<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2023.143018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-123930</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Optimization of the Aqueous Decoction Process of &lt;i&gt;Combretum micranthum&lt;/i&gt; Leaves
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Papa</surname><given-names>Guedel Faye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edouard</surname><given-names>Mbarick Ndiaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samba</surname><given-names>Baldé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alioune</surname><given-names>Sow</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>Khatab Cissé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Cyrille Ayessou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mady</surname><given-names>Cisse</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>UFR Agronomic Sciences, Aquaculture and Agrifood Technologies, Gaston BERGER University, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Center for Studies on Food Security and Functional Molecules (CESAM), Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Water Energy Environment and Industrial Processes (LE3PI), Polytechnic Higher School, Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar (ESP-UCAD), Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>National School of Agriculture, Iba Der THIAM University, Thies, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>277</fpage><lpage>286</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This work proposes to compare the extraction of total polyphenols and the coloring obtained after several series of decoction at 100
  &amp;deg;
  C/20min, of whole or crushed leaves of Combretum micranthum. The total phenolic content of the extracts obtained after decoction was determined by Folin’s method. The color parameters were measured using a colorimeter based on the CIELAB system. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows significant differences (p 
  &lt;
   0.05) on different parameters evaluated. The Minitab 19 softw
  are was used to classify the extracts according to the color parameters (L, A, and B). The results showed that the maximum of polyphenols (21.67%) was extracted in the crushed leaves after three series of decoctions while with the whole leaves the maximum of 16.17% is obtained after six series of decoctions. The concentration of total polyphenols becomes low from four series of decoctions with 0.146 g
  &amp;middot;
  AG
  &amp;middot;
  100 g
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
   
  MS. The red and yellow coloring drops respectively by 85 and 69% with crushed leaves and 64 and 21% with whole leaves. The conductivity and the brix of the extracts fall according to the series of decoctions. These results show that for optimal use of C. micranthum leaves in traditional medicine, crushed leaves and three series of decoctions are indicated and sufficient.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Combretum micranthum&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Extraction</kwd><kwd> Decoction</kwd><kwd> Polyphenols</kwd><kwd> Coloring</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In West Africa, C. micranthum is a plant widely used in traditional medicine. Herbal tea prepared from the leaves is widely consumed for its flavoring, nutritional and medicinal properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref1">1</xref>] . Better known as “kinkeliba” in Senegal, it is a plant that grows in most countries of the Sahel. It is also found in Somalia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref3">3</xref>] . The decoction of the leaves is consumed as a drink to treat malaria (Traor&#233;, 2010), for its diuretic action, antidiabetic, antibacterial and antifungal activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref8">8</xref>] . For the treatment of liver failure, constipation, bronchitis and cough, the leaves are used as a 10% infusion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref5">5</xref>] . According to Burkill (1985), fruit powder is used to treat weeping skin diseases in children (impetigo type) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref9">9</xref>] . In Senegal, the dried leaves are sold tied in twigs and tied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The phenolic compounds in kinkeliba leaves can act as antioxidants by extinguishing biological systems with their phenolic ring and multiple hydroxyl moieties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref10">10</xref>] . Compounds that exhibit such antioxidant activity may also exhibit anti-inflammatory activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref10">10</xref>] . The duration of decoction, the temperature of infusion and maceration remain parameters not controlled by the populations for the extraction of total polyphenols. In West Africa, particularly in Senegal, for the preparation of breakfast herbal tea, the same quantity of dried leaves of Combretum micranthum is used for several decoctions with an addition of water every day until the decoction is completely discolored. A prolonged decoction denatures the phenolic compounds and reduces the quality of the extracts obtained, not to mention the energy expenditure. Thus, the main objective of this work is to determine the optimal conditions for obtaining the decoction of C. micranthum.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material</title><p>The dried leaves of Combretum micranthum are harvested from the Thi&#232;s region of Senegal and dried in the shade. One batch was coarsely ground with a blender (Moulinex Blender 5 Speeds) for testing purposes. Generally, the leaves are packaged with the stems of the plant and sold in the various markets in Dakar (Figures 1-3).