<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJGas</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Gastroenterology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2163-9450</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojgas.2023.133011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJGas-123626</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Prevalence and Factors Associated with Hepatic Steatosis in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome in Cameroon: Cases of 4 Reference Hospitals
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Winnie</surname><given-names>Tatiana Bekolo Nga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Martine</surname><given-names>Claude Etoa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bidjogo</surname><given-names>Gwet Marina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Servais</surname><given-names>A. F. Eloumou Bagnaka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antonin</surname><given-names>Wilson Ndjitoyap Ndam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Agnès</surname><given-names>Malongue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mathurin</surname><given-names>Kowo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Tzeuton</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dominique</surname><given-names>Noah Noah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oudou</surname><given-names>Njoya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Firmin</surname><given-names>Ankouane Andoulo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luma</surname><given-names>H. Namme</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>National Obesity Centre, Central Hospital of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Internal Medicine, Gynecologic and Pediatric Hospital of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Clinic of Capucines, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Department of Internal Medicine, Teaching Hospital of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>99</fpage><lpage>110</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and its prevalence increases with that of metabolic syndrome and its components. NAFLD is associated with complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagnosis is mainly based on liver biopsy, but there are validated non-invasive methods. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of metabolic steatopathy in patients with metabolic syndrome in Cameroon. 
  Methods: This was a cross-sectional and analytical study conducted over a 6-month period from January 1
  <sup>st</sup>, 2019, to August 31
  <sup>st</sup>, 2022. Included were patients with metabolic syndrome who had consulted in endocrinology or gastroenterology at Yaound&#233; Central Hospital, Douala General Hospital and Douala Gyneco-obstetric and Pediatric Hospital. The diagnosis of NAFLD was made on abdominal ultrasound in front of a homogeneous or heterogeneous hyperechogenic aspect of the hepatic parenchyma compared to that of the right renal cortex called “brilliant liver” and fibrosis evaluated through non-invasive scores (Fib4 and NALFD Fibrosis score). Logistic regression by a uni- and multivariate analysis made it possible to search for the associated factors. 
  Results. We included 133 patients. The female sex represented 64.7%. The mean age was 55 &#177; 9 years. The prevalence of NAFLD was 48.9%. At the evaluation of fibrosis was significant according to FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score respectively in 6.2% and 4.6% of cases. The independently associated factors were Triglyceridemia ≤ 1.5 g/l (OR = 0.33; 95% CI [0.11 - 0.95]; p = 0.04) and LDL hypercholesterolemia (OR = 2.94; 95% CI [1.07 - 8.11]; p = 0.036).
   Conclusion: NAFLD was present in almost half of patients with metabolic syndrome. We had very few patients with significant fibrosis, but it needs to be further evaluated. The associated factors are hypertriglyceridemia and LDL hypercholesterolemia.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hepatic Steatosis</kwd><kwd> Metabolic Syndrome</kwd><kwd> Prevalence</kwd><kwd> Cameroon</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Non-alcoholic or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as excessive accumulation of fat in the form of triglycerides in hepatocytes, greater than 5% in histology, apart from any context of excessive alcohol consumption, steatogenic treatment and other causes of chronic liver disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>NAFLD is the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref5">5</xref>] . Global prevalence was estimated at 32.4% in 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref6">6</xref>] . There are geographical and ethnic variations in the prevalence of NAFLD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref8">8</xref>] . In the United States, prevalence increased from 15% to 25% in the adult population between 2005 and 2010 and varied with ethnic origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref10">10</xref>] . In Asia, it is estimated at 30% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref11">11</xref>] . In France, according to data from the CONSTANCE cohort in 2020, there was a prevalence of 18.2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref12">12</xref>] . In South America, the prevalence of NAFLD was 35.7% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref7">7</xref>] . In Africa, prevalence was estimated at 13.48% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref13">13</xref>] . In Cameroon, Mawo