<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2023.143012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-123714</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Comparison of Chronic Wound Inpatients and Outpatients’ Diets and Meals Nutrient Content in Taabo Wound Management Unit, C&#244;te d’Ivoire
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Didier</surname><given-names>Y. Koffi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amoin</surname><given-names>Georgette Konan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>Ehouman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bassirou</surname><given-names>Bonfoh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Programme National de Lutte Contre l’Ulcère de Buruli (PNLUB), Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire (CSRS), Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Université Nangui Abrogoua (UNA), UFR Sciences de la Nature, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Unité de Formation et de Recherche en Biosciences, Université Félix Houphou&amp;amp;#235;t-Boigny (UFHB), Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>156</fpage><lpage>174</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Chronic and potential non-healing wounds 
  are
   a great challenge for patients, physicians, and wound care professionals and the health system. A balanced nutrition intake is essential for health as well as a speedy recovery of such wounds. The study objective was to compare chronic wound inpatients supplemented with food nutrient content with outpatients with their usual intake in a cross-sectional study. Patients’ food samples were taken for chemical analyses. The protein, beta-carotene, 
  s
  odium, magnesium, manganese, and potassium content prove statistically significant differences. Outpatients
  ’ 
  diets are more diversified than inpatients’ diets, and supplementation diet richest in beta-carotene and in protein. Outpatients have better dietary diversity than those who were hospitalized. The result provides insights of supplementary food as critical issues pertaining to chronic wounds management. However, analyzing bioavailability of nutrient on patients’ blood may provide more knowledge in the appropriate integrated wound management.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Chronic Wound</kwd><kwd> Biochemistry</kwd><kwd> Nutrient Content</kwd><kwd> Wound Management</kwd><kwd> C&amp;#244; te d’Ivoire</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Chronic non-healing wounds tender a great challenge to patients, physicians, and wound care professionals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref1">1</xref>] . In view of the increasing prevalence of chronic wounds due to traumatism, diabetic foot, venous, pressure ulcers, and tropical neglected diseases, their appropriate management requires significant attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref2">2</xref>] . Along with the basic techniques of medical, surgical treatments, and dressing; an ideal nutrition intake is essential for a speedy recovery and rapid healing of such wounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>In low- and middle-income countries, nutritional problems are common in poor people whose diets are primarily based on starchy foods and plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref4">4</xref>] . Nutrition is a critical factor in modulating immune homeostasis and thereby the outcome of host microbe interactions. Micronutrient deficiencies produce a wide spectrum of effects ranging from clinical disorders due to severe deficiency to subtle functional impairment in subclinical deficiencies which could, nevertheless, significantly influence the health and survival of the population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref5">5</xref>] . It is now well established that besides protein and energy malnutrition, deficiencies of several micronutrients downregulate immune responsiveness and increase morbidity and mortality due to infections particularly, among children residing in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref5">5</xref>] . As a confounding factor, poor nutritional status of patients due to chronic malnutrition complicates and prolongs healing times of any ulceration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref6">6</xref>] . The underlying mechanism is that patients with poor diet cannot fulfil the increased protein requirements for metabolic fuel, adding to the impaired hormonal and cellular immunity triggered by the wound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref7">7</xref>] . This causes a double burden, further compromising wound healing of the patient [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Nutrition seems to be is one of the most basic of medical issues and is often ignored as a problem in the management of our chronic wound patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref9">9</xref>] . Unfortunately, malnutrition is widespread in our chronic wound patients in low- and middle-income countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref10">10</xref>] . This malnutrition stems from poor diet quality dominated by energy foods, with a low intake of protein and fruits and vegetable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref11">11</xref>] . The other reason why this particular attention to nutritional composition takes on its importance is the food prohibitions suffered by patients suffering from chronic wounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref12">12</xref>] . Patients are therefore left with a diet devoid of several essential foods to compensate for their nutritional deficits, but also to provide them with the adequate nutrients for the rapid healing of ulceration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref13">13</xref>] . In this context, it is therefore quite advisable to look at the nutritional composition of the diet of patients with chronic wounds throughout treatment. This article compares the nutritional composition of the diet of chronic wound inpatients and outpatients treated both in hospital intended to fill nutrients gaps and promote more accelerated healing. This paper provides key insights into food nutritional composition of chronic wound patient diet in Taabo, and critical issues pertaining to chronic wounds and their management. It also summarizes the challenges faced for chronic wound treatment and specified factors responsible for delayed healing.