<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Computational Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2332-5968</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cc.2023.111002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CC-122606</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Detailed Quantum Mechanical QSAR Analysis of Certain Aminopyrimidoisoquinolinequinones with Anticancer Activity
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mukhtaar</surname><given-names>Qaaed S. Sultan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Osman El-Faki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Inas</surname><given-names>Osman Khojali Mohammed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Azal University for Human Development, Sana’a, Yemen</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Omdurman Islamic University, Omdurman, Sudan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, College of Applied and Industrial Sciences, University of Bahri, Alkadroo, Sudan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A detailed quantum mechanical analysis of electronic disposition of five aminopyrimidoisoquinolinequinones (APIQs) was performed after extraction of this subset of compounds from a larger data set of APIQs via a reported clustering methodology (Elfaki, 
  et al. 2020). Both semi empirical PM3 method and DFT quantum mechanical methods were used to calculate global and local quantum mechanical descriptors (QMDs) to define the electronic environment of these molecules in attempt to rationalize their observed anti-cancer response variability. The biological response is the anticancer activity against human gastric adenocarcenoma (AGS) cell line. The correlation matrix between the calculated global electronic descriptors and biological activity demonstrated that the global dipole moment gives the highest correlation. The local electronic environment was analysed by The Mullikan charges (MC) and Fukui functions for N-5, C-6, C-8 in addition to the N atom of phenylamino side group at C-8. MCs furnished no useful information as each of these atoms had almost identical MC values for all the five compounds with exception of C-6 which gave varied values. Regressing MCs of C-6 against the response traces 60% of the latter variability. As C-6 is an extra annular methyl carbon adjacent to N-5 in isoquinoline residue of APIQ, we reasoned that the chemical reactivities of 4 out of the 5 APIQs might be due to a Chichibabin-type tautomerism implying a possible alkylation aspect in their mechanism of action. The corresponding Fukui functions (
  f<sup>-</sup>, 
  f<sup>+</sup> and 
  f<sup>0</sup>) showed a considerable consistency with the patterns of chemical reactivity exhibited by this small set of APIQs.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>APIQs</kwd><kwd> DFT</kwd><kwd> Semi Empirical PM3</kwd><kwd> Global and Local Quantum Mechanical Descriptors</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Physicochemical properties and structural features of chemical compounds control their biological activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref1">1</xref>] . For example, the ability of a molecule to cross cell membranes or dissolve in fatty tissues is closely related to its lipophilicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref2">2</xref>] . Likewise, ability of a molecule to form stable complexes and/or react with biological molecules is directed by its electronic distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref3">3</xref>] . Quantum mechanical descriptors (QMD) such as the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital ε<sub>HOMO</sub>, the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital ε<sub>LUMO</sub>, electronegativity (χ), hardness (η), softness (S), electrophilicity index (ω) have been used in the elucidation of the chemical reactivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref5">5</xref>]. QMD can be divided into two kinds: global descriptors which describe whole molecule such as electrophilic index and dipole moment and local descriptors which describe parts of molecule such as Mullikan atomic charge and Fukui function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref6">6</xref>]. Density functional theory (DFT) beside semi empirical PM3 method has been used fairly successful in elucidation of molecular properties and chemical reactivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref7">7</xref>]. In the present study, we report a detailed quantum mechanical study of electronic dispositions of five aminopyrimidoisoquinolinequinones (APIQs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref8">8</xref>] which cluster together when a larger data set of congeneric 27 APIQs was subjected regression clustering as previously reported by our group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref9">9</xref>]. Both semi empirical PM3 method and DFT methods were used to calculate several global and local QMDs for these compounds in attempt to rationalize and explain the variability of biological response as a consequence of electronic environment.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Method</title><p>Software:</p><p>Gaussian 5.0.8 was used to draw/optimize of structures and for DFT calculation of Fukui functions basis set 3 - 21 G and B3LYP method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref10">10</xref>]. Arguslab 4 and Molecular Operation Environment (MOE) 2008 softwares were used to calculate Mullikan charge and global descriptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref11">11</xref>]. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 program.</p><p>Data set:</p><p>The biological activity used in the present study is the anticancer activities of compounds 5, 17, 18, 19 and 23 which are extracted from a larger data set through a reported clustering procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref9">9</xref>]. We maintain the original numbering as appeared in the previous paper. The cancer cell line used is human gastric adenocarcenoma (AGS) cell line. Biological response is expressed as the inhibitory concentration of 50% of the subjects IC<sub>50</sub>. The structures and biological activities of the APIQ’s are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the optimized chemical structures of molecules.