<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2022.1310059</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-120535</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Intake Nutritional Variabilities of &lt;i&gt;Saba senegalensis&lt;/i&gt; Fruits
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sarr</surname><given-names>Médoune Gaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diouf</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayessou</surname><given-names>Nicolas Cyrille</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cissé</surname><given-names>Mady</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sakho</surname><given-names>Mama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diop</surname><given-names>Codou Gueye Mar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Université Assane Seck de Ziguinchor, Ziguinchor, Sénégal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique, Centre d’Etudes sur la Sécurité Alimentaire et le Développement des Molécules fonctionnelles (CESAM), Dakar Fann, Sénégal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>826</fpage><lpage>834</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Saba senegalensis
   is a popular wild fruit; w
  h
  ich is consumed as such or transformed into various products. Despite its economic potential, its nutritional potential 
  is
   unknown. The objective of this study is to characterize its fruits according to Senegal
  ’
  s main production areas. The study included five samples from five geographical areas of Senegal. Parameters measured include pH, protein, lipids, ash, moisture, vitamin C, carotenoids, polyphenols, minerals, and sugars. The results showed that for moisture, proteins, lipids, pH and reducing sugars did not differ significantly (p &lt;
   
  0.05%) for all accessions. Vitamin C content varies between 32.86 and 198.22 mg
  &amp;middot;
  100g
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
  , carotenoids with a content of between 5.05 and 9.12 mg
  &amp;middot;
  100g
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
  ; polyphenol contents are between 1.17 and 2.56 g
  &amp;middot;
  100g
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
  . The nutritional value of Saba fruits appears to be homogeneous in Senegal. A thorough study of the functional molecules seems necessary for a better appreciation of the potential of this fruit.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Saba senegalensis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Nutrition</kwd><kwd> Vitamine C</kwd><kwd> Polyph&#233;nols</kwd><kwd> Carotenoids</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Saba senegalensis is a non-woody and lianascent forest, its fruit is a large ovoid, bumpy, 7 - 10 cm long [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref2">2</xref>] and 6 - 8 cm wide which is coated with translucent yellow fibrous pulp only [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref2">2</xref>] . In Senegal, it is found in the regions of Casamance (southern Senegal) and Kedougou (eastern Senegal). It is a plant that has enormous economic virtues, from the fruit to the roots through the leaves, bark, and latex. The fruit is highly prized by the population and can be consumed or processed into puree, nectar, jams, preserves and jelly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref6">6</xref>] . Previous works showed that the fruit is very rich in vitamin C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref7">7</xref>] and is also characterized by water content closed to 80% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref8">8</xref>] . The titratable acidity is high and explains the acid taste of the fruit due to a malic acid concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref9">9</xref>] . One of the characteristics of Saba senegalensis is the level of β-carotene (vitamin A) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Despite its high economic potential, the fruit of Saba senegalensis remains under-exploited and its nutritional potential, according to secondary metabolite is unknown [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref11">11</xref>] . Therefore, the evaluation of the nutritional potential is needed to increase the value of this fruit by local populations. Then, macronutrients and micronutrients such as total minerals, polyphenol, sugar, ascorbic acid and carotenoides analysis were purchased. The objective of this study is to complete the physicochemical and biochemical plan of the fruit of Saba senegalensis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Collection and Sampling</title><p>The fruits are harvested in August 2016 in five sectors of two main production areas in Senegal (Bayla, Youtou, Niamone for Casamance’s; Bandafasse and Sal&#233;mata for K&#233;dougou’s region) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Lots of fruits are selected from different production areas, at similarly sized fruit of the same ripening stage. Three samples are collected for each site. Fruits are the opened and depulped. Each of the three samples was analyzed in triplicate analytical methods. The resulting amounts are stored at −80˚C.</p><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.2.1. Major Macronutrients</title><p>Many volumetric dosages have been carried out according to the procedure described in the AFNOR standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref12">12</xref>] such as pH by direct measure (NF V methods); the water content by dehydratation (method NF V 03-707); Total Lipids by Soxhlet (method NFV 03-905 standard); total crude protein by Kjeldhal’s method (NF 03-050 standard) and proteins were calculated using 5.7 as coefficient. The total minerals were determined after 3 hours incineration at 550˚C (V76-101 standard). The pulp acidity was titrated by using 0.1N Sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The value was expressed in mEg/100g of pulp wet matter.