The study of the typomorphic properties of native gold, its morphology, structure and composition is an integral component of the study of gold ore and placer objects during prospecting and exploration. They are carried out using a complex of mineralogical data and allow us to obtain a number of additional information for judging the conditions of ore formation and formation of placers, the patterns of their placement. The first methodological guidelines for the use of genetic features of native gold during prospecting and exploration work were given by Lidia Aleksandrovna Nikolaeva in 1978, later the work was republished with additions [1].

Native gold is a mineral that preserves genetic information well. This is due to the fact that gold is chemically stable, does not break down for a long time, due to its malleability, and mineral inclusions in it are preserved without undergoing oxidation. Nina Vasilyevna Petrovskaya wrote about this in detail and convincingly in her book [2]. She described native gold in detail as a mineral, and showed that in the search and exploration by the typomorphic features of placer gold (probity, size, size, roundness, internal structure), it is possible to judge the types of ore deposits involved in the formation of placer, as well as to solve the inverse problem—to search for these deposits in the areas of the demolition of placer gold.

The fundamental work of N.V. Petrovskaya [2] was accepted by the world community. This was followed by the study of native gold in many regions of the world [3] - [22] Next, we give a list of regions where the study of typomorphic features of native gold was successfully conducted in the search and exploration: (in Russia) The Siberian Platform [3] [4], the Middle course of the Lena River [5], the Lower-Amur placer region [6], Kazakhstan [7], the Northeast of Russia [8], as well as in a number of regions of the world—Alaska (Klondike and Yukon) [9] - [14], Witwatersrand [15], Australia [16], USA, Alberto Province [17], Colorado [18], China [19], Mali [20], Macedonia [21] [22], etc. All the authors solved various geological exploration tasks using the indicator properties of native gold.

The authors solved various geological exploration tasks using indicator properties of native gold. Modern methods of regional microspectroscopy analysis (RCMA) allow one to determine not only gold fineness but also the composition of mineral microinclusions in gold particles when studying native gold placers. It is the composition of mineral inclusions in combination with native gold fineness that is highly informative for deciphering the type of ore sources of placer gold.

A correlation analysis between fineness of placer native gold and composition of mineral inclusions was performed for the first time. This made it possible to identify seven parageneses for potential indigenous sources.

The aim of the study was to show that, at the Glukharinsky placer, numerous mineral inclusions in native gold particles combined with information about its fineness indicate the mineral composition of ores from various gold deposit formations involved in the placer formation. The tasks were as follows: 1) diagnosis of minerals in placer gold particles; 2) determination of typomorphic signs of native gold: fineness, particle morphology, and structure; 3) comparative analysis of typomorphism of ore and placer gold, as well as ore mineral parageneses.

The Glukharinsky placer is located in Srednekansky District of Magadan Oblast, 250 km north of Seimchan village; it is an integral part of the Shamanikh-Stolbovsky ore-placer cluster located in the middle reaches of the Kolyma River (Figure 1) at the interfluve of its right tributaries. Geotectonically, the Shamanikho-Stolbovsky District belongs to the Prikolymsky terrane of the passive continental margin (Figure 2).

The terrane structure is a set of thrust sheets complicated by late high-angle faults. Folds forming a single structural ensemble with thrusts also play a significant role. Met-amorphosed Proterozoic sandstones, metapelites, carbonate and metavolcanic rocks, as well as hyperbasites nonconformably overlain by terrigenous, volcanogenic-sedimentary, and carbonate Paleozoic and Mesozoic rocks determine the terrane structure. Intrusive complexes are represented by small Devonian and Cretaceous granitoid bodies, as well as Late Cretaceous basite dikes. The scaly thrust structure of the terrane is crossed by rare granite porphyry dikes and a granite stock with an area of 1.6 km². The morphology, composition, and conditions of granite formation are similar to the Early Cretaceous alaskite-granite complex of Edekal River of the Prikolymsky terrane. Ore occurrences and deposits near the placer compose the Glukharinsky ore-placer node, which is controlled by sub-latitudinal faults. The node includes the Nadezhda gold deposit, Glukharinskoye, Tyom-noye, and Tyi-Jurye ore occurrences, and the industrial gold placer Glukhariny Creek (Figure 3).

