OJIMOpen Journal of Internal Medicine2162-5972Scientific Research Publishing10.4236/ojim.2023.131004OJIM-123485ArticlesMedicine&Healthcare Management of Rhabdomyolysis and Acute Renal Failure Following Strenuous Exercise in Young Adult: A Case Report MusabEltayeb1*AmnaSirag2HishamAlamin3*AlnourElagib4*Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, IrelandInternal Medicine, Sudan Medical Specialization Board, Khartoum, SudanInternal Medicine Department, Karary University, Omdurman, SudanDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan020220231301233115, January 202326, February 2023 1, March 2023© Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 2014This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Introduction: Rhabdomyolysis is severe and life threating condition in which skeletal muscles are damaged by dissolution of striped muscles. Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been widely reported (13% - 50%) as a complication of Rhabdomyolysis in which the main pathophysiological mechanisms are intra-renal vasoconstriction, intraluminal cast formation (Tamm-Horsefall) and direct myoglobin toxicity. In this report we are going to describe the management of Acute Kidney Injury due to Rhabdomyolysis that is not responding to vigorous rehydration. Objective: Reporting about acute renal failure induced by Rhabdomyolysis due to Excessive Exercise and dehydration in young patient. Case Report: A 20 years male came to the outpatient clinic complaining of sever lower limb pain, back pain and vomiting. He was anuric and hypertensive (BP = 150/90 mmHg) with serum creatinine and urea levels of 15.72 mg/dl and 235 mg/dl, respectively. The diagnosis was based on the laboratory finding of creatine kinase = 3127 IU/l. The patient, then, has been referred to the emergency department. The Management plan was based on two arms: Emergency Management with Urgent Hemodialysis for AKI and high fluid replacement therapy. Patient started to recover after three hemodialysis sessions but the peak of recovery was noted after starting manual fluid replacement therapy with a target urine output of greater than 2 ml/kg, a urine pH of greater than 6. Manual fluid replacement therapy consisted of loop diuretics, intravenous fluids and intravenous sodium bicarbonate 1.26%. Full recovery was noted after one month of hospital admission with inpatient care and regular follow-up. A follow-up after one month has been set to assess the patient progression and monitor his kidney functions. Relevance and Impact: Home messages and lessons are; Firstly, young adults are vulnerable to Rhabdomyolysis, second, the diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis can be made on the clinical bases but a confirmatory laboratory test of Creatine Kinase is mandatory, and lastly’ acute kidney injury needs to be treated urgently. Also, reducing the risk of infection is one of the management objectives to achieve recovery.

Rhabdomyolysis Acute Kidney Injury Strenuous Exercise Case Report Manual Fluid Replacement Therapy1. Introduction

This Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome characterized by muscle necrosis followed by release of intracellular muscle contents into the circulation. The intracellular muscle contents which are released after muscle injury include: Massive plasma myoglobin levels exceeds protein binding (of haptoglobin).

It has numerous causes: use of drugs, muscles trauma, exposure to toxins, infections, hyperthermia, seizures and electrolytes abnormalities leading to cell lysis through ischemia and acidosis [1] - [7] .

Strenuous exercise may lead to disintegration of striated muscles, resulting in release of muscles constitutes into extracellular fluid and circulation. This consequently cause pigment-nephropathy and AKI [8] [9] . AKI has been reported to complicate 13% - 50% with average of 33% cases of Rhabdomyolysis [1] [10] . The pathophysiology of AKI induced by Rhabdomyolysis is: intra-renal vasoconstriction, direct tubular toxicity and tubular obstruction by Tamm-Horsfall protein containing casts all of which are precipitated by presence of myoglobin [1] .

