<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1109564</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-122172</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Productive Potential of &lt;i&gt;Vigna unguiculata&lt;/i&gt; L., under Mexican Rainfed Conditions
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Genovevo</surname><given-names>Ramírez-Jaramillo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arturo</surname><given-names>Castellanos Ruelas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jorge</surname><given-names>H. Ramírez-Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mónica</surname><given-names>Guadalupe Lozano-Contreras</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Campo Experimental Mocochá, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Mocochá, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Centro de Investigación Regional Sureste, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Mérida, México</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Vigna unguiculata L., also known as cowpea bean or x’pelon bean (Mayan term), is an important legume mainly consumed as dry grains, although it is also used in the form of immature pods rich in protein, vitamins, fiber, minerals, and antioxidants. It is an excellent source of protein (23% to 25%). It contains all the essential amino acids, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals, and a large amount of dietary fiber, low in fat and cholesterol-free. In addition, it is considered a resilient crop due to its great adaptation to high temperatures, excess rainfall, tolerance to drought stress, little demand for high-quality soils, and ability to incorporate nitrogen into the soil because of its capacity to convert atmospheric nitrogen into available one. This work aimed to elaborate maps representing areas with high and medium yield potential under rainfed Mexican conditions. In this paper, the maps were elaborated by using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) through intersections and map algebra. The optimal agroecological requirements of the crop were the initial inputs required for the system and the information was processed with ESRI’s Arc/View 3.3 Software. It detected more than 13 million hectares with high productive potential under rainfed conditions for cowpea beans. Among the states with the largest areas were identified: Guerrero, Oaxaca, Campeche, Michoac&#225;n, Jalisco, Sinaloa, Nayarit, Veracruz, Yucatan, and Quintana Roo.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Agroclimatic Regions</kwd><kwd> Legumes</kwd><kwd> Beans</kwd><kwd> GIS</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., is a legume of the Fabaceae family considered one of the most adapted, versatile, and nutritious grain legumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref1">1</xref>]. It is used as human and animal food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref2">2</xref>] because of its high-quality protein content for human consumption and for livestock fodder with the additional advantage of fixing nitrogen for the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>This legume is one of the oldest crops known to man [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref4">4</xref>]. Cowpea is also known as blackeye pea, southern pea, bean, lubia, feijao caupi, ni’eb’e, carilla, partridge eye bean, careta bean, blackeye bean, castilla bean (Peru), patience bean (Ecuador), chicharillo, wild pea, mung bean, black-headed bean, tape bean (Uruguay), black-mouthed peas (Seville, Spain), espelon or x’pelon (Yucatan, Mexico), cow mackerel, mung bean or yorim&#243;n bean (Mexico), there are more names depending on the place to be found [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>This bean was originally domesticated in Sub-Saharan Africa, probably both west and east, before 2500 BC, and by 400 BC it was already established in all major modern producing regions of the Old World, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, the Mediterranean basin, India, and Southeast Asia. Now, it is grown in all continents except Antarctica. The Columbian Exchange introduced from Africa germplasm into the Caribbean region, the southeastern United States, and South America; and the Mediterranean germplasm was introduced to Cuba, the southwestern United States, and northwestern Mexico [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>V. unguiculata has been successfully cultivated in a wide range of geographical locations around the world because of its excellent protein quality, fiber, and micronutrient content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref6">6</xref>]. The seeds have between 20% and 30% protein by dry weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref8">8</xref>], and the leaves have a similar protein content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref9">9</xref>]. Given the advantages of climatic resilience of the species and facing the problems of climate change, this study had the following objectives: 1) to characterize the climatic and edaphic factors that affect the species; 2) to identify high-yield potential areas and their distribution in the Mexican Republic; and 3) to support policies and decision-making for better production programs.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The study was carried out, in 2022, at the laboratory of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) of the National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research (INIFAP) located in The Southeast Regional Research Center in Merida Mexico, The delimitation of the production potential was based using the agro-ecological requirements and their respective spatial query on existing maps, taking into account the climatic, topographic and soil variables, in addition to their intersections.