et al. in 2020 found a prevalence of 56.1% in patients with type 2 diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref14">14</xref>] . In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, Abodo et al. found a prevalence of 23% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref15">15</xref>] . In Burkina Faso in 2021, Compaor&#233; et al. found fatty liver disease in 71.13% of patients and was associated with metabolic syndrome in 30.38% of patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref16">16</xref>] . The average age of patients is between 50 and 60 years with a clear increase in the prevalence among the older patients and there is a male predominance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>NAFLD risk factors are well identified in the literature. These include high-calorie diets, physical inactivity, genetic factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref18">18</xref>] , abdominal obesity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref23">23</xref>] and viral hepatitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>NAFLD evolves in a dysmetabolic and insulin-resistance context [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref25">25</xref>] . Insulin resistance observed during type 2 diabetes and present in cases of abdominal obesity leads to lipolysis and neoglucogenesis with release of free fatty acids, which go directly to the liver and constitute 60% of triglycerides. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial cytopathy are thought to play an essential role in the development of steatohepatitis lesions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>NAFLD encompasses a broad spectrum of liver lesions ranging from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis (NASH), which is associated with the risk of progression to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref27">27</xref>] . In France, about 220,000 patients with metabolic steatopathy have advanced pre-cirrhotic fibrosis or cirrhosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref12">12</xref>] . The diagnosis of HEPATIC steatosis and the evaluation of liver fibrosis is an important parameter in the follow-up of patients with NAFLD, to prevent the occurrence of complications. The gold standard for diagnosis of fibrosis remains liver biopsy. However, several non-invasive methods have been developed, including impulse elastometry, which is a reliable method but not always accessible in our context, and clinico-biological scores such as the FIB-4 index and the NAFLD Fibrosis Score [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref29">29</xref>] . In particular, they were used in a study conducted by Bekolo et al. in Cameroon to evaluate fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis C and metabolic syndrome with good negative predictive values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref30">30</xref>] . The diagnosis of steatosis can be made through abdominal ultrasound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><p>In the context of a steady increase in obesity and type 2 diabetes cases, sedentary lifestyles are a factor in the development of NAFLD, the purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with metabolic steatopathy in patients with metabolic syndrome.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This was a cross-sectional study from January 1<sup>st</sup>, 2019, to August 31<sup>st</sup>, 2022. It had three health facilities in the cities of Douala and Yaound&#233;, namely the General Hospitals of Douala and Yaound&#233;, and the Central Hospital of Yaound&#233;. These are first class hospitals each with specialized services (Endocrinology and Cardiology) where patients with metabolic syndrome are treated.</p><p>We included all patients over the age of 18 with metabolic syndrome, followed in endocrinology and/or cardiology, and having performed at least one abdominal ultrasound needed for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. The Metabolic Syndrome was defined according to the 2009 IDF harmonization consensus which takes into account the mandatory presence of abdominal obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or a waist circumference greater than 94 cm for men/greater than 80 cm for women); and 2 of the 4 following criteria, blood pressure greater than or equal to 130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive treatment, triglycerides greater than or equal to 1.5 g/l, HDL-cholesterol less than 0.4 g/l in humans or less than 0.5 g/l in women or specific ongoing treatment, fasting blood glucose greater than or equal to 1 g/l or ongoing diabetes treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref18">18</xref>] . Excluded patients who were those with incomplete records, those with another cause of chronic hepatopathy (viral hepatitis B and C, autoimmune hepatitis, overload disease), taking steatogenic medications or drinking risky alcohol. The incomplete records were those not having the age and sex of the patient, the results of abdominal ultrasound and some biological examinations, namely the assay of transaminases, platelet levels.</p><p>The data collected were socio-demographic data (age, sex), comorbidities (high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, sedentary lifestyle, occasional alcohol use, smoking, herbal medicine), clinical parameters (weight, height, waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose), biological data (ASAT, ALAT, lipid profile, GGT, prothrombin levels, albuminemia), ultrasound data (liver size, echostructure), evaluation of fibrosis by non-invasive methods (FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score, impulsive elastometry).