<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ICA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Intelligent Control and Automation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-0653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ica.2022.133003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ICA-121571</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Smart Strategy for Blocking the Distance Protection Function during VT Fuse Failure
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>M. Eltamaly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amer</surname><given-names>Nasr A. Elghaffar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Alfanar Engineering Service, Alfanar Company, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Saving the electrical power system in stable condition is considered as one of important challenges to avoid any failure of high voltage equipment. Additionally, with the increasing off the critical loads
  , 
  it’s very important to use the accurate protection system that can deal with any abnormal condition. This paper stud
  ies
   one of critical cases that can effect on the coordination of the protection system with the faults during fuse fail condition. Over Head transmission line (OHTL) is the most part in the power system that faces the disturbances, which can be protected by multi-protection functions as line differential function, distance protection function, over current, earth fault, over/under voltage
   
  etc.
   
  The distance protection function is depending on the line voltage and the load current to calculate the load zone. This paper aims to prevent the falls operation of distance protection function during voltage transformer fuse failure condition.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Protection System</kwd><kwd> High Voltage</kwd><kwd> Distance Protection</kwd><kwd> Power System Quality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>With the population growth and the increase of the life standers, the electrical power system has been extended to absorb the required demand power. Besides, the electrical power system became more complex, which leads to classifying the power system to distribution, transmission, and generation to be easy for controlling and saving the reliable and stable system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref1">1</xref>]. Therefore, the search for better quality systems is a major highlight for researchers and power system designers to provide customers with reliable, ideal and intolerant power systems. The main objective of using power system protection is to detach the faulty section from the system to make the rest of the portion work without any disturbance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref2">2</xref>]. The main idea for using the protection system is to restrict the disturbances during any abnormal condition in the power system, such as faults or equipment failures. The important required action from protection system is isolating a limited disturbed area to continue the power distribution in the balance areas. Sensitivity, selectivity and speed are three important points that are commonly used to describe the functional characteristics of any protective-relaying. There are standard points that should follow in terms of protection system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref3">3</xref>]. Protection relays are that the important characteristic of power system protection helps to isolate the faculty part of the electrical system. However, this relay needs to possess certain qualities, such as dependability and selectivety. Over Head Transmission Line (OHTL) is a very important part of the electrical system, which is linked between the generation and the distribution system. The short circuit faults can be classified into symmetrical faults and unsymmetrical faults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref4">4</xref>]. The Symmetrical 3-phase faults occur in the system by 5% from the total percentage faults in the power system. The other faults are named as the unsymmetrical faults that are one line to ground (L-G), which occurs by 85% from the faults, line with line fault (LL) which occurs by 10% from the total percentage faults in the power system. Faults occur insulation failure or any abnormal weather condition. So, the protection system should operate to isolate the fault zone to save the power system stability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref5">5</xref>]. The basic operation logic of the protection system is depending on the fault current, voltage value and locations. The power flow from the generation to the utility grid is a high dynamic network connecting via OHTL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>There are some abnormal conditions in the power system, that can lead to the loss of synchronism between the generation and the load, for example at isolating high-loads from the system, at tripping of one of the generation systems, and at these cases, the mechanical power is not equalized with the required for the electrical loads [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref7">7</xref>]. A distance protection relay is a name given to the protection, whose action depends on the distance of the feeding point to the fault as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The time of operation of such protection is a function of the ratio of voltage and current, i.e., impedance. This impedance between the relay and the fault depends on the electrical distance between them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref8">8</xref>]. The distance protection function is depending on the load impedance, which continuously calculates the load impedance value by using the transmission line voltage and the load current. The distance protection relay operates only when the ratio of voltage and current falls below a set value. During a fault, the current magnitude increases and the voltage at the fault