<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Medical Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3372</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmm.2023.131002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMM-122673</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Antimicrobial Resistance of &lt;i&gt;Pseudomonas aeruginosa&lt;/i&gt; Isolated from Human Infections in N’Djamena, Chad
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmat</surname><given-names>Mahamat Ahmat</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahamat</surname><given-names>Ali Bolti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fissou</surname><given-names>Henry Yandai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hamit</surname><given-names>Mahamat Alio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Martin-Paul</surname><given-names>Baane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mayoré</surname><given-names>Atéba Djibrine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Evariste</surname><given-names>Bako</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Barro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Choua</surname><given-names>Ouchemi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Institut National Supérieur du Sahara, Iriba, Tchad</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>H&amp;amp;#244;pital de la Caisse Nationale de Prévoyance Sociale, Maroua, Cameroun</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institut de Recherche en Elevage pour le Développement (IRED), N’Djamena, Tchad</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire, d’Epidémiologie et de Surveillance des Bactéries et Virus Transmissibles par les Aliments (LaBESTA), Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences de la Santé Humaine, Université de N’Djamena, N’Djamena, Tchad</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Centre Hospitalier Universitaire la Renaissance (CHU-R), N’Djamena, Tchad</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Ecole Doctorale Sciences Techniques et Environnement, Université de N’Djamena, N’Djamena, Tchad</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>30</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <b>Background:</b>
   Urinary Tract infections and pus are major public health problems. The evolution of bacterial resistance to antibiotics makes the treatment of these infections problematic. This is why this study is undertaken to identify and evaluate the resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antibiotics. <b>Methods:</b> This is a prospective study carried out from December 2020 to November 2021. The germs were isolated on the agar supplemented with cetrimide and identified by the API 20 NE gallery method according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The strains’ resistance profiles were determined by the diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton according to the criteria EUCAST-
   
  2021. <b>Results:</b> A total of 46/1467 (3.13%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified, 
  of which 29/1008 (2.87%) were urinary tract infections and 17/459 (3.70%) were pus. The high resistances were: 97.8% to ceftazidim, 91.3% to aztreonam, 93.5% to cefepim, 82.6% to piperacillin, 58.7% to levofloxacin, 52.2% to amikacin, 47.8% to tazobactam-piperacillin, 47.8% to tobramycin and 43.5% to ciprofloxacin. Low resistance was only 2.2% to fosfomycin, 2.2% to colistin and 15.2% to imipenem. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study reveals the considerable resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to commonly used antibiotics, and thus compromises the empirical treatment practiced in hospitals. This result motivates the need to carry out susceptibility testing of isolates before any prescription of antimicrobials.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Pseudomonas aeruginosa&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Resistance to Antibiotics</kwd><kwd> Urine</kwd><kwd> Pus</kwd><kwd> N’Djamena</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Urinary tract infections and pus are common in Africa and are caused mainly by bacteria. They represent a significant burden for public health due to their high frequency, their cost of treatment, and the treatment failures often observed due to multiple bacterial resistances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref2">2</xref>]. In recent decades, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has established itself as a major hospital pathogen, responsible for a large number of infections remarkable for their severity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref3">3</xref>]. Thanks to its ability to use different organic compounds as energy substrates. This strict aerobic Gram-negative bacillus lives in a wide variety of environments for long periods of time, as long as they are sufficiently humid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref3">3</xref>]. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are often difficult to treat due to both the species’ natural resistance and its remarkable ability to acquire other mechanisms of resistance to several groups of antimicrobial agents. According to the World Health Organization, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae have become resistant to a large number of antibiotics, including carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins, the best antibiotics available for treat multi-resistant bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref4">4</xref>]. This phenomenon means that patient care has become a major concern in infectious therapy due to multi-drug resistance. These bacteria circulate on all continents and it is recommended that each country strengthen surveillance of bacterial resistance by collecting data in microbiology laboratories and carrying out targeted research on antimicrobial resistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref4">4</xref>]. In Chad, very little data is available on bacterial resistance to antibiotics. The published works focus in particular on Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref7">7</xref>]. Antibiotic resistance data for Pseudomonas aeruginosa are not available at this time. This is why this first study was undertaken to assess the resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antibiotics in the major hospitals of N’Djamena. The results of the work could be used as preliminary data to inform healthcare personnel in charge of care about the circulation of these formidable bacteria and the need to readjust treatments in the event of treatment failure in hospitalized patients who are often exposed to the risks of nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Setting, Type of Study, and Period</title><p>This is a prospective study carried out from December 2020 to November 2021 in N’Djamena. Urine and pus samples from hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients were collected in three major hospitals, namely the Mother and Child University Hospital (CHU-ME), the National Reference University Hospital (CHU-RN), and the Hospital of Friendship Chad/China (HATC). The microbiological analyzes were carried out at the CHU-ME. The patient variables considered were age, sex, patient origin, and collection center.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sample Size Calculation</title><p>Due to the absence of data on the prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on human infection in Chad, it was taken the prevalence (P = 25.5%) reported by Kamga [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref8">8</xref>] for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cameroun around Chad. Thus, on the basis of this estimation, the following Lorenz formula was applied: N = ε 2 P ( 1 − P ) / j 2 . This gave a minimal sample size of 392 individuals, by opting for ε value of 1.96, a confidence level of 95%, and a margin of error (j) of 5%. This number was increased to find more bacteria to analyze.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Inclusion and Non-Inclusion Criteria</title><p>The population studied consisted of patients consulted for a cytobacteriological examination of urine and pus, without distinction of sex and age. Urine from patients who complied with the standard collection conditions for bacteriological culture was accepted and included, and samples not complying with the conditions were not included. Similarly, closed and open pus collected using syringes and swabs performed by medical personnel in compliance with clinical microbiology procedures were included. Pus samples that did not follow collection and transport procedures were not included.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Samples Collection and Processing</title><p>These samples were collected in accordance with standard microbiological procedures for sample collection and transport. Each sample was streaked onto cetrimide agar and incubated at 42˚C for 18 - 24 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref9">9</xref>]. Isolated strains underwent Gram staining and oxidase tests for orientation. The identification of isolates was based on biochemical characters using the API 20 NE gallery (BioM&#233;rieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Determination and Antibiotic Susceptibility</title><p>Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar antibiotic disk diffusion method according to the method according to Bauer and collaborators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref10">10</xref>]. The reading and interpretation of the susceptibility tests were carried out according to the recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref11">11</xref>]. The antibiotics studied are: ceftriaxone (30 μg), piperacillin (75 μg) fosfomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam (75/10μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), gentamicin (15 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (30 μg), cefipim (30 μg), colistin (10 &#181;g). Pseudomonas aeruginosa American Type Culture Collection (ATCC10145) was used as a quality control strain.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Phenotypic Detection of ESBL Production</title><p>The detection of ESBL production was studied by the double disc synergy test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref12">12</xref>]. Discs of ceftazidim (30 μg), cefepim (30 μg), cefotaxim (30 μg) and aztreonam (30 μg) were placed next to a disc containing amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10μg) at a distance of 20 mm (center to center) on a Mueller-Hinton II agar plate previously inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. After incubating at 37˚C, an enhancement of the zone of inhibition around at least one of these discs towards the disc containing clavulanic acid indicates the presence of ESBL.