</p><p>Age gathered is the age of the patient during the study period. The listed co-morbidities of high blood pressure, diabetes are those found in the medical record of each patient and whose diagnosis was made by a specialist doctor (cardiologist and endocrinologist). Regarding alcohol consumption and smoking, that's the information that’s in each patient’s file. Clinical and para-clinical data were obtained from the patient’s last visit during the study period. The NALFD diagnosis was made in front of an ultrasound image suggestive of fatty liver disease, namely hyperechogenicity of the hepatic parenchyma compared to that of the right kidney in a diffuse or asymmetrical manner. Fibrosis was evaluated by non-invasive scores of NAFLD Fibrosis Score, FIB-4, and impulsive elastometry, which were correlated with the METAVIR score. Fibrosis was considered non-significant if</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Operational Terms</title><p>&#183; NAFLD Fibrosis Score = 1.675 + 0.037 age (years) + 0.094 BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>) + 1.13 fasting glucose or diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 AST/ALT ratio 0.013 platelets (10<sup>9</sup>/L) 0.66 albumin (g/dL). Interpretation: Score &lt; −1.455: prediction of significant fibrosis absence (F0 - F2); score &gt; −1.455 and 0.675: undetermined score; score &gt; 0.675: prediction of significant fibrosis (F3 - F4).</p><p>&#183; FIB-4 = (ASAT age)/(ALAT platelets). Interpretation 1.45 (F0 - F2); &gt;4 (F3 - F4).</p><p>&#183; Impulsive elastometry: Interpretation: &lt;7 kPa = absence of fibrosis or minimal fibrosis F0 - F1, 7 - 10 kPa = Moderate fibrosis (F2), 10 - 14 kPa = severe fibrosis (F3 - F4), 14 kPa = cirrhosis.</p><p>&#183; Obesity: grade I (BMI between 30 - 35 Kg/m<sup>2</sup>), grade II (BMI between 35 - 40 Kg/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>&#183; Morbid obesity: BMI ≥ 40 Kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The data were stored on an electronic sheet designed using Epi data version 4.6 (Epi data Association, Odense, Denmark). The analyses were performed by IBM-SPSS version 26.0 software for Windows (IBM, Chicago, USA). Qualitative variables were presented as percentages, proportions, and/or frequencies. The quantitative variables were represented by their mean and median. To compare the different frequencies, we used the Chi Square test. The student test was used to compare averages. For the statistical analyses, we considered an error threshold of 5%. Mean values were expressed with their 95% confidence intervals. Property values p &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The uni- and multivariate regressions made it possible to look for the associated factors depending on whether they are protective or of exposure.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Ethical Considerations</title><p>A recruitment authorization has been obtained from the ethics committee of each of the health facilities where the study took place, to allow the collection of our data. The anonymity and confidentiality of each patient’s data was respected.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>We collected 419 records from patients with metabolic syndrome, of which 133 were included in our study, for an inclusion rate of 31.7%. The average age was 55 &#177; 9 years and the median 57 &#177; 12 year, with a minimum age of 19 and a maximum age of 85. The study population consisted of 64.7% (n = 86) female patients, a sex ratio of 0.55 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Hypertension and type 2 diabetes were found in 46.6% (62 patients) and 42.1% (56 patients) respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). There was a sedentary lifestyle in 75.3% or 100 patients and occasional alcohol use in 40.6% or 54 patients. Clinically, 57.1% had grade I obesity, 28.6% grade II obesity and 14.3% morbid obesity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Biologically, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, total hypercholesterolemia, elevated HDL-cholesterolemia, and elevated LDL-cholesterolemia were present in 51.1%, 63.9%, 55.6%, 60.2% and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> General characteristics of population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; SD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 &#177; 9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex Female Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (64.7) 47 (35.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Comorbities and lifestyle Diabetes Hypertension Sedentarity Occasional alcohol consumption</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (46.6) 62 (42.1) 100 (75.3) 54 (40.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obesity Grade I Grade II Morbid obesity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76 (57.1) 38 (28.6) 19 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Biological characteristics of population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; SD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Median &#177; IQR</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glycemia (g/l) (n = 133) &lt;1 ≥1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 (48.9) 68 (51.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Cholesterol (g/l) (n = 133) &gt;2 ≤2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 (55.6) 59 (44.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDL cholesterol (g/l) (n = 82) ≥1 &lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (51.2) 40 (48.