<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-1985</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oje.2023.134012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJE-124184</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Particle Size and Pesticide Contamination on Preference and Ingestion Rates by the Tropical Freshwater Shrimp &lt;i&gt;Xiphocaris elongata&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wesley</surname><given-names>X. Torres-Pérez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>Pérez-Reyes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>183</fpage><lpage>198</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In tropical streams, freshwater shrimp are essential to preserve the structure and function of lotic ecosystems. Shredder shrimp play a fundamental role in organic matter decomposition because these feed on detritus. In addition, they are especially important organisms as they connect all trophic levels at food webs. In natural environments, decaying leaf material may accumulate contaminants, including insecticides and herbicides. At these, shredder shrimp can be exposed to these contaminants through ingestion of leaf litter material. The objectives of this study were to evaluate if the shredder shrimp 
  <em>Xiphocaris elongata</em> display a preference for feeding on different plant species and leaf size areas while also assessing their consumption of leaves contaminated with pesticides. We also evaluated acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity as a possible biomarker of pesticide contamination using an immunofluorescence and microscopy imaging approach. Our results revealed that the leaf area and plant species more appropriate for future toxicological studies is 
  <em>Spathodea campanulata</em> leaves, with a leaf area of 0.65 cm
  <sup>2</sup>. This study also showed that sublethal concentrations of malathion and permethrin in leaves seem to have a significant effect on the ingestion rates of 
  <em>X. elongata,</em> which suggests that the presence of these contaminants influenced feeding behavior. Immunofluorescence in cephalothorax ganglia showed a decline in AChE activity when the sublethal dose of malathion and permethrin increased. The observed results suggest that AChE activity can be used as a biomarker to detect and assess permethrin and malathion exposure on shredder shrimp.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Malathion</kwd><kwd> Permethrin</kwd><kwd> Pesticide</kwd><kwd> Puerto Rico</kwd><kwd> Spathodea</kwd><kwd> Toxicology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Freshwater shrimp are essential to preserve the structure and function of tropical lotic ecosystems. These organisms have an important role as biological indicators of stream health, and much is known about their ecology in the tropical island of Puerto Rico [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref3">3</xref>] . A total of 17 species from three families have been described for the island [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref5">5</xref>] . Xiphocarididae plays a fundamental role in organic matter decomposition because these organisms feed on senesced plant parts such as leaves and detritus. They can also serve as prey to various terrestrial and freshwater organisms as wading birds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref6">6</xref>] and diadromous predatory fishes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref7">7</xref>] . Thus, shredder organisms are especially important as they connect trophic levels at food webs. However, few toxicological studies have focused on tropical shredder species.</p><p>In this study, the shredder shrimp Xiphocaris elongata [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref8">8</xref>] was selected as the model organism. Shredder shrimp are essential processors of allochthonous organic carbon inputs and a food source for other aquatic and terrestrial organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref10">10</xref>] . In natural environments, decaying leaf material may accumulate pollutants, including insecticides and herbicides present in surface water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref13">13</xref>] . As a result, these shredder shrimps can be exposed to pesticides by ingesting contaminated leaf litter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref15">15</xref>] . Pesticides can be divided into four main groups: organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids. All these pesticide groups can have a deleterious effect at behavioral, physiological, and biochemical levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref19">19</xref>] , which can result in changes in the stream community's composition, structure, and function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>The ability of shredders to feed on leaf litter selectively suggests that foraging decisions these organisms make can be affected by contaminated leaves. In addition, exposure to contaminated leaf litter can decrease feeding rates, thus reducing individuals’ growth, size, fecundity, and survival [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref22">22</xref>] . The ability of freshwater shredder organisms to use different species of leaf litter as a food source has been evaluated in many studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref25">25</xref>] . Most feeding preference studies focused on the importance of microbial colonization of leaf litter