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Agro-Ecological Requirements Determination</title><p>Crop distribution is delimited by climate factors worldwide, either by a lack or by an excess of the individuals vital needs and the specific requirements of different biotypes. The plants are submitted to climate components with asynchronous variations, turned into the most determinant factors for the success of any given crop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>The particular needs and requirements are most commonly described in ranges, usually reported for each species or even genotypes.</p><p>The result of the diagnosis shall rely on the intervals taken into account; as a result, if optimal values are considered, the resultant potential areas may indeed provide a better yield and crop profitability.</p><p>The following criteria were considered to determine the potential areas for V. unguiculata under rainfed conditions: 1) when all of the variables interact properly with each other the area was considered as the most suitable for an optimal development; 2) when there are some restricted variables and most of the climatic and soil characteristics interact properly the area was ranked as suboptimal; finally 3) those areas with all variables considered as inadequate for cowpea cultivations were reported as marginal.</p><p>Potential areas were determined taking into account only those actual open cultivation areas; as a result, their potential is even higher nationwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref19">19</xref>]. Beside climate, the altitude, soil, temperature, and annual rainfall levels were considered, as defined in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Regionalization of Cowpea Potential Areas</title><p>The Arc/View version 3.3., software developed by the American company ESRI,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> V. unguiculata agroecological requirements for rainfed conditions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Criteria</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Optimal</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Suboptimal</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inadequate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Annual Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 - 24 30 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;than 35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annual Rainfall</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 - 2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >650 to 1000 2000 to 2500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 650 Higher than 2500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Altitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >msnm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 1500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500 - 2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Higher than 2000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soils</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Types</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fluvisols Regosols Luvisols Nitisols Andosols Phaeozem Casta&#241;ozems</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cambisols</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Solonchak’s Leptosols Vertisols Gleysols Arenosols Calcisols</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Types</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loamy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sandy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 to 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indicator</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5 to 6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0 to 5.4 6.5 to 7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;than 7.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light Hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Higher than 3000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 to 3000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 2500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drainage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Types</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deficient</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>was the program used for data processing and analysis. Geo-referenced data was also represented including characteristics and distribution patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref20">20</xref>]. All of the Arc/View activity considered project parameters, which were a collection of related documents controlled during the Arc/View session.</p><p>Projects contained as many as five different views, tables, charts, layouts (or printouts) and scripts. The documents in the Arc/View project were displayed through the Project window; properly organized and stored.</p><p>The project decided how and where such documents were meant displayed, keeping the document selection active in window program in a well-defined picture. The information was further stored in an ASCII format file, always with an *. Apr. Extension.</p><p>Arc/View was mainly a maps vector generator performed by the Arc/View 3.3, according to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, in order to take the variables intersection to generate optimal, suboptimal and unsuitable potential areas.