<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CRCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Case Reports in Clinical Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2325-7075</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/crcm.2023.121003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CRCM-122512</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Previable Premature Rupture of Membranes in Dichorionic Diamniotic Twin Gestation, Loss of Leading Twin, Emergency Cervical Cerclage and Ceaserean Delivery at Term
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Darlington-Peter</surname><given-names>Chibuzor Ugoji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ugochukwu</surname><given-names>Sunday Julius Ezenyirioha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ifeanyichukwu</surname><given-names>Jude Ofor</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chukwuemeka</surname><given-names>Joseph Nwoye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>God’s</surname><given-names>Miracle David Banso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sunday</surname><given-names>Emmanuel Ucha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ugochi</surname><given-names>Chimerem Ugoji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Enugu State University College of Medicine, Parklane, Enugu State, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Julius Ezenyirioha Memorial Hospital and Maternity, Abakpa Nike, Enugu State, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>School of Nursing, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, 
Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Multiple pregnancies have a higher risk of premature delivery and a weakened cervix has been associated with it. In most cases, emergency cerclage has proved to be beneficial as the birth of the first twin is usually followed by the unavoidable delivery of the second twin and most fetus dies shortly after delivery. Studies have noted that delayed delivery of the second fetus in a twin pregnancy is an effective management choice and the use of cervical cerclage after the first delivery is associated with a longer inter-delivery interval. We present a case of previable premature rupture of membrane of a dichorionic diamniotic twin gestation leading to the loss of the leading twin and subsequently having emergency cervical cerclage for the second twin and caesarean delivery at term. 
  Case Presentation: She was a case of a 29 years old, G
  <sub>6</sub>P
  <sub>1</sub>
  <sup>+4</sup> with 1 living child at a gestational age of 17 weeks plus 5 days who initially was diagnosed with dichorionic diamniotic twin gestation following an early ultrasound but presented with a history of bleeding and passage of liquor per vaginam. Ultrasound done on admission showed cervical funneling and a stable state of the second twin. She subsequently had emergency cervical cerclage after stabilization on account of previable premature rupture of membrane of a dichorionic diamniotic twin gestation with the loss of the leading twin. A repeat ultrasound done prior to discharge showed closed cervical os and a good state of the fetus. She then had elective caesarean delivery at term with a good feto-maternal outcome. 
  Conclusion: Emergency cervical cerclage should be part of the options of management after stabilization in cases of previable premature rupture of membrane in a dichorionic or multichoronic gestation so as to save the viable once.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Previable Premature Rupture of Membrane</kwd><kwd> Cervical Cerclage</kwd><kwd> Twin Gestation</kwd><kwd> Multiple Gestation</kwd><kwd> Multiple Pregnancy</kwd><kwd> Twin</kwd><kwd> Preterm Delivery</kwd><kwd> Cervical Incompetence</kwd><kwd> Cerclage</kwd><kwd> Interval Delivery</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Twin gestations are at an increased risk of premature delivery and may be due to a weakened cervix ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref3">3</xref>]). Preterm birth is a major cause of perinatal mortality and long-term morbidity and multiple gestations account for 20% of preterm births ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref5">5</xref>]). Recurrent premature delivery occurs in 50% - 60% of women with prior premature delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref6">6</xref>]. However, emergency cerclage placement in multiple gestations has been noted to reduce infant mortality by 77% for patients whose babies had a better chance of surviving preterm birth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>There are 2 main approaches in the management of a weakened cervix in pregnancy: Conservative approaches were that you do nothing and application of cerclage, but this latter use is controversial ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref2">2</xref>]). There are three main indications for cervical cerclage: histories of cervical incompetence, recurrent mid-trimester pregnancy loss and preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes prior to 34 weeks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref5">5</xref>]. Emergency cerclage in a pre-viable pregnancy at extremely high risk of birth is even more controversial but recent data suggest that multiple pregnancies may fare as well as singleton pregnancies in this situation and that overall benefit is seen ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref7">7</xref>]).</p><p>The birth of the first twin is usually followed by the unavoidable delivery of the second twin and in case of immature birth, most fetus dies shortly after delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref8">8</xref>]. In selected cases, when one fetus is delivered vaginally very prematurely, the remaining fetus can be retained in utero to hope for a delayed-interval delivery which may improve neonatal survival and decrease neonatal morbidity ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref11">11</xref>]). The first report of delaying the delivery of a second twin by 44 days was by Carson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref11">11</xref>]. After that first observation, sporadic cases were published, in which a wait-and-see attitude was adopted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref10">10</xref>]. However, Thomsen’s paper in 1978 marked the change in the obstetric with the employment of tocolytic, cerclage and prophylactic antibiotics, in twin preterm premature rupture of membrane management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref12">12</xref>]. Enakpenes et al. noted that the rate of preterm birth was lower in patients who receive prophylactic antibiotics and tocolytic than in women who did not prior to cerclage insertion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Studies noted that delayed delivery of the second fetus in a twin pregnancy is an effective management choice and the use of cervical cerclage after the first delivery is associated with a longer inter-delivery interval ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref16">16</xref>]). Namouz et al. noted that cerclage insertion did significantly better than bed rest in mean randomization-to-delivery interval, preterm delivery before 34 weeks, and compound neonatal morbidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref17">17</xref>]. It is on this note that we decided to publish this rare case success to add to available knowledge.