Star Fruit Juice. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 41, e12857. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12857</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saeeduddin, M., Abid, M., Jabbar, S., Wu, T., Hashim, M.M., Awad, F.N., Hu, B., Lei, S. and Zeng, X. (2015) Quality Assessment of Pear Juice under Ultrasound and Commercial Pasteurization Processing Conditions. LWT—Food Science and Technology, 64, 452-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ertugay, M.F. and Baslar, M. (2014) The Effect of Ultrasonic Treatments on Cloudy Quality-Related Quality Parameters in Apple Juice. Innovative Food Science &amp; Emerging Technologies, 26, 226-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2014.06.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shamsudin, R., Daud, W.R.W., Takriff, M.S. and Hassan, O. (2011) Chemical Compositions and Thermal Properties of the Josapine Variety of Pineapple Fruit (Ananas comosus L.) in Different Storage Systems. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 34, 1558-1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2009.00510.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramallo, L.A. and Mascheroni, R.H. (2012) Quality Evaluation of Pineapple Fruit during Drying Process. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 90, 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2011.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bavisetty, S.C.B. and Venkatachalam, K. (2021) Physicochemical Qualities and Antioxidant Properties of Juice Extracted from Ripe and Overripe Wax Apple as Affected by Pasteurization and Sonication. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 45, e15524. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aadil, R.M., Zeng, X.-A., Han, Z. and Sun, D.-W. (2013) Effects of Ultrasound Treatments on Quality of Grapefruit Juice. Food Chemistry, 141, 3201-3206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Redd, J.B., Hendrix, C.M. and Hendrix, D.L. (1986) Quality Control Manual for Citrus Processing Plants. Intercity Inc., Safety Harbor, FL, 1-250.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (1995) Ascorbic Acid in Vitamin Preparations and Juices: 2,6-Dichloroindophenol Titrimetric Method. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC, 16-17. https://vdocuments.site/aoac-method-ascorbic-ac-967-21.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alothman, M., Bhat, R. and Karim, A.A. (2009) Antioxidant Capacity and Phenolic Content of Selected Tropical Fruits from Malaysia, Extracted with Different Solvents. Food Chemistry, 115, 785-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sadiq, M.B., Hanpithakpong, W., Tarning, J. and Anal, A.K. (2015) Screening of Phytochemicals and in Vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves, Pods and Bark Extracts of Acacia nilotica (L.) Del. Industrial Crops and Products, 77, 873-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Supeno and Kruus, P. (2000) Sonochemical Formation of Nitrate and Nitrite in Water. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 7, 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(99)00043-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiwari, B.K., Patras, A., Brunton, N., Cullen, P.J. and O’Donnell, C.P. (2010) Effect of Ultrasound Processing on Anthocyanins and Color of Red Grape Juice. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 17, 598-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.10.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venkatachalam, K., Techakanon, C. and Thitithanakul, S. (2018) Impact of the Ripening Stage of Wax Apples on Chemical Profiles of Juice and Cider. ACS Omega, 3, 6710-6718. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raju, S. and Deka, S.C. (2018) Influence of Thermosonication Treatments on Bioactive Compounds and Sensory Quality of Fruit (Haematocarpus validus) Juice. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 42, e13701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13701</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zinoviadou, K.G., Galanakis, C.M., Brncic, M., Grimi, N., Boussetta, N., Mota, M.J., Saraiva, J.A., Patras, A., Tiwari, B. and Barba, F.J. (2015) Fruit Juice Sonication: Implications on Food Safety and Physicochemical and Nutritional Properties. Food Research International, 77, 743-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Brasil, I.M. and Siddiqui, M.W. (2018) Postharvest Quality of Fruits and Vegetables: An Overview. In: Siddiqui, M.W., Ed., Preharvest Modulation of Postharvest Fruit and Vegetable Quality, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809807-3.00001-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">do Amaral Souza, F.C., Gomes Sanders Moura, L., de Oliveira Bezerra, K., Paiva Lopes Aguiar, J., Moreira Mar, J., Sanches, E.A., dos Santos, F.F., Bakry, A.M., Nicolau Paulino, B. and Campelo, P.H. (2019) Thermosonication Applied on Camucamu Nectars Processing: Effect on Bioactive Compounds and Quality Parameters. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 116, 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2019.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, L., Soh, C., Liew, S. and Teh, F. (2007) Effects of Sonication and Carbonation on Guava Juice Quality. Food Chemistry, 104, 1396-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marín, F.R., Martinez, M., Uribesalgo, T., Castillo, S. and Frutos, M.J. (2002) Changes in Nutraceutical Composition of Lemon Juices According to Different Industrial Extraction Systems. Food Chemistry, 78, 319-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00102-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zou, Y. and Jiang, A. (2016) Effect of Ultrasound Treatment on Quality and Microbial Load of Carrot Juice. Food Science and Technology, 36, 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.0061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashokkumar, M., Sunartio, D., Kentish, S., Mawson, R., Simons, L., Vilkhu, K. and Versteeg, C. (Kees) (2008) Modification of Food Ingredients by Ultrasound to Improve Functionality: A Preliminary Study on a Model System. Innovative Food Science &amp; Emerging Technologies, 9, 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2007.05.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zafra-Rojas, Q.Y., Cruz-Cansino, N., Ramírez-Moreno, E., Delgado-Olivares, L., Villanueva-Sánchez, J. and Alanís-García, E. (2013) Effects of Ultrasound Treatment in Purple Cactus Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Juice. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 20, 1283-1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.01.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gil, M.I., Tomás-Barberán, F.A., Hess-Pierce, B. and Kader, A.A. (2002) Antioxidant Capacities, Phenolic Compounds, Carotenoids, and Vitamin C Contents of Nectarine, Peach, and Plum Cultivars from California. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 4976-4982. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020136b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crozier, A., Jaganath, I.B. and Clifford, M.N. (2009) Dietary Phenolics: Chemistry, Bioavailability and Effects on Health. Natural Product Reports, 26, 1001-1043. https://doi.org/10.1039/b802662a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duh, P.-D., Tu, Y.-Y. and Yen, G.-C. (1999) Antioxidant Activity of Water Extract of Harng Jyur (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat). LWT—Food Science and Technology, 32, 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.1999.0548</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124282-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gülcin, I., Küfrevioglu, O.I., Oktay, M. and Büyükokuroglu, M.E. (2004) Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antiulcer and Analgesic Activities of Nettle (Urtica dioica L.). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 90, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2003.09.028</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>