<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7597</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2022.124049</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS-120689</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Colostrum Supplementation as an Aid for Improving Health and Growth Performance of Preweaned Holstein Dairy Calves
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gavan</surname><given-names>Constantin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Riza</surname><given-names>Mihaela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Research Department, Agriculture Research and Development Station &amp;amp;#536imnic, Craiova, Romania</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>712</fpage><lpage>720</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The adjective of this study was to determine the effect of partial replacement of whole milk with second
  -
   and third
  -
  milking colostrum 
  o
  n the health status and growth performance of preweaned Holstein dairy calves. A minimum of 110
   
  calves
   of
   2
   
  -
   
  3 days old Holstein Friesian calves were enrolled and randomly allocated to 
  two treatment groups 1) CS—colostrum supplement group and 2) UC—unsupplemented control group. The CS group of calves received pooled second and third milking colostrum with Brix reading between 19 and 24% (mean 21.8% &#177; 1.75%) as colostrum supplement (one liter mixed with 3 L of whole milk), and UC group of calves received 4 L of whole milk in each of the 2 daily meals for 14 days. Serum IgG levels were determined to evaluate passive transfer of immunity. Milk and grain consumption was recorded for 28 days by research personnel. All calves were weighted at entry of the trial, at 28 days and at weaning (65 days). Calves receiving supplemental colostrum had less diarrhea and respiratory disease than control calves. Also
  ,
   the results indicated that health problems were associated with low serum IgG levels and low
  -
  weight calves. Grain consumption 
  and average
   daily gain (ADG) over 28 days of life were greater in CS group of calves compared with UC group of calves. Colostrum supplementation during 
  the 
  first 14 days of life in calves was effective in reading diarrheal and bovine respiratory diseases and in the use of antimicrobials. Further studies are needed to identify the molecular mechanisms involved in beneficial effects of colostrum supplementation on calf growth and heal
  th
  .
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Colostrum</kwd><kwd> Dairy Calf</kwd><kwd> Diarrhea</kwd><kwd> Bovine Respiratory Disease</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Bovine colostrum contains nutrients, and several bioactive compounds including immunoglobulins, bioactive peptides, lactoferrin, oligosaccharides, hormones growth factors, and immune related microRNA which play critical roles in the health and development of the calf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref3">3</xref>]. Early feeding of colostrum is essential because of the progressive decline in the uptake of immunoglobulin (large molecule of IgG, IgA and IgM), during the first days of life due to gut closure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>There are concerns that prophylactic uses of antimicrobial drugs in food animal production increase antimicrobial, resistance with potential adverse effects on human health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Dairy animal industries are being encouraged to reduce the use of all types of antimicrobial drugs, to find new alternatives for therapeutic needs, and to optimize animal health through management approaches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>One area of focus in dairy farms is calves being reared as dairy heifers’ replacements or as calves for beef. Successfully rearing these animals is to ensure adequate intake of colostrum. At birth, calves have an immature immune system, and need a passive transfer of immunity from their dams through colostrum until their own active immune system develops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref8">8</xref>]. Passive immunity must be acquired by calves through the ingestion and absorption of antibodies (predominantly IgG) found in colostrum. Successfully acquiring passive immunity is influenced by a number of factors, which include the IgG content of colostrum, timing of feeding as well as the volume provided [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Extended feeding of colostrum during the first 2 weeks of life can be beneficial to dairy calves. Chamarro et al. (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref10">10</xref>] reported that feeding milk replacer enriched with 150 g of colostrum powder during the first 2 weeks of life did not increase body weight or average daily gain, but reduced the occurrence of abnormal feces, abnormal respiration and antibiotic treatment before weaning period. Jones et al. (2004) reported higher feed efficiency and a tendency to gain more BW in calves receiving IgG via maternal colostrum compared with calves that received the same amount via colostrum substitute in the first week of life. Similar to colostrum, transition milk contains an abundance of bioactive compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref12">12</xref>]. The transition milk may be an alternative to colostrum for feeding calves when extra colostrum is unavailable.</p><p>There is evidence that antibodies remaining in the gut lumen also provide local immunity and may enhance intestinal villus development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref14">14</xref>]. We hypothesized that extended colostrum feeding is beneficial to calves in the preweaning period.</p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of colostrum supplementation as an aid for improving health status, and growth performance in the preweaning period of Holstein dairy calves.