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Temperature</title><p>V. unguiculata, is an annual legume, native from Africa and widely cultivated in Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia, and the Southern United States. It is relatively well adapted to various agroecosystems, especially semi-arid regions, humid tropics, and temperate zones. It tolerates heat and drought conditions, but does not tolerate frost [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>The semi-humid and semi-dry climate favors the growth, with temperatures from 19˚C to 34˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref23">23</xref>]. However, other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref24">24</xref>], suggests that this crop can survive to temperatures above 45˚C with an adequate level of soil humidity. However, flower abortion occurs and temperatures below 25˚C negatively influence</p><p>growth.</p><p>Ustimenko and BakumovskI (1982) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref25">25</xref>], mention that flowering and ripening phase require high temperature, while low temperatures between 15˚C - 18˚C prevent the seed maturation. The optimal temperatures for its cultivation in Mexico are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The temperatures considered optimal are from 25˚C to 35˚C and suboptimal from 18˚C to 24˚C and from 30˚C to 35˚C. The Mexican states that stand out because of their higher yield potential are the next: Tamaulipas, Tabasco, Guerrero, Campeche, Michoac&#225;n, Jalisco, Sinaloa, Nayarit, Veracruz, Yucat&#225;n and Quintana Roo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Annual Rainfall</title><p>The water requirements of this crop depend on its stage of development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref26">26</xref>]. It is distinguished by its resistance to drought and tolerant to abundant rains, but it does not tolerate waterlogging; however, the lack of water in specific stages of development can affect germination, flowering, formation of pods, stem diameter, leaf area, number of leaves, number of pods per plant, weight of pods, weight of seeds and yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref27">27</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref32">32</xref>]. Bezerra et al. (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref33">33</xref>] report that the water deficit during the entire growth period can reduce yield up to 59%. This crop thrives in places with rainfall between 650 to 2000 mm. It is moderately tolerant to</p><p>drought, since it can grow with less than 300 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref35">35</xref>]. For Mexican conditions, the range of 1000 to 2000 mm was considered optimal and, suboptimal two ranges from 650 to 1000 mm and from 2000 to 2500 mm; less than 650 mm and greater than 2500 mm were ranked as not suitable areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Soils</title><p>Pandey (1990) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref36">36</xref>], indicates that cowpea grows in many kinds of soils such as sandy, clayey, in compact soils with low water infiltration capacity, tolerating acid and neutral soil pH’s from 4.3 to 7.5 and it is little tolerant to salinity.</p><p>It is a drought-tolerant species with good atmospheric nitrogen fixation capacity, adapted to different cropping systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref37">37</xref>] and to a great diversity of soils but not to akalinity or salinity. It thrives well in light, well-drained, deep soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref27">27</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref38">38</xref>].</p><p>In Mexico, the most appropriate soils, with loam and sandy loam textures, are the Fluvisols, Regosols, Luvisols, Nitisols, Andosols, Phaeozem and Casta&#241;ozems; the Cambisols (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) represents the suboptimal production potential areas.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Light Hours (Photoperiod)</title><p>When cultivating cowpea, enough light hours for each growth stage are required.</p><p>The photoperiod can have great effects on reproductive development, although some genotypes are insensitive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref40">40</xref>]. ASPROMOR (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref41">41</xref>] reports that a good light favors flowering and filling of pods. The optimal photoperiod for flowering induction is 8 - 14 hours. The reduction of light favors a stunted or creeping development of the plant, with a negative effect on yields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref42">42</xref>]. On the other hand, White (1999) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref43">43</xref>] mentioned the important role of light in regulating plant development, mainly through photoperiod effects; this crop responds better to short days than the long ones, which delays flowering and maturity. For Mexico, the optimal conditions were encountered in areas with more than 3000 light hours; equivalent to 125 days of light during crop development; the suboptimal areas are those receiving from 2500 to 3000 light hours; areas with less than 2500 light hours ranked as not suitable (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Altitude</title><p>The crop develops favorably from sea level to 1200 meters above, demonstrating a wide range of adaptation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref44">44</xref>]. D&#237;az (1997) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref45">45</xref>] mentions that cowpea grows well at altitudes of up to 1500 meters above sea level (masl) while Pandey (1990) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122172-ref36">36</xref>] reports ranges from 0 to 1500 masl, but optimal from 0 to 800 masl. For Mexico, altitudes of 0 to 1500 masl are recommended as the most optimal planting areas; suboptimal from 1500 to 2000; and those greater than 2000 are not