<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Soil Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5360</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojss.2022.1212025</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJSS-122144</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Anthropogenic Pedofeature in Andosols in Santome Shinden, One of the Representative Sites of the Satoyama Environment in Japan
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takao</surname><given-names>Shibusawa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kenji</surname><given-names>Tamura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maki</surname><given-names>Asano</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>586</fpage><lpage>604</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Santome Shinden, a representative site of the Satoyama landscape in Japan, has its origins in 1696 when the common land of wild grass on the Musashino plateau was developed into a strip-shaped land division, which consists of residential area, upland field, and secondary forest. We investigated soils with different land use over 300 years; they are under the secondary forest, and in the upland field where fallen leaves compost derived from secondary forest has been applied continuously for about 300 years since the development. The measured exchangeable cation values suggested that the nutrients in the secondary forest were taken out to the field as fallen leaves. On the surface layer of the upland field soil, characteristic granules of dark brown coated peds (DBC peds) were developed strongly. However, on the surface layer of the secondary forest soil, the DBC peds were not found. Electron probe micro analyzer analysis showed that the outside (dark brown part) of the DBC peds, which was observed only in the upland fields was rich in carbon. The dark brown coated pedofeature was suggested to have an anthropogenic effect due to the long-term application of fallen leaves compost. The anthropogenic activities, which were fallen leaves compost application and cultivation for about 300 years, were thought to affect the soil micromorphology. Therefore, the peds newly found in the Santome shinden field were considered to be a soil microstructure that symbolizes anthropogenic activities.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Anthropogenic Pedofeature</kwd><kwd> Fallen Leaves Compost</kwd><kwd> Long-Term Cultivation</kwd><kwd> Satoyama</kwd><kwd> Soil Micromorphology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In Santome Shinden area, it has been more than 300 years since a different land use started in 1696 as upland field and deciduous secondary forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref1">1</xref>]. The area was reclaimed from common land of wild grass to form mosaic-like landscapes, comprising of human residential area, upland field, and secondary forest. These still remain in modern times; therefore, the Santome Shinden area has been considered to be a typical example of an area showing a Satoyama landscape on a plateau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref2">2</xref>]. Santome Shinden has been approved as a historic site by Saitama prefecture, Japan, because of its high landscape and historical value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref3">3</xref>]. In addition, it has been certified as an important Satochi-Satoyama from the perspective of biodiversity conservation by the Ministry of the Environment in Japan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref4">4</xref>]. The Satoyama landscape is a traditional Japanese rural land-use system, which represents a balanced relationship between human beings and nature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Santome Shinden has been a settlement centered on upland farming with sweet potato as the main crop. During the middle of the Edo period in Japan (i.e., 1694-1696), about 1350 ha of common land of wilderness was developed by the lord of the Kawagoe domain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref1">1</xref>]. According to the “History of Miyoshi Town [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref6">6</xref>] ”, sweet potato cultivation expanded and became popular in response to the consumption demand in Edo, and then distribution with Edo became more important. Today, Miyoshi Town which includes a part of Santome Shinden, supplies vegetables to Tokyo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref7">7</xref>], but in the Santome shinden area sweet potato is still traditionally cultivated using fallen leaves compost. And the farming in the area called “the farming method in Musashino with composted fallen leaves” has been authorized as the Japanese Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in Japan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>So far many studies have been reported on the Santome Shinden from the aspect of historical geography, landscape evaluation, and ecological planning; however, few studies have been conducted on its soil aspect. Information on soil micromorphology under a typical Satoyama environment has also been limited.</p><p>Many findings have been published on the effect of continuous use of organic matter on the physicochemical properties of soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref13">13</xref>], however, knowledge on those from the viewpoint of soil micromorphology has been restricted.</p><p>The soil is vital for the production of food and other biomass and serves as a physical and chemical environment for mankind [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref14">14</xref>]. Soil micromorphology acts as an integrating tool in all soil disciplines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref15">15</xref>]; thus, soil micromorphological approaches have been considered to be one of the important approaches in examining long-term effects to the soil. There are studies on soil micromorphology including Andosols in Japan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref17">17</xref>], but micromorphological studies on long-term effects of organic matter in Andosols are limited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>In addition, there have been a few studies on fallen leaves compost. These include studies from the perspective of the utilization of familiar materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref21">21</xref>], the chemical and biological changes due to differences in composting years in relation to Satoyama conservation activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref22">22</xref>], and the application of a paddy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>We will clarify the characteristics of the soil in the upland field and secondary forest, which were developed in 1696 from the same common land of wild grass. And the surveyed upland field has been farmed for over 300 years by application of fallen leaves compost from a nearby secondary forest. To achieve the purpose, we investigated mainly from a soil micromorphological point of view, which reflects the long-term characteristics of the soils.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Site Descriptions and Field Management</title><p>The survey site was Santome Shinden mainly in Miyoshi town and Tokorozawa city, Saitama prefecture, adjacent to the north of Tokyo. This is located on the Musashino plateau, which is covered with volcanic ash [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref24">24</xref>]. The average precipitation and average annual temperature in this area are 1530 mm and 14.6˚C, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref25">25</xref>]. The soil distributed in this area is Melanic Silandic Andosols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref26">26</xref>].