point decreases. The voltage at the potential transformer region depends on the distance between the PT and the fault. Due to the current transformer and voltage transformer error’s value, it’s not practical</p><p>to adjust the distance protection tripping time to operate instantaneously by zero-time delay for 100% of the protected transmission line, also the errors can shift the out of zone fault to the protected area. Hence, the distance protection instantaneous trip is typically set to cover 80% from OHTL which is called the first zone, and the remaining 20% of OHTL can be covered by the time delay of the second zone trip, where the second zone is covered 100% of OHTL and between 20% to 50% of the next small OHTL. In another hand, by assuming the voltage source is failed through a voltage fuse fail, the base operation of the distance protection function will calculate the load impedance as a very low value which will cause a false trip command to the transmission line. Digital technology provides guarantee for the smoothness of network information. Under the premise of ensuring the intelligentization of equipment, the advantages of network information application are given full play to unify the control of the distribution device in the substation system. Primary intelligence and secondary network are the most significant characteristics of smart substation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref9">9</xref>]. This article aims to describe the importance of using the VT fuse fail functions for blocking the distance protection function to prevent false operation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Faults Analysis in Transmission System</title><p>To analyze the fault, it’s important to simulate the fault in three components that’s positive sequence and negative sequence and zero sequences, as shown in the below <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> for positive, negative and zero sequence components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Firstly, the Change in magnitude:</p><p>a = 1 ∠ 120 ˚ (1)</p><p>a 2 = 1 ∠ 240 ˚ (2)</p><p>a 3 = 1 ∠ 360 ˚ (3)</p><p>From these equations, useful combinations can arrive</p><p>1 − a = 3 ∠ − 30 ˚</p><p>a 2 − a = 3 ∠ 270 ˚ (4)</p><p>Or</p><p>1 + a + a 2 = 0</p><p>1 − a 2 = 3 ∠ 30 ˚ (5)</p><p>Or</p><p>a − a 2 = 3 ∠ 90 ˚ (6)</p><p>Any three-phase system of phasors will always be the sum of the three components.</p><p>“+VE” sequence: V a 1 V b 1 V c 1</p><p>“−VE” sequence: V a 2 V b 2 V c 2</p><p>“0” sequence: V a 0 V b 0 V c 0</p><p>The original system phase components can be presented from V<sub>a</sub>, V<sub>b</sub> and V<sub>c</sub></p><p>[ V a = V a 0 + V a 1 + V a 2 V b = V b 0 + V b 1 + V b 2 V c = V c 0 + V c 1 + V c 2 ] (7)</p><p>From Equations (1) to (5) Zero sequence component</p><p>V a 0 = V b 0 = V c 0</p><p>Positive sequence component</p><p>V b 1 = a 2 V a 1 , V c 1 = a V a 1</p><p>Negative sequence component</p><p>V b 2 = a V a 2 , V c 2 = a 2 V a 2</p><p>V<sub>a</sub>, V<sub>b</sub> and V<sub>c</sub> can be expressed in terms of phase “a” component only as:</p><p>V a = V a 0 + V a 1 + V a 2</p><p>V b = V a 0 + a 2 V a 1 + a V a 2</p><p>V c = V a 0 + a V a 1 + a 2 V a 2</p><p>This equation can be accomplished in a matrix form:</p><p>[ V a V b V c ] = [ 1 1 1 1 a 2 a 1 a a 2 ] [ V a 0 V a 1 V a 2 ] (8)</p><p>Equation (8) can be written as:</p><p>A = [ 1 1 1 1 a 2 a 1 a a 2 ] , [ V a V b V c ] = A [ V a 0 V a 1 V a 2 ]</p><p>This equation can be reversed in order to obtain the positive, negative and zero sequences from the system phasors.</p><p>[ V a 0 V a 1 V a 2 ] = A − 1 [ V a V b V c ] (9)</p><p>With considering,</p><p>A − 1 = 1 3 [ 1 1 1 1 a a 2 1 a 2 a ]</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Distance Protection Topology</title><p>OHTL has an impedance per kilometer related to its design and construction which will be a function of OHTL length. The distance protection function looks at load current and the grid voltage, that use these values for impedance calculation related to Ohm’s law. Conventional time-stepped distance protection is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The delayed second zones can be accelerated by confirming the fault into the protected zones depending on the communication scheme as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref11">11</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Distance Protection Solution during VT Fail</title><p>It’s not practical to design the distance protection that can operate during the non-fault condition regarding the failure of feed the voltage to the measurement unit, that will consider the calculation in the protected zone. Using the fuse fail functional to block the distance protection is very important to prevent the false</p><p>operation of the distance protection function. The proposed solution in this paper is presented in three ways to block the distance function as shown in the below <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> for an example to block distance protection zone-1 and zone-2 respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref13">13</xref>].</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Adding an Auxiliary Contact to VT MCB</title><p>It’s very important to protect the voltage transformer from the short circuit. The short circuit will consume a very high current which direct will damage the voltage transformer secondary coil. That can protect by fuses or Miniature Circuit Breaker (MCB). So, by using an auxiliary contact from the secondary connection from the miniature circuit breaker to be used as a binary input to the distance for block the function. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the adding of auxiliary contact to the VT miniature circuit breaker.