<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7597</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2023.132013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS-124138</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Phylogenetic Relationship and Molecular Divergence Dating Using SRY Gene Polymorphism about Four Ladoum Sheep Lineages in Senegal
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pape</surname><given-names>Madiop Sembène</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fatimata</surname><given-names>Mbaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mama</surname><given-names>Racky Ndiaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbacké</surname><given-names>Sembène</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Genomic Laboratory, Department of Animal Biology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>198</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Animal genetic resources are playing a vital role in livestock production and are essential to food security. The present study aims to contribute to a better understanding genetic local sheep breeds and to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships through the evolution of the SRY gene in four different lineages of Ladoum sheep raised in Senegal. After a brief analysis of genetic diversity, the phylogenetic relationships and molecular dating were inferred through haplotype networks and four phylogenetic reconstruction methods. The different haplotype networks are constructed with NETWORK ver. 5.0.0.0 using the Median-Joining method. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. The robustness of the nodes in phylogenetic trees of the three first methods was assessed by 1000 bootstraps. For Bayesian inference, the posterior probability distribution of the trees was estimated by 4 MCMC chains. 5,000,000 generations were performed for each of the chains by sampling the different parameters every 1000 generations. Results show a low polymorphism. Haplotypic diversity is much higher than the average nucleotide divergence between all pairs of haplotypes. The majority and central haplotype indicates a close relationship between “Batling” and “Tyson” individuals. “Birahim” lineage is very distinct from the rest. Phylogenetic trees confirm two genetically separate clades between “Birahim” and the other lineages. The period of divergence between “Birahim” lineage versus the common ancestor of the other three lineages was 2504 years ago. The polyphyly revealed in “Birahim” lindicates that this lineage does not contain the common ancestor of all individuals who compose it. It could therefore be derived from two or more sheep breeds with a common ancestor, Ovis aries. The monophyletic clade appears to be a group including a common ancestor and all of its genetic descendants. This group, bringing together the other three lineages, is in the process of being structured into sub-lineages. This study is the first to show that there are only two genetic lines within ladoum sheep in Senegal
  .
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Genetic Diversity</kwd><kwd> Phylogenetic Relationship</kwd><kwd> Molecular Dating</kwd><kwd> SRY Gene</kwd><kwd> Sheeps</kwd><kwd> Ladoum</kwd><kwd> Senegal</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The efforts of conservation of animal genetic resources in developing countries are minimal. The conservation programs that had been launched were running without a full spectrum of conservation strategies. With the advent and development of artificial insemination during the last 50 years, the replacement of locally adapted breeds by a narrow range of high-yielding international transboundary breeds, is becoming an area of concern affecting animal genetic diversity in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref1">1</xref>]. This development has led to mounting concerns about the genetic erosion. Consequently, livestock breeds are threatened by the devastating effects of genetic erosion, the most significant of which are the dilution of genetic pool and the disappearance of important adaptive traits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref1">1</xref>]. Local breeds represent an original and unique heritage due to the processes that have shaped them in relation to the history of the region. They are also deeply embedded in the local production systems, through their breeding methods and uses. They have thus developed particularly useful zootechnical aptitudes in terms of production performance and quality of adaptation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref1">1</xref>]. However, zoogenetic resources value goes far beyond their current use, as they provide options for the future. In 2010, the Senegalese herd included 10 million small ruminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref2">2</xref>], and a wide variety of sheep breeds reared in different agro-ecological zones according to different management methods. With the advent of urban breeding and the craze for the Ladoum sheep, several associations have been created to promote and develop this breed. The process of creating the Ladoum breed, which in its early days was driven by passion and prestige, is now of great importance on the national economic level, but also on the scientific level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref3">3</xref>]. In the breeders’ jargon, there are several lineages within this breed, each headed by a male whose reproductive performance has been confirmed by his phenotypic criteria, which are appreciated and measured during the annual competitions organised by the breeders’ associations, but also by the performance of his offspring. This work, which today has resulted in this beautiful and great breed of sheep that is the Ladoum, was done empirically and did not follow the conventional process of creating a breed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref4">4</xref>]. There remains today a scientific void as to its origin and the different breeds involved in this process. Indeed, some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref5">5</xref>] describe it as a subpopulation of Touabire obtained after a long selection on the latter. However, the results obtained on live weight and morphobiometric parameters of the Ladoum breeds described in Senegal by Sall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref6">6</xref>], seem to indicate a racial difference with the Touabire described by Kane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref7">7</xref>] in Mauritania. The Ladoum is thought to belong to the group of short-haired Moorish sheep whose origin is much debated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref8">8</xref>] and is thought to have been introduced to Senegal from Kayes (Mali) from the neighboring Mauritanian region of Hodh el Gharbi, inhabited by the Ladem tribe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref9">9</xref>]. The use of this breed, which is unstable and recent from a geological point of view, in the improvement of the local herd, requires a better knowledge of its genetic structure and evolution. However, to understand the structure of biological communities observed