<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Entomology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2331-1991</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ae.2023.111002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AE-122307</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Preliminary Study of Predation Effectiveness of the Assassin Bug &lt;i&gt;Rhynocoris rapax&lt;/i&gt; Stal (Heteroptra: Reduviidae) on Fall Armyworm &lt;i&gt;Spodoptera frugiperda&lt;/i&gt; Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a Major Pest of Maize Crops
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Assiénin</surname><given-names>Hauverset N’Guessan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brice</surname><given-names>Sidoine Essis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Achi</surname><given-names>Laurent N’cho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hugues</surname><given-names>Annicet N’da</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouamé</surname><given-names>Jean-Noël Konan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’Guessan</surname><given-names>Alphonse Kouassi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>National Centre for Agronomy Research, Research Station of La Mé, Plant Breeding Laboratory, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>National Centre for Agronomy Research, Research Station of La Mé, Soil Science Laboratory, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>National Centre for Agronomy Research, Food Crops Research Station, Laboratory of Phytopathology, Bouaké, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>National Centre for Agronomy Research, Research Station of La Mé, Laboratory of Entomology, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>National Centre for Agronomy Research, Research Station of Maize, Millet and Sorghum, Plant Breeding Laboratory, 
Ferkessédougou, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>National Centre for Agronomy Research, Research Station of Maize, Millet and Sorghum, Laboratory of Phytopathology, 
Ferkessédougou, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Maize is a staple food in many sub-Saharan African countries, grown on large surfaces and with high production. However, maize’s cultivation is often confronted with attacks by the fall armyworm, which considerably reduces production. Thus, the use of biological agents in the control of the fall armyworm would contribute effectively to the sustainability of agriculture. It is in this context that this study, conducted at the La M&#233; station of the National Centre for Agronomy Research, aims to test the effectiveness of 
  Rhynocoris rapax, a powerful predator of various insect families, on the fall armyworm 
  Spodoptera frugiperda, for biological control of this maize pest in C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Therefore, 3 batches of 1 adult individuals of 
  Rhynocoris rapax were captured in trial plots set up at the La M&#233; station. These individuals were then put in contact with 3 batches of 5, 20 and 40 larvae of the pest in rearing boxes at an average temperature of 26.4&#176;C and an average relative humidity of 60%, in order to evaluate the efficiency of the predation. The results showed that 
  Rhynocoris rapax kills more larvae when these are in large numbers. The mortality of the high number of larvae was observed during the first three days, probably due to the voracity and aggressiveness of 
  Rhynocoris rapax that period. So 
  R. rapax is a potential predator of fall armyworm and should be protected.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Effectiveness</kwd><kwd> Predation</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Rhynocoris rapax&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Spodoptera frugiperda&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Maize</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>With an average annual production of about 817 million tons in 2009, maize is the most widely grown cereal before wheat (681 million tons) and rice (678 million) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref1">1</xref>] . In Africa, maize is a major staple food consumed by populations with diverse preferences and socio-economic backgrounds in sub-Saharan Africa. For that, it is grown in diverse agro-ecological zones and farming systems on an area of 34,075,972 ha with an average production of 70,076,591 tons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref2">2</xref>] . In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, maize is the second most cultivated cereal after rice. Its annual national production is about 654,738 tones, for a total harvest area of 327,800 ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref3">3</xref>] . Despite the many advantages of maize, its cultivation is confronted with several attacks by insect pests that have a negative impact not only on nutritional quality, but also on yield. These include the corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis H&#252;bner (Lepidoptera: Crambid&#230;), the rootworms Diabrotica virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith &amp; Lawrence (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), the stem and cob borer caterpillars Sesamia calamistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref6">6</xref>] and the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) which was first reported from the African continent in January 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref7">7</xref>] . This caterpillar causes enormous damage to crops on the African continent. In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, it has been seen on crops such as cotton, rice, maize, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref9">9</xref>] . Chemical control has been used for a long time against this insect but it has not proved to be very effective due to acquired resistance. In the context of plant and environmental protection and sustainable agriculture, biological control consisting of the use of a biological agent against the pest was the subject of this study. The aim was to evaluate the predation efficiency of the assassin bug Rhynocoris rapax against Spodoptera frugiperda, a major pest of maize cultivation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>The work was carried out at the La M&#233; research station of the National Centre for Agronomy Research. This station is located in the south-east of C&#244;te d’Ivoire in the district of Abidjan on the road leading to Al&#233;p&#233;, with the geographical coordinates of 5˚26' North Latitude and 3˚50' West Longitude. It is bordered to the east by the M&#233; River and to the south by the Aghien Lagoon. The predatory insects and the fall armyworm S. frugiperda were captured in maize fields on the station. The test was carried out in the Entomology Laboratory of the research station.