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Adding Fuse Fail to Relay</title><p>This way is depending on the fuse fail relay that can feed on both winding in the line voltage transformer to compare both measuring coils with using the binary output from the fuse fail relay to be used a binary input for blocking the distance protection relay as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Using Internal Fuse Fail Function</title><p>In the numerical distance protection relay, it’s possible to use the internal fuse fail function which depends on the changing in the voltage and currents, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref14">14</xref>]. During the faults, the voltage will decrease and the current will increase, but if the voltage became zero and the current is not affected its means the VT is failed and there is no actual fault in the transmission line which direct will block the distance protection function.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Simulation and Case Study</title><p>The proposed analysis in this part has been validated with the protection numerical relays to shows the test result created by the secondary injection kit</p><p>software to simulate the distance protection function during symmetrical fault analysis. Also, this part simulates the distance blocking during VT fuse fail.</p><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Simulation Three Phase Distance Protection Function</title><p>The simulated experiment in this paper used by a secondary injection kit, the operating voltage for the simulated system is 115 kV, the voltage transformer ratio is (115 kV/115V) and the current transformer ratio is (1200 A/1A) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121571-ref12">12</xref>]. This experiment simulated by a protection IEDs type distance protection relay with three phase symmetrical fault. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 shows the quadrature impedance for</p><p>distance protection symmetrical fault which discusses the boundaries results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 shows the created test result for the trip time, which discusses the boundaries results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. VT Fuse Fail Simulation</title><p>The simulation of VT fuse fail can be implemented by normal load injection to the protection distance relay, with applying setting of VT MCB trip after healthy condition. The below <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the distance function protection blocking for distance zone faults.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Rapidly growing electricity demand deregulated electricity market systems, and restructured operation of power delivery systems are stressed the power grid operation. In such a situation, the speed of fault clearance is very important to</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Impedance results at symmetrical fault simulation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R (Ω)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X (Ω)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z (Ω)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z phi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zones</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.779</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.719</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.506</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.332</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.363</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.329</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.487</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.815</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.671</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.464</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.354</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.935</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.501</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >286.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Timing test results at symmetrical fault simulation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R (Ω)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X (Ω)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z (Ω)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z phi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Setting Time - Second</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Trip Time - Second</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zone</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.771</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.958</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.514</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.685</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.542</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.985</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.771</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.371</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.829</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.685</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.471</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.829</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> VT fuse fail simulation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zone No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >With VT fail</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Without VT fail</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Forward</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blocked</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.0 msec</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 Forward</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blocked</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >439 msec</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 Reverse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blocked</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >830 msec</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 Forward</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blocked</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 