for palatability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref27">27</xref>] . However, shredder organisms can also use fresh and brown unconditioned leaves and are sometimes even preferred [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref30">30</xref>] . Leaves are one of the entry routes of pesticides inside benthic aquatic organisms because decaying leaf material can accumulate pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref31">31</xref>] . Organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides, like malathion and permethrin, inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. Acetylcholinesterase is a critical enzyme in the normal function of the nervous system. The inhibition of this enzyme can result in the accumulation of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the synaptic gap leading to disruption of the nervous system. The inhibition of AChE activity has been used as a biomarker in invertebrates to detect and evaluate contamination by anticholinesterase pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>The objectives of this study were to evaluate if the shredder shrimp Xiphocaris elongata prefers to feed on different leaf species and leaf size areas while also assessing their consumption of leaves contaminated with pesticides. No-choice assays were performed to determine which of the different leaf species and size areas the shredder shrimp would prefer when they had no alternative available. In addition, we evaluated acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity as a possible biomarker of pesticide contamination using an immunofluorescence and microscopy imaging approach.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Collection and Acclimation of Organisms</title><p>Adults of Xiphocaris elongata (cephalothorax larger than 13.0 mm) were collected at R&#237;o Sabana near Sabana Field Research Station (18˚19'29&quot;N, 65˚43'47&quot;W) in Luquillo (elevation 113 above sea level), Puerto Rico. Freshwater shrimp were collected using an electrofishing backpack (Model 12-B, Smith-Root, Vancouver, Washington, USA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref33">33</xref>] . Collections consisted of five upstream electrofishing passes in each sampling reach (10 m). Hand nets were used to collect the organisms. The habitats sampled included riffles, runs, pools, and aquatic vegetation. The cephalothorax length (CL) of each shrimp was measured from the post-orbital region to the end of the carapace with a dial caliper (0.01 mm precision). The measurement from the tip of the rostrum was not used because the length among Xiphocaris elongata varies depending on the presence of fish predators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref3">3</xref>] . Acclimation was performed where the organisms were maintained for at least one week in aerated water, at 20˚C, and with a photoperiod of 12h:12h (light: dark).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Leaves Collection and Preparation</title><p>Three common riparian species found in forested and urban streams on the island, the “trumpet-tree” Cecropia schreberiana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref34">34</xref>] , the “African tulip tree” Spathodea campanulata [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref35">35</xref>] , and the “Guyanese pepper” Piper glabrescens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref36">36</xref>] were used in this study. Green leaves were picked from trees and oven-dried at 55˚C for 48 h. For brown leaves, leaf litter baskets were installed in the riparian forest to collect senescent leaves from trees, and oven-dried at 55˚C for 48 h. To mimic the conditioning history of leaf litter entering the streams, green leaves were picked from trees, air-dried overnight (55˚C), placed in nylon mesh bags, and exposed in the stream for two weeks. At the end of the two weeks, leaves were removed from the bags and dried at room temperature (~24˚C - 30˚C) for 12 h. All leaves were cut into squares of three different size categories (0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>, 1.3 cm<sup>2</sup>, and 2.6 cm<sup>2</sup>), weighed, and placed in aquariums for shrimp feeding trials.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Leaf Size Area and Species Preference Test</title><p>To evaluate X. elongata preference for riparian plant species and leaf size area that prefer, bioassays were performed where each shrimp only had one available size of pre-weighed leaf squares. Organisms (N = 50) were not allowed to feed 48 h prior to the beginning of the test. The exposure tanks (N = 25) (cylinder: diameter—15.4 cm, height—15.4 cm) are assembled with two boxes: the upper box (length—10.6 cm, width—10.6 cm, height—10.6 cm), where the organism will be exposed, which has holes (0.5 cm diameter) in the bottom surface to prevent the contact of the organism with detritus and feces that fall into the bottom of the second box (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). Control tanks (N = 25) (diameter—15.4 cm, depth 15.4 cm) only had leaf squares to evaluate autogenic changes in the absence of the organism. Each tank was filled with 2.0 L of dechlorinated water. The preference test was monitored daily for 96 h. During the test period, temperature (˚C), dissolved oxygen (mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>), turbidity (ppm), conductivity (&#181;S∙cm<sup>−1</sup>), and pH were recorded every day. At the end of the test, the remaining leaf squares were frozen for 24 h to eliminate further breakdown, oven-dried at 55˚C for 48 h, and weighed to determine the feeding rate. All shrimp were measured and weighed before and after the exposure.