</p><p>In the Kanto-Koshin district (including Santome Shinden) where is widely covered with volcanic ash, it has been reported that wind erosion occurs due to strong winds and dryness from winter to spring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref27">27</xref>]. According to data from the Tokorozawa Meteorological Station [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref28">28</xref>] near to Santome Shinden, approximately 73% of the days with a maximum wind speed of 10 m∙s<sup>−1</sup> or higher occur in the winter to spring period (December to April) in 2017 to 2021. Field use in Santome shinden area is mainly for sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) from spring to autumn, and the fields are bare from winter to spring. Therefore, wind erosion in upland fields in Santome shinden area is estimated from winter to spring.</p><p>Santome shinden area is characterized by a strip-shaped land allocation, which is distributed among farmers as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref29">29</xref>]. Its approximate width, depth, and total area per farm was 73 m, 683 m, and about 5.0 ha, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref1">1</xref>]. It is known for its unique regular land allocation, which is composed of a residential area, upland field that is behind the residential area, and secondary forest that is used for collecting fallen leaves in the farthest part of the residential area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref29">29</xref>]. Farming in this land allocation was based on the use of fallen leaves as compost from the secondary forest, which is dominated by Konara oaks (Quercus serrata) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref30">30</xref>] . Some farmers in Santome Shinden have been cultivating sweet potato for about 300 years using the fallen leaves compost which is prepared according to the knowledge of each farmer. Such land allocation and farming still remain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>In this study, soil sampling was carried out in the upland fields (35˚49'58&quot;N, 139˚29'53&quot;E) and the secondary forest (35˚49'49&quot;N, 139˚29'39&quot;E) of the farmer. The land has been cultivated for 13 generations since the Santome Shinden reclamation. For generations the land is used to cultivate sweet potato and leaves from the secondary forest is used as compost by the farmer. According to the</p><p>hearing from the farmer, approximately 3 - 5 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> of fallen leaves compost (analysis by the authors; C:N ratio 19.1; total carbon 345.6 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>; and total nitrogen 18.1 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) was applied to the field to a depth of approximately 30 cm using a rotary tiller for cultivating sweet potato every year. In recent decades, the farmer has been making fallen leaves compost by adding rice bran to fallen leaves. And the farmer said that only fallen leaves compost was used for sweet potato cultivation because it was preferable for sweet potato cultivation not to have a lot of nutrients.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Soil Samples Collection and Physicochemical Properties</title><p>Soil surveys were conducted according to the Handbook for Soil Survey by the Japanese Society of Pedology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref31">31</xref>]. Soil hardness value was measured by using Soil Hardness Tester (DIK 5553, Daiki Rika Kogyo Co. Ltd., Konosu, Japan), which has penetrating cone of 25˚20' in apex angle and 18 mm in base diameter. We collected and analyzed soil samples in the secondary forest and upland field where farming using fallen leaves compost have been done for about 300 years. Collected soil samples from each horizon were air dried and passed through 2 mm and 0.5 mm sieves prior to chemical analysis. Undisturbed soil core samples were also collected using a 100-mL steel corer (5 cm in diameter) at depths of 0 - 5, 30 - 35, and 45 - 50 cm to check the physical properties and prepare soil thin sections.</p><p>Physical properties of soil including bulk density, three-phase ratio, and saturated hydraulic conductivity were analyzed in triplicate according to the Method of Soil Environmental Analysis by the Committee of Soil Environmental Analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref32">32</xref>].</p><p>Soil chemical properties were determined based on the Method of Soil Environmental Analysis by the Committee of Soil Environmental Analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref32">32</xref>]. Organic carbon content (OC) and total nitrogen (TN) were measured using a NC analyzer (SUMIGRAPH NC-22F, SCAS, Osaka, Japan). Exchangeable cations (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, and Na<sup>+</sup>) were determined in solution by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AA6650, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Available phosphate (P) was measured by Bray No. 2 method using ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometry (UV-1280, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Preparation and Analysis of Soil Thin Sections</title><p>100 mL of collected undisturbed soil core samples were used to prepare the soil thin sections according to Nagatsuka and Tamura [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref33">33</xref>]. They were freeze dried in the laboratory and then impregnated with a polyester resin [mixed polyester resin A: polyester resin B (Maruto Instrument Co., Ltd.) = 8:2 at 1000 mL with 10 mL of benzoyl peroxide for embedding]. The samples hardened by the resin were cut using a cutting machine (MC-32, Maruto Instrument Co., Ltd., Tokyo). In the initial polishing, the samples were ground using abrasive C3000 from Maruto and then bonded onto a glass slide (5 cm &#215; 5 cm) with an epoxy resin. The resulting samples were cut to reduce the thickness and ground to a thickness of approximately 30 μm. They were polished manually and consecutively using abrasive C400 and C3000 from Maruto.</p><p>We described the soil micromorphology according to the Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref34">34</xref>] with experiments that were conducted using a polarizing microscope (BH-2, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo). The size threshold between coarse and fine materials (C/F concept) was 10 μm. The C/F concept and abundance of voids were obtained under plane-polarized light (PPL).</p><p>Optical microscopy images of soil thin sections were used for Image analysis. The color images were converted into black and white binarized images for quantification of porosity using open source software Image J (National Institute of Health, USA; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). In the calculation of porosity abundance, 10 images per sample were analyzed using image J.</p><p>The composition of the coatings was measured with EPMA (JXA-8530F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo) at the Open Facility Network Office within the Research Facility Center for Science and Technology at the University of Tsukuba.