The Classic Triad of Rhabdomyolysis (Myalgia, Generalized weakness and Darkened urine) is only seen in 50% of patient and it is less common in Children [11] . Physical examination patient may have muscular pain and tenderness, decreased muscle strength, soft tissue swelling and skin changes consistent with pressure necrosis. The most commonly involved muscle groups in adults include: the calves and the lower back. Chest, back and calf pain often mimics other common conditions such as deep vein thrombosis or angina. Peripheral pulses might be intact even after evolving of compartment syndrome because it is very late sign. Even if the patient is lacking the classic history, physical examination findings or both, diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis should not be rolled out if the suspicion is based on clinical scenario and an appropriate laboratory evaluation should be performed to diagnose muscle damaged and organ dysfunction [4] .

Diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis can be confirmed using certain laboratory studies [12] . For Muscle injury the most reliable and sensitive indicator is creatine kinase (CK). It presents in serum immediately after muscle injury, rise within 12 hours and reach a peak in 24 - 36 hours, and decrease at a rate of 30% - 40% per day [13] . The serum half-life of CK is approximately 36 hours. CK Levels decline 3 - 5 days after resolution of Muscle injury [12] . Renal profile should be performed. Despite being a diagnostic marker for Rhabdomyolysis, initial creatine kinase levels do not predict mortality. However, creatinine initial levels are related to progression to acute renal injury and mortality at 30 days [14] . Other Routine investigations should be performed such as Complete Blood Count, urine analysis and Serum Chemistries such Glucose, Liver function tests and Potassium to detect complications.

The complications of Rhabdomyolysis beside AKI are: Electrolyte abnormalities such as hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia and hypoalbuminemia, Compartment syndrome and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) [4] [12] [15] .

There are few publications on exercise induced Rhabdomyolysis leading to AKI exist in the literature. After taking Clearance and patient consent, we are reporting exercise induced Rhabdomyolysis leading to AKI case of 20 years old male.

2. Case Report2.1. Patient Information’s and Clinical Findings

A 20 years male was exercising vigorously in a hot and humid weather without keeping a good hydration. 24 hours after his vigorous exercise he came to the outpatient clinic complaining of vomiting everything he eats, lower limbs pain (Myalgia), back pain and he was unable to pass urine. He was referred from the outpatient clinic with a provisional diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis to the emergency department. The vomiting was following any oral intake. The patient vomited twice before presenting to the outpatient clinic and he was fasting because he did not want to vomit. The patient is not known to have any chronic illnesses (Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Asthma etc.). The patient is not known to have any allergies. He had no history of hospital admission, surgical operations nor blood transfer. The patient is originally from Sennar a state that is around 300 km away to the north of Khartoum the capital of Sudan. There is a family history of DM and hypertension. On examination the patient looked unwell, he was febrile (38˚C), His Blood pressure was 151/88 mmHg and his pulse rate was 82 b/min (Table 1). He had tender back and lower limbs. No other abnormalities were detected. The following investigation was requested: Creatine Phospho-kinase, Serum phosphorus, Serum Calcium, Serum Uric Acid, Renal function test, complete blood picture and blood film for malaria. The patient was admitted to the emergency ward and planned for the following: urine input/output chart, vigorous fluid replacement therapy with rate of 125 ml/hour and nephrology unit consultation. Results of investigation were available in the 2nd day of admission (Table 2). The diagnosis has been confirmed in the 4th day of admission with the CPK level is 3127 IU/L. The nephrology unit decided 3 urgent hemodialysis sessions for the patient in 2nd day of admission. Management

Showing vital signs during hospital stay
DaysVitals
Blood pressurePulse rateRespiratory rateTemperature
1st day 2nd day 3rd day 4th day 5th day 6th day 7th day 8th day 9th day 10th day 11th day 12th day 13th day 14th day 15th day 16th day 17th day 18th day 19th day 20th day 21st day 22nd day 23rd day 24th day 25th day 26th day 27th day 28th day151/88 150/90 130/70 170/90 160/90 180/110 160/90 150/100 160/80 140/90 140/80 170/110 130/70 155/80 140/80 130/90 150/90 - 130/70 - - 90/70 130/80 - - 140/80 - 140/8082 80 70 68 80 96 88 86 116 67 94 97 - 80 82 88 72 - 74 76 - 110 90 - - 94 - 8222 20 18 21 24 20 21 26 32 19 23 20 25 22 22 20 22 - - - - 22 20 - - 22 - 2138 36.5 37.3