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Leaves with Pesticide Contamination Test</title><p>To evaluate if Xiphocaris elongata reveal some changes in feeding behavior between contaminated and uncontaminated leaves, bioassays with permethrin and malathion saturated leaves were separately performed. Organisms for these experiments were not allowed to feed 48 h prior to the beginning of the test. In the experimental tanks, one adult shrimp with the pre-weighed leaf squares contaminated with pesticides were added (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). Shrimp were placed in the tanks five days previous to the treatment to facilitate animal acclimation. For each pesticide, two sublethal (nominal) concentrations of permethrin (1.00 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup> μg∙L<sup>−1</sup> and 2.00 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup> μg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) and malathion (6.00 μg∙L<sup>−1</sup> and 7.00 μg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) were used. At the end of the experiments, leaf squares were frozen for 24 h to eliminate further breakdown and oven-dried at 55˚C for 48 h. Finally, they were</p><p>weighed to determine the feeding rate. All shrimp used were measured and weighed before and after exposure. During the test period, temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, conductivity, and pH were measured daily. Ingestion rates were calculated using the following formula: I = ((ΔLw)/(Lwi))(1/TShw); where, ΔLw represents the changes of leaves weight in μg (Lwi − Lwf); Lwi is the initial leaf weight; T is the time expressed in days, and Shw (mg) is the shrimp weight. Ingestion rate is reported in μg∙mg<sup>−1</sup>∙day<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Effects of Pesticides in Nervous Cord: Immunofluorescence and Image Analysis</title><p>In total, 30 individuals of Xiphocaris elongata were subjected to bioassay tests. Twenty individuals were exposed to three feeding trials with leaf squares contaminated with malathion and permethrin. While ten individuals were exposed to three feeding trials with uncontaminated leaf squares. Forty-eight hours after completing the bioassay, the individuals were anesthetized with 10 mL of a 1.09 mM solution of Linalool, and were dissected to remove their nervous cords. Removed tissues were fixed in 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde. The nervous cords were divided into segments to separate the cephalothorax ganglia from the abdominal ganglia. Cephalothorax ganglia were permeabilized in HBSS/Sucrose + 0.1% (v/v) saponin solution (HBSS:Su:Sap) for 10 min and blocked in 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) diluted in HBSS:Su:Sap for 15 min, followed by α-Bungarotoxin, Alexa Fluor™ 555 conjugate diluted in HBSS:Su:Sap: FBS serum for one hour at RT. Then a neuronal stain was added NeuroTrace™ 640/660 Deep-Red Fluorescent Nissl stain (ThermoFisher Scientific/ Life Technologies, Cat. #N21483, Lot. #2047616) (1:25) diluted in HBSS for one hour at RT, followed by the nuclear counterstain DAPI (ThermoFisher Scientific/Molecular Probes, Cat. #D1306, Lot. #2031179) (10μM) diluted in HBSS for one hour at RT. Images were taken on an Olympus Inverted Epifluorescence Microscope with an objective Olympus LUCPlanFLN 40−/0.60 ph2 ∞/0-2/FN22. Image J was used to quantify AChE stained by α-bungarotoxin; we measured the number and intensity of fluorescent pixels in the images by setting the intensity of fluorescence with a control ganglia image and comparing the mean fluorescence intensity in control and pesticide-exposed ganglia.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analyses</title><p>The statistical analyses were performed in JMP Pro version 17 Software Software SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref37">37</xref>] . Factorial analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to test the effects of plant species, leaf area, and exposure treatment. In addition, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare total ingestion rates of contaminated vs uncontaminated leaves and mean fluorescence intensities from the immunofluorescent experiment. A post hoc Tukey’s test was used to identify treatment groups with highly significant differences (P &lt; 0.05).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Leaf Area and Plant Species Preference</title><p>Physicochemical parameters measured during the leaf area and plant species preference assays were: temperature 20.9˚C &#177; 0.1˚C, conductivity 349 &#177; 1.80 μS, pH 7.81 &#177; 0.01, dissolved Oxygen 9.01 &#177; 0.01 mg.L<sup>−1</sup>, and turbidity 174 &#177; 0.69 ppm. Significant differences (Factorial ANOVA, F<sub>(</sub><sub>2,39)</sub> = 49.84; P &lt; 0.001) were found for the ingestion rates of the different leaf sizes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Leaves with an area of 0.65 cm<sup>2</sup> were ingested in higher quantity for all plant species. Significant differences (Factorial ANOVA, F<sub>(</sub><sub>2,39)</sub> = 450.39; P &lt; 0.001) were also found for the different plant species in the preference test. Conditionated leaves of Spathodea campanulata were preferred and ingested in a higher quantity (0.49 &#177; 0.03 μg∙mg<sup>−1</sup>∙day<sup>−1</sup>). Brown