<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJET</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Engineering and Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2331-4222</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjet.2022.104050</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJET-120323</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Autonomous Vehicle Technologies Effects the Automotive Concept Design Stages with AHP Method
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fuat</surname><given-names>Ali Paker</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Industrial Design Department of Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul, Turkey</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>768</fpage><lpage>789</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In the automotive concept design stages, functionally positioning the newly introduced autonomous technologies or remodelling the vehicle accordingly and evaluating the steps or determining the workload together with the collaboration intensity in the current flow is the initial step for the entire process efficiency. Therefore, the main purpose of the research is to reveal the effects of the autonomous technologies, which are newly included in the automotive concept design stages in automotive manufacturing industry companies that continue their lives under heavy competition conditions, according to the order of importance. The objective of this research is to both increase the efficiency of automotive concept design stages and to determine the measurement of the effects of new autonomous vehicle technologies in practice. Under the AHP method used in the research, the automotive concept design stages constitute the alternatives in the order of importance of the working structure, as well as the application variables of autonomous vehicle technologies, the criteria of the mathematical model. In addition, the research method modelled in the study, under the AHP mathematical model, reveals the performances or order of importance of the automotive concept design stages under autonomous technologies. Therefore, the resulting process performances constitute important inputs for efficiency and optimization studies under different research approaches. When the results of the study are examined, due to the high level of influence on the new vehicle concept design performance in automotive industry companies, the adaptation or application steps of autonomous vehicle technologies create new needs in the whole process. The determination of innovation creation clusters in the design process steps or the selection of the density of new technology adaptation in the stages and the order of importance provide a competitive advantage along with optimization in the basic functions of the automotive industry companies. However, the determination of new workload clusters in the mentioned automotive concept design process steps or the effect of autonomous technologies in the design stages, selection, transfer from theory to practice, multiple conflicting criteria and uncertain parameters create a very complex situation. For all these reasons, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is one of the widely used multi-criteria decision-making tools, is considered as a suitable approach for creating such order of importance and solving problems. In this study, an AHP mathematical model was created that determines the workload clusters created by autonomous vehicle technology applications that have just begun to guide the automotive concept design process, which is the main function of automotive manufacturing industry companies. Therefore, in line with the innovations, changes and adequacy criteria created by the current automotive concept design stages in the new autonomous vehicle technology adaptation, a stage order of importance has been selected.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>AHP</kwd><kwd> Automotive Industry</kwd><kwd> Autonomous Vehicle Technology</kwd><kwd> Automotive Concept Design</kwd><kwd> Lean Product Development</kwd><kwd> Design Process</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, technological superiority led by, especially developed countries in the world and its application in the market has led many developing countries to seek. The exemplary mathematical model or new approach created in the research is to reveal the application effects of new autonomous technologies on the stages of vehicle design, together with quantitative values, in qualitative depth. Therefore, the new approach planned in the study stems from the remodeling of the performance criteria created by the flow particles against innovations rather than the product or process selection realized with the AHP method. It shows that it is not a coincidence that countries are able to meet their specific requirements for new product, original design or service design at a level that can compete globally (innovation management, new technology acquisition or adaptation, and time), on the contrary, it is the result of a systematic study. For this reason, especially automotive industry companies have turned to the important effect of choosing the appropriate process step sequence or rearranging new concept design steps in order to ensure the adaptation and application of autonomous vehicle technologies, which are added every day, on the vehicle. The purpose of determining the workload clusters focused on new technology adaptation at the stages constituting the automotive concept design process and choosing the order of importance of the implementation steps; ensuring that the innovation or technology required by an automotive industry company is compatible with the entire new product development flow and the main process stakeholders who undertake to realize it at the desired time, with acceptable implementation costs or new software hardware needs, has a positive effect on the final new product. In the study, the order of importance of the stages in question or the workload intensity selection process of the steps creates a broad comparison structure formed by new and different autonomous technology features by using both quantitative and qualitative criteria that contradict each other. Therefore, the basic criteria used in examining potential new stages and specializations or existing disciplines on the verge of change differ according to the needs of the companies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref5">5</xref>]. In addition, the most popular criteria considered by decision makers in the evaluation of the process stages or in the selection of the order of importance according to the workload and innovation contribution of the stages; price/cost, design capability, product development process efficiency, resource management, innovation and technology management, research and development, flexibility, brand, product, risk, security, etc. constitute the main variables. It is a multi-criteria decision problem that includes the measurement of the effects of the stages that make up the particles of the holistic process on the final innovation, the selection decision or order of importance, and the evaluation of new and different criteria. Evaluating the impact of the sub-stages that support the basic process on the result or determining the priorities creates focus in the diffusion triggered by the innovation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Today, automotive industry companies are compared using various methods as a result of the performance measurement of many criteria such as design and new product development, innovation management, new product, manufacturing, cost, sales and delivery, and the results obtained from the final comparison are to perform important functions in the organizational structure, it constitutes the necessary inputs for developing, resource management or making long or short-term investment decisions. In this context, multi-criteria decision-making methods; It is a frequently preferred method in today’s research in terms of ordering the importance of the determined alternatives, making selection, evaluation and classification among the alternatives, and finally, the results obtained are suitable and applicable. In this study; in the automotive industry, which has a critical importance in the high economic returns of the nations, in 3 local and 3 global automotive industry companies that carry out automotive concept design activities together with manufacturing; together with the determination of the workload and operational needs created by the autonomous vehicle technology parts carried out on a project basis in practice; is aimed to measure the order of importance.