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.2.2. Micronutrients: Sugar, Ascorbic Acid, Polyphenols, Carotenoides and Minerals</title><p>The sugar composition was determined by Dionex DX600 HPLC, after using a</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Caract&#233;ristiques des zones d’&#233;chantillonnage</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Productions areas</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bayla</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Youtou</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Niamone</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bandafassi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salemata</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Department</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ziguinchor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oussouye</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bignona</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bandafasse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salemata</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Geographic coordinates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >latitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12˚53'39&quot;N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12˚22'47&quot;N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12˚44'33&quot;N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12˚32'22&quot;N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12˚37'42&quot;N</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >longitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16˚21'8&quot;W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16˚29'19&quot;W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16˚20'4&quot;W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12˚18'38&quot;W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12˚48'59&quot;W</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>volume of 80% ethanol for extraction. A CarboPac MA1 (4 &#215; 250 mm; 7.5 μm) colon was used, and 0.6 to 0.8 of NaOH solution, with a 0.4 mL/min constituted the mobile phase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref13">13</xref>] . The ascorbic acid was quantified by using HPLC RP 18<sup>e</sup> Licrospher 100 column (Spectra SCM 1000Thermo Scientifique) with 0.01% of isocratic H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> elution and 254 nm detection of UV 3000 Spectra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref13">13</xref>] . Carotenoids contents were determined by HPLC (1100 Agilent with iodine detector) after extraction using mixture of ethanol/hexane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref14">14</xref>] . The total polyphenols of each sample were defined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The dilute aqueous solution of each extract (0.5 ml) was mixed with the Folin Ciocalteu reagent (0.2 N, 2.5 ml) for 5 minutes and then 2 ml of sodium carbonate solution (75 g·L<sup>−1</sup> in water) was added. After 2 hours of incubation, the absorbances were measured at 760 nm and traced by gallic acid acid (0-200 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>). The results were expressed in mg of equivalents of gallic acid (GAE) per 100 g of fruit weight. For minerals determination, a mineralization at 500 ˚C was conducted and desilication with fluorihydric acid was performed after weighting. The detection of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, copper, zinc and iron were realized by using a spectrophotometer of plasma radiation with inductive coupling of Varian-vista type.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_3"><title>2.2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>All statistical analyzes were carried out with the software R (version 3.2.4, 2016). Principal component analysis (PCA) and numerical classification were performed on the physicochemical and biochemical data in order to find the best correlations between the random variables. Also, the results obtained were studied by correlation analyzes (Pearson correlation coefficients) between the different parameters. To compare the means, the variance analyzes with the Fisher LSD test at the 5% significance level were also performed.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Proximate and Mineral Nutrients</title><p>The results of physicochemical and biochemical analyzes of Saba senegalensis’s fruits of the five (5) localities are recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Data processing by variance analysis shows that there is no significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) of pH, water content, protein, lipid, and reducing sugar levels of samples from different origin. According to that, the characteristic mean values to be considered are 2.79 for the pH, 74.77% for the humidity; 0.22% for proteins; 1.25% for lipids; 13.38% for reducing sugars.</p><p>However, significant differences depending on the collection sites are noted on the other parameters measured. The titratable acidity represented by citric acid ranges from 2.33 (Youtou) to 1.85 g·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Niamone). Bayla recorded higher ascorbic acid (198.22 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>) followed by Youtou (154.96 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>) and Niamone (145.59 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>). These levels are well above the average value for all localities combined (118.02 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>). In addition, the fruits collected in Bandafasse and Sal&#233;mata have vitamin C contents lower than the average value of any locality being respectively 58.450 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> and 32.862 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>. The total sugar content varies from 12.68 (Sal&#233;mata) to 15.1 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Bandafasse).</p><p>The ash contents are low but no difference is noted between the samples of Bayla (1.15 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), Niamone (1.52 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), Youtou (1.29 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), Bandafasse (1.44 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) and Sal&#233;mata (1.45 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>).