<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2022.1211094</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-120990</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Placenta Previa at Souro Sanou Teaching Hospital, Burkina Faso (About 142 Cases)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yaméogo</surname><given-names>Rélwendé Barnabé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Millogo</surname><given-names>Jean de la Croix</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bassinga</surname><given-names>Kévin Wendpouyri Jonathan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kaboré</surname><given-names>Ahmed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Somé</surname><given-names>Der Adolphe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Public Health Department of Joseph Ki-Zerbo University, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Obstetrics-Gynecology and Reproductive Medecine Department of Sour&amp;amp;ocirc; Sanou Teaching Hospital, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1113</fpage><lpage>1120</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>7,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: 
  Placenta previa is an obstetric emergency that can be
   life-threatening for both mother and foetus. Despite the progress made in diagnosis and treatment, it continues to be feared by obstetricians because of high maternal and perinatal mortality and increased morbidity. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic aspects of placenta previa at the Sour&#244; Sanou University Hospital in Bobo-Dioulasso. <b>Method:</b> This was
   
  a descriptive cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection from
   January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Included were 142 pregnant women admitted to the maternity ward of the Sour&#244; Sanou University Hospital (CHUSS) and diagnosed with placenta previa during pregnancy, labor, or in the postpartum period. <b>Result:</b> The frequency of placenta previa was 0.89%; the average age of patients was 28.51 years with extremes of 16 and 44 years. The multigestations represented 28.17% and the pauciparous 31.69%. Patients with a uterine scar represented 15.49%. Ultrasound diagnosis was made in 38 patients (26.76%). Placenta previa was recovered in 56.34% of cases. Patients with severe anaemia were 28.87%, and 57.04% of the anaemic cases received blood transfusion. Caesarean section was performed in 93.66% of patients. Four maternal deaths (2.81%) and 30 stillbirths (27.02%) were reported.<b> Conclusion:</b> Placenta previa remains a fairly frequent pathology with a non-negligible lethality rate and perinatal mortality in the maternity ward of the Sour&#244; Sanou University Hospital.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Placenta Previa</kwd><kwd> Prognosis</kwd><kwd> Bobo-Dioulasso</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Placenta previa is an obstetrical emergency that affects the maternal and foetal prognosis because of the dreaded hemorrhage that it causes. It is the 4th cause of maternal mortality during hemorrhage of the 3rd trimester and labor after uterine rupture, hemorrhage of delivery and retroplacental hematoma with rates ranging from 0.5% to 2.17% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref1">1</xref>]. Despite the systematic use of ultrasound, which allows not only the diagnosis of placental insertion during pregnancy but also the modification of the therapeutic attitude, it remains a high-risk and very unpredictable pregnancy complication. Its frequency in Africa remains high; Buambo-Bamanga in Congo-Brazzaville [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref2">2</xref>] reported a frequency of 0.6%. In Burkina Faso, this pathology is most often diagnosed only during labor, after a hemorrhagic accident [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>In the maternity ward of the Sour&#244; Sanou University Hospital (CHUSS), Traor&#233; in 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref1">1</xref>] reported a placenta previa frequency of 2.17% and a stillbirth rate of 12.70%. It seemed important to us in view of this finding to update the data on this pathology in order to contribute to the reduction of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection in the Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine of the Sour&#244; Sanou University Hospital of Bobo from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Pregnant women admitted to the obstetrics department and carrying a pregnancy at the end of 28 weeks of amenorrhea or more were included in the study. The sampling was exhaustive and the final sample consisted of 142 cases. The variables collected were sociodemographic data (age, main occupation, place of residence, socio-economic level, marital status), gynecological and obstetrical history (number of gestations, parity, number of abortions, number of caesarean sections), clinical (general condition, reason for admission) paraclinical (haemoglobin level, ultrasound result) and therapeutic data (mode of delivery, notion of transfusion). Data were collected from clinical records, delivery room and operating room registers. Placenta previa is defined as the insertion of part or all of the placenta on the lower segment.</p><p>The data collected was entered using a microcomputer and analyzed with Epi info software version 7.2.1.0. Word processing was done using Microsoft office 2016 and tables were done using Microsoft Excel.