<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Forestry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2163-0429</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojf.2023.132011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJF-123488</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Post Debarking Response of &lt;i&gt;Prunus africana&lt;/i&gt; (Hook. F) Kalkman (&lt;i&gt;Rosaceae&lt;/i&gt;) Trees at Two Exploitation Sites in North Kivu (Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kambale</surname><given-names>Eloge Muhesi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Musubao</surname><given-names>Moïse Kapiri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Lagarde Betti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ndongo</surname><given-names>Din</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Water and Forests, Catholic University of the Graben, Butembo, Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology and Physiology of Plant Organisms, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Water and Forests, Higher Institute of Agronomic, Veterinary and Forestry Studies of Butembo, Butembo, Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>161</fpage><lpage>181</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>2,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Prunus africana
   is a species of great economic, medicinal and ecological importance. Due to its multiple uses, unsustainable exploitation methods and low regeneration capacity in tropical rainforests, this species is threatened with extinction. Present and exploited in the eastern part of DR Congo, knowledge of the dynamics of post-bark regeneration of Prunus africana remains fragmentary and poorly known. In North Kivu province, this species thrives in both afromontane forest and lowland tropical rainforest habitats. In order to contribute to the rational and sustainable exploitation of Prunus africana in this province, this paper was carried out with the objective of contributing to the knowledge of the dynamics of the regeneration of post-harvest bark of Prunus africana in two exploitation sites (low and high altitude). To achieve this objective, the inventory was conducted on 16 plots of 25 hectares each, with 8 plots per site. Dendrometric parameters (diameter at breast height (DBH), total tree height) and tree growth and regeneration parameters, i.e., stem bark thickness of the unharvested and harvested portions of the trees (bark reconstitution) were measured. A total of 716 barked stems of Prunus africana in 2016 in 25 hectares constituted the study sample. Results show that sites do not influence diameter at breast height of P. africana trees (p &gt; 0.05) or total tree height. The bark diameter of harvested trees and the bark diameter of unharvested trees varied significantly by site (p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.05). In contrast, the annual growth rate of bark differed with altitude; the highest rate was observed in trees growing at high altitude (2.97
   
  &#177;
   
  0.9 mm/yr) compared to 2.23
   
  &#177;
   
  0.74 mm/yr at low altitude. In view of these results, this study indicates that a half-rotation of 7 years could allow an effective reconstitution of the bark of Prunus africana at the second passage on the remaining side of the same stem.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dendrometric Parameters</kwd><kwd> Regeneration Capacity</kwd><kwd> Tree Reconstitution Rate</kwd><kwd> Debarking</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Prunus africana&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> DR Congo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Tropical forests, including those of the Congo Basin, are important carbon storage sinks  (Robert &amp; Saugier, 2003;   Laporte et al., 2010;   Lewis et al., 2013) . They address the crucial issue of climate balance in the world  (Lescuyer &amp; Cerutti 2013) . These forests are a source of survival because of the different ecosystem services they provide to local communities (food and medicinal plant supply, sacred places of cultural initiations and traditional rites, global climate regulation, water purification, heat island mitigation, etc.)  (Martinez et al., 2009;   Dinerstein et al., 2013;   Cuni-sanchez et al., 2016) . In the Congo Basin, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) occupies an important place in terms of forest cover. Indeed, it is the African country with the best forestry potential with its 128 million hectares of dense rainforests, which represents 54% of the national territory, 47% of the continent’s tropical forest and 6% of the world’s remaining forests. In addition, the Congolese forests contain a great biological diversity (flora and fauna) and also offer important ecosystem services to the populations as they serve as sources of food, medicine or other services  (Lescuyer &amp; Cerutti, 2013) . In addition, dense tropical rainforests abound in multiple resources of products and services that increasingly contribute to the improvement of social and economic well-being of households  (Betti &amp; Lejoly, 2010) .</p><p>Prunus africana (Hook. F.) Kalkman (Rosaceae), commonly known as Pygeum, is a species of Afromontane forests at altitudes of 900 - 3000 m  (Tassiamba et al., 2022;   Ingram et al., 2009)  and grows well on volcanic soil and in cool, high-altitude climates. Its range extends from Ivory Coast, Bioko Island, Sao Tome, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda, Republic of Congo, Cameroon, and the Democratic Republic of Congo to South Africa and Madagascar  (Betti, 2008) . In the Democratic Republic of Congo, Prunus africana has been reported in four provinces namely: the Eastern Province, Katanga, North Kivu and South Kivu  (Muhesi &amp; Mate, 2018) . Considering its range, Prunus africana populations are discontinuous and fragmented  (Kembelo, 2008) . Furthermore, the importance of P. africana lies in the medicinal virtues of its bark extracts used for the manufacture of more than 19 drugs, sold on the European and American markets and intended for the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy  (Cunningham et al., 2002) .</p><p>Traditionally, P. africana has multiple uses  (Ingram et al., 2009) . It produces lumber used to make tool handles and poles for house and fence construction, as well as firewood, especially for charcoal  (Fashing, 2004;   Stewart, 2003) . The major importance of Prunus africana is related to its bark. Indeed, the bark of the tree is used by traditional medicine in the treatment of prostate problems, traditional products derived from it are used as medicines against gastritis disorders and infusions of the bark treat inappetence, urinary and bladder disorders, chest pain, malaria, microbial infections and kidney diseases  (Betti, 2008;   Bii et al., 2010;   Jeruto et al., 2011;   Otieno &amp; Analo, 2012;   Mwitari et al., 2013;   Koros et al., 2016) . Internationally, P. africana bark extracts are used medicinally to treat benign adenoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia which is common in elderly men  (Cunningham et al., 2002;   Fashing, 2004;   Betti, &amp; Ambara, 2013;   Betti et al., 2014) .</p><p>Despite its multiple uses, the distribution of Prunus africana is very vulnerable and this variability is becoming increasingly noticeable in the face of global warming. This situation sufficiently demonstrates that in situ and ex situ conservation of this species will be a solution to global warming  (Mbatudde et al., 2011) . For several decades, timber exploitation has been the only source of income from forests. As a result, other forest resources such as non-timber forest products (NTFPs) have been of less concern to stakeholders. Currently, the importance of NTFPs in household incomes and even in the accumulation of wealth at the national level can no longer be denied. Among these NTFPs, the bark of Prunus africana ranks high and is produced in about twenty countries in sub-Saharan Africa  (ICCN, 2021) . However, Africa remains the third largest exporter of this bark after Cameroon and Kenya with an annual average of 1600 tons in the years 1995-2004  (Cunningham et al., 2002) .