Sec</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>maintain the system stability. Distance protection primarily uses two zones of protection to cover protection for the entire line distance. Typically, zone-1 covers 80% of the protected line length and operates instantaneously and Zone-2 is set to be an intentional overreaching zone to cover the 100% protected line. Zone-2 operates with a predefined time delay of about 15 - 20 cycles (300 - 400 ms). But it’s not correct to design the distance protection that can operate during the non-fault condition regarding the failure of feeding the voltage to the measurement unit, which will consider the calculation in the protected zone. Using the fuse fail to function to block the distance protection is very important to prevent the false operation of the distance protection function. The proposed solution in this paper is presented in three ways. The first presented way is using an auxiliary contact from the secondary connection from the miniature circuit breaker to be used as a binary input to the distance for block the function. The second presented way is depending on the fuse fail relay that can feed from both winding in the line voltage transformer to compare both measuring coils with using the binary output from the fuse fail relay to be used a binary input for blocking the distance protection relay. The third way is depending on the internal fuse failing to function in the distance relay for blocking the distance relay.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Eltamaly, A.M. and Elghaffar, A.N.A. (2022) A Smart Strategy for Blocking the Distance Protection Function during VT Fuse Failure. Intelligent Control and Automation, 13, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.4236/ica.2022.133003</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.121571-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">[1]Eltamaly, M., Sayed, Y., El-Sayed, A.H.M. and Elghaffar, A.A. (2020) Adaptive Static Synchronous Compensation Techniques with the Transmission System for Optimum Voltage Control. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11, 35-44.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elghaffar, A.N.A. (2021) Development Steps of Protection and Control System in High Voltage Substations. El Ruha 9th International Conference on Social Sciences, Sanliurfa, 15-16 August 2021, 305-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elbaset, A.A., Sayed, Y. and Elghaffar, A.A. (2016) Mathematical Calculation of Electromagnetic Field in High Voltage Substation. Annals of Faculty Engineering Journal, 14, 139-146.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eltamaly, A.M. and Elhghaffar, A.N.A. (2019) HVDC over HVAC Transmission System: Fault Conditions Stability Study. International Journal of Research Studies in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 5, 24-37.https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-9436.0501004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bunnoon, P. (2013) Fault Detection Approaches to Power System: State-of-the-Art Article Reviews for Searching a New Approach in the Future. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 3, 553-560. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v3i4.3195</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akinbulire, T.O., Oluseyi, P.O. and Esumeh, C.I. (2008) Optimal Relay Performance Using Advanced Fault Diagnostic Techniques. RE &amp; PQJ, 1, 628-633. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj06.393</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eltamaly, A., Sayed, Y., El-Sayed, A.-H.M., Abdelaziz, M.M. and Elghaffar, A.N.A. (2020) Power Quality and Reliability Considerations of Photovoltaic Distributed Generation. Technology and Economics of Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy Journal, 5, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40866-020-00096-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eltamaly, A.M. and Elghaffar, A.N.A. (2017) Modeling of Distance Protection Logic for Out-of-Step Condition in Power System. Electrical Engineering, 100, 1891-1899.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-017-0667-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, K. and Li, W. (2019) Research on Reliability of Relaying Protection in Smart Substation. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7, 333-338. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2019.72024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eltamaly, A., Elghaffar, A.N.A., et al. (2021) AC Microgrid Protection Coordination. Chapter 8, Wiley Book (Microgrid Technologies), eBook 2021.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119710905.ch8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sayed, Y., Elbaset, A.A. and Elghaffar, A.N.A. (2020) IEC 61850 Communication Protocol with the Protection and Control Numerical Relays for Optimum Substation Automation System. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.132.01</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, E. and Elghaffar, A.N.A. (2019) Advanced Control Techniques for Enhancing the Power System Stability at OOS Condition. Insight-Energy Science, 2, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18282/i-es.v2i1.89</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ABB RELION650 SERIES “Line Differential Protection” RED650Version 2.2, Document ID: 1MRK 505 393-UEN, Issued: May 2017 Revision: Product Version: 2.2, and PCM 2.9 Software for ABB RED-650.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121571-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Technical Manual “Current Differential Protection Relay”, MiCOM P543, P544, P545, P546 Platform Hardware Version: K, Platform Software Version: 45 &amp; 55, Publication Reference: P54x/EN M/La4 P54x/EN M/Ka4+Kb4, and GE Micom Agile S1 Software Version 2.14 for P546 Relay.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>