today, it is necessary to trace their history in order to separate the historical components (in the sense of an evolutionary time scale) from the recent ecological components. Indeed, because of their similarity, individuals of the same clade do not constitute independent samples in the statistical sense of the term. The solution is to reconstruct the phylogeny of the studied population to appreciate the relationships of the studied species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref10">10</xref>]. Molecular analysis is based on the neutralist theory of evolution, and postulates that the evolutionary time separating different taxa is reflected by the divergence of DNA sequences. The improvement of molecular techniques has greatly contributed to the multiplication of molecular phylogenies, thus simplifying the access to information contained in the genome. Whatever method of phylogenetic reconstruction used, its principle is based on the assumption that the autonomous functioning of a population, i.e. its reproductive isolation, may result in genetic differentiation, thus providing information on the structure of this population as well as the factors that determine it. Although the importance of population structure in genetics has been recognised since the beginning of the century, the theoretical definition of the population and its subdivisions is not obvious. The subgroups of the species within which individuals have the opportunity to exchange genes are defined as populations. In each of these populations, individuals share a common gene pool that is perfectly characterized by the gene frequencies on which the mutations that underlie all genetic differentiation act. It should be noted, however, that in many developing countries, phenotypic characteristics are emphasized in the characterization of breeds. In Senegal, for example, the Ladoum, Peul-peul, and Djallonk&#233; races, among others, are only recognized on the basis of phenotypic characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref6">6</xref>]. This is why molecular analysis, based on the neutralist theory of evolution and which postulates that the evolutionary time separating the different taxa is reflected by the divergence of DNA sequences, is an essential tool for elucidating the evolution of intermediate structures. The present study aims to contribute to a better understanding of local sheep breeds at the genetic level and to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships through the evolution of the SRY gene in the different lineages of Ladoum sheep raised in Senegal. The SRY gene is located on the Y chromosome. Its mutation rate on the SRY gene appears to be higher than that of other human genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref11">11</xref>]. This gene is a valuable tool in the search for paternal relationships, but also for evolutionary divergences between species and within the same species morphologically or ecologically structured in populations. Is the gene under purifying selection to maintain its function in a pattern correlated with speciation and divergence events in sheep? What are the phylogenetic relationships and their evolution between the different lineages? This study, beyond characterising the genetic diversity and evolution of the four predefined lineages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref12">12</xref>], will attempt to answer these questions more specifically.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site and Choice of Animals</title><p>The study was conducted in the Dakar region, where all the Ladoum “lineages” converge during the fairs. Located on the Cape Verde peninsula, Dakar region covers an area of 550 km<sup>2</sup>, or 0.28% of the national territory. It lies between 17˚10 and 17˚32 West longitude and 14˚53 and 14˚35 North latitude. Sheep farming in this area is intensive and mainly involves Ladoum sheep [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref8">8</xref>]. Animals are raised in enclosures in front of houses or indoors on stall terraces. The choice of flocks was guided by the collaboration of the owners. The males sampled are between 6 months and a year old and are in good health. A total of 47 Ladoum sheep were selected, of which 22 were from the “Batling” lineage, 12 from the “Birahim” lineage, 5 from the “Gorgui” lineage and 8 from the “Tyson” lineage.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Collection and Storage</title><p>Samples were collected from January to April 2022. The biological material for this study consisted of whole blood obtained from the animal’s jugular vein and collected in EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid) tubes of 4 ml capacity, which allow a better long-term conservation of the nucleic acids in the blood. After collection, the blood samples were directly sent to the genomics laboratory of the Department of Animal Biology of the Faculty of Science and Technology of Cheikh Anta Diop University in Dakar. The blood samples obtained were then stored at −18˚C until DNA extraction. See the detail of the sampling in Semb&#232;ne et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref12">12</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. DNA Extraction, Amplification and Sequencing SRY Gene</title><p>Total DNA from the blood was extracted using the standard protocol of the Zymo research kit. 200 μl of blood from each sample were placed in 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes, mixed with 200 μl BioFluid Cell Buffer (digestion buffer) and 30 μl of proteinase K. The whole was incubated in a Bain Marie at 70˚C for one hour. After incubation, the mixture was transferred to a Zymo-Spin column, previously placed in a collection tube. Indeed, the negatively charged DNA is fixed, by ionic interactions, on the positively charged silica membrane. On the other hand, proteins, lipids and polysaccharides are eliminated. The DNA fixed on the Zymo-Spin column is then purified to eliminate all traces of contaminants. This washing was carried out by successive additions of 400 μl of DNA Pre-Wash Buffer, 700 μl and 200 μl of g-DNA Wash Buffer. The debris passes through the membrane by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for one minute. After washing, the column is then placed on a new 1.5 ml eppendorf tube and 50 μl of DNA Elution Buffer previously preheated to 70˚C are placed on the silica membrane to collect the DNA. The DNA extracts obtained were stored at −20˚C. After extraction, Fragments of SRY gene was amplified in a reaction volume of 25 μl with two primers: F 5’CAACTTTCAAGTTTGCCTTATGG-3’ and R 5’ACAGCCCAATCCTGTTATATA-3’. The PCR was performed in an Eppendorf thermal cycler with the initial denaturation performed at 94˚C for five minutes, followed by a repeat of 35 cycles with denaturation at 94˚C for 30 seconds, hybridization of the primers at 48˚C for 40 seconds, elongation of the complementary DNA strands at 72˚C for 40 seconds, and terminated by a final elongation at 72˚C for 10 minutes. Each target gene was amplified by performing an electrophoretic migration on a 2% agarose gel. Sequencing has been outsourced for optimum results. The Sanger method was used to identify the nucleotide sequence of SRY gene.