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Soil Profile Morphology and Physicochemical Properties</title><p>The soil profile descriptions in Santome Shinden are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. In the surface layer (0 - 16 cm) of the upland field (STM 1), a fine granular structure (1 - 2 mm) was developed strongly and the color was dark brown (10YR3/3). Meanwhile, in the surface layer (10 - 22 cm) of the secondary forest (STM 2), a crumb structure (1 - 5 mm) was developed strongly and the color was black (10YR2/1). The particles with the characteristics that the dark brown materials surround the B-horizon-like brown particles were observed in Ap1 and Ap2 horizons in STM 1.</p><p>Soil hardness values of Ap1 and Ap2 horizons in STM 1 were 0.022 and 0.041 MPa, respectively, suggesting that the materials were very loose. At the AB horizon (30 - 43 cm) in STM 1, the soil hardness value increased abruptly to 0.433 MPa, suggesting plow pan. Up to the AB horizon, very fine roots were mainly observed; however, few roots were observed below the Bw1 horizon, which showed a brown color (7.5YR3/4).</p><p>In STM 2, a blackish layer developed up to 50 cm and showed the formation of a thick A horizon. In A1 and A2 horizons, a crumb structure was developed strongly. Many very fine and medium roots were observed in A1 horizon. Meanwhile, very fine and fine roots were observed commonly in the A2 to A4 horizons. Soil hardness values were 0.154 - 0.279 and 0.503 MPa in A and B horizons, respectively. No sudden change in the values was observed in STM2.</p><p>The A horizon of the soil in the upland field was 0 - 30 cm. Meanwhile, A horizon of the soil under the secondary forest was as thick as 50 cm. On the same topographical surface and soil parent material, it was observed that the thickness of A horizon is different at the two sites with different land use for over 300 years. And ‘effective soil depth (ESD)’ that has a low soil hardness value (&lt;0.718 - 0.982 MPa) is important in crop production due to the restriction of growth of fine roots by high soil hardness value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref35">35</xref>]. Although STM 2 is under secondary forest, ESD values in STM 1 and STM 2 were 43 and 100+, respectively. From the data, it was thought that surface soil layers were effectively used in STM 1 of cultivated land with a plow pan.</p><p>The three-phase ratio of solid/liquid/gas phases on the surface layer of STM 1 was approximately 2:3:5 (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In the lower layer of STM 1, the proportion of the gas and liquid phases decreased and increased, respectively. The bulk</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Soil profile descriptions in Santome Shinden</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Land use</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Horizon</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Depth (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Color</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Structure<sup>a</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soil hardness (MPa)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Roots<sup>b</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upland field</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10YR3/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LiC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GR/3, CR/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(STM 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR2/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LiC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GR/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.041</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/c, F/f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR3/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SB/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.433</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/c, F/f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 - 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR3/4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/f, F/f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR3/4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/f, F/f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 - 100+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10YR3/4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/vf</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+1 - 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >forest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR2/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LiC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CR/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/m, F/c, M/f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(STM 2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10YR2/1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LiC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CR/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/c, F/c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 - 38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10YR1.7/1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CR/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/c, F/c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR2/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SB/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/c, F/c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR2/3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SB/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.503</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/f, F/f</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 - 100+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5YR3/4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SB/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.503</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VF/vf, F/vf</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Type (CR, crumb; GR, granular; MA, massive; SB, subangular blocky)/Grade (1: weak, 2: moderate, 3: strong); <sup>b</sup>Type (CR, crumb; GR, granular; MA, massive; SB, subangular blocky)/Grade (1: weak, 2: moderate, 3: strong).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Soil chemical properties in Santome Shinden</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Land use</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Depth (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Bulk density (Mg∙m<sup>−3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Three phase distribution (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Porosity (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Solid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liquid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gaseous</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Upland field (STM 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Secondary forest (STM 2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>density in STM 1 was generally higher than that in STM 2. In particular, the bulk density was higher in the middle layer (30 - 35 cm) than surface layer (0 - 5 cm). The increase and decrease in solid phase ratio and porosity, respectively suggested the possibility of being trampled by cultivation. The bulk density of the soil under the secondary forest was approximately 0.45.