<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Immunology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-450X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oji.2022.124008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJI-122011</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Humoral Response to &lt;i&gt;Toxoplasma gondii&lt;/i&gt; in Pregnant Women in Bangui Central African Republic
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wilfrid</surname><given-names>Sylvain Nambei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Junior</surname><given-names>Ouefio Nguerenam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edwige</surname><given-names>Régina Kodia-Lenguetama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arsène</surname><given-names>Gbamonza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Community Hospital of Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>National Center of Blood Donor’s, Ministry of Public Health, Bangui, Central African Republic</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Science Biomedical, Faculty of Health Science, University of Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Toxoplasmosis is a cosmopolitan antrhropozoonosis widespread in mammals and birds. Normally asymptomatic in the subject health, it can have serious consequences for 
  the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy in the pregnant woman. It is in this context that we propose to assess the immune response to T. gondii in pregnant women in Bangui. This was a retrospective analytical study that consulted the records of pregnant women received in prenatal consultations at the Bangui Community Hospital Maternity ward from January 2019 to December 2019. Socio-demographic and laboratory data (IgM, IgG response to T. gondii) and results of HIV serology were collected from January to June 2021. Chi<sup>2</sup> test was used. A total of 307 pregnant women were analyzed. The average age of the women included was 28 (&#177;6) years. The average parity of the entire sample was 2.18 (&#177;1.93). Toxoplasmosis infectious was 14.65%. Women with a positive IgM response accounted for 17.58% and those with an IgG-positive response for 42.99%. Patients with a positive HIV were 5.86%. Patients aged 20
   
  -
   
  29 had a serological profile suggesting a probable ongoing infection (p = 0.010). The paucipares were more represented with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.23). Pregnant women were not significantly exposed to toxoplasmosis infectious (p = 0.96). Immunized and non-immunized subjects were similarly exposed [OR = 0.97; CI
   
  95% 0.4 = 6
   
  -
   
  2.05]. Toxoplasmosis remains particularly serious during pregnancy. Seroprevalence was significantly higher in the 20
   
