<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2023.141005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-122590</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections: A Public Health Emergency in a Regional Hospital of Northern Benin. A Prospective Observational Pilot Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Montcho</surname><given-names>Adrien Hodonou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bio</surname><given-names>Tamou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sêmêvo</surname><given-names>Romaric Tobome</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thierry</surname><given-names>Hessou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Robert</surname><given-names>Akpata</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Allassan</surname><given-names>Boukari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ulrich</surname><given-names>Parfait Otchoun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Roméo</surname><given-names>Haoudou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gambattista</surname><given-names>Priuli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Salako</surname><given-names>Alexandre Allodé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gildas</surname><given-names>Kedalo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Abbas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Delphin</surname><given-names>Kuassi Mehinto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Roberto</surname><given-names>Caronna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery, Saint Jean de Dieu Hospital Tanguiéta (SJDHT), Tanguiéta, Republic of Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Faculty of Health Sciences, Cotonou, Bénin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery, Regional University Hospital of Borgou, Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou, Republic of Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Roma, Roma, Italy</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Office of The Sanitary Zone of Kouandé-Kérou-Péhunco, Kouandé, Republic of Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Bordeaux, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>38</fpage><lpage>45</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are considered as result of the
   healthcare quality in hospitals. Objective: to study SSI at Saint Jean de Dieu Hospital Tanguieta (SJDHT), prior to the implementation of a permanent monitoring system. Method: transversal, and descriptive study with prospective data collection was performed from 1 July to 31
   
  janvier 2017 in the department of general surgery of SJDHT. The hospital lacks in a microbiology unit. All patients who underwent surgery during this period were included and the monitoring lasted one month. SSIs diagnostic was carried out according to WHO criteria as described in the Practical Guide for the Prevention of Nosocomial Infections published in 2002. Statistical tests (χ-square and Student’s t-test) were applied and p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.05 were statistically significant. Results: Of 343 patients recorded, 105 (30.6%) had SSI. Their age averaged 40.3 years and the sex-ratio (men/women) was 2.8. The emergency surgery resulted in a 50.0% rate of SSI (p = 0.00). The SSI rate for clean and clean-contaminated surgery was 6.3% against 94.6% for infected surgery (p = 0.00). The SSI rates were 100% and 66.7% for NNISS = 2 and NNISS = 1 (p = 0.00), respectively. Superficial SSI rate was 13.3%, while deep SSI and organ/space SSI were 46.7% and 40%, respectively. The hospital stay of patients with SSI was three times longer than the length of patients without SSI (p = 0.00). Conclusion:
   SSIs are real burden at SJDHT. Appropriate measures must be adopted to reduce its prevalence.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Surgical Site Infection</kwd><kwd> Class of Surgery</kwd><kwd> Emergency</kwd><kwd> Benin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Healthcare-associated infections (HAI), especially surgical site infections (SSI), are considered as a result of the healthcare quality in hospitals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref2">2</xref>]. SSI are a frequent cause of HAI in low- and middle-income countries, and their burden in Africa is particularly high [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref5">5</xref>]. The additional cost and load of SSIs are as heavy for LIMCs as they are for developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref6">6</xref>]. But in Benin as well as several developing countries, there is a lack of well-informed national basic data. We also notice that these infections remain the cause of prolonged admission days of patients and besides their care, while most of these patients have no health insurance cover [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>The aim of this pilot study is to assess the epidemiology of the SSI at Saint John of God Hospital Tangui&#233;ta (SJDHT) prior to the implementation of a permanent monitoring system adapted to local settings and in order to contribute to the reduction of the incidence of this public health problem.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>This was a retrospective cohort study carried out in the Department of General Surgery of SJDHT (north-west of Benin) from 1 July 2016 to 31 January 2017. SJDHT receives an average of 19,000 patients each year. The Department of General Surgery has 62 beds and admits patients from 15 years old or older. The SJDHT lacks in a microbiology laboratory. The study population consisted of all patients admitted in the Department of General Surgery after a surgical operation from July to December 2016. However patient follow-up continued up to January 2017 for those operated in December 2016. The data collected included age, gender, admission and surgery dates, main intervention and operator, US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) score [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref5">5</xref>], surgical class according to the classification of “Manual on control of infection in surgical patients” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref7">7</xref>], duration of the operation compared to the 75th percentile of the standard set by the NNIS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref8">8</xref>], whether or not SSI occurred, date of occurrence of SSI, date of discharge from hospital, length of antibiotic therapy. For each patient, the surgical wound was monitored by surgeons for one month in accordance with NNIS definitions. When SSI was diagnosed, specific data on the patient with SSI was then collected. Due to the local setting with limited resources and the lack of technical facilities, the diagnostic criteria used are those simplified for the monitoring of the SSIs published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Practical Guide for the Prevention of Nosocomial Infections in 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref9">9</xref>]. For this study, we considered as SSI, any purulent discharge, abscess or cellulitis occurring on the surgical site within one month following surgery.