</p><p>In this context, the demand for Prunus africana bark as well as wood from other species is of concern to scientists, civil society actors and environmental non-governmental organizations. Several authors such as  (Muhesi &amp; Mate, 2018)  have already reported the lack of natural regeneration and low levels of recruitment of Prunus africana under a dense canopy of forests in its range. In the face of this situation marked by excessive harvesting of bark for commercial purposes, the natural population of P. africana has seriously declined and the species has found itself listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES)  (Tonye et al., 2000) . In practical terms, the listing of this species in Appendix II means that its trade is authorized but remains under control and is carried out in strict compliance with the rules of exploitation and sustainable management in force.</p><p>As such, this study on the knowledge of the dynamics of the regeneration of post-debarking of Prunus africana in North Kivu Province is essential. This paper has two specific objectives: 1) to study the regeneration dynamics of Prunus africana bark after exploitation in two sites in North Kivu and 2) to study the influence of altitude on growth parameters (tree diameter, bark diameter, tree height etc.) and regeneration of Prunus africana. The results of this study are of major importance. They will help raise awareness among stakeholders in the P. africana production chain (local actors, members of civil society, local and international non-governmental organizations, etc.) about the rational and responsible management of this species. This study will also help guide the Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Management in developing effective and dynamic strategies to manage the resource and ensure the application of prescribed harvesting techniques in the field. Ultimately, the study will contribute to the improvement of forest governance rules and the consideration of the regeneration of this endangered species in sustainable management policies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Study Area and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study was conducted at two Prunus africana harvesting sites in North Kivu Province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). A dense network of in situ measurements would constitute the most reliable set of these data; however, East Africa suffers from a shortage of rain gauges. This shortage of rain gauges is even more prevalent in mountainous regions such as the Ruwenzori Mountains, where the complex topography makes it difficult to install and maintain measuring stations  (Nakulopa et al., 2022) . Therefore, for these regions, precipitation estimates from satellites or climate model simulations are often used as alternative sources of precipitation data  (Jacobs et al., 2016;   Nakulopa et al., 2022) . That’s why these two sites are described using climate data from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) POWER database (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/). Five parameters whose monthly data cover a period from 1981 to 2021 were directly via this site: precipitation or rainfall (P), mean temperature (Tme), minimum temperature (Tmin), maximum temperature (Tmax), and relative humidity (RH).</p><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Ruwenzori-Lume Site</title><p>This site is located in the Ruwenzori Sector in Beni Territory at latitude 0.49661 North and longitude 29.45314 East. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the umbrothermal diagram for the Ruwenzori-Lume site.</p><p>Rainfall in Ruwenzori-Lume varies from 580 to 1713.9 mm per year with an average of 1085.7 &#177; 236.33 mm. The umbrothermal diagram shows the existence of four seasons, including two dry seasons (January-February and June-July) with total rainfall of less than 80 mm and two rainy seasons (March-May and August-December) with total rainfall of more than 80 mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Estimates obtained by previous work confirm the precipitation values obtained in this study. Indeed, the Ruwenzori Mountains like other regions of East Africa experience great rainfall variability, both in time and space  (Nakulopa et al., 2022) . In the Ruwenzori Mountains, the temporal variation of rainfall is characterized by a bimodal pattern with a rainy season from March to May and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Average values of climatic parameters according to the months of the year (period 1981-2021) in Ruwenzori-Lume</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Months</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tmin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tmax</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >January</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.76 &#177;44.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.36 &#177; 0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.74 &#177; 0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.80 &#177; 1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.77 &#177; 5.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >February</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.86 &#177; 32.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.21 &#177; 0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.34 &#177; 0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.12 &#177; 1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.80 &#177; 6.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >March</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.44 &#177; 60.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.99 &#177; 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.85 &#177; 0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.74 &#177; 1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.49 &#177; 5.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >April</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.05 &#177; 50.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.94 &#177; 0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.52 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.54 &#177; 1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.37 &#177; 3.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.03 &#177; 40.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.39 &#177; 0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.90 &#177; 0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.26 &#177; 1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.63 &#177; 3.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.83 &#177; 35.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.53 &#177; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.58 &#177; 1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.96 &#177; 1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.50 &#177; 4.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.02 &#177; 36.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.76 &#177; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.06 &#177; 1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.49 &#177; 1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.30 &#177; 5.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.64 &#177; 33.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.06 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.00 &#177; 0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.01 &#177; 1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.36 &#177; 4.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >September</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.17 &#177; 42.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.07 &#177; 0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.44 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.79 &#177; 1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.64 &#177; 4.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >October</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139.73 &#177; 56.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.63 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.49 &#177; 0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.10 &#177; 1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.86 &#177; 3.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >November</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.47 &#177; 52.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.21 &#177; 0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.13 &#177; 0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.70 &#177; 1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.60 &#177; 3.