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2 &#177; 0,8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HDL cholesterol (g/l) (n = 133) ≤0.4 &gt;0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (39.8) 80 (60.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0,2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Triglycerides (g/l) (n = 133) &gt;1.5 ≤1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 (63.9) 48 (36.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3 &#177; 0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASAT (UI/l) (n = 65) &lt;2N ≥2N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57 (87.7) 8 (12.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.3 &#177; 14.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.3 &#177; 13.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALAT (UI/l) (n = 65) &lt;2N ≥2N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (84.6) 10 (15.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.2 &#177; 11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.2 &#177; 12.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>51.2% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Hepatic cytolysis greater than twice normal was present in 7.5% and 6% of patients on ALAT and ASAT, respectively. At imaging the prevalence of fatty liver disease was 48.9% or 65 patients (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). On abdominal ultrasound, 03 patients (2.6%) had a liver with irregular liver contours. There was significant fibrosis according to FB-4, NAFLD fibrosis score and impulsive elastometry in 6.2%, 4.6% and 1.5% of patients, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Six patients performed impulsive elastometry. The independent factors associated with fatty liver disease were Triglyceridemia ≤ 1.5 g/l (OR = 0.33; 95% CI [0.11 - 0.95]; p = 0.04); and LDL hypercholesterolemia (OR = 2.94; 95% CI [1.07 - 8.11]; p = 0.036) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The profile of patients included in the study is that of a female patient over the age of 50 with obesity and is like that found in some studies in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref32">32</xref>]</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Hepatic steatosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >OR (IC &#224; 95%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes n = 65 (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No n = 68 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAFLD fibrosis score (n = 13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (0.07 - 5.15)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤1.455 (F0 - F2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;0.675 (F3 - F4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (4.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indeterminate interval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (5.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FIB-4 (n = 65)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.896</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 (0.5 - 2.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45 (No Fibrosis)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (10.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (18.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;4 (presence of fibrosis)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (6.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indeterminate interval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (30.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (32.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fibroscan (n = 6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (0.08 - 10.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;10 kPa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (4.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥10 kPa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Factors associated to hepatic steatosis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >aOR</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CI 95%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age &gt; 57 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90 - 10.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 - 2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.465</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDL cholesterol ≥ 1 g/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07 - 8.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.036</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HDL cholesterol ≤ 0.4 g/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38 - 3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Triglyceridemia &lt; 1.5 g/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 - 0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref34">34</xref>] . There is, however, a difference in age, particularly in the studies of Compaor&#233; et al. and Ntagirabiri et al., whose patients were younger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref34">34</xref>] .