<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8359</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2023.141001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJG-122711</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Application of a Multi-Criteria Approach for the Assessment of Groundwater Potential in the Basement Zone: A Case of Tamou (South West Niger)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saidou</surname><given-names>Garba Inaytoulaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdel</surname><given-names>Kader Hassane Saley</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Issoufou</surname><given-names>Sandao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Issa</surname><given-names>Garba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Geology, Groundwater and Georesources Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Abdou Moumouni University of Niamey, Niamey, Niger</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Computer Sciences and Research, Agrhymet Regional Center, Niamey, Niger</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The commune of Tamou, located in the Department of Say in Niger, occupies the southwestern part of the Liptako crystallophyllian basement domain. In 
  this area, the problem of 
  the 
  drinking water supply of the populations is acute, b
  ecause of the low flow rates of the drillings capturing the crystallophyllian formations and the 
  Voltaian
   sandstones, the failure rates of the drillings are very high there. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to improve the knowledge of the areas potentially favorable for the implantation of drillings likely to give more satisfactory flow rates. The methodological approach, based on the collection of data (Landsat 7 ETM+ satellite imagery, borehole data, geological and topographical maps) and their processing by a combination of remote sensing and GIS tools and a field check, allowed the elaboration of maps of availability, accessibility and exploitability of the groundwater resources in the study area. The maps developed were analyzed with a Spatial Reference Hydrogeological Information System following the technique of aggregation by weighting to generate the map of productive drilling sites. The results show that the area is moderately rich in groundwater (58%) and that only 31% of the potential is exploitable. The groundwater potential map shows that 46% of the study area is suitable for drilling.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Multi-Criteria Analysis</kwd><kwd> Remote Sensing</kwd><kwd> GIS</kwd><kwd> Discontinuous Aquifers</kwd><kwd> Tamou</kwd><kwd> Niger</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In Niger, recurrent droughts since the 1970s have pushed the populations of the northern part of Tillab&#233;ry (Ouallam Department) to move to the south of the region in search of better living conditions.</p><p>The commune of Tamou, the study area, was one of the areas where these populations settled. It is an outcrop area of the Niger Liptako with a Sahelo-Sudanese climate, where the potential for water resources is very limited. The exploitable water tables are random and their capacity is low, making access to drinking water for populations and their livestock difficult.</p><p>Consequently, several investigation methods have been used to find sites that are favorable for drilling for water (geophysics, fracturing, drilling techniques). Nevertheless, the rate of dry boreholes capturing the crystallophyllian formations of the Liptako and the sandstones Voltaian remains high, more than 23%, and several boreholes considered positive have flow rates of less than 1 m<sup>3</sup>/hour according to an analysis of 200 borehole data sheets collected for the study area.</p><p>This situation of the critical shortage of drinking water has negative impacts on the living conditions of rural populations. The latter is forced to rely on surface water during the winter months (ponds, rivers, koris, etc.) and on groundwater through wells, which are exposed to the risk of pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref1">1</xref>]. Also, these alluvial aquifers of limited extension are strongly dependent on rainfall patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>These constraints, likely to increase due to the persistent impacts of climate change and demographic pressure, require a more in-depth study of groundwater resources in general and in the basement zone in particular. The main objective of this study is to improve the conditions for drilling water with higher flow rates (reducing the high rates of negative drilling). Specifically, this study aims to: 1) analyze satellite images and physiographic and hydroclimatic data, hydrogeological characteristics of aquifers and borehole data of the study area; 2) develop maps of Drainage Density (DD), Fracture Density (FD), Alteration Thickness (AT), Static Level (SL), etc.; and 3) apply multi-criteria techniques.</p><p>This paper is structured into three parts including generalities, materials and methods, and results and discussion respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Presentation of the Study Area</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Geographic Location</title><p>The rural commune of Tamou, the area of this study, is located in the Department of Say, Tillabery Region. It lies between 12˚40’ and 13˚ North latitude and between 1˚50’ and 2˚50’ East longitude (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) in the southwestern part of Niger. It covers an area of 5230 km<sup>2</sup> with an estimated population of about 104,070 inhabitants in 2016, with an annual growth rate of 3.9%, and a density of 38 inhabitants/km<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>The climate is Sahelo-Sudanese, characterized by an average annual rainfall of about 698 mm, observed at the Tamou rainfall station (1981-2016), with average annual temperatures around 29.2˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>The relief of the area is little marked, slightly undulating with altitudes between 170 m and 260 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref5">5</xref>]. The vegetation is presented in the