Diabetes is a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces [1]. It is “a group of metabolic diseases characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or both” manifested by carbohydrates, fat, protein metabolism abnormality [2]. If untreated high blood sugar can damage the nerves, eyes, kidneys, and other organs [3]. The global diabetes prevalence in 2019 is estimated to be 9.3% (463 million people), rising to 10.2% (578 million) by 2030 and 10.9% (700 million) by 2045. According to the Lancet [4], the number of people with diabetes has risen from 108 million in 1980 to 422 million in 2014. Diabetes prevalence has been rising more rapidly in middle- and low-income countries. The prevalence is higher in urban (10.8%) than rural (7.2%) areas, and in high-income (10.4%) than low-income countries (4.0%). One in two (50.1%) people living with diabetes do not know that they have the disease. The global prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance is estimated to be 7.5% (374 million) in 2019 and is projected to reach 8.0% (454 million) by 2030 and 8.6% (548 million) by 2045 [5].

According to the Gebremariam, et al., 9th Edition, an estimated prevalence in Africa is 19.4 million adults aged 20 - 79 years living with diabetes in the IDF Africa Region in 2019, representing a regional prevalence of 3.9%. Africa is the region with the highest proportion of undiagnosed diabetes, with 60% of adults currently living with diabetes unaware of their condition [6]. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Africa Region (AFR) includes 49 diverse sub-Saharan countries and territories and currently represents 34 diabetes organizations in 29 countries.

The prevalence of Diabetes in Zambia is 4.1% in males, and 4.4% in females with a total of 4.2% of the total population of 16,212,000 [4]. Zambia is one of the 47 countries of the IDF African region. According to IDF African region, Zambia has a total adult population of 8,001,400 and the Prevalence of diabetes in adults is at 3.4%. The Total number of cases of diabetes in adults is 273,800 [5].

Due to the chronicity of the condition, a person with diabetes should cooperate in all phases of the control and treatment and should be able to do self-care activities. Self-care is crucial for the control of diabetes and includes self-monitoring of blood glucose, diet, setting insulin dosage, and doing regular physical activity [7]. As a chronic condition, Diabetes can be managed effectively however, if poorly managed it can lead to potential complications that include heart disease, stroke, kidney damage, and nerve damage [8]. Effective management required adequate information on part of the patients, and positive self-care practices

According to a study conducted by Saleh et al. [9], whose aim was to assess the effect of diabetes education on knowledge improvement and attitudes towards type 2 diabetes and related self-care activities in the patients, the study suggested that Diabetes-related self-care activities depend on the ability of patient to manage his/her daily life. Evidence shows that the individuals with diabetes often have inadequate knowledge of the nature, risk factors and associated complications. In fact, people with DM communicate a particularly high need for information, higher than people with cancer or cardiovascular diseases, for example. It can therefore be concluded that people with DM do not feel adequately informed about their condition or regarding medication use. Therefore, it was important that a study be conducted to determine the information needs on diabetes and self-care practices among diabetic patients in Mbala, Northern Zambia.

The interview was conducted with 105 participants of whom more than half 57.1% of the participants were males. Slightly more than half 51.4%, of respondents were aged between 41 to 60 years. More than half 64.8%) were married as presented in Table 1. Table 2 shows that majority 61 (58.1%) respondents had high knowledge levels, whereas Table 2 shows that majority 82 (78.1%), had a negative attitude. Table 2 shows that majority 65 (61.9%), had high need for information and majority 90 (85.7%), had poor self-care practices.

Table 3 shows that there was a statistically significant association between knowledge levels and self-care practices of Diabetic patients, between attitude and self-care practices of Diabetic patients and between information needs and knowledge levels of Diabetic patients. However, there was no statistically significant association between information needs and attitude of Diabetic patients.

Table 4 shows the binary logistic regression model was tested for multicollinearity, Hosmer and Lemeshow test of fitness for data, and omnibus test of model coefficients and classification accuracy. The dependent variable was self-care practice: Good (1) and Poor (0). The results of the binary logistic regression analysis showed that holding other variables constant, patients who had low knowledge levels were 0.080 times less likely to achieve good self-care practices compared to those who had high knowledge levels, and this effect was highly significant (OR: 0.080, CI: 0.009 - 0.623, P < 0.020). Further analysis showed that patients who had a negative attitude were 0.174 less likely to achieve good self-care practices compared to those who had a positive attitude and this effect was highly significant (OR: 0.174, CI: 0.049 - 0.584, P < 0.006).

Table 5 shows the binary logistic regression model was tested for multicollinearity, Hosmer and Lemeshow test of fitness for data, and omnibus test of model coefficients and classification accuracy. The dependent variable was information needs: Good (1) and Poor (0). The results of the binary logistic regression analysis showed that holding other variables constant, patients who had low knowledge levels were 2.263 times more likely to have a high need for information compared to those who had high knowledge levels, and this effect was significant (OR: 2.263, CI: 0.957 - 5.104, P < 0.05).