with 3 liters of Normal Saline continued along with Ranitidine. After the 2nd dialysis session the patient blood pressure started to rise BP = 150/90 mmHg (Table 1). Amlodipine 5 mg had been added to the management plan. After the 3rd dialysis session the blood pressure was recorded was really high reaching = 170/90 mmHg (Table 1). On the 5th day of admission the patient completed the 3 urgent dialysis sessions of 9 hours and half with 250 blood flow and ultrafiltration of 2000. The blood pressure was still high with 160/90 and the amlodipine had been increased to 10 mg. The creatine level was 9.2 mg/dl and urea was 90 mg/dl (Table 2). The nephrology unit decided to continue the dialysis with a 4th

Showing most important the blood investigations during hospital stay
InvestigationsDays
2nd3rd4th5th9th13th
CPK Urea Creatinine S. Magnesium S. Phosphorus S. Potassium S. Calcium S. Sodium WBC PLT HB Glucose T. Protein Albumin AST ALT PTT INR BFFM Uric acid--- 235 15.7 2.7 0.2 3.6 8.4 128 7.6 344 11.6 195 4.7 2.3 295 341 −ve--- 204 14.8 3.9 134 1003127 137 12.09 4.1 147 98 7.39--- 90 9.20 4.1 139 7.4 306 10.1 −ve--- 94 10.67 3.3 144 102166 86 7.62 3.0 145 10693 55 3.2 3.8 147 9895 4.1 2.7 143 9362 2.61 3.0 144 9.0 500 9.148 0.8 3.7 11828 1.1 4.0 135 6.5 461 9.7 138

session. The fluid input/output chart was not established and patient started to develop puffiness of the face, the patient was still complaining of vomiting and injectable Ondansetron 8 mg once daily had been added to the management plan instead of the pantoprazole 40 mg and the ranitidine 25 mg. On the 6th day of admission the fluid input/output chart had been established indicating a positive difference in the input and output chart of 1420 ml not being cleared from the body (Table 3). On the 7th day of admission the patient developed generalized edema and puffiness of the face. The input/output chart indicated a positive difference of 1500 ml (Table 3). Furosemide had been added after several discussion with the nephrology unit. Antihistamine and Hydrocortisone trial had been initiated to guard against hypersensitivity reaction to Amlodipine. On the 8th day of admission the patient developed fever temperature was 37.3˚C and shortness of breath with respiratory rate of 26 cycle/min (Table 1). Arterial blood gases test was obtained (Table 4) and the balance in the 8th day of admission was 2550 ml positive balance (Table 3). Ceftriaxone 1 gm intravenously twice a day and paracetamol one gram intravenously as needed had been added. The furosemide had been stopped based on the recommendation of the nephrology

<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>demonstrates the input and output chart during important hospital milestones
DaysInput/Output Chart
Oral intakeIntravenousTotal InputUrine outputVomitingTotal OutputBalance
6th 7th 8th 9th 11th350 ml 100 ml 450 ml 1700 ml 1800 ml2220 ml 3000 ml 3500 ml 3100 ml 2500 ml2570 ml 3100 ml 3950 ml 4800 ml 4300 ml800 ml 1500 ml 1200 ml 1900 ml 3500 ml250 ml 100 ml 200 ml 200 ml 0 ml1150 ml 1600 ml 1400 ml 2100 ml 3500 ml1420 ml 1500 ml 2550 ml 2700 ml 800 ml
 Arterial blood gas upon admission
ABGResults
pH pCO2 pO2 HCO−1 3 SpO2 Na+ K+ Lactic acid Anion gap Hb7.399 27.7 mmHg 126 mmHg 17.3 mmol/l 98.9% 137 mmol/l 3.5 mmo/l 1.1 mmol/l 12.1 9.9 g/dl