form of a mosaic of facies, and is of the tiger bush type on the cuirassed plateau, while it is organized more as an agroforestry park largely dominated by Combretaceae on the glacis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref6">6</xref>]. The study area is on the right bank, drained by three major tributaries of the Niger River: the Goroubi, the Diamangou and the Tapoa. Thus, the Niger River is the only permanent watercourse of the hydrographic network, and crosses the study area over a distance of about 55 km [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref5">5</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Geological and Hydrogeological Context</title><p>The geological context of the study area is dominated by three major lithological units (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) which are:</p><p>● Paleoproterozoic or Birimian age formations, 2300 to 2000 Ma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref7">7</xref>]; these are greenstone belts (meta-volcano-sedimentary, shales, conglomerates, and greenstones (amphibolites, metagabbros, meta-microgabbros, etc....) and granitoid plutons (quartz or amphibole diorites, syenogranites, manzogranites, granodiorites);</p><p>● The Voltaian formations, essentially constituted by sandstones, quartzic, conglomerates with coarse grains (pebbles and gravels) of size varying from approximately 2 to 8 cm, with sandstone matrix;</p><p>● The sedimentary cover grouping the formations of the terminal continental (CT3) and the quaternary deposits.</p><p>Groundwater resources are contained in two types of aquifers:</p><p>● Continuous aquifers, but of limited extension and localized only in areas of depression. These are the sedimentary formations (CT3, alluvium and colluvium);</p><p>● Discontinuous aquifers encountered in fractured horizons of the Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic formations.</p><p>This study focuses on discontinuous aquifers which are the most sought after because of their water quality and the high rate of dry drilling.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Data</title><p>The main data used in this study are:</p><p>● An extract of the GeoCover Circa 2000 mosaics (N30-10 and N30-15) from the October 2000 Landsat 7 ETM+ satellite image downloaded from http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/;</p><p>● Four 30 m resolution SRTM DTM data clippings downloaded from https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/;</p><p>● Cartographic backgrounds (geological map of Liptako (1/200,000), printed in 1988 at IGN of Paris under the control of BRGM, provided by the Ministry of Mines of Niger, topographic map of Kirtachi at a scale of 1/200,000, obtained from the Ministry of Hydraulics and Sanitation of Niger);</p><p>● The fracturing and induced permeability maps used in this study are those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref5">5</xref>];</p><p>● The data sheets of 199 hydraulic boreholes, acquired from the Ministry of Hydraulics and Sanitation of Niger and its partners;</p><p>● Hydroclimatic data, provided by the National Meteorological Directorate of Niger.</p><p>The tools used are: Envi 4.4 for processing satellite images and ArcGIS10.2.2 for producing thematic maps.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Methods</title><p>The elaboration of the mapping of groundwater potentialities includes four important steps: 1) identification and elaboration of decision criteria; 2) classification and standardization of these criteria in order to elaborate indicators; 3) weighting of criteria and their combinations according to the multi-criteria approach; 4) validation of the thematic maps through uncertainty analysis.</p><p>In fact, the parameters related to groundwater potentiality are grouped into three quantitative indicators: availability, accessibility and exploitability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref10">10</xref>].</p><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Identification and Development of Decision Criteria</title><p>The work of several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref21">21</xref>] was evaluated and synthesized to define the criteria selected for this study. The choice of these criteria refers to the different indicators: availability, accessibility and usability.</p><p>The availability indicator provides information on the existence of a groundwater aquifer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref21">21</xref>]. Indeed, in the crystalline and crystalline basement zone, several criteria condition the existence of the availability of groundwater resources, nevertheless, six criteria have been selected in this study because of their importance. These are: effective infiltration (mm), slope (%), drainage density (Km/Km<sup>2</sup>), fracture density (Km/Km<sup>2</sup>), induced permeability (m/s) and alteration thickness (m).</p><p>The accessibility indicator identifies areas where groundwater is accessible. According to these authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref23">23</xref>], it is obtained by combining the depth of the structures (m) and the success index. These two criteria are considered as economic and social factors, because they promote or not the access to the resource [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>The exploitability indicator conditions the presence or absence of drilling in a given area, because as soon as it has been proven that the resource is not exploitable, there is no need to drill [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref16">16</xref>]. It combines criteria such as: the exploitation rate (m<sup>3</sup>/h) and the piezometric level (m).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Classification and Standardization of Criteria</title><p>This classification took into account previous works [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref13">13</xref>] carried out in similar areas and also on the one proposed by the CIEH (Comit&#233; Interafricain des Etudes Hydrauliques) for criteria such as flow rate and alteration thickness. The number of classes is 3 in this study, for a simple and better interpretation. These are the classes: weak, medium and strong.