</p><p>The soil chemical properties in Santome Shinden are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The organic carbons in the surface horizon in Ap1 of STM1 and in A1 of STM2 were 36.0 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup> and 90.4 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Rumpel and K&#246;gel-Knabner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref36">36</xref>] mentioned that organic C input into subsoils occurs in dissolved form (DOC) following preferential flow pathways, as aboveground or root litter and exudates along root channels and/or through bioturbation. In STM 2, very fine and fine</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Soil chemical properties in Santome Shinde</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Land use</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Horizon</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Depth (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >OC (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >TC (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >CEC (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Exchangeable cation (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Base satu. (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Available P (mg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P absorption (mg∙100g<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KCl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Upland field (STM 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >441</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2191</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2233</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2429</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 - 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2490</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2502</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 - 100+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2532</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Secondary forest (STM2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+1 - 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2356</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2468</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 - 38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2479</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2497</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bw2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 - 100+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2415</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>roots were observed up to 100 cm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), suggesting that OC was due to root system activity to the deep horizon. In the secondary forest of Santome Shinden, fallen leaves are collected, and organic matter has been added because the organic matter has been provided continuously from undergrowth and the residue of fallen leaves. On the other hand, in cultivated land, the influence of severe wind erosion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref37">37</xref>] is suggested by the seasonal wind (so called karakkaze), which blows at a wind speed of &gt;10 m∙s<sup>−1</sup> on the bare cultivated land with no crops from winter to early spring.</p><p>The pH (H<sub>2</sub>O) in STM 2 was 5.1 - 5.5; however, the measured pH of 6.1 - 6.5 in STM 1 was higher. This tendency was similar for pH (KCl). In the surface horizon of STM 1 and STM 2, the exchangeable Ca found was 19.9 and 1.1 cmol<sub>c</sub>∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The exchangeable Mg found was 0.5 and 5.4 cmol<sub>c</sub>∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Overall, the exchangeable base was very low in STM 2. The base saturation values were 5.5% and 75.0% in the surface horizon of STM 1 and STM 2, respectively. From the data of these pH, exchangeable cation and base saturation values, it was thought that the nutrients in the secondary forest were taken to the field as compost of fallen leaves. The phosphate absorption coefficients were higher than 1500 mg∙100g<sup>−1</sup> in both STM 1 and STM 2, indicating the large amount of specific phosphate sorption that is peculiar to Andosols. The available phosphorus values were low in both the lower layer of STM 1 and STM 2, but in the surface layer of STM 1 it was shown that available phosphorus was enriched. It was indicated that available phosphorus accumulated in the surface layer due to fertilization.</p><p>Prior to the reclamation of the Santome Shinden area, historical documents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref1">1</xref>] described the area was used as a common land of wild grass. The land after reclamation has been used for approximately 300 years, which resulted in changes in soil morphology and physicochemical properties. In STM2, characteristic properties of Andosols such as low bulk density and low base saturation values were indicated. However, increase of values in base saturation, available phosphorus and bulk density in the surface layer of STM 1 were shown, suggesting the effect of long-term plowing of fallen leaves compost. In particular, on the surface layer of the upland field where the fallen leaves compost has been used continuously, particles coated by dark brown materials were observed. Thus, we conducted a micromorphological study to consider the anthropogenic effect of long-term application of fallen leaves compost.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Soil Micromorphology</title><p>In the surface layer (0 - 5 cm) of STM 1 and STM 2, granules of dark brown coated (DBC) peds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)) and crumbs and granules peds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)) were strongly developed, respectively. The DBC peds were observed only in the upland field and not observed in the secondary forest. Approximately 30% - 40% of the granules peds were observed as DBC peds, although this is semi-quantitative, depending on the position of the sliced section and the polishing conditions. Strongly developed granules with coating pedofeature were observed in STM 1 rather than in STM 2.</p><p>STM 1 (0 - 5 cm) was dominated by the granular microstructure with a diameter of 0.1 - 3.0 mm rather than a crumb microstructure. It also showed an open porphyric C/F relative distribution. In STM 1 (30 - 35 cm), the structures were different between the upper and lower parts of the soil thin section, showing a plow pan, which was verified by an interview with a farmer who stated that cultivation was about 30 cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). In the upper part of the soil thin section, granules were predominant. Meanwhile, in the lower part of it, a compact structure including micro-aggregates that consisted of fine fractions and voids such as vugh/channel among aggregates with sizes of 0.5 - 8.0 mm. Partially accommodated subangular blocky peds dominated the STM 1 (45 - 50 cm), which showed a close porphyric C/F relative distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(e)).</p><p>Crumbs dominated the layer of STM 2 (0 - 5 cm). Granules and subangular blocky peds were also observed STM 2 (0 - 5 cm), which showed a close porphyric C/F relative distribution. In STM 2 (30 - 35 cm), crumbs and granules were observed, showing an open porphyric C/F relative distribution. Similar to STM 1 (45 - 50 cm), STM 2 (45 - 50 cm) showed a close porphyric C/F relative distribution, which was dominated by subangular blocky peds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(f)). Similar soil microstructures were observed in the 45 - 50 cm layer of both STM 1 and STM 2.