  -
   
  24 year age group. Women were similarly exposed depending on whether they were immunized or not. This requires the establishment of a
   specific prevention program against this disease.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;T. gondii&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Humoral Response</kwd><kwd> HIV</kwd><kwd> Pregnant Women</kwd><kwd> Central African Republic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Toxoplasmosis, a cosmopolitan anthropozoonosis widespread in mammals and birds normally asymptomatic in healthy subjects, it can have serious consequences for the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy and in the immunocompromised subject [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref1">1</xref>]. The prevalence of toxoplasmosis is heterogeneous and varies by country. In Europe it varied by country: 19% - 29% in Spain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref2">2</xref>], 24% in Greece [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref3">3</xref>], 55% of pregnant women in France [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref4">4</xref>]. In Africa, it was 34.1% among pregnant women in Sudan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref5">5</xref>], 47.9% among pregnant women in the Central African Republic in 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref6">6</xref>], 81% in Gabon, 78% in Nigeria and 60% in C&#244;te d'Ivoire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref7">7</xref>]. Transmission in humans is by ingestion of cyst contained in the cooked meats and oocysts eliminated by the definitive host in nature soiling water and food. Transmission can also occur from the mother to the child causing severe congenital toxoplasmosis with various malformations and late onset ocular lesions. The risk of maternal-fetal transmission of congenital toxoplasmosis increases with the age of pregnancy at the time of maternal infection, Toxoplasma gondii infection is responsible for severe encephalitis in nearly 40% of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and causes the death of about a third of these patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref8">8</xref>]. Toxoplasmosis is one of the most common congenital infections in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref9">9</xref>]. It poses a significant threat, especially in early pregnancy, to the fetus because of the severity of the in utero manifestations and the devastating consequences for the infant. There is no vaccine to control this infection. It is in this context and in order to suggest a specific prevention programme that it seems appropriate to assess the immune to T. gondii in pregnant women in Central African Republic.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>This was an analytical retrospective study that consulted the records of pregnant women who received prenatal consultations (PNC) at the Bangui Community Hospital maternity ward from January to December 2019. Data was collected from January to June 2021.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Collection</title><p>The data collected concerned: 1) socio-demographic characteristics which included at the time of the PNC: age, number of children born alive (parity), place of residence (urban and semi-urban areas), 2) serological status and reaction title, 3) Laboratory analytical method for the determination of anti-toxoplasmic IgG and IgM antibodies by the use of TOXO-HAI FUMOUZE&#174; Diagnostics by indirect haemagglutination reaction on U-bottom microplate with a sensitivity on pure serum of 0.10 IU/ml. The Combs immunoenzymatic test was used for the detection of toxoplasmosis-specific immunoglobulins M (IgM) with sensitivity and specificity of 93.3% and 100% respectively. HIV serology was performed by the technique ELISA using Genscreen HIV1/2 from Biorad (ELISA 1) and Vironostika HIV Uni-FormII plus O of Biometrics (ELISA 2) according to the national HIV testing.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><p>The data was collected using a laboratory register using a collection sheet and entered on an Excel 2010 file and analyzed with Epi-info 7<sup>&#169;</sup> from CDC Atlanta and SPSS version 22. Measurements of central trend and dispersion were determined for age with a 95% confidence interval. The χ<sup>2</sup> test was used to compare the two proportions. The search for an association between the variables of the study namely; 1) socio-demographic variables (age, parity, place of residence), biological variables (IgM, IgG) and the occurrence of toxoplasmosis was done by logistic regression in multivariate analysis. The Odd ratio (ORs) was calculated as well as their confidence intervals, CI95%. For a p-value &lt; 0.05, the Odd ratio value favoured a statistically significant association.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Characteristic of Patients</title><p>A total of 307 cases of pregnant women were analyzed. Of these, 18 (5.86%) had HIV-positive serology. Toxoplasmic infection was 12.46%. The average age of pregnant women included was 28 ((&#177;16) years. The average parity for the entire sample was 2.18 (&#177;11.93). Similarly, the distribution of study subjects between semi-urban and urban areas was statistically similar with predominance (78.82%) in urban areas (p &gt; 0.05) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Distribution of IgM+ and IgG+ Antibodies by Study Variables</title><p>Women with a positive IgM response accounted for 17.58% or n = 54/307. Those with an IgG-Positive 42.99% or n = 132/307. The distribution by age group shows that patients aged 20 to 24 years had a serological profile suggesting a probable ongoing infection (p = 0.010). Similarly, this same age group was numerous in developing IgG antibody responses to the disease with a statistically different age group (p = 0.018). According to parity, the poor were more represented without any statistically significant difference (p = 0.23) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Association between Toxoplasmic Status and Study Variables</title><p>At any age pregnant women were not significantly exposed to toxoplasmic infection (p = 0.96). In addition, women with HIV-positive serology appeared to be exposed to toxoplasmic infection [OR = 1.19; CI 95% = 0.79 - 1.78]. Similarly,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic and laboratory characteristic of patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 307 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years), mean of age = 28 (&#177;6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (10.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 (24.42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78 (25.40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96 (31.28)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (8,8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity, mean of parity = 2.18 (&#177;1.93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nulliparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79 (25.73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125 (40.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103 (33.56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxoplasmic serology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (14.65)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n&#233;gative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262 (85.35)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV serology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (5.86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n&#233;gative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >289 (94.14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242 (78.