suitable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Potential Areas for V. unguiculata in Mexico</title><p>There were found more than 13 million hectares of high yield potential under rainfed Mexican conditions distributed in 17 states: Guerrero, Oaxaca, Campeche, Michoac&#225;n, Jalisco, Sinaloa, Nayarit, Veracruz, Yucat&#225;n and Quintana Roo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) being the most important ones, and with lower potential the states of Chiapas, Tamaulipas, Tabasco, Puebla, State of Mexico, Colima and Durango. The loamy and sandy loamy soils are more suitable for cowpea production and for Mexican conditions the Fluvisols, Regosols, Luvisols, Nitisols, Andosols, Phaeozem, Casta&#241;ozems and Cambisols are considered as optimal ones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Based on the agro-ecological requirements, a large surface presents favorable altitudes for cowpea production and, only those regions (central and north-central Mexico) with more than 2000 masl were considered unsuitable. Regarding the number of light hours per year, only small areas of the states of Veracruz, Puebla and Oaxaca, with less than 2500 light hours per year were not suitable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p><p>On the other hand, and based on the average annual temperature, the optimal and suboptimal conditions are mainly found in the states closed to the Pacific</p><p>Sea, the Caribbean Sea, and the Gulf of Mexico, with tropical and subtropical climates and an average annual temperature between 25˚C and 30˚C. Regarding to the soils, practically all the states have optimal conditions, but the states bordering the Pacific Sea, from Baja California to Chiapas stand out for their quantity.</p><p>The average annual rainfall is one of the most influential variables to delimit the high and medium potential areas so the outstanding states are: Yucat&#225;n, Campeche, Quintana Roo, Veracruz, Guerrero, Oaxaca, Jalisco, Michoac&#225;n, Nayarit, and Sinaloa.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>There are optimal agro-ecological conditions to produce V. unguiculata under rainfed conditions in Mexico. The most appropriate areas are located in 17 states: overhanging for surface Guerrero, Oaxaca, Campeche, Michoac&#225;n, Jalisco, Sinaloa, Nayarit, Veracruz, Yucatan, and Quintana Roo. The soil types, precipitation, and altitude are determining factors to properly define the optimal and suboptimal potential areas. The high potential areas detected in this work far exceed the areas of V. unguiculata currently planted in the country.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Pronatura-Peninsula of Yucatan as a Mexican non-profit civil organization for financing this work as part of the project called: Validation of agroforestry models in the state of Yucatan.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ram&#237;rez-Jaramillo, G., Ruelas, A.C., Ram&#237;rez-Silva, J.H. and Lozano-Contreras, M.G. (2022) Productive Potential of Vigna unguiculata L., under Mexican Rainfed Conditions. Open Access Library Journal, 9: e9564. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109564</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122172-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ehlers, J.D. and Hall, A.E. (1997) Cowpea (Vigna unguiculate L. Walp.). Field Crops Research, 53, 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00031-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Gogoi, N., Baruah, K.K. and Meena, R.S. (2018) Grain Legumes: Impact on Soil Health and Agroecosystem. In: Meena, R.S., Das, A., Yadav, G.S. and Lal, R., Eds., Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management, Springer Nature, Singapore, 511-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0253-4_16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Murdock, L.L., Coulibaly, O., Higgins, T.J.V., Huesing, J.E., Ishiyaku, M. and Sithole-Niang, I. (2008) Cowpea. In: Chittaranjan, K. and Hall, T.C., Eds., Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants: Transgenic Legume Grains and Forages, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, 23-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405181099.k0302</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Urabi, B., Tantawi, H., Kamal, A. and Hassan, A. (2015) A Study of Stability Evaluation of Components Characters in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). International Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture, 3, 167-178.  
https://www.internationalscholarsjournals.com/articles/a-study-of-stability-evaluation-of-components--characters-in-cowpea-vigna-unguiculata-l-walp.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lagunes-Espinoza, L.C., Gallardo-López, F., Becerril-Hernández, H. and Bola&amp;ntilde;os-Aguilar, E.D. (2008) Diversidad cultivada y sistema de manejo de Phaseolus vulgaris y Vigna unguiculata en la región de la Chontalpa, Tabasco. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 14, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2006.11.047 
https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1027-152X2008000100003&amp;script=sci_abstract</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herniter, I.A., Mu&amp;ntilde;oz-Amatriaín, M. and Close, T.J. (2020) Genetic, Textual, and Archeological Evidence of the Historical Global Spread of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). Legume Science, 2, e57. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.57</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boukar, O., Massawe, F., Muranaka, S., Franco, J., Maziya-Dixon, B., Singh, B. and Fatokun, C. (2011) Evaluation of Cowpea Germplasm Lines for Protein and Mineral Concentrations in Grains. Plant Genetic Resources, 9, 515-522.  