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >December</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.72 &#177; 41.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.61 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.63 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.02 &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.29 &#177; 5.27</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legend: P is the average monthly precipitation (mm), Tme is the average temperature, Tmin is the minimum temperature and Tmax is the maximum temperature (in ˚C) and RH is the relative air humidity (%) for the period 1981 to 2021.</p><p>another from August to November  (Jacobs et al., 2016;   Taylor et al., 2009;   Tibasiima et al., 2022) , reflecting the twice-annual passage of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ZCIT) in the region  (Garelick et al., 2022;   McGlynn et al., 2010;   Russell et al., 2009;   Taylor et al., 2009;   Xue et al., 2017) . Spatial distribution is controlled by orographic variation in mountain height  (Jacobs et al., 2016;   Nakulopa et al., 2022;   Taylor et al., 2009) . According to  Nakulopa et al. (2022) , the average annual precipitation is around 1500 mm per year. However,  Russell et al. (2009)  and  Garelick et al. (2022)  report an average annual rainfall of 2500 mm per year, with monthly rainfall ranging from 80 to 100 mm/month during the dry seasons and up to 400 mm/month during the wet seasons. Furthermore, the orographic effect results in a general increase in mean annual precipitation from the foot of the Ruwenzori Mountains to the upper mean altitude (~3000 m) of the mountains. These factors justify the average values and their deviations obtained in this study. Furthermore,  Taylor et al. (2006)  found that due to the orographic effect, the mean annual precipitation fluctuates around 1540 mm at an altitude of about 1370 m and drops to 890 mm at an altitude of about 960 m. Similarly,  Xue et al. (2017)  indicate that mean annual precipitation increases from 1150 mm at ~1250 m altitude to 2500 mm at 3290 m altitude.</p><p>The minimum temperature (Tmin) during the year varies from 12.08˚C to 18.24˚C with an average of 16.06˚C. On the other hand the maximum temperature (Tmax) varies from 26.07˚C to 35.65˚C with an average of 29.71˚C. The average annual temperature (Tme) in the Ruwenzori-Lume area varies from 20.08˚C to 25.85˚C. The temperature values of our study site are similar to those reported by other research which indicates average temperatures of 23.3˚C in March-May and 22.9˚C in August-November  (Tibasiima et al., 2022) . As a function of the months of the year, the average temperature remains relatively stable although the averages of the dry seasons are slightly higher than the averages of the wet months (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The relative humidity of the air in the Ruwenzori-Lume region varies from 44.12% to 83.79%, with an average of 71.25% &#177; 6.37%. The presence of mountains in this region explains this high relative humidity. The altitude of the area where the inventory was conducted varies from 1888 to 2286 m with an average of 2119.5 m.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Walikale-Kano Site</title><p>This site is located at low altitude in the Wanianga sector in Walikale territory between −1.42970 South latitude and 28.0742 East longitude. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the umbrothermal diagram for the Walikale-Kano site.</p><p>Unlike the Ruwenzori-Lume region, in the Walikale-Kane area, rainfall is abundant throughout the year and varies from 1271 to 3001 mm per year with an average of 2047 &#177; 426.55 mm per year. The average temperature (Tme) varies from 20˚C to 23.65˚C with an annual average of 21.66˚C. The maximum temperature (Tmax) varies between 26.44˚C and 33.76˚C with an annual average of 29.63˚C. Finally, the minimum temperature varies from 12.89˚C to 18.72˚C with an average of 16.17˚C. The seasons are not well marked compared to the Ruwenzori region. The umbrothermal diagram for the Walikale-Kano region shows a dry season (total monthly rainfall of less than 100 mm) between June and August, and two wet seasons (January-May and September-December) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The months of March-April-October-November-December have more water during the year (total monthly rainfall over 200 mm) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Due to the high rainfall, the relative humidity remains high throughout the year and varies from 67.12% to 89.31% with an average of 82.75%. The altitude of the area where the species Prunus africana is distributed in Walikale-Kano varies from 1328 to 1580 m with an average of 1450 m.</p><p>The soils of two areas are kaolisols derived from parent rock that is predominantly clay  (Eloge et al., 2022;   Mo&#239;se et al., 2022a;   Mo&#239;se et al., 2022b) . Indeed, these soils in the highlands of extreme North Kivu are essentially crystalline clayey and weakly ferralitic and probably date from the Lower Cambrian  (Achille et al., 2021) .</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Average values of climatic parameters in the Walikale-Kano region according to the months of the year (period 1981-2021)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Months</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tmin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tmax</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >January</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.48 &#177; 87.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.40 &#177; 0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.21 &#177; 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.62 &#177; 1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.83 &#177; 2.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >February</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.45 &#177; 72.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.88 &#177; 0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.26 &#177; 0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.35 &#177; 1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.64 &#177; 2.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >March</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238.08 &#177; 86.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.13 &#177; 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.61 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.63 &#177; 1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.17 &#177; 2.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >April</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.81 &#177; 81.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.94 &#177; 0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67 &#177; 0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.88 &#177; 0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.25 &#177; 1.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.41 &#177; 72.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.83 &#177; 0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.66 &#177; 0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.39 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.91 &#177; 2.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.77 &#177; 38.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.46 &#177; 0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.33 &#177; 0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.36 &#177; 0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.68 &#177; 2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.78 &#177; 27.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.45 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.88 &#177; 0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.02 &#177; 0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.70 &#177; 2.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.07 &#177; 53.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.03 &#177; 0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.59 &#177; 0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.92 &#177; 0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.59 &#177; 2.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >October</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.86 &#177; 75.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.81 &#177; 0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.31 &#177; 0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.94 &#177; 0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.50 &#177; 2.