</p><p>Given the retrospective nature of the study, only medical records and registers were handled. All information was collected with respect to patient confidentiality. Data analysis was done without patient identities but rather with chart numbers.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Frequency</title><p>In one year, we recorded 142 cases of placenta previa out of a total of 15,888 deliveries, i.e. a frequency of 0.89%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Sociodemographic Characteristics</title><p>The average age of the patients was 28.51 years with extremes of 16 and 44 years, the age group 25 to 29 years represented 27.46% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Clinical Data</title><p>The metrorrhagia of the third trimester of pregnancy represented 57.74% of the reasons for admission (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The general condition of the patients was good, fair and poor in 24.65%, 71.83% and 3.52% respectively. Concerning obstetrical history, the average parity was 2.60 with extremes of 1 and 9, pauciparous patients represented 36.62%, those who had at least one abortion were 23.94%, patients with at least one uterine scar represented 15.5% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). On admission, 104 patients were in labor, of whom 56.34% had a covering placenta previa and 16.90% had a non-covering placenta previa.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Para-Clinical Data</title><p>The blood count was performed in all patients and showed severe anaemia in 41</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to socio-demographic data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Socio-demographic data</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Singles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concubinage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Main occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shopkeepers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rural area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban environment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by reason for admission</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reason for admission</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metrorrhagia of the third trimester of pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated abdominal and pelvic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metrorrhagia associated withabdomino-pelvic pain in pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placenta praevia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Premature rupture of the membranes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threat of premature delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.34</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to obstetrical history</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetrical history</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gestity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primigest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paucigest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multigest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grand multigest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >number of abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grand multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of previous caesarean sections</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>patients (28.87%), moderate anaemia in 41 patients (28.87%) and mild anaemia in 38 patients (26.76%). Obstetrical ultrasound was performedin 38 patients (26.76%) and revealed a central placenta previa in 17 patients (11.97%), marginal in 13 cases (9.15%) and lateral in 8 cases (5.63%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Therapeutic Aspects</title><p>Blood transfusion was performed in 81 patients (57.04%). The blood products transfused were red blood cells, iso group and iso rhesus. The delivery route was caesarean section for 133 patients (93.66%) and vaginal delivery for 9 women (6.34%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Maternal Prognosis</title><p>In 125 cases (88.02%) we recorded complications. There were five (05) cases of postoperative infectious complications (3.52%) including 3 cases (2.11%) of parietal suppurations and 2 cases (1.41%) of endometritis, and 120 cases of anaemia, i.e. 84.50%. We noted 4 maternal deaths, i.e. a case fatality rate of 2.81%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Foetal Prognosis</title><p>With regard to foetal prognosis, out of a total of 148 births, we recorded 108 live births (72.97%), with 21.62% very premature; 29.73% moderately premature and 48.65% full term. We recorded 30 stillbirths and 4 newborns who died before 7 days of life, i.e. a perinatal mortality rate of 23.94%.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Frequency of Placenta Previa</title><p>Placenta previa remains a formidable obstetric pathology. Its actual frequency is poorly defined in the literature and is approximately 1/200 pregnancies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref4">4</xref>]. This frequency depends on the clinical criteria used, the methods of diagnosis, the time of diagnosis (during pregnancy, during labor or after delivery) and the anatomical varieties selected. In our study we found a frequency of 0.89% higher than those of Ciemensti [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref5">5</xref>], Sheiner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref6">6</xref>], and Ghazli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref7">7</xref>] who reported rates of 0.2%, 0.38%, and 0.4% respectively. The referral nature of our service, which allows it to receive serious or complicated cases from peripheral maternity hospitals, partly explains our results.