<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2022.1011021</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-121481</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Epidemiological Aspects and Compliance with Post-Exposure Prophylaxis of People Bitten by a Dog and Received at the Buanionzi State Health Center in Boma, DR Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean-Claude</surname><given-names>Kikwata Ifaka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexis</surname><given-names>Keya Sumbu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lionel</surname><given-names>Bahinzi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Albert</surname><given-names>Pongo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Benjamin</surname><given-names>Longo-Mbenza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christophe</surname><given-names>Mambueni Thamba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Faculty of Public Health, Lomo University of Research, Kinshasa, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Surgery Department, General Reference Hospital of Boma, Boma, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Buanionzi State Health Center, Boma, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Red Cross Clinic Health Center, Boma, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Microbiology, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Diocesan Office of Medical Works (BDOM-KIN), Kinshasa, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>258</fpage><lpage>264</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: To describe and analyze the epidemiological aspects as well as the observance of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of people bitten by a dog and received at the Buanionzi State Health Center from 2014 to 2017. 
  Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study which took place in two stages. The first interview was an interrogation carried out at the health Center until surgical trimming (100% of cases) followed by PEP (70.3% of cases) according to the Essen protocol. The second time was a 24 h telephone interview after a missed appointment for a dose of PEP. 
  Results: The prevalence was 5.6 bites/10.000 people. The average age was 26.4 &#177; 18.3 years. Age ≤ 26 years was more concerned with 59.3% of cases (p = 0.006) in which children &lt; 15 and 5 - 15 years old represented 60.5% (p = 0.003) and 57% (p = 0.04) of cases respectively. The male sex accounted for 55.9% (p = 0.009). Residents of Kabondo were the most affected with 40% followed by Kalamu with 29.7% (p = 0.003). 70.3% of people started a PEP (p = 0.01). Completeness was 1.9% and 78.4% received one dose of vaccine. 
  Conclusion: The rabies risk is potential in Boma. Efforts in terms of public health strategies must be made to reduce it.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Epidemiological Aspects</kwd><kwd> Observance</kwd><kwd> Post-Exposure Prophylaxis</kwd><kwd> Dog Bite</kwd><kwd> Buanionzi State Health Centre</kwd><kwd> Boma</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Rabies is a concern in the world. It affects more than 150 countries and territories and kills tens of thousands of people every year. Over 98% of human deaths are the result of a rabid dog bite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Children under the 15 years and people living in rural areas of Asia and Africa are the most vulnerable. These deaths can be avoided thanks to Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP), which includes anti-rabies vaccination combined in some situations with serotherapy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref9">9</xref>]. However, the drop-out rate is high in low-income countries due to the refusal of animal owners to take care of the victims as well as the lack of means to buy the vaccine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref10">10</xref>]. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), particularly in Boma, rabies is endemic. However, there are still problems of awareness, staff training, health and veterinary structuring and the supply of prophylactic drugs causing shortage. Moreover, the high price of these drugs explains the reluctance of suppliers to make them a permanent stock at the risk of expiry.</p><p>Also it discourages people, often poor, from spontaneously adhering to prophylaxis or continuing it. This study describes and analyzes the epidemiological aspects and compliance post-exposure prophylaxis of people bitten by a dog and received at the Buanionzi State Health Center in Boma.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Framework</title><p>This study took place at the Buanionzi State Health Center, located in the courtyard of the Boma General Reference Hospital (GRH) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), in the Buanionzi Health Area, Boma Urban Health Zone (BUHZ) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>This Center carries out a minimum package of preventive and curative care activities. During the study period, the team was made up of: a Coordinating doctor; three second-cycle Medical Students; a head Nurse from the center or his Assistant. The study population consisted of 145 people bitten by a dog (World Health Organization Category three exposures) and received at the Center.</p><p>They came from three municipalities of Boma (Nzadi, Kalamu and Kabondo) and the neighboring agglomerations (Km8 and Manterne). Boma is a port City located in southwest of the DR Congo in the Province of Kongo Central, 470 Km from Kinshasa, 140 Km from Tshela, 125 Km from Matadi and 117 Km from Muanda. Its area is 65 Km<sup>2</sup>, a population of 254.842 inhabitants (Source: Boma Urban Health Zone).</p><p>The sampling was of convenience of 145 cases.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methodology</title><p>This study was a cross-sectional with a descriptive and analytical, conducted from February 2014 to December 2017.</p><p>It took place in two stages:</p><p>&#183; The first interview was an interrogation carried out by a nurse from the Centre. Then, the case was presented to the head nurse or his assistant for surgical trimming according to WHO standards and PEP consisting of anti-rabies vaccine according to the Essen protocol or Serum if the non-immune victim buys it. The vaccines used were VERORAB, RABIFORT and CHIRON. The serum was from the Institute of India lot 1489TO16 (2000 IU ampoule).</p><p>&#183; The second time was a 24 H hour telephone interview after a missed appointment for a dose of PEP. This time was provided by the head nurse.</p><p>It was from the register of the Center that the students collected the data using a pre-established form.