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Metallo-β-Lactamase</title><p>Isolates classified as resistant (R) to imipenem were subjected to the metallo-β-lactamase (MBLs) phenotypic test using the imipenem-EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetyl) inhibition method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref13">13</xref>]. The principle of the test is based on the potential of EDTA to inhibit metallo-β-lactamase activity. In order to perform the test, the EDTA was prepared by adding 24.193 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> &#181;g of disodium EDTA-2H<sub>2</sub>O to 130 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> &#181;L of sterile distilled water so that 4 &#181;L of the solution corresponds to 750 &#181;g of EDTA 0.5 M per imipenem disc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref13">13</xref>]. The pH of the EDTA solution was adjusted to 8 with the NaOH solution. Bacterial suspensions were prepared in a 0.8% (w/v) saline solution to obtain a turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard and 100 &#181;L aliquots were inoculated onto MHA plates by the technique of spread plate. Two discs of imipenem (10 &#181;g) were placed 30 mm apart on the inoculated Mueller-Hinton plates. A 4 &#181;L aliquot of EDTA solution corresponding to 750 &#181;g of EDTA was added to one of the discs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref13">13</xref>]. The inoculated dishes were incubated aerobically at 37˚C for 24 h. The diameter of inhibition produced by the imipenem discs (10 &#181;g) alone and the imipenem + EDTA discs (10 + 750) &#181;g was measured to determine the potential of the isolates to produce MBLs. For producers of MBLs, the diameter of inhibition of imipenem + EDTA should be ≥7 mm of that produced by imipenem alone.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Data Analysis</title><p>All data collected were introduced into Microsoft Excel 2010 and imported into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 18.0 for the calculations. All variables calculated were presented as numbers of cases or effective, and percentages.</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Ethical Considerations</title><p>The study received authorization from the Ministry of Public Health and the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine of Chad. In addition to authorizations, individual consent was obtained for the collection of samples for research.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Prevalence and Distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa</title><p>A total of 1467 samples including 1008 urine and 459 pus were analyzed during the study. The overall prevalence was 3.13% (46/1467) including 2.87% (29/1008) in urine samples and 3.70% (17/459) in pus. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by patient age groups, genders, and sample collection sites. The frequencies of the isolates were maximum and equal to 56.52% (26/46) in the age group of 30 - 39 years, compared to the other age groups. The rates of isolates were higher than CHU RN (41.30%) and lower than CHU ME (34.78%) and HATC (23.91%). The infection rates by gender were 54.35% (25/46) in males and 45.65% (21/46) in females with a sex ratio M/F of 1.19. But, 58.62% (17/29) of germs were isolated from females and 41.38% (12/29) from males and pus, 76.47% (13/17) were from males, and 23.53% (4/17) from females.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Distribution of Germs by Department</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the distribution of isolates by hospital department. We observe that 45.65% of Pseudomonas were isolated from patients in internal services and 54.35% from external services. In the internal services, the infection rates were maximum and equal to 26.32% in urology (26.32%) at the CHU RN, 18.75% in Gynecology at the CHU ME, and 27.27% in Medicine and Pediatrics at HATC.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Antibiotic Resistance Profile</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> presents the antibiotic resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. High resistance rates were observed with β-lactams such as ceftriaxon</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from urine and pus</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Urine (N = 29)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pus (N = 17)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total (N = 46)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[0 - 9]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[10 - 19]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[20 - 29]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[30 - 39]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[40 - 49]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[50 and et +]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CHU-ME</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CHU-RN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HATC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.91</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by department</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Service</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CHU-RN (N = 19)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CHU-ME (N = 16)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >HATC (N = 11)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Total (N = 46)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intensive care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pediatrics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gynecology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ORL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traumatology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Internal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total external</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ORL: Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antibiotics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Antibiotics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Urine (N = 29)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pus (N = 17)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total (N = 46)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R + I (N)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R + I (N)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R + I (N)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TZP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CRO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAZ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CPM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AZT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GMN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CIP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LEV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FOS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>N = Number of bacteria; R + I = r&#233;Sistance and Intermediate; PIP = Piperacillin; TPZ = Piperacillin + Tazobactam; CRO = Ceftriaxon; CAZ = Ceftazidim; CPM = Cefepim; AZT = Aztreonam; IPM = Imipenem; GMN: Gentamicin; AK: Amikacin; TOB: Tobramycin; CIP = Ciprofloxacin; LEV = Levofloxacin; FOS = Fosfomycin; COL = Colistin.