Other researchers have previously studied the native gold of the Glukharinsky ore-placer node (mainly placer and a small percentage of ore gold) (1970-2007) [24] [25] [26]. They established the correlation between the composition of native gold placers and indigenous sources as well as the presence of two gold generations (500‰-750‰) and (800‰-950‰), in placers: moderately high-grade and relatively low-grade generations. The first generation had bismuth-telluride geochemical orientation, while the second generation had antimony-lead geochemical orientation, which was confirmed by single tetradymite finds and widespread gold-galena associations. Nevertheless, a complex geological structure, a long history of geological development, and a complex metallogeny of the

Prikolymsky terrane made it possible to identify significantly greater diversity in the composition of native gold and mineral parageneses formed by it at the next stage of research.

The mineralogy of ore gold and its associations at the Glukharinsky ore-placer node was studied before [27] [28], which made it possible to compare the typomorphic features of native gold placers and indigenous sources. Types of mineral associations identified based on mineral inclusions and placer gold fineness (Figure 7) are quite consistent with those of indigenous sources (Table 2). However, as comparison has shown, two, and sometimes three types of gold paragenesis and two fineness intervals can be characteristic of individual indigenous sources.

The maximum amount of material in the central part of the upper layer of the Glu-kharinsky placer was supplied by the Tyomnoye ore occurrence, which is spatially close to the location of placer sampling (see Figure 3(d)): downstream

from the upper reaches of the Glukhariny Creek. It has two peaks of placer gold fineness, which may correspond to three parageneses and their quantitative content in the placer (Figure 7): gold-bismuth tel-luride-volynskite-petzite-hessite with a fineness of 900‰ (17%) and gold-cosalite-vikingite-bismutoplagionite with a fineness of 790‰ (14%). The list can also include gold-galena with a fineness of 87‰ (30%), since galena is widespread in this ore occurrence [28], as well as half of gold-hessite-petzite parageneses with a fineness of 855‰ (5%). In general, the amount of gold in the placer from the Tyomnoye ore occurrence is about 65%.

The ingress of gold to this part of the placer from the Glukharinsky ore occurrence is quite unambiguous, since a high range of gold fineness (250‰ - 900‰) was established for ore and placer gold there (Figure 3(c)). Pyrite, Ag sulfosalts, hematite, and hydrohematite are found in the ore. The percentage of gold from this ore occurrence includes gold-hydrohematite paragenesis with a fineness of 840‰ (11%) and partially gold-pyrite-polybasite-galenite with a fineness of 670‰ (12%), which comprises about 25% of the paragenesis.

Ore bodies of the Nadezhda deposit are at a greater distance (Figure 3(a)) on the opposite slope. Despite this, a small part of gold migrated to the Glukhariny Creek placer in the upper reaches and, to a lesser extent, to the central part. In addition to tellurides, glaucodote was also found in the deposit ores. Therefore, gold with gold-glaucodote paragenesis with a fineness of 950‰ (5%) and partially gold-petzitehessite with a fineness of 855‰ (5%) was transported form the placer. The percentage of gold in this placer part removed from the Nadezhda deposit is about 10%. For Yunyiy Creek and Nadezhda placers, the eponymous ore deposit is apparently the main source of migration. However, no sampling was conducted there.

Apparently, the reconstruction is approximate, since it was performed using 60 placer gold grains containing micromineral inclusions. It demonstrates the composition of placer gold at a specific area of the Glukharinsky placer, where placer samples were collected. The remaining grains did not contain ore inclusions. It is possible that small-size gold with completely recrystallized structure is clastogenic and originates from conglomerates, the outcrops of which are exposed on the node territory (Figure 3(a)).

Thus, the provided interpretation suggests that the material migrated from indigenous sources to the placer at this exact proportion. There is no doubt that the tails of low-grade gold in fineness histograms both for the ore and placer are comparable to those of the Glukharinskoye ore occurrence. Its formation is presumably associated with subvolcanic processes. However, it has not been studied sufficiently enough, and its geo-logical and structural position has not been deciphered yet.