</p><p>The phase of standardization allowed normalizing the criteria that were measured at different scales and in different units. In fact, a common interval of 1 to 10 is maintained, according to which the most favorable class is rated 10, while the most unfavorable is rated 1.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Weighting and Aggregation of Criteria</title><p>Weighting is used to assign weights to each criterion. Thus, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref16">16</xref>], the value of the weights is relative to the importance of the criterion in the accomplishment of the phenomenon that the indicator reflects. The weighting is based on mathematical calculations while giving weighting coefficients and standardized, between 0 and 1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref11">11</xref>] to the criteria of a factor, and whose sum is equal to 1. Within the framework of this study, the method of weighting chosen is that of comparisons by pair through the process of hierarchical analysis (Analytical Hierarchy Process). This method was developed by the mathematician [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref24">24</xref>]. Indeed, several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref25">25</xref>] have used this method successfully in the pedestal zone, contrary to the weighting technique based on the arbitrary choice of weights [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>The matrix in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the pairwise comparison proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref24">24</xref>]. It allows calculating the eigenvector values Vp, which will facilitate the determination of the weighting coefficients Cp. The procedure is described as follows:</p><p>● The comparison judgment matrix: The generation of the comparison matrix is based on the pairwise comparison method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref24">24</xref>]. A matrix is obtained (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), as a result of the judgment made by comparing the criteria two by two, while transcribing the values of the evaluations in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> in each corresponding column;</p><p>● To configure a reciprocal rectangle matrix formed by the evaluations of the ratios of weights (K &#215; K), K being the number of elements compared; we obtain in this way: a = a<sub>ij</sub> with a<sub>jj</sub> = 1 and a<sub>ji</sub> = 1/a<sub>ij</sub> (inverse value), where a is the value of each factor; and i and j constitute the rows and columns, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref26">26</xref>].</p><p>Calculation of the eigenvector Vp and weight of the criteria, the values of the eigenvectors were obtained by calculating their geometric mean per line, according to Equation (1):</p><p>Vp = ∏ i n g i n (1)</p><p>V<sub>p</sub>: eigenvector; n: number of criteria; g<sub>i</sub>: score of criterion i.</p><p>The weighting coefficient for each criterion is obtained by dividing each eigenvector by the total sum of them. The values of the eigenvectors and the weighting coefficients are recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison scale</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Digital Scale or Intensity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Verbal Scale or Definition</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Commentary</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal importance of both elements: equally important</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Both elements compete in the same way with the objective</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >One item is slightly more important than the other: Slightly more important</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Experience and personal judgment slightly favor one element over the other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >One element is more important than the other: highly important</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Experience and personal judgment really favor one element over the other</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >One element is much more important than the other: very strongly important</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >One element is largely dominant, and this dominance is demonstrated in practice</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >One element is absolutely important than the other: very strongly important</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The dominance of one element over another is demonstrated and absolute</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,1, 2, 4, 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate value between two judgments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Used to refine one’s judgment</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reciprocity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >If element i is assigned one of the previous numbers when compared to element j, then j will have the inverse value when compared to i</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: Comparison scale from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref24">24</xref>], modified.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Pairwise comparison matrix for the availability, accessibility and exploitability indicator criteria</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Disponibility Indicator</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IE</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >DD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IE</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DD</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1/5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FD</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1/5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1/5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Accessibility Indicator</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Parameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Total Depth</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Index of Success</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total Depth</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Index of Success</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Exploitability Indicator</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Parameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Operating Flow Rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Piezometric Level</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Exploitation Rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Piezometric Level</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>P: Slope; IE: Effective Infiltration; DD: Drainage Density; DF: Fracture Density; Pi: Induced Permeability; AT: Alteration Thickness.