</p><p>In terms of basic organic components and pedofeatures, the existence of DBC peds and particles with dark brown coating pedofeature were noted in STM 1 (0 - 5 cm) and upper part of STM 1 (30 - 35 cm). This pedofeature was observed only in the upland field soil (STM 1) but not in the secondary forest soil (STM 2). Plant residues and black punctuations were found in all horizons of STM 1. In STM 2, light yellow to brown plant residues with sizes of 0.5 - 2.0 mm were distributed randomly. In STM 2 (0 - 5 cm), round or elliptical and pale red intact excrements pedofeatures with a size of 50 - 100 μm were observed. These pedofeatures also existed as infilling within the crumb. Pedofeature of loose discontinuous infillings were observed in STM 2 (45 - 50 cm).</p><p>STM 1 (0 - 5 cm) showed a larger void abundance than STM 2 (0 - 5 cm) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The surface layer (0 - 5 cm) soil of STM1 had significantly more porosities compared with that of STM2, however the middle layer (30 - 35 cm) soil</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Micromorphplogy of the soil thin sections</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Land use</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Depth (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dominant micro- structure<sup>†</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Related Distributions<sup>‡</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Aggregation</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Voids</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peds<sup>&#167;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade of pedality<sup>&#182;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type<sup>††</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Abundance<sup>‡‡</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Upland Field (STM1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gr, Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Po</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 - 3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cdp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#177;5.09)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gr, Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Po/En</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 - 7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cdp, Ch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#177;8.36)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 - 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cdp, Pl, Vu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#177;2.75)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Secondary Forest (STM2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr, Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr, Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S, M-S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 - 5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cdp, Pl, Ch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#177;6.01)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr, Gr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Po</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gr, Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S, S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 - 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cdp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.2***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#177;5.33)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb, Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-M, M-S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 - 3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cdp, Pl, Vu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#177;5.46)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>†</sup>Gr: Granular structure, Cr: Crumb structure, Sb: Subangular blocky structure; <sup>‡</sup>Po: open Porphyric, En: Enauric, Mo: Monic; <sup>&#167;</sup>Gr: Granules, Cr: Crumbs, Sb: Subangular blocky peds; <sup>&#182;</sup>S: Strongly, M: Moderately; <sup>††</sup>Cdp: compound packing, Vu: vughs, Ch: channels, Pl: planes; <sup>‡‡</sup>Significant differences between STM1 and STM2 for 0 - 5 cm and 30 - 35 cm at p &lt; 0.01(**) and p &lt; 0.001(***).</p><p>of STM1 had significantly less porosities compared with that of STM2. It was thought that the reduction of porosity in STM1 was due to the compaction by cultivation. But the lower layer (45 - 50 cm) soil between STM1 and STM2 had almost same value of void abundance and not significantly difference.</p><p>In STM 1 (0 - 5 cm), which is the surface layer of the field, compound packing voids between single grains and aggregates were dominant. In the lower layer of STM 1 (45 - 50 cm), compound packing voids such as those due to plant root traces were prominent. In addition, accommodated planar voids among subangular blocky structures were also found. In the surface layer of the secondary forest (STM 2), complex packing voids by plant root traces were prominent. Planar voids that divided subangular blocky structures were also observed. In the lower layers of the secondary forest (STM 2), compound packing voids such as by plant root traces (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)) were observed along with planar voids, which divided the subangular blocky structures.</p><p>SEM image of DBC peds is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a). Dark-colored and light-colored parts were found on the outside and inside of the particle, respectively. In the outside of the DBC peds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)), clear peaks for Ca, Mg, and Mn were found. Meanwhile, in the inside of the DBC peds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)), clear peaks for Al and Ti were observed. In STM 1, fallen leaves compost was prepared by mixing rice bran and fallen leaves. Since Mn is distributed unevenly in rice bran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref38">38</xref>], the detected Mn may be derived from the rice bran component that attached during the preparation of the compost. The elemental mapping of DBC peds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)) indicated that C was more abundant on the outside (lower half in the image) than inside (upper half in the image). In addition, O and Al were more abundant on the inside than outside. The inside of the DBC peds (brown part) was relatively rich in Al and Ti; thus it is rich in minerals. Meanwhile, the outside of the DBC peds (dark brown material-covered part) was rich in C. The DBC peds were considered to be the particles with more organic</p><p>material (as in A horizon), which coated the particles with more minerals (as in B horizon).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. DBC Peds in Other Soils</title><p>In Andosols, coatings and internal hypocoatings of micromass have been observed on the surface and inside of pumice fragments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref39">39</xref>]. Clay coatings appear with increased weathering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref40">40</xref>]. And the coatings in Andosols have been reported in Italy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref40">40</xref>], Iceland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref39">39</xref>], and central Mexico [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref41">41</xref>]. Granular microstructures have been found to be an important characteristic of Andosols in Japan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref42">42</xref>]. STM 2 (0 - 5 cm), the secondary forest soil was found to resemble the Italian Andosols from Tenerife [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref40">40</xref>] in terms of the observed granular and irregular blocky microstructures. There have been researches such as the above on the micromorphology of Andosols. However, the microstructures on the granular peds with the dark brown substance coating in STM 1 (0 - 5 cm) are new in Andosols; thus, the formation of DBC peds was not due solely to the effect of the parent material.