<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2023.114007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-124253</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of &lt;i&gt;Ficus benghalensis&lt;/i&gt; Latex Based Combinatorial Formulations on Various Bio-Molecules in Indian White Termite &lt;i&gt;Odontotermes obesus&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abhishek</surname><given-names>Kumar Tripathi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ravi</surname><given-names>Kant Upadhyay</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Zoology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>102</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In present investigation, various bioassays were conducted to evaluate the alteration in levels of certain biomolecules, such as glycogen, protein, amino acid, DNA, RNA and lipids. For this purpose, worker termites were treated with sub-lethal dose 40% and 80% of 24 hrs LD
  <sub>50</sub> values and observations were taken at 4 hrs interval up to 24 hrs. Crude latex and its combinatorial mixtures, like S-MLT-A, B-MLT-A, C-MLT-A, CU-MLT-A, AQ-MLT significantly altered level of bio-molecules in
  <em> Odontotermes obesus</em>. This effect was found time and dose dependent. Reduction or increase in biomolecules was calculated by using corresponding control. Maximum decrease in glycogen level was observed at 16 h when termites were treated with 80% of LD
  <sub>50</sub> of 
  <em>Ficus benghalensis</em> aqueous extract 
  <em>i.e.</em> 56.88% at 16 h of treatment. A similar dose caused very slight decrease in lipid contents at 4 h of treatment but it was found further significantly (p &gt; 0.05) decreased in other successive treatments. 40% and 80% of LD
  <sub>50</sub> of C-MLT-B mixture caused significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease in DNA and RNA level at 16 h treatment. The level of DNA and RNA level was recorded 83.90%, 90.18% and 85.42% and 74.05% respectively. Similarly, total proteins were also found to be decreased with 40% and 80% of LD
  <sub>50</sub> of C-MLT-B mixture 
  <em>i.e. </em>71.47% and 66.45% respectively. All these alterations found in levels of various bio-molecules confirm the action of latex ingredients on worker termites that was antifeedant or deterrent types. These ingredients can be used to control not only termites but also other phytophagous insects in a sustainable and eco-friendly way.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Ficus benghalensis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Odontotermes obesus&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Latexes</kwd><kwd> Antifeedant or Deterrent Termiticides</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Termites are highly destructive polyphagous pests that cause severe damage to crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref1">1</xref>] . Termites can seriously infect garden trees, timber, building materials, supplies, paper and clothing, causing enormous economic losses. Termites infest at various stages of plant growth. These attack crop plants such as sugarcane, maize, wheat, barley, rice and vegetable crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref3">3</xref>] . These cause approximately 50% - 100% yield losses in these crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref5">5</xref>] . They also act as decomposers, improving soil fertility, yields, and are also used by people around the world to their benefit. It poses a threat to farming communities as it indirectly causes large losses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref6">6</xref>] . Termites are major soil macrofauna and control of termites population is very essential to avoid crop damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Termites build huge mounds to protect from colonization and environmental stress, and to hide from predators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref8">8</xref>] . They are mainly involved in many ecological processes, such as breaking down plant debris and dead wood and converting them into soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref9">9</xref>] . The impact of termites on the global economy is estimated at about $40 billion annually, with subterranean termites accounting for about 80% of the total impact [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref10">10</xref>] . Forest termite populations are under attack by predatory ants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>However, for controlling termite attack, harmful synthetic chemical pesticides are extensively applied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref12">12</xref>] . Various synthetic pesticides such as cyclodiene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref14">14</xref>] , cypermethrin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref15">15</xref>] , hydroquinone and indoxcarb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref16">16</xref>] have been used to control termites in crops. Dursban spray has been shown to be highly effective in controlling wood-destroying termites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref17">17</xref>] . Thiamethoxam shows high mortality in Asian subterranean termite Coptotermes gestroi workers after 1 - 3 days exposure time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref18">18</xref>] . These chemicals have severe adverse effects on untargeted biotic and abiotic environmental factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref19">19</xref>] . Though chemical insecticides are highly effective against termite, they are hazardous to non-target organisms in the ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref20">20</xref>] . Its bound residues persist for longer duration in the environment, and through various trophic levels they entered into the food chain.</p><p>For control of termites, many toxic synthetic chemical insecticides, bio-insecticides and botanicals were used but work on plant latex is very scare [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref22">22</xref>] . Plant latexes and some botanicals from Plant species Calotropis procera, Ipomoea fistulosa, Maesa lanceolata, Croton macrostachyus, Targets minuta, Datura stramonium and Azadirachta indica are used for the management of termites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref25">25</xref>] . Latex is produced and stored in specialized cells named “laticifers”. Laticifers form a tubing system composed of rows of elongated cells that branch and create an internal network encompassing the entire plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref26">26</xref>] . Plants exude latex sap in response to physical damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref27">27</xref>] . Fig latex is more effective natural therapeutic antibacterial agents against the pathogenic bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref28">28</xref>] . Antiviral properties of C. majus latex arise both from