</p><p>(100%), ceftazidim (98.8%), cefepim (93.5%), aztreonam (91.3%), piperacillin (82.6%), piperacillin/tazobactam (52.2%) and only weak at imipenem (13.0%). They were average with gentamicin (60.9%), amikacin (47.8%), tobramycin (52.2%), ciprofloxacin (56.5.0%), levofloxacin (41.3%). However, fosfomycin (2.2%) and colistin (2.2%) were the most active antibiotics on the isolates.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Phenotype of Enzyme Suspected</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the phenotypes of enzymes suspected in germ resistance to antibiotics. The rates observed were 52.2%, 15.2%, 8.69%, and 23.91%, respectively for EBLSs, CRPAs, MBLs, and other enzymes that were not classified.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Enzyme produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Enzyms</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Urine (N = 29)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pus (N = 17)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total (N = 46)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EBLSs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CRPA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MBLs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.91</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ESBL = Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase, CR = Carbapenemase-producing, MBLs = Metallo-β-lactamase, PA = Pseudomonas aeruginosa.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Pseudomonas aeruginosa has become a pathogen of major public health importance, in particular, because of its frequent involvement in nosocomial and community-acquired infections. The plasticity of its genetic material allows it to acquire mobile genetic elements and to develop the various mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics. The present study showed a prevalence of 3.1% of this germ associated with urinary infections and pus. This prevalence is lower than that obtained by Yasmeen in Bangladesh (4.39%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref14">14</xref>], Ouedraogo in Burkina Faso (6.02%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref15">15</xref>], Frikh in Morocco (7.4%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref16">16</xref>] and Qayoom in India (9.16%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref17">17</xref>]. Higher rates were obtained by Srivastava in Egypt (21.85%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref18">18</xref>] and Gad in India (18%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref19">19</xref>]. These results show variations in infection rates by country and year. According to the types of samples, the proportions of urinary tract infections (2.87%) were almost similar to that of pus (3.70%). This similarity could justify the fact that opportunistic pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa are often involved in abscesses, the various pus at the start of urinary tract infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>The age of the patients studied was 30 - 79 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The individuals with high proportions of infections were those of 30 - 39, compared to the extremities of ages. These results are similar to those of Sissoko in 2006 in Mali [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref21">21</xref>], showing a high rate of urinary tract infections among women in the age groups 16 - 35 and 36 - 65. Our results could be explained by the fact that individuals of the age group of 30 and 39 years are young and more sexually active and represented in this study. However, the frequency of urinary tract infections was higher in the female sexes than in males (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). This difference can be justified by the peculiarity of the female anatomy characterized by its short, wide, straight urethra close to the perianal region and which, during sexual intercourse, causes the opening of the urethral meatus and favors the transfer of commensal bacteria in the bladder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref22">22</xref>]. Unlike men who have a fairly long urinary tract and limit the ascent of bacteria to the urethra and the bladder. This result corroborates the work of Ouedraogo and collaborators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref15">15</xref>] in Burkina Faso, who note that women in this age group are very sexually active and more exposed to urinary tract infections, and some opt for the use of contraceptives in order to avoid pregnancies and others, on the other hand, use tampons during menstruation, and these practices could increase the risk of urinary tract infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref23">23</xref>]. On the other hand, for the pus, on the contrary, the infection rates were higher in males (76.47%) than in females (23.53%). This result is similar to that reported by Qayoom and collaborators highlighting the dominance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in men (66.19%) than in women (33.80%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>According to