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262111000815</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bressani, R. (1985) Nutritive Value of Cowpea. In: Singh, S.R. and Rachie, K.O., Eds., Cowpea Research, Production, and Utilization, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 353-359.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Nielsen, S.S., Ohler, T.A. and Mitchell, C.A. (1997) Cowpea Leaves for Human Consumption. In: Singh, B.B., Mohan Raj, D.R., Dashiell, K.E. and Jackai, L.E.N., Eds., Advances in Cowpea Research, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, 326-332.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Baradas, M.W. (1994) Crop Requeriments of Tropical. In: Griffiths, J.F., Ed., Handbook of Agricultural Meteorology, Oxford University Press, New York, 10-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benacchio, S.S. (1982) Algunas exigencias agroecológicas en 58 especies de cultivo con potencial de producción en el Trópico Americano. FONAIAP-Centro Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria. Ministerio de Agricultura y Cría, Maracay, 35-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H. (1979) Efectos del agua sobre los rendimientos de los cultivos. Estudio FAO: Riego y Drenaje No. 33. FAO, Roma.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2014) Ecocrop, Requerimientos ecológicos de las especies vegetales, base de datos. FAO, Roma.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García, E. (1988) Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de K&amp;ouml;ppen, UNAM. Instituto de Geografia, Ciudad de México.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corral, J.A.R., García, G.M., Acu&amp;ntilde;a, I.J.G., López, H.E.F., Ojeda, G.R., Trejo, C.O., Murphy, K.F.B. and Parra, R.A.M. (2013) Requerimientos agroecológicos de cultivos. Segunda Edición. Libro Técnico Núm. 3. INIFAP. Instituto Nacional de In-vestigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias-CIRPAC-Campo Experimental Centro Altos de Jalisco. Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, 211 p.  
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jose-Ruiz-Corral/publication/343047223_REQUERIMIENTOS_AGROECOLOGICOS_DE_CULTIVOS_2da_Edicion/links/5f1310e04585151299a4c447/REQUERIMIENTOS-AGROECOLOGICOS-DE-CULTIVOS-2da-Edicion.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INIFAP-SARH (1993) Determinación del Potencial Productivo de Especies Vegetales por Distrito de Desarrollo Rural en Campeche. INIFAP-SARH, Mérida.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INIFAP-SARH (1993) Determinación del Potencial Productivo de Especies Vegetales para el estado de Yucatán. INIFAP-SARH, Mérida.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INIFAP-SARH (1993) Determinación del Potencial Productivo de Especies Vegetales por Distrito de Desarrollo Rural en Yucatán. INIFAP-SARH, Mérida.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramírez, J.G. (2000) Atlas Geográfico del Estado de Yucatán. CD interactivo INIFAP-SISIERRA-CONACYT-Fundación Produce Yucatán A.C., Campo Experimental Mocochá, Mocochá.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ESRI (1996) ArcView GIS. The Geographic Information System for Everyone.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peksen, A. (2004) Fresh Pod Yield and Some Pod Characteristics of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Genotypes from Turkey. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3, 269-273. https://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=ajps.2004.269.273  
https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2004.269.273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, O., Alene, A.D., Manyong, V., Sanogo, D., Abdoulaye, T., Chianu, J., Fatokun, C., Kamara, A., Tefera, H. and Boukar, O. (2009) Situation and Outlook for the Tropical Legumes Improvement, II Project in West and East Africa. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, 1-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Research Council (NRC) (2006) Lost Crops of Africa: Volume II Vegetables II. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 13-25.  