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Capture of Rhynocoris rapax</title><p>The capture of Rhynocoris rapax predators (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) was carried out between 8 am and 11 am in maize plots set up at the La M&#233; station and infested with fall armyworm. During these cooler hours of the day, the predator is more active. It is most often found in maize plots. The capture was done with a mowing net. Once captured, the insect was put in a rearing box and sent to the Entomology laboratory for the predation test. For this test, solely the adults of R. rapax were used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Collection of Spodoptera frugiperda Larvae</title><p>Daily visits to plots were made to observe the damages caused by the fall armyworm on maize crops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). When fresh fall armyworm waste was observed on an infested plant, the youngest leaves at the whorl were opened (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The larvae inside were pulled out with soft entomological forceps to avoid</p><p>crushing them. They were then put in boxes to be sent to the laboratory for testing. Also larvae of the pest were used because only the larvae are dangerous for the cultures. However, the larval stages 4, 5 and 6 were combined for the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Study of Predation Effectiveness of Rhynocoris rapax on Fall Armyworm</title><p>The predation test of Rhynocoris rapax on Spodoptera frugiperda was carried out in the laboratory at an average temperature of 26.4˚C and a relative humidity of 60%. Five (5) individuals of R. rapax (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) were placed in 5 boxes each containing 5 larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda. Contact of the predator with Spodoptera frugiperda larvae in rearing boxes allowed us to observe the action of R. rapax on S. frugiperda (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Thus, the study of predation by the predator on the fall armyworm consisted of three categories of three boxes, each containing pieces of fresh maize leaves as food for the fall armyworm:</p><p>- the first three boxes with sizes of 25 &#215; 19 &#215; 8 cm contained 5 larvae of S. frugiperda and 1 individual of R. rapax;</p><p>- the next three boxes each containing 20 larvae of S. frugiperda and 1 individual of R. rapax and;</p><p>- the last three boxes with 40 larvae of S. frugiperda and 1 R. rapax individual.</p><p>Daily monitoring was used to count the number of S. frugiperda larvae killed by the predator R. rapax and the time taken by the predator to kill all the larvae.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>The data obtained in this study were subjected to statistical analysis using the Statistical Analysis System software (SAS 9.4). The separation of means was performed by the LSD (Least Significant Difference) test at the threshold α = 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Predation of Rhynocoris rapax Depending on Number of Spodoptera frugiperda Larvae</title><p>The study of the predation of Rhynocoris rapax on Spodoptera frugiperda larvae</p><p>revealed the number of S. frugiperda larvae killed as a function of the population density of the pest. Thus, the results showed that for 40 S. frugiperda larvae and 1 R. rapax adult, the number of larvae killed was higher with an average of 6.66 &#177; 0.77 larvae per predation. This number was average with 20 S. frugiperda larvae where 1 R. rapax adult devoured 3.00 &#177; 0.79 larvae. Predation was lower with 5 larvae of S. frugiperda for 1 individual of R. rapax. A low number of 5 S. frugiperda larvae were observed, with 1.15 &#177; 0.19 larvae. The analysis of variance showed significant differences between the number of S. frugiperda killed and their population level (p = 0.0001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Prey Mortality Rate Depending on the Time</title><p>Evaluation of the mortality rate of S. frugiperda larvae showed that the predator R. rapax kills fall armyworms as a function of population level and time. A decrease in the trend curve was observed as a function of time regardless of the number of larvae. Thus, for 5 S. frugiperda larvae, the highest number of larvae killed was observed during the first three days. Between 20% and 33.33% of the larvae were killed by the predator (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). For 20 S. frugiperda larvae, 15% to 43.33% of these caterpillars were killed. For the 40 S. frugiperda larvae, 16.67% to 27% of the larvae were killed by R. rapax during these first three days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). At the latest, 7 days later all larvae were killed by the predator (Figures 5-7). In general, the highest mortality of larvae was observed during the first three days.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Predation by Rhynocoris rapax showed that the average number of Sopdoptera frugiperda larvae killed was higher when the population level of the pest was high. The increase in mortality of fall armyworm as a function of population level is thought to be due to the fact that Rhynocoris rapax is a highly voracious generalist predator. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref10">10</xref>] stated that prey consumption in these insect groups varies according to the energy requirements of the species. As an example, these</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Average number of S. frugiperda larvae killed as a function of the density</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of R. rapax</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of S. frugiperda larvae</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of killed larvae</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.66 &#177; 0.77<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00 &#177; 0.79<sup>a</sup><sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.19<sup>b</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means with the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (LSD test, p ≤ 0.05).</p><p>authors indicated that the ladybird (Coccinella septempunctata L.) can consume 100 aphids per day. The same is true for the soldier bug Podilus maculiventris Say which can consume up to 10 CPB (Colorado potato beetle) eggs per day, thus explaining the high mortality of S. frugiperda when its population increases. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref11">11</xref>] , the effect of predators on prey depends on the dominant functional types, which in turn are determined by the structure of the landscape. The results also showed that the mortality rate of S. frugiperda caterpillars varied with larvae population level and time. The high mortality observed during the first three days could be explained by the aggressiveness of Rhynocoris rapax towards S. frugiperda larvae. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref12">12</xref>] indicated that prey consumption is increasing with the development of the predator and also with the number of prey. To this effect, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref13">13</xref>] reported that the nutritional requirements of Rhynocoris marginatus F. (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) increase from the first to the fifth day instar when fed with Spodoptera litura F. In addition, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122307-ref14">14</xref>] also noted that daily prey consumption tends to be higher in the later development stages of predators. This is in agreement with our results as in that study it was R. rapax adults which were put in contact with fall armyworm larvae.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The study of the predation effectiveness of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda by Rhynocoris rapax showed that this predatory heteropteran killed significantly more S. frugiperda larvae when their population level was high. This predator caused high mortality during the first three years probably due to its high aggressiveness and voracity towards its prey during the first days. This entomophagous insect is therefore a potential enemy of the fall armyworm. However, further studies will have to be carried out to verify the effectiveness of this predator in the field. It will be necessary to breed for mass production and carry out inundative releases.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank the staff of the Entomology Laboratory of La M&#233; and the colleagues researchers of Maize-Millet-Sorghum program and those of phytopathology laboratory of the CNRA research station of Bouak&#233;. All these people have been of an indispensable contribution to the realization of this study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>N’Guessan, A.H., Essis, B.S., N’cho, A.L., N’da, H.A., Konan, K.J.-N. and Kouassi, N.A. (2023) Preliminary Study of Predation Effectiveness of the Assassin Bug Rhynocoris rapax Stal (Heteroptra: Reduviidae) on Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a Major Pest of Maize Crops. Advances in Entomology, 11, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2023.111002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122307-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoopen, M.E.-T. and Ma&amp;iuml;ga, A. (2012) Production et transformation du ma&amp;iuml;s. Collection Pro-Agro, 32 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faostat (2015) http://Faostat.fao.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rongead-ONG Chigata (2014) Diagnostic de la filière ma&amp;iuml;s en C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. 59 p. https://www.nitidae.org/files/cfd69c6f/diagnostic_de_la_filiere_mais_en_cote_d_ivoire_rongead_2014.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jean, C. and Boisclair, J. (2009) Les insects nuisibles et utiles du ma&amp;iuml;s sucré: mieux les conna&amp;icirc;tre. IRDA, 16 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moolman, J., Van Den Berg, J., Conlong, D., Cugala, D., Siebert, S. and Le Ru, B. (2014) Species Diversity and Distribution of Lepidopteran Stem Borers in South Africa and Mozambique. Journal of Applied Entomology, 138, 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Labrie, G., Bernard, R. and LeBlanc, C. (2020) Ravageurs, maladies et autres problèmes liés à la culture du ma&amp;iuml;s grain en début de saison: Outil d’aide au diagnostic. 16 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goergen, G., Kumar, P.L., Sankung, S.B., Togola, A. and Tamo, M. (2016) First Report of Outbreaks of the Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a New Alien Invasive Pest in West and Central Africa. PLOS ONE, 11, e0165632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165632</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouakou, M., Kobenan, K.C., Didi, R.G., Bini, K.K.N. and Ochou, O.G. (2019) Détection de la Chenille Légionnaire d’automne, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) (Coleoptera: Noctuidae) et Premières Observations sur sa Biologie en C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. European Scientific Journal, 15, 332-345.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N’Guessan, A.H., N’da, H.A., Essis, B.S., Hala, N. and Kouassi, N.A. (2021) Biologycycle and Natural Enemies of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Maize Crops in C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. Journal of Entomology, 18, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2021.37.46</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gilbert, A., Pineault, J. and Gurand, G. (2018) Conna&amp;icirc;tre les ennemis naturels des insectes ravageurs et favoriser leur activité dans les cultures mara&amp;icirc;chères. Compte-rendu du projet d’aménagement réalisé par écomestible à la Ferme des Quatre-Temps, Hemmigfort, 101 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giraudoux, P., Raoul, F., Delattre P., Michelat D., Ordinaire M., Quere, J.P. and LE RESEAU ROPRE (2002) Réponse des prédateurs aux variations d’abondance des campagnols. Colloque sur les ravageurs des cultures, Besanon.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hema, T. (2017) Etude de la bioécologie de Phonoctonus lutescens (Guérin et Percheron, 1887) et évaluation de son agressivité vis-à-vis de Dysdercus vo&amp;euml;lkeri (Schmidt, 1932), ravageur du cotonnier (Gossipium hirsutum) au Burkina Faso. Dipl&amp;ocirc;me d’Ingénieur du Développement Rural option: Agronomie, Université Nazi Boni (UNB), 69 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahayaraj, K. and Paulraj, G.M. (2001) Rearing and Life Table of Reduviid Predator Rhynocoris marginatus Fab. (Het., Reduviidae) on Spodoptera litura Fab. (Lep., Noctuidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 125, 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2001.00547.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122307-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, G.C., Islam, W. and Haque, M.M. (2007) Biology and Predation of Stethorus punctillum Weise (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Feeding on Tetranychus urticae Koch. Journal of Bio-Science, 15, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v15i0.2196</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>