the services, the strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from internal (45.65%) and external (54.35%) patients and testifies to the significant circulation of germs in the community. This paradigm loading would result from a significant transformation in microbial genetics. Also, strains of hospital origin could colonize the community environment during the discharge of hospitalized patients or by health personnel who also live in the community. The level of hygiene of populations and hospitals could also explain these differences. Some authors maintain that the prevalences generally increase with the level of technicality and the size of the establishments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref24">24</xref>]. Others report that community-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are localized opportunistic infections resulting from local conditions favorable to their development and are often associated with contact with contaminated water or antiseptic solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>Disparities were also observed depending on the services. Infection rates were highest in urology at CHU RN (26.32%), in gynecology at CHU, ME (18.75%), and in medicine and pediatrics at HATC (27.27%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). These rates, which vary by service and hospital, could be related to the patient profile and the medical devices which are different in the three hospitals sampled [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref26">26</xref>]. Women and children are consulted at the CHU ME, adolescents and adults at the CHU RN, and at HATC. Of the three sites, only HATC does not have a laboratory for bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Other studies have reported similar disparities with 15% of nosocomial infections in intensive care units and 10% in medicine and surgery units [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref3">3</xref>]. The low level of hygiene in the hospital can also be the factor that favored the bacteria circulation. The causative germs most often come from the patient himself, but they are transported to the infectious site through personnel or medical devices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref26">26</xref>].</p><p>Regarding the resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to β-lactams, our results revealed a proportion greater than 80% to ceftriaxon (97.8%), ceftazidim (97.8%), aztreonam (91.3%), cefepim (93.5%), piperacillin (82.6%), except piperacillin-tazobactam (52.2%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The β-lactamine resistance phenotypes were essentially ESBL, cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases. These alarming rates of bacterial resistance could be justified by the bacterial selection pressures induced by the inappropriate use of the latest generation antibiotics such as ceftriaxon, cefotaxim, and others of dubious quality which are sometimes sold in pharmacies, on the side of the streets, in markets and by street vendors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref27">27</xref>]. Similar resistances have also been reported by other authors but in sometimes medium and high proportions to ceftazidim (52.31%), aztreonam (52.11%), cefepim (46.45%), piperacillin + tazobactam (47.15%), ticarcillin (70.86%) and cefotaxim (83.58%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref28">28</xref>]. On the other hand, resistance to imipenem was low in the present study (13.0%). It is similar to data provided by Arab countries such as Egypt (10%), Libya (11.1%), Iraq, and Jordan (0%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref29">29</xref>]. He noted that the inactivity of most β-lactamine was linked to the production of ESBL, with the exception of the imipenem-resistant strain whose phenotype of production of a metallo-enzyme was proven by the partial restoration of the sensitivity of imipenem by the action of EDTA. Compared to our study, low proportions of resistance of isolates were obtained to piperacillin-tazobactam at 19% in South Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref30">30</xref>], 21% in France [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref31">31</xref>], and 30% in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref17">17</xref>]. High rates of imipenem resistance were found in the Philippines (31.1%), Singapore (23.3%), Thailand (28.7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref32">32</xref>], and Japan (28.5%). These results show resistance rates of P. aeruginosa vary according to countries, regions, and years.</p><p>Concerning aminoglycosides, resistances were observed to gentamicin (60.9%), amikacin (47.8%), and tobramycin (52.2%). Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Israel showed low aminoglycoside resistance of 25%, 38.7%, and 33.3%, respectively. In addition, a very small proportion (10%) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa previously isolated in Cameroon were resistant to aminoglycosides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref33">33</xref>]. This result, although high, remains lower than an Egyptian ratio (91%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref33">33</xref>]. Moreover, the potential of P. aeruginosa to resist killing by a variety of antimicrobial agents results from the frequent use of several drugs albeit at low doses against diseases caused by these strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>Regarding fluoquinolones, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was resistant to ciprofloxacin (56.5%), and levofloxacin (41.3%). Superior results (68%) were obtained in a previous study on various bacteriological cultures in N’Djamena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref7">7</xref>]. Similar resistances have been reported by Al-Orphaly and collaborators in Saudi Arabia (25%), Iraq (50%), and Israel (44.4%) showed low resistance to aminoglycosides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref29">29</xref>]. It should be noted that resistance to fluoroquinolones has been described by many authors. Plasmid genes (Qnr and AAC (6') Ib-cr) have been described in Enterobacteriaceae. Resistance to ciprofloxacin in this species is exclusively chromosomal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref36">36</xref>].