</p><p>If DBC peds were formed by the accumulation of organic matter, these peds may be found in Chernozems, which contain a large amount of organic matter that is accumulated under natural grassland vegetation. Chernozems are distributed under steppe vegetation and their principal soil-forming processes include humus accumulation, soil-aggregation and distribution of carbonates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref43">43</xref>]. For example, in Chernozems beside the Azov Sea in Russia, a large part of their humus horizons was typically dark gray color due to the groundmass and moderately separated granular structure. Meanwhile, their horizon B is dark brown loam and calcareous with a crumby structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref44">44</xref>]. We have not found reports on DBC peds found in Chernozems, which are typical natural grassland soil with microstructures that were formed over a long period of time. This suggests other effects aside from the cumulative effect of plant materials under natural grassland vegetation. In addition, regarding grassland vegetation, there are no confirmed reports of such DBC peds in the Aso region where grassland is maintained in Japan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref45">45</xref>].</p><p>In purely natural conditions, soils are formed by soil-forming factors; however, human activities such as cultivation, harvesting of grasses, grazing, and firing field affect the pedogenesis process, resulting in the formation of anthropogenic soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref43">43</xref>]. Anthrosols are soils that are formed through long-term human activities such as addition of organic materials or household wastes and irrigation or cultivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref46">46</xref>]. Pedologist and archaeologist have studied the anthropogenic activity and soil formation from the plaggen soil in Europe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref47">47</xref>] to the Amazonian dark earth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref49">49</xref>]. Anthrosols are thought to be the result of the continuous application of organic matters, which form layer A. However, the microstructures on the granular peds with a dark brown substance coating, which were observed in STM 1 (0 - 5 cm), are not yet reported in Anthrosols. It seemed that the DBC ped was not formed only by human activities.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Anthropogenic Pedofeature in the Upland Field of Andosols in Santome Shinden</title><p>Since the reclamation in 1696, the application of fallen leaves compost and cultivation have been carried out continuously in the upland fields of Santome Shinden; therefore, the area in the upland fields of Santome Shinden is a very anthropogenic environment. On the other hand, the forest in Santome Shinden is a secondary forest though, the introduction pathway for carbon is via biological circulation in the ecosystem. We confirmed that the soil microstructures under the secondary forest and those formed by anthropogenic effects such as continuous use of fallen leaves compost and cultivation in the upland field are completely different. It was thought that the continuous anthropogenic effects make the soil structure special, and the newly confirmed DBC peds in Andosols in the fields of Santome shinden might be a soil microstructure that symbolizes anthropogenic activities.</p><p>In the upland field of Andosols at the Ibaraki Agricultural Center in Japan, the examination of continuous organic matter application for 20 years from 1984 was conducted in 6 test plots (i.e., wheat straw, rice straw compost, sawdust cow dung compost, sludge compost, dried pig dung, and chemical fertilizer as a control) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref50">50</xref>]. As a result of verification of the examination by the authors, it was newly confirmed that DBC-like peds existed only in the wheat straw and rice straw compost plots. The DBC-like peds were found only in the plant organic material plots, suggesting the effect of continuous use of plant organic material and long-term cultivation in the formation of the peds.</p><p>Regarding the coating structure, a “snowball” structure with very well-developed coatings enveloping a quartz grain have been reported in Devensian sediments found in South England [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122144-ref51">51</xref>]. The authors pointed out that the laminated structures were formed from both water- and wind-deposited sheets, which suggested a vegetation-free surface (bare ground) and sequence of soil disruptions. These can be reflected from the seasonal climatic variation with the accumulation of silts on the sticky and damp surfaces during winters and the sands that formed by sheet flow during the early active layer season of spring and early summer. It was suggested that seasonal climatic variations such as wind and water environment affect the structure of soil. These seasonal climatic variations have something in common with Santome Shinden specifically during the period of bare land and wind erosion. In the fields of Santome Shinden, there are no crops from late autumn to early spring; thus, the land is bare. In particular, during the strong wind season from winter to spring, there are many windy days with winds of ≥10 ms<sup>−1</sup>. These seasonal climatic variations might influence the formation of DBC peds</p><p>In the early stages of reclamation, grassland vegetation disappeared to develop upland field; therefore, the land became bare and the wind erosion progressed. In the fields, it is necessary to input organic materials for farming. Farmers aim to secure nutrients by applying fallen leaves compost, which are derived from the secondary forest. However, there are no crops from late autumn to spring; thus, light particles in Andosols are eroded by dry strong winds. From spring to autumn, fallen leaves compost is applied and cultivated, and then crops are grown and harvested. The result of this cycle of natural and anthropogenic environments is the Satoyama landscape in Santome Shinden. Thus, its symbolic existence is considered as the anthropogenic pedofeatur.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The characteristic DBC peds were considered due to the anthropogenic effects of continuous use of plant organic matter and cultivation in the field of Andosols in Santome shinden. According to the results of our study and data from literature, it was suggested that the anthropogenic effects were thought to be reflected in the micromorphological properties of the soil in Santome shinden.</p><p>The above considerations are related to soil micromorphological characteristics in the upland field and secondary forest soils in Santome shinden, one of the representative sites of the Satoyama environment in Japan. It is necessary to proceed with further study on formation of DBC peds and further survey in other area to examine the soil under the Satoyama environment.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p><p>We would like to thank Mr. Yoshiaki Umemiya, technical advisor, Tsukuba Center, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for his guidance and encouragement in the chemical analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shibusawa, T., Tamura, K. and Asano, M. (2022) Anthropogenic Pedofeature in Andosols in Santome Shinden, One of the Representative Sites of the Satoyama Environment in Japan. Open Journal of Soil Science, 12, 586-604. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2022.1212025</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122144-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santome Historic Site Preservation Society (1929) Santome Development Record. Santome Historic Site Preservation Society, Miyoshi. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takeuchi, K., Washitani, I. and Tsunekawa, A. (2001) SATOYAMA: The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saitama Prefecture, Japan (2022) History of Santome Shinden Area. (In Japanese) 