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Sequence Cleaning and Alignment</title><p>The resulting sequences were corrected, manually cleaned and aligned with BioEdit 7.0.8.0 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref13">13</xref>] using the Clustal-W algorithm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref14">14</xref>]. The nucleotide sequences were checked and corrected thoroughly with reference to the electrophoregram. They were subjected to a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) to check the similarity with the reference sequence in GenBank (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Analysis of Genetic Variability and Diversity</title><p>The nucleotide composition of the sequences was calculated with the editor BioEdit. The standard indices of genetic variations (number of polymorphic sites, number of informative sites, number of total haplotypes and by lines) are explained with the MEGA 7 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref15">15</xref>]. The ratio between transitions and transversions and the frequency of nucleotides were also calculated using this same software by the Pattern substitution test. For sequence polymorphism analysis, haplotypic diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref17">17</xref>] were calculated using DNAsp version 5.10.01 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref18">18</xref>]. All these analyses were performed in the study population and for each lineage.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Phylogenetic and Statistical Analyses</title><sec id="s2_6_1"><title>2.6.1. Haplotype Networks</title><p>The haplotype network was constructed. Haplotype networks represent an application of the median linkage method to show phylogenetic relationships between different haplotypes. A minimum haplotype network is characterised by nodes (circles) and branches (links) that connect the nodes. Each node corresponds to a haplotype whose size is proportional to the frequency of the haplotype in the dataset. They are either sequences of the dataset (haplotypes), or median vectors. The links are the differences in characters. A median vector is a hypothetical (often hereditary) sequence that is needed to connect existing sequences in the network with maximum parsimony. Links and median vectors are respectively the number of mutational steps and the gene flow barrier that separate the different nodes. The different haplotype networks are constructed with NETWORK ver. 5.0.0.0 using the Median-Joining method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref19">19</xref>] to show the phylogenetic relationships between the different haplotypes. The construction of these networks is based on coalescent theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref20">20</xref>] which is a retrospective approach that mathematically describes the process of binary merging of all genealogical lineages of a sample of genes back to their closest common ancestor.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6_2"><title>2.6.2. Phylogenetic Reconstructions</title><p>Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using four methods: neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Neighbor-joining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref21">21</xref>] is based on a genetic distance matrix calculation that aims to minimise the total tree length and uses the Kimura-2-P model (=2 parameters) which postulates that transitions and transversions are not equiprobable during the evolution of sequences. The maximum parsimony method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref22">22</xref>], which consists of searching among all possible trees and all possible sequences of ancestral nodes for the combination that requires the least number of evolutionary changes in the phylogenetic tree. The maximum likelihood method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref24">24</xref>], tests all histories that could have generated the current dataset being analysed. It is based on individual traits and uses an explicit evolutionary model. The likelihood of each tree is thus calculated following the chosen model, and the phylogenetic reconstruction chosen is the one for which the likelihood is maximum. The trees developed by the above methods were obtained by MEGA 7 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref15">15</xref>]. The robustness of the nodes was assessed by bootstrapping which is a statistical technique used to assess the robustness of phylogenetic reconstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref25">25</xref>]. A node with a support of 70% or more is considered significant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref26">26</xref>]. Mah&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref27">27</xref>] considers that a threshold of 1000 replicates is a good compromise between accuracy and computation time. Bayesian inference is estimated using the MrBAYES ver. 3.2.5 program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref28">28</xref>]. The latter method and maximum likelihood are described as probabilistic and achieve the best results on test sets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref27">27</xref>]. For Bayesian inference, the posterior probability distribution of the trees was estimated by 4 MCMC chains (three of which were gradually “warmed up” and one cold). 5,000,000 generations were performed for each of the chains by sampling the different parameters every 1000 generations. The degree of convergence of the chains can be checked by examining the evolution of the likelihood function during the run of the “cold” chain to determine the ignition period. Generations that occur during the ignition period are eliminated from the analyses. Thus, conservatively, the first 1, 250,000 generations have been eliminated (25%) and inferences are then made on the following 3,750,000 generations. The reliability of a tree is thus reduced to the reliability of its internal branches (nodes). For the phylogenetic reconstructions, each of the trees was rooted by a referenced gene sequence (AF026566.1) obtained from the GENBANK database.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Degree of Similarity with Referenced Species (BLAST)</title><p>In order to confirm that the identified groups belong to Ovis aries (Linne, 1758), a search of the degree of similarity of the sequences of the studied individuals with referenced species was made. The search strategy consists in finding all the similar segments (HSPs: High-Scoring Segment Pair) between the searched sequence and the sequences of the database. To determine an HSP, words of fixed length are identified in a first step between the searched sequence and the sequence in the data bank. In the case of nucleic acids, this amounts to identity searches between the two sequences on fixed-length segments (generally 11). In a second step, the similarity is extended in both directions along each sequence, starting from the common word, so that the cumulative score can be improved. In a third step, the significance of the similar segments obtained is statistically evaluated. The similarity score is normalised and evaluated in standard units of information (hit). Then, the probability (E-value) of having such a score at random is calculated for this segment length (m) in a data bank containing a total of (n) nucleotides or amino acids. Only significant HSPs, i.e. those with the lowest probability, are retained and ranked. Following this procedure, the sequences obtained from the samples of the four lineages were compared by alignment with other sequences in the nucleotide database of NCBI (Nucleotide Center for Biotechnology Informatics) using the BLASTn tool.