<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2023.143015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-122889</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Average Luminous Mass of Early Galaxies at &lt;I&gt;z&lt;/i&gt; = 10 - 20 Predicted as ~10&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt; Solar Masses
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>T.</surname><given-names>R. Mongan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Sausalito, CA, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>02</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>208</fpage><lpage>211</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper predicts the average luminous mass of galaxies that will be detected by JWST space telescope at redshift 
  <em>z</em> ≈ 10 - 20. The prediction, derived in the paper, is based on holographic analysis, developed from quantum mechanics, general relativity, thermodynamics, and Shannon information theory. Consistent with early JWST data, ~10
  <sup>9</sup> solar masses is the predicted average luminous mass of early galaxies at z ≈ 10 - 20 that will be detected by JWST.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Galaxies: High-Redshift</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Luminous galaxy candidates at z &gt; 10 revealed by JWST indicate “future deep JWST observations may identify relatively bright galaxies to much earlier epochs than might have been expected” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref1">1</xref>]. As explained below, holographic analysis based on quantum mechanics, general relativity, thermodynamics, and Shannon information theory indicates galaxies with mass ~10<sup>9</sup> solar masses should be expected at z = 10 - 20. The analysis does not assume or require a theory specifically relating arrangements of bits of information on holographic screens to distribution (as opposed to amount) of mass within such screens.</p><p>Behroozi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref2">2</xref>] listed some early predictions for what JWST will see, and then used a supercomputer simulation to predict JWST will find galaxies z &gt; 10 with masses considerably below those revealed by early JWST data. In contrast, the prediction from holographic analysis below, ~10<sup>9</sup> solar masses for average luminous mass of galaxies at z ≈ 10 - 20, is consistent with early JWST results.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Holographic Analysis</title><p>Our post-inflationary universe, dominated by vacuum energy, has cosmological constant Λ = 1.088 &#215; 10 − 56   cm − 2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref3">3</xref>] and event horizon radius R H = 3 Λ = 1.661 &#215; 10 28   cm . Holographic analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref4">4</xref>] finds only a finite number N = π ln ( 2 ) ( R H l P ) 2 = 4.741 &#215; 10 122 of bits of information on the event horizon are available to describe our universe, where Planck length l P = ℏ G c 3 = 1.616 &#215; 10 − 33   cm .</p><p>Friedmann’s general relativistic equation H 0 2 = 8 π G 3 ρ c r i t + Λ c 2 3 for a flat Euclidean universe with critical density and cosmological constant requires Ω Λ ≡ Λ c 2 3 H 0 2 . PDG 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref3">3</xref>] lists present day Hubble expansion rate H 0 = 67.4   km / ( sec ⋅ Mpc ) , critical density ρ c r i t = 3 H 0 2 8 π G = 8.53 &#215; 10 − 30 g / cm 3 , dark energy density parameter Ω Λ = 0.685 , Hubble length c / H 0 = 1.37 &#215; 10 28   cm , and matter density ρ m = ( 1 − Ω Λ ) ρ c r i t . PDG parameters result in Λ c 2 3 Ω Λ H 0 2 = 0.997 , so our universe is indistinguishable from flat Euclidean space to three significant figures. Mass within the event horizon M H = 4 3 π ( 1 − Ω Λ ) ρ c r i t R H 3 = ( 1 − Ω Λ ) c 2 2 G 3 Λ = 5.14 &#215; 10 55   g is constant in time, and M H = [ ( 1 − Ω Λ ) c 2 2 G ( H 0 c ) 2 3 Λ ] R H 2 = ( 0.187   g / cm 2 ) R H 2 . The constant mass per bit of information m b i t = M H / N = 1.08 &#215; 10 − 67   g .</p><p>In a fundamental sense, information specifies location of matter in space, and holographic analysis indicates 4.741 &#215; 10<sup>122</sup> bits of information on the spherical holographic screen (SHS) of the event horizon are associated with matter within our observable universe. Holographic analysis then indicates information and associated mass M within isolated gravitationally bound systems relates to radii R of spherical holographic screens around system centers of mass by M = ( 0.187   g / cm 2 ) R 2 .</p><p>Cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation density at redshift z is ρ r ( z ) = ( 1 + z ) 4 ρ r ( 0 ) , where mass equivalent of today’s radiation energy density ρ r ( 0 ) = 4.59 &#215; 10 − 34 g / cm 3 . Matter density ρ(z) is much greater than radiation density and Jeans mass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref5">5</xref>] M J = π 48 ρ m 2 [ 2 c 3 π ρ r ( 0 ) G ] 3 = 2.30 &#215; 10 50   g , the upper limit on mass of gravitationally bound systems stable against gravitational collapse, is independent of z . Large scale structures at z &gt; 10 are gravitationally bound systems of individual stars with masses between Jeans mass M J and minimum stellar mass m ∗ min ( z ) at redshift z .