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Eigenvector values and weighting coefficients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Indicators</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Criteria</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Vp</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cp</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Disponibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Is</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Exploitability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>TD: Total Depth; Is: Success Index; and Qex: Operating Flow.</p><p>Consistency Ratio (CR), the method of Saaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref26">26</xref>] has an advantage of checking the consistency of the judgment made when comparing more than two criteria, through the calculation of the consistency ratio. This check is made on the availability indicator where the compared criteria exceed 2. The coherence ratio is determined by the ratio of the Coherence Index (CI) and the Random Index (RI) proposed by Saaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref26">26</xref>]. Thus, a reasoning is said to be consistent when its consistency ratio is less than or equal to 10%. The values of the random index are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> according to the number of parameters compared.</p><p>However, IC is obtained following a methodological approach divided into five steps:</p><p>First step is to multiply each column by the corresponding weighting Coefficient (Cp), which gives the matrix of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, below:</p><p>Second step is to sum the elements of each row of the matrix; the results of this step are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>Third step is to divide the totals of each line by the Cp corresponding to it, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> represents this step.</p><p>Fourth step lies in determining a parameter λ<sub>max</sub>, which is the average of the results obtained in step 3. The operation is as follows (Equation (2)):</p><p>λ<sub>max</sub> = (6.56 + 6.56 + 6.16 + 6.18 + 3.06 + 6.07)/6 = 6.26 (2)</p><p>Fifth step corresponds to the calculation of the CI while applying the formula in Equation (3):</p><p>CI = (λ<sub>max</sub> − number of criteria)/(number of criteria minus one) (3)</p><p>IC = (6.26 − 6)/(6 − 1)</p><p>This index will determine the Consistency Ratio (CR) which must be less than or equal to 10% (Equation (4)).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Scale of random indices according to the number of elements compared [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref25">25</xref>]</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >9</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >11</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >12</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >13</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >14</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >15</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>N: Number of Criteria. In this study, N = 6, then IA = 1.24.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> First step of the determination of the CI</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AT</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.786</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.505</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Second step of the CI calculation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.724</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.786</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.505</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.834</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.298</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.626</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.639</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.305</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Third step of the CI determination</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cp</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total (T)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T/Cp</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.724</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.298</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.626</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.639</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.07</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>CR = CI/AI ↔ CR = 0.052/1.24 (4)</p><p>Aggregation of the criteria, which is the sum of the standardized and weighted values of each criterion involved in the development of the indicator concerned. This provides a suitability index on a scale of 0 to 10 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref12">12</xref>], since the sum of the weighting coefficients generated by Saaty’s method is 1. It is expressed by Equation (5):</p><p>S = ∑ i = 2 n W i X i (5)</p><p>S: sum; W<sub>i</sub>: weight of criterion i; X<sub>i</sub>: standardized value of factor criterion i.</p><p>The establishment of the thematic map of a given indicator, will consist of plotting in a geographical space the different values resulting from the sum of the standardized and weighted values of each intervening criterion of said indicator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref27">27</xref>].