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Molecular Dating</title><p>Good molecular dating depends on the trilogy: careful choice of nucleotide substitution model, suitable molecular clock model and good calibration points. In order to date the emergence and diversification of lineages through phylogenetic analysis, molecular dating analyses were performed using a Bayesian approach with the BEAST ver. 1.8.2 package [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref29">29</xref>]. These analyses were performed under the GTR evolution model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref30">30</xref>] with a gamma distribution (Γ) and a proportion of invariant sites (+I). The MCMC analysis was run with 10,000,000 generations sampling every 1000 generations; then the first 1,000,000 generations were eliminated (10%) and inferences are then made on the following generations. The molecular clock hypothesis assumes that substitutions in a sequence occur at a constant rate. The number of observed substitutions would therefore allow us to know the date of divergence between two species, but molecular clocks are more or less rapid between organisms, or even within an organism, under the influence of generation time, repair systems and selection pressure. The molecular clock hypothesis with MEGA using the Maximum Likelihood method is then tested under 2 types of estimates: 1) the constant molecular clock method which postulates that the rate of evolution of lineages is constant. Therefore, we dated the lineages by considering an evolutionary rate equivalent to 2.09 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> &#177; 1.08 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> substitution/site/million years in the genus Rupicapra for the SRY gene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref32">32</xref>]. 2) the relaxed molecular clock method of a model of variation within a dataset that assumes that the substitution rates associated with each branch are drawn independently from a single uncorrelated lognormal distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref33">33</xref>] to estimate the rate of molecular evolution and divergence times between different detected clades. The relaxed molecular clock method has three advantages: 1) No need to test the hypothesis of a constant evolutionary rate throughout eukaryotic history; 2) The incorporation of a priori constraints on divergence time is preferred over the use of calibration points in order to handle uncertainties inherent in the palaeontological data (fossils never match exactly at the nodes of the phylogenetic trees); 3) several independent calibration points can be used simultaneously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref34">34</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Genetic Diversity</title><p>The data set obtained after alignment and cleaning of the sequences revealed 558 sites which 96.77% (540/558) of them are monomorphic and 03.22% (18/558) are variable, of which 01.61% (09/558) of singleton sites and 01.61% (09/558) of informative sites in parsimony (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) are obtained after alignment and cleaning of the sequences. Transversions (51.18%) appear to be more numerous than transitions (48.83%). The 42 sequences are divided into 13 haplotypes. The mutation rate is 0.83; the average number of nucleotide differences is 2.907 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The SRY gene shows a high haplotypic diversity and a low nucleotide diversity except for the “Tyson” population where haplotypic and nucleotide diversities are zero. In the “Gorgui” lineage, haplotypic diversity is maximal and nucleotide diversity is very low (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Phylogenetic Relationships</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Haplotype Network</title><p>The haplotype network (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) showed a differentiated relationship between the different lineages. The results reveal a haplogroup divided into three major haplotypes represented by the “Batling”, “Birahim” and “Tyson” lineages. The haplotypes of the “Gorgui” population appear as transitional (secondary) haplotypes of the “Batling” lineages. The “Birahim” lineage which is distinguished by its haplotypic homogeneity derives almost all from the Amo haplotype by a single mutational step. The “Tyson” lineage, although belonging to the original haplogroup, is highly conserved and does not evolve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Phylogenetic Trees</title><p>Figures 2(a)-(d) represent the topologies obtained with the Neighbor-Joining, Maximum Likelihood, Parsimony Maximun and MrBayes approaches respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Genetic variability parameters of SRY gene sequences</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Genetics variability</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Variabilities</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Number of sites 558</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >558</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Monomorphic sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >540</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="3"  >Variable sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polymorphic sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-informative (singleton)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Informative (parsimony)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Total number of Eta mutations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Number of haplotypes (h)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Average number of nucleotide differences K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.907</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Transition rate (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Transversion rate (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Mutation rate R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Genetic Diversity indices</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Haplotypic diversity (Hd)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >nucleotide diversity (π)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >By population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.643</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00339</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Gorgui”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00269</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Tyson”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.774</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00522</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Globally, the four approaches give the same topologies, all resolving, with slight differences concerning the internal nodes. Two clades are identified: one that appears monophyletic with the maximum likelihood method and polyphyletic with the other methods grouping individuals from the “Birahim” lineage and the monophyletic one grouping individuals from the other lineages. The monophyletic clade is composed of four subclades, each of which is made up of individuals from each of the three lineages. The individuals of the “Tyson” lineage are all found in the same clade which they share in majority with those of the “Batling” lineage. The bootstrap values are globally low.