</p><p>The polyphenol contents are variable for all localities. Indeed, the highest content was recorded on the Sal&#233;mata samples (2.56 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) followed by Niamone (2.24 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), Bandafasse (1.94 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), Youtou (1.68 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) and Bayla (1.17 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>). The carotenoid content varied depending on the collection areas. It is more important at Youtou (9.12 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) followed by Sal&#233;mata (7.20 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), Bayla (7.11 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) and Niamone (6.86 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>). These last three datas did not show significant differences, however these values are very different from those of Bandafassi (5.05 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>).</p><p>The highest glucose levels are 3.66 and 3.19 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>, respectively for the fruits collected at Bandafasse and Bayla but those from Youtou (3.14 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), Sal&#233;mata (2.50 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) and Niamone (3.03 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) are weaker and similar. For fructose, the highest fructose fruits are recorded at Bayla (3.52 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) and the lowest in Sal&#233;mata (1.76 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the mineral composition of the pulp of the five localities. The results show that the calcium contents are very variable: from 113.86 (Bandafasse) to 1279.2 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Niamone); the potassium from 151.15 (Youtou) at 218.03 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Bandafasse); the sodium from 0.82 (Salemata) to 23.59 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Bayla); the magnesium from 24.03 (Youtou) to 30.91 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Bandafasse); the phosphorus from 9.86 (Youtou) to 13.98 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Salemata); the iron from 0.89 (Youtou) to 1.77 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> (Niamone).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Principal Components Analysis</title><p>A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to evaluate the effect of provenance on the physicochemical and biochemical characteristics of the collected fruits. The results show that the two axes express 75.20% of the total variance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). A significant portion of the information contained in the data table is retained. The pH variables, total sugars, reducing sugars and glucose are positively well correlated with the first axis, while the water content variables, lipids and carotenoids are negatively. The parameters used to evaluate the sweet and acidic taste of fruits are well aligned on this first dimension (Dim 1), which could be considered as an organoleptic axis. The second dimension (Dim 2) is characterized by the polyphenol and ash variables that are positively correlated, as well as the fructose and vitamin C variables that are negatively correlated. Thus, this second dimension could be considered as the axis of the antioxidant potential of the fruits. The dimensions axes (Dim1 and Dim 2) delimit the types of fruits collected. The position on the axis Dim 1 differentiates the fruits rich in proteins, glucose, reducing sugars, total sugars and pH (Bandafasse), with the other fruits characterized by low acidity, moisture, lipids and carotenoids (Youtou).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Physicochemical and biochemical characteristics of Saba senegalensis from five geographical areas of Senegal</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SOUTHERN REGION</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EASTEN REGION</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Param&#232;tres</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Youtou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bayla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Niamone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sal&#233;mata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bandafasse</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.16 &#177; 1.06<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.77 &#177; 0.84<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.34 &#177; 0.93<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.34 &#177; 0.27<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.24&#177; 0.43<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prot&#233;ins (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.03<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24 &#177; 0.01<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21 &#177; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipids (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66 &#177; 0.51<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96 &#177; 0.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10 &#177; 0.26<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33 &#177; 0.20<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16 &#177; 0.05<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72 &#177; 0.11<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85 &#177; 0.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 &#177; 0.02<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75 &#177; 0.05<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81 &#177; 0.08<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Titrable acidity (mE/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.80 &#177; 0.53<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.80 &#177; 5.21<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.62 &#177; 1.