<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1109468</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-122294</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Consumer Preference and Quality Expectation of Oyster Mushroom Black Hot Pepper Sauce “&lt;i&gt;Shito&lt;/i&gt;”
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hannah</surname><given-names>Opoku</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Doreen</surname><given-names>Dedo Adi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rita</surname><given-names>Adasi Fenteng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Hospitality and Tourism, Akenten Appiah-Menkah University of Skills Trianing and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi, Ghana</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Hospitality Management, Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi, Ghana</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study was aimed at determining consumer preference and quality expectation of black hot pepper sauce “
  shito” in general as a basis for developing oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce. A structured questionnaire was administered to 103 respondents in Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi, Ghana. Respondents preferred onion (4.94), oil (4.86), powdered pepper (4.50), mixed spices (4.51) ginger (4.50), salt (4.46), garlic (4.27) and tomato puree (3.99) as their ingredient to be used for their black hot pepper sauce. Respondents expected their sensory quality attributes of black hot pepper sauce to be after taste (4.18), tastiness (3.17), spiciness (3.11) and mouthfeel (2.93). Conclusively respondents are willing to patronize black hot pepper sauce “
  shito” produced from oyster mushroom (81%) and recommended that oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce be produced in commercial quantities.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Oyster Mushroom</kwd><kwd> Consumer Preference</kwd><kwd> “&lt;i&gt;Shito&lt;/i&gt;”</kwd><kwd> Black Hot Pepper Sauce</kwd><kwd> Quality Expectation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Background</title><p>“Shito” is a Ghanaian convenience black hot pepper sauce commonly consumed with other foods. It is made from vegetable oil, onion, ginger, tomato puree, dried pepper, smoked fish powder, smoked shrimp powder, stock cube, and spices. To make the sauce, the ingredients are combined and fried in oil. It has a wide range of applications in the food business, with a focus on condiments. “Shito” is preferred over other spicy sauces as a condiment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Mushroom is an exceptional home of nourishment, stimulant, medication and nutritive diet being created and consumed all over the world. Mushrooms are opulent in crude fibre, protein, vitamins, minerals, contain low fat, calories and no starch. They offer high quality carbohydrates enhancing the human well-being [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref2">2</xref>]. Mushrooms are a delicacy with clear food esteem. They have anyway obtained business status practically everywhere in the world because of their temperament of being attractive and the popularity of their dishes in the enormous lodgings and caf&#233;s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref3">3</xref>]. There are impressive varieties of taste and appearance. Showcasing capability of dried mushrooms is restricted, however the taste gets more grounded in the wake of drying [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref4">4</xref>]. The costs of mushroom changes because of the differing demand for them and the expanded demand for ready-to-eat nourishments. Mushrooms are measured as substitute for meat and their dietary value is equivalent to numerous vegetables. Mushroom budding is a probable activity to transform waste into greatest nutritional food with great protein transformation competence. The world production of mushroom is about 40 million tones contributed by China, USA, The Netherlands, Poland, Spain, France, Italy, Ireland, Canada and UK [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref2">2</xref>]. Food production establishments have an appeal for cut mushrooms and stores are selling an expanding number of bunches of cut new mushrooms. The mushroom business supplies around 5% to 25% of its new yield as cuts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Over the 1999-2001 periods, mushroom cultivators sold a normal of 859 million pounds which is 3.89986 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref6">6</xref>]. The estimation of the 2001-2012 strength mushroom crops in the United States added up to $37 million, up 12% from the 2000-2001 seasons. Once more, deals volume of mushrooms in the United Kingdom was 4.03 million pounds a 11% from 9% in the 2014 with just 51 cultivators delivering 1.94 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref7">7</xref>]. In Ghana likewise, singular mushroom ranchers are making between GH&#162;5.00 to GH&#162;20.00 or more daily and selling about 10 kg every week [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref8">8</xref>]. Ladies are specialists in the utilization, preparation and promotion of vegetables including mushrooms. This is on the grounds that, these are basic assets to continue the family and guarantee great soundness of the family. The business of selling mushroom is a financial endeavor for individuals, particularly ladies having minimal capital, restricted admittance to land and working under work requirements. The livelihoods they get from this endeavor contribute fundamentally to food security at the family unit level and empower ladies to accomplish a level of monetary autonomy inside the family spending plan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Mushrooms have numerous restorative properties, for example, cell reinforcement, antimicrobial and anticancer demonstrated by logical examinations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref10">10</xref>]. Also, 90% - 95% of the mushrooms are water and so are dietary supplements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref11">11</xref>]. Additionally, mushrooms have low fat and high protein, subsequently, making this gathering of nourishments more appealing. Particularly in this sense, mushrooms can be proposed to close the protein absence of veggie lover individuals. Mushrooms are favored for it’s restorative, and wholesome purposes. Before the year 2000, the cost of mushrooms was lower than that of meat, fish and a few vegetables. Additionally, after 2010, the inclination for mushrooms had expanded dully halfway to the deficiencies in meats and the imports in fish. Moreover, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref8">8</xref>] referenced that the desire for mushroom may have been because of its promptly accessible particularly in the country and perimetropolitan networks.