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Degree of Similarity with Referenced Species</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the individuals and their percentage identity with the homologous sequences.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Molecular Dating Results</title><p>The most recent common ancestor, in other words, the period of divergence between the two clades (the “Birahim” lineage versus the common ancestor of the other three lineages) was 2504 years ago (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The results of the Bayesian dating of the molecular clock show a divergence time of between 2300 and 2600 years. Furthermore, the null hypothesis, that the rate of evolution is homogeneous between branches, is rejected. Substitution rates vary significantly between branches.</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage of identity with the homologous sequences</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Homologous species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lineage</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Identity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accession NCBI</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >REC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DUN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BEN1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO.Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOTH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MBA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B.LA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LEG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fr.H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TE.C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RO.N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F.ASSI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F.SURP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F.SUSP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Batling”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prof. H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CH.G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KHE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L.N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M.S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >REP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BEN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DIEG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Birahim”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RIM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Gorgui”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAC.M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Gorgui”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >PAC.N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >“Gorgui”</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F.RIM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Gorgui”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ado1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Gorgui”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MO.G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Tyson”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GEP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Tyson”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JON</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Tyson”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Tyson”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIJ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Tyson”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WAR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovis aries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Tyson”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF026566.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The SRY (Sex-determining Region of Y chromosome) gene is a portion of this DNA molecule, located on the Y chromosome responsible for male gonadal differentiation and conserved throughout evolution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref35">35</xref>]. According to Meadows et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref36">36</xref>], autosomal microsatellites and genetic variation especially in the 5' promoter region of the SRY gene are studied in discrimination research and origins of domestication in sheep [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref37">37</xref>]. In this study, the promoter region and a coding portion of the SRY gene were targeted to highlight genetic diversity, evolutionary mode as well as phylogenetic relationships between four lineages of Ladoum, a local sheep breed from Senegal. Any interpretation of the results will have to take into account the disproportion between the samples, explained by the fact that some breeders are reluctant to let their animals be sampled because of a strong suspicion of mysticism that reigns in this environment.</p><p>A low level of polymorphism is obtained. This low genetic variability of the SRY gene may be due to its specific function as a male determinant, which is transmissible from generation to generation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref39">39</xref>]. Fu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref40">40</xref>] on marsh buffalo was described that in the 5’ region, the promoter sequences of transcriptional regulation were highly conserved confirming the observations made in our study population. Furthermore, it has been shown that mutations in the Y chromosome are very rare and that the SRY gene sequence is very stable within the same species, a group of potentially or actually interbreeding natural populations that are productively isolated from other similar groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref39">39</xref>]. Haplotypic diversity is much higher than the average nucleotide divergence between all pairs of haplotypes. Although Ndiaye [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref41">41</xref>] had shown that the Ladoum breed is the most stable compared to other sheep breeds in Senegal, the comparative trends in genetic diversity indices show a signal of rapid population growth from a small ancestral population that has been effective for a sufficient time for recovery of haplotypic diversity through mutation, but too short for the accumulation of strong sequence differences.