Piper glabrescens leaves were the least ingested (0.041 &#177; 0.004 μg∙mg<sup>−1</sup>∙day<sup>−1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Leaves with Pesticide Contamination Test</title><p>Significant differences were observed (ANOVA, F<sub>(</sub><sub>2,24)</sub> = 26.958; P &lt; 0.001) for ingestion rates in the permethrin assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Higher concentration of permethrin had a lower ingestion rate than the control group (0.64 &#177; 0.05 μg∙mg<sup>−1</sup>∙day<sup>−1</sup>). In addition, the ingestion rates of malathion-contaminated leaves were also statically different from the control group (ANOVA, F<sub>(</sub><sub>2,24)</sub> = 24.281; P &lt; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Physicochemical parameters for the permethrin and malathion assays are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effects of Pesticides in Nervous Cord: Immunofluorescence and Image Analysis</title><p>Control and pesticide exposed shrimp ganglia were stained with α-bungarotoxin to label acetylcholinesterase (AChE) at the cephalothorax segments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). α-Bungarotoxin staining appeared qualitatively similar in both control and pesticide exposed ganglia. However, the mean fluorescence intensity was statistically</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Results of Factorial analyses of variance (ANOVA) of plant species (S. campanulata, C. schreberiana and P. glabrescens) of three size areas (0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>, 1.3 cm<sup>2</sup> and 2.6 cm<sup>2</sup>) and three conditionate treatments. df-degree of freedom; NS-not significant; *P &lt; 0.05; **P &lt; 0.01; ***P &lt; 0.001</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sum of Square</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001***</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001***</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001***</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size &#215; Species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001***</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size &#215; Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.506 NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Species &#215; Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001***</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size &#215; Species &#215; Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.197 NS</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>different from the control, permethrin (One-way ANOVA, F<sub>(1,9)</sub> = 7.58; P &lt; 0.05), and malathion (One-way ANOVA, F<sub>(1,9)</sub> = 8.45; P &lt; 0.05) exposed ganglia indicating that AChE activity could be affected by these pesticides.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mean (&#177;SE) of physicochemical for permethrin and malathion assays</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Physicochemical parameters</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dissolved Oxygen (mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turbidity (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conductivity (&#181;S∙cm<sup>−1</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >282.2 &#177; 0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malathion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149.1 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233.6 &#177; 0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Permethrin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.7 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321.9 &#177; 0.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Toxicological feeding experiments with freshwater organisms should be developed with diets that provide all nutritional requirements. It is important to know what particle size area, quantity, and species they should be fed. Food particles should be of a size that maximizes ingestion and minimizes waste [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref38">38</xref>] . Thus, one of the objectives of this study was to determine if the shredder shrimp Xiphocaris elongata demonstrated a preference for feeding on riparian plant species and leaf areas. These results contribute to establish a leaf area and plant species that maximizes ingestion for further toxicological feeding studies. Shredder shrimp feeds on coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM), so probably the preferences of the leaves size are expected to be different depending on plant species.</p><p>In laboratory assays, to minimize the number of variables, only one species and leaf size were provided. When different leaf sizes were offered, X. elongata presented a significant preference for a smaller area than bigger leaf areas (2.6 cm<sup>2</sup>), resulting in a lower ingestion rate for all three plant species. This study demonstrated that Spathodea campanulata leaves, with an area of 0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>, presented the highest ingestion rates, followed by Cecropia schreberiana and Piper glabrescens leaves. Similarly, when different leaves species were offered, X. elongata presented a significant preference for S. campanulata, followed by C. schreberiana and P. glabrescens leaves for all size areas.