</p><p>Validation of multi-criteria maps by uncertainty analysis, this step is based on uncertainty analysis. The method used in this study is based on the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref21">21</xref>]. The formula in Equation (6) is used to calculate the uncertainties in the averages of the various parameters of the main indicators given:</p><p>Δ X = σ / m (6)</p><p>ΔX: uncertainty in the mean of the data set; σ: standard deviation of the data set; m: number of data.</p><p>Thus, an expansion factor (K) is calculated, in order to determine the confidence level. The parameter K is used to define a sufficiently wide confidence interval with the aim of having high confidence in the results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref21">21</xref>]. The expression of this factor K is given by Equation (7):</p><p>K = (E − X)/σ (7)</p><p>K: expansion factor and E: the extreme value of the statistical series (the minimum or maximum of the series).</p><p>The confidence levels of the different parameters were deduced from the different values of K. Thus, K = 1 for a 68% confidence level; K = 2 for a 95% confidence level and K = 3 for a 99% confidence level.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Coherence Ratio</title><p>The value of the Coherence Ratio found is 4.2%, which is less than 10%, which justifies that the reasoning is said to be very consistent.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Availability of Groundwater Resources</title><p>The thematic availability map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) is composed of three qualifying classes, which are distributed as follows:</p><p>● The low availability class represents 34%, and is scattered throughout the study area. This class is characterized by a low thickness of red sandy-silty soils with armor, constituting the products of alteration. These parameters are unfavorable to the recharge of a water table, hence the works are less productive;</p><p>● The class with average availability occupies 50% of the study area. It is found mainly in the shallows of the major and minor beds of the Goroubi and Diamangou rivers and in the southern part (bed of the Tapoa) of the study area, where there is active vegetation. In addition, this class is also characterized by a relatively flat relief. Consequently, these two geomorphological units are favorable for groundwater recharge;</p><p>● The high availability class covers 16% of the study area. It is observed in the Diamangou valley, in the northwest on the Burkina-Faso border, towards Bala Rimaib&#233; and in the eastern part, around the Niger River valley. This class is characterized by the type of stony or boulder soils. In addition, fault nodes and kilometer-sized faults have been identified through the Landsat ETM+ satellite image in these areas. These factors undoubtedly contribute to the recharge of aquifers, and will help explain the high availability of water resources in this area. This class is sought by hydrogeologists.</p><p>The summation of the class of medium and high availability, gives a coverage rate of 66% of the total area of the study area. These results confirm that the study area is moderately covered with a medium availability of groundwater resources, hence the need to map the accessibility of groundwater, in order to identify areas where this availability is easy access.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Accessibility to Water Resources in the Study Area</title><p>The analysis of the accessibility map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) shows 3 classes of unequal distribution.</p><p>Areas of low accessibility occupy 40% of the study area. The structures located in these areas are characterized by high depths, with low probabilities of finding positive boreholes. These zones are mainly found in Bamboma, Dori, L&#233;l&#233;, Lilo, Petay, Tchala Ouro Guile, Yangana, Weressouldou, etc.</p><p>The medium and high accessibility classes are relatively important and represent 29% and 31% respectively, or 60% of the total area of the study zone. These</p><p>classes are found throughout the study area, with the exception of the northwestern part of the study area, corresponding to the sub-surface portion of the Birimian basement. These areas are the most sought after for the implementation of large flow structures. Thus, this map is a guide for hydrogeologists.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Exploitability of Groundwater Resources</title><p>The map generated from the exploitation rates and piezometric levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) shows three distinct classes, as follows:</p><p>● The low exploitable class covers about 69% of the total area of the study area. This is the dominant class and is widespread throughout the study area. This class is characterized by low to very low flow rates;</p><p>● The class of average exploitability covers a quarter (1/4), or 25% of the total area of the said zone. It extends from the central part to the NE - SE of the study area;</p><p>● The strong class represents only 6%, and is found in the extreme east of the study area, corresponding to the edge of the basin of Iullemmeden. This class is found in the villages of Bol&#233;, Diagoga, Bonkoukou kouara, Forgossogo and Yambidiana.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Areas Suitable for the Installation of Large Flow Boreholes</title><p>The map for the location of high flow boreholes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) is obtained by combining the availability, accessibility and exploitability maps. It also shows three different classes.</p><p>The low class occupies 54% and is found almost everywhere in the study area, with the exception of the eastern part and the extreme south. It is characterized by low availability, accessibility and exploitability of groundwater resources. Nevertheless, in this class, the structures can have a flow of about 1 m<sup>3</sup>/h.</p><p>The low flow areas dominate the study area, and are characterized by high drainage densities and low induced permeabilities.</p><p>The middle class represents 26%, and is unevenly distributed over the territory. Indeed, it is mostly observed in the South, South-East and North-East parts.