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>Food nutrient content of chronic wounds patients’ diet were evaluated in a cross-sectional study within the framework of a wound management study carried out from May 2019 to March 2021 in Ahondo health center and in the Buruli ulcer unit in Taabo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref14">14</xref>] . Ahondo and Taabo are, in the health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS), composed of a small town, 13 villages, and over 100 hamlets. At the end of 2020, the total population was 49,000 inhabitants living in 6707 households. The Taabo department is characterized by crop production, which is the main socio-professional activity, and secondarily livestock activities. Most of the inhabitants are illiterate (72%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref15">15</xref>] . The population is young, as seen in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and 45.5% are children under 15 years old [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref15">15</xref>] . Patients Food was collected and analyzed all along the treatment. This analysis concerned both the food consumed by the patients at home as well as the food consumed in the hospital for those who were hospitalized. In addition to that, the food analysis also considered soy-enriched dishes and orange-fleshed sweet potato dishes. This supplementary food was supposed to improve patient nutritional status and enhance wound healing rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Dietary Assessment</title><p>A survey on eating habits was conducted through food frequency questionnaire. Then, to monitor diet during treatment, a 24 h Recall proxy method was done at baseline and then on non-consecutive days separated by at least 2 weeks during the visit to the health center or during dressings for patients hospitalized in hospital [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref16">16</xref>] . We asked patients to recall all food eaten and beverages taken in the previous twenty-four hours prior to the interview.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Dietary Diversity and Selected Nutrient</title><p>The individual dietary diversity score was calculated according to FAO guides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref17">17</xref>] . This score corresponds to the number of food groups consumed the day before the survey. Next, the state of dietary diversity was determined according to the following two indicators: 1) minimum dietary diversification: corresponding to the proportion of participants who consumed at least 5 out of 10 food groups.; 2) the level of dietary diversification, which consisted of grouping the diversity scores of the different targets into three classes: low, medium, and high, and then calculating the proportions of individuals in each class. The different classes have been defined as follows 1) low dietary diversity score: 0 to 4 food groups consumed; 2) medium dietary diversity score: 5 food groups consumed; 3) high dietary diversity score: 6 to 10 food groups consumed.</p><p>The following 8 nutrients were selected: lipids, proteins, carbohydrate, total sugars and reducing sugars, crude fiber, and mineral content of the different dishes, plus energy.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Biochemical Analysis</title><p>Food samples from the patients’ normal diet and from supplementary food were taken and then stored at minus 20˚C. Then, the collected samples were freeze-dried to be subjected to the various analyses.</p><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Fat Content</title><p>The determination of the lipid content was carried out by the Soxhlet extraction method according to the AOAC standard (2000). Equation (1) is Fat content determination. It was calculated as a percentage of fat per gram per 100 grams of dry matter according to the formula:</p><p>100   gramsofdrymatter = ( balloonmass + fatmatter ) − massofemptyballoon masseballon + test &#215; 100 (1)</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Crude Protein Content</title><p>Crude protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl method (AOAC, 2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref18">18</xref>]</p><p>Totalprotein ( g / 100   g ) = ( V 1 − V 0 ) &#215; 14 &#215; 6.25 10 &#215; me (2)</p><p>“Equation (2) is protein crude determination.</p><p>V0: volume (mL) of sulfuric acid solution (0, 1, N) used for blank testing.</p><p>V1: volume (mL) of sulfuric acid solution (0, 1, N) used for the test (sample).</p><p>Me: mass (g) of the powder sample.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Fiber Content</title><p>Fiber levels were determined using the AOAC (2000) method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>grossfibre = m1 − m2 me &#215; 100 (3)</p><p>“Equation (3) is:</p><p>me: mass (g) of the sample taken.</p><p>m1: mass (g) of the residue obtained after filtration and drying.</p><p>m2: mass (g) of ash from incineration.</p><p>MS: Dry Matter.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_4"><title>2.4.4. Total Carbohydrate Content</title><p>The total carbohydrate (GT) content, expressed in grams per 100 grams of sample, is given by Equation (4)</p><p>Total carbohydrate % = 100 − (Humidity % + Protein % + Lipids % + Ashes %) (4)</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_5"><title>2.4.5. Energy Value Determination</title><p>The energy value of food was obtained by multiplying the content of each macronutrient by the corresponding ATWATER index (AFNOR, 1989) defined as the metabolizable energy in kilocalories of 1 g of nutrient, whose correspondences are as follows:</p><p>1 g of protein provides 4 kcal.</p><p>1 g of carbohydrates provides 4 kcal.</p><p>1 g of fat provides 9 kcal.</p><p>The overall energy value of a food is obtained from Equation (5) which is the sum of the metabolizable energies of the carbohydrate, lipid, and protein components</p><p>EV = (Protein &#215; 4) + (Carbohydrates &#215; 4) + (Fat &#215; 9) (5)</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_6"><title>2.4.6. Carbohydrate Extraction and Dosing Principle</title><p>It consisted of the extraction of free sugars from plant sources by ethanol and then the quantitative determination of reducing sugars by the dinitro salicylic acid (DNA) method and total sugars by the phenol-sulphuric method.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_7"><title>2.4.7. Reducing Sugar Content</title><p>1. The content of reducing sugars was obtained by the Bernfeld method (1955) using 3,5-dinitrosalycilic acid (DNS) after extraction with 80% ethanol. The concentration of reducing sugars was determined using a calibration line DO = f [Concentration of reducing sugars], based on a range of (standard) glucose solutions. The content (T) of reducing sugars (g/100g DM) was calculated as in the case of total sugars.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_8"><title>2.4.8. Total Sugar Content</title><p>The total sugar content was determined by the method of Dubois et al. (1956) after extraction in 80% ethanol. For this purpose, the extract was treated with phenol (5%, w/v) and concentrated sulfuric acid to determine the concentration of total sugars using a calibration line DO = f [Total sugar concentration], constructed from a range of sucrose solutions (standard). The total sugar content (T) (g/100g DM) was calculated using the “Equation (6):</p><p>T = 50 ∗ c ∗ d ∗ 100 ∗ 0.001 p ( g ) = 5 ∗ c ∗ d p ( g ) (6)</p><p>With:</p><p>d = dilution (if necessary).</p><p>C = sugar concentration in the sample.</p><p>P = mass of the sample.