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Structures and biological responses of APIQs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>1 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>3</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IC<sub>50</sub> (μM)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-MeO-Ph-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Me</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-HO-Ph-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Me</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-MeO-Ph-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Me</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-F-Ph-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Me</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,5-diMeO-Ph-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Global electronic descriptors</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> contains the most significant global electronic descriptors of the five APIQs under study. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the correlation matrix between these descriptors including the response.</p><p>The correlation matrix between the global electronic descriptors and biological activity, demonstrates that the global dipole moment gives the highest correlation. The QSAR equation can be written as the following:</p><p>IC 5 0 = 0.3255   dipo + 1.9086 (1)</p><p>n = 5, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88, s = 4.9, F = 23.8</p><p>It is clear from the data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> that dipole moment explains up to 88% the variability of the response while electrophilicity index explains up to 86%. These two descriptors are collinear (property spaces overlap to the extent of 72%). The unexplained variability by them combined amount to 16%. This could be attributed to communal effect of the rest of descriptors on variability.</p><p>It should be noted that there is a high collinearity between GAP and the electrophilicity index. Molecule 23 has the highest GAP (0.525) with the highest ω (1.731254) whereas molecule 18 has the lowest GAP (0.038) with the lowest ω (0.083993).Thus GAP explains the same variability as ω. GAP is pictorially rendered in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> to get a feel of the cause of partitioning of this particular set of molecules in one and the same cluster.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Global electronic descriptors of the five APIQs molecules</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Comp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>HOMO</sub> (eV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>LUMO</sub> (eV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >η (eV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >s (eV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >χ (eV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GAP (eV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >dip (debye)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ѡ</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.073</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.242</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.619086</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.797</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.846</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.822</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.049628</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.931</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.950</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.772</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038597</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.549</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.464</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112882</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.892</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.902</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.731254</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation matrix among the global electronic descriptors and IC<sub>50</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>HOMO</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>LUMO</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >η</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GAP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >dipole</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ω</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AGS</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>HOMO</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>LUMO</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ƞ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GAP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >dipo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ω</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IC<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Local electronic descriptors</p><p>The local environment may be considered by looking at certain atoms around the molecule. We considered N-5, C-6 and C-8 in addition to the nitrogen atom of phenylamino side group at C-8.