</p><p>The strong class has a portion estimated at about 20%, and is found in the eastern and southeastern parts of the study area. It is characterized by a good accessibility and exploitability, and corresponds to the most favorable area for the implementation of drilling with large flows.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Validation of Thematic Maps</title><p>The thematic maps were validated by calculating the uncertainty associated with the criteria of the different indicators (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p><p>The uncertainties calculated on the availability evaluation parameters vary from &#177;0.076 to &#177;0.671. However, it appears that on all the criteria of this indicator, the errors committed are negligible, apart from that of the infiltration, which is&#177;0.67. The level of confidence is significant with a rate of 95% for all the criteria defined for the elaboration of the thematic map of groundwater availability.</p><p>Regarding the accessibility indicator, the depth and success index parameters have uncertainties of &#177;1.221 and &#177;0.407 respectively, and confidence levels of 95%.</p><p>The exploitability map has a margin of error of &#177;0.814 with a 95% confidence level.</p><p>As for the parameters of the map of potential high flow sites, the errors vary</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical summary of indicator evaluation criteria</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Medium</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Uncertainty</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NC (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Disponibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infiltration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.671</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slope</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;1.221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Is</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Exploitability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qexp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;1.221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Potential at High Flow Rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disponibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.814</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exploitability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.814</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>from &#177;0.259 to &#177;0.814. It should be noted that all these criteria have a 95% confidence level.</p><p>All these thematic maps have a low uncertainty error and a high confidence level (95%), which means that these maps are close to the reality of the field.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>The study area has overall medium to high groundwater availability (66%) which is satisfactory. This good availability is due to the low slopes and significant fracturing density. These two parameters are likely to favor aquifer recharge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref28">28</xref>]. This good water availability, observed throughout the study area, could be explained by the presence of agricultural land, possessing a high infiltration capacity. These results are in line with those obtained in the Korhogo department in C&#244;te d’Ivoire by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref29">29</xref>] in the Tamil Nadu area in China, by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref30">30</xref>] in the Lobo watershed in C&#244;te d’Ivoire, by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref18">18</xref>] and finally in the Bandama watershed in C&#244;te d’Ivoire by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref9">9</xref>]. Nevertheless, it is important to know that the identification of areas with medium and high potential does not guarantee a 100% success rate of drilling, even if the probability seems high [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref14">14</xref>]. In addition, the geophysical study and other socio-cultural data (proximity of cemeteries, places of worship etc.) must be integrated.</p><p>Accessibility is dominated by the middle and strong classes, with a cumulative 60% coverage of the study area. This would indicate that the majority of boreholes in these areas have depths, more or less average, between 30 and 60 m, with high success rates (greater than or equal to 70%). These results are in agreement with the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>The groundwater exploitability of the study area is difficult, as 69% is dominated by the low class. In fact, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref31">31</xref>], granites and shales represent the most productive lithological formations in fractured or altered basement zones. Nevertheless, the weak class remains dominant in this sector. This observation can be explained by the absence of serious studies before the implementation of drilling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref13">13</xref>]. However, the areas of medium and high exploitability are favorable for urban hydraulics and agricultural development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref11">11</xref>]. These classes, which represent 31%, correspond to areas where boreholes generally have more or less important flows. On the other hand, the remaining 69% of the zones are characterized by structures with low or even negative flow rates.</p><p>The zones that are favorable for the installation of large flow boreholes are dominated by the low class. In this class, the flow rates of the wells are around 1 m<sup>3</sup>/h, which is sufficient to supply the populations of small villages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref32">32</xref>]. Thus, the medium class, relatively low (26%), may correspond to acceptable areas for the establishment of boreholes in the context of improved village hydraulics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122711-ref18">18</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>This multi-criteria analysis study, whose objectives were to develop maps of fracture networks and assess the availability, accessibility and exploitability of groundwater resources, in order to help improve knowledge of areas potentially favorable for the establishment of boreholes likely to give more satisfactory flows, shows that: more than half (66%) of the Tamou area has good hydraulic potential, good accessibility and a low class of exploitability.