</p><p>The patterns in structuring and genetic evolution highlighted by Semb&#232;ne et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref12">12</xref>] are confirmed by visual supports obtained. Networks and trees are two categories of graphs used by biologists working in evolutionary science. Trees and networks differ fundamentally in their forms and meanings. From a mathematical point of view, networks can be defined as “cyclic related graphs”. The adjective “related” indicates that all vertices are connected by links, and “cyclic” indicates that some nodes can be connected by different combinations of links [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref11">11</xref>]. In this study, the majority and central haplotype that groups in higher frequency the “Batling” population followed by the “Tyson” population indicates a close relationship between these two lineages and also suggests their belonging to a common ancestor. The small genetic distance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref12">12</xref>] between “Batling” and “Tyson” and between “Balting” and “Gorgui” is supported by a small number of mutational steps. The “Birahim” lineage is very distinct from the rest of the population, making it a subpopulation in its own right. In any case, the analysis of the phylogenetic trees confirms two genetically separate clades. This very marked separation between “Birahim” and the other lineages could be explained by the evolutionary history in the selection of these local breeds which is therefore relative to the divergence between Ovis aries and Ovis longipes, about 200,000 years ago [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref42">42</xref>]. It is clear that there are currently two genetically identified lineages in Senegal: the “Birahim” lineage and another “lineage” that combines the other three defined earlier in this study. The specificity of the highly conserved “Tyson” lineage should also be noted, even though the single haplotype that constitutes it is found in individuals from “Batling”. The polyphyly revealed by three of the four phylogenetic reconstruction methods in the “Birahim” lineage indicates that this group contains a number of individuals, but does not contain the common ancestor of all. The “Birahim” lineage could therefore be derived from two or more sheep breeds with a common ancestor, as shown by the similarity index of 99.64% to the ancestral reference Ovis aries. This hypothesis is further strengthened by its basal position in the phylogenetic trees. The monophyletic clade, composed of four subclades, appears to be a group that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants, but is rapidly structuring itself, certainly as a result of directed selection; this is evidenced by the homogeneity of the individuals of the “Tyson” lineage, even though they are phylogenetically related to those of “Batling”. Although distinct from the “Birahim” lineage, this monophyletic group is thought to share a common ancestor with Ovis aries, but with a homology rate of 98.98%. As the reference sequence of Ovis longipes does not exist in the genetic databases, the group can only be related to the genetically closer reference sequence. In any case, in the rock engravings discovered in the Sahara, Ovis longipes, a sheep with a busted head, long and strong limbs, a narrow chest, and a short and oblique rump, is reminiscent of the large sheep that is the Ladoum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref8">8</xref>]. Inference of the demographic history of the clades identified as a result of phylogenetic analyses, which is essential to determine the factors that have shaped the evolution of populations, establishes that the divergence between two populations based on DNA sequences increases with time and the rate of evolution or mutation according to the molecular clock principle. This very recent moment of divergence on a geological step between the two clades suggests a rapid reorganisation into a highly mutational microsatellite zone characterised by cytosine-punctuated polyadenylation. Although the origin of the microsatellites remains unknown, a number of arguments suggest that they may result from the random or transpositional appearance of a sufficient number of repeated motifs to initiate the variability-generating process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref43">43</xref>]. The origin of the Ladoum breed from selection between local and exotic breeds can therefore only be confirmed when we have a robust phylogeny involving the various current sheep breeds. The sheep was, with the goat, one of the first domesticated ungulates. It was then transferred by man to the whole world. The first traces of domestication date back 10,300 years. In general, the history of sheep domestication is not well known. The existence of several independent domestication events is suggested by the presence of multiple, highly divergent mitochondrial haplogroups in the domestic species, but the origin of domestic sheep is controversial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref44">44</xref>]. On the basis of archaeological and genetic data, three taxa have been proposed as the origin of the domesticated wild species. These are the Argali (Ovis ammon), the Asiatic Mouflon (O. orientalis), and the Urial (O. vignei), according to the classification of Nadler et al. in Issam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref45">45</xref>]. Archaeological data indicate that several regions would have been involved in locating domestication center(s), most notably eastern Anatolia, the Zagros, and the Indus Valley. Studies based on mitochondrial DNA (MT-CYB) and nuclear DNA (fragments distributed in 12 genes for a total of more than 4000 base pairs) have unambiguously shown that sheep were domesticated from Ovis orientalis once considered as a distinct species, but later recognized as a wild subspecies of the domestic sheep Ovis aries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref44">44</xref>]. The location of the wild individuals that are genetically closest to the domesticated ones indicates that the closest taxon to the domesticated sheep is O. orientalis gmelini, which is located in western Anatolia and northern Zagros (mountains of Iran). Domestication would therefore have occurred in the Zagros [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.124138-ref46">46</xref>]. In this study, the notion of population or race is still relevant, based on the existence of intermediate structures between the individual and the species. It also implies that the population is the place where new properties emerge that cannot be deduced from knowledge of the individuals that compose it.