alkaloids and proteins contained therein, acting on different stages of the viral replication cycle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref29">29</xref>] . There are so many plant-based botanicals that could act against termites in crop fields and vegetations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Combinatorial Formulations</title><p>Ficus benghalensis and other ingredients were used in preparation of combinatorial mixtures. The details of combinatorial mixtures are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Ficus benghalensis and other ingredients used in preparation of combinatorial mixtures</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S. No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Combinatorial Mixtures</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredients</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (9 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Sulphur (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (12 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Sulphur (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (18 gm) + Coconut oil (50 ml) + Terpene oil (50 ml) + Glycerol (50 ml) + Sulphur (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (9 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Borate (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (12 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Borate (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (18 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Borate (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (9 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Copper (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes peels (12 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Copper (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (18 gm) + Coconut oil (17 ml) + Terpene oil (17 ml) + Glycerol (17 ml) + Copper (3 gm) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CU-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (9 gm) + Photoactivated Cow urine (10 g/L) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CU-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (12 gm) + Photoactivated Cow urine (10 g/L) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CU-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (18 gm) + Photoactivated Cow urine (10 g/L) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AQ-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (40 gm) + Water (200 ml)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (40 gm) + Acetone (200 ml)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (40 gm) + Hexane (200 ml)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (40 gm) + Petroleum Ether (200 ml)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EA-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ficus benghalensis latexes (40 gm) + Ethyl Alcohol (200 ml)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malathion*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malathion powder (7.5 gm/liter) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fipronil*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fipronil powder (7.5 gm/liter) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thiamethoxam*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thiamethoxam powder (7.5 gm/liter) + Water (5 liter)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Synthetic pesticides.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Different latex based combinatorial mixture data analysis of LD50 values</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name of Latex/ Combinatorial Mixture</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LD50 &#181;g/gm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.95 confidence limit UCL-LCL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Slope function</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Degree of freedom</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LD40 &#181;g/gm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LD 20 &#181;g/gm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Heterogeneity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >368.529</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >550.006 - 276.516</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0815</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.118078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0204</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >521.701</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000.726 - 342.461</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.134144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6191</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >716.570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >914.105 - 587.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.132971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >286.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.999</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >757.042 - 191.141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.497</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.108045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6244</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >421.634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >582.976 - 312.699</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6838</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.131763</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4210</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >670.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >992.442 - 495.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.139478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >268.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3901</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >295.197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >494.773 - 195.430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.109047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8060</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >548.854</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1049.929 - 368.438</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9930</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.126025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9983</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >717.439</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >927.577 - 538.238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.129877</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >286.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.808</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CU-MLT-A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323.776</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >479.273 - 238.499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.110143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0318</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CU-MLT-B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >555.295</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1402.248 - 343.