</p><p>Fosfomycin and colistin were very active on the isolates. These antibiotics are not currently available for the treatment of bacterial infections in the country. Colistin in particular has been withdrawn from the treatment of human infections on the grounds of nephrotoxicity. This context justifies the preserved efficiency of these molecules. Mirroring our study, it is not surprising because while the use of colistin in humans is rare in Africa, its use in livestock is unregulated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref37">37</xref>]. The case of resistance observed could come from the veterinary sector and spread to other ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref37">37</xref>]. This indicates that for all antimicrobial agents tested other than colistin, at best, only fosfomycin could serve as an empirical treatment option for P. aeruginosa infections.</p><p>According to the enzymes suspected, medium and low rates of EBLSs (52.2%), CRPA (15.2%), MBLs (8.69%), and other enzymes (23.91%) were observed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This lower prevalence of CRPAs and MBLs observed in Chad could be explained by the limited access to the use of carbapenems in human medicine. Other studies reported higher rates of positive isolates for EBLSs ranging from 52.4% to 82.3% in Poland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref38">38</xref>], 63% in Iran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref39">39</xref>], and 55% of MBLs in burn patients in Turkey [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122673-ref40">40</xref>].</p><p>At the end of this study, we can identify limitations such as the use of molecular methods to detect antibiotic resistance genes in order to better understand the circulation of these dangerous bacteria in the population.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>This study made it possible to identify the strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa involved in urinary tract infections and pus in the National Reference University Hospital, the Mother and Child University Hospital, and the Chad-China Friendship Hospital. It highlights the extent of the problem of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections which are becoming increasingly difficult to treat because of their ability to resist antibiotics. The isolated strains showed strong resistance to β-lactamines, quinolones, and aminoglycosides. Faced with this worrying problem, global awareness is needed. The best ways to fight against urinary tract infections and suppurative pathologies are essentially prevention through population hygiene measures, carrying out antibiotic sensitivity tests before treating patients, respecting the prescription of antibiotics, and public awareness to avoid self-medication in healthcare settings and communities.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We sincerely thank all the participants who took part in this study, in particular Kadidja Gamougam of the “National Reference General Hospital” for allowing us to work on the germs of her bacteriology laboratory. We also thank Dr. Abakar Idriss Lawane and Bertille Dewa for their technical assistance.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no competing interests.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ahmat, A.M., Bolti, M.A., Yandai, F.H., Alio, H.M., Baane, M.-P., Djibrine, M.A., Bako, E., Barro, N. and Ouchemi, C. (2023) Antimicrobial Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Human Infections in N’Djamena, Chad. Open Journal of Medical Microbiology, 13, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmm.2023.131002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122673-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bertholom, C. (2016) épidémiologie des infections urinaires communautaires et nosocomiales. Option/Bio, 27, 23-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0992-5945(16)30116-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zahir, H., Draiss, G., Rada, N., Abourrahouat, A., et al. (2019) écologie microbienne et sensibilité aux antibiotiques des bactéries isolées d’infections urinaires chez l’enfant au Maroc. Revue Francophone des Laboratoires, 511, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-035X(19)30229-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bertrand, X., Slekovec, C., Cholley, P. and Talon, D. (2011) épidémiologie des infections à Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Revue Francophone des Laboratoires, 435, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-035X(11)71100-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report (2020) Early implementation. Genève, Organisation mondiale de la Santé, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332081</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouchar Mahamat, O., Lounnas, M., Hide, M., Dumont, Y., Tidjani, A., Kamougam, K., Abderrahmane, M., Benavides, J., Solassol, J., Ba&amp;#241;uls, A.L., Jean-Pière, H., Carrière, C. and Godreuil, S. (2019) High Prevalence and Characterization of Extended- Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Chadian Hospitals. BMC Infection Disease, 19, Article No. 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3838-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yandai, F.H., Ndoutamia, G., Bessimbaye, N. and Barro, N. (2019) Prevalence and Resistance Profile of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections in N’Djamena, Chad. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 13, 2065-2073. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v13i4.13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadlaou, B., Mbanga, D., Bakarnga-Via, I., Oualé, C., Barro, N., Tidjani, A. and Ouchemi, C. (2021) Biochemical Profile and Resistance Phenotype of Bacteria Isolated from the Operating Site Departments of the National Reference University Hospital of N’Djamena. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 10, 381-396. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.10.1.0189</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamga, H.G. (2015) Caractérisation phénotypique des souches de Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolées dans la ville de Yaoundé (Cameroun). Journal of Case Reports in Medicine, 4, Article ID: 235908. https://doi.org/10.4303/ajpm/235908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowbury, E.J.L. and Collins, A.G. (1955) The Use of a New Cetrimide Product in a Selective Medium for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 8, 47-48. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.8.1.47</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M., Sherris, J.C. and Turck, M. (1966) Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45, 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of the French Society of Microbiology (EUCAST) (2020) Recommendations, V.1.2.181 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jarlier, V., Nicolas, M.H., Fournier, G. and Philippon, A. (1988) Extended Broad- Spectrum β-Lactamases Conferring Transferable Resistance to Newer β-Lactam Agents in Enterobacteriaceae: Hospital Prevalence and Susceptibility Patterns. Reviews of Infectious Diseases, 10, 867-878. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4454571 https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/10.4.867</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yong, D., Lee, K., Yum, J.H., Shin, H.B., Rossolini, G.M. and Chong, Y. (2002) Imipenem-EDTA Disk Method for Differentiation of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40, 3798-3801. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.10.3798-3801.2002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yasmeen, B.N., Islam, S., Islam, S., Uddin, M.M. and Jahan, R. (2015) Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection, Its Causative Agents and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern: A Study in Northern International Medical College Hospital, Dhaka. Northern International Medical College Journal, 7, 105-109. https://doi.org/10.3329/nimcj.v7i1.25704</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouédraogo/Yugbaré, S.O., Kouéta, F., Dao, L., Minoungou, J., Ouédraogo/Traoré, R., Sanou, I. and Yé, D. (2012) Infection du tractus urinaire chez l’enfant: Aspects épidémiologiques et bactériologiques au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire pédiatrique Charles De Gaulle de Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Mali Médical, 4, 11-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frikh, M., Maleb, A., Nyaledome Ablavi, I., Elouennass, M. and Lemouer, A. (2017) Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Epidémiologie et état actuel des résistances étude rétrospective sur trois ans. Journal Marocain des Sciences Médicales, 21, 34-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qayoom, S., Rashid, A., Kohli, A., Masoodi, T. and Amin, M. (2019) Prevalence and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Respiratory Samples, Pus Samples and Body Fluids in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kashmir. Indian Journal of Microbiology Research, 6, 345-349. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2019.073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shrivastava, G., Bhatambare, G.S. and Patel, K.B. (2014) Evaluation of Prevalence and Antibiogram of Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug Resistant and Pan Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Patients Visiting a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India. CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research, 1, 145-149. https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-3334.138882</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gad, G.F., El-Domany, R.A., Zaki, S. and Ashour, H.M. (2007) Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Clinical and Environmental Samples in Minia, Egypt: Prevalence, Antibiogram and Resistance Mechanisms. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 60, 1010-1017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miltgen (2016) Les entérobactéries. UE8-De l’agent infectieux à l’h&amp;#244;te. http://cdbn.fr/file/frontend/2016/12/Les-Enterobacteries-pdf.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sissoko, M.T. (2006) Infections Urinaires A Bamako: Aspects épidémiologiques, Bactériologiques et Cliniques. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bamako, Bamako, 103 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taale, E., Sanou, S., Sangare, I., Abdelkerim, A.D., Mbatna, A., Sirima, C. and Savadogo, A. (2016) Urinary Tract Infection among Pregnant Women at Bobo-Dioulasso: Epidemiological and Bacteriological Aspects. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8, 1132-1145. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v8i3.26</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Debré, B., Saighi, D. and Peyromaure, M. (2004) Urologie. Masson, Paris, 191 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gastmeier, P., Kampf, G., Wischnewski, N., Hauer, T., Schulgen, G., Schumacher, M., Daschner, F. and Rüden, H. (1998) Prevalence of Nosocomial Infections Inrepresentative German Hospitals. Journal of Hospital Infection, 38, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90173-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mérens, A., Jault, P., Bargues, L. and Cavallo, J.