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.91 &#177; 0.52<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.70 &#177; 6.02<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Citric Acid (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33 &#177; 1.16<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27 &#177; 0.75<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85 &#177; 0.57<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99 &#177; 1.17<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15 &#177; 1.66<sup>ac</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Sugar (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.12 &#177; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.78 &#177; 0.66<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.09 &#177; 0.63<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.68 &#177; 0.36<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.15 &#177; 1.81<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reducting Sugar (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.02 &#177; 0.58<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.14 &#177; 0.26<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.35 &#177; 0.04<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.83 &#177; 1.16<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.57 &#177; 0.69<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glucose (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14 &#177; 0.18<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.19 &#177; 0.59<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.02 &#177; 0.20<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50 &#177; 0.30<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66 &#177; 0.39<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fructose (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 &#177; 0.00<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52 &#177; 0.25<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.781 &#177; 0.37<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.762 &#177; 0.01<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.17 &#177; 0.06<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascorbic acid (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.96 &#177; 28.43<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.22 &#177; 13.11<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145.59 &#177; 34.39<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.86 &#177; 10.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.45 &#177; 7.95<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyphenols (g GAE/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68 &#177; 0.01<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17 &#177; 0.05<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24 &#177; 0.02<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56 &#177; 0.27<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94 &#177; 0.03<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caroteno&#239;ds (mg/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.12 &#177; 0.34<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.111 &#177; 0.61<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.86 &#177; 0.03<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.202 &#177; 0.54<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.05 &#177; 0.07<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash (g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29 &#177; 0.07<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.06<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52 &#177; 0.01<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45 &#177; 0.20<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 &#177; 0.21<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The values presented in the table are an average of 3 independent analyzes &#177; standard deviation. The letters (a-e) in the same column of the table indicate significant differences (P &lt; 0.05, Fisher’s LSD test).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Minerals composition of Saba senegalensis from five geographical areas of Senegal</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals (mg/100g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bayla</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Niamone</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Youtou</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bandafasse</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sal&#233;mata</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0,8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>However, the position on the Dim 2 axis contrasts fruits with a content of polyphenols and ashes (Salemata and Niamone), fruits with low levels of citric acid, fructose and vitamin C (Bayla). Thus, the fruits of Saba senegalensis have been grouped into three classes. The first class consists of fruits from Bandafasse. Class 2 consists of fruits from Niamone and Salemata. Finally, class 3 consists of fruits collected at Youtou and Bayla. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>)</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Discussion</title><p>Average pH values between 2.72 and 2.85 give the fruit an acidic character. These pH values are slightly higher than 2.24 found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref15">15</xref>] . These pH values are</p><p>correctly correlate with the high levels of total and citric acidity which respectively vary between (37.80 and 69.80 mEq/100g) and (2.33 to 1.85 g/100g). These later values are close to that found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref9">9</xref>] whose titratable acidity value was 30.44 mEq·100g<sup>−1</sup>. Compared to other locally sourced local fruits, the fruit of Saba senegalensis seems more acidic than Detarium senegalensis with a pH of 3.51 and 23 - 45 mEq·100g<sup>−1</sup> of titratable acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref16">16</xref>] and Sclerocarya birrea with a pH of 3.66 - 3.95 and a titratable acidity of 15.1 - 19.9 