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.558</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.124327</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6396</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CU-MLT-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >717.609</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1353.574 - 481.076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.133737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AQ-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.719</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.771 - 19.287</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.643967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.405 - 15.488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.693</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.542454</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.423</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.887</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.163 - 6.857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.417258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7953</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.564 - 19.464</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.535656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.448</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EA-MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.902</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.602 - 10.885</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.592</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.430078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.898</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malathion*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.511 - 52.909</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.875498</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.521</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fipronil*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.891</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.871 - 18.100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.839</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.715511</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9597</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thiamethoxam*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.329 - 41.833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.872107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.711</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Synthetic pesticides.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Determination of Bio-Molecular Parameters</title><p>Termite workers were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis latex based combinatorial mixtures separately. Whole body extracts was prepared by homogenization of termites in PBS buffer and centrifuged. Changes in the levels of different biomolecules were measured after different time intervals mainly at 4, 8, 12 and 16 hours. Several important biomolecules such as glycogen, total free amino acids, total lipids, nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) and total protein were determined in whole body extract of termites.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Determination of Glycogen</title><p>Glycogen content was determined by the Dubois’s method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref31">31</xref>] . For this purpose, 500 mg of termites were homogenized in 2 ml of 5% TCA using a glass homogenizer and centrifuged. After centrifugation, the supernatant was transferred to a 100 ml graduated cylinder and 3 volumes of 95% ethyl alcohol was added. The mixture was stirred until the precipitate started to flocculate, then a small amount of NaCl was added to enhance flocculation. The graduated cylinder was then heated by placing it in hot boiling water until a precipitate formed. After centrifuging the contents again, the precipitate was dissolved in 5 ml of distilled water. To 0.5 ml of the unknown deproteinized glycogen supernatant was then added 6 ml of concentrated H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and the contents were kept in boiling water for 5 minutes, then the mixture was cooled to room temperature. The optical density of the content was observed at 530 nm. Glycogen levels in unknowns (supernatants) were calculated using a standard curve plotted with known amounts of glucose. A blank was prepared using 0.50 ml of 5% TCA and 6 ml of concentrated H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The amount of glycogen is expressed in gm/100gm of termite body weight. Three replicates were set up to maintain accuracy and precision. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA method.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Determination of Total Free Amino Acid</title><p>Free amino acid content was determined by using Spies’s method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref32">32</xref>] . For this purpose, 500 mg of treated termites were homogenized in 2 ml of 95% ethyl alcohol. The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000&#215; g for 20 minutes and the supernatant separated. For estimation, 0.1 ml of supernatant was taken and mixed with 0.1 ml of distilled water and 2.0 ml of ninhydrin reagent. Ninhydrin reagent was prepared by mixing 1.0 g of ninhydrin in 25 ml of absolute ethanol and 0.04 g of stannous chloride in 25 ml of citrate buffer (pH 5.0). The citrate buffer was prepared by mixing 20 ml of reagent A (1.05 g citric acid in 50 ml distilled water) and 29.5 ml reagent B (2.94 g sodium citrate in 100 ml distilled water). The reaction mixture was kept in boiling water for 15 minutes. Now 2 ml of 5.0% ethyl alcohol was added to the above boiled mixture. A purple color developed in the reaction mixture measured at 575 nm. For calculations, a standard curve was constructed using known amounts of glycine and expressed in gm/100gm termite body weight. Three replicates are used and the data are analyzed statistically by the ANOVA method.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Determination of Total Lipid</title><p>Total lipid content in termite whole body extracts was determined by the Folch’s method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref33">33</xref>] . For this purpose, 500 mg of termite workers were homogenized in 5 ml of a mixture of chloroform and methanol (2:1 v/v). The homogenized material was suspended and held at room temperature for 30 minutes. After that, it was filtered through Whatmann paper no. 1. The residue was resuspended in the same volume of mixture for 1 hour and the supernatant filtered again. Both filtrates were mixed with an equal volume of 0.6% NaCl (w/v). The separatory funnel containing the above mixture was kept in the dark at room temperature for 12 hours. The upper solvent layer (chloroform:methanol) was collected and the unsaponified portion was kept unused. The contents of the lower layer were allowed to evaporate by placing in an oven at 60˚C. Finally, total lipid levels were weighed and expressed as gm/100gm of termite body weight. Three replicates were set and data were statistically analyzed by his ANOVA method.