</p><p>When it occurred, the infection was classified as superficial (involving the skin and the subcutaneous tissue), or deep (affecting soft tissues such as fascia and muscles) or organ/space (affecting an organ or a space of the surgical site) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>An individual data collection form was designed and annexed to each patient’s medical record. It was filled as monitoring continued and was removed after one month of postoperative monitoring. Data was recorded and analyzed using the Epi info 7 software. For statistical testing, χ-square and Student’s t-test were performed with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant.</p><p>As this study was considered to be the first step of a quality improvement project, no ethical approval was deemed necessary.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><p>From 1 July to 31 December 2016, 343 patients underwent surgery in the Department of General Surgery of SJDHT. The mean age of the patients with SSI was 40.3 &#177; 16.6 years. The youngest was 16 and the oldest 65 years old. The sex ratio (male/female) was 2.8. The mean time prior to admission to the operating room for patients with SSI was 23.6 &#177; 23.1 hours versus 29.3 &#177; 27.4 hours for patients without SS (p = 0.48). Emergency surgery resulted in a 50.0% rate of SSI (49 out of 98 patients in emergency surgery), while among the 245 patients with non-emergency surgery, 56 (22.9%) developed SSI (p = 0.000, Risk Ratio = 2.2; confidence interval = [1.6, 3.0]). The most common surgical interventions were: laparotomy (28 cases, 26.7%), limb fracture osteosynthesis (21 cases, 20.0%), prostate adenomectomy by transvesical procedure (14 cases, 13.3%). Characteristics of all patients by variables are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Overall, out of 343 patients, 105 (30.6%) were found to develop SSI. In terms of the NNIS Risk Index variables (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 1or 2 in 77/301 patients (25.6%) and 3 or more in 28/42 (66.7%) (p value = 0.000, Risk Ratio = 2.6; confidence interval = [1.9, 3.5]). Of the 343 patients monitored, 112 were operated on clean or clean-contaminated surgery and 7 (6.2%) had SSI, 231 patients had been operated on contaminated surgery or dirty/infected surgery, of whom 98 (42.4%) presented SSI (p value = 0.000; Risk Ratio = 6.8; confidence interval = [3.3, 14.1]). For 14 patients, the operation length had exceeded the normal limit (p value = 0.02, Risk Ratio = 1.73; confidence interval = [1.15; 2.60]). Combining the information for these variables in the standard NNIS Risk Index model, these three variables were highly predictive of the occurrence of SSI. All 35 patients in whom the NNIS was 2 developed SSI; whilst 70/105 (66.7%) of patients in whom the NNIS was 1 developed SSI; none of the remaining 203 patients with NNIS 0 developed SSI (p value = 0.000).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of all patients according SSI (343 patients, 1 July 2016 to 31 January 2017, Department of General Surgery of SJDHT)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Surgical Site Infection</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Operation procedure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105 (30.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238 (69.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masculin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 (24.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168 (49.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F&#233;minin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (6.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (20.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (12.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (12.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (16.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189 (55.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical interventions according to each procedure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Laparotomy for peritonitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (93.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Osteosynthesis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (33.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (66.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ad&#233;nomectomy tansvesical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (40.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (60.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amputation of limb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (44.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (55.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#233;questrestomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (37.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (62.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extraction of osteosynthesis material</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (25.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (75.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mastectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (26.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (73.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (3.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98 (96.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASA Score</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (8.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 (40.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 (24.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (8.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (4.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Class of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (20.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clean-contaminated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5(1.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (10.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contaminated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (8.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129 (37.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dirty/infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (20.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (1.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duration of surgery exceeded</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (4.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 (26.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224 (65.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NNIS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203 (59.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (20.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (10.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (10.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00 (0.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SSI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Superficial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deep</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (46.