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Case Presentation</title><p>Mrs. O.O was a 29 years old G<sub>6</sub>P<sub>1</sub><sup>+4</sup> with 1 living child, who is from Igbo tribe but resides at Enugu State Nigeria. She presented to our facility on 27/9/2021 with a last menstrual period of 23/5/2021, expected date of delivery of 30/2/2022 and gestational age of 17 week plus 4 days. An early ultrasound result [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>] done in our facility at gestational age of 6 weeks plus 3 days which she came with showed dichorionic diamniotic gestation. Before then, she was regular with her routine antenatal care and all visits were uneventful. She complained of history of bleeding and drainage of liquor per vaginam of 3 hours duration. It was sudden and unprovoked. There was history of successive 4 previous pregnancies that ended up in complete abortions at 25 weeks, 23 weeks, 20 weeks and 19 weeks respectively in the last 5 years. There was no history of fever, trauma to the abdomen, abnormal vaginal discharge, urinary symptoms or lower abdominal pain. General examination was satisfactory with stable vital signs. Abdominal examination showed an 18 weeks uterine size with no tenderness and no contractions. Pelvic examination with speculum showed liquor in the posterior fornix, no other abnormality noted. There was no active bleeding. Cervix was open</p><p>with the leading fetal limbs dangling out of the external cervical os. Delivery of the leading twin and its placenta was done and complete gently. She was admitted into the ward and placed on antibiotics, bed rest and tocolytic while in head down position. Pelvic ultrasound done 24 hours later [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>] showed live singleton fetus with adequate liquor for gestational age, cervical Os was intact, 1.2 cm long, closed with an internal os funneling at 18 weeks gestational age. RVST, HbSAg, HCV and VDRL were negative. Her PCV was 30%, blood group was O Rhesus D+ and Genotype was AA. She was managed as a case of previable premature rupture of membrane on background cervical incompetence and worked up for emergency Cerclage. She subsequently had successful McDonalds Cerclage insertion 3 days later while on admission. Findings were: normal vulva</p><p>vagina, cervix was 60% effaced and about 1.5 cm dilated, there was mucous discharge covering the cervical os, no traces of blood was seen, the cord, placenta and membranes were not seen and there was no fluid collection in the posterior fornix. She was placed on antibiotics for 4 weeks (intravenous augmentin 1.2 g twice daily for 1 week, then orally for 3 weeks; intravenous metronidazole 500 mg thrice daily for 1 week, then orally for 3 weeks), tablet Drotaverine 80 mg tds for 1 week, tablet Duphaston 10 mg bd for 4 weeks and bed rest in the hospital for 3 days before discharge. In the course of her hospital stay, she was stable, no bleeding and no drainage of liquor and no evidence of pelvic infection prior to discharge. Repeat pelvic ultrasound after 5 weeks [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>] showed live singleton pregnancy with adequate liquor for gestational age; the cervical os was intact</p><p>and closed at 23 week gestational age. She continued antenatal clinic 2 weekly till 36 weeks and weekly till 38 weeks. During the antenatal period she was only on routine hematinics and took antenatal prophylaxis. She was booked and subsequently had cervical Cerclage removal and elective caesarean section at 38 weeks on account of cervical incompetence with bad obstetric history at term. Intraoperative findings were: clean peritoneal cavity, well formed lower uterine segment, normally looking tubes and ovaries, a life male neonate weight 3.6 kg and APGAR score of 9<sup>1</sup>, 10<sup>5</sup>, estimated blood loose was 500 mls. She was discharged home on the third day postoperative in good clinical condition. She was seen at 2 weeks and 6 weeks post natal clinic and both baby and mother did well. She subsequently had intrauterine contraceptive device inserted at 6<sup>th</sup> week post partum and discharged from clinic.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion</title><p>Our case was a case of dichorionic diamniotic twin gestations that had preterm premature rupture of membrane at 17 weeks with delivery of the leading twin and its placenta. Emergency cerclage was placed to save the second twin; pregnancy was carried to term averting preterm birth and associated morbidities. This collaborated a study that noted that emergency cerclage placement in multiple gestation reduced infant mortality by 77% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Cerclage was placed after stabilization as patient had history of recurrent midtrimester pregnancy loses and preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes. This corresponded to studies that noted emergency cerclage insertion as a management option ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref2">2</xref>]) and histories of recurrent midtrimester pregnancy loses and preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes prior to 34 weeks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref5">5</xref>] as indications for preterm premature rupture of membrane with viable cyesis in twin gestation. Emergency cerclage in a pre-viable pregnancy is even more controversial but recent data suggest, that multiple pregnancies may fare as well as singleton pregnancies in this situation and that overall benefit is seen ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref7">7</xref>]). This was evident as our case recorded a significant success.