The Tyomnoye ore occurrence and the Nadezhda deposit share certain similarities in their composition. At the same time, it is also possible that the difference in composition of ore-containing rocks affected the increased silveriness of the Tyomnoye ores. The carbonate rocks containing it, unlike aluminosilicate rocks, are more prone to secondary changes and low-temperature solid-phase transformations (skarnification, marmorization). In addition, the carbonate environment favors silver deposition, while geochemical barriers for its massive deposition may occur at the boundary of carbonate and alumino-silicate rocks. The predominant forms of silver minerals in these ores are silver-containing galena and fahlores in early parageneses and sulfosalts, silver sulfide, and low-grade gold in late parageneses. The proximity of the roof of intrusive rocks allows us to expect the existence of gold- and silver-bearing skarns at deeper levels of the Tyomnoye deposit.

Placer sampling and subsequent study of gold typomorphism can serve as an effective technique to search for certain types of deposits. According to L.A. Nikolaeva et al. [1], the general knowledge about potential types of gold mineralization, indigenous sources and their placer-subvolcanic processes. However, it has not been studied sufficiently enough, and its geo-logical and structural position has not been deciphered yet.

The Tyomnoye ore occurrence and the Nadezhda deposit share certain similarities in their composition. At the same time, it is also possible that the difference in composition of ore-containing rocks affected the increased silveriness of the Tyomnoye ores. The carbonate rocks containing it, unlike aluminosilicate rocks, are more prone to secondary changes and low-temperature solid-phase transformations (skarnification, marmorization). In addition, the carbonate environment favors silver deposition, while geochemical barriers for its massive deposition may occur at the boundary of carbonate and alumino-silicate rocks. The predominant forms of silver minerals in these ores are silver-containing galena and fahlores in early parageneses and sulfosalts, silver sulfide, and low-grade gold in late parageneses. The proximity of the roof of intrusive rocks allows us to expect the existence of gold- and silver-bearing skarns at deeper levels of the Tyomnoye deposit.

Placer sampling and subsequent study of gold typomorphism can serve as an effective technique to search for certain types of deposits. According to L.A. Nikolaeva et al. [1], the general knowledge about potential types of gold mineralization, indigenous sources and their placer-forming potentials, as well as gold transformations in placers can be obtained at a scale of 1:500,000-1:200,000, while more representative gold characteristics can be determined during prospecting and exploration.

For the Glukharinsky node, the constant presence of Bi and Te minerals in ore and placer gold characterizes not only the telluride-bismuth type of mineralization but also the correlation between gold deposits and granitoid magmatism, which was established for Yukon deposits in Alaska [31] [32]. Our research confirms that gold-quartz mineralization localized in ancient Proterozoic rocks is intrusion-related and associated with Mesozoic granitoid magmatism [33] [34] [35] [36]. This allows us to talk about the successive stages of gold mineralization in gold deposits of the Glukharinsky ore-placer node: early stage, meta-morphogenic-hydrothermal (gold-bismuth telluride) with superintrusive mineralization; late, volcanogenic (gold-polybasite-black ore); as well as a possible clastogenic stage, which is associated with conglomeration. This is confirmed by the placer gold structure: granulation of early-stage gold, which was affected by later volcanic magmatic intrusions, late-stage low-grade gold, which was not affected by metamorphism. We can assume the existence of other types of gold deposits on the territory of the Prikolymsky terrane, in weathered layers and skarns, as well as gold-bearing Carlin-type jasperoids (not forming placers): there are geological prerequisites for this.

The study of placer gold fineness in combination with com-position of mineral inclusions allowed us to identify seven types of gold paragenesis: petzite-hessite with a fineness of 855‰, pyrite-polybasite-galena (a fineness of 670‰), bismuth telluride (900‰), cosalite-vikingite (790‰), galena (870‰), glaucodot (950‰), and hydrohematite (840‰).

The performed study has shown that a large number and diversity of mineral inclusions in native gold in the Glukharinsky placer have an important indicator value. The study of the composition of these inclusions in combination with gold fineness (‰) made it possible to identify seven mineral parageneses and estimate the frequency of their occurrence (%). Comparison of these parageneses with those of ore sources located near the placer allowed us to reconstruct the primary sources of the placers, as well as to estimate the approximate contribution of each ore source to placer formation. This methodology can be applied to similar placers.

The authors would like to thank geologist G.H. Bulyakov for the placer samples provided for the study.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Savva, N.E., Biruykov, A.A. and Gluhov, A.N. (2022) Reconstruction of the Indigenous Sources of Gold of the Glu-Kharinsky Placer (Kolyma River Basin, Magadan Region, Russia). Natural Resources, 13, 225-241. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2022.1312016