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Herd</title><p>This study was done in the research dairy farm of Agricultural research and Development Station (ARDS) Simnic, Craiova, Romania. The experiments were performed in compliance with European Union Directive 86/609/Ec on Holstein Friesian dairy calves. The research dairy farm has a 140-cow milking herd. Experiments were conducted from January 2019 to December 2020. Calves were individually housed in clean, sanitized wooden hutches, arranged in rows of 12 hutches.</p><p>All cows were milked twice a day.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Colostrum Collection and Handling</title><p>Fresh cows were moved to milking area within 2 hours of calving. Cow preparation was identical to routine parlor practices. Milking equipment was sanitized between cows and milking. All milked colostrum was put into an ice bath after dumping from collection pail. Fresh maternal colostrum is fed within one-half hour after it is harvested. Fresh maternal first-milking colostrum with Brix reading 25% or higher is fed on its own, and with Brix reading between 18% - 24% is supplemented with colostrum powder.</p><p>In this form, first-milking colostrum is used to make the high-quality colostrum and second- and third-milking colostrum from older cows was used as colostrum supplement in this study. The second- and third-milking colostrum was refrigerated in clean sanitized self-sealing plastic bags. We fill a 3 L size bags with just one liter (L) of colostrum. Then, when these are frozen laid flat in the freezer, they are thin and throw quickly.</p><p>Please do not revise any of the current designations.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Design and a Farm Procedure</title><p>Sample size for a significant difference among the two groups of calves estimated for multiple comparisons at a power of 95% and alpha of 0.5 and a minimal detectable difference, resulted in a simple size of 50 calves per group. Adding an additional 10% to account for attrition, the total sample size of 55 calves per group was estimated. A minimum of 110 calves of 2 - 3 days old Holstein Friesian calves were enrolled and randomly allocated to two treatment groups: 1) colostrum supplement (CS group 1) and 2) unsupplemented control (UC group 2). The CS group received pooled second- and third-milking colostrum with Brix reading between 19% and 24% (mean 21.8% &#177; 1.75%) as colostrum supplement (one liter mixed with 3 L of whole milk) and UC group received 4 L of whole milk, (no addition of colostrum supplement) in each of the 2 daily meals for 14 days. Research personnel were in charge of all feedings.</p><p>Calves were each evaluated daily by research personnel blinded to calf treatment group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref7">7</xref>]. Calves were evaluated for morbidity, which included fecal consistency hydration and respiratory scores using WI bovine respiratory disease clinical scoring system, summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>A member of the research team entering the hutch to measure the calf’s body temperature and manipulate the calf’s larynx to determine if a cough can be</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of the scoring system for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) designed at the University of Wisconsin. Clinical signs scored “0” are considered to be clinically normal</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Signs</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Score*:</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cough</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single induce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiple induced. Few occasional spontaneous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiple spontaneous</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nasal discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small amount of unilateral cloudy discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral cloudy or excessive, mucus discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copious bilateral mucopurulent discharge</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ocular discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small amount of ocular discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate amount of bilateral discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy ocular discharge</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ear and heat carriage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal carriage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ear flick or head shake</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slight unilateral droop</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Head tilt or bilateral droop</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rectal temperature ˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.3 - 38.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.9 - 39.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥39.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Add scores for all clinical signs, if total score is ≥ 5 calf maybe positive for BRD.</p><p>induce. Calves suspected to have BRD (score ≥ 5) were classified as clinically positive for BRD.</p><p>Diarrheal disease was defined as watery and/or bloody feces. All treatments in the first 28 days were performed and recorded by research personnel, based on farm treatment protocols.</p><p>All calves we weighted on a mechanical scale at entry into the trial, at entry into the trial, at 28 days, and at wearing (65 days). Also, blood samples from all calves were collected at entry into the trial to evaluate passive transfer of immunity status. Serum Ig G levels were determined using a commercial radial immune diffusion assay (Immuno-check).</p><p>Milk and grain consumption was recorded for 28 day by research personnel. After 28 days management of the calves was taken over by dairy farm personnel. Research personnel returned to measure wearing weight.