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Minimum Stellar Mass at Redshift z</title><p>Minimum stellar mass m ∗ min ( z ) is estimated by setting escape velocity of protons at SHS radius R ∗ min for minimum stellar mass equal average velocity of protons in equilibrium with CMB radiation outside the SHS for m ∗ min ( z ) . Protons in equilibrium with CMB outside the SHS for stellar systems with mass &lt; m ∗ min ( z ) can transfer energy to those systems until they reach m ∗ min ( z ) . Escape velocity v for protons of mass m p gravitationally bound at radius R from system center of mass M is calculated from 1 2 m p v 2 = G M m p R . Escape velocity of protons on the SHS for minimum mass stars with mass M at redshift z is velocity of protons in thermal equilibrium with CMB, so 3 2 k T ( z ) = G M m p R , where CMB temperature T ( z ) = ( 1 + z ) 2.725   K and Boltzmann constant k = 1.38 &#215; 10 − 16 ( g ⋅ cm 2 / sec 2 ) / K . With radius R = M / ( 0.187   g / cm 2 ) for structures of mass M , m ∗ min ( z ) = 1 0.187 ( 1.5 k ( 1 + z ) 2.725 G m p ) 2 g , so m ∗ min ( 10 ) = 8.26 M ⊙ , m ∗ min ( 12 ) = 11.5 M ⊙ , and m ∗ min ( 20 ) = 30.1 M ⊙ , with solar mass M ⊙ = 2 &#215; 10 33   g . If outgoing protons at the SHS are in thermal equilibrium with outgoing photon flow from minimum mass stars, stars must have mass &gt; m ∗ min ( z ) to appear against the CMB background. Maximum star mass 6 &#215; 10 35   g ≈ 300 M ⊙ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref6">6</xref>] coincided with minimum star mass at z ≈ 65 , consistent with indications stars first formed at z ≈ 65 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref7">7</xref>]. At z = 0 , minimum star mass ≈ 1.4 &#215; 10 32   g = 0.07 M ⊙ , consistent with hydrogen burning mass threshold separating brown dwarfs from lowest mass stars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref8">8</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Average Galactic Mass at Redshift z</title><p>With no good reason to suspect information describing gravitationally bound systems is not uniformly distributed between mass bins, the number of gravitationally bound systems of mass m at redshift z can be taken as n ( m ) = K / m with constant K . Then total mass of observable gravitationally bound systems at redshift z is M H ≈ ∫ m ∗ min ( z ) M J m ( K m ) d m = K ( M J − m ∗ min ( z ) ) and K ≈ M H / M J = 2.24 &#215; 10 5 . The number of observable gravitationally bound structures in Jeans mass M J at redshift z is N ( z ) = ∫ m ∗ min ( z ) M J K m d m = K ln ( 2.30 &#215; 10 50   g / m ∗ min ( z ) ) . Estimated average total mass of observable gravitationally bound structures at redshift z, M a v g ( z ) = M J / N ( z ) , at z = 10 - 20 is ~ 1.4 &#215; 10 10 M ⊙ , between estimated Milky Way mass ~ 10 45   g ~ 10 12 M ⊙ and dwarf galaxy masses ~ 10 40   g ~ 10 7 M ⊙ .</p><p>PDG 2022 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref3">3</xref>] lists baryon density fraction of the universe Ω b = 0.0493 , so stellar mass is Ω b / ( 1 − Ω Λ ) = 0.0720 times total galactic mass. Then stellar mass ~ 10 9 M ⊙ of galaxy candidates at redshift z ≈ 10 - 12 identified by Naidu et al. in JWST data is consistent with “early appearance of UV-luminous galaxies with stellar masses as high as ≈ 10 9 M ⊙ already at few 100 Myr after the Big Bang” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122889-ref1">1</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Holographic analysis predicts the average galaxy detected by JWST space telescope at redshift z ≈ 10 - 12 will have luminous mass of about 10<sup>9</sup> solar masses, consistent with early JWST data.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mongan, T.R. (2023) Average Luminous Mass of Early Galaxies at z = 10 - 20 Predicted as ~10<sup>9</sup> Solar Masses. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 208-211. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.143015</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122889-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naidu, R., Oesch, P., van Dokkum, P., et al. (2022) The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 940, L14. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122889-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Behroozi, P., Conroy, C., Wechsler, R., et al. (2020) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 499, 5702-5718. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122889-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Workman, R., Burkert, V., Crede, V., et al. (2022) Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022, 083C01.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122889-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bousso, R. (2002) Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 825-874. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.825</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122889-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mongan, T. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 50-54. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.47A1006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122889-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crowther, P., Schnuur, O., Hirschi, R., et al. (2010) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 731-751.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122889-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naoz, S., Noter, S. and Barkana, R. (2006) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 373, L98-L102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00251.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122889-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mireles, I., Shporer, A., Grieves, N., et al. (2020) AJ, 160, 133.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>