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref12">12</xref>] added that the accessibility of dried and powdered mushrooms in the different shopping centers and the numerous notices on their dietary benefit may have added some nibble to the expanded utilization and acceptability of mushrooms. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref4">4</xref>] additionally placed that the acknowledgment of mushrooms as diets add something to the shading, smell or aroma and the flavor of the food. The investigation additionally referenced the introduction of nourishments that have mushrooms. That is mushroom add to the introduction by making the food more alluring to consumers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref4">4</xref>], the value, nourishment, simple accessibility, restorative properties, bundling and flavor as the most significant factors that impact consumers or customers to acknowledge or lean toward mushrooms over different vegetables of different items.</p><p>The oyster mushroom is delicate and susceptible to spoilage within a day of harvest. This is a constraint that fresh oyster mushroom distributors and marketers encounter. As a result, this study was aimed to examine consumer’s preference and quality expectation of oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce “shito”.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>A survey was conducted by administering a structured questionnaire. Respondents were sampled randomly and purposively based on respondents’ knowledge on the topic in Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi, Ghana, specifically Department of Hospitality Management. Respondent included students, lecturers and supporting staff using [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref13">13</xref>] sample size determination table as seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; a population of 140, the sample size to use is 103, hence 103 respondents were used.</p><p>The questionnaire comprised of multiple choice, ranking and dichotomous questions and was pretested before administering. The pretesting of the questionnaire was conducted with five (5) respondents, and the necessary modification were made before the final administration. The questionnaire was self-administered and designed to evaluate consumer preference and quality expectation of “shito” in general as a bases for developing oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce “shito”.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Proportionate allocation of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Status</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Actuals of Respondents</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prop Allocation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prop Allocation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prop Allocation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total Prop Allocation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lecturers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Supporting Staff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Analysis</title><p>Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. Graphical representations were done by Microsoft Excel.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Demographic Data of Respondents</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents the gender of respondent. The gender distribution was skewed toward females (85%) and (15%) being males. This could be due to the fact that, respondents involved in the study were from the Department of Hospitality Management which is a female dominated Department because of the program being offered.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, majority of the respondents were 40 years and below. This gives an indication that significant number of respondents were in their youthful age.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> presents the marital status of respondents, majority (74%) were single whiles (1%) was a widow and the rest married. This can be attributed to the fact that the most respondents were students.</p><p>In relation to the status (rank) of respondents, majority (82%) were student as they form the highest population of the university, (15%) were teaching staff whiles the remaining represent the non-teaching staff as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Black Hot Pepper Sauce “Shito” Preference and Quality Expectation</title><p>In terms of ingredient preferences, respondents were asked to rank the importance of some ingredients needed in their black hot pepper sauce, as shown in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). Majority (94%) of respondents ranked onion (4.94) as the most important ingredient needed in their black hot pepper sauce, followed by oil (4.86) which is also most important. This means that onion is consumed all over the world due to their distinct flavor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref14">14</xref>]. Powdered pepper, mixed spices, and ginger were the next most popular ingredients, with mean values of (4.61, 4.51, and 4.50) for each, which respondents felt to be highly significant. This could be due to the fact that, in addition to their flavor-enhancing and spicy properties, these substances have an antimicrobial effect on food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref15">15</xref>]. Tomato puree, with a mean</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Gender distribution of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (ƒ)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Age distribution of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (ƒ)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age in years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Below 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Above 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Marital status of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Marital Status</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (ƒ)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Status (rank) of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Status (Rank)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (ƒ)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Status (Rank)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teaching Staff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-teaching staff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Preference of ingredients used for black hot pepper sauce</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >I/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ingredients</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Rating</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VI 5 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IM 4 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N 3 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NP 2 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NVI 1 ƒ (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Onion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97 (94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ginger</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Garlic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato Puree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Powdered Pepper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71 (69)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89 (86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixed spices</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63 (62)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 (58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (38)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.46</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Scale: 1 - 1.49 = NVI (Not very Important), 1.5 - 2.49 = NP (Not Preferred), 2.5 - 3.49 = N (Neither important or not important), 3.5 - 4.49 = IM (Important), 4.5 - 5 = VI (Very Important).