</p><p>A small number of patients had completed the morphological and/or biological assessments necessary for the diagnosis of metabolic liver disease. This contradicts the recommendations of learned societies that strongly advocate the diagnosis of metabolic steatosis in at-risk populations, namely diabetic patients, and those with metabolic syndrome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><p>Almost half of the patients had fatty liver disease, which confirms the important place of hepatic steatosis in patients with metabolic syndrome as found in several studies worldwide, notably in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref37">37</xref>] . the prevalence found in our study is much higher than that of Ntagirabiri et al. in Burundi or Asabamaka et al. in Nigeria which had prevalences of 37.2% and 9% respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref35">35</xref>] . This difference is explained by the patient profile included in the study, notably that of Asabamaka et al., who worked mainly in diabetic patients with a small proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome. Our prevalence is close to those of the Western series, whose up than 50% in patients with metabolic syndrome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref20">20</xref>] . Changes in eating habits, sedentary lifestyles, increased obesity, and metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes observed in countries with limited and intermediate resources strongly contribute to the increase in cases of fatty liver disease.</p><p>Hepatic fibrosis was very poorly evaluated. Although it is recommended, the evaluation of fibrosis in patients with metabolic syndrome is not a common practice in many practitioners even gastroenterologists and those despite the existence of non-invasive scores easily usable like FIB-4 or NAFLD fibrosis score. This assessment is more important because the progression to cirrhosis is much faster in case of fatty liver disease with the cancer risk known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref38">38</xref>] . The prevalence of fibrosis ranged from 6.2% to 1.5% depending on the assessment method. However, the fact that it is underestimated makes this prevalence hard to interpret. Only three patients had a liver with irregular contours on the abdominal ultrasound.</p><p>The factors significantly associated with NAFLD were abnormalities in the lipid profile, namely hypertriglyceridemia and elevated LDL cholesterol. These are the factors traditionally found to be associated with the occurrence of NAFLD in patient with metabolic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref39">39</xref>] . Dyslipidemia found in patients with metabolic syndrome especially those with obesity as is the case in our patients, results in accumulation of triglycerides in hepatocytes and contributes to changes in lipid metabolism in the liver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.123626-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>The main limitation of the study is the lack of biological and morphological data necessary for the diagnosis of NAFLD in patients with metabolic syndrome. Only one third in patients could be included in the study as having performed at least one abdominal ultrasound for the diagnosis of fatty liver disease.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Patients with metabolic syndrome are female patients in the 5<sup>th</sup> decade. The prevalence of fatty liver disease was 49.8%. Fibrosis was assessed very little despite the existence of non-invasive scores. Fibrosis when assessed was significant in 6.2% according to FIB4. The factors associated with fatty liver disease were hypertriglyceridemia and elevated LDL cholesterol.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Contribution of the Authors</title><p>Data Collection: Marina Bidjogo Gwet and Winnie Bekolo; Writing and Corrections: Winnie Bekolo; Proofreading and Corrections: Bidjogo, Gwet Marina, Ndjitoyap Antonin, Kowo Mathurin, Eloumou Baganka Servais, Noah Noah Dominique, Ankouane Andoulo Firmin, Njoya Oudou.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nga, W.T.B., Etoa, M.C., Marina, B.G., Bagnaka, S.A.F.E., Ndam, A.W.N., Malongue, A., Kowo, M., Tzeuton, C., Noah, D.N., Njoya, O., Andoulo, F.A. and Namme, L.H. (2023) Prevalence and Factors Associated with Hepatic Steatosis in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome in Cameroon: Cases of 4 Reference Hospitals. Open Journal of Gastroenterology, 13, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2023.133011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.123626-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burt, A.D., Lackner, C. and Tiniakos, D.G. (2015) Diagnosis and Assessment of NAFLD: Definitions and Histopathological Classification. Seminars in Liver Disease, 35, 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1562942</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, W.K. and Wong, V.W. (2022) Meaning of Non-Overlapping Patients between the MAFLD and NAFLD Definitions. Liver International, 42, 271-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.15142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serfaty, L. and Lemoine, M. (2008) Definition and Natural History of Metabolic Steatosis: Clinical Aspects of NAFLD, NASH and Cirrhosis. Diabetes &amp; Metabolism, 34, 634-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1262-3636(08)74597-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duseja, A. and Chalasani, N. (2013) Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Hepatology International, 7, 755-764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-013-9480-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellentani, S. and Marino, M. (2009) Epidemiology and Natural History of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Annals of Hepatology, 8, S4-S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1665-2681(19)31820-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riazi, K., Azhari, H., Charette, J.H., Underwood, F.E., King, J.A., Afshar, E.E., et