Results revealed that majority 57.1%, were males while 42.9% were female. The results correspond with the study that was conducted by Takele [9] which showed that more than half of the respondents (55.8%) were males. These results are in line with a study conducted by Nordström, et al. [10], which revealed the prevalence of type 2 Diabetes is higher in males (14.6%) than in women (9.1%). Therefore, the results of these studies showed a higher number of males than in females. Consistence was also found with a study conducted by Alodhayani, et al. [11], whose results showed female patients having more self-care management practices than male patients (B: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.10 - 0.96 (P = 0.015)). therefore, it is highly likely that the high number of males compared to females could be associated with poor self-care practices among males thus, the higher number of male re-attendances and admissions to the hospital.

According to the study results, there was an association between knowledge and self-care practices among Diabetic patients. Therefore, in this study, respondents with high knowledge also had good self-care practice. These findings are similar to the findings of Saleh, et al. [12], whose study reviewed a significant relationship, existed between basic knowledge and glucose monitoring among newly diagnosed type 2 DM patients. Results also revealed an association between attitude of Diabetic patients and self-care practices among Diabetic patients. Therefore, majority of respondents who had a negative attitude also had poor self-care practices. These findings are similar to the findings of Kassa [13], whose studies revealed 26.8% of the respondents had good attitude towards diabetes mellitus self-care.

With regard to the dependent variable (information needs), a statistical significant association was found with knowledge. In this study, it was revealed that there was an association between knowledge on DM and the need for information among Diabetic patients. However, the sole respondent with high knowledge also demonstrated low need for information. Therefore, in this study, the majority of respondents with low knowledge had high need for information. Regarding attitude, there was no association with the need for information among Diabetic patients. Therefore, in this study, whether one had a positive or negative attitude, it did not influence the need for information.

On multivariable logistic analysis patients with low knowledge levels were 0.080 times less likely to achieve good self-care practices (OR: 0.080, CI: 0.009 - 0.623, P < 0.020) and those with a negative attitude were 0.174 less likely to achieve good self-care practices (OR: 0.174, CI: 0.049 - 0.584, P < 0.006). Patients who had low knowledge levels were 2.263 times less likely to achieve good self-care practices compared to those who had high knowledge levels, and this effect was highly significant (OR: 2.263, CI: 0.957 - 5.104, P < 0.055).

These findings are similar to the findings of Saleh, et al. [12], whose study reviewed that total basic knowledge (TBK) and business profession were significant independent predictors of good practice. Similarly, in a study conducted by Watcharanat, et al. [14], results revealed that the knowledge about diabetes, attitude towards diabetes, and social support towards diabetes positively affected self-care behavior towards diabetes with the statistical significance of 0.05.

The binary logistic regression test was used to analyze the combined impact of dependent (self-care practices) (information needs) and independent variables (knowledge) and (attitude). All variables (dependent and independent variables) were coded. The results of the logistic regression analysis according to Table 4 showed that holding other variables constant, patients with low knowledge levels were 0.080 times less likely to achieve good self-care practices, this effect was highly significant with the odds ratio of (OR: 0.080, CI: 0.009 - 0.623, P < 0.020). Further analysis showed that patients with a negative attitude were 0.174 less likely to achieve good self-care practices, this effect was highly significant with the odds ratio of (OR: 0.174, CI: 0.049 - 0.584, P < 0.006). These findings are similar to the findings of Saleh, et al. [12], whose study reviewed that total basic knowledge (TBK) and business profession were significant independent predictors of good practice. Similarly, in a study conducted by Watcharanat, et al. [14], results revealed that the knowledge about diabetes, attitude towards diabetes, and social support towards diabetes positively affected self-care behavior towards diabetes with the statistical significance of 0.05.

In another analysis to determine predictors of need for information using multivariate binary logistic regression model at 95% level of significance, it was discovered that knowledge predicted need for information of patients (Table 5). Thus, patients who had low knowledge levels odds ratio (2.263) were more likely to have a high need for information (Table 5).

With regard to the dependent variable (information needs) and independent variable (knowledge), results of the logistic regression analysis according to Table 5 showed that holding other variables constant, patients who had low knowledge levels were 2.263 times more likely to have a high need for information, this effect was highly significant with the odds ratio of (OR: 2.263, CI: 0.957 - 5.104, P < 0.05).

The study identified two factors (negative attitude) and (lack of information) as being significant in influencing self-care practices among Diabetic patients. This implies that, in order to improve self-care practices, there is a need for promoting a positive attitude and provide adequate information on Diabetes self-care in order to improve the quality of life.

The study sample size (n = 105) was limited, thus generalization of results should be done with caution as it only represented views of patients who accessed medical services from Mbala general hospital. The sample size comprised patients from the rural and peri-urban settings hence the result may not be generalized for the rest of Zambia. The case may be different for patients in urban towns, as urban hospitals have availability of specialized health professionals to provide sufficient information on DM and self-care practices. The data collecting tool used comprised closed ended questions and this could have limited the respondents from giving more required information.

Thanks to my fellow students for their guidance and support, without which, I would have not succeeded with this study. Also thanks to my family, for supporting me to undertake studies for Master of Science in Clinical Nursing at the School of Nursing Sciences.

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Simuyemba, C.J., Patricia, P.K.-M., Chitundu, K. and Kanyanta, M.M. (2023) Diabetic Patients in Mbala, Northern Province, Zambia. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 11, 136-146. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2023.113014