</p><p>Leaves are one of the entry routes of contaminants for several aquatic organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref31">31</xref>] . As shredder organisms, X. elongata feeding on detritus is exposed to pesticide present in the contaminated plant tissue. Additionally, there is growing evidence that pesticide toxicity is an important issue in aquatic environments, especially in tropical regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref40">40</xref>] . Given that some types of pesticides are present in surface waters, evaluating if these contaminants affect feeding behavior under different concentrations becomes urgent. Based on the results from assays where contaminated and uncontaminated leaves were offered to the shrimp, it was evident that the increasing concentration of permethrin and malathion on leaves significantly affected shrimp feeding behavior.</p><p>For permethrin, the ingestion rate on leaves for X. elongata decreases significantly at lower and higher concentrations of pesticides compared to uncontaminated leaves. Therefore, it seems that the presence of this pesticide influences ingestion rates. The ingestion rate was slightly higher when leaves were spiked with a low concentration of permethrin (1.00 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup> μg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) compared to the higher concentration of the pesticide. In a previous study using a similar assay method, permethrin affected the feeding rate of the insect Plutella xylostella. Leaf consumption was negatively correlated with the quantity of permethrin present, which could have been due to a decrease in feeding rate after ingestion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref41">41</xref>] . Similarly, Armstrong and Bonner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref42">42</xref>] found that permethrin exposure significantly reduced the feeding behavior of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.</p><p>In the malathion assay, an increase in the concentration of the organophosphate pesticide in leaves seemed to have a significant effect on the ingestion rates of X. elongata, which suggests that the presence of this pollutant influenced feeding behavior. In the present study, the ingestion rate was significantly lower when leaves were spiked with a high (7.0 μg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) and low (6.0 μg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) the concentration of malathion. Similar results were found in a previous study using the shrimp Macrobrachium nipponense as a model organism. They found that malathion significantly reduced feeding rates as the pesticide concentration increased [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref43">43</xref>] . Considering the feeding assay results for the shrimp X. elongata, the ingestion rates seem to be affected by the presence of leaves having a high concentration of pesticides. The presence of pyrethroids and organophosphorus pesticides in leaves can influence feeding behavior. Exposure to malathion and permethrin have also shown dose-response relationships: as the pesticide concentrations increased, feeding rates decreased.</p><p>Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity inhibition is well-known as a biomarker indicating the effect of neurotoxic pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref32">32</xref>] . In this study, we used an immunofluorescence approach to evaluate the effect of sublethal concentrations of malathion and permethrin on AChE activity. The immunofluorescence results showed a significant difference in AChE activity between pesticide-exposed ganglia and control group ganglia. AChE activity has also decreased in other species of shrimp exposed to sublethal concentrations of malathion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref44">44</xref>] . Another study found similar results that demonstrated that malathion caused a reduction in Daphnia magna AChE activity levels by up to 50% with an adverse effect on mobility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref45">45</xref>] . For permethrin, few studies have been reported regarding the effect on AChE activity. However, Khazri among others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref17">17</xref>] , showed that AChE activity in the gills of the mussel Unio ravoisieri, significantly decreased with increased concentration of permethrin. The decrease in AChE activity observed in this study could be due to the decrease of enzyme synthesis by the inhibitory characteristic of malathion and permethrin pesticides.</p><p>Generally, a reduction of AChE activity is observed after exposition to sublethal concentrations of pyrethroids and organophosphate pesticides. For example, Jebali among others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref46">46</xref>] , after administering sublethal concentrations of malathion, observed a decrease in AChE activity, after two and seven days of the treatment, compared to controls in the brain tissue of the fish Seriola dumerilli. Chandra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref47">47</xref>] showed maximum inhibition of 77.12% and 72.83% in the brain and gills, respectively, after the exposition of the freshwater catfish Heteropneustes fossilis to malathion. Moreover, Ibrahim among others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124184-ref48">48</xref>] found that AChE activity in the dipteran Chironomus riparius significantly declines when the animals are exposed to permethrin.