https://www.pref.saitama.lg.jp/b0902/santome/300nennsanntome.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of the Environment, Japan (2022) The Important Satochi-Satoyama from the Perspective of Biodiversity Conservation. (In Japanese) 
https://www.env.go.jp/nature/satoyama/11_saitama/no11-3.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takeuchi, K. (2010) Rebuilding the Relationship between People and Nature: The Satoyama Initiative. Ecological Research, 25, 891-897. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0745-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miyoshi Town (1986) History of Miyoshi Town. Diichi-Hoki, Tokyo. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Terauchi</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>The Continuation of Traditional Farming System in Kanto Region: A Case Study of Kamitome Area on Saitama Prefect. Iruma District. Miyoshi Town</article-title><source> Journal of Rural Community Studies</source><volume> 103</volume>,<fpage> 61</fpage>-<lpage>76</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (2022) The Japanese Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems. (In Japanese) 
https://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/kantai/giahs_3_101.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tebrügge, F. and Düring, R.-A. (1999) Reducing Tillage Intensity—A Review of Results from a Long-Term Study in Germany. Soil and Tillage Research, 53, 15-28. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00073-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edmeades, D.C. (2003) The Long-Term Effects of Manures and Fertilisers on Soil Productivity and Quality: A Review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 66, 165-180.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023999816690</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnston, A.E., Poulton, P.R. and Coleman, K. (2009) Soil Organic Matter: Its Importance in Sustainable Agriculture and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes. Advances in Agronomy, 101, 1-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00801-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scotti, R., Bonanomi, G., Scelza, R., Zoina, A. and Rao, M.A. (2015) Organic Amendments as Sustainable Tool to Recovery Fertility in Intensive Agricultural Systems. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 15, 333-352. 
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162015005000031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tshuma, F., Rayns, F., Labuschagne, J., Bennett, J. and Swanepoel, P.A. (2021) Effects of Long-Term (42 Years) Tillage Sequence on Soil Chemical Characteristics in a Dryland Farming System. Soil and Tillage Research, 212, Article ID: 105064. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bünemann, E.K., Bongio, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R.E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T.W., Mader, P., Pulleman, M., Sukkel, W., Van Geoeningen, J.W. and Brussard, L. (2018) Soil Quality—A Critical Review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120, 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Blum, W.E.H. (2008) The Role of Soil Micromorphology in the Light of the European Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. In: Kapur, S., Mermut, A. and Stoops, G., Eds., New Trends in Soil Micromorphology, Springer, Berlin, 1-4. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79134-8_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Terasawa, S. (1984) Physical and Micromorphological Characteristics of Soils Subjected to Various Impacts. (In Japanese)  
https://agriknowledge.affrc.go.jp/RN/2010292728.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubotera, H. and Yamada, I. (1997) Characteristics of Induration of Tephra-Derived Soils in Kyushu. (2) Strength of Soil Block and Micromorphology of “Nigatsuchi”. Pedologist, 41, 32-41. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayashi, H., Tamura, K., Orimoto, M., Tsukamoto, S. and Higashi, T. (2007) Effectiveness of Long Term Application of Organic Matter from the Aspect of Micromorphology. Japanese Society of Soil Science and Planet Nutrition, 53, 364. (In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.20710/dohikouen.53.0_264_2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakatsuka, H. and Tamura, K. (2016) Characterisation of Soils under Long-Term Crop Cultivation without Fertilisers: A Case Study in JAPAN. SpringerPlus, 5, Article No. 283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1917-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubotera, H., Yamane, T., Wakiyama, Y. and Arakawa, Y. (2016) Long-Term Temporal Changes in Micromorphology of Cattle Manure Compost Pellets Mixed with Soils. Journal of the Japanese Society of Soil Physics, 134, 5-13. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mhindu, R.L., Wuta, M. and Ngorima, E. (2013) Composting of Selected Organic Wastes from Peri-Urban Areas of Harare, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 2, Article No. 14.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7715-2-14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ichikawa, T., lchikawa, A. and Urakawa, R. (2010) Composting of Forest Leaf Litter in Satoyama Preservation Activities—Changes in Chemical and Biological Characteristics of Forest Leaf Litter with Difference in Composting Years and the Effects on Plant Growth. Japanese Journal of Forest Environment, 52, 11-18. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aizawa, M., Inui, T., Hirai, H., Osawa, K., Ikeda, J. and Ohkubo, T. (2013) Yields of Fallen Leaves and the Compost from a Farm Forest and Their Efficacy for Paddy Rice Cultivation in a Hilly and Lower Mountainous Area in Northern Kanto. Japanese Journal of Forest Environment, 55, 119-126. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sugihara, S., Takahata, I. and Hosono, M. (1972) On the Kanto loam Bed and Topography of Musashino Upland, Kanto Plain. The Quaternary Research, 11, 29-39. (In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.4116/jaqua.11.29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Japan Meteorological Agency (2022) Data at Tokorozawa Meteorological Observatory. (In Japanese)  
http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/nml_amd_ym.php?prec_no=43&amp;block_no=1070&amp;year=&amp;month=&amp;day=&amp;elm=normal&amp;view</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Japan (2022) Digital Soil Map of Japan.  