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>Health and treatment data were recorded in a spreadsheet Excel program and analyzed using statistical software program. Ninety percent confidence intervals were calculate for main effects estimates. Interactions between main effects were also tested.</p><p>Passive transfer of immunity</p><p>Passive transfer of immunity status was classified as partial failure of passive transfer (PFPT) for values of IgG from 351 to 999 mg/dl, and adequate passive transfer (APT) for IgG ≥ 1000 mg/dl [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Initial weight</p><p>Calf weights taken when the calves enter in the trial were classified as law for weights ≤ 37.5 kg, mid for weights between 37.6 and 43.9 kg and high weight s ≥ 44 kg.</p><p>Mortality</p><p>Mortality in calves during the first 28 days was evaluated using univariate Kaplan-Meyer survival plots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Hazard rate ratio and 90% confidence intervals for the main effect (treatment group) and covariate (weight category and serum IgG category), were determined.</p><p>Morbidity</p><p>The percentage of days that the calves had diarrhea and were treated for diarrhea was calculated. Treatment group was the main effect evaluated, confounding variables included: calf initial weight category and calf IgG category. The days to first antimicrobial treatment for diarrhea conditional on treatment group, including the same confounding variable, was evaluated. Also, difference in respiratory morbidity between treatment groups was assessed for trend.</p><p>Average daily gain (ADG) and Grain intake</p><p>The least squares means were calculated and used to compare treatment differences in ADG up to 28 days of age and at weaning (65 days). Grain consumption was measured daily for 28 days and the average daily intake was calculated. The same main effect and covariate set were used to evaluate ADG and grain intake.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>This trial included 110 calves (55 in CS group and 55 in UC group).</p><p>Passive transfer of immunity status in the study calves was 15.45% (n = 17) and 84.55% (n = 93) in IgG categories PFPT and APT respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Initial weight categories were 25.45%, 45.45% and 29.10% for low, mid and high respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Mortality</p><p>Mortality rate over the first 28 days of the trial were 5.45% and 7.24% in CS and UC groups (no significant influence of colostrum supplement on mortality).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive statistics of serum IgG category and initial weights in the two groups evaluating the efficacy of feeding maternal colostrum supplement in whole milk for 14 days to preweaned calves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatment group<sup>1 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Serum IgG mg/dl</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >IgG category<sup>2</sup>, n (n dead)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Initial weight, kg</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Weight category<sup>3</sup>, n</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >APT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PFPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >UC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110 (7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93 (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>CS = Colostrum supplement, UC = unsupplement control; <sup>2</sup>APT = adequate passive transfer: IgG ≥ 1000 mg/dl, PFTP = partial failure of passive transfer. IgG between 555 and 999 mg/dl; <sup>3</sup>Low ≤ 37.5 kg; mid between 37.6 and 43.9 kg; high ≥ 44 kg.</p><p>Mortality percent in PFPT IgG category was 29.4%, compared with 2.1% in APT IgG category. Overall mortality percent was 6.36%. The hazard of dying calves with PFPT IgG category was 14 times greater than in calves with APT IgG category (data not shown).</p><p>Morbidity</p><p>Over the 28 days period, the overall percentage of days that diarrhea was observed was 10.9%. The colostrum supplemented group having the low percentage of diarrhea days (8.1% versus 13.7% for UC group).</p><p>Percentage of diarrhea days (8.1% versus 13.7% for UC group).</p><p>Calves with PFPT had increased risk for diarrhea compared with calves with APT. Low- and mid-weight calves also tended to have greater risk for diarrhea than high weight calves. All calves were treated with antimicrobials for approximately 12% of the total study calf-days.</p><p>The risk for being treated antimicrobials was increased for low-weight calves (compared with high-weight calves). Also for calves with PFPT the risk for being treated with antimicrobials was increased (compared with APT calves). Bovine respiration disease was present in 1.24% of the observation calf-days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>ADG and grain intake</p><p>A greater ADG to 28 days of age was 0.250 g for CS group of calves compared with 0.230 g for UC group of calves (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive statics of total calf study calf days (total days), number (%) of days calves observed with diarrhea and respiratory disease, number (%) of days calves treated with antimicrobials (treatment days) by treatment group evaluating the efficacy of feeding a colostrum supplement in whole milk for 14 days to preweaned calves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatment group<sup>1 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Diarrhea</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Resp days n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatment days (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total study calf-days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Days, n (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1494</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122 (8.