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Sociodemographic Characteristics</title><p>Advanced maternal age is a factor favouring the occurrence of placenta previa. Foote [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref8">8</xref>] reported that the risk of placenta previa is multiplied by 2 beyond 29 years of age and by 3 beyond 35 years of age according to Nelson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref8">8</xref>]; this was the case in our series where we found 42.96% of the patients who were 30 years of age or older.</p><p>Housewives represented 57.04% in our study. The probable financial dependence of these women, often associated with the lack of income-generating activity, could make access to obstetrical ultrasound difficult, which allows for early diagnosis of this pathology, which could explain the low rate of ultrasound diagnosis of placenta previa in our study (29.76%).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Clinical Aspects</title><p>The typical profile of the placenta previa candidate is that of a multigester and multiparous woman with a history of abortions and uterine scarring, and with several miscarriages due to preferential implantation of the egg on the damaged endometrium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref9">9</xref>]. In our study, multigestation women represented 50.70%, multiparous women 42.25%, those with at least one previous abortion 23.94% and those with at least one uterine scar 15.40%. Placenta previa (PP) is the main cause of metrorrhagia in the third trimester of pregnancy and this metrorrhagia may worsen during labor due to uterine contractions. In our series, metrorrhagia represented 77.46% of the reasons for admission; this rate could be explained by the high number of patients in labor at admission (73.23%).</p><p>Anaemia was severe in 28.87% of patients, moderate in 28.87% and 26.76% of patients had mild anaemia. All these cases of anaemia could be due to bleeding related to the placenta previa; this bleeding, even if minimal, can aggravate anaemia already existing during the pregnancy, explaining the cases of severe anaemia.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Therapeutic Aspects</title><p>Anaemia remains a major public health problem in Burkina because of peripartum hemorrhages that very often occur in women who are already anaemic. Blood transfusion in our context is generally done according to blood loss and the clinical condition of the patient. In our study, blood transfusion was given to 81 patients (57.45%).</p><p>The caesarean section rate was 93.66% in our study. It varies from 28.83% to 87% in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref11">11</xref>]. Our rate reflects the attitude to reduce the risk of neonatal death in the peri-natal period, because caesarean section saves 2 to 7 times more foetuses than vaginal delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref12">12</xref>]. For Bhide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref13">13</xref>], caesarean section should be systematic in cases of haemorrhagic PP.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Maternal Prognosis</title><p>Maternal morbidity was marked by severe anaemia and parietal suppurations which represented 28.87% and 3.52% respectively. Several authors agree that morbidity is important in PP and even more so after caesarean section [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref12">12</xref>]. Buambo Bamanga noted a maternal anaemia rate of 8.6% and parietal suppurations of 5.5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref1">1</xref>]. This high rate of anaemia in our study can be explained by the early onset of the first hemorrhages, the recurrence of hemorrhages, and the importance of the quantity of blood lost prepartum in patients who were already anaemic. This anaemia, which is often poorly corrected either by insufficient transfusion or by a lack of blood in our blood banks, predisposes to infectious complications.</p><p>In our study, 4 cases of death were recorded, representing a case fatality rate of 2.81%. This rate is higher than those found by Douysset [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref10">10</xref>] and Ley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref11">11</xref>] in France as well as Ibtissam in Algeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref14">14</xref>] who had not recorded any deaths. This difference can be explained by the fact that developed countries have increasingly sophisticated means of survival.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Foetal Prognosis</title><p>Prematurity, due to its numerous complications, is the main cause of perinatal mortality associated with placenta previa, but also foetal deaths in utero secondary to hemorrhagic shock [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref15">15</xref>]. In our series, perinatal mortality was 23.94%, which is higher than that reported by Traor&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120990-ref3">3</xref>], which was 12.70%. This high rate in our study could be due to the proportions of very premature births (21.62%) and still births (21.12%) recorded.