</p><p>value of (3.98), is the least recommended ingredient. Anecdotal information suggests that omitting tomato puree from black hot pepper sauce preparation has little influence on the final result.</p><p>Sensory quality of food is an important factor that consumers consider when deciding whether or not to eat. Spiciness, mouth feel, tastiness, and aftertaste were all considered when determining the sensory quality expectation of black hot pepper sauce. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the results show that, respondents prefer their black hot pepper sauce to have sweet aftertaste with the mean value of (4.18), neither tasty nor very tasty (3.17) for taste, either spicy or not spicy (3.11) for spiciness and the least expectation was mouthfeel which was neither smooth nor rough (2.93)</p><p>When respondents were asked to indicate their willingness to patronize black hot pepper sauce prepared from oyster mushroom; it was seen from (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) that, a greater percentage (81%) of respondents would like black hot pepper sauce made from oyster mushrooms. The results indicate that, black hot pepper sauce made from mushrooms would be patronized when produced in commercial quantities. The results from this study is in line with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref16">16</xref>] research which found that consumers preferred black hot pepper sauce made from soybean much more than that made from shrimp powder. In another study by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref17">17</xref>], consumers preferred shito made from snail powder to that made from shrimp powder. The inference from these findings is that, consumers are willing to try different varieties of black hot pepper sauce on the market provided the taste meets their expectations.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> indicates the responses of factor that affects respondents’ patronage of oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce. It can be seen that, taste, appearance,</p><p>texture, aroma, packaging, colour and spiciness with the representation of (71%, 65%, 53%, 53%, 51%, 51%, 49%, 41%) respectively are all very important in factors affecting respondents’ patronage. Price and drying method used for mushrooms are also considered important with the percentage of (39% and 34%) respectively. The result gives an indication that, all the factors used are of much importance to customers with it having varying percentages in its representation. This as opined by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref18">18</xref>], explains the culinary attributes of Oyster mushroom in the preparation of different dishes. Accordingly, they can be additionally accessed in dried structures, taste very great and have an exceptionally serious substantial flavor. This attributes can be used to generalize the views of respondents in this study.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Factors affecting respondents’ patronage of oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >I/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Factor</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Rating</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NVI 1 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NI 2 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N 3 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IM 4 ƒ (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VI 5 ƒ (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drying method use for mushroom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (15)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Price</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Packaging</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (51)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aroma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (53)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (5.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (5.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 (49)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taste</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 (71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Appearance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67 (65)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (53)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spiciness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>NVI = Not very Important, NI = Not Important, N = Neither important or Not Important, IM = Important, VI = Very Important.</p><p>The result from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows respondents preferred oil to be used in their black hot pepper sauce preparation. It can be seen that more than half (54%) preferred sunflower oil, followed by olive oil and coconut oil (23% and 21%) respectively. The least preferred oil was canola oil (2%). It can be concluded that, sunflower oil was the oil mostly preferred by consumers for the preparation of respondents’ oyster mushrooms black hot pepper sauce. The role of oil in frying process is to develop the flavor, texture and aroma acceptability in fried products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the results of the state of oil respondent want to be used in the preparation of their oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce and overwhelmingly (96%) stated they want fresh oil to be used for their sauce. The state of an oil in the preparation of black pepper sauce is very important to many shito lovers in Ghana. This is because the oil has the tendency of affecting the flavor, colour and safety of the end product. As stated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref20">20</xref>] in their study, oxidation and hydrolysis reaction occurs during frying or cooking processes which by-products such as alcohols, cyclic compound, polymers, dimers and free fatty acids are produced and have adverse impact on human health. The usage of over degraded oil containing hazardous secondary oxidative products and ingestion of altered frying oil has amplified in many food chains worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122294-ref21">21</xref>]. This has prompted consumers to be very particular on the type of food they are consuming into their bodies.