</p><p>Using the PM3 semi-empirical method, the value of Mullikan charge MC remain the same for all these atoms except for C-6 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), where a significant linear correlation was discerned (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6) with the logarithm of the IC<sub>50</sub> as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>This shows that this carbon is active in spite of its full valence through its presence in the aromatic ring system in addition to its bonding to methyl group. The reason for this is not far-fetched; The presence of a methyl group adjacent</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Mullikan charges of N-5, C-6, C-8 and N-amino using PM3 method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Comp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N-5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C-6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C-8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N-amino</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1548</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.0002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9978</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4735</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9979</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.477</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.0002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>to the nitrogen of the pyridine part of the chromophore may cause a Chichibabin-type tautomerism to occur in the following manner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref12">12</xref>] :</p><p>This tautomerism imparts a chemical reactivity which traces the variability of the biological activity to the extent of 60%. Moreover, there an additional element to add to the reactivity which the generation of an enamine scaffold in situ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref13">13</xref>]. This opens a whole perspective of chemical reactivity which might even suggest alkylation aspect of the mechanism of action of this particular group of APIQs.</p><p>To get a more accurate picture of the above mentioned argument, we used DFT method to calculate the following Fukui functions: forward Fukui function f<sup>+</sup>, backward Fukui function f<sup>−</sup>and neutral Fukui function f<sup>0</sup> for nucleophilic, electrophilic and radical attacks respectively. These functions are calculated as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref14">14</xref>] :</p><p>For nucleophilic attack:</p><p>f + = q a ( N e l + 1 ) − q a ( N e l ) (2)</p><p>For electrophilic attack:</p><p>f − = q a ( N e l ) − q a ( N e l − 1 ) (3)</p><p>For radical attack:</p><p>f 0 = q a ( N e l + 1 ) − q a ( N e l − 1 ) / 2 (4)</p><p>In these equations q<sub>a</sub> is the atomic charge (evaluated from Mullikan population analysis) at the jth atomic site in the neutral (N), anionic (N + 1) or cationic (N − 1) chemical species. We calculated Fukui function for our 5 APIQs and the results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><p>We correlated Fukui functions for atoms N-5, C-6, C-8 and N-atom of 8-phenylamino side group each with the response. The outcomes (as R<sup>2</sup>) of these correlations are summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>Upon examining the value of R<sup>2</sup> summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, the following remarks could be made:</p><p>&#183; N-5: it is apparent that this atom is prone to nucleophilic attack, i.e., it is an electron deficient atom or an electrophilic site. This is to be expected as tuatomer b generated by Chichibabin-type tautomerism (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) contains a secondary amino group with a free lone pair of electron which could easily</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Calculated Fukui functions for N-5, C-6, C-8 and N-atom of 8-phenylamino side group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Molecules</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >IC<sub>50</sub> (μM)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >C-6</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >C-8</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >N-5</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >N-phenyl</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>0</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>0</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>0</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>0</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.036</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>be protonated to enhance nucleophilic attack as already indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>&#183; C-6: also exhibits similar behavior because of the presence of electrophilic N-5 atom which withdraws electron density from it. Reviewing the value of Fukui functions for the five APIQs shows that compound 5 in which there is no methyl group at C-6 has the highest f<sup>+</sup> value indicative that this position is open to nucleophilic attack to a degree of forming a full-fledge covalent bond, moreover, it is well-known that isoquinoline nucleus undergoes nucleophilic aromatic substitution at position 1 in pyridine ring which correspond to C-6 in isoquinoline [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref15">15</xref>] . While the other four compounds, owing to the covalent bond to the methyl group, might enter into an electrostatic interaction with electron rich center in the receptor. Thus we can say that the enamine in tautomer b (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) is complimentary with an electrophilic pocket in the receptor.</p><p>&#183; C-8: Upon concentrating on C-8 and we notice the R<sup>2</sup> values for f<sup>+</sup> and f<sup>0</sup> = 0.98 and 0.9 respectively. This is easily justifiable by noting that this atom is a part of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl system and may constitute a Michael acceptor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122606-ref16">16</xref>], <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, which represents an electron deficient site. The same electron deficient site is attractive for free radicals which give justification of the high value of f<sup>0</sup>.