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Overall, the results showed that the shrimp Xiphocaris elongata preferred a particular leaf area and plant species when no alternatives were offered. The leaf area and plant species more appropriate for future toxicological studies are Spathodea campanulata leave with an area of 0.65 cm<sup>2</sup>. This study also showed that sublethal concentrations of malathion and permethrin in leaves seem to have a significant effect on the ingestion rates of X. elongata, which suggests that the presence of these contaminants influenced feeding behavior. In addition, immunofluorescence in cephalothorax ganglia showed a decline in AChE activity when a sublethal dose of malathion and permethrin increases. The observed results suggest that AChE activity can be used as a biomarker to detect and assess organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticide exposure on non-target species like the common shredder shrimp Xiphocaris elongata. This study highlights the importance of the abundantly distributed shredder freshwater shrimp as a potential bioindicator organism to assess the risk of pesticide contamination in tropical freshwater environments.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are incredibly grateful to our many colleagues, especially Alan P. Covich and Todd A. Crowl, for their collaboration on studies of freshwater shrimp in Puerto Rico.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Torres-P&#233;rez, W.X. and P&#233;rez-Reyes, O. (2023) Effect of Particle Size and Pesticide Contamination on Preference and Ingestion Rates by the Tropical Freshwater Shrimp Xiphocaris elongata. Open Journal of Ecology, 13, 183-198. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2023.134012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124184-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Covich, A.P., Crowl, T.A., Johnson, S.L., Varza, D. and Certain, D.L. (1991) Post-Hurricane Hugo Increases in Atyid Shrimp Abundance in a Puerto Rican Montane Stream. Biotropica, 23, 448-454. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388265</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Covich, A.P. and McDowell, W.H. (1996) The Stream Community. In: Reagan D.P. and Waide, R.B., Eds., The Food Web of a Tropical Rain Forest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 433-460.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Covich, A.P., Crowl, T.A., Hein, C.L., Townsend, M.J. and McDowell, W.H. (2009) Predator-Prey Interactions in River Networks: Comparing Shrimp Spatial Refugia in Two Drainage Basins. Freshwater Biology, 54, 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02121.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez-Reyes, O., Crowl, T.A., Hernández-García, P., Ledesma-Fuste, R., Villar-Fornes, F.A. and Covich, A.P. (2013) Freshwater Decapods of Puerto Rico: A Checklist and Reports of New Localities. Zootaxa, 3717, 329-334. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3717.3.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez-Reyes, O., Crowl, T.A. and Covich, A.P. (2016) Comparison of Decapod Communities across an Urban-Forest Land Use Gradient in Puerto Rican Streams. Urban Ecosystems, 19, 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0490-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miranda, L. and Collazo, J.A. (1997) Food Habits of 4 Species of Wading Birds (Ardeidae) in a Tropical Mangrove Swamp. Colonial Waterbirds, 20, 413-418. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521591</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ocasio-Torres, M.E., Giray, T., Crowl, T.A. and Sabat, A.M. (2014) Antipredator Defence Mechanism in the Amphidromous Shrimp Xiphocaris elongata (Decapoda: Xiphocarididae): Rostrum Length. Journal of Natural History, 49, 1493-1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1005716</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Guérin-Méneville, F.E. (1856) Crustáceos. In: de la Sagra, R., Eds., Historia física, político y natural de la isla de Cuba. Arthus Bertrand, Paris, 28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baxter, C.V., Fausch, K.D. and Saunders, W.C. (2005) Tangled Webs: Reciprocal Flows of Invertebrate Prey Link Streams and Riparian Zones. Freshwater Biology, 50, 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01328.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cummins, K.W., Wilzbach, M.A., Gates, D.M., Perry, J.B. and Taliaferro, W.B. (1989) Shredders and Riparian Vegetation: Leaf Litter that Falls into Streams Influences Communities of Stream Invertebrates. BioScience, 39, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310804</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Englert, D., Zubrod, J.P., Pietz, S., Stefani, S., Krauss, M., Schulz, R. and Bundschuh, M. (2017) Relative Importance of Dietary Uptake and Waterborne Exposure for a Leaf-Shredding Amphipod Exposed to Thiacloprid-Contaminated Leaves. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 16182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16452-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kreutzweiser, D., Good, K., Chartrand, D., Scarr, T. and Thompson, D. (2007) Non-Target Effects on Aquatic Decomposer Organisms of Imidacloprid as a Systemic Insecticide to Control Emerald Ash Borer in Riparian Trees. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 68, 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.04.