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Method of Extraction by Series of Decoction</title><p>Decoction is a method of extracting soluble compounds by immersing crushed or whole C. micranthum leaves in constantly boiling water at 100˚C for 20 minutes. The leaves are first sorted manually then weighed and 25 &#177; 0.1 g of leaves are packaged in plastic bags for the purpose of the various tests. A volume of 1500 ml of tap water is used. The water is brought to a constant boil at 100˚C and then the 25 g of leaf are introduced. A stopwatch is started as soon as the 25 g of leaves are introduced. After 20 minutes of decoction at 100˚C, the extract is recovered and filtered on wahtman paper for the analysis of the various parameters. After this first decoction, the leaves are washed and rinsed for a new decoction with the addition of 1500 ml of water. This same operation is repeated for up to 10 decoction badges on the same leaves under the same conditions. Parameters such as the amount of total polyphenols, the color, the conductivity, the pH and the amount of soluble solids (brix) are analyzed after each series.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Analytical Tracking Parameters</title><p>The content of the compounds total phenolics—extracts of Combretum micranthum was estimated using the Folin-Ciocalteu method (Ertas, 2014) and the results expressed in grams of gallic acid per 100 grams of dry matter (g∙AG∙100 g<sup>−1</sup> MS). The color of the extracts was measured using a colorimeter (type: KONICA MINOLTA. Japan) based on the CIELAB color system (L*, a*, b* and L*, C*, h, YI). The parameters L*, a*, b* describe the colors black-white, Green-Red and Blue-Yellow respectively: L* (0 = Black, 100 = White); a* (−a = Green, +a = Red); b* (−b = Blue, +b = Yellow). Measurements were made 3 times for each sample.</p><p>Brix is measured according to a standardized NA 5669 method using an Abbe ATAGO universal refractometer with digital reader and temperature correction. It is expressed as a percentage by mass (g/100g of extract). The conductivity is determined by a conductivity meter integrating the measurement of the pH (Hanna instruments, Germany) at 25˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analyzes</title><p>The results were subjected to a one-way ANOVA analysis of variance with R software version 3.2.4 Revised (2017) and Minitab19 software. The X value of each sample is assigned a superscript letter (X<sup>(</sup><sup>i)</sup> where i = a, b, c,). Samples with the same letter are not statistically different at the 5% level.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Monitoring of Physical Parameters</title><p>The values of physical parameters such as conductivity, pH and soluble solids in decoction with whole Combretum micranthum leaves are represented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The results show that the maximum conductivity and dry matter are reached from the first decoction carried out in 20 minutes. However, the extracts become more and more basic during the series of decoctions; from 8.76 to 8.93 for the whole leaves, and from 7.52 to 8.67 for the crushed leaves.</p><p>The results reveal for the first decoction with the use of crushed leaves a conductivity of 1138.33 μs/cm at 25˚C which gradually drops according to the series</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Monitoring of physical parameters during decoction of whole leave</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of decoction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conductivity in &#181;s/cm at 25˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH at 25˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soluble solids g/100g</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 1 (20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1067.22<sup>a</sup> &#177; (8.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.76<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 2 (40 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442.09<sup>b</sup> &#177; (5.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.74<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 3 (1H)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429.23<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.80<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.02)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 4 (1H 20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >419.10<sup>c,d</sup> &#177; (2.73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.88<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 5 (1H 40 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.78<sup>d</sup> &#177; (1.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.91<sup>b,c</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 6 (2H)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.38<sup>d</sup> &#177; (1.26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92<sup>a,b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 7 (2H 20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >411.28<sup>e</sup> &#177; (1.02)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.94<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 8 (2H 40 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >402.24<sup>e,f</sup> &#177; (2.10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.93<sup>a,b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 9 (3H)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >394.98<sup>f,g</sup> &#177; (2.32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.93<sup>a,b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 10 (3H 20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387.16<sup>g</sup> &#177; (5.