</p><p>The areas suitable for the installation of large flow boreholes (medium and high class) cover less than half (46%) of the study area. These areas are mainly concentrated in the eastern and southeastern sectors, in accordance with the distribution of alluvial plains and agricultural land with high infiltration capacity. These thematic maps remain as a guide and can help in the decision-making process during future hydrogeological prospecting campaigns while avoiding intense failures in the realization of hydraulic works.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors of this paper would like to thank the “International Aid Service (IAS)” Non-Governmental Organization (NGO), the Abdou Moumouni University of Niamey, the Ministry of Hydraulics and Sanitation, for their financial and technical contributions to this work. They also thank the National Direction of Meteorologie (DMN) and the R&#233;gional Center Agrhymet for providing climate data. Our thanks go to our dear departed professor Boureima Ousmane of the Abdou Moumouni University of Niamey for all his efforts in improving the quality of the training of his authors. May his soul rest in peace.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The all authors declare no conflict of interest in this publication.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Inaytoulaye, S.G., Saley, A.K.H., Sandao, I. and Garba, I. (2023) Application of a Multi-Criteria Approach for the Assessment of Groundwater Potential in the Basement Zone: A Case of Tamou (South West Niger). International Journal of Geosciences, 14, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2023.141001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122711-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ousmane, B. (1988) étude géochimique et isotopique des aquifères du socle de la bande sahélienne du Niger (Liptako, Sud-Maradi, Zinder-Est). Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Niamey, Niamey, 441 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdou Babaye, M.S. (2012) Evaluation des ressources en eau souterraine dans le bassin de Dargol (Liptako-Niger). Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Liège, Liège, 265 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INS-Niger (2016) Tableau de Bord Social. Institut Nationale Statistique du Niger, Niamey.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DMN (2016) Direction de la Météorologie Nationale du Niger. http://www.meteo-niger.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saidou, G.I., Koussoubé, Y., Hassane, S.A.K., Sandao, I., Hayes, P. and Ousmane, B. (2019) Groundwater Flow Modeling by Using the Permeability Induced by Satellite Lineaments in Discontinuous Aquifers and Semi-Arid Context: A Case Study of the Liptako Region (South-West of Niger). Journal of Water Resource and Protection (JWARP), 11, 1090-1109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ambouta, K. (1984) Contribution to the Edaphology of the Western Tiger Bush Nigerien. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nancy I, Nancy, 116 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soumaila, A. (2000) étude structurale, pétrographique et géochimique de la ceinture de Diagorou-Darbani, Liptako, Niger Occidental (Afrique de l’Ouest). Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Franche-Comté, Besan&amp;#231;on, 253 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jourda, J.P.R. (2005) Méthodologie d’application des techniques de télédétection et du système d’information géographique à l’étude des aquifères fissurés d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Concept de l’hydrotechnique spatiale: Cas des zones tests de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Thèse de Doctorat d’état ès Sciences Naturelles, Université de Cocody, Abidjan, 429 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mangoua, M.J., Yao, A.B., Douagui, G.A., Kouassi, K.A., Goula, B.T.A. and Biemi, J. (2019) Evaluation des potentialités en eau souterraine des aquifères fissurés dans le bassin versant du Bandama (C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire). Larhyss Journal, 37, 53-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, H.T., Ouedraogo, M., Kouassi, K.L., Bamory, K., Yao, B. and Biemi, J. (2014) Géomorphologie et productivité des forages dans le nord du bassin du fleuve Comoé en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 8, 755-765. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v8i2.32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savané, I. (1997) Contribution à l’étude géologique et hydrogéologique des aquifères discontinus du socle crystallin d’Odienne (Nord-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire). Apport de la télédétection et d’un Système d’Information Hydrogéologique à Référence Spatiale. Thèse de Doctorat ès Sciences Naturelles, Université de Cocody, Abidjan, 410 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saley, M.B. (2003) Cartographie thématique des aquifères de fissures pour l’évaluation des ressources en eau. Mise en place d’une nouvelle méthode d’extraction des discontinuités images et d’un SIHRS pour la région semi-montagneuse de Man Nord-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire). Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Cocody, Abidjan, 209 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youan, T.M., Lasm, T., Jourda, J.P., Saley, M.B., Miessan, G.A., Kouamé, K. and Biémi, J. (2011) Cartographie des eaux souterraines en milieu fissuré par analyse multicritère. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 21, 43-71. https://doi.org/10.3166/rig.21.43-71</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koudou, A., Adiaffi, B., Assoma, T.V., et al. (2013) Conception d’un outil d’aide à la décision pour la prospection des eaux souterraines en zone de socle du Sud-Est de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Revue Internationale de Géologie, de Géographie et d’écologie Tropicale, 37, 211-226.