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rasmussen, J.J., Wiberg-Larsen, P., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Monberg, R.J. and Kronvang, B. (2012) Impacts of Pesticides and Natural Stressors on Leaf Litter Decomposition in Agricultural Streams. Science of the Total Environment, 416, 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.057</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Forrow, D.M. and Maltby, L. (2000) Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Contaminant Induced Changes in Detritus Processing in Streams: Direct and Indirect Effects on Detritivore Feeding. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 2100-2106. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620190820</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilding, J. and Maltby, L. (2006) Relative Toxicological Importance of Aqueous and Dietary Metal Exposure to a Freshwater Crustacean: Implications for Risk Assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25, 1795-1801. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620190820</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García-de la Parra, L.M., Bautista-Covarrubias, J.C., Rivera-de la Rosa, N., Betancourt-Lozano, M. and Guilhermino, L. (2006) Effects of Methamidophos on Acetylcholinesterase Activity, Behavior and Feeding Rate of the White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 65, 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.09.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khazri, A., Sellami, B., Hanachi, A., Dellali, M., Eljarrat, E., Beyrem, H. and Mahmoudi, E. (2016) Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Induced by Permethrin in Gills of the Freshwater Mussel Unio ravoisieri. Chemistry and Ecology, 33, 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2016.1248948</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ter&amp;#231;ariol, P.R.G. and Godinho, A.F. (2011) Behavioral Effects of Acute Exposure to the Insecticide Fipronil. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 99, 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2010.12.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tu, H.T., Silvestre, F., Phuong, N.T. and Kestemont, P. (2010) Effects of Pesticides and Antibiotics on Penaeid Shrimp with Special Emphases on Behavioral and Biomarker Responses. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 29, 929-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.99</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, N.H. and Cummins, K.W. (1979) Influences of Diet on the Life Histories of Aquatic Insects. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 36, 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1139/f79-052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harmon, S.M. and Wiley, F.E. (2010) Effects of Pollution on Freshwater Organisms. Water Environment Research, 82, 1945-2000. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143010X12756668802139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swan, C.M. and Palmer, M.A. (2006) Composition of Speciose Leaf Litter Alters Stream Detritivore Growth, Feeding Activity and Leaf Breakdown. Oecologia, 147, 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0297-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chará-Serna, A.M., Chará, J.D., Zú&amp;#241;iga, M.C., Pearson, R.G. and Boyero, L. (2012) Diets of Leaf Litter-Associated Invertebrates in Three Tropical Streams. Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology, 48, 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2012013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bastian, M., Boyero, L., Jackes, B.R. and Pearson, R.G. (2007) Leaf Litter Diversity and Shredder Preferences in an Australian Tropical Rainforest Stream. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 23, 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467406003920</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crowl, T.A., Welsh, V., Heartsill-Scalley, T. and Covich, A.P. (2006) Effects of Different Types of Conditioning on Rates of Leaf-Litter Shredding by Xiphocaris elongata a Neotropical Freshwater Shrimp. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25, 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[198:EODTOC]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Danger, M., Cornut, J., Elger, A. and Chauvet, E. (2012) Effects of Burial on Leaf Litter Quality, Microbial Conditioning and Palatability to Three Shredder Taxa. Freshwater Biology, 57, 1017-1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02762.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Foucreau, N., Piscart, C., Puijalon, S. and Hervant, F. (2016) Effects of Rising Temperature on a Functional Process: Consumption and Digestion of Leaf Litter by a Freshwater Shredder. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 187, 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1127/fal/2016/0841</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gessner, M.O. (1991) Differences in Processing Dynamics of Fresh and Dried Leaf Litter in a Stream Ecosystem. Freshwater Biology, 26, 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01406.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gra&amp;#231;a, M.A.S. and Cressa, C. (2010) Leaf Quality of Some Tropical and Temperate Tree Species as Food Resource for Stream Shredders. International Review of Hydrobiology, 95, 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200911173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stout, R.J., Taft, W.H. and Merritt, R.W. (1985) Patterns of Macroinvertebrate Colonization on Fresh and Senescent Alder Leaves in Two Michigan Streams. Freshwater Biology, 15, 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1985.tb00227.