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organe/space</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (40.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of patients according to NNIS items of SSI risk factors (343 patients, 1 July 2016 to 31 January 2017, Department of General Surgery of SJDHT)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Surgical Site Infection n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Risk Ratio [IC95%]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASA Score</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6 [1.9, 3.5]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 or 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77 (25.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224 (74.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (66.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (33.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Class of Surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8 [3.3, 14.1]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clean or Clean-contiminated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (6.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105 (93.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contaminated or Durty/Infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98 (42.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133 (57.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Long operating time</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 [1.1, 2.6]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (5.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 (26.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218 (63.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*significant.</p><p>The distribution of the SSI cases according to their location is as follows: superficial: 14 (13.3%); deep: 49 (46.7%); organ/space: 42 (40.0%). The mean interval time prior to occurrence of SSI was 4.2 &#177; 1.6 days with extremes of 2 and 7 days. The mean duration of antibiotic therapy for the 105 patients with SSI was 19.1 &#177; 7.6 days with extremes of 8 and 36 days. The mean hospital stay length of patients with SSI was 16.2 &#177; 7.2 days with extremes of 9 and 32 days, and this was three times longer than the mean stay length of patients without SSI: 5.6 &#177; 2.0 days (p value = 0.000, t = 5.7).</p><p>Five deaths were recorded among 105 patients with SSI. The mortality due to surgical site infection in this study was 4.8%. These are patients operated for generalized acute peritonitis with an ASA score of 3 who died in a context of sepsis within an average of 6 days after surgery.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>SSI occurs at an alarming rate in SJDHT, occurring in almost a third of surgical patients. This incidence was similar to that reported in other LMIC countries such as India (30.7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref11">11</xref>] and Peru (26.7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref12">12</xref>]. Falcon study held in several income countries occurred with a mean rate of 22.0% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref13">13</xref>]. However, these rates were widely higher than those observed in most of the countries where there was control and surveillance system of nosocomial infections as a whole and SSI in particular [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref16">16</xref>]. In addition to the lack of surveillance of SSI in our context, the severe clinical condition of operated patients, and delay in consultation may explain this high rate of SSI. It was often contaminated surgery or dirty/infected surgery (laparotomies for peritonitis and open fractures of bones) with high ASA score. In fact, 231 patients out 343 (67.3%) have been operated for contaminated or dirty/infected surgery, as evidenced by the 42.4% of SSI in their group. This study reveals that SJDHT, emergency and dirty surgery is the most common. 42 patients had bad ASA score (3 to 5) and 71.4% have developed SSI. Let’s also underline the urgent character of the third party (26.8%) to the whole surgical procedures often incriminated in the occurrence of SSI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref17">17</xref>]. Patients with an ASA score ≥ 3, a dirty wound, as well as a long duration of surgical intervention are respectively 2.6, 6.8 and 3.6 times more at risk of SSI. NNIS is proportionally at risk of SSI as reported in several studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref19">19</xref>]. The SSI rate of organ/space got during this study retains (40%) attention. Many factors might explain this high rate as the main cause of the surgery which often was a deep infection (peritonitis and open fracture). Rosenthal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref20">20</xref>] as well as Walter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref1">1</xref>] reported in their studies this type of SSI as more frequent.</p><p>The important limitation of this pilot study was the lack of identification of bacteria involved their antibiotic susceptibilities. This is because of the absence microbiology unit at the SJDHT. The microbial environment is poorly understood. A further study will be necessary after the installation of microbiology unit not only to know the microbial environment of the surgery but also to identify the germs involved in SSI and adapted antibiotics. However, a study carried out in a department of Borgou of a Teaching Hospital still in the northern part of the country highlights the importance of multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and emphasizes the importance of developing protocols for antibiotics use during the perioperative period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122590-ref21">21</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>SSI is frequent in General Surgery at the SJDHT and often affects patients who are forty years old and operated on the abdomen or for fracture of limbs with an NNIS score 1 or higher. It is discovered on the 4th postoperative day and is associated with a long duration of hospitalization and a long empirical antibiotic therapy. NNIS score should be calculated and recorded for each patient at the end of each surgical procedure to allow adequate monitoring of high-risk patients. The implementation of a “simplified” SSI monitoring system is therefore an urgent matter for the SJDHT in view of the public health challenge set by this situation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Dr Alex Aiken (London School of Hygiene &amp;Tropical Medicine), Dr Mohamed Abas (Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland) for advice on preparation of the manuscript and the staff working in Department of General Surgery of SJGHT.