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92<sup>a,b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Monitoring of physical parameters during decoction of crushed leaves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of decoction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conductivity in &#181;s/cm at 25˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH at 25˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soluble solids g/100g</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 1 (20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1138.33<sup>a</sup> &#177; (3.51)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.52<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.02)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 2 (40 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >437.86<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.68<sup>bc</sup> &#177; (0.06)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35<sup>ab</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 3 (1H)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426.26<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.16<sup>ab</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 4 (1H 20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >425.30<sup>b</sup> &#177; (1.40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.37<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 5 (1H 40 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426.20<sup>b</sup> &#177; (3.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.50<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 6 (2H)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >417.83<sup>b</sup> &#177; (1.85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.52<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 7 (2H 20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.70<sup>b</sup> &#177; (2.40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.60<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 8 (2H 40 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405.40<sup>b</sup> &#177; (1.80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.62<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 9 (3H)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >407.43<sup>b</sup> &#177; (4.75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.68<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction 10 (3H 20 mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406.20<sup>b</sup> &#177; (5.30)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.67<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>of decoctions to reach the value 406.2 μs/cm after 10 badges of decoction. This same tendency is observed for the decoction with the whole leaves of Combretum micranthum, the conductivity drops from 1067.22 &#177; (8.82) &#181;s/cm to 387 &#181;s/cm after 10 decoction badges. This conductivity is directly proportional to the quantity of dissolved substances, so the greater the extraction of dissolved substances, the more the conductivity increases. With Combretum leaf crushing micranthum the extraction of dissolved substances is maximum and greater than with whole leaves. This extraction is associated with the extraction of minerals and other compounds present on the leaves (calcium salt, magnesium salt, sodium salt, potassium salt, and citrate) which increases the conductivity of the decocted solution. Conductivity remains a good indicator for monitoring the extraction of soluble substances contained in the leaves.</p><p>The results show an increase in pH as a function of the number of decoction badges with the use of whole leaves or crushed leaves. The pH increases by 15% between the first and the tenth decoction with crushed leaves with a value which evolves from 7.52 to 8.67. This same trend is observed with the decoction of whole leaves, the pH increases from 8.77 to 8.93 or 1.8% more. The increase in pH with crushed leaves after ten decoction badges is 11.5 times greater than the increase in pH with the use of whole leaves. This significant increase in pH will be associated with the faster extraction of organic compounds from crushed leaves than from whole leaves. With the renewal of the liquid phase, the diffusion continues until exhaustion of the extraction of the solid phase and the pH remains constant this same phenomenon is reported by Dibert in 1989 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Monitoring of Total Polyphenolic Compounds</title><p>The concentrations of total polyphenols extracted with the decoction of crushed leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) or with whole leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) are presented below.</p><p>The results show that the content of total polyphenols decreases according to the number of aqueous decoctions whatever the nature of the leaves, going from 3.626 to 0.027 g∙AG∙100 g<sup>−1</sup> MS for the crushed leaves and from 2.613 to 0.023 g∙AG∙100 g<sup>−1</sup> MS for whole leaves. It emerges from its results that the content of total polyphenols obtained in the first decoction at 100˚C for 20 min is always maximum. Moreover, it is 1.38 times higher with crushed leaves than with whole leaves. After ten series of extraction with crushed leaves, the decoction extracts 5.282 g∙AG∙100 g<sup>−1</sup> MS or 23.68% of the total polyphenols extracted compared to 22.3 g∙AG∙100 g<sup>−1</sup> MS reported by Ousmane in 2017 and 3.697 g∙AG∙100 g<sup>−1</sup> MS with whole leaves or 16.57% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref12">12</xref>] . The extraction is more optimized with crushed leaves. Indeed, the crushing of the leaves makes it possible to intensify the solvent transfer phenomena through the increase in the specific exchange surface and the reduction of the distance of penetration through the crushed leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref13">13</xref>] . Similar results have been recorded by several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref15">15</xref>] . Bernaud in 2014 reported contents of 20% to 30% DM in green tea leaves. Three decoction badges using crushed leaves extract 21.67% of total polyphenols and 16.17% for whole leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123930-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Tracking of Color Parameters According to the Number of Decoctions</title><p>The evolutions of the color parameters (A, B and L) are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>The results reveal a drop in color parameters (A) and (B) and an increase in clarity (L) depending on the decoction badges (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The color</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Color parameters depending on the number of decoction with crushed leaves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Color settings</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.07<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.47)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.69<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.97<sup>g</sup> &#177; (1.01)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.70<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.56<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.23<sup>f</sup> &#177; (0.15)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.14<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.40<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.10<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.19)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.42<sup>e</sup> &#177; (1.81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.39<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.29<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.16<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.15<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.19)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.75<sup>f</sup> &#177;(0.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.21<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72<sup>g</sup> &#177; (0.17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.13<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.17)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17<sup>f</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.84<sup>h</sup> &#177; (0.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.23<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03<sup>g</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.89<sup>h</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.67<sup>ab</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51<sup>hj</sup> &#177; (0.06)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.77<sup>ab</sup> &#177; (0.03)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73<sup>ij</sup> &#177; (0.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.19<sup>ab</sup> &#177; (0.12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 &#177; (0.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.47<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.00)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Color parameters depending on the number of decoctions with whole leaves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Color settings</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.20<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.02)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.07<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.15<sup>i</sup> &#177; (0.12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.71<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.36<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.23<sup>h</sup> &#177; (0.12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.66<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.13<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.43<sup>g</sup> &#177; (0.09)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.56<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.83<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.83<sup>f</sup> &#177; (0.09)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.46<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.31<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.00<sup>e</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66<sup>f</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.12<sup>f</sup> &#177; (0.06)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.42<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46<sup>g</sup> &#177; (0.10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.78<sup>g</sup> &#177; (0.02)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.84<sup>c</sup> &#177; (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37<sup>gh</sup> &#177; (0.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56<sup>h</sup> &#177; (0.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.82<sup>b</sup> &#177; (0.06)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30<sup>gh</sup> &#177; (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.60<sup>i</sup> &#177; (0.11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.26<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.07)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction No. 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42<sup>h</sup> &#177; (0.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20<sup>d</sup> &#177; (0.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.51<sup>a</sup> &#177; (0.07)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>parameter (L) corresponds to lightness or luminosity, according to a psychometric scale ranging from zero to 100. Here the values 98.51 &#177; (0.07) and 98.47 &#177; (0.00) obtained at the tenth decoction in both cases represent white or total reflection (colorless); the values 69.15 &#177; (0.12) and 64.97 &#177; (1.01), represent the partial absorption of the colors. An extraction of 64% of the red color and 21% of the initial yellow is observed from the fourth decoction with the whole leaves. These two colors disappear from decoction No. 6. For the decoction using crushed leaves, an extraction of 86% of the yellow color and 99% of the red color is observed after 8 decoctions.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> show the evolution of the coloring of the solutions obtained after decoction with crushed leaves or whole leaves.