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >September</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247.48 &#177; 100.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.45 &#177; 0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.57 &#177; 0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.48 &#177; 0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.08 &#177; 1.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >November</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299.19 &#177; 110.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.27 &#177; 0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.53 &#177; 0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.37 &#177; 0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.46 &#177; 1.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >December</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >239.59 &#177; 85.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.30 &#177; 0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.41 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.29 &#177; 0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.17 &#177; 1.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legend: P is the average monthly precipitation (mm), Tme is the average temperature, Tmin is the minimum temperature and Tmax is the maximum temperature (in ˚C) and RH is the relative humidity (%) for the period 1981 to 2021.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Data Collection</title><p>The study was conducted from August 10 to 30, 2022, at two Prunus africana harvesting sites in North Kivu province. Harvesting in these two sites was done in 2016. In this paper, the method consisted first of identifying for each site, the Prunus africana stems that had been logged by debarking. This exercise was made possible and easy thanks to the support of harvesters working for PLAVUMA and KAHINDO MUVUNGA, two companies that hold CITES permits in the country. For each stem identified, the geographical coordinates (longitude, latitude and altitude) were recorded using a GARMIN GPS. The inventory was conducted on 16 plots of 25 hectares each, with 8 plots per site. During the inventory runs, dendrometric data were collected: diameter at breast height (DBP), total tree height, year of harvesting, and stem bark thickness of the unharvested and harvested portion (restorative bark). For bark thickness, a square piece of bark was taken and the thicknesses on all four sides were measured with a caliper, the diameter of the trees at breast height (DBH) was obtained with a forestry compass and a diameter tape and the total height with a SUUNTO dendrometer. The purpose of collecting bark thickness data was to assess the influence of the debarking technique adopted on trees at the two opposite quarters  (Wete et al., 2020;   Mpouam et al., 2022) .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Observed Parameters</title><p>Tree reconstitution rate (Trec), bark regeneration rate (Treg), and average annual increment of reconstituted bark (TAM) were estimated for each previously harvested tree and calculated according to the following mathematical expressions (Equations (1), (2), and (3), respectively)  (Mpouam et al., 2022;   Wete et al, 2020) :</p><p>T R e c = N r * 100 N e (1)</p><p>With Trec the tree recovery rate, Nr the number of trees recovered and Ne the total number of trees debarked.</p><p>T r e g = T A M ∗ t B T 2 (2)</p><p>With Treg the bark regeneration rate, TAM the average annual growth rate of the reconstructed bark, t the number of years elapsed after exploitation (5 years) and TB2 is the thickness of the unlogged bark.</p><p>T A M = T B 1 t (3)</p><p>In Equation (3), TAM represents the average annual bark growth rate, TB1 represents the average post-exploitation reconstructed bark, and t represents the number of years elapsed after exploitation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis</title><p>The data on growth parameters of P. africana were first subjected to the Shapiro-Wilk normality test and Bartlett’s equality of variances test. These two tests showed that the data do not follow a normal distribution and the variances between the different sites considered are not equal. Therefore, the effect of altitude on the different parameters of growth and regeneration of Prunus africana was highlighted using the Wilcoxon rank test at a significance level of 5%. Boxplots and error bars with p-values indicating the level of significance were obtained using the package ggpubr  (Kassambara, 2020) . The correlation matrix between the different parameters was obtained using the GGally package  (Schloerke et al., 2021) . All statistical analyses of the data were performed using R 4.1.2 software  (R Core Team, 2021)  under the Rstudio 1.2.5003 script editor.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Stem Density of P. africana</title><p>The results show an average density of 2.38 trees per ha in both study areas. High tree density was observed at lower elevations (Walikale-Kano) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of Altitude on Growth Parameters of Prunus africana</title><p>Sites did not influence diameter at breast height (DBH) of P. africana trees (p &gt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) or total tree height. In contrast, bark diameter of logged trees and bark diameter of unlogged trees varied significantly among sites (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). Bark diameter of harvested trees averaged 14.88 &#177; 4.53 mm at high elevation (Ruwenzori-Lume) and 11.17 &#177; 3.71 cm at low elevation (Walikale-Kano) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This trend is similar if we also consider the bark diameter of unharvested trees. On the other hand, the average DBH of the trees is high at the Walikale-Kano site (79.12 &#177; 24.39 cm) compared to an average of 76.82 &#177; 24.19 cm for the trees at the Ruwenzori-Lume site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Number of Prunus africana stems per ha</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sites</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total number of stems (DBH &gt; 30 cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Area inventoried (ha)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Density (stems/ha)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ruwenzori-Lume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Walikale-Kano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >716</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of growth parameter values for P. africana at the two study sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Ruwenzori-Lume</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Walikale-Kano</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DBH (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.82 &#177; 24.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.12 &#177; 24.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total height (m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.43 &#177; 3.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.54 &#177; 3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BT1 (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.88 &#177; 4.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.17 &#177; 3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BT2 (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2 &#177; 4.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.08 &#177; 3.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of Altitude on Tree Recovery Rate, Bark Regeneration Rate and Mean Annual Increment of Recovered Bark</title><p>The inventory data at both sites show high rates of tree regeneration. At the Ruwenzori-Lume site, 304 trees out of 311 barked trees have recovered between 2016 and 2022, i.e. a recovery rate of 97.75%. Similarly, 396 trees out of 405 debarked trees have recovered in the Walikale-Kano site, i.e. a recovery rate of 97.77%. The Wilcoxon test shows that there is no statistically significant difference between the rate of regeneration and the two sites (p &gt; 0.05). In contrast, bark regeneration rate (W = 122169, p = 2.2*10<sup>−</sup><sup>16</sup>) and average annual bark growth rate after 6 years (W = 91136, p = 2.2*10<sup>−</sup><sup>16</sup>) differed between the study sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) show the means and standard deviations of bark regeneration rate and mean annual bark growth rate.