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_9"><title>2.4.9. Determination of Minerals</title><p>The minerals were analyzed by the X-ray fluorescence method using a MESA-50 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. The principle of this method is based on the analysis of the radiation that will emit a sample that has been excited by X-rays. The detection limit of this X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (SFX) is 0.00002 ppm.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The data entered in Kobo collect was transferred and processed with Microsoft Excel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref20">20</xref>] to check for missing values. The final database was exported to in the R data analysis software to be analyzed and visualized with the basic function “glm” and the package “lmtest” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref21">21</xref>] . Multiple match analysis (MCA) was performed to summarize the data and allow multiple categorical variables to be visualized in a single dimension (the Kruskal-Wallis’s test was performed for more than two groups and the significance level was set at P &lt; 0.05) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Of the 68 patients enrolled in the study, 40 were inpatients and 28 were treated as outpatients. For supplementation, 49 received complementary food composed of orange flesh sweet potatoes frites and soy-enriched dishes. The remaining 19 patients did not receive the supplementary foods but continue with their normal diet.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Food Groups Consumption</title><p>Of the outpatients enrolled in the study, the majority adhere to the three main daily meals; 76% eat breakfast every day, 69% eat lunch and 79% eat dinner. For intermediate meals such as snacks, barely a third of patients take the time to observe it, 29% of them have a snack at 10 a.m. A small proportion (4.4%) of patients eat an extra meal the night after dinner. As for the foods consumed, they are mainly dominated for the main meals of vegetables for sauces, protein dominated by fish and cereals mainly rice and wheat for bread. Breakfast is most often left over from the day before or bread accompanied by hot milk. Then come starchy foods dominated by tubers and plantain. Fruit is almost not eaten, as less than 10% consume it (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>).</p><p>For inpatients, their habits are modelled on food they could get. Most of them adhere to the three main meals of the day: breakfast, lunch and dinner, at 81%, 71% and 81% respectively. Barely a quarter of them take the snack. However, no inpatients eat meals at night after dinner. The main foods consumed by inpatients at their main meals are dominated by cereals, mainly rice and wheat, by vegetables for sauces, and proteins largely from fish. Then there are starchy</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of outpatients by food group consumption</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Food groups</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Meals</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breakfast</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lunch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Night</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-consumed (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consumed (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt, sugar and salty and sweet products (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meat, fish, eggs, and legumes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Milk and diary (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starchy foods and derivatives (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fruits and vegetables (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drink (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>foods, mainly tubers and plantain. Just like outpatients, almost none of them eat fruit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Dietary Diversity</title><p>From these results it clear that outpatients have a better food diversity score than inpatients, 61% of outpatients have a higher dietary diversity score (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref>) while inpatients have 67% with lower dietary diversity score (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Nutritional Properties of Dishes</title><p>The results of the biochemical analysis of these dishes are reported in  <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> for outpatients and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>II for inpatients.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of inpatients consumption of food groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Food groups</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Meals</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breakfast</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lunch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Night</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-consumed (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consumed (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt, sugar and salty and sweet products (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meat, fish, eggs, and legumes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Milk and diary (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starchy foods and derivatives (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fruits and vegetables (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drink (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref></label><caption><title> Dietary diversity score of outpatients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Food diversity score</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Distribution of outpatients</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.71</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref></label><caption><title> Dietary diversity score of inpatients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Food diversity score</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Distribution of inpatients</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Outpatients’ Diet</title><p>The diet is dominated by cereals mainly rice for 62% and starchy foods such as yam for 24% and cassava for 9.5 % and beans for 5%. Fish is the most consumed animal protein present in all outpatient dishes 94% and beef meet for 6%. There is, however, a diversity of sauces consumed ranging from eggplant sauce, okra, peanuts, to palm seed and green leaves. In terms of nutritional properties, the dishes are mostly very energetic with a value ranging from 265.9 to 482 kcal and rich in total sugar with a content ranging from 0.5 to 9.7 g/100g DM. They are moderately rich in water with a concentration of 15 - 49 g/100g DM. These dishes are low in protein, with a content ranging from 0.4 to 2.28 g/100g DM of protein. At the lipid level, the content of the dishes varies from 0.25 to 41 g/100g DM of fat. At the carbohydrate level, the dishes have a hyper-carbohydrate content with a concentration ranging from 21 to 89 g/100g DM of carbohydrates. However, these dishes are rich in crude fiber