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >semi urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 (21.18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of antibodies according to the variables studied</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables Effect</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Antibody response</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IgM+ n = 54 (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IgG+ n = 132 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Group of age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (18.52)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (9.84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (25.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 (43.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (24.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (21.97)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (14.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (13.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (16.66)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (10.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nulliparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (27.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (21.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (48.13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 (49.24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (24.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (29.54)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Bivariate analysis between toxoplasmic status and study variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Varibles Effect</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Toxoplasmic status n= 307</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ORbrut</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IC95%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IgM+, n = 54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IgG+, n = 132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[0.37 - 1.61]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (18.52)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (9.84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (25.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 (43.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (24.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (21.97)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (14.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (13.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (16.66)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (10.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV serology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[0.79 - 1.78]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (5.86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n&#233;gative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >289 (94.14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nulliparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (27.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (21.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (48.13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 (49.24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (24.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (29.54)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[0.82 - 1.99]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242 (78.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >semi-urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 (21.18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Immunized status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[0.46 - 2.05]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Immunized</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186 (60.58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non Immunized</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121 (39.42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>according to the immune status of women, immunized subjects and non-immunized persons are equally exposed [OR = 0.97; CI 95% 0.4 = 6 - 2.05] with no statistically positive difference (p = 0.96) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Toxoplasmic infection is one of the most common congenital infections in the world. It poses a significant threat, especially in early pregnancy, to the fetus because of the severity of the in utero manifestations and the devastating consequences for the infant. The risk of congenital toxoplasmosis is often higher in co-infected HIV-Toxoplasmosis mothers than in monoinfected toxoplasmosis-only mothers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref10">10</xref>]. The average age of our patients was 28 &#177; 6 years in this study. These results are similar to some previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref11">11</xref>]. The seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis was 14.65% during this work. This seroprevalence was non-significantly high (p = 0.96) in the 20 - 24 year age group (24.42%) and in the paucipares (40.71%). These results corroborate those of some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref11">11</xref>] who had previously shown that the seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women varied by socio-demographic characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref12">12</xref>]. This age variation was an expected outcome for an immunizing condition. Differences in the residence of seroprevalence observed in this study were already reported by some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref13">13</xref>]. This disparity could be explained by differences in dietary behaviour depending on the location of the residence where seroprevalence would be correlated to the temperate and humid climate promoting oocyst conservation in the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref13">13</xref>]. Our study showed lower proportions of IgM and IgG antibodies anti T. gondii in pregnant women with a significant difference (p = 0.018) by age group but not statistically significant by parity (p = 0.23). Our results differ from those obtained in previous work where the authors had shown much higher proportions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref14">14</xref>]. This difference between our results could likely be due to the use of the indirect haemagglutination technique which could lead to misinterpretation and lead to an underestimation of seroprevalence. This is a limitation in this study. Similarly, the study population differs from that used in some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref6">6</xref>]. Furthermore, depending on the immune status, immune and non-immune women are equally exposed to toxoplasmic infection [OR = 0.97; CI 95% = 0.46 - 2.05]. These results assumed that pregnant women, residing in the environment where the parasite circulates, are exposed to recurrent infection, reinfection or even reactivation of a chronic T. gondii infection. Nevertheless, many of the studies have shown that congenital toxoplasmosis due to reactivation of maternal infection is less common than that usually observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref17">17</xref>]. In addition, our results showed that women with HIV-positive serology appeared to be exposed to toxoplasmic infection. Our results are in line with those obtained in previous work where the authors showed varying proportions in Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref18">18</xref>] and Burkina Faso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref19">19</xref>] in HIV-infected subjects. However, the proportion of vertical transmission of T. gondii infection in pregnant HIV+ infected women previously exposed to T. gondii is not yet well defined. Nevertheless, many of the studies have shown that congenital toxoplasmosis due to reactivation of maternal infection is less common than that usually observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.122011-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Toxoplasmosis remains particularly serious during pregnancy. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection was lower in this study. It was also significantly higher in the 20 - 24 age group. There was no significant difference between urban and semi-urban areas. Women were similarly exposed depending on whether they were immunized or not. This requires the establishment of a specific prevention program against this disease.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>WSN conceived, designed, conducted the experiments, analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. JON read and approved the final manuscript. GA collected the data and REKL read and approved the final manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Funding</title><p>No funding received.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Institutional Review Board Statement</title><p>This study protocol received full approval from the local Ethics committee of Health Science Faculty of University of Bangui and was conducted in compliance with the declaration of Helsinki. Approval reference number 18/FACSS/CES/21.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Data Availability Statement</title><p>Data is contained within the article.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nambei, W.S., Nguerenam Jr., O., Kodia-Lenguetama, E.R. and Gbamonza, A. (2022) Humoral Response to Toxoplasma gondii in Pregnant Women in Bangui Central African Republic. Open Journal of Immunology, 12, 122-129. https://doi.org/10.4236/oji.2022.124008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.122011-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, J.L., Lopez, A., Wilson, M., et al. (2001) Congenital Toxoplasmosis: A Review. Obstetrical &amp; Gynecological Survey, 56, 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200105000-00025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gutierrez-Zufiaurre, N., Sanchez-Hernandez, J., Munoz, S., et al. (2004) Seroprevalence of Antibodies against Treponema pallidum, Toxoplasma gondii, Rubella Virus, Hepatitis B and C and HIV in Pregnant Women. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, 22, 512-516. https://doi.org/10.1157/13067618</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diza, E., Frantzidou, F., Souliou, E., et al. (2005) Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Northen Greece during the Last 20 Years. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 11, 719-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01193.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ancelle, T., Goulet, V., Tirad-Flury, V., Baril, L., et al. (1996) La toxoplasmose chez la femme enceinte en France en 1995. Résultats d’une enquête nationale périnatale. BEH, 51, 227-229.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elnahas, A., Gerais, A.S., Elbashir, M.I., Eldien, E.S. and Adam, I. (2003) Toxoplasmosis in Pregnant Sudanese Women. Saudi Medical Journal, 24, 868-870.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nambei, W.S., Gamba, E.P., Tekpa, G. and Gbangbangai, E. (2016) Infection à T gondii chez les femmes enceintes infectées et non infectées par le VIH en Centrafrique. RAMReS Sciences de la Sante, 4, 4-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dubey, J.P. (1998) Advances in the Life Cycle of Toxoplasma gondii. International Journal for Parasitology, 28, 1019-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00023-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunlop, O., Rootwelt, V., Sannes, M., et al. (1996) Risk of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in AIDS Patients: Indication for Prophylaxis. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 28, 71-73. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365549609027153</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weiss, L.M. and Dubey, J.P. (2009) Toxoplasmosis: A History of Clinical Observations. International Journal for Parasitology, 39, 895-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odongo Osinde, M., Kakaire, O. and Kabonge, K.D. (2012) Sexually Transmitted Infections in HIV-Infected Patients in Kabala Hospital, Uganda. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 6, 276-282. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.1754</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Powers, K.A., Poole, C., Pettifor, A.E. and Cohen, M.S. (2008) Rethinking Heterosexual Infectivity of HIV-1: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 8, 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70156-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma&amp;#239;ga, I., Kiemtoré, P. and Tounkara, A. (2001) Prevalence of Anti-Toxoplasma Antibodies in Patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Blood Donors in Bamako. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique, 94, 268-270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akanmu, A.S., Asunkalu, V.O., Ofomah, J.N. and Olowosenlu, F.O. (2010) Pattern of Demographic Risk Factors in the Seroprevalence of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies in HIV Infected Patients at Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Quarterly Journal of Hospital Medicine, 20, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.4314/nqjhm.v20i1.57974</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savi de Tové, Y.S., Hounto, A.O., Vodouhe, M.V., et al (2018) Séroprévalence et facteurs associés à la toxoplasmose chez la femme enceinte en milieu rural au Bénin. Pan African Medical Journal, 29, Article No. 112. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.112.14071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Minkoff, H., Remington, J.S. and Holman, S. (1997) Vertical Transmission of Toxoplasma by Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Women. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 176, 555-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70547-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lebeach, M., Larsen, S.O. and Peterson, E. (1993) Prevalence, Incidence and Geographical Distribution of Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies in Pregnant Women in Demark. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 25, 751-756. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365549309008574</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hajsoleimani, F., Ataeian, A., Nourian, A.A. and Mazloomzadeh, S. (2012) Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Pregnant Women and Bioassay of IgM Positive Cases in Zanjan Northwest of Iran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology, 7, 82-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Makuwa, M., Loemba, H., Ngouonimba, J., et al. (1994) Sérologie de la toxoplasmose et du cytomégalovirus des malades infectes par le VIH au Congo. Cahiers Sante, 4, 15-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.122011-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ledru, E., Diagbouga, S., Ledru, S., et al. (1995) A Study of Toxoplasma and Cytomegalovirus in Tuberculosis and HIV-Infected Patients in Burkina Faso. Acta Tropica, 59, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-706X(95)00073-N</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>