unit. After thoroughly discussing the case with the nephrology unit the fluids had been shifted to fluid therapy with bicarbonate. The plan of fluids was as following: 4 liters of fluids divided; into 1 liter of Dextrose 5% with Sodium bicarbonate 75 ml, alternating with 1 liter of Normal Saline every 6 hours. On the 9th day BP was 160/80 mmHg, fever has stopped and vomiting decreased to 2 times per day RR was 32 cycle/minute (Table 1). Hypersensitivity drugs had been stopped and fluid balance was positive with 2700 ml and the urine output increasing to 1900 ml per day (Table 3). The high fluids therapy with bicarbonate showed tremendous improvement in the renal function test (Table 2). The patient underwent the 4th dialysis session in the 11th day of admission. After the hemodialysis session and fluid therapy, the facial swelling and puffiness has subsided slightly. The fluid and bicarbonate therapy continued and Ondansetron had been increased to be administered twice a day and promethazine hydrochloride to be administered if needed. The facial swelling and urine output improved as the balance had reach almost positive 800 ml (Table 3). CPK was done in the 13th day of admission and found to be 166 IU/L. The renal function test was improving with combination of fluid therapy and bicarbonate Sodium (Table 2). Blood pressure started to be maintained with Amlodipine 10 mg daily (Table 1). On the 17th day of admission CPK found to be 93 IU/L. On the 22st day of admission the patient had low potassium in his RFT as he did not establish oral feeding well due to his fear of vomiting. KCL 30 mmol had been added to his fluid therapy three times per day (Total of 1.5 L of NS) and bicarbonate sodium had been stopped. Regular Ondansetron had been shifted to be administered if there was vomiting and antihypertensive had been stopped. On the 22th day of the patient started to develop fever, chills and shivering. TWBCs was high (Table 2) and he vomited twice his blood pressure was 90/60 mmHg (Table 1). Urine catheter had been inserted for more than 21 days which led to UTI. Antibiotics had been changed to vancomycin and cefepime with renal impairment consideration. Fluids had been increased to 1 liter and 30 mmol KCL 3 times a day. Catheter had been removed. On the 26th day of admission the patient RFT has normalized and he started full oral intake (Table 2). Urinary Catheter had been removed 2 days previously and dialysis catheter planned to be removed after discharge. On the 28th day of admission patient discharge decision has been taken by a joint meeting between Medicine unit and nephrology unit. A follow-up after 1 month was scheduled. The follow-up will be mainly to assess the kidneys function and to measure the blood pressure. The prognosis after full recovery from the Acute Kidney injury is promising.

2.2. Discussion

This case needed close monitoring and multidisciplinary team approach as the internal medicine joined effort with the nephrology unit and nursing staff of the general ward. The integration of manual fluid replacement and bicarbonate usage was new to all nursing and junior doctors as it is not used regularly.

Strengths of this case included the early diagnosis of the case has leaded to prompt management. A strong support of the diagnosis was the CK levels that were tested very early after the presentation was which was very high with more than 3000 (Table 2). One of the main limitations was in-spite of the early diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis, Acute kidney failure which has responded to hemodialysis only. A major limitation was the catheter associated infection which has slowed down the recovery and increased inpatient stay. The urinary catheter has stayed for more than 14 days which indicated poor documentation and handover.

Relevant literature and case reports:

The presentation was almost typical in this case with exception of red urine. The patient was not able to pass urine in the presentation. Usually the presentation of the Rhabdomyolysis patient is muscle pain and red urine [1] . The severity of this is demonstrated by the presentation of the patient with acute kidney injury which a sign of the severity of the case [16] . There are cases that have been reported with higher CK levels but it has not reach the severity of this case with acute kidney injury [16] . The management of this case is considered the classic management of any patient presenting with acute kidney injury induced by Rhabdomyolysis [6] .

Take home messages are fluid replacement should not be delayed. The invasive devices should be checked their duration should be documented in the patient chart and files. The earlier removal of invasive devices should be considered if deemed appropriate as hospital acquired infection is always expensive in terms of hospital stay and financial burden.