ranging from 0.85 to 7 g/100g DM of fiber (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Inpatients’ Diet</title><p>The dishes of patients in hospitalization are dominated by cereals in majority rice which is 67% of food consumed by inpatients followed by maize and cassava for 17% each. Fish remains the only animal protein consumed by hospitalized patients. The sauces are dominated by dried okra and peanuts. In terms of nutritional properties, the dishes are mostly very energetic with a value ranging from 100 to 361.58 kcal and rich in total sugar with a content ranging from 0.50 to 7.60 g/100g DM. They are moderately rich in water with a concentration of 15 - 49 mg/100g DM. These dishes are low in protein, with a content ranging from 0.7 to 2.2 mg/100g DM of protein. At the lipid level, the content of the dishes varies from 0.07 to 0.21 g/100g DM of fat. At the carbohydrate level, the dishes have a hyper-carbohydrate content with a concentration of up to 71.5 g/100g DM of carbohydrates. However, these dishes are rich in crude fiber ranging from 0.8 to 4.7 mg/100g DM of fiber (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Supplementation Dishes</title><p>A sample of the supplementation foods was also taken for biochemical analysis. These are 10 samples of orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) fries and 10 samples of soy corn toh (corn paste). The results of chemical analyses of supplementary foods are recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>7. OFSP fries total sugars content was 9.9 g/100g DM compared to 3.6 g/100g DM for soybean toh with corn. OFSP fries are rich in water with a concentration of 52 mg/100g DM. At the macronutrient level, protein content ranging from 0.78 mg/100g DM for toh enriched with soy and 0.08 mg/100g DM for OFSP fries. At the lipid level, the fat content range from 22 mg/100g DM for OFSP fries and 2 mg/100g DM for soy toh. At the carbohydrate level, soy enriched corn toh has 75 mg/100g DM of carbohydrates and 30 mg/100g DM of carbohydrate for OFSP fries. The crude fiber with a concentration of about 5 mg/100g DM fiber was similar in the two dishes. The determination of total minerals in the different dishes including supplementation dishes consumed by patients suffering from chronic wounds allowed an analysis of the composition of the dishes in phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), molybdenum (Mo), magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>8 and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>9).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5</label><caption><title> Energy value and nutrients content of the dishes consumed by the outpatients treated in the study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Meals</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Energy and nutrients</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy value kcal/100 g DM<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Humidity g/100g FM<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Protein g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat (g/100g DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digestive carbohydrate g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reducing sugars g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total sugars g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fibres g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ashes g/100g DM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White-rice-dry okra-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >341.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice-beans and meat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pounded yam-dry okra sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >482.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pounded yam-eggplant sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >309.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White-rice-peanuts sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >354.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placali-palm seed dry okra sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >334.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boiled yam-oil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White Rice-okra-eggplant sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White-rice-peanuts sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >463.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White-rice-eggplant sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White-rice-palm seed dry okra sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White Rice-okra-eggplant sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >333.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice-leaves-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >367.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atti&#233;k&#233;-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >331.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boiled yam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pounded yam-okra sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White Rice-leaves-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White Rice-eggplant-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White Rice-dry okra-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.165</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White Rice-leaves-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a: DM (dried matter); b: FM (Fresh matter).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6</label><caption><title> Nutrients content of the dishes consumed by inpatients in the study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Meals</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Energy and nutrients</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy value kcal/100 g DM<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Humidity g/100g FM<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Protein g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat (g/100g DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digestive carbohydrate g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reducing sugars g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total sugars g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fibres g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ashes g/100g DM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White-rice-dry okra-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize toh-dry okra-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atti&#233;k&#233;-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fried rice-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice-leaves-sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice-peanuts sauce-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >326.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a: DM (dried matter); b: FM (Fresh matter).