al. (2022) The Prevalence and Incidence of NAFLD Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 7, 851-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00165-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le, M.H., Yeo, Y.H., Li, X., Li, J., Zou, B., Wu, Y., et al. (2022) 2019 Global NAFLD Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 20, 2809-2817. E28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Golabi, P., Paik, J., Hwang, J.P., Wang, S., Lee, H.M. and Younossi, Z.M. (2019) Prevalence and Outcomes of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) among Asian American Adults in the United States. Liver International, 39, 748-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perumpail, B.J., Khan, M.A., Yoo, E.R., Cholankeril, G., Kim, D. and Ahmed, A. (2017) Clinical Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23, 8263-8276. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8263</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, D., Kim, W., Adejumo, A.C., Cholankeril, G., Tighe, S.P., Wong, R.J., et al. (2019) Race/Ethnicity-Based Temporal Changes in Prevalence of NAFLD-Related Advanced Fibrosis in the United States, 2005-2016. Hepatology International, 13, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-018-09926-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakatsuka, T., Tateishi, R. and Koike, K. (2022) Changing Clinical Management of NAFLD in Asia. Liver International, 42, 1955-1968. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.15046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nabi, O., Lacombe, K., Boursier, J., Mathurin, P., Zins, M. and Serfaty, L. (2020) Prevalence and Risk Factors of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Advanced Fibrosis in General Population: The French Nationwide NASH-CO Study. Gastroenterology, 159, 791-793.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Younossi, Z., Anstee, Q.M., Marietti, M., Hardy, T., Henry, L., Eslam, M., et al. (2018) Global Burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, Predictions, Risk Factors and Prevention. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology, 15, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stéatose, M.L. (2020) Simple et stéatohépatite non alcoolique chez les patients camerounais diabétiques de type 2 nouvellement diagnostiqués à l’hopital central de Yaoundé. Thèse de doctorat., Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abodo, J.D.K., Danho, J., Léilatou, M., Koffi-Dago, P., Hué, A., Yao, A., Kouassi, F., N’Guessan, A. and Bathaix, F. (2022) Stéatopathie métabolique hépatique évaluée par le FibroScan&amp;reg; avec contr&amp;ocirc;le des paramètres d’atténuation (CAP) chez la personne diabétique de type 2 en C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. Médecine des Maladies Métaboliques, 16, 550-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mmm.2022.04.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Compaoré, N.I., Coulibaly, A., Koura, M., Somda, K.S., Somé, C.C., Zombré, N.M. S. and Bougouma, A. (2021) La stéatose hépatique métabolique liée à l'obésité chez l 'adulte Burkinabé. Pan African Medical Journal, 38, Article No. 266. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.38.266.22253</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fresneda, S., Abbate, M., Busquets-Cortes, C., Lopez-Gonzalez, A., Fuster-Parra, P., Bennasar-Veny, M., et al. (2022) Sex and Age Differences in the Association of Fatty Liver Index-Defined Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biology of Sex Differences, 13, Article No. 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-022-00475-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trepo, E. and Valenti, L. (2020) Update on NAFLD Genetics: From New Variants to the Clinic. Journal of Hepatology, 72, 1196-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.02.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Younossi, Z.M., Koenig, A.B., Abdelatif, D., Fazel, Y., Henry, L. and Wymer, M. (2016) Global Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-Meta-Analytic Assessment of Prevalence, Incidence, and Outcomes. Hepatology, 64, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28431</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Younossi, Z.M., Golabi, P., de Avila, L., Paik, J.M., Srishord, M., Fukui, N., et al. (2019) The Global Epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Hepatology, 71, 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yun, H., Cheng, H.Y.W., Chang, W.H., Lin, S.C., Chu, C.H., Wang, T.E., Liu, C.C. and Shih, S.C. (2013) Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Prevalence, Influence on Age and Sex, and Relationship with Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance. International Journal of Gerontology, 7, 194-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2013.03.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia-Compean, D. and Jimenez-Rodriguez, A.R. (2022) NAFLD VS MAFLD. The Evidence-Based Debate Has Come. Time to change? Annals of Hepatology, 27, Article 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2022.100765</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pafili, K. and Roden, M. (2021) Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) from Pathogenesis to Treatment Concepts in Humans. Molecular Metabolism, 50, Article 101122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tourkochristou, E., Assimakopoulos, S.F., Thomopoulos, K., Marangos, M. and Triantos, C. (2022) NAFLD and HBV Interplay—Related Mechanisms Underlying Liver Disease Progression. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, Article 965548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.965548</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, X., Yin, X., Liu, Z. and Wang, J. (2022) Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Pathogenesis and Natural Products for Prevention and Treatment. International Journal of Molecular, 23, Article 15489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415489</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rohr, L., Lemmer, P., Henning, M., Tannapfel, A., Baars, T., Manka, P., et al. (2023) Patients with NAFLD Exhibit More Advanced Fibrosis in Liver Biopsy Than Patients with Other Chronic Liver Diseases. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie, 61, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1960-4006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pais, R. and Maurel, T. (2021) Natural History of NAFLD. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10, Article 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061161</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Association for the Study of D and European Association for the Study of Obesity (2016) EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Journal of Hepatology, 64, 1388-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chalasani, N., Younossi, Z., Lavine, J.E., Diehl, A.M., Brunt, E.M., Cusi, K., et al. (2012) The Diagnosis and Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology, 142, 1592-1609. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bekolo Nga, W.T., Ndjitoyap Ndam, A.W., Kenfack, G., Nnang Olomo, A.L., Eloumou Bagnaka, S.A.F., Malongue, A., Tzeuton, C., Noah Noah, D., Namme, L.H., Njoya, O. and Ankouane Andoulo, F. (2020) évaluation de la Fibrose chez les Patients Porteurs d’une HépatiteVirale C Chronique et d’un Syndrome Métabolique: élastrométrie Impulsionnelle versus NAFLD Fibrosis Score. Health Sciences and Diseases, 21, 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yessoufou, A.G., Behanzin, J., Djihoumeto, E., Isstina, Z.A., Ahokpe, M. and Sezan, A. (2015) Aspects épidémiologiques du syndrome métabolique au sein de la population obése de la Commune Ouidah au Sud-ouest du Bénin. Antropo, 33, 111-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaba, M.L., Sinayoko, M., Touré, A., Bah, A., Sylla, D., Diakité, F., Chérif, I., Bah, A.B., Bah, A.O. and Touré, Y.I. (2016) Profil épidémiologique et clinique des patients atteints de syndrome métabolique dans un service de médecine interne à Conakry. Néphrologie &amp; Thérapeutique, 12, 408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2016.07.133</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Houti, L., Hamani-Medjaoui, I., Lardjam-Hetraf, S.A., Ouhaibi-Djellouli, H., Goumidi, L. and Mediene-Benchekor, S. (2014) épidémiologie du syndrome métabolique dans la population urbaine en Algérie. Oran, Algérie. Revue d’ épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, 62, S226-S227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2014.06.178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntagirabiri, R.C.J., Baransaka, E., Ndirahisha, E., Ndabaneze, E. and Niyongabo, T. (2014) Stéatose hépatique lors du syndrome métabolique chez l’adulte noir africain: Cas du Burundi. Journal Africain d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie, 8, 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12157-014-0553-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asabamaka, O.C., Ogbera, A.O. and Balogun, B.O. (2011) Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Metabolic Syndrome in an Urban Hospital Serving African Community. Annals of Hepatology, 10, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1665-2681(19)31559-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khammas, A.S.A., Hassan, H.A., Salih, S.Q.M., Kadir, H., Ibrahim, R.M., Nasir, N.N.M. and Mahmud, R. (2018) Prevalence and Risk Factors of Sonographically Detected non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in a Screening Centre in Klang Valley, Malaysia: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Porto Biomedical Journal, 4, e31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yki-J&amp;auml;rvinen, H. (2014) Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease as a Cause and a Consequence of Metabolic Syndrome. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 2, 901-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70032-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cioffi, C.E., Welsh, J.A., Cleeton, R.L., Caltharp, S.A., Romero, R., Wulkan, M.L., et al. (2017) Natural History of NAFLD Diagnosed in Childhood: A Single-Center Study. Children, 4, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/children4050034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Almobarak, A.O., Barakat, S., Suliman, E.A., Elmadhoun, W.M., Mohamed, N.A., Abobaker, I.O., et al. (2015) Prevalence of and Predictive Factors for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Sudanese Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Is Metabolic Syndrome the Culprit? Arab Journal of Gastroenterology, 16, 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajg.2015.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123626-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katsiki, N., Mikhailidis, P.D. and Mantzoros. C.S. (2016) Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Dyslipidemia: An Update. Metabolism, 65, 1109-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2016.05.003</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>