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions and Recommendations</title><p>Findings from the study concludes that consumers’ preference and quality expectation of black hot mushroom pepper sauce (shito) is very encouraging as majority of respondents (81%) preferred it to that made from shrimp powder. Again the methods used to process the mushroom for the preparation of the sauce as well as the price at which the sauce is to be sold were all considered important determinants of consumers’ expectations.</p><p>This study would help in the commercialization of oyster mushroom black hot pepper sauce thereby; increasing the utilization of mushrooms, creating employment and reducing post-harvest losses of mushrooms in Ghana. Further works can be done on the production of black hot pepper sauce (shito) made from oyster mushroom and its microbial loads.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Opoku, H., Adi, D.D. and Fenteng, R.A. (2022) Consumer Preference and Quality Expectation of Oyster Mushroom Black Hot Pepper Sauce “Shito”. Open Access Library Journal, 9: e9468. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109468</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122294-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asafo-Adjaye, G. (2018) Water Activity Profile and Microbial Safety of Hot Pepprt Sauce “Shito”. Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thakur, M.P. (2020) Advances in Mushroom Production: Key to Food, Nutritional and Employment Security: A Review. Indian Phytopathology, 73, 377-395. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-020-00244-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osarenkhoe, O.O., Okhuoya, A.J. and Theophilus, D.A. (2014) Ethnomycological Conspectus of West African Mushrooms: An Awareness Document. Advances in Microbiology, 4, 39-54. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2014.41008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shirur, M., Ahlawat, O.P. and Manikandan, K. (2014) Mushroom Consumption and Purchasing Behaviour in India: A Study among Selected Respondents. Mushroom Research, 23, 225-231.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Afetsu, J.A. (2014) Postharvest Losses in Oyster Mushroom (Agaricus ostreatus) Produced in the Ho Municipality of the Volta Region of Ghana. Master’s Thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tuno, N. (2015) Mushroom Utilization by the Majangir, an Ethiopian Tribe. Mycologist, 15, 78-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-915X(01)80087-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guissou, K.M.L. Lykke, A.M., Sankara, P. and Guinko, S. (2018) Declining Wild Mushroom Recognition and Usage in Burkina Faso. Economic Botany, 62, 530-539. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9028-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumah, P. and Olympio, N.S. (2016) Postharvest Physiology of Horticultural Crops. Institute of Distance Learning, Kumasi, Ghana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bempah, B. (2011) Mushroom in Ghana Project.  
https://mushroomsforwellbeing.org/mushrooms-in-ghana/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gürgen, A., Yildiz, S. and Yildiz, U.C. (2018) Determination of Mushroom Consumption Preferences by Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 6, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.433353</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kortei, J.N.K. (2016) Growing Oyster Mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus) on Com-Posted Agrowastes: An Efficient Way of Utilizing Lignocellulosic Materials. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esfarjani, F., Khoshtinat, K., Zargaraan, A., Mohammadi-Nasrabadi, F., Salmani, Y., Saghafi, Z. and Bahmaei, M. (2019) Evaluating the Rancidity and Quality of Discarded Oils in Fast Food Restaurants. Food Science &amp; Nutrition, 7, 2302-2311.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W.-A., Chiu, C.P., Cheng, W-C., Hsu, C-K. and Kuo, M-I. (2013) Total Polar Compounds and Acid Values of Repeatedly Used Frying Oils Measured by Standard and Rapid Methods. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 21, 58-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y., Ngadi, M. and Oluka, S. (2008) Quality Changes in Mixyures of Hydrogenated and Non-Hdrgenated Oils during Frying. Journal of the Science of Food and Agricultural, 88, 1518-1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3239</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adebayo, E.A. and Oloke, J.K. (2017) Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus species); A Natural Functional Food. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 7, 254-264. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2017/18.7.3.254-264</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Graham</surname><given-names> L.D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2020</year>)<article-title>Substituting of Protein in Shrimp and Fish Powder for Snail Powder in the Preparation of “Shito”</article-title><source> Research Journali’s Journal of Agriculture</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>9</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dzokoto, L., Donkor-Boateng, N.A. and Antwi, E.A. (2016) “Jenal Soy Shito” an Alternative Source of Protein. Food Science and Quality Management, 58, 77-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asekun, O. and Adeniyi, B. (2004) Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activites of the Fruit Essential Oil of Xylopia aethopia from Nigeria. Fitoterapia, 75, 368-370. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2003.12.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abayomi, L.A., Terry, L.A., White, F.S. and Warner, P.J. (2006) Development of a Disposable Pyruvate Biosensor to Determine Pungency in Onions (Allium cepa L.). Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21, 2176-2179. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970) Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122294-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bamwesigye</surname><given-names> D. Akwari</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> N.F. and Hlavackova</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2019</year>)<article-title>Forest Product Export Performance in Tropical Africa: An Empirical Analysis of the Forest Sector</article-title><source> Forum of Science and Oeconomia</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 73</fpage>-<lpage>83</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>