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>7</label><caption><title> Biochemical composition of supplementation dishes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Meals</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Energy and nutrients</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy value kcal/100g DM<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Humidity g/100g FM<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Protein g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat (g/100g DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digestive carbohydrate g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reducing sugars g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total sugars g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fibres g/100g DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ashes g/100g DM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OFSP Fries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soy enriched toh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basic diet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.45</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a: DM (dried matter); b: FM (Fresh matter).</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>8</label><caption><title> Mineral content of inpatients’ diet meals</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Meals</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Mineral (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice fish dried okra-sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kabato-fish dried okra sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atti&#233;k&#233;-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice fish Namoukoun-sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OFSP fries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In terms of phosphorus, rice accompanied by beans and beef has the highest content found in outpatients’ diet, followed by orange-fleshed sweet potato fries accompanied by fried tomato with fish and pounded yam with okra sauce with fish in outpatients’ diet. In terms of potassium, it is the pounded yam with fish dried okra sauce in outpatients’ diet, then the sweet potato fries with orange</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>9</label><caption><title> Mineral content of outpatients’ diet meals</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Meals</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Mineral (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bean meat rice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pounded yam-fish dried okra-sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pounded yam-fish eggplant sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice fish peanuts sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placali-fish dried okra palm sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice-fish gouagouassou sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice-fish eggplant sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice fish Namoukoun-sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atti&#233;k&#233;-fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pounded yam-fish okra sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice fish sweet potatoes leaves sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice-fish eggplant sauce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.37</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>flesh accompanied by the fried tomato with fish that stand out in terms of the highest content. In terms of calcium, the highest content is found in the fries of sweet potato with orange flesh accompanied by the frying of tomato with fish, then the pounded yam with okra sauce with fish found in outpatients’ diet. In terms of iron, sweet potato fries with orange flesh accompanied by the frying of tomato with fish, Kabato enriched with soy, pounded yam with fish dried okra sauce and rice accompanied by beans and beef have the highest content, both in outpatients’ diet. For of zinc, sweet potato fries with orange flesh accompanied by the frying of tomato with fish have by far the highest content. For magnesium, kabato with dried okra sauce in inpatients’ diet and fish atti&#233;k&#233; (a cassava couscous) have the highest content. Placali (a fermented cassava paste) with palm sauce and fish atti&#233;k&#233; have the highest sodium content. It found in outpatients’ diet (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>9).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Comparison of Outpatient and Inpatient Supplemented Diet</title><p>Outpatients have better dietary diversity than those who were hospitalized. The protein content shows statistically significant differences (P &lt; 0.05) between the different dishes. The soy-enriched corn toh being the richest in protein with a concentration of 0.79 g/100g DM of dishes followed by inpatients’ diet with a concentration of 0.56%. OFSP fries are low in protein with a concentration of 0.087%. The total fat, ash and water content of the different meals show no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05), (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>7). There is no significant difference in the digestible carbohydrate content of the different foods consumed by the patients (P &gt; 0.005) even if outpatients’ diet has the highest content.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Comparison of the Mineral Composition of Different Dishes</title><p>At significance level P &lt; 0.05, comparison of the mineral content of different dishes according to Kruskal-Wallis’s test, revealed that no significant differences exist between the dishes for Iron, Zinc, Phosphorus, Calcium, and molybdenum. On the other hand, the dishes differ for the minerals K, Mn, Mg and Na. Thus, for Kruskal-Wallis’s test P &lt; 0.05, there is a significant difference between dishes for mineral K. Analysis confirms that at least one of the average rank values of the rice with dry okra sauce and fish in the outpatients’ diet is different from the others, P-value = 0.03145 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). For the mineral Mn, test confirms that at least one of the average rank values of the Rice with Bombacaceae dried leaves sauce in inpatients diet is different from the others, P-value = 0.02294, (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). For the</p><p>mineral Mg, The Kruskal-Wallis’s test confirms that at least one of the average rank values for OFSP frites is different from the others, P-value = 0.03645 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). For the mineral Na, the average rank values of the Attieke and fish in outpatients’ diet is different from the others, P-value = 0.04103 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Chronic wound outpatient food nutrient content compared to chronic wound inpatients food nutrient content during treatment illustrate significant protein and beta-carotene differences of content between the different dishes and no significant difference in the digestible carbohydrate content of the different foods consumed by patients. The study also highlighted the higher dietary diversity score of chronic wound outpatients compare to chronic wound inpatients.