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McKnight, U.S., Rasmussen, J.J., Kronvang, B., Binning, P.J. and Bjerg, P.L. (2015) Sources, Occurrence and Predicted Aquatic Impact of Legacy and Contemporary Pesticides in Streams. Environmental Pollution, 200, 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1985.tb00227.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lionetto, M.G., Caricato, R., Calisi, A. and Schettino, T. (2011) Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition as a Relevant Biomarker in Environmental Biomonitoring: New Insights and Perspectives. In: Visser, J.E., Ed., Ecotoxicology around the Globe, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pottier, G., Bargier, N., Bennevault, Y., Vigouroux, R., Azam, D., Marchand, F., Nevoux, M. and Roussel, J.-M. (2022) Optimising Electrofishing Settings for Shrimp and Fish in Shallow Tropical Streams. Fisheries Research, 256, Article ID: 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106457</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berg, C.C., Akkermans, R.W.A.P. and van Heusden, E.C.H. (1990) Cecropiaceae: Coussapoa and Pourouma, with an Introduction to the Family. Flora Neotropica Monograph, 51, 1-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palisot de Beauvois, A.-M.-F.-J. (1805) Spathodea campanulata. Flora d’Oware et de Benin, en Afrique. Imprimerie de Fain jeune et compagnie, Paris, 1804-1807. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.101798</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">De Candolle, A.C.P. (1869) Piperaceae. In: de Candolle, A.P., Ed., Prodromus, Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, Vol. 16, Part 1, Parisiis, 235-471.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS Institute (2023) JMP Statistical Discovery LLC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azaza, M.S., Dhraief, M.N., Kraiem, M.M. and Baras, E. (2010) Influences of Food Particle Size on Growth, Size Heterogeneity, Food Intake and Gastric Evacuation in Juvenile Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. L., 1758. Aquaculture, 309, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.101798</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gunnarsson, J.S. and Castillo, L.E. (2018) Ecotoxicology in Tropical Regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 13203-13206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1887-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daam, M.A. and Van den Brink, P.J. (2009) Implications of Differences between Temperate and Tropical Freshwater Ecosystems for the Ecological Risk Assessment of Pesticides. Ecotoxicology, 19, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-009-0402-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoy, C.W. and Hall, F.R. (1993) Feeding Behavior of Plutella xylostella and Leptinotarsa decemlineata on Leaves Treated with Bacillus thuringiensis and Esfenvalerate. Pesticide Science, 38, 335-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2780380410</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Armstrong, K.F. and Bonner, A.B. (1985) Investigation of a Permethrin-Induced Antifeedant Effect in Drosophila melanogaster: An Ethological Approach. Pesticide Science, 16, 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2780160610</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuan, Y.C., Chen, H.C.and Yuan, Y.K. (2004) Sublethal Effects of Paraquat and Malathion on the Freshwater Shrimp, Macrobrachium nipponense. Acta Zoologica Taiwanica, 14, 87-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, A. and Jawahar, A. (2013) Toxic Impacts of Two Organophosphorus Pesticides on the Acetylcholinesterase Activity and Biochemical Composition of Freshwater Fairy shrimp Streptocephalus dichotomus. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 4, 966-972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Printes, L.B. and Callaghan, A. (2004) A Comparative Study on the Relationship between Acetylcholinesterase Activity and Acute Toxicity in Daphnia magna Exposed to Anticholinesterase Insecticides. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23, 1241-1247. https://doi.org/10.1897/03-202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jebali, J., Banni, M., Guerbej, H., Almeida, E.A., Bannaoui, A. and Boussetta, H. (2006) Effects of Malathion and Cadmium on Acetylcholinesterase Activity and Metallothionein Levels in the Fish Seriola dumerilli. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 32, 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-006-0041-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chandra, S. (2008) Toxic Effect of Malathion on Acetylcholinesterase Activity of Liver, Brain and Gills of Freshwater Catfish Heteropneustes fossilis. Environment Conservation Journal, 9, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2008.090310</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124184-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, H., Kheir, R., Helmi, S., Lewis, J. and Crane, M. (1998) Effects of Organophosphorus, Carbamate, Pyrethroid and Organochlorine Pesticides and a Heavy Metal on Survival and Cholinesterase Activity of Chironomus riparius Meigen. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 60, 448-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001289900646</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>