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Determination of Nucleic Acids</title><p>The content of nucleic acids in termite whole body extracts was determined by the Schneider’s method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref34">34</xref>] . For this purpose, 500 mg of termite workers he separately fed with 40% and 80% LD50 of aqueous extracts and their combinatorial mixtures. Termites were sacrificed and homogenized in 5% TCA with glass homogenizer and centrifuged at 15,000&#215; g for 25 minutes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. DNA Estimation</title><p>For DNA determination, 0.2 ml of supernatant was taken and diluted by adding 3.8 ml of distilled water. Then 4.0 ml of diphenylamine reagent (1 g diphenylamine, 100 g glacial acetic acid, 2.5 ml concentrated H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) was added. The contents were kept in the boiling water bath for 10 minutes. Blue color developed in solution measured at 600 nm.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. RNA Estimation</title><p>For RNA measurement, 0.2 ml of supernatant was taken and diluted by adding 4.8 ml of distilled water. Then 2 ml of orcinol reagent (1 g orcinol, 100 ml concentrated HCl and 0.5 g ferric acid) was added. A green color developed when the solution was kept in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes, measured at 600 nm. In both cases, three replicates were set up and the resulting data were statically analyzed by her ANOVA method.</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Determination of Total Protein</title><p>Termite total protein was estimated by using the Lowry’s method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref35">35</xref>] . For this purpose, 500 mg of termite workers were treated separately with mixtures of aqueous extracts of Ficus benghalensis latex based combinatorial mixtures. These treated termites were homogenized in 4.0 ml of 10% TCA using a glass homogenizer. The resulting homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000&#215; g for 15 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, the precipitate was dissolved in 5% TCA, centrifuged again at the same speed for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was then dissolved in 1 ml of 1N NaOH and centrifuged again at the same speed. The supernatant was used for protein determination. For this purpose, 0.5 ml of alkaline copper solution (reagent C) was added to 0.5 ml of supernatant. Reagent C was prepared by addition of 50.0 ml reagent A (2% sodium carbonate in 0.1N NaOH) and 1 ml of reagent B (1.0% sodium potassium tartarate, 0.5% copper sulphate mixed in 1:1 ratio at the time of experiment). The reaction mixture was kept for 10 minutes at room temperature and then 0.5 ml Folin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent (diluted 1:2 ratio with distilled water at the time of experiment) was added. Then 1.5 ml of 0.2N NaOH and 3.5 ml of distilled water were added and mixed thoroughly. After 10 minutes, the reaction developed a blue color measured at 620 nm. Three replicates were set up for each experiment. A standard curve was generated using various concentrations of bovine serum albumin. The data obtained were statistically analyzed by using the ANOVA method.</p></sec><sec id="s2_10"><title>2.10. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The LD<sub>50</sub> in termite workers were determined for each extract and combinatorial mixture by using Probit analysis. Mean, standard deviation, standard error, correlation and Student t-test were applied by the ANOVA program. A chi-square test was used to assess repellency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref36">36</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The investigation of biochemical estimation of various biomolecules glycogen, amino acid, lipid, DNA, RNA and protein were done in treated and control termites. For this purpose adult worker termites were provided with 40% and 80% LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis latex and its other combinatorial mixtures with the diet. After 4 h of treatment each biomolecule level was determined up to 16 h. Whole body extract of both treated and control termites were prepared. For this purpose termites were scarified, homogenized and centrifuged and level of various biomolecules was determined. Reduction or increase in biomolecules was calculated by using corresponding control (Figures 1-20).</p><p>40% of Ficus benghalensis aqueous extract caused significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease in glycogen level in treated termites in comparison to control at 16 h of treatment. Maximum decrease in glycogen level was observed at 16 h when termites were treated with 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis aqueous extract i.e. 56.88% at 16 h of treatment. A similar dose caused very slight decrease in lipid contents at 4 h of treatment but it was found further significantly (p &gt; 0.05) decreased in other successive treatments. Similarly 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis aqueous extract caused significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease in DNA level at 16 h of treatment i.e. 77.32% in comparison to control. Besides this, both RNA and protein levels were found to be decreased when termites were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis aqueous extract i.e. 82.38% and 68.47% &amp; 55.06% and 61.28% at 16 h treatment in comparison to control respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">Figure 13</xref>).