</p><p>These data concern:</p><p>- Socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, residence);</p><p>- PEP administration;</p><p>- PEP compliance.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis of Data</title><p>The statistical exploitation questionnaire was carried out with the student test. The statistics were performed using the Statistical Package of Social Science for Windows (IBM SPSS) version 28 software. The results were presented as frequency and percentage.</p><p>For the biochemical parameters, the statistical treatment was carried out using a student test, the comparison test with two independent samples. Furthermore, the percentage comparison was carried out using the khi-2 test.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Ethics Committee</title><p>The confidentiality of patient information was guaranteed at all times and the data was anonymized during coding.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>During the study period, 145 people were bitten by dogs. This represents a prevalence of 5.6 bites per 10.000 people.</p><p>&#183; The average age was 26.4 &#177; 18.3 years with extremes ranging from 1 to 80 years. Individuals ≤ 26 years were more affected with 59.3% (p = 0.006). In this group, children under 15 years of age were more affected in 60.5% of cases (p = 0.003), while those between 5 and 15 years of age accounted for 57% of cases (p = 0.040).</p><p>&#183; The male sex was the most affected with 55.9% of cases (p = 0.009).</p><p>&#183; Residents of the commune of Kabondo were more affected with 40% of cases, followed by those of the commune of Kalamu with 29.7% of cases (p = 0.003) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>&#183; 102 people (70.3% of cases) started a PEP (p = 0.01).</p><p>&#183; Regarding compliance with PEP, completeness was 1.9%, while those who received a dose of vaccine accounted for 78.4% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> General characteristic of the study population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n(%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59 (40.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (59.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (60.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (39.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (57.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (38.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feminine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 (44.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81 (55.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kabondo Commune</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 (40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kalamu Commune</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (29.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nzadi Commune</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (25.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Km8 and Manterne</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (4.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Administration of PEP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non recur dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (29.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At least one dose received</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102 (70.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Compliance (completeness) of rabies prophylaxis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of prophylaxies</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n = 102 (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 dose of Serum (40 UI/Kg IM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 dose of vaccine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 (78.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 doses of vaccine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (7.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 doses of vaccine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (8.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 doses of vaccine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 doses of vaccine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.9)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>&#183; On the other hand, five people who had not received rabies prophylaxis developed clinical symptoms and signs of rabies in an average incubation period of 41 days with extremes ranging from 26 days to 3 months. They were admitted to the Boma HGR where they all died. All biting dogs were found alive.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>1) The prevalence of bites: we found 5.6 bites per 10.000 people. This high prevalence would be explained by the presence of occasional or permanent stray dogs favored by urbanization mainly thanks to the waste produced, the development of commensal fauna housing animals likely to transmit the disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>2) Age: we found that people ≤ 26 years were more at risk in 59.3% of cases, including 60.5% of cases under 15 years of age and 57 % between 5 and 15 years of age.</p><p>This corroborates Sylla et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref12">12</xref>] who found that children under 15 years of age represented almost half of subjects (48.02%). For our series 35.8% of cases were related to children and adolescents under 15 years of age. The age group most at risk was 10 - 19 years, with 33.1% of cases involving children and adolescents under 15years of age. In fact, the population under 15 years consider dogs to be friends of companions, toys and constantly subject them to provocations (surprise, separate, oppose, dogs).</p><p>3) Sex: we found that the male sex was more exposed with 55.9% of cases. This explained by the fact that in Africa, the dog is more companion of the man especially children and adolescents under 15 years of age than the woman. In our series all age groups were affected by both deaths with the exception of the 80 - 89 age groups. There was no significant difference between the proportions of women and men except between the ages of 10 - 19 when men were mostly more biased than women.</p><p>4) Residence: we found that residents of the commune of Kabondo were more exposed followed by the commune of Kalamu with 40% and 29.7% respectively. In fact, these 2 communes constitute canister cities where the garbage cans are next to houses, often not fenced, thus promoting the attraction of stray dogs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref13">13</xref>]. For our series of 86 cases of the population ≤ 26 years, 60 cases (69.8%) were returned to these 2 communes of which 38 (44.2%) for Kabondo and 22 (25.6%) for Kalamu.