http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11763.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sinha, S.K. (1977) Physiological Aspects of Yield Improvement in Grain Legumes. In: Food Legume Crops: Improvement and Production. FAO Plant Production and Protection, Paper 9, Rome, 11 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ustimenko-Bakumovski, G.V. (1982) El cultivo de plantas tropicales y subtropicales. MIR, Moscú, 429 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lima, J.R. de S., Antonino, A.C.D., Soares, W. de A. and Silva, I. de F. da (2006) Estimativa da evapotranspira&amp;atilde;o do feij&amp;atilde;ocaupi utilizando o modelo de Penman-Monteith. Irriga, 11, 477-491. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2006v11n4p477-491 
https://irriga.fca.unesp.br/index.php/irriga/article/view/3271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García, S.E. and Chaveco, O.P. (1996) El cultivo de frijol caupi para granos ministerio de la Agricultura. Estación Territorial de Investigaciones Agropecuaria de Holguín, Cuba, 21 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valladolid Chiroque, A. (1998) Desarrollo de la produccón y comercialización de las leguminosas de grano en el Perú-PROFRIZA II (Logros alcanzados y Lecciones aprendidas). In: Serie Informe Especial 1, Promenestras Tex, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Chiclayo, 66 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García, E. (1998) El Cultivo del Frijol caupí Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Estación territorial de investigaciones Agropecuaria de Holguín Cuba, Holguin, 23 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintero, E. and Gil, V.D. (2008) Instrucciones básicas para el cultivo y utilización del Caupí (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) en condiciones de bajos insumos. Programa para Fortalecer la Innovación Agropecuaria Local (PIAL), Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas, Santa Clara, 4 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asociación de Productores Agropecuarios de la Provincia de Morropon (ASPROMOR) (2013) Cadena productiva del frijol caupi, manejo agronómico en los distritos de Morropon, Santa Catalina, Buenos Aires, Salitral y San Juan de Bigote. Municipalidad distrital de Morropón, Aspromor, 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Souza Monteiro, D., Brandt, K., Cooper, J., Panzone, L., Watson, A., Cheng, Y. and Benedetti, E. (2017) Opportunities and challenges for the development of pulses markets. Report Comission by PGRO and N8 Innovation Forum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bezerra, F.M.L., Araripe, M.A.E., Teofilo, E.M., Cordeiro, L.G. and Santos, J.J.A. dos (2003) Cowpea Subjected to Water Deficit at Different Growth Periods. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, 34, 13-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alemayehu, M. (2002) Forage Production in Ethiopia a Case Study with Implications for Livestock Production. Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), Addis Ababa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tropical Forages (2008) Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.  
https://www.tropicalforages.info/text/entities/vigna_unguiculata.htm?zoom_highlight=Vigna+unguiculata</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandey, R.K. (1990) Guía del Agricultor para el Cultivo del Chícharo de Vaca de Arrozales. Primera Edición, Editorial Limusa, Ciudad de México, 218 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gonalves, A., Goufo, P., Barros, A., Domínguez-Perles, R., Trindade, H., Rosa, E.A., Ferreira, L. and Rodrigues, M. (2016) Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), a Renewed Multipurpose Crop for a More Sustainable Agri-Food System: Nutritional Advantages and Constraints. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96, 2941-2951. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.7644  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7644</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agza, B., Kasa, B., Zewdu, S., Aklilu, E. and Alemu, F. (2012) Animal Feed Potential and Adaptability of Some Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) varieties in North West Lowlands of Ethiopia. Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research, 1, 478-483.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ellis, R.H., Lawn, R.J., Summerfield, R.J., Qi, A., Roberts, E.H., Chay, P.M., Brouwer, J.B., Rose, J.L. and Yeates, S.J. (1994) Towards the Reliable Prediction of Time to Flowering in Six Annual Crops. III. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Experimental Agriculture, 30, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700023814</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Craufurd, P.Q., Ellis, R.H., Summerfield, R.J. and Menin, L. (1996) Development in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). I. The Influence of Temperature on Seed Germination and Seedling Emergence. Experimental Agriculture, 32, 1-12. 
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700025801</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ASPROMOR (Asociación de Productores Agropecuarios de la Provincia de Morropon) (2012) Cadena productiva de frijol caupi/Manejo Agronómico del caupi. Municipalidad distrital de Morropón. ASPROMOR, Piura.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albán, M. (2012) Manual de cultivo de frijol caupi. Dirección Regional Agraria de Piura. Primera Edición Piura, Piura, 40 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">White, J.W. (1999) Concepto básico de la fisiología del frijol, investigación y producción. 2nd Edition, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali-Colombia, 50 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blas Baldeón, V. (2016) Manejo fisionutricional en el rendimiento del frijol (Vigna unguiculata L.) Variedad Caupí, en condiciones edafoclimáticas del Instituto del Investigación Frutícola Olerícola Unheval-Huánuco 2016. Ingeniero Agronomo Thesis, Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizan De Huánuco, Huánuco.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122172-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Díaz, D.C.A. (1997) El cultivo del frijol caupí (Vigna unguiculada) en el bajo Cauca. Convenio SENASA-CORPOICA. Caucasia, la ciencia de la agricultura basada en la producción de grano y pastos, Ciudad de México, 6 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>