https://soil-inventory.rad.naro.go.jp/figure.html?lat=35.831886&amp;lng=139.499068&amp;zoom=15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suzuki, J., Osawa, K. and Matsuoka, N. (2017) Characteristics and Restraint Measures of the Wind Erosion in Kanto-Koshin District. Journal of the Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, 85, 649-654. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Japan Meteorological Agency (2022) Data at Each Meteorological Observatory. (In Japanese)  
https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/nml_amd_ym.php?prec_no=43&amp;block_no=1070&amp;year=&amp;month=&amp;day=&amp;view=a3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miyoshi Town, Saitama Prefecture, Japan. (2022) The Historic Site. (In Japanese)  
https://www.town.saitama-miyoshi.lg.jp/kanko/rekishi/santomeshinden.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Inui, T. (1982) On the Significant Utilization of the Flatland Forests in Agriculture in the Western Suburbs of Tokyo. Geographical Review of Japan, 55, 549-565. (In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.4157/grj.55.549</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Japanese Society of Pedology (1997) Handbook for Soil Survey. Hakuyusha, Tokyo. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Committee of Soil Environmental Analysis (1997) Method of Soil Environmental Analysis. Hakuyusha, Tokyo. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagatsuka, S. and Tamura, K. (1986) An Application of Micropedology to the Study of Plant-Soil System—With Special Reference to Improvement of Method for Making Soil Thin Section. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 36, 163-168. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G., Tursina, T. and Babel, U. (1985) Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description. Waine Research Publications, England.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Saigusa, M. (2014) Effective Soil Depth. In: The Editorial Committee of an Encyclopedia of Soil, Ed., An Encyclopedia of Soil, Maruzen, Tokyo. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rumpel, C. and Kogel-Knabner, I. (2011) Deep Soil Organic Matter—A Key but Poorly Understood Component of Terrestrial C Cycle. Plant and Soil, 338, 143-158.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Higuchi, T. and Kashiwagi, S. (1993) Changes of Soil Morphological Characteristics and Organic Matter Content after Long-Term Cultivation in Andosols in Musashino Plateau, Japan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 39, 87-97.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1993.10416978</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ishii, H., Sato, N., Kawano, M., Mesaki, T. and Kawai, J. (2005) X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Rice and Rice Bran with a Dry Battery X-Ray Generator. Bunseki Kagaku, 54, 321-324. (In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.2116/bunsekikagaku.54.321</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Stoops, G., Gérard, M. and Arnalds, O. (2008) A Micromorphological Study of Andosol Genesis in Iceland. In: Kapur, S., Mermut, A. and Stoops, G., Ed., New Trends in Soil Micromorphology, Springer, Berlin, 67-89.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79134-8_5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stoops, G. (2007) Micromorphology of Soils Derived from Volcanic Ash in Europe: A Review and Synthesis. European Journal of Soil Science, 58, 356-377.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00903.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sedov, S.N., Solleiro-Robolledo, E. and Gama-Castro, J.E. (2003) Andosol to Luvisol Evolution in Central Mexico: Timing Mechanisms and Environmental Setting. CATENA, 54, 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00123-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kawai</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1969</year>)<article-title>Micromorphological Studies of Andosols in Japan</article-title><source> Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (Japan)</source><volume> 20</volume>,<fpage> 77</fpage>-<lpage>154</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagatsuka, S. (2014) Pedology, Revised and Enlarged Edition. Yokendo, Tokyo. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panin, P.G., Timireva, S.N., Morozova, T.D., Kononov, Y.M. and Velichko, A.A. (2018) Morphology and Micromorphology of the Loess-Paleosol Sequences in the South of the East European Plain (MIS 1-MIS 17). CATENA, 168, 79-101.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kawano, T., Sasaki, N., Hayashi, T. and Takahara, H. (2012) Grassland and Fire History since the Late-Glacial in Northern Part of Aso Caldera, Central Kyushu, Japan, Inferred from Phytolith and Charcoal Records. Quaternary International, 254, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2010.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Driesen, P., Deckers, J. and Spaargaren, O. (2001) Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World. World Soil Resource Reports. FAO, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blume, H.P. and Leinweber, P. (2004) Plaggen Soils: Landscape History, Properties, and Classification. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 167, 319-327.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420905</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macedo, R.S., Teixeira, W.G., Correa, M.M., Martins, G.C. and Vidal-Torrado, P. (2017) Pedogenetic Processes in Anthrosols with Pretic Horizon (Amazonian Dark Earth) in Central Amazon, Brazil. PLOS ONE, 12, e0178038.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brancier, J., Cammas, C., Todisco, D. and Fouache, E. (2014) A Micromorphological Assessment of Anthropogenic Features in Pre-Columbian French Guiana Dark Soils (FGDS): First Results. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, 58, 109-139.  
https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2014/S-00159</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayashi, H. (2006) Effect of Long-Term Application of Organic Materials into Soil Properties in the Field of Andosols. MSc Thesis, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122144-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rose, J., Lee, J.A., Kemp, R.A. and Harding, P.A. (2000) Palaeoclimate, Sedimentation and Soil Development during the Last Gracial Stage (Devensian), Heathrow Airport, London, UK. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19, 827-847.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00094-3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>