</p><p>5) The administration of the PEP: we found that 102 victims had stared PEP, 2 with SAR and 100 with VAR. However, completeness was 1.9%. This will be explained by: the lack of financial means for the dog owner and/or the dog bitten to have treatment or access to treatment as a result of the cost; refusal of the owners to have the dog bitten treated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121481-ref14">14</xref>]; refusal of the owners to recognize his dog; lack of sufficient information on the severity of the rabies and its real existence in Boma; absence of an Anti-Rabies Centre in Boma.</p><p>6) Adherence to PEP: we found that the majority of victims (78.4%) received only one dose of vaccine. This could be explained by lack of financial means; lack of information on the different protocols to be followed; illusion that people are fully immunized after 1 dose.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Rabies is a reality in Boma, with a high prevalence of bites. Efforts should be made in awareness raising, staff training medical and veterinary structuring, procurement and cost of PEP to minimize its impact.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Limit and Strength</title><p>Our study points to a limit of not having determined the areas of the bites, the characteristics of the wounds, the motive of the aggression and the characteristics of the dogs. However, this study has the merit of having determined the incubation period of rabies in Boma.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>All authors have contributed, read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Funding</title><p>This research received no external funding.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are thankful to all who participated in the study</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ifaka, J.-C.K., Sumbu, A.K., Bahinzi, L., Pongo, A., Longo-Mbenza, B. and Thamba, C.M. (2022) Epidemiological Aspects and Compliance with Post-Exposure Prophylaxis of People Bitten by a Dog and Received at the Buanionzi State Health Center in Boma, DR Congo. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 10, 258-264. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2022.1011021</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.121481-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wallace, R.M., Bhavnani, D., Russell, J., Zaki, S., Muehlenbachs, A., Hayden-Pinneri, K., Aplícano, R.M., Peruski, L., Vora, N.M., Balter, S., Elson, D., Lederman, E., Leeson, B., McLaughlin, T., Waterman, S., Fonseca-Ford, M., Blanton, J., Franka, R., Velasco-Villa, A., Niezgoda, M., Orciari, L., Recuenco, S., Damon, I., Hanlon, C., Jackson, F., Dyer, J., Wadhwa, A., Robinson, L., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2014) Rabies Death Attributed to Exposure in Central America with Symptom Onset in a U.S. Detention Facility—Texas, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 446-449.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aubry, P. and Gaüzère, B.-A. (2020) Rage Actualités 2020. Médecine Tropicale.http://www.medecinetropicale.com/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS. Principaux repères de l’OMS sur la rage.https://www.who.int/fr/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rabies</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parize, P., Dacheux, L. and Bourhy, H. (2020) Rage Humaine. EMC-Maladies Infectieuses, 37, 1-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mindekem, R., Lechenne, M., Alfaroukh, I.O., Moto, D.D., Zinsstag, J., Ouedraogo, L.T. and Salifou, S. (2017) Evaluation des Connaissances-Attitudes-Pratiques des populations des districts sanitaires de Benoye, Laoukassy, Moundou et N’Djaména Sud sur la rage canine au Tchad [Evaluation of Knowledge-Attitudes-Practices of the populations in the health districts of Benoye, Laoukassy, Moundou and South N’Djamena towards canine rabies in Chad]. The Pan African Medical Journal, 27, 24. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.27.24.11464</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fooks, A.R., Banyard, A.C., Horton, D.L., et al. (2014) Current Status of Rabies and Prospects for Elimination. Lancet, 384, 1389-1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62707-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Organisation for Animal Health (2014) Protecting Animals, Preserving Our Future Rabies Still Kills, What Are We Waiting for to Act? Bull.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization, WHO (2013) Expert Consultation on Rabies. WHO Technical Report, Geneva, p. 150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiembré, I., Bi, J.V.B., Dagnan, S.N., et al. (2011) Profil épidémiologique des personnes exposées à la rage à Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. Santé publique, 23, 279-286. https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.114.0279</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiembré, I., Benie, J., Attoh-Touré, H., et al. (2013) Abandon de prophylaxie post-exposition au centre antirabique d’Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique, 106, 272-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-013-0312-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serradin, P., Akakpo, A.J. and Bornarel, P. (1989) Urbanisation et rage en zone tropicale. ORSTOM, Paris, 93-101. (Colloques et Séminaires)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sylla, K., Diop, S.A., Sow, M.S., et al. (2019) Exposition à un risque d’infection rabique à l’unité de prévention du service de maladies infectieuses et tropicales du CHNU de Fann à Dakar: Caractéristiques et prise en charge thérapeutique. Revue Malienne d’Infectiologie et de Microbiologie, 13, 26-33. https://doi.org/10.53597/remim.v13i1.1303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youla, A.S., Traore, F.A., Sako, F.B., et al. (2014) La rage canine et humaine à Conakry: Aspects épidémiologique et prophylactique. Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique, 107, 18-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-013-0321-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121481-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savadogo, M., Koné, P., Dahourou, L.D., et al. (2020) Epidémie de la rage et connaissance, attitudes et pratiques des communautés au Burkina faso. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 73, 133-140. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.31863</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>