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hyann, P., Coulibaly, N., Coulibaly, T.J.H. and Savane, I. (2015) Cartographie des potentialités en eaux souterraines par l’utilisation de l’analyse multicritère et les Sig: Cas du district du Denguele (Nord-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire). European Scientific Journal, 11, 17 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youan, T.M., Yao, K.A.F., Bakar, D., De Lasm, Z.O., Lasm, T., Adja, M.G., Kouakou, S., Onetie, Z.O., Jourda, J.P.R. and Biemi, J. (2015) Cartographie des zones potentielles a l’implantation des forages a gros débits en milieu fissure par analyse multicritère cas du departement d’Oumé (Centre-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire). Larhyss Journal, 23, 155-181.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koffi, K.M., Yao, K.T., Mobio, A. and Oga, Y.M.S. (2016) Apport de l’analyse multicritère à la cartographie des zones favorables à l’implantation de forages dans la région de Gagnoa (Centre-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire). Geo-Eco-Trop, 40, 327-344.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, A.B., Goula, B.T.A., Kane, A., Mangoua, M.J. and Kouassi, K.A. (2016) Cartographie du potentiel en eau souterraine du bassin versant de la Lobo (Centre-Ouest, C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire): Approche par analyse multicritère. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61, 856-867. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.932360</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdou Boko, B., Konaté, M., Adamou, R. and Abdoulaye, A. (2017) Influence du système de drainage sur la vulnérabilité à la pollution des aquifères du bassin de Tim Merso&amp;#239;, Nord Niger. Afrique SCIENCE, 13, 261-274.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdou, A.I. (2018) Caractérisation des réservoirs aquifères multicouches du bassin des iullemmeden dans la région de Dosso (Sud-Ouest Niger): Apports de la télédétection, du SIG, de la géophysique et de l’hydrogéochimie. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey, Niamey, 310 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouassi, W.F., Kouassi, K.A., Mangoua, M.J., Kamenan, Y.M. and Kouadio, Z.A. (2019) Evaluation des potentialités en eau souterraine de la portion Ivoirienne du bassin versant du Niger. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 25, 774-784.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babaye, M.S.A., Hantchi, K.D., Wagani, I., Ousmane, B.I. and Sandao, I. (2021) Multi-Criteria Analysis Using Remote Sensing and GIS: Insight into Groundwater Potential of the Fissured Aquifers in the Liptako Socle (Southwestern Niger). Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 13, 881-899. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2021.1311047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sorokoby, V.M., Saley, M.B., Kouame, K.F., Djagoua, M.E.V., Bernier, M., Affian, K. and Biémi, J. (2010) Utilisation des images Landsat ETM+ et du SHIRS pour la cartographie linéamentaire et thématique de Soubré-Meagui (Sud-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire): Contribution à la gestion des ressources en eau souterraine. Revue Télédétection, 9, 209-223.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saaty, T.L. (1984) Décider face à la complexité, une approche analytique multicritère d’aide à la décision. Entreprise Moderne d’édition, 231 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Morjani, Z. (2002) Conception d’un système d’information à référence spatiale pour la gestion environnementale; application à la sélection de sites potentiels de stockage de déchets ménagers et industriels en région semi-aride (Souss, Maroc). Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Genève, Genève, 300 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saaty, T.L. (1977) A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oscar, O.Z., Lasm, T., Coulibaly, A. and Baka, D. (2016) Apport du SIG et de l’analyse multicritère dans la prospection hydrogéologique du socle précambrien de Gagnoa (Centre-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire). European Scientific Journal, 12, 137-154. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n23p137</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shankar, R.M.N. and Mohan, G. (2006) Assessment of the Groundwater Potential and Quality in the Bhatsa and Kalu River Basins of Thane District, Western Deccan Volcanic Province of India. Environmental Geology, 49, 990-998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0137-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jourda, J.P., Saley, M.B., Djagoua, E.V., Kouamé, K.J., Biémi, J. and Razack, M. (2006) Utilisation des données ETM+ de Landsat et d’un SIG pour l’évaluation du potentiel en eau souterraine dans le milieu fissuré précambrien de la région de Korhogo (Nord de la C&amp;#244;te-d’Ivoire): Approche par analyse multicritère et test de validation. Revue Télédétection, 5, 339-357.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magesh, N.S., Chandrasekar, N. and Soundranayagam, J.P. (2012) Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones in Theni District, Tamil Nadu, Using Remote Sensing, GIS and MIF Techniques. Geoscience Frontiers, 3, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N’go, Y.A., Gone, D.L., Savane, I. and Goble, M.M. (2005) Potentialité en eaux souterraines des aquifères fissurés de la région d’Agboville (Sud-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire): Caractérisation hydro climatique et physique. Afrique Science, 1, 127-144. https://doi.org/10.4314/afsci.v1i1.35401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122711-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soro, N. (1987) Contribution à l’étude géologique et hydrogéologique du Sud-Est de la C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire (bassin versant de la Mé). Thèse de Doctorat 3è Cycle, Université de Grenoble 1, Institut Dolomieu, Grenoble, 239 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>