<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJSST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5999</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojsst.2022.124008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJSST-121381</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessment of Safety and Health Practices in Road Construction
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Prashant</surname><given-names>Baral</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Madhav</surname><given-names>Prasad Koirala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Engineering, Pokhara University, Pokhara, Nepal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The construction sector contributes significantly to a country’s socioeconomic growth. It is significant because of the direct and indirect influence it has on all economic activity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and health performance of site workers on various road construction projects in Pokhara metropolitan city and to examine whether the performance indexes were close to the International Labor Organization’s code of practices. The information gathered from the respondents was examined using measure central tendency and prioritized by importance. The results of the questionnaire survey showed that Pokhara metropolitan city’s construction projects were not found to meet the ILO’s health and safety standards whereas few of the rules were effectively followed. Most employees have access to safe drinking and sanitary facilities, with some receiving extra perks. The survey found just seven distinct types of personal protective equipment (PPE), indicating that most workers overlook the use of PPE on the job. Consequently, in addition to quality and quantity, the monitoring office should put greater emphasis on construction site health and safety.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Safety</kwd><kwd> Health</kwd><kwd> Worker</kwd><kwd> PPE and Construction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Both in developed and developing countries, the construction industry has a significant impact on worker health and safety. Construction industry is very substantial economically and socially [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref1">1</xref>]. Although construction work shares the same high-risk nature all over the world, the fatalities in developing countries are almost three times as many fatalities as in developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref2">2</xref>]. The situation is even worse in underdeveloped nations like Nepal, where “safety and health programs” are still in the early phases of adoption and there is a lack of proper execution in order to achieve a safe working environment. Safety is a crucial factor in the construction industry, especially when it comes to worker health. There is no doubt that the construction sector is one of the most dangerous, and maintaining a safe working environment has been a constant issue. Many accidents occur in construction sites all over the world that result in huge loss of property and life as well, this loss is impossible to compensate.</p><p>The goal of construction safety is to avoid accidents and illnesses in the workplace. However, in poor countries such as Nepal, construction safety concerns are not given the importance they deserve, and as a result, safety practices and culture are not as well developed as they should be in construction projects.</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Statement of Problem</title><p>The Nepalese construction industry is still learning about safety. Every year, thousands of people die and many more are injured in the Nepalese construction industry, proving that measures to minimize accidents on construction sites are insufficient [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref3">3</xref>]. Landslides are one of the most common causes of accidents on road construction sites. Accidents in the workplace are also caused by a lack of a controlled working environment and an organization’s work culture. Accidents in Nepal’s construction sector are primarily caused by a lack of laws and regulations, construction company negligence, government negligence, unskilled labor, and profit motives of firms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>The road construction project in Nepal is carried out by different levels of government like Department of Road, Infrastructure Development, Metropolitan Offices and so on. These government offices are working on regular basis from tendering to the inspecting. In spite of inspection and regular control, there lacks the basis concept of safety during the construction phase. Basically, in local level projects like Metropolitan office, because of lack of experience and practice, safety concern is lagging behind quiet distinctly.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Research Objectives</title><p>The main objective of the study is to compare the safety and health as per an International Labor Organization (ILO) code of Practice in road construction project in Pokhara Metropolitan city.</p></sec><sec id="s1_3"><title>1.3. Significance of Study</title><p>This research will help to document the better safety practices approach, and then, it can be implemented or practiced in other road construction projects to improve the safety performance.</p></sec><sec id="s1_4"><title>1.4. Research Purpose</title><p>The purpose of this study is to explain, or compare with minimum compliance of safety and health in construction site at Pokhara metropolitan city or its outcome, which specifies the kind of study that will be carried out.</p></sec><sec id="s1_5"><title>1.5. Limitation of Study</title><p>Only the ILO’s code of conduct pertaining to road construction is alluded to in this study, which focuses on safety measures in limited road construction projects in the Pokhara Metropolitan City.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Literature Review</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Construction Safety Performance Scenario in Developing Countries Like Nepal</title><p>Construction in developing countries like Pakistan and India is more labor intensive than in industrialized countries, requiring about 2.5 to a stunning 10 times the number of workers per activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref4">4</xref>]. This means that the construction site is fairly busy, and with more people comes a higher risk of an accident. In the context of the Nepalese construction sector, the issue is identical.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Safety Management at Construction Sites</title><p>Considering recent efforts to improve construction site safety, the number of occupational injuries and fatalities in the construction industry continues to fluctuate. However, the implementation of H&amp;S in construction has not resulted in a commensurate improvement in the construction industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref5">5</xref>]. Safety management must be robust and applicable to all areas of the job, beginning with the estimating phase and continuing until the last worker has left the site at the project’s conclusion. Every conceivable partner to a construction project must be included in the safety program in some way so that everyone is held accountable.