mEq·100g<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref17">17</xref>] ; it is less acidic than baobab (Adansonia digitata) fruits with a pH of 1.89 and acidity of 97 - 144 mEq·100g<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref13">13</xref>] . The combined low pH and high acidity gives the fruit of Saba senegalensis a very good aptitude for conservation and thus a great advantage for technological issues. The value of crude protein (0.282 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) is lower than that found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref9">9</xref>] which were respectively 0.8% and 0.3%. The weakness of Saba fruit in lipid (0.96 to 1.66 g/100g<sup>−1</sup>) and protein (0.21 to 0.24 g/100g<sup>−1</sup>), seem to be characteristic of fruits. Concerning the vitamin C contents of the Saba fruits, they are between 32.86 and 198.22 mg/100g. The zones of the Casamance region stand out; Bayla, Youtou, Niamone are the zones giving the richest fruits in ascorbic acid (198.22, 154, 96 and 145.59 respectively) whereas those of K&#233;dougou give the weakest namely Salemata and Bandafasse with respective values of 32.86 and 58.45 mg/100g. The sampling area may affect the vitamin C content of the fruits. Indeed, these first three zones share the same climatic conditions. Significant differences between samples are likely due to ecological conditions. These vitamin C contents are higher than results indicated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref7">7</xref>] which were between 34.8 and 67.5 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref9">9</xref>] : 16 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>. The vitamin C content of Saba senegalensis is lower than that of Detarium senegalensis (1200 to 2200 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>), A. digitata (125 to 312 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref13">13</xref>] and Ficus gnaphalocarpa (487 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref18">18</xref>] . However, the vitamin C content of the samples studied is higher than those established for other fruits which all vary between 1.42 and 3.9 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup> such as tamarind, soursop, pineapple, fruit passion, mango [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref20">20</xref>] , and Sclerocarya birrea 16.44 mg/100g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref17">17</xref>] . Carotenoids are responsible for the orange-yellow coloring of fruits. In this study, the fruits of the Youtou and Bayla localities showed a great variability of carotenoid contents with extreme values of 1.13 and 2.47 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The impact of pedoclimatic conditions, stage of maturity at harvest and storage conditions of fruits are all factors that may explain these variations. These values show us that Saba fruits are good sources of carotenoids. Polyphenols exhibit antioxidant, antiviral, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref19">19</xref>] . Although variable, the levels of polyphenols found during this study (1.17 - 2.56 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) are slightly higher than that indicated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref7">7</xref>] which was 0.94 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>, However, these values are comparable to those of A. digitata (2.5 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>) fruits of Hibiscus sabdarifa (1.34 - 3.73 g) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref13">13</xref>] . They are higher than those found for mango (68 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>), banana (51 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>), pineapple 47 mg·100g<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref20">20</xref>] , apple (180 mg EAG/100g) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref21">21</xref>] . Water is the main constituent of the fruit of S. senegalensis with an average value of 74.77 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>. This value is lower than that found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref15">15</xref>] (80 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>), but it is well above the value of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref9">9</xref>] (48 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>). On the other hand, it is comparable to several fruits such as Detarium senegalensis and Cucurbita which have respective values of 62.59% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref16">16</xref>] and 75.54% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref22">22</xref>] . Amount of water explains the perishable nature of the fruit. The total sugars of Saba are mainly composed of reducing sugars which is closed to 88% of the total sugar quantity. The reducing sugars are essentially composed of glucose (3.19 and 3.66 g&#183;100g<sup>−1</sup>) and fructose (1.76 to 3.52 g&#183;100g<sup>−1</sup>). This profile in simple carbohydrate remains a handicap for the conservation of the fruit while facilitating the fermentation.</p><p>The total mineral content of the pulp of S. senegalensis varies between 1.52 and 1.15 g·100g<sup>−1</sup>. This value is lower than that found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120535-ref9">9</xref>] which is 2.8 g&#183;100g<sup>−1</sup>. The pulp is rich in mineral compounds (P, Mg and Fe). As in most fruits, potassium and calcium predominate and sodium is almost non-existent.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The analysis of Saba fruits collected in the main production areas confirmed the acidity of the fruit due mainly to citric acid and showed a high content of polyphenols, ascorbic acid and carotenoids. The Casamance area offers fruit richer in vitamin C. Nevertheless, a thorough study of the functional molecules should be carried out as the different profiles of polyphenols, and carotenoids as well as the antioxidant activity. The aromatic profile will also be very useful to better evaluate the potential of this highly appreciated fruit.