</p><p>The birth of the first twin is usually followed by the unavoidable delivery of the second twin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref8">8</xref>], however in our case, the use of cerclage saved the second twin. In selected cases, when one fetus is delivered vaginally very prematurely, the remaining fetus can be retained in utero to hope for a delayed-interval delivery which may improve neonatal survival and decrease neonatal morbidity ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref10">10</xref>]). We delayed delivery of the second twin that lead to its survival without any morbidity. Several studies recorded success with use of tocolytic, cerclage and prophylactic antibiotics ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref16">16</xref>]) as was observed in our index case leading to the success we are reporting. Namouz et al. noted that cerclage insertion did significantly better than bed-rest in mean randomization-to-delivery interval, preterm delivery before 34 weeks, and compound neonatal morbidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122512-ref17">17</xref>]. It was on these bases that our patient was discharged home after stabilization and cerclage insertion and we had good success without strict bed after discharge.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Emergency cervical cerclage should be part of the options of management after stabilization in cases of previable premature rupture of membrane in a dichorionic or multichoronic gestation so as to save the viable twin.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Consent</title><p>Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor-in-chief of this journal.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ugoji, D.-P.C., Ezenyirioha, U.S.J., Ofor, I.J., Nwoye, C.J., Banso, G.M.D., Ucha, S.E. and Ugoji, U.C. (2023) Previable Premature Rupture of Membranes in Dichorionic Diamniotic Twin Gestation, Loss of Leading Twin, Emergency Cervical Cerclage and Ceaserean Delivery at Term. Case Reports in Clinical Medicine, 12, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.4236/crcm.2023.121003</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122512-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wierzchowska-Opoka, M., Kimber-Trojnar, Z. and Bo&amp;#380;ena Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2021) Emergency Cervical Cerclage. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10, 1270. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cenk, S.H., Sutcu, C.&amp;#304;., Selen, E.C. and Yener, F.V. (2018) Emergency Cerclage in Twins during Mid Gestation May Have Favorable Outcomes: Results of a Retrospective Cohort. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 47, 451-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.08.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duryea, E. (2021) Cerclage May Reduce the Risk of Premature Labor in Some Twin Pregnancies. Your Pregnancy Matters. MedBlog.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Georgina, D.F., Vera, D. and Lawrence, W.M.I. (2021) Emergency Cervical Cerclage in Twin and Singleton Pregnancies with 0 mm Cervical Length or Prolapsed Membranes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100, 2003-2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Enakpene, C.A., Dijeh, F.C., Vengalil, E.T. and Mastrogiannis, D. (2020) An Overview of the Role of Cerclage in the Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Journal of Reproductive Medicine Gynaecology &amp; Obstetrics, 5, 48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meis, P.J., Klebanoff, M., Thom, E., et al. (2003) Prevention of Recurrent Preterm Delivery by 17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 2379-2385. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WuJ-Denoble, A.E., Kuller, J.A. and Dotters-Katz, S.K. (2021) Management of Cerclage in Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. Obstetrical &amp; Gynecological Survey, 76, 681-691. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000957</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Platt, J.S. and Rosa, C. (1999) Delayed Interval Delivery in Multiple Gestations. Obstetrical &amp; Gynecological Survey, 54, 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199905000-00025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cristinelli, S., Fresson, J. andré, M., et al. (2005) Management of Delayed-Interval Delivery in Multiple Gestations. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 20, 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1159/000085087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Climent, L.S., Sarmiento, I.L., Escartín, M.J.P., et al. (2019) Beating the Record: 157 Days of Delayed Delivery of the Second Fetus in a Twin Pregnancy. Case Reports in Obstetrics, Gynecology &amp; Reproductive, 2, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.31487/j.CROGR.2020.01.06</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carson, J.L. (1880) Twins Born with an Interval of Forty-Four Days. BMJ, 1, 242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thomsen</surname><given-names> R.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1978</year>)<article-title>Delayed Interval Delivery of a Twin Pregnancy</article-title><source> Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</source><volume> 52</volume>,<fpage> 37S</fpage>-<lpage>40S</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Egbe, T.O., Njamen, T.N., Ekane, G.H., et al. (2013) Outcome of Late Second Trimester Emergency Cerclage in Patients with Advanced Cervical Dilatation with Bulging Amniotic Membranes: A Report of Six Cases Managed at the Douala General Hospital, Cameroon. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2013, Article ID: 843158. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/843158</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, L., Chen, H., Chen, L., et al. (2015) Effects of Emergency Cervical Cerclage on Pregnancy Outcome: A Retrospective Study of 158 Cases. Medical Science Monitor, 21, 1395-1401. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.893244</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jenkins, T.M., Berghella, V., Shlossman, P.A., et al. (2000) Timing of Cerclage Removal after Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 183, 847-852. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.109039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kominiarek, M.A. and Kemp, A. (2006) Perinatal Outcome in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes at &lt; or = 32 Weeks with Retained Cerclage. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 51, 533-538.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122512-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Namouz, S., Porat, S., Okun, N., et al. (2013) Emergency Cerclage: Literature Review. Obstetrical &amp; Gynecological Survey, 68, 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e31828737c7</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>