</p><p>About food-group consumed and food contributing to the nutrients, 6 groups and 14 foods were collected from patients’ diet. Almost all the foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref11">11</xref>] belong to 2 food-groups compose of meat, fish, eggs, and legumes and starchy foods and derivatives. That denote an unbalanced diet based on 2 food-groups relied on 2 foods (rice and fish) which are highly consumed by patients, with insufficient fruits consumption and low protein diversification. This finding is confirmed by Bonfoh et al., 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref23">23</xref>] who highlight that in C&#244;te d’Ivoire, specifically in Taabo’s context, the diet is unbalanced and the whole family consumes the same meal made mainly with high-energy staples and little protein. Dind&#233; et al., 2017 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref24">24</xref>] emphasized this finding by explaining that in rural C&#244;te d’Ivoire the local food system is not diversified enough and dominated by high-energy diets and protein deficiency in their diet. This unbalanced diet is more pronounced for inpatients. Due to hospitalization, they do not have access to a large range of food, so they consume the same group of food continually. Compared to outpatients who have access to a large range of food, this could explain the great difference between the two groups of patients about dietary diversity.</p><p>This unbalanced diet could be link to the local food system as urged by Dind&#233; but may also be link to the cultural factors, food restrictions and taboos supported by Konan et al., 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref25">25</xref>] who said that the eating habits of patients with chronic wounds are often governed by deeply rooted socio-cultural food restrictions. These dietary prohibitions are imposed on most patients who use traditional medicine. Traditional therapists believe that eating certain foods could aggravate the disease and promote necrosis on the surface of the ulceration. In fact, these foods are suspected to be detrimental to the health of the patients and are presented as treatment-related measures to be observed in the quest for healing as confirm by Adjet et al., 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>The basic diet nutrients contents for out and inpatients were similar because families of inpatients were usually responsible for assuring food for patients, District Hospital could not support patient feeding as confirmed by Koffi et al., 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref8">8</xref>] . Therefore, in and outpatient diet nutrient content were mostly very energetic; hyper-carbohydrate; rich in total sugar content, but low in protein, because diet was dominated by cereals mainly rice and starchy foods such as yam and cassava. Only fish was animal-protein mainly consumed, present in all dishes. Poor consumption of vegetable protein like soy and beans although available in the context of Taabo. This situation, therefore, raises the problem of nutrition education mention by Bonfoh et al.; 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref23">23</xref>] arguing that lack of nutritional education has a considerable impact on people’s eating habits.</p><p>Regarding the mineral content of the dishes, the levels found are low for all major minerals for an adequate and sufficient intake of trace elements and micronutrients essential for a nutritional balance. This is mentioned by Trumbo et al. 2001 which give the references of consumption of the different minerals in the diet according to the World Health Organization and the Fund for Food and Agriculture. These results corroborate the micronutrient deficiencies and nutritional deficiencies found in the Ivorian patients as supported by Koffi et al. 2019a. This micronutrient deficiency is the basis of skin manifestation as supported by the writings of Doka et al. 2021. Insufficient intake of Fe, and Zn causes fatigue, poor growth, anemia, rickets, and impaired cognitive performance in humans as emphasized by Murphy et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>Indeed, the iron content of all the samples studied ranged from 0.14 ppm to 0.24 ppm, lower than 8.7 ppm of the RDI (mg/day) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref27">27</xref>] . Iron is an important trace element in the human body, it plays a crucial role in hematopoiesis, infection control and cell-mediated immunity as mentioned Cayot; 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref28">28</xref>] . Iron deficiency has been described as the most common nutritional deficiency and estimates that iron deficiency anemia affects more than one billion people worldwide according to the WHO, 2022. The consequences of iron deficiency for a wound include anemia, decreased resistance to infection as describe by Swanson et al. 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref27">27</xref>] and delayed healing. The level of Zn ranged from 0.02 ppm to 0.06 ppm in all food samples was also very low than 9.5 ppm recommended daily as mentioned by Severo et al.; 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref29">29</xref>] . Zinc is a micronutrient essential for human growth and immune functions argued Benallal et al., 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref30">30</xref>] . Zinc deficiency is thought to be responsible for poor wound healing (Medicine 2003). As for magnesium the content ranged from 9.19 ppm to 18.6 ppm was lower than 300 ppm recommended daily as confirm Yu et al. 2020 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref31">31</xref>] , its deficiency contributes to the aging of the skin, which can lead to a skin healing disorder, as supported by Colboc and Meaume 2018 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref32">32</xref>] . As for calcium, it is essential for the vascular phase of healing leading to hemostasis, coagulation and fibrosis as mentioned by D&#233;marchez 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref33">33</xref>] , calcium deficiency can be the cause of hemorrhage. In our study regarding the total minerals, the daily intake of calcium ranged from 1.38 ppm to 5.83 ppm very low compared to the daily recommended dose range from 1000 ppm to 1300 ppm as describe by Cormick et al. 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref34">34</xref>] .