The patient consent has been taken from the patient himself and the case report has been discussed with him and the importance of the case report has been explained too.

2.3. Conclusion

Rhabdomyolysis can be expected in young adults especially after strenuous exercise. The patient should be treated promptly as multi-organ failure is a complication associated with the delay of management. The manual fluid therapy should be initiated immediately and compartment syndrome management should be avoided as it can delay the recovery, though, it should not be delayed if needed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Eltayeb, M., Sirag, A., Alamin, H. and Elagib, A. (2023) Management of Rhabdomyolysis and Acute Renal Failure Following Strenuous Exercise in Young Adult: A Case Report. Open Journal of Internal Medicine, 13, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojim.2023.131004

ReferencesBosch, X., Poch, E. and Grau, J.M. (2009) Rhabdomyolysis and Acute Kidney Injury. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0801327Rawson, E.S., Clarkson, P.M. and Tarnopolsky, M.A. (2017) Perspectives on Exertional Rhabdomyolysis. Sports Medicine, 47, 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0689-zPaller, M.S. (1988) Hemoglobin- and Myoglobin-Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats: Role of Iron in Nephrotoxicity. American Journal of Physiology, 255, F539-F544. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.1988.255.3.F539Vanholder, R., Sever, M.S., Erek, E. and Lameire, N. (2000) Rhabdomyolysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 11, 1553-1561. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.V1181553Haas, C.E., Magram, Y. and Mishra, A. (2004) Rhabdomyolysis and Acute Renal Failure Following an Ethanol and Dihenhydramine Overdose. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 37, 538-542. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1C241Moore, K.P., Holt, S.G., Patel, R.P., et al. (1998) A Causative Role for Redox Cycling Myoglobin and Its Inhibition by Alkalization in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Rhabdomyolysis-Induced Renal Failure. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273, 31731-31737. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.48.31731Sulowicz, W., Walatek, B., Sydor, A., et al. (2002) Acute Renal Failure in Patients with Rhabdomyolysis. Medical Science Monitor, 8, CR24-CR27.Schwaber, M.J., Liss, H.P., Steiner, I. and Brezis, M. (1994) Hazard of Sauna after Strenuous Exercise. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120, 441-442. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-5-199403010-00029Yu, F.C., Lu, K.C., Lin, S.H., et al. (1997) Energy Metabolism in Exertional Heat Stroke with Acute Renal Failure. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 12, 2087-2092. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/12.10.2087Gabow, P.A., Kaehny, W.D. and Kelleher, S.P. (1982) The Spectrum of Rhabdomyolysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 61, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792-198205000-00002Luck, R.P. and Verbin, S. (2008) Rhabdomyolysis: A Review of Clinical Presentation, Etiology, Diagnosis and Management. Pediatric Emergency Care, 24, 262-268. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816bc7b7Huerta-Alardin, A.L., Varon, J. and Marik, P.E. (2005) Bench-to-Bedside Review: Rhabdomyolysis—An Overview for Clinicians. Critical Care, 9, 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2978Lappalainen, H., Tiula, E., Utoila, L. and Manttari, M. (2002) Elimination Kinetics of Myoglobin and Creatine Kinase in Rhabdomyolsis: Implication for Follow-Up. Critical Care Medicine, 30, 2212-2215. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200210000-00006Baeza-Trinidad, R., Brea-Hernando, A., Morera-Rodriguez, S., et al. (2015) Creatinine as Predictor Value of Mortality and Acute Kidney Injury in Rhabdomyolsis. Internal Medicine Journal, 45, 1173-1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12815Beetham, R. (2000) Biochemical Investigation of Suspected Rhabdomyolsis. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 37, 581-587. https://doi.org/10.1258/0004563001899870Pawaskar, A.S. and Joshi, W.V. (2020) Case Report: What’s Causing This Severe Case of Rhabdomyolysis? The Rheumatologist.