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Bark regeneration rate and average annual growth rate based on the two study sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Ruwenzori-Lume</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Walikale-Kano</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TReg (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.87 &#177; 3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.57 &#177; 11.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TAM (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97 &#177; 0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23 &#177; 0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The high variations in the mean annual growth rate of the crust expressed in terms of standard deviations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)) could be linked to strong variations in climatic conditions (precipitation) which fluctuate from one year to another at the level of two sites. These differences would then be impacted by the alternation of dry and wet seasons, especially since the physiological processes of the tree are dependent on the amount of water available.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Effect of Altitude and Diameter Classes on Post-Bark Mortality of P. africana Trees</title><p>The distribution of P. africana stems in diameter classes across sites show an inverted J-shaped curve. The number of trees decreases as the diameter increases. This is one of the characteristics of tropical forests where young and old trees are less numerous in the stands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Pearson’s chi-squared test of independence shows that tree numbers within diameter classes do not differ between the two study sites (X-squared = 2.86, df = 5, p = 0.721).</p><p>Descriptive statistics (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>) show that the percentage of mortality is higher at low altitude (Walikale-Kano) than at high altitude (Ruwenzori-Lume). However, statistically, the chi-squared test shows that the difference in mortality percentages is not significant (p = 1 &gt; 0.05). The high percentage of post-barking mortality was obtained for trees with a diameter between 90 and 120 cm. Statistically, mortality was different across diameter classes at the 5% threshold (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Correlation between Growth Parameters of P. africana at the Two Sites</title><p>This study shows that the average annual bark growth rate of P. africana is positively correlated with the bark diameter of the logged tree (r = 1) and negatively correlated with total tree height (r = −0.053). Bark regeneration rate after debarking was also positively correlated with bark diameter of harvested trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Numbers and proportions of trees alive or dead after debarking</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Modalities</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Trees mortality status</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dead trees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Living trees</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ruwenzori-Lume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (43.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >304 (43.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Walikale-Kano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (56.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396 (56.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Diameter class (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >]30 - 60]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (18.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186 (26.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.050</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >]60 - 90]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302 (43.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >]90 - 120]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (37.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176 (25.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (18.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (5.1)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Stem Density</title><p>The results show an average density of 1.79 trees per ha in the two study areas. This density is similar to the values obtained by many authors. After a five-year rotation,  Wete et al. (2020)  observed that out of a total of 170 trees harvested by both methods, of which 86 (56%) trees were harvested by the 2/4 technique and 84 trees (54%) by the 4/8 technique, tree density decreased from 1.7 to 1.28 stems/ha  (Wete et al., 2020) . In a paper that aimed to assess the potential of P. africana in the 25,671 ha Tchabal Mbabo Forest in Cameroon,  Wilfried et al. (2022)  counted three hundred and fifty-eight (358) stems of P. africana over an area of 57.5 ha, giving a density of 6.23 stems/ha. This value is higher than the average density of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Effect of Altitude on Growth Parameters</title><p>This paper showed that growth parameters (stem diameter and tree height) did not vary with altitude (P &gt; 0.05), but bark parameters were significantly different with altitude (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). In both study areas, the average diameter of harvested trees was 76.82 &#177; 24.19 cm in Ruwenzori-Lume and 79.12 &#177; 24.39 cm in Walikale-Kano. The average thickness of unharvested bark was 15.2 &#177; 4.57 mm in Ruwenzori-Lume and 13.08 &#177; 3.82 mm in Walikale-Kano. For the logged portion, the bark thickness at the Ruwenzori-Lume site is 14.88 &#177; 4.52 mm and 11.17 &#177; 3.71 mm at the Walikale-Kano site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). These results are different from those reported by  Mpouam et al. (2022)  in terms of tree diameter and similar in terms of the thickness of the unmined bark. Indeed, these authors found that the average diameter of harvested trees was 47.60 &#177; 17.65 cm, the average thickness of the unharvested bark was 15.47 &#177; 4.32 mm, and that of the portion under reconstitution was 7.30 &#177; 2.32 mm  (Mpouam et al., 2022) . In the Tchabal Mbabo forest in Cameroon, mean values for tree diameter, height, and bark thickness of stems (unharvested and harvested sides) are 48.17 &#177; 19.8 cm; 7 &#177; 4.26 m; 14.1 &#177; 4.72 mm; and 10.39 &#177; 4.22 mm, respectively  (Wilfried et al., 2022) . These values are lower than those in that study. As in this study,  Mpouam et al. (2022)  found an influence of altitude on the parameters of Prunus africana. Overall, these authors found an overall mean stem diameter of 47.60 cm. This same study revealed that the highest average diameter (53.2 cm) at an altitude greater than or equal to 2100 m and the lowest average diameter (41 cm) at 1800 - 1900 m altitude  (Mpouam et al., 2022) .  Mpouam et al. (2022)  also found a variation in logged and unlogged bark thickness with altitude. These authors found average bark thicknesses of 7.54 mm, 7.30 mm, 7.23 mm, and 6.80 mm for the logged portion at elevations of 1800 - 1900 m, 1900 - 2000 m, 2000 - 2100 m, and above 2100 m, respectively. Considering these same altitudes, the average bark thickness values for the non-harvested portion are in the order of 16.75 mm, 15.40 mm, 15.18 mm and 14.20 mm respectively  (Mpouam et al., 2022) . These mean bark thicknesses of the unharvested portion are close to those of this study.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Regeneration, Recovery and Average Annual Bark Growth Rates</title><p>In this study, the average annual average bark growth rate (TAM) was 2.97 &#177; 0.90 mm for the Ruwenzori-Lume site and 2.23 &#177; 0.74 mm for the Walikale-Kano site after a 5-year rotation. For both sites studied, the rate of reconstitution was greater than 80% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). This rate is higher than that reported by  Mpouam et al. (2022)  who found an average annual rate of increase in bark thickness of 1.12 &#177; 0.47 mm/year. In the Tchabal Mbabo forest in Cameroon,  Wilfried et al. (2022)  report an average annual bark growth rate of 1.3 mm/year for a bark regeneration rate of 60% after a 7-year rotation.  