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The existence of populations implies that all individuals of a species are not randomly distributed throughout the species’ range. On the contrary, they are distributed according to particular patterns, the spatial structures, linked in particular to habitat heterogeneity. For other species, the structuring is more of a social origin insofar as certain individuals maintain privileged relationships with each other, particularly for reproduction. It is clear that all organisms live in “populations” but the constitution of these populations, their origin, their development, their size and their functioning pose numerous and difficult problems, and lead researchers to lack a unified definition of this fundamental structure. This study, taking into account the disproportionate number of samples per lineage, has nevertheless shown that: 1) there is a genetic structuring within the Ladoum breed in Senegal; 2) there are only two genetically identified groups within the Ladoum breed in Senegal: 3) the “Birahim” lineage is directly descended from Ovis aries; 4) the “Batling”, “Gorgui” and “Tyson” lineages could be descended from a congener of Ovis aries.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank Ibrahima Semb&#232;ne for the help given to draw the phylogenetic trees. The authors would also like to thank Anna Ndong of Genomics laboratory for her help. They also thank the Mbao breeders who have accepted the blood sampling of their sheep.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Semb&#232;ne, P.M., Mbaye, F., Ndiaye, M.R. and Semb&#232;ne, M. (2023) Phylogenetic Relationship and Molecular Divergence Dating Using SRY Gene Polymorphism about Four Ladoum Sheep Lineages in Senegal. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 13, 179-198. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2023.132013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.124138-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nav&amp;#232s, M.N., Alexandre, G.G., Mahieu, M., Gourdine, J.L. and Mandonnet, N. (2011) Les races animales locales: Bases du d&amp;#233veloppement innovant et durable de l’&amp;#233levage aux Antilles. Carrefours de l’innovation agronomique, 16, 220-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gueye, C. (2020) Caract&amp;#233risation g&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique des moutons de race Ladoum en fonction des locations au S&amp;#233n&amp;#233gal, M&amp;#233moire de Master en Biologie animale, Sp&amp;#233cialit&amp;#233 G&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique des populations, UCAD, Dakar, 30 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paul, M.C.B. (2005) S&amp;#233n&amp;#233gal: Un syst&amp;#232me de sant&amp;#233 animale en voie de privatisation. Th&amp;#232se de M&amp;#233decine v&amp;#233t&amp;#233rinaire: Ecole Nationale V&amp;#233t&amp;#233rinaire d’Alfort, à la Facult&amp;#233 de M&amp;#233decine de Cr&amp;#233teil, 145 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ousseini, H. (2011) Analyse socio-&amp;#233conomique des &amp;#233levages du mouton Ladoum dans la commune de Thi&amp;#232s/S&amp;#233n&amp;#233gal, M&amp;#233moire de Master en Productions Animales et D&amp;#233veloppement Durable, EISMV, Dakar, 35 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diack, F., Traore, E.H., Thior, E.H.Y., Gueye, C., Semb&amp;#232ne, M. and Seck, M. (2021) Etude de quelques caract&amp;#233ristiques morphobiom&amp;#233triques de la race Ladoum du S&amp;#233n&amp;#233gal. International Journal of Advanced Research, 9, 315-323.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sall Sada, M. (2007) Caract&amp;#233risation morpho-biom&amp;#233trique et syst&amp;#232me d’&amp;#233levage du Mouton Ladoum. M&amp;#233moire d’Ing&amp;#233nieur des travaux d’&amp;#233levage (ENCR), Universit&amp;#233 de Thi&amp;#232s, Thi&amp;#232s, 37 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kane, M. (1995) Les races d’animaux &amp;#233lev&amp;#233s en Mauritanie. Bulletin d’information sur les ressources g&amp;#233n&amp;#233tiques animales (FAO), 15 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thior, Y.E.H. (2013) Analyse des strat&amp;#233gies endog&amp;#232nes d’alimentation en &amp;#233levage ovin Ladoum dans la r&amp;#233gion de Thi&amp;#232s et propositions d’am&amp;#233lioration. Th&amp;#232se de doctorat en m&amp;#233decine v&amp;#233t&amp;#233rinaire; UCAD (EISMV), Dakar, 98 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sadio, M.C. (2010) Caract&amp;#233risation g&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique des races ovines sah&amp;#233liennes: Etude du Ladoum et du Touabire. M&amp;#233moire de Master en Biologie animale, Sp&amp;#233cialit&amp;#233 G&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique des populations, UCAD, Dakar, 30 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hillis, D.M. (1997) Biology Recapitulates Phylogeny. Science, 276, 218-219. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5310.218</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katsura, Y., Kondo, H.X., Ryan, J., Harley, V. and Satta, Y. (2018) The Evolutionary Process of Mammalian Sex Determination Genes Focusing on Marsupial SRYs. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 18, Article No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1119-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Semb&amp;#232ne, P.M., Mbaye, F. and Semb&amp;#232ne, P.M. (2023) Genetic Diversity and Demographic Evolution in Four Lineages of Ladoum Sheep in Senegal Using Polymorphisme of the SRY Gene. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 11, 6-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hall</surname><given-names> T.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor &amp; Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT</article-title><source> Nucleic Acids Symposium Series</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 95</fpage>-<lpage>98</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thompson, J., Higgins, D. and Gibson, T. (1997) CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties &amp; Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673-4690. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, S., Stecher, G. and Tamura, K. (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Molecular Biology &amp; Evolution, 33, 1870-1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nei, M. and Tajima, F. (1981) Polymorphisme de l’ADN d&amp;#233tectable par les endonucl&amp;#233ases de restriction. G&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique, 97, 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/97.1.145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nei, M. (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, 34 p. https://doi.org/10.7312/nei-92038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Librado, P. and Rozas, J. (2009) DNASP V5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data. Bioinfromatics, 25, 1451-1452. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bandelt, H.J., Forster, P. and R&amp;#246hl, A. (1999) Median-Joining Networks for Inferring Intraspecific Phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingman J.F.C. (2000) Origins of the Coalescent: 1974-1982. Genetics, 156, 1461-1463. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/156.4.1461</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987) The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees. Molecular Biology Evolution, 4, 406-425.