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Use of Personal Protective Equipment</title><p>Despite all of the measures taken during project planning and work design, most construction sites have working conditions that need the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref6">6</xref>]. Personal protection equipment (PPE) includes clothing, goggles, helmets, and other garments or equipment that is designed to protect the wearer’s body from injury (PPE). Chemicals, biohazards, and airborne particulate matter are all protected by personal protection equipment (PPE) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref7">7</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Occupational Safety, Health and Environment in Nepal</title><p>When it comes to the Nepali construction business, Khumraj (2015) discovered that workers outnumber machines, and that safety rules are lax. Laborers are at risk in workplaces with machines and equipment; electrical work; construction work; transportation work; chemical use; a dusty environment; a congested, dark, and poorly ventilated environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref8">8</xref>]. Accidents in Nepal are not properly reported. Reports of deaths and the media’s coverage of them are all that are reported in the concerned bodies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref9">9</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. ILO in Nepal</title><p>In the United Nations, the International Labor Organization (ILO) is the institution that deals with employment and workplace issues, along with the related rights. A member of the ILO since August 30, 1966, Nepal joined the ILO by applying just Article 3 Para 1 of the ILO’s Constitution. The ILO Country Office for Nepal was created in 1994. There are 11 ILO conventions that Nepal has ratified, including seven core conventions. As a result of the ILO’s efforts, the Government, Workers’ Organizations, and Employers’ Organizations in Nepal have developed a productive result and these three parties have been able to unionize informal workers, implement various social protection measures, revise labor laws and build social dialogue mechanisms as well as ratify ILO conventions because to this relationship [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.121381-ref10">10</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Material and Methodology</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Study Area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>)</title><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Selected construction sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S.N.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Road Construction Projects by PMC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Contractor Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Contract Amount</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Major Works</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upgrading of Baglung Buspark Kaskikot Road, PMC-18&amp;24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mahadev/Khimti J.V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102310657.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Earthworks, Structures, Premix</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upgrading of RTO Road, PMC-17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ashish/Fewa J.V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82563897.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drain, Asphalt Concrete</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upgrading of Ward office Thuldhunga Surtane Chainpur Suraudi Sadak, PMC-21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gajindra/Shree Geeta/Simran J.V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111135173.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Earthworks, Structures, Premix</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Method of Data Collection</title><p>Primary data was obtained in the field utilizing a variety of approaches such as field observation and a check list survey. Secondary data was gathered from books, journals, articles, papers, and theses on safety.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Data Used</title><p>We will use the data acquired from primary data and secondary data, observation and expert views.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussions</title><p>Relative view of respondents (Workers and Supervisors) in terms of their satisfaction level with safety practices and principles adopted in their construction site as per International Labor Organization (ILO) code of practices.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Safety at Workplace</title><p>The mean of safety at workplace in construction is 2.78 in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, indicating that respondents are dissatisfied with safety measures in their real field of activity.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Scaffold and Ladders</title><p>According to the mean score in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the total score is 2.73, indicating that respondents are dissatisfied with the ILO’s real site operations and conduct.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Transport, Earth-Moving and Materials-Handling Equipment</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows that the totals mean score for transportation, earth-moving, and materials-handling equipment is 3.21. In compared to the ILO code of conduct, respondents are quite happy with the general performance of transportation, earth movement, and materials handling equipment.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Health Hazards, First Aid and Occupational Health Services</title><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, respondents are dissatisfied with health hazards, first aid, and occupational health services, as seen by the mean score of 2.42, which is considerably below 3.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Respondents view on safety at workplace</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housekeeping</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Precautions against the fall of materials and persons, &amp; collapse of structures</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prevention of unauthorized entry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fire prevention and fire fighting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lighting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Safety at Workplace</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Respondents view on scaffold ladders</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Materials used</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Design and construction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.968</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inspection and maintenance of scaffolds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lifting appliances on scaffolds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.964</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Use of scaffolds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.968</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scaffolds and ladders</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Respondent view on transport, earth-moving and materials handling equipment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Power shovels, excavators</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulldozers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scarpers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asphalt Layers and Finishers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pavers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.982</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Road Rollers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transport, earth-moving and materials-handling equipment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.787</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Respondents view on health hazards, first aid and occupational health service</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Dev</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Access to Occupational health and safety</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Availability and use of First aid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Information and protection against Hazardous substances</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Measures in working on Dangerous Atmosphere</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prevention against Heat Stress, cold and wet conditions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.974</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Noise and Vibration controls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health hazards, first aid and occupational health services</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.787</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. General Welfare of Workers</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> depicts the availability of several general welfare services in respondents’ preferred locations. According to the poll, most respondents had access to a drinking facility, with 87.4% favoring the provision of such a facility. On all three road construction projects that were seen, the availability of various worker welfare services is depicted.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Planning (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>)</title><p>The total mean score is 3.70, which is higher than 3 and indicates planning is critical to enhancing construction site safety (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_7"><title>4.7. Training and Awareness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>)</title><p>According to respondents, training and awareness play a critical role in improving safety on construction sites, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, with a mean score of 3.62.