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Gaye, S.M., Paul, D., Cyrille, A.N., Mady, C., Mama, S. and Mar, D.C.G. (2022) Intake Nutritional Variabilities of Saba senegalensis Fruits. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 13, 826-834. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2022.1310059</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.120535-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AFTD (Agro Forestree Database) (2016) http://www.worldagroforestry.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haddad, C. (2000) Wild Fruit from Senegal. University of Montpellier, Montpellier, 372 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fall, T. (2001) Study on the Collection and Analysis of Data on Non-Timber Forest Products in Senegal Dakar. Partnership Program CE-FAO (1998-2001), 37 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leeuwenberg, A.J.M. and van Dilst, F.J.H. (1989) Saba (Pichon). Series of Revisions of Apocynaceae XXVII. Bulletin du Jardin botanique National de Belgique, 59, 189-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/3668165</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burkill, H.M. (2000) The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. Vol. 2, Royal Botanical Garden, Kew. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, 636 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arbonnier, M. (2000) Trees, Shrubs and Creepers from the Dry Areas of West Africa. CIRAD/MNHN/UICN, Mauguio.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nafan, D, Jesus, F.I., Souleymane, S., Lenifere, S.C., Emmanuel, I.A. and Abdourahamane, S. (2013) Genetic Variation of Saba Senegalensis Pychon (Apocynaceae) and Few Nutritionnal Value. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 1, 121-135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Favier, J.C., Ireland-Ripert, J., Laussucq, C. and Feinberg, M. (1993) Répertoire général des aliments: 3. Table de composition des fruits exotiques, fruits de cueillette d’Afrique. ORSTOM édition, Lavoisier Tec &amp; Doc, INRA édition, Paris, 243 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boamponsem, G.A., Johnson, F.S., Mahunu, G.K. and Awiniboya, S.F. (2013) Determination of Biochemical Composition of Saba senegalensis (Saba Fruit). Journal of Plant Science and Research, 3, 31-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kini, F., Saba, A., Parkouda, C., Ouedraogo, S. and Guissou, P. (2012) Partial Phytochemical Characterization of the Fruits of Saba senegalensis (Apocynacaea) and Landolphia heudolotii (Apocynaceae). Pharmacopee et Medecine Traditionnelle Africaines, 16, 32-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarr, M.G., Nafissatou, N.D., Ayessou, N.C., Faye, P.G., Cisse, M., Sakho, M. and Diop, C.M. (2018) Saba senegalensis: Key Features and Uses. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 9, 1099-1111. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2018.99080</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AFNOR (Association Francaise de normalisation) (1981) Recueil des normes francaises des produits dérives des fruits et légumes, jus de fruits. Paris, 327 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cisse, M., Sakho, M., Dornier, M., Diop, C.M., Reynes, M. and Sock, O. (2009) Caractérisation du fruit du baobab et étude de sa transformation en nectar. Fruits, 64, 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2008052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhuique-Mayer, C., Caris-Veyrat, C., Ollitrault, P., Curk, F. and Amiot, M.-J. (2005) Varietal and Interspecific Influence on Micronutrient Contents in Citrus from the Mediterranean Area. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 2140-2145. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0402983</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berhaut, J. (1971) Flore illustrée du Sénégal. Clairafrique, Dakar, 626 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diop, N. (2013) Caractérisation du Ditax (Detarium senegalense J.F.Gmel) et étude de sa Transformation en Nectar. l’Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, 148 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sene, A.L., Niang, K., Faye, G., Ayessou, N., Sagna, M.B., Cisse, M., Diallo, A., et al. (2018) Identification des usages de Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich) Hoscht Dans la Zone Du Ferlo (Sénégal) et évaluation du potentiel biochimique et nutritionnel de son fruit. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Développement, 18, 13470-13487. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.82.17015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cyrille, A.N., Ndiaye C., Mady, C., Gueye, M. and Mama, S. (2011) Nutritional Contribution of Some Senegalese Forest Fruits Running across Soudano-Sahelian Zone. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2, 606-612. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.26085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muanda, F.N. (2010) Identification de polyphénols, évaluation de leur activité antioxydante et étude de leurs propriétés biologiques. Université Paul Verlaine, Metz, 55-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peroumal, A. (2014) Caractérisation des fruits et de la pulpe de six accessions de Mammea americana: Aptitude à la transformation des fruits et caractérisation des composes phénoliques de la pulpe. université des Antilles et de la Guyane, Antilles-Guyane, 192 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brat, P., Georgé, S., Bellamy, A., Du Chaffaut, L., Scalbert, A., Mennen, L., Arnault, N. and Amiot, M.J. (2006) Daily Polyphenol Intake in France from Fruit and Vegetables. The Journal of Nutrition, 136, 2368-2373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.9.2368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120535-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blessing, A.C., Ifeyanyi, U.M. and Chijioke, O.B. (2011) Nutritionnal Evaluations of Some Nigerian Pumpkings. Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology, 5, 64-71.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>