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (1.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137 (9.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >UC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202 (13.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224 (15.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2972</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >324 (10.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (1.24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361 (12.1)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>CS = colostrum supplement; UC = unsupplement control.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive statistics of ADG, and average grain and milk intake by treatment group evaluating the efficacy of feeding a colostrum supplement in whole milk for 14 days to preweaned calves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Treatment group<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >ADG kg</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Daily feed consumption at 28 days of age</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Day 28</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Day 65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >UC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.460</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>CS = colostrum supplement; UC = unsupplement control.</p><p>The average daily grain intake for the first 28 days was greater in CS group of calves (0.211 kg versus 0.200 kg), compared with UC group of calves. Low- weight calves had grater ADG compared with high-weight calves (results not shown). Calves with PFPT had lower ADG compared with APT calves. At weaning (65 days) the factors affecting ADG were IgG status.</p><p>&#183; Passive transfer of Immunity</p><p>The majority of calves in this study had APT (84.5%). PFPT was an important predictor of mortality and morbidity. Improved nutrient intake has been associated with improved immune function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref16">16</xref>]. Berger et al. (2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref7">7</xref>] reported similar results to the current study.</p><p>&#183; Morbidity</p><p>Colostrum supplement added to whole milk for the first 14 days of life reduced the number of days the calves had diarrhea and decrease the use of antimicrobial treatment. This effect was due to the presence of colostrum immunoglobulins. Extended colostrum feeding reduces the susceptibility to diarrhea and bovine respiratory disease, stimulating morphological growth and functional maturation of the gastrointestinal tract [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref17">17</xref>] and promotes the establishment of beneficial bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>&#183; Mortality</p><p>There was no difference in mortality between the treatment groups. The most important factor associate with mortality was PFPT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>&#183; ADG and Grain consumption</p><p>The early ADG (by 28 days) difference for CS calves may be due to additional nutrients from colostrum supplement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref21">21</xref>] and the observed increased grain consumption in this group. Disease causing inflammation resulting in the release of cytokines can activate homeorhetic responses to direct nutrients from tissue deposition toward immunologic defense function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120689-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>In low-weight calves, ADG was greater because these calves received more milk per kilogram of body weight (BW) than heavier calves.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Colostrum supplementation during 14 days of life in calves was effective in reducing diarrheal disease and bovine respiratory disease and the use of antimicrobials.</p><p>The ADG up to 28 days of age in colostrums-supplemented calves was greater compared with that in control calves because of the combination of greater energy intake from liquid feed, increased grain intake and fewer days with diarrhea.</p><p>Further studies are needed to identify the molecular mechanisms involved in beneficial effects of colostrum supplementation on calf growth and health.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Constantin, G. and Mihaela, R. (2022) Colostrum Supplemen- tation as an Aid for Improving Health and Growth Performance of Preweaned Holstein Dairy Calves. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 12, 712-720. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2022.124049</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.120689-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bl&amp;#228ttler, U., Hammon, H.M., Morel, C., Philipona, C., Rauprich, A., Rom&amp;#233, V., Le Hu&amp;#235rou-Luron, I., Guilloteau, P. and Blum, J.W. (2001) Feeding Colostrum, Its Composition and Feeding Duration Variably Modify Proliferation and Morphology of the Intestine and Digestive Enzyme Activities of Neonatal Calves. Journal of Nutrition, 131, 1256-1263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.4.1256</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scheuer, B.H, Zbinden, Y., Schneiter, P., Tappy, L., Blum, J.W. and Hammon, H.M. (2006) Effects of Colostrum Feeding and Glucocorticoid Administration on Insulin Dependent Glucose Metabolism in Neonatal Calves. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 31, 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGrath, J.J. (2016) Accelerated Pre-Weaning Growth Rates in Dairy Calves: Do Antioxidants Have a Place? Animal Production Science, 56, 1275-1284. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15310</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arthington, J.D., Cattell, M.B., Quigley III, J.D., McCoy, G.C. and Hurley, W.L. (2000) Passive Immunoglobin Transfer in Newborn Calves Fed Colostrum or Spray-Dried Serum Protein Alone or as a Supplement to Colostrum of Varying Quality. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 2834-2838. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75183-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Animal Production and Health Division (2008) Joint FAO/WHO/01E Expert Meeting on Critically Important Antimicrobials. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://www.whoint/foodbovinedisease/resources/Report%20jout%20CIA%20Meeting.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silbergeld, E.K., Graham, J. and Price, L.B. (2008) Industrial Food Animal Production, Antimicrobial Resistance and Human Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berge, A.C.B., Besser, T.E., Moore, D.A. and Sischo, W.M. (2009) Evaluation of the Effect of Oral Colostrum Supplementation during the First Fourteen Days on the Health and Performance of Preweaned Claves. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 286-295. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1433</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davis C.L. and Drackley, J.K. (1998) The Development, Nutrition, and Management of the Young Calf (Book pp XIII + 339 pp). Iowa State University Press, Ames.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berry J. and Kennedy, E. (2019) Effect of Feeding Pooled High Quality Colostrum on the Health and Performance of Dairy Calves. Irish Dairying, 158-159. http://www.teagasc.ie/media/website/publications/2019/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chamarro, M.F., Cernicchiaro, N. and Haines, D.M. (2017) Evaluation of the Effects of Colostrum Replacer Supplementation of the Milk Replacer Ration on the Occurrence of Disease, Antibiotic Therapy, and Performance of Pre-Weaned Dairy Calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 1378-1387. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11652</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGrath, B.A., Fox, P.F., Mcsweeney, P.L.H. and Kelly, A.I. (2016) Composition and Properties of Bovine Colostrum. A Review. Dairy Science &amp; Technology, 96, 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-015-0258-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fischer, A.J., Malmuthuge, N., Guan, L.L. and Steele, M.A. (2018) Short Communication: The Effect of Heat Treatment of Bovine Colostrum on the Concentration of Oligosaccharides in Colostrum and in the Intestine of Neonatal Male Holstein Calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 401-407. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13533</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saif L.J. and Bohl, E.H. (1983) Passive Immunity to Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus: Intramammary Viral Inoculation of Saws. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 409, 708-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb26910.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bühler, C., Hammon, H., Rossi, G.L. and Blum, J.W. (1998) Small Intestinal Morphology in Eight-Day-Old Calves Fed Colostrum for Different Durations or Only Milk Replacer and Treated with Long-R3-Insulin-Like Growth Factor I and Growth Hormone. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 758-765. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.763758x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGuirk S.M. (2008) Disease Management of Dairy Calves and Heifers. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 24, 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.10.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M.A., Weary, D.M. and Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2011) Invited Review: Effects of Milk Ration on Solid Feed Intake, Weaning, and Performance in Dairy Heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 1071-1081. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3733</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernández-Castellano L.E., Súarez-Trujillo, A., Martel-Jaizme, D., Cugno, G., Argüello, A. and Castro, N. (2015) The Effect of Colostrum Period Management on BW and Immune System in Lambs: From Birth to Weaning. Animal, 9, 1672-1679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111500110X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malmuthuge, N., Chen, Y., Liang, G., Goonewardene, L.A. and Guan, L.L. (2015) Heat Treated Colostrum Feeding Promotes Beneficial Bacteria Colonization in the Small Intestine of Neonatal Calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 8044-8053. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9607</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malmuthuge N. and Guan, L.L. (2017) Understanding the Gut Microbiome of Dairy Calves: Opportunities to Improve Life Gut Health. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 5996-6005. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12239</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Hara, M.T.E., Song, Y., Fischer, A.J., He, Z., Steele, M.A. and Guan, L.L. (2019) Altered-Mucosa Associated Microbiota in the Ileum and Colon of Neonatal Calves in Response to Delayed First Colostrum Feeding. Journal of Dairy Science, 102, 7073-7086. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Godden, S. (2008) Colostrum Management for Dairy Calves. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 24, 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.10.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120689-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Colditz</surname><given-names> I.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>Some Mechanisms Regulating Nutrient Utilisation in Livestock during Immune Activation: An Overview</article-title><source> Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture</source><volume> 44</volume>,<fpage> 453</fpage>-<lpage>457</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>