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Respondents view on impact of planning part</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Dev</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Include safety part in Planning</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Allocation of budget for safety</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.978</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Access of safety in Conditions of Contract</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Provision of Safety Booklets</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Planning Part</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.812</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Respondents view on impact of training and awareness</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mi n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ma x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mea n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ran k</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Regular training and awareness related to safety and health</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Regular tool Box talks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Budget allocation for training</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Involvement of Workers in safety briefing and classes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.092</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Training and Awareness Part</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.917</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p></sec><sec id="s4_8"><title>4.8. Health and First Aid (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>)</title><p>The influence of health and first aid on the effective execution of safety on the building site is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. The total mean score is 3.62, which is higher than 3 and indicates that health and first aid are critical to enhancing construction site safety.</p></sec><sec id="s4_9"><title>4.9. Labor Welfare and Motivation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>)</title><p>With an aggregate mean of 3.71, the influence of improvement on several areas of labor welfare and motivation was determined to be rather outstanding (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Summaries of the Research</title><p>Safety at work place is worst, provided scaffolders and ladders are not satisfactory, the handling of earth moving, transportation and other heavy equipment also not good, General welfare of workers is not good even 87.4% workers are getting drinking water, Training, motivation, awareness program were not conducted. From the literature review too, we are lagging the ILO, Safety compliance. Nepal has already rectified ILO convention.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Respondents view on impact of health aid</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Dev</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Availability of first aid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First aid training to workers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency vehicle on site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Availability of Paramedical on site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health and First Aid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.903</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Respondents view on impact of labor welfare and motivation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Dev</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Provision of Safety awards and incentives</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Access of PPE to all workers at site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.085</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No work in difficult weather condition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Provision of better drinking water and sanitation facility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Labor Welfare Motivation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: (Survey 2022).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions and Recommendations</title><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. Conclusion</title><p>Based on the results of the questionnaire survey and observations, it is obvious that the practice of safety in Pokhara Metropolitan City Road construction projects does not correspond to the code of practice recommended by the International Labor Organization. On a road construction site, workers and supervisors are easily accessible human resources, but they are also more vulnerable to health concerns.</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Recommendation</title><p>In order to improve the operation of occupational health and safety management systems in the construction sector it is suggested that:</p><p>&#183; Pokhara Metropolitan City Office, in collaboration with the respective contractor, should prioritize safety and health in construction, accelerating efforts to bring actual practice related to road construction closer to the ILO code of conduct.</p><p>&#183; The road construction projects should be well analyzed in terms of safety before commencement of project and details of safety should be included in planning part of project.</p><p>&#183; Pokhara Metropolitan city office road section should order its entire branch to establish safety and health department to organize safety and health training and consultation for employees.</p><p>&#183; The monitoring office should establish safety and health program at all of its branches.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Baral, P. and Koirala, M.P. (2022) Assessment of Safety and Health Practices in Road Construction. Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 12, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2022.124008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.121381-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saravanan</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Improving Safety Performance in Construction Industry</article-title><source> Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> E160</fpage>-<lpage>E162</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">King, R.W. and Hudson, R. (1985) Construction Hazard and Safety Handbook. Butterworths (Canada) Limited.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, A. (2019) A Thesis on Safety Issues in Nepalese Construction Industry. Deakin University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farooqui, R.U., Arif, F. and Rafeeqi, S.F.A. (2008) Safety Performance in Construction Industry of Pakistan. In First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries, Karachi, Vol. 2, 74-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chiocha, C., Smallwood, J. and Emuze, F. (2011) Health and Safety in the Malawian Construction Industry. Acta Structilia, 18, 68-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ILO (1995) Safety, Health and Welfare on Construction Sites: A Training Manual. International Labour Office, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, S.A., Wazed, A., Khan, M.H., Faruquee, M.H., Yasmin, R., Rahman, M.S. and Khandkar, S. (2013) Training Manual on Occupational Safety and Health. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, National Institute of Preventive &amp; Social Medicine (NIPSOM) and Bangaldesh University of Health Scinces (BUHS), Dhaka.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Upadhyaya, U. (2005) Occupational Health, Safety and Environment in the Construction Sector. Issue of the World of Work in Nepal.  
https://www.gefont.org/assets/upload/pressarticles/Occupational_Health,_Safety_and_Environment_in_the_Construction_Sector_(by_Umesh_Upadhyaya).pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joshi, S., Shrestha, S. and Vaidya, S. (2011) Occupational Safety and Health Studies in Nepal. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 1, 19-26.  
https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v1i1.4725</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.121381-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ILO Nepal (2020) ILO Nepal.  
https://www.ilo.org/kathmandu/areasofwork/safety-and-health-at-work/lang--en/index.htm</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>