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Felsenstein</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1978</year>)<article-title>Cas dans lesquels la parcimonie ou les m&amp;#233thodes de compatibilit&amp;#233 seront positivement trompeuses</article-title><source> Zoologie Syst&amp;#233matique</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 401</fpage>-<lpage>410</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and Edwards, A.W.F. (1967) Phylogenetic Analysis: Models and Estimation Procedures. Evolution, 32, 550-570. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406616</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Felsenstein, J. (1981) Evolutionary Trees from DNA Sequences: A Maximum Likelihood Approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 17, 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734359</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence of Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using Bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408678</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soltis, P.S. and Soltis, D.E. (2003) Applying the Bootstrap in Phylogeny Reconstruction. Statistical Science, 18, 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1063994980</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mah&amp;#233, F. (2009) Phylog&amp;#233nie, &amp;#233l&amp;#233ments transposables et evolution de la taille des g&amp;#233nomes chez les lupins. Universit&amp;#233 Rennes, Rennes, 253 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huelsenbeck, J.P. and Ronquist, F. (2001) Mrbayes: Bayesian Inference of Phylogenetic Trees. Bioinformatics, 17, 754-755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drummond, A.J., Rambaut, A. and Suchard, M.A. (2015) BEAST: Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis by Sampling Trees. V. 1.8.2. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J.L., Marin, A. and Medina, J.R. (1990) The General Stochastic Model of Nucleotide Substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 142, 485-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80104-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P&amp;#233rez, T., Hammer, S., Albornoz, J. and Domínguez, A. (2011) Y-Chromosome Phylogeny in the Evolutionary Net of Chamois (Genus Rupicapra). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, 272. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-272</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brunel, S. (2019) Le chromosome Y et le g&amp;#232ne SRY. Epid&amp;#233miologie et Sant&amp;#233, 3 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y.W., Phillips, M.J. and Rambaut, A. (2006) Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence. PLOS Biology, 4, 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douzery, E.J.P., Snell, E.A., Bapteste, E., Delsuc, F. and Philippe, H. (2004) The Timing of Eukaryotic Evolution: Does a Relaxed Molecular Clock Reconcile Proteins and Fossils? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 15386-15391. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403984101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sinclair, A.H., Berta, P., Palmer, M.S., et al. (1990) Un g&amp;#232ne de la r&amp;#233gion humaine d&amp;#233terminant le sexe code pour une prot&amp;#233ine pr&amp;#233sentant une homologie avec un motif de liaison à l’ADN conserv&amp;#233. Nature, 346, 240-244. https://doi.org/10.1038/346240a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meadows, J.R.S., Hanotte, O., Dr&amp;#246gem&amp;#252ller, C., et al. (2006) Globally Dispersed Y Chromosomal Haplotypes in Wild and Domestic Sheep. Animal Genetics, 37, 444-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01496.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niemi, M., Bl&amp;#228uer, A., Iso-Touru, T., Nystr&amp;#246m, V., Harjula, J., Taavitsainen, J.P. and Kantanen, J. (2013) ADN mitochondrial et diversit&amp;#233 chromosomique Y dans les anciennes populations de moutons domestiques (Ovis aries) en Finlande: Comparaison avec les races ovines contemporaines. &amp;#233volution de la S&amp;#233lection G&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique, 45, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-45-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meadows, J.R.S., Hawken, R.J. and Kijas, J.W. (2004) Nucleotide Diversity on the Ovine Y Chromosome. Animal Genetics, 35, 379-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01180.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasanain, M.H., Mahmoud, K.G.M., Ahmed, Y.F., et al. (2022) Enquête sur le polymorphisme du g&amp;#232ne du facteur d&amp;#233terminant le sexe (SRY) et l’association des crit&amp;#232res de sperme avec la fertilit&amp;#233 du champ chez les taureaux Buffalo &amp;#233gyptiens. Journal &amp;#233gyptien de chimie, 65, 1-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, Q., Zhang, M., Qin, W.S., et al. (2007) Cloning the Swamp Buffalo SRY Gene for Embryo Sexing with Multiplex-Nested PCR. Theriogenology, 68, 1211-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.07.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndiaye, B. (2019) L’&amp;#233levage des petits ruminants dans le Ferlo: Pratiques d’&amp;#233levage, dynamique des troupeaux et caract&amp;#233risation g&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique du mouton Peul-peul du S&amp;#233n&amp;#233gal. Th&amp;#232se de doctorat en Biologie animale, Sp&amp;#233cialit&amp;#233 G&amp;#233n&amp;#233tique des populations, UCAD, Dakar, 123 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MacHugh, D.E., Shriver, M.D., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, P. and Bradley, D.G. (1997) Microsatellite DNA Variation and the Evolution, Domestication and Phylogeography of Taurine and Zebu Cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics, 146, 1071-1086. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/146.3.1071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jeffrey, S.A., Webb, A. and Schulz, A. (2010) Factors Affecting Goal Difficulty and Performance When Employees Select Their Own Performance Goals: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22, 209-232. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2010.22.1.209</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamidreza, R. (2011) Phylog&amp;#233nie mol&amp;#233culaire du Genre Ovis (Mouton et Mouflons), Implications pour la Conservation du Genre et pour l’Origine de l’Esp&amp;#232ce Domestique. 134 p. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00625145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Issam Belaid (2012) Caract&amp;#233risation morphologique des troupeaux ovins dans la r&amp;#233gion de S&amp;#233tif. M&amp;#233moire: Magister Universit&amp;#233 Farhat Abbas-Setif (Alg&amp;#233rie); Facult&amp;#233 des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, d&amp;#233partement des Sciences Agronomiques, 199 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.124138-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, Z.Y., Duan, T., Sha, J., et al. (2006) Origin, Genetic Diversity, and Population Structure of Chinese Domestic Sheep, Gene, 376, 220-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2006.03.009</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>