Mpouam et al. (2022)  also found a variation in mean annual bark growth rate (MAPR) with elevation. These authors found that the mean TAM of 1.08 mm, 1.14 mm, 1.12 mm and 1.04 mm respectively at altitudes of 1800 - 1900 m, 1900 - 2000 m, 2000 - 2100 m and above 2100 m. The rate of increase in this study is higher than the average reported by  Stewart (2009)  who found a value of about 0.34 mm per year; a rate that is similar between the different diameter classes.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Post-Debarking Vulnerability of P. africana by Diameter Class</title><p>Based on the inventory data, across two study sites (Ruwenzori-Lume and Walikale-Kano), post-debarking tree mortality is 2.23% between 2017 and 2022. This rate is low compared to values reported in the literature. A study was conducted on Mount Cameroon on a 100 ha plot where two harvesting methods of P. africana (2/4 and 4/8) are practiced  (Wete et al., 2020) . These authors found that after a five-year rotation, out of a total of 170 trees harvested by both, only 128 (75.30%) trees were alive, 35 trees were dying (20.51%) and 7 (4.12%) trees were dead. This mortality is more attributed to the 4/8 debarking technique with 35.70% dying and dead trees compared to 14% for the 2/4 technique  (Wete et al., 2020) . Other research showing high mortality rates relative to the value of this study has also been reported from Mount Cameroon. One study indicates a survival rate of 70.53% and a mortality of 29.47%. Another conducted on a sample of 3058 harvested trees revealed 5 years later that 2134 trees (69.9%) were in good health compared to 924 (30.1%) in poor health and not harvestable  (Wete et al., 2020) . In Kenya,  Gladys (2020)  observed that more than 90% of the trees that died after debarking of which more were small in diameter (less than 30 cm)  (Gladys, 2020) . Another study was conducted in Isecheno (Kakamega Forest, Kenya), one of the locations where the species is experiencing rapid mortality. This study reveals that between 1997 and 2003, 21% of P. africana (10 cm DBH) at Isecheno died and an additional 9% experienced canopy dieback  (Fashing, 2004) . Other work provides further evidence of the detrimental effects of large-scale debarking on P. africana populations. In Equatorial Guinea, one study found that 68% of logged P. africana were either dead or undergoing canopy decline. However, not all declines of P. africana appeared to be related to unsustainable bark harvesting practices. In another study of P. africana near the southernmost end of its geographic distribution along the Bloukrans River Gorge in South Africa,  Geldenhuys (1981)  found that 47% of the 10 cm DBH standing stems were dead, but he did not mention the effect of bark removal  (Fashing, 2004) .</p><p>The results of this study show that all diameter classes are sensitive to debarking, but the highest percentage of post-barking mortality was obtained for trees between 90 and 120 cm in diameter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). This observation is similar to  Stewart (2009)  who found that diameter class is not a significant predictor of tree death.  Stewart (2009)  found that diameter class was not a significant predictor of tree death. He suggested that other factors were involved in mortality, such as the location of the harvest. Trees that were harvested without disturbing the vascular cambium survived better and suffered a minimal crown loss. Thus, the fate of trees in a given plot may depend on the care taken by an individual harvester  (Stewart, 2009) .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The objectives of this work were to acquire data on the standards of exploitability in the field in the different sites of P. africana in North Kivu and to study the influence of altitude on growth parameters (tree diameter, bark diameter, tree height, etc.). The results show high tree recovery rates. At the Ruwenzori-Lume site, 304 trees out of 311 debarked trees have recovered between 2016 and 2022, i.e. a recovery rate of 97.75%. Similarly, 396 trees out of 405 debarked trees have recovered in the Walikale-Kano site, i.e., a rate of 97.77%. A high percentage of post-barking mortality was obtained for trees with a diameter between 90 and 120 cm. However, the diameter of the bark of harvested trees and that of the bark of unharvested trees varied significantly between sites (p &lt; 0.05). The hypothesis that growth parameters vary with site and elevation is supported. Based on the average annual increment in bark thickness, a 7-year half-rotation can be used in North Kivu subject to more detailed studies on bark cover. As a prospect, future research should be focused on the influence of edaphic determinism (physicochemical and biological properties of soils) on the post-bark response of Prunus africana. In addition, understanding the effects of environmental factors (soil types, climate, altitude, etc.) on the chemical composition of bark is a domain of research that would contribute to the advancement of knowledge of the species in the region. Finally, socio-economic and ethnobotanical analyses of Prunus africana in North Kivu province should be conducted. These investigations will contribute to the development of sustainable management policies for this species, which is at risk due to its multiple usages.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Muhesi, K. E., Kapiri, M. M., Betti, J. L., &amp; Din, N. (2023). Post Debarking Response of Prunus africana (Hook. F) Kalkman (Rosaceae) Trees at Two Exploitation Sites in North Kivu (Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo). Open Journal of Forestry, 13, 161-181. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2023.132011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.123488-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Achille, L. S., Zhang, K., Eloge, K. M., Kouassi, C. J. A., &amp; Michel, M. M. (2021). Influence of Spatial Distribution on the Regeneration of Piptadeniastrum africanum and Ocotea usambaernsis in Kalikuku, Lubero, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Open Journal of Ecology, 11, 527-539. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2021.117034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Betti</surname><given-names> J. L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>. Non-Detriment Findings Report on Prunus africana (Rosaceae) in Cameroon</article-title><source> NDF Workshop Case Studies WG1—Trees Case Study</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>41</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Betti</surname><given-names> J. L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Ambara</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>. Mass of Prunus africana Stem Barks on Tchabal Mbabo and Tchabal Gang Daba Mountain Forests, Cameroon</article-title><source> African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 204</fpage>-<lpage>221</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Betti, J. L., Feruzi, M., Rushemeza, J., &amp; Nzigiyimpa, L. (2014). Sustaining Prunus africana (Hook. F.) Kalkman (Rosaceae), A CITES Listing Tree Species in the Teza. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 674-680. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2014.0721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Betti, J.-L., &amp; Lejoly, J (2010). Contribution à la connaissance des plantes médicinales de la Réserve de Biosphère du Dja au Cameroun: Plantes utilisées dans le traitement des maux de dos. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 4, 193-200. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v4i1.54246</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bii</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Korir</surname><given-names> K. R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Rugutt</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Mutai</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>. The Potential Use of Prunus africana for the Control, Treatment and Management of Common Fungal and Bacterial Infections</article-title><source> Journal of Medicinal Plants Research</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 995</fpage>-<lpage>998</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cuni-sanchez, A., Pfeifer, M., Marchant, R., &amp; Burgess, N. D. (2016). Ethnic and Locational Differences in Ecosystem Service Values: Insights from the Communities in Forest Islands in the Desert. Ecosystystems Services, 19, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.04.