</p><p>Treatment of 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of C-MLT-B mixture caused a significant decrease in glycogen levels up to 63.44% and 64.14% at 16 h treatment in comparison to control respectively. In another experiment when termites were treated with 40% of LD<sub>50</sub> of C-ST3 mixture show decrease in amino acid level at 4 h of treatment i.e. 61.93% but later it increased up to 78.58% at 16 h of treatment respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). In the same experiment 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of C-MLT-B mixture caused significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease in DNA and RNA level at 16 h treatment. The level of DNA and RNA level was recorded 83.90%, 90.18% and 85.42% and 74.05% respectively. Similarly total proteins were also found to be decreased with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of C-MLT-B mixture i.e. 71.47% and 66.45% respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p><p>In another experiment when termites were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of B-MLT-C mixture, it has shown continuous decrease in glycogen level i.e. 56.05% and 55.44% at 16 h of treatment in comparison to control respectively. While at the same dose amino acid level was found to be decreased at 4 h treatment i.e. 86.08% and 73.80% but later on start increasing simultaneously. Similarly the lipid level was also found to be decreased at 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of B-MLT-C mixture up to both at 4 h and 8 h i.e. 75.29%, 75.69% and 78.39% and 72.67% respectively in comparison to control. At a similar dose DNA level was also found to be decreased at 16 h treatment i.e. 91.06% and 86.95% respectively. Similarly RNA level was also found to be decreased up to 54.21% and 61.60% at 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of B-MLT-C mixture respectively. Maximum inhibition was observed in protein level i.e. 69.06% and 61.75% at 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of 16 h of treatment respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>For the determination of toxicity of Ficus benghalensis latex and its combinatorial mixture its effect was determined in biomolecules. For this purpose termites were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis aqueous extract and its combinatorial mixtures. Effects were observed on glycogen, amino acid, DNA, RNA and protein levels at regular time intervals (Figures 1-20). A significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease was observed in all the above biomolecules when termites were treated with S-MLT-A combinatorial mixture. A similar decrease was obtained in glycogen, amino acid, DNA, RNA and protein levels when termites were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of B-MLT-A mixture, while lipid contents were found to be decreased two fold (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Similarly 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of S-MLT-C mixture also caused significant (p &lt; 0.05) decline in glycogen, amino acid, DNA, RNA and protein contents after 16 h of treatment. Lipid content was found to be decreased up to 75.05% and 73.78% at 16 h treatment respectively. Plant natural product based combinatorial formulations have shown very high lethality in Odontotermes obesus. This is proved by very low LD 50 values obtained in each case. These types of formulations showed strong anti-termite potential as natural pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref38">38</xref>] . These gave an overall sustainable way to termite control in crop field mainly maize and millet crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>In another experiment termite were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis mixed with borate and other natural components, it caused a significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease in glycogen, amino acid, DNA, RNA, protein and lipid level in termites (Figures 4-6). Similar Ficus benghalensis mixed with copper sulphate mixture has shown significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease in the level of all macromolecules in comparison to untreated termites (Figures 7-9). Besides this, photo-activated cow urine and its combinatorial mixtures with Ficus benghalensis i.e. CU-MLT-A, B and C have also shown significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease in levels of different macromolecules (Figures 13-15). It was mostly found that on an average Ficus benghalensis and its combinatorial mixtures have shown better toxicity than synthetic pesticides (Figures 1-20). It is well known that stored lipids are the most important and convenient stores of metabolic energy, meeting the long-term energy needs of insects under stress. Physiologically, lipids play an important role in insect development, reproduction, and flight. Inhibition of lipid metabolism interferes with most of the normal physiological activities of termites, resulting in indirect control of termites. In insects, carbohydrate metabolism also plays an important role in flight mechanisms and reproduction. In insects trehlose a disaccharide is an important energy molecule that upon hydrolysis give rise three molecules of glucose in the presence of enzyme trehlase, which synthesizes in midgut epithelium of insects. Besides trehlose, glycogen is a major energy reserve found in fat body and muscles. Glycogen is synthesized from glucose units but indirectly it is also synthesized from glucogenic amino acids which indicate utilization of amino acids. Therefore, more phosphorylation indicates major utilization of food reserves and release of high energy in insect tissues. Another reason of decrease in levels of glycogen and protein is toxic stress imposed by extract. In this study glycogen amount was reduced after treatment of Ficus benghalensis aqueous fraction and its combinatorial mixtures in termites. Similarly amount of total lipids was also increased. It may be due to breakdown of glycerides and diglycerides. As insects obtained lipids are essential dietary constituents. If any how lipid metabolism is induced then it indirectly cut down carbohydrate reserves. Usually in insects, fatty acids are accumulated in fat body as triglycerides, which serve as energy reserves. Hence, lipid reserves are built up during active feeding. On the other hand mobilization of more lipids may induce hydrolysis of triglycerides, diglycerides by an enzyme lipase. If lipid reserve increases it means hydrolytic enzymes are not working and over deposition of lipid may cause oxidative stress in insects. Similarly increased protein level is also related to an increase in RNA concentration while at the same time DNA amount may be lesser. Subsequently the ratio of RNA and DNA has wide concern with protein metabolism. At time of active protein synthesis DNA ratio falls but later on increases. Reduction in protein synthesis may lead to decrease in protein concentration and RNA, at the same time DNA level may increase. More specifically, all macromolecules serve as initial substrate for oxidation and energy production. Plant latex and other exudates are sap that exude from plant injury sites caused by mechanical or insect injury. Latex is secreted from 10% of plant families, has evolved independently many times, and is the most effective defense of milkweeds against its chewing herbivores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref42">42</xref>] . Latex contains two specialized metabolites such as terpenoids, cardenolides, alkaloids, and phenolics, which are show broad spectrum such as antibacterial, antifungal, anthelmintic, cytotoxic, and insect-repellent activities. Latex is a type of sticky endogenous fluids derived from diverse plants. It contains unique compounds mainly defense molecules which protect plants against microbes and herbivores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref44">44</xref>] . Latex secreted from E. fischeriana show anti-feedant activity against H. armigera [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref45">45</xref>] while Plumeria rubra plant latex shows activity against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref46">46</xref>] . Latex of Synadenium grantii shows activity nematicidal activity on Meloidogyne incognita and Panagrellus redivivus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref47">47</xref>] .