</p><p>Compare to the supplemented food given to patients to improve nutritional status and wound healing; the analysis found the soy-enriched corn toh being the richest in protein addition to it hyper-carbohydrate content than the basic diet. This high content of protein could come from soy, one the most vegetable protein content which could easily compensate the lack of protein in patients’ diet as confirmed by Zhang et al., 2021 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref35">35</xref>] . About Orange flesh sweet potatoes, the analysis outlines it high beta-carotene content addition to it hyper-carbohydrate and total sugar content that makes it ideal in the context of wound healing as confirmed by Alam et al., 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>Comparing the diet content one to another regarding the need for wound healing as mentioned by Collins et al., 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref37">37</xref>] who said that adequate protein intake is essential to the successful wound healing, in that view soy enriched dishes could be an appropriate option for wound treatment because of its high protein content. Concerning OFSP its beta-carotene content makes it an ideal food for wound healing. This argument is also supported by Van Buren et al., 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123714-ref38">38</xref>] , who stated that vitamin A deserves special mention regarding its effect on wound healing.</p><p>Study limitations</p><p>These investigations underline the high value of supplemented food nutrient content on basic diet focusing on protein, carbohydrate, lipid, sugar, and beta-carotene content, however, disregards mineral and vitamin content of dishes. This approach fails to analyze patients’ blood exam researching albumin, vitamin A, iron and other micronutrients involves in wound healing which could strengthen the finding.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Nutrition fit to provide nutrient adapted to cover chronic wound patients’ nutritional deficiency integrated into WHO-recommended wound management in West Africa could be the solution to chronic wound management in LMIC countries. Nutrition education focusing on dietary diversity and balanced diet for appropriate nutritional intake should be part of the recommendation to be given to chronic wound’ patients and care givers. Moreover, our findings also indicate that nutrition with high value nutrient content regarding protein, calories and beta-carotene could be include in chronic wound protocol to improve patient nutritional status and enhance wound healing rate. This needs to be validated with a larger study, however, further study should involve analyzing bioavailability of nutrient on patients’ blood may strengthen appropriate management.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>We thank the national Buruli ulcer control program, all the patients and their caregivers in the case of minors, for their collaboration, the communities’ health workers, and the nurses’ assistants Ms. Compaor&#233; Zonabou and Mr. Ack&#233; Obrou Fran&#231;ois (In memoriam) from Ahondo health post and the Taabo Buruli ulcer unit. Many thanks to the Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en C&#244;te d’Ivoire and Afrique One ASPIRE for logistical and managerial support.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Financial Support</title><p>The research was conducted in the framework of the Else Kr&#246;ner-Fresenius-Foundation project “Treat early and broad: thermotherapy of Buruli ulcer integrated into WHO-recommended wound management in West Africa” and received a financial support from the DELTAS-Africa initiative [Afrique One-ASPIRE/DEL-15-008].</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Koffi, D.Y., Konan, A.G., Ehouman, E. and Bonfoh, B. (2023) Comparison of Chronic Wound Inpatients and Outpatients’ Diets and Meals Nutrient Content in Taabo Wound Management Unit, C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 14, 156-174. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2023.143012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.123714-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arif, M.M., Khan, S.M., Gull, N., Tabish, T.A., Zia, S., Khan, U.R., et al. (2021) Polymer-Based Biomaterials for Chronic Wound Management: Promises and Challenges. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 598, Article ID: 120270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macdonald, J.M., Geyer, M.J. and World Health Organization (2010) Wound and Lymphoedema Management. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44279</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vuolo, J.C. (2006) Assessment and Management of Surgical Wounds in Clinical Practice. Nursing Standard, 20, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2006.09.20.52.46.c4494</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adesogan, A.T., Havelaar, A.H., McKune, S.L., Eilitt&amp;#228;, M. and Dahl, G.E. (2020) Animal Source Foods: Sustainability Problem or Malnutrition and Sustainability Solution? Perspective Matters. Global Food Security, 25, Article ID: 100325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhaskaram, P. (2001) Immunobiology of Mild Micronutrient Deficiencies. British Journal of Nutrition, 85, S75-S80. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2000297</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, S. and Dipietro, L.A. (2010) Factors Affecting Wound Healing. Journal of Dental Research, 89, 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509359125</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, L. (2002) Assessing Patients’ Nutritional Needs in the Wound-Healing Process. Journal of Wound Care, 11, 225-228. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2002.11.6.26406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koffi, D.Y. (2017) Approche nutritionnelle dans la prise en charge de l’ulcère de Buruli: Les expériences du centre de sante saint-michel de Zoukougbeu et de l’h&amp;#244;pital général de Djekanou en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. 60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Molnar, J.A., Vlad, L.G. and Gumus, T. (2016) Nutrition and Chronic Wounds: Improving Clinical Outcomes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 138, 71S-81S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002676</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lazzerini, M., Rubert, L. and Pani, P. (2013) Specially Formulated Foods for Treating Children with Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 6, Article No. CD009584. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009584.pub2/full  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009584.pub2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Swinburn, B., Hovmand, P., Waterlander, W. and Allender, S. (2022) The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change. In: Kopelman, P.G., et al., Eds., Clinical Obesity in Adults and Children, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, 409-427. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119695257.ch31 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119695257.ch31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adjet, A.A., Kouame, D. and Fokou, G. (2016) Phytothérapie et lutte contre l’ulcère de Buruli dans le district sanitaire de Yamoussoukro (Cote d’Ivoire): Identification, description, fonction symbolique des plantes et recettes utilisées. Médecine et Santé Tropicales, 26, 408-413. https://doi.org/10.1684/mst.2016.0630</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, B. (2005) Nutrition and Wound Healing: The Necessity of Assessment. British Journal of Nursing, 14, S30-S38. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2005.14.Sup5.19955</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koffi, D.Y., Konan, G., Bassirou, B., Kone, B., Kreppel, K., Utzinger, J., et al. (2022) Accelerating Chronic Wound Healing with Food Supplements: Nutritional Analysis in the Taabo Health and Demographic Surveillance System, C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Wound Care, in Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koné, S., Baikoro, N., N’Guessan, Y., Jaeger, F.N., Silué, K.D., Fürst, T., et al. (2015) Health &amp; Demographic Surveillance System Profile: The Taabo Health and Demographic Surveillance System, C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Lucena Martins, C.M., Lemos, L.F.G.B.P., de Souza Filho, A.N., Bezerra, T.A., Soares, I.A.A., Mota, J.G., et al. (2021) Adherence to 24-Hour Movement Guidelines in Low-Income Brazilian Preschoolers and Associations with Demographic Correlates. American Journal of Human Biology, 33, e23519. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23519</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kennedy, P.G., Ballard, T. and Dop, M. (2011) Guidelines for Measuring Household and Individual Dietary Diversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, F., Qian, J., Liu, H., Wang, C., Wang, X., Wu, W., et al. (2022) Quantification, Identification, and Comparison of Oligopeptides on Five Tea Categories with Different Fermentation Degree by Kjeldahl Method and Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Quadrupole-Orbitrap Ultra-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Food Chemistry, 378, Article ID: 132130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mian, T.M.-A.S., Camara, F., Coulibaly, W.H. and Beugré, G.A.M. (2022) Assessment of Physicochemical, Biochemical, and Functional Properties of Mucilage Cocoa Juice during Storage at Room Temperature. Open Journal of Food and Nutrition, 1, 10-26. https://doi.org/10.31586/ojfn.2022.186</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Wilson, K. (2014) Microsoft Office 365. In: Wilson, K., Ed., Using Office 365: With Windows 8, Apress Berkeley, CA, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-6686-0_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kharrat, T., Boshnakov, G.N., McHale, I. and Baker. R. (2019) Flexible Regression Models for Count Data Based on Renewal Processes: The Countr Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 90, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v090.i13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezzrari, A, and Verme, P. (2012) A Multiple Correspondence Analysis Approach to the Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty in Morocco, 2001-2007. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6087, World Bank, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonfoh, B., Koné, B.V., Koffi, Y.D., Miyama, T., Fujimoto, Y., Foko, G., et al. (2022) Healthy Aging: Comparative Analysis of Local Perception and Diet in Two Health Districts of C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire and Japan. Frontiers in Aging, 3, Article 817371. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fragi.2022.817371  https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2022.817371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dindé, A.O., Mobio, A.J., Konan, A.G., Fokou, G., Yao, K., Esso, E.L.J.C., et al. (2017) Response to the Ebola-Related Bushmeat Consumption Ban in Rural C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Agriculture &amp; Food Security, 6, Article No. 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-017-0105-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konan, D.O., Mosi, L., Fokou, G., Dassi, C., Narh, C.A., Quaye, C., et al. (2019) Buruli Ulcer in Southern C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire: Dynamic Schemes of Perception and Interpretation of Modes of Transmission. Journal of Biosocial Science, 51, 520-533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932018000317</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murphy, S.P. and Allen, L.H. (2003) Nutritional Importance of Animal Source Foods. The Journal of Nutrition, 133, S3932-S3935. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.11.3932S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swanson, C.A. (2003) Iron Intake and Regulation: Implications for Iron Deficiency and Iron Overload. Alcohol, 30, 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-8329(03)00103-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cayot, P. (2022) Pourquoi le fer est indispensable à notre santé. The Conversation.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Severo, J.S., Morais, J.B.S., Freitas, T.E.C., de Andrade, A.L.P., Feitosa, M.M., Fontenelle, L.C., et al. (2019) The Role of Zinc in Thyroid Hormones Metabolism. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 89, 80-88. https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1024/0300-9831/a000262  https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000262</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benallal, Z., Najdi, A. and Elmlili, N. (2022) Nutrition et fonction immunitaire. Journal of Nursing and Biomedecine Sciences, 1, 13-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, J., Liu, H., He, S., Li, P., Ma, C., Ma, M., et al. (2020) Dietary Magnesium Intake and Leukocyte Telomere Attrition in Adults: The Regulatory Role of Serum Tumor Necrosis Factor α. Mediators of Inflammation, 2020, Article ID: 7610436. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7610436</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Colboc, H. and Meaume, S. (2018) Age et cicatrisation. Revue Francophone de Cicatrisation, 2, 30-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.refrac.2018.03.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Démarchez, M. (2012) Le vieillissement cutané. Biologie de la peau.http://biologiedelapeau.fr/spip.php?article65&amp;lang=fr</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cormick, G. and Belizán, J.M. (2019) Calcium Intake and Health. Nutrients, 11, Article 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, T., Dou, W., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, L., et al. (2021) The Development History and Recent Updates on Soy Protein-Based Meat Alternatives. Trends in Food Science &amp; Technology, 109, 702-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alam, M.K., Rana, Z.H. and Islam, S.N. (2016) Comparison of the Proximate Composition, Total Carotenoids and Total Polyphenol Content of Nine Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Varieties Grown in Bangladesh. Foods, 5, Article 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5030064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collins, N. and Schnitzer, A. (2013) How Dietary Protein Intake Promotes Wound Healing. Wound Care Advisor, 2, 16-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123714-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">VanBuren, C.A. and Everts, H.B. (2022) Vitamin A in Skin and Hair: An Update. Nutrients, 14, Article 2952. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5030064</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>