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Availability of Data and Materials</title><p>The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hodonou, M.A., Tamou, B., Tobome, S.R., Hessou, T., Akpata, R., Boukari, A., Otchoun, U.P., Haoudou, R., Priuli, G., Allod&#233;, S.A., Kedalo, G., Abbas, M., Mehinto, D.K. and Caronna, R. (2023) Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections: A Public Health Emergency in a Regional Hospital of Northern Benin. A Prospective Observational Pilot Study. Surgical Science, 14, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2023.141005</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Abbreviations</title><p>ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; CDC: Centres for Diseases Control and prevention; HAI: Healthcare-Associated Infections; LMIC: Lower and middle-income country; NNIS: US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance; SJDHT: Saint Jean de Dieu Hospital of Tangui&#233;ta; SSI: Surgical Site Infection.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122590-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walter, P.W., Marcel, Z., Stefan, R., et al. (2008) Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infections at a European University Hospital. Infection Control &amp; Hospital Epidemiology, 29, 623-629.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Satyanarayana, V., Prashanth, H.V., Basavaraj, B. and Kavyashree, A.N. (2011) Study of Surgical Site Infections in Abdominal Surgeries. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 29, 935-939.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aiken, A.M., Wanyoro, A.K., Mwangi, J., et al. (2013) Evaluation of Surveillance for Surgical Site Infections in Thika Hospital, Kenya. Journal of Hospital Infection, 83, 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2012.11.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allegranzi, B., Bagheri Nejad, S., Combescure, C., et al. (2011) Burden of Endemic Health-Care-Associated Infection in Developing Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Lancet, 377, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bagheri Nejad, S., Allegranzi, B., Syed, S.B., et al. (2011) Health-Care-Associated Infection in Africa: A Systematic Review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89, 757-765. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.088179</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monahan, M., Jowett, S., Pinkney, T., et al. (2020) Surgical Site Infection and Cost in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Economic Burden. PLOS ONE, 15, e0232960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232960</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hodonou, M.A., Allod&amp;#233, S.A., Tobome, S.R., Hounkponou, A.F., et al. (2017) Epidemiological Aspects of Surgical Site Infections in an Income Country: The Case of Regional Hospital Center, Borgou (Benin). International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 6, 29-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horan, T.C. andrus, M. and Dudeck, M.A. (2008) CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definition of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Criteria for Specific Types of Infections in the Acute Care Setting. American Journal of Infection Control, 36, 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altemeier, W.A., Burke, J.F., Puitt, B.A. and Sandusky, W.R. (1984) Manual on Control of Infection in Surgical Patients. 2rd Edition, JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, 29 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Culver, D.H., Horan, T.C., Gaynes, R.P., et al. (1991) Surgical Wound Infection Rates by Wound Class, Operative Procedure, and Patient Risk Index. The American Journal of Medicine, 91, S152-S157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-Z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2008) Pr&amp;#233vention des infections nosocomiales: guide pratique. 2nd. ed., Organisationmondiale de la Sant&amp;#233. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69751</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horan, T.C., Gaynes, R.P., Martone, W.J., et al. (1992) CDC Definitions of Nosocomial Surgical Site Infections, 1992: A Modification of CDC Definitions of Surgical Wound Infections. Infection Control &amp; Hospital Epidemiology, 13, 606-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/30148464</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NIHR Global Research Health Unit on Global Surgery (2021) Reducing Surgical Site Infection in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries (FALCON): A Pragmatic, Multicentre, Stratified, Randomized Controlled Trial. The Lancet, 398, 1687-1699.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Umesh, S.K., Fereirra, A.M.A., Kulkarni, M.S. and Motghare, D.D. (2008) A Prospective Study of Surgical Site Infections in a Teaching Hospital in Goa. Indian Journal of Surgery, 70, 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-008-0031-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernandez, K., Elizabeth, R., Carlos, S., et al. (2005) Incidence of and Risk Factors for Surgical-Site Infections in a Peruvian Hospital. Infection Control &amp; Hospital Epidemiology, 26, 473-477. https://doi.org/10.1086/502570</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Surveillance des infections du site op&amp;#233ratoire dans les &amp;#233tablissements de sant&amp;#233fran&amp;#231ais. R&amp;#233sultats 2016. Saint-Maurice (Fra) :Sant&amp;#233publique France, f&amp;#233vrier 2018, 223 p. https://www.invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van der Kooi, T.I., Manni&amp;#235n, J., Wille, J.C. and van Benthem, B.H.B. (2010) Prevalence of Nosocomiol Infections in the Netherlands, 2007-2008: Results of the First Four National Studies. Journal of Hospital Infection, 75, 168-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.11.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oni, A.A., Ewete, A.F., Gbadja, A.T., et al. (2006) Nosocomial Infections: Surgical Site Infection in UCH Ibadan (Nigeria). Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research, 8, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.4314/njsr.v8i1.54850</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akoko, L.O., Mwanga, A.H., Fredrick, F. and Mbambati, N.M. (2012) Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infection at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. East and Central African Journal of Surgery, 17, 12-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenthal, R., Weber, P., Marti, W.R., et al. (2010) Surveillance of Surgical Site Infection by Surgeons: Biaised Underreporting or Useful Epidemiological Data? Journal of Hospital Infection, 75, 178-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.10.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122590-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hodonou, M.A., Hounkponou, F., Allod&amp;#233, S.A., Tobome, S.R., et al. (2016) Aspects Bact&amp;#233riologiques des Inections du site op&amp;#233ratoire au Centre Hospitalier D&amp;#233partemental du Borgou &amp;#224 Parakou (B&amp;#233nin). European Scientific Journal, 12, 353-360. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n9p353</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>