-D. (2012) Infections à Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EMC—Maladies Infectieuses, 30, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1166-8598(12)56974-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ateba, N., Ngaba, G., Ebongue, C.O., Ngassongo, R.O., Tsiagadigui, J.G., Behiya, G., Nguepi, E. and Adiogo, D. (2013) Susceptibility to Colistin of Multi-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated in Douala Laquintinie Hospital, Cameroon. African Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 2, Article ID: 235641. https://doi.org/10.4303/ajpm/235641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndoutamia, G., Fissou, H.Y., Nadjilem, D. and Gatsing, D. (2017) Perception, Knowledge and Use of Antibiotic among Communities in Chad. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 11, 260-265. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP2017.4791</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nasser, M., Gayen, S. and Kharat, A.S. (2020) Prevalence of β-Lactamase and Antibiotic-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Arab Region. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 22, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.01.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Orphaly, M., Hadi, H.A., Eltayeb, F.K., Al-Hail, H., Samuel, B.G., Sultan, A.A. and Skariah, S. (2021) Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Middle East and North Africa Region. Msphere, 6, e00202-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00202-21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Llanes, C., Pourcel, C., Richardot, C., Plésiat, P., Fichant, G., Cavallo, J.-D., Mérens, A., Group, G.S., Vu-Thien, H. and Leclercq, R. (2013) Diversity of β-Lactam resistance Mechanisms in Cystic Fibrosis Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A French Multicentre Study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 68, 1763-1771. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mushi, M.F., Mshana, S.E., Imirzalioglu, C. and Bwanga, F. (2014) Carbapenemase Genes among Multidrug Resistant Gram Negative Clinical Isolates from a Tertiary Hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. BioMed Research International, 2014, Article ID: 303104. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/303104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suwantarat, N. and Carroll, K.C. (2016) Epidemiology and Molecular Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Southeast Asia. Antimicrobial Resistance &amp; Infection Control, 5, Article No. 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0115-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gonsu, K.H., Toukam, M., Sando, Z., Ndifo, N.J.-M., Mbakop, C.D. and Adiogo, D. (2015) Caractérisation phénotypique des souches de Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolées dans la ville de Yaoundé (Cameroun). African Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 4, Article ID: 235908. https://doi.org/10.4303/ajpm/235908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alkasaby, N.M. and El Sayed Zaki, M. (2017) Molecular Study of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates for Metallo-β-Lactamases and Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamases Genes in Intensive Care Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt. International Journal of Microbiology, 2017, Article ID: 3925868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3925868</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jalal, S., Ciofu, O., H	&amp;#248;iby, N., Gotoh, N. and Wretlind, B. (2000) Molecular Mechanisms of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 44, 710-712. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.3.710-712.2000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lister, P.D., Wolter, D.J. and Hanson, N.D. (2009) Antibacterial-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Clinical Impact and Complex Regulation of Chromosomally Encoded Resistance Mechanisms. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 22, 582-610. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00040-09</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anyanwu, M.U., Jaja, I.F., Oguttu, J.W., Jaja, C.J., Chah, K.F. and Shodeinde Shoyinka, V. (2021) Is Africa Ready for Mobile Colistin Resistance Threat? Infection Ecology &amp; Epidemiology, 11, Article 1962781. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2021.1962781</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laudy, A.E., Róg, P., Smolińska-Król, K., &amp;#262;miel, M., S&amp;#322;oczyńska, A., Patzer, J. and Tyski, S. (2017) Prevalence of ESBL-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates in Warsaw, Poland, Detected by Various Phenotypic and Genotypic Methods. PLOS ONE, 12, e0180121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sobouti, B., Khosravi, N., Daneshvar, A., Fallah, S., Moradi, M. and Ghavami, Y. (2015) Prevalence of Beta Lactamase Producing Species of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter in Pediatric Burn Patients. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters, 28, 171-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122673-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altoparlak, U., Aktas, F., Celebi, D., Ozkurt, Z. and Akcay, M.N. (2005) Prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase among Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumanii Isolated from Burn Wounds and in Vitro Activities of Antibiotic Combinations against These Isolates. Burns, 31, 707-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.02.017</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>