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limitations</title><p>Due to the retrospective nature of the study, a certain number of variables could not be mentioned, notably the insufficiency or absence of medical information in some cases due to poor record keeping and the lack of ultrasound data in some cases.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Placenta previa remains a fairly frequent pathology with a non-negligible case fatality and stillbirth rate in the maternity ward of the Sour&#244; Sanou University Hospital. Early ultrasound diagnosis allows for appropriate monitoring and prevention of all obstetrical complications of this pathology.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Barnab&#233;, Y.R., de la Croix, M.J., Jonathan, B.K.W., Ahmed, K. and Der Adolphe, S. (2022) Placenta Previa at Souro Sanou Teaching Hospital, Burkina Faso (About 142 Cases). Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12, *-*. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2022.1211094</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.120990-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Traore</surname><given-names> I.Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Placenta pr&amp;aelig;via à la maternité du centre hospitalier universitaire Sour&amp;ocirc; Sanou de Bobo-Dioulasso au Burkina Faso: Aspect épidémiologiques, cliniques, thérapeutiques et le pronostic</article-title><source> Université Ouaga 1 Pr Joseph Ki Zerbo</source><volume> 113</volume>,<fpage> 10</fpage>-<lpage>55</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buambo-Bamanga, S.F., Oyere-Moke, P., Makoumbou, P., Ekoundzola, J.R. and Mayanda, H.F. (2004) Placenta Praevia: Maternal and Fetal Prognosis Covering 128 Consecutive Cases from the Brazzaville University Hospital Center. Santé, 14, 177-181.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onadja, K.A. (2003) Aspects épidémiologiques, cliniques et thérapeutiques du placenta pr&amp;aelig;via au cours du travail à la maternité du Centre Hospitalier National Yalgado Ouédraogo de Ouagadougou. Thèse Med n°30, Université de Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, 104, 1-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mabie, W.C. (1992) Placenta Praevia. Clinics in Perinatology, 19, 425-445.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-5108(18)30465-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ciemensti, A. and Dluglecki, F. (2005) Relationships between Placenta Praevia and Maternel Age, Parity and Prior Caesarean Deliveries. Ginekologia Polska, 76, 248-249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sheiner, E., Shoham-Vardi, Hallak, M., Katz, M., Hershkowitz, R. and Mazor, M. (2001) Placenta Praevia: Obstetric Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcome. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 1, 414-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.10.6.414.419</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghazli, M., Zinoun, M., salah-Eddine, A., Aderdour, M. and Bekkay, M. (2000) Placenta praevia et prognostic foetal à propos de 200 cas. Revue Franaise de Gynécologie et d’obstétrique, 93, 457-463.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Foote, W.R. and Fraser, W.D. (1960) Placenta Previa of Eight Years Management. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 80, 10-16.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)36408-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cotton, D.B., Read, J.A., Paul, R.H. and Quilligan, E.J. (1980) The Conservative Aggressive Management of Placenta Previa. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 137, 687-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33242-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douysset, X. (2012) Facteurs de risque d’hémorragie sévère en cas de césarienne pour placenta pr&amp;aelig;via. Faculté mixte de médecine. Thèse Med, Faculté de médecine de Rouen, Rouen, 66, 6-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ley</surname><given-names> D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Prise en charge du placenta pr&amp;aelig;via hémorragique: Evaluation des pratiques professionnelles à la maternité de Port Royal</article-title><source> Université Paris Descartes</source><volume> 80</volume>,<fpage> 5</fpage>-<lpage>38</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boogs, G. (1996) Placenta praevia. EMC (Elsevier Parsi) Obstétrique 5-0690A-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhide, A. and Thilaganathan, B. (2004) Recent Advances in the Management of Placenta Praevia. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16, 447-451.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001703-200412000-00002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibtissam, S. (2016) Placenta pr&amp;aelig;via: état des lieux dans le service de gynécologie obstétrique du CHU de Bejaia (Algérie). Thèse Med, Université Abderrahmane Mira Bejaia, Bejaia, 114, 58-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120990-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salihu, H.M., Li, Q., Rouse, D.J. and Alexander, G.R. (2003) Placenta Previa: Neonatal Death after Live Births in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 188, 1305-1309. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.303</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>