</p><p>&#183; N-phenyl group: As for the N atom of 8-phenylamino group the R<sup>2</sup> value of f<sup>−</sup> and f<sup>+</sup> of 0.9 and 0.67 respectively may indicate a protonation equilibrium as such (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>):</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The variability in chemical reactivity for present set of APIQ (five molecules) has been studied using global and local descriptors. Dipole moment, as a global descriptor, demonstrated a high correlation with the biological activity. The Mullikan charge for C-6, as a local descriptor, showed that this carbon atom is active in spite of its full valence through its presence in an aromatic ring system in addition to its bonding to a methyl group as presence of methyl group adjacent to the nitrogen of the pyridine part of the chromophore may cause a Chichibabin-type rearrangement. The correlation between IC<sub>50</sub> and Fukui functions for atoms N-5, C-6, C-8 and N-atom of 8-phenylamino side group is consistent with variation in chemical behavior for each atom.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sultan,<sup> </sup>M.Q.S., El-Faki, M.O. and Mohammed, I.O.K. (2023) Detailed Quantum Mechanical QSAR Analysis of Certain Aminopyrimidoisoquinolinequinones with Anticancer Activity. Computational Chemistry, 11, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.4236/cc.2023.111002</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Supplementary Material</title><disp-formula id="scirp.122606-formula3"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1710168x14.png?20230119165916076"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.122606-formula4"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1710168x15.png?20230119165916076"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.122606-formula5"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1710168x16.png?20230119165916076"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.122606-formula6"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1710168x17.png?20230119165916076"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122606-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pathan, S., Ali, S.M. and Shrivastava, M. (2016) Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship and Drug Design: A Review. International Journal of Research in BioSciences, 5, 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Constantinescu, T., Lungu, C.N. and Lung, I. (2019) Lipophilicity as a Central Component of Drug-Like Properties of Chalchones and Flavonoid Derivatives. Molecules, 24, Article No. 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xia, L. and Wang, Q. (2018) QSAR Classification Modeling for Bioactivity of Molecular Structure via SPL-Logsum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, P.P., Sharma, S.B. and Singh, K. (2010) Quantum Chemical and Energy Descriptors Based QSAR Study of Triazine Derivatives. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2, 193-205.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bendjeddou1, A., Abbaz, T., Maache, S., Rehamnia, R., Gouasmia, A.K. and Villemin, D. (2016) Quantum Chemical Descriptors of Some P-Aminophenyl Tetrathiafulvalenes through Density Functional Theory (DFT). Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 9, 18-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horvath, D., Marcou, G. and Varnek, A. (2019) Molecular Descriptors. https://www.BigChem.eu</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahu, V., Sharma, P. and Kumar, A. (2014) Impact of Global and Local Reactivity Descriptors on the Hetero-Diels-Alder Reaction of Enaminothione with Various Electrophiles. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society, 59, 2327-2334. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072014000100019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vásquez, D., Rodríguez, J.A., Theoduloz, C., Calderon, P.B. and Valderrama, J.A. (2010) Studies on Quinones. Part 46. Synthesis and in Vitro Antitumor Evaluation of Aminopyrimidoisoquinolinequinonesq. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 45, 5234-5242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.08.040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elfaki, M.O., Sultan, M.Q.S. and Mohammed, A.I.O.K. (2020) Mechanistic Study of Anticancer Activity of Some Known Aminopyrimido-Isoquinoline-Quinones via QSAR Classification Methodology. Computational Chemistry, 8, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/cc.2020.81001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santos, C.B.R.d., Lobato, C.C., Vieira, J.B., et al. (2013) Evaluation of Quantum Chemical Methods and Basis Sets Applied in the Molecular Modeling of Artemisinin. Computational Molecular Bioscience, 3, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.4236/cmb.2013.33009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmoud, N.F., Mahmoud, W.H. and Mohammed, G.G. (2020) Synthesis, Spectra, MOE and Cytotoxic Studies of Nano Ru(III), Pr(III) and Gd(III) Metal Complexes with New Schiff Base Ligand Based on Dibenzoyl Methane and Anthranilic Acid. Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 34, e5801. https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.5801</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ravat, P. and Baumgarten, M. (2015) Tschitschibabin Type Biradicals: Benzenoid or Quinoid. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17, 983-991. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03522D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuan, M., Chen, X. and Lin, S. (2018) Synthesis the Functionalized Enamine. Progress in Chemistry, 30, 1082-1096.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joshi, D.B. (2016) Chemical Reactivity, Dipole Moment and First Hyperpolarizability of Aristolochic Acid I. Journal of Institute of Science and Technology, 21, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v21i1.16030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, Y.Y. and Liu, S.T. (2022) Preparation of Substituted Pyridines via Coupling of β-Enamine Carbonyls with Rongalite-Application for Synthesis of Terpyridines. Reactions, 3, 415-422. https://doi.org/10.3390/reactions3030029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122606-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manna, C. and Pathak, T. (2017) Michael Acceptor, Masked Aldehyde and Leaving Group in a Single Intermediate: Unorthodox Approach to Enantiopure Saturated Aza-Heterocycles from a Multifunctional Glyco-Substrate. ChemistrySelect, 2, 4021-4027. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201700332</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>