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cunningham, A. B., Ayuk, E., Franzel, S., Duguma, B., &amp; Asanga, C. (2002). An Economic Evaluation of Medicinal Tree Cultivation: Prunus africana in Cameroon. People and Plants Working Paper 10, UNESCO.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dinerstein, E., Varma, K., Wikramanayake, E., Powell, G., Lumpkin, S., Naidoo, R., Korchinsky, M., Valle, C. D. E. L., Lohani, S., Seidensticker, J., Joldersma, D., Lovejoy, T., &amp; Kushlin, A. (2013). Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism. Conservation Biology, 27, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01959.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eloge</surname><given-names> K. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mo&amp;#239;se</surname><given-names> M. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mo&amp;#239;se</surname><given-names> K. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Carine</surname><given-names> K. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Alex</surname><given-names> K. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Léon</surname><given-names> P. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Gilbert</surname><given-names> P. N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2022</year>)<article-title>. Influence de l’ombrage sur les paramètres morphométriques du cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) dans la localité de Buyinga en territoire de Lubero (Nord-Kivu, RD Congo)</article-title><source> International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies</source><volume> 36</volume>,<fpage> 420</fpage>-<lpage>434</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fashing, P. J. (2004). Mortality Trends in the African Cherry (Prunus africana) and the Implications for Colobus Monkeys (Colobus guereza) in. Biological Conservation, 120, 449-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garelick, S., Russell, J., Richards, A., Smith, J., Kelly, M., Anderson, N., Jackson, M. S., Doughty, A., Nakileza, B., &amp; Ivory, S. (2022). The Dynamics of Warming during the Last Deglaciation in High-Elevation Regions of Eastern Equatorial Africa. Quaternary Science Reviews, 281, Article ID: 107416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geldenhuys, C. J. (1981). Prunus africana in the Bloukrans River Gorge, Southern Cape. South African Forestry Journal, 118, 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00382167.1981.9630526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gladys, C. (2020). Abundance and Conservation Status of Prunus africana in Western Mau Forest, Kenya (94 p.). Thesis, Kenyatta University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ICCN (Institut Congolaispourla Conservationdela Nature) (2021). Avis de CommerceNon Préjudiciable pour l’exploitation et le commerce de Pygeum (Prunus africana (F. Hook) Kalkman (Rosaceae)) en République Démocratiquedu Congo. 3 ème édition, Kinshasa, Décembre 2021, 64 p. https://cites.org/sites/default/files/vc-files/files/ACNP%20PRUNUS_%20Doc%20avec%20corrections_DRC.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ingram, V., Awono, A., &amp; Schure, J. (2009). Guidance for a National Prunus africana Management Plan, Cameroon (pp. 1-158). Center for International Forestry Research, Food and Agriculture Organization, Cameroon FAO-CIFOR.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jacobs, L., Dewitte, O., Poesen, J., Delvaux, D., Thiery, W., &amp; Kervyn, M. (2016). The Rwenzori Mountains, a Landslide-Prone Region? Landslides, 13, 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0582-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jeruto</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Charles</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> George</surname><given-names> O.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Lukhoba</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>. An Inventory of Medicinal Plants That the People of Nandi Use to Treat Malaria</article-title><source> Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 1192</fpage>-<lpage>1200</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kassambara, A. (2020). ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based Publication Ready Plots. R Package Version 0.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kembelo, K. (2008). Atelier sur la mise en oeuvre des recommandations sur l’étude du Commerce important de Prunus africana, Naiwasha, Kenya, Du 8 au 11 Septembre 2008. Situation de Prunus africana en République Démocratique du Congo (15 p.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koros</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Malombe</surname><given-names> I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mwendwa</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Jeruto</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Humphrey Agevi</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Konje</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>. Indigenous Knowledge, Uses and Conservation of Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman in Nandi Forests</article-title><source> Journal of Natural Sciences Research</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 56</fpage>-<lpage>62</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laporte, N., Baccini, A., Goetz, S., Mekui, P., &amp; Bausch, A. (2010). Une première estimation de la biomasse ligneuse aérienne d’Afrique sur la base d’images satellites et d’inventaires forestiers. In Proceeding of the Conference on Carbon Stock and Fluxes (pp. 58-65). COMIFAC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lescuyer, G., &amp; Cerutti, P. O. (2013). Politques de gestion durable des forêts en Afrique Centrale: Prendre en compte le secteur informel. CIRAD.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewis, S. L., Sonké, B., Sunderland, T., Begne, S. K., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., van der Heijden, G. M. F., Phillips, O. L., Affum-Baffoe, K., Baker, T. R., Banin, L., Bastin, J.-F., Beeckman, H., Boeckx, P., Bogaert, J., De Cannière, C., Chezeaux, E., &amp; Clark, C. J. (2013). Above-Ground Biomass and Structure of 260 African Tropical Forests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368, 20120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0295</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez, M. L., Pérez-Maqueo, O., Vázquez, G., Castillo-Campos, G., García-Franco, J., Mehltreter, K., Equihua, M., &amp; Landgrave, R. (2009). Effects of Land Use Change on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Tropical Montane Cloud Forests of Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 1856-1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbatudde, M., Mwanjololo, M., Kakudidi, E. K., &amp; Dalitz, H. (2011). Modelling the Potential Distribution of Endangered Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman in East Africa. African Journal of Ecology, 50, 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2012.01327.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGlynn, G., Mackay, A. W., Rose, N. L., Taylor, R. G., Leng, M. J., &amp; Engstrom, D. R. (2010). Palaeolimnological Evidence of Environmental Change over the Last 400 Years in the Rwenzori Mountains of Uganda. Hydrobiologia, 648, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0144-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mo&amp;#239;se</surname><given-names> M. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Eloge</surname><given-names> K. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mo&amp;#239;se</surname><given-names> K. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Alex</surname><given-names> K. M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2022a</year>)<article-title>. Incidence et sévérité de la chenille légionnaire d’automne (Spodoptera frugiperda J. E Smith) sur la culture du ma&amp;#239;s (Zea mays L.) en localité de Kivira (Nord-Kivu, RD Congo)</article-title><source> International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies</source><volume> 36</volume>,<fpage> 449</fpage>-<lpage>467</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mo&amp;#239;se</surname><given-names> M. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Eloge</surname><given-names> K. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mo&amp;#239;se</surname><given-names> K. K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Florence</surname><given-names> K. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kanyere</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Dieudonne</surname><given-names> M. S. D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Paul</surname><given-names> P. M. J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2022b</year>)<article-title>. Influence des systèmes de culture sur l’incidence et sévérité de la mosa&amp;#239;que africaine du manioc en localité de Kivira (Nord-Kivu, RD Congo)</article-title><source> International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies</source><volume> 36</volume>,<fpage> 435</fpage>-<lpage>448</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mpouam, A. R., Bile, A. W., Wete, E., Betti, J. L., Kouobegne, S., Fouadjio, B. J., Njimbam, O. F., Ngueguim, J. R., Brice, P., Ottou, M., &amp; Kourogue, L. R. (2022). Etat des lieux de l’exploitation de Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman (Rosaceae) dans la région de l’ Adamaoua, Cameroun. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 16, 1507-1521. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v16i4.13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhesi</surname><given-names> K. E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Mate</surname><given-names> J.-P. M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2018</year>)<article-title>. Evaluation of Natural Regeneration of Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman in the Operating Sites of the Province of North Kivu at the Democratic Republic of Congo</article-title><source> Journal of Research in Biology</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 2550</fpage>-<lpage>2557</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mwitari, P. G., Ayeka, P. A., Ondicho, J., Matu, E. N., &amp; Bii, C. C. (2013). Antimicrobial Activity and Probable Mechanisms of Action of Medicinal Plants of Kenya: Withania somnifera, Warbugia ugandensis, Prunus africana and Plectrunthus barbatus. PLOS ONE, 8, e65619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065619</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakulopa, F., Vanderkelen, I., Van de Walle, J., van Lipzig, N. P. M., Tabari, H., Jacobs, L., Tweheyo, C., Dewitte, O., &amp; Thiery, W. (2022). Evaluation of High-Resolution Precipitation Products over the Rwenzori Mountains (Uganda). Journal of Hydrometeorology, 23, 747-768. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0106.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otieno, N. E., &amp; Analo, C. (2012). Local Indigenous Knowledge about Some Medicinal Plants in and around Kakamega Forest in Western Kenya. F1000Research, 1, 40. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.1-40.v2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robert, M., &amp; Saugier, B. (2003). Contribution of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Carbon Sequestration. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 335, 577-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0713(03)00094-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Russell, J., Eggermont, H., Taylor, R., &amp; Verschuren, D. (2009). Paleolimnological Records of Recent Glacier Recession in the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda-D. R. Congo. Journal of Paleolimnology, 41, 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-008-9224-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schloerke, B., Cook, D., Larmarange, J., Briatte, F., Marbach, M., Thoen, E., Elberg, A., &amp; Crowley, J. (2021). GGally: Extension to 'ggplot2'. R package version 2.1.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GGally</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stewart, K. (2009). Forest Ecology and Management Effects of Bark Harvest and Other Human Activity on Populations of the African Cherry (Prunus africana) on Mount Oku, Cameroon. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 1121-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stewart, K. M. (2003). The African Cherry (Prunus africana): Can Lessons Be Learned from an Over-Exploited Medicinal Tree. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 89, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2003.08.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tassiamba, S. N., Betti, J. L., Temgoua, L. F., Kourogue, L. R., Bile, A. W. N., &amp; Mpouam, A. R. (2022). Evaluating the Role of Governance in the Management of Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman in the Adamawa Region of Cameroon. Open Journal of Forestry, 12, 408-431. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2022.124023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, R. G., Mileham, L., Tindimugaya, C., &amp; Mwebembezi, L. (2009). Recent Glacial Recession and Its Impact on Alpine Riverflow in the Rwenzori Mountains of Uganda. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 55, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.04.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, R. G., Mileham, L., Tindimugaya, C., Majugu, A., Muwanga, A., &amp; Nakileza, B. (2006). Recent Glacial Recession in the Rwenzori Mountains of East Africa Due to Rising Air Temperature. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025962</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tibasiima, T. K., Ekyaligonza, D. M., &amp; Bwambale, B. (2022). Can Agroecology Provide a Panacea for Sustaining the Adoption of Soil Erosion Control Measures? A Case of Smallholder Coffea arabica Production in the Rwenzori Mountain Region, Uganda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14, 13461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013461</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tonye, M., Stella, A., Ndam, N., &amp; Blackmore, P. (2000). State of Knowledge of Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman. Report Established for Central Africa Region at Program for the Environment (CARPE).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wete, E., Betti, J. L., Ngueguim, J. R., Dibong, S. D., &amp; Njukouyou, N. O. F. (2020). Analyse comparative de la soutenabilité des méthodes d’exploitation de Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman en vigueur au Cameroun: Incidence biologique et socio-économique. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14, 1405-1415. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i4.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wilfried</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Bile</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mpouam</surname><given-names> A. R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Betti</surname><given-names> J. L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Aimé</surname><given-names> L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kourogue</surname><given-names> L. R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Fouadjio</surname><given-names> B. J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Yimga</surname><given-names> M. F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Wete</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Njimbam</surname><given-names> O. F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Afiong</surname><given-names> N. N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Billong</surname><given-names> P. F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Ela</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Tassiamba</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Tientcheu</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Bem</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Guedem</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2022</year>)<article-title>. Potential and Measures for Sustaining Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman (Rosaceae) in Tchabal Mbabo Forest (Mf), Adamaoua Cameroon</article-title><source> African Journal of Plant Science</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 157</fpage>-<lpage>173</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.123488-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xue, L., Gani, N. D., &amp; Abdelsalam, M. G. (2017). Geomorphologic Proxies for Bedrock Rivers: A Case Study from the Rwenzori Mountains, East African Rift System. Geomorphology, 285, 374-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.009</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>