</p><p>Plant latex contains defense metabolites which assist them to protect against insect herbivores and pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref48">48</xref>] . Latex was used traditinonal folk medicine to treat papillae, warts, condylomas, human papilloma virus (HPV) infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref50">50</xref>] . Latex of P. pudica show inflammatory ulcerative colitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref51">51</xref>] . The synthesized AgNps synthesized from P. rubra latex were formed highly toxic than crude latex extract termite species. Latex of Thevetia peruviana show antifungal activity against P. amapa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref52">52</xref>] , latex shows activity against change C. megacephala post embryonic development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref53">53</xref>] . Plant exudates mainly latex, sap, gums, resins etc. are known to possess diverse biological activities including, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and wound healing and anti-termite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref54">54</xref>] . Calotropis procera is known to produce contact dermatitis and the latex of this plant produces intense inflammation. It also found quite effective against termites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124253-ref55">55</xref>] .</p><p>To prove antitermitic activity of Ficus benghalensis latex and its various combinatorial mixtures, level of various biomolecules were determined in termites. Ficus benghalensis aqueous extract and its combinatorial mixtures have shown significant alterations in biomolecules level. This led to the formation of abnormal state in the insects and make insects unable to survive.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Summary</title><p>In present investigation, Ficus benghalensis latex and its combinatorial mixture, and its effect were determined in biomolecules. For this purpose, termites were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of Ficus benghalensis aqueous extract and its combinatorial mixtures. Effects were observed on glycogen, amino acid, DNA, RNA and protein levels at regular time interval. A significant (p &gt; 0.05) decrease was observed in all the above biomolecules when termites were treated with S-MLT-A combinatorial mixture. A similar decrease was obtained in glycogen, amino acid, DNA, RNA and protein levels when termites were treated with 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of B-MLT-A mixture, while lipid contents were found to be decreased two fold. Similarly 40% and 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of S-MLT-C mixture also caused significant (p &lt; 0.05) decline in glycogen, amino acid, DNA, RNA and protein contents after 16 h of treatment. Lipid content was found to be decreased up to 75.05% and 73.78% at 16 h treatment respectively. Plant natural product based combinatorial formulations have shown very high lethality in Odontotermes obesus. This is proved by very low LD 50 values obtained in each case. Toxicity in aqueous extract was much higher than solvent extracts. This is the main merit in these formulations as they have strong anti-termite potential as natural pesticides. Plant latex protects plants from insect predation and damage. It contains strong antifeedants and toxic components. These gave an overall sustainable way to termite control in crop field, mainly maize and millet crops. This led to the formation of abnormal state in the insects and made insects unable to survive.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are thankful to HOD Zoology for facilities.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tripathi, A.K. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2023) Effect of Ficus benghalensis Latex Based Combinatorial Formulations on Various Bio-Molecules in Indian White Termite Odontotermes obesus. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 11, 82-102. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2023.114007</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124253-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kanyi, N.C., Karuri, H., Nyasani, J.O. and Mwangi, B. (2021) Land Use Effects on Termite Assemblages in Kenya. Heliyon, 7, e08588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08588</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salihah, Z., Satar, A. and Khatoon, R. (1986) Termite Damage to Sugarcane Crop at Mardan Area. Ann. Tech. Rep. NIFA, Tarnab, Peshawar, 126-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sattar, A. and Salihah, Z. (2001) Detection and Control of Subterranean Termites. Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture. Proceedings Workshop (Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture), Faisalabad, 24-26 September 2001, 195-198.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, M.R., Singh, M.P. and Day (2000) Insect Pest Problem in Tropical Agroforestry Systems, Contributory Factors and Strategies. R.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sekamatte, M.B., Kyamanywa, S., Wilson, H.R. and Simth, A.R. (2002) Effect of Placement Method and Rate of Application of Crushed Fish Bones on the Activity of Predatory Ants and Impact on Termite Damage to Maize. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 22, 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400012054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, F., Fouad, H., Liang, S.Y., Hu, Y. and Mo, J.C. (2021) Termites and Chinese Agricultural System: Applications and Advances in Integrated Termite Management and Chemical Control. Insect Science, 28, 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12726</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anyango, J.J., Bautze, D., Fiaboe, K.K.M., Lagat, Z.O., Muriuki, A.W., Stockli, S., Riedel, J., Onyambu, G.K., Musyoka, M.W., Karanja, E.N. and Adamtey, N. (2020) The Impact of Conventional and Organic Farming on Soil Biodiversity Conservation: A Case Study on Termites in the Long-Term Farming Systems Comparison Trials in Kenya. BMC Ecology, 20, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00282-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Huis, A. (2017) Cultural Significance of Termites in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 13, Article No. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0137-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calderon-Cortes, N., Escalera-Vázquez, L.H. and Oyama, K. (2018) Occurrence of Termites (Isoptera) on Living and Standing Dead Trees in a Tropical Dry Forest in Mexico. PeerJ, 6, e4731. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4731</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oi, F. (2022) A Review of the Evolution of Termite Control: A Continuum of Alternatives to Termiticides in the United States with Emphasis on Efficacy Testing Requirements for Product Registration. Insects, 13, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tuma, J., Eggleton, P. and Fayle, T.M. (2020) Ant-Termite Interactions: An Important but Under-Explored Ecological Linkage. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 95, 555-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12577</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venkateswara, R.J., Parvathi, K., Kavitha, P., Jakka, N.M. and Pallela, R. (2005) Effect of Chlorpyrifos and Monocrotophos on Locomotor Behaviour and Acetylcholinesterase Activity of Subterranean Termites, Odontotermes obesus. Pest Management Science, 61,417-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.986</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sim, M., Forbes, A., McNeil, J. and Robert, G. (1998) Termite Control and Other Determinants of High Body Burdens of Cyclodiene Insecticides. Archives of Environmental Health, 53, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1998.10545972</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sisay, A., Ibrahim, A. and Tefera, T. (2008) Management of Termite (Microtermes adschaggae) on Hot Pepper Using Powdered Leaves and Seeds of Some Plant Species at Bako, Western Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences, 2, 41-44. https://doi.org/10.4314/eajsci.v2i1.40363</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valles, S.M. and Woodson, W.D. (2002) Group Effects on Insecticide Toxicity in Workers of the Formosan Subterranean Termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. Pest Management Science, 58, 769-774. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.528</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, X.P. (2005) Valuation of Efficacy and Nonrepellency of Indoxacarb and Fipronil-Treated Soil at Various Concentrations and Thicknesses against Two Subterranean Termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 98, 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/98.2.509</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Roll, D. (2007) Management of Wood-Destroying Pests. In: Randall, C.J., Ed., A Guide for Commercial Applicators Category 7B, Michigan State University, Ohio, 8-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Acda, M.N. (2014) Toxicity and Transmission of Thiamethoxam in the Asian Subterranean Termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Insect Science, 14, 222. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu084</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pimental (1995) Amounts of Pesticides Reaching Target Pests: Environmental Impacts and Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 8, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02286399</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, R., Nitharwal, M., Chauhan, R., Pal, V. and Kranthi, K.R. (2012) Evaluation of Eco-Friendly Control Methods for Management of Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in Cotton. Journal of Entomology, 9, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2012.32.40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, L.B., Xavier, Z.F., Silva, C.B., Faccenda, O., Candido, A.C.S. and Peres, M.T.L.P. (2012) Insecticidal Effects of Croton urucurana Extracts and Crude Resin on Dysdercus maurus (Hemiptera: Pyrrocoridae). Journal of Entomology, 9, 98-106. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2012.98.106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sujatha, S., Vidya, L.S. and Sumi, G.S. (2012) Prey-Predator Interaction and Info-Chemical Behaviour of Rhynocoris fuscipes (fab.) on Three Agricultural Pests (Heteroptera: Reduviidae). Journal of Entomology, 9, 130. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2012.130.136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derbalah, A.S., Hamza, A.M. and Gazzy, A.A. (2012) Efficacy and Safety of Some Plant Extract as Alternatives for Sitophilus oryzaecontrol in Rice Grains. Journal of Entomology, 9, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2012.57.67</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singha, D., Singha, B. and Dutta, B.K. (2013) Potential of Some Plant Extracts to Control Termite Pest of Tea (Camellia sinensis L. (O) Kuntze) Plantations of Barak Valley, Assam, India. International Journal of Tea Science, 8, 3-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Upadhyay, R.K. (2013) Effects of Plant Latex Based Anti-Termite Formulations on Indian White Termite Odontotermes obesus (Isoptera: Odontotermitidae) in Sub-Tropical High Infestation Areas. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 3, 281-294. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2013.34042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castelblanque, L., García-Andrade, J., Martínez-Arias, C., Rodríguez, J.J., Escaray, F.J., Aguilar-Fenollosa, E., Jaques, J.A. and Vera, P. (2020) Opposing Roles of Plant Laticifer Cells in the Resistance to Insect Herbivores and Fungal Pathogens. Plant Communications, 2, Article ID: 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramos, M.V., Demarco, D., da Costa Souza, I.C. and de Freitas, C.D.T. (2019) Laticifers, Latex, and Their Role in Plant Defense. Trends in Plant Science, 24, 553-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.03.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salah, M., Badr, G., Hetta, H.F., Khalifa, W.A. and Shoreit, A.A. (2022) Fig Latex Inhibits the Growth of Pathogenic Bacteria Invading Human Diabetic Wounds and Accelerates Wound Closure in Diabetic Mice. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 21852. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26338-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Musidlak, O., Warowicka, A., Broniarczyk, J., Adamczyk, D., Gozdzicka-Józefiak, A. and Nawrot, R. (2022) The Activity of Chelidonium majus L. Latex and Its Components on HPV Reveal Insights into the Antiviral Molecular Mechanism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23, 9241. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169241</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripathi, A.K. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2022) Anti-Termite and Antimicrobial Efficacy of Latexes from Certain Plant Families. International Journal of Green Pharmacy, 16, 83-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DuBois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A. and Smith, F. (1956) Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28, 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spies, J.R. (1957) Colorimetric Procedures for Amino Acids. Methods in Enzymology, 3, 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(57)03417-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folch, J., Lees, M., Sloane Stanley, G.H. (1957) A Simple Method for the Isolation and Purification of Total Lipids from Animal Tissues. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 226, 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schneider, W.C. (1957) Determination of Nucleic Acids in Tissues by Pentose Analysis. Methods in Enzymology, 3, 680-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(57)03442-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J. (1951) Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1973) Introduction to Biostatistics. W. H. Freeman &amp; Co., Ltd., San Francisco.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandey, L. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2022) Toxicity and Repellency of Citrus maxima Essential Oil Based Combinatorial Formulations against Odontotermes obesus. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 11, 1909-1923.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripathi, A.K. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2022) Toxicity and Repellency of Ficus benghalensis Latex Based Combinatorial Formulations in Odontotermes obesus the Indian White Termite. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 11, 1894-1908.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandey, L. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2022) Effect of Combinatorial Essential Oil Ingredients of Citrus maxima on Percent Wood Weight Loss and Infestation Caused by Indian White Termite Odontotermes obesus. International Journal of Green Pharmacy, 16, 361-375.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripathi, A.K. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2022) Ficus benghalensis Latex-Based Combinatorial Formulations and Its Use for Control of Wood Weight Loss and Infestation Caused by Indian Forest Termite Odontotermes obesus. International Journal of Green Pharmacy, 16, 376-389.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agrawal, A.A. and Hastings, A.P. (2019) Plant Defense by Latex: Ecological Genetics of Inducibiity in the Milkweeds and a General Review of Mechanisms, Evolution, and Implications for Agriculture. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 45, 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-019-01119-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripathi, A.K. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2021) Termite Control by Using Plant Latex from Family Moraceae in High Humidity Zone of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10, 2092-2136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abarca, L.F.S., Klinkhamer, P.G.L. and Choi, Y.H. (2016) Plant Latex, from Ecological Interests to Bioactive Chemical Resources. Planta Medica, 85, 856-868.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitajima, S., Miura, K., Aoki, W., Yamato, K.T., Taira, T., Murakami, R. and Aburaya, S. (2016) Transcriptome and Proteome Analyses Provide Insight into Laticifer’s Defense of Euphorbia tirucalli against Pests. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 108, 434-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.08.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deng, Y.Y., Qu, B., Zhan, Z., Wang, A., Zhou, W., et al. (2019) Bioactive Tigliane Diterpenoids from the Latex of Euphorbia fischeriana. Natural Product Research, 35, 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1616728</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Patil, C.D., Patil, S.V., Borase, H.P., Salunke, B.K. and Salunkhe, R.B. (2011) Larvicidal Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Plumeria rubra Plant Latex against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi. Parasitology Research, 110, 1815-1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2704-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomes, E.H., Soares, F.E.F., Souza, D.C., Lima, L.T., Sufiate, B.L., Ferreira, T.F. and Queiroz, J.H. (2019) Role of Synadenium grantii Latex Proteases in Nematicidal Activity on Meloidogyne incognita and Panagrellus redivivus. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 79, 665-668. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.188129</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hua, J., Liu, Y., Xiao, C.J., Jing, S.X., Luo, S.H. and Li, S.H. (2017) Chemical Profile and Defensive Function of the Latex of Euphorbia peplus. Phytochemistry, 136, 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.12.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bauer, G., Gorb, S.N., Klein, M.C., Nellesen, A., von Tapavicza, M. and Speck, T. (2014) Comparative Study on Plant Latex Particles and Latex Coagulation in Ficus benjamina, Campanula glomerata and Three Euphorbia Species. PLOS ONE, 9, e113336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113336</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nawrot, R. (2017) Defense-Related Proteins from Chelidonium majus L. as Important Components of its Latex. Current Protein &amp; Peptide Science, 18, 864-880. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203718666170406124013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, N.V.M., Souza, B.D.S., Moita, L.A., Oliveira, L.E.S., Brito, F.C., Magalhaes, D.A., Batista, J.A., Sousa, S.G., Brito, T.V., Sousa, F.B.M., Alves, E.H.P., Vasconcelos, D.F.P., Freitas, C.D.T., Ramos, M.V., Barbosa, A.L.D.R. and Oliveira, J.S. (2019) Proteins from Plumeria pudica Latex Exhibit Protective Effect in Acetic Acid Induced Colitis in Mice by Inhibition of Pro-Inflammatory Mechanisms and Oxidative Stress. Life Sciences, 231, Article ID: 116535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.06.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sibi, G., Wadhavan, R., Singh, S., Shukla, A., Dhananjaya, K., Ravikuma, K.R. and Mallesha, H. (2013) Plant Latex: A Promising Antifungal Agent for Post Harvest Disease Control. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16, 1737-1743. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2013.1737.1743</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mendonca, P.M., Lima, M.G., Albuquerque, L.R., Carvalho, M.G. and Queiroz, M.M. (2011) Effects of Latex from “Amapazeiro” Parahancornia amapa (Apocynaceae) on Blowfly Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Post-Embryonic Development. Veterinary Parasitology, 178, 379-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lica, I.C.L., Soares, A.M.D.S., de Mesquita, L.S.S. and Malik, S. (2018) Biological Properties and Pharmacological Potential of Plant Exudates. Food Research International, 105, 1039-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124253-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shivkar, Y.M. and Kumar, V.L. (2003) Histamine Mediates the Pro-Inflammatory Effect of Latex of Calotropis procera in Rats. Mediators of Inflammation, 5, 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/096293503310001619708</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>