</p><p>The results reveal a degradation of the red and yellow color giving way to colorless depending on the number of decoctions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Reddening or greening is expressed by the value of the color parameter (A). Yellowing or bluing is represented by parameter (B). The R software made it possible to classify the 10 decoction badges according to the color of the extract obtained (decoction N˚ 1-2, decoction N˚ 3-4-5, decoction N˚ 6-7 and decoction N˚ 8-9-10) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Work on the optimization of the process of decoction of the leaves of Combretum micranthum has shown that the aqueous decoction with the use of crushed leaves of C. micranthum is the best method for extracting total polyphenols. The results reveal on the one hand, that a number of three decoctions at 100˚C/20min with crushed leaves are sufficient to extract with water 21.67% of the total polyphenols against five decoctions with whole leaves to extract only 16.17% total polyphenols. On the other hand, six decoctions with the use of whole dry leaves make it possible to extract 64% of the red color and 21% of the yellow color and eight decoctions to extract 99% of the red color and 86% of the yellow color for l use of crushed leaves. The use of powdered dried leaves and crushed stems in order to quantify and determine the antioxidant power of each part of the plant is an avenue to be studied.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was carried out at the level of the Water, Energy, Environment and Industrial Processes Laboratory (LE3PI) and at the Center for Studies on Food Security and the Development of Functional Molecules (CESAM) of the Polytechnic School of Dakar University Cheikh Anta Diop (Senegal). The authors warmly thank the laboratory managers and all the staff.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Faye, P.G., Ndiaye, E.M., Bald&#233;, S., Sow, A., Ciss&#233;, O.K., Ayessou, N.C. and Cisse, M. (2023) Optimization of the Aqueous Decoction Process of Combretum micranthum Leaves. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 14, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2023.143018</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.123930-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faty, G. (2019) Traditional Medicine of Senegal: Examples of Some Medicinal Plants from the Traditional Senegalese Pharmacopoeia. Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Africa News (2017) Kinkeliba Tea Culture in Togo. Africa News.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shifa, A.D. (2015) The Virtues of Sekhew (kinkéliba) Drink Remedy for Many Ailments. Shifa-Sante Bien Etre.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Traore, M. (2010) The Use of Traditional African Pharmacopoeia in the New Millennium: Case of Women Herbalists of Bamako. Center for Studies and Actions for Self-Development, 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diallo, D., Guissou, P.I., Haidara, M., Tall, C. and Kasilo, O.M. (2010) Research on Traditional African Medicine: Hypertension. Decade of African Traditional Medicine, 59-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chika, A. and Bello, S.O. (2010) Antihyperglycaemic Activity of Aqueous leaf extract of Combretum micranthum (Combretaceae) in Normal and Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 129, 34-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.02.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taura, D.W., Arzai, A.H. and Oyeyi, T.I. (2009) Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activities of Combretum micranthum. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 2, 183-185. https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v2i1.58540</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jacques, F. and Weniger, B. (2018) A World Tour of Healing Plants: Africa, Americas, China, Overseas, Europe. 98-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burkill, H.M. (1985) The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, J.K., Tsai, S.H. and Lin-Shiau, S.Y. (2001) Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Tumor Effects Offlavonoids and Flavanoids. Drug Future, 26, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1358/dof.2001.026.02.858703</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diber, K. (1989) Solvent Extraction of Oil and Chlorogenic Acid from Green Coffee Part I: Equilibrium Data. Journal of Food Engineering, 10, 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(89)90017-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ousmane, N., Amadou, D., Madani, M., Rokhaya, G., Khadydiatou, T. and Omar, S.S. (2017) Comparative Study of the Composition of Aqueous Extracts of Green Tea (Camellia Sinensis). International Journal of Progressive Science and Technology (IJPSAT), 5, 71-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mafart, P. and Béliard, E. (1993) Industrial Food Engineering Separative Techniques. Techniques and Documentation-Lavoisier, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonnaillie, C., Salacs, M., Vassiliova, E. and Saykova, I. (2012) Study of the Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Peanut Shells (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Industrial Engineering, 7, 35-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jokié, S., Velic, D., Bilié, M., Bucié-Kojié, A., Plan inié, M. and Tomas, S. (2010) Modeling of the Process of Solid-Liquid Extraction of Total Polyphenols from Soybeans. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 28, 206-212. https://doi.org/10.17221/200/2009-CJFS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123930-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernard, A. (2014) Consumption of Tea and Medicines: What Should the Pharmacist Know? Doctoral Thesis in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, University of Nantes, Nantes.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>