</p><p>The innovations and workload in the application of the said new autonomous vehicle technology parts are driven by the reasons for the development of the new technology or the technical competence in the application problems of the new technology. In addition, the inter-firm design collaboration model, which will benefit from critical technology, reveals the determination of resource management or investment priority, together with software and hardware investments of similar variables in practice. Determining the priorities of the resource needs created by autonomous vehicle technologies, which have just entered the automotive concept design stages, increases the success rate of priority order adaptation studies. On the other hand, renewing all of the automotive concept design stages at the same time, creates undefined values for the measurement of value creation and conservation. However, the workload intensity and innovation management in the technology applications of the automotive design stages of the main and sub-criteria in the working model have a great importance in competition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref10">10</xref>]. Therefore, the measurement of flow stages with appropriate methods or the selection and order of importance by evaluating the flow steps is the initial step for process optimization. For the solution of the problem, the mathematical model included in the AHP method was constructed and multi-criteria decision-making steps were applied in the study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref12">12</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. AHP Analytical Hierarchy Process</title><p>The evaluation of the efficiency of the process stages or the determination of the importance values of the stages that make up the process creates mathematical data for the simultaneous functioning and balance of the entire flow. The order of importance of a flow or critical selection problem is a subject that is frequently addressed and of great importance for businesses, and there are many studies on the product, part or system preference problem type [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref15">15</xref>]. When the aforementioned studies are examined, the commonly identified process or supply channel selection problem; price, performance, efficiency, product, part, system and service, similar variable structures were determined as the main criteria and appropriate alternatives were examined and measured. The AHP method measures the selection rank or efficiency within the approach of determining the importance of the main criteria and sub-criteria. Considering that the alternatives included in the calculations are formed at different values as a result of a process, because of the complex nature of the selection problem, feedbacks, interactions and too many criteria, it turns out that effective and realistic criteria for the solution are in an analytical network structure. Millet (2002) defined the machine selection problem for a company operating in the manufacturing sector and applied the AHP multi-criteria decision-making method for machine selection, since many qualitative and quantitative criteria should be considered together for the right machine selection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref16">16</xref>]. In their studies, Paker (2018) and Chan (2002) weighed all the main and sub-criteria related to the problem, in which the importance effect of the stages forming the whole flow in the process was evaluated, and 26 process stakeholders, professional software, hardware, number of employees were evaluated in depth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref18">18</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Automotive Concept Design Stages</title><p>Automotive concept design stages are the first step in the new and lean product development process where innovations and project goals are determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref21">21</xref>]. Therefore, the features of the new vehicle to be designed, the requests and expectations from the users or the improvements on the product that has been designed and entered into mass production, (aftermarket claim parts, critical fabrication parts, cost reductions, etc.) takes place in the automotive concept design phase, which is at the beginning of the project. Keeping the customer requests and expectations at the forefront among the project objectives is very important for the concept design phase because all new product development studies and disciplines will move in this direction. In the automotive concept design phase, vehicle design alternatives with targeted innovations and desired features are being developed. For example, if lidar, one of the autonomous technology parts, will be adapted or designed on the vehicle, by creating various combinations of form, capacity, size, location, serviceability and similar features, concept design alternatives and clay model prototypes are developed and evaluated by subjecting them to various tests. Until the compatibility of the said new piece of technology with the new concept design alternatives produces a satisfactory result; renewal and modification of prototypes continues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref20">20</xref>]. In addition, in the adaptations of new technology pieces like this, involvement of relevant expertise in automotive concept design phases, guiding or part location approval prevents repetitive development in the next new product development steps. This approach, in the creation or preservation of value within the entire current lean and new product development process, provides significant efficiency definition and advantage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>Elementarily, the purpose of the automotive concept design stages, to define the long-term new vehicle project goals for lean product development engineering stages, under the boundary conditions within the vehicle body structure, to eliminate the errors and deficiencies in terms of application of innovations on the product and to deliver the perfect new product to mass production. In addition, the studies to determine the position and function of the new technology parts on the body structure, which were realized during the automotive concept design stages, reveals the design of the product’s needs for usage performance along with it. Designing a functional vehicle with the features expected by the new automotive product user and implementing the project innovations within this scope is the main focus for the concept design stages. For example, a truck manufacturer automotive industry company, while designing the truck it produces in line with the expectations of its customers, primarily aims to make the vehicle go from point A to point B quickly, easily and efficiently by carrying a certain load. Therefore, the design of an autonomous truck in accordance with its target customer group includes autonomous vehicle technologies and systems as innovations in the project objectives, again in the appropriate technology, in line with technical and economic possibilities.</p><p>Automotive concept design stages in new vehicle projects, while applying new technologies and autonomous vehicle parts and the functional structure brought by the parts on the vehicle, it either makes the vehicle suitable for technology adaptation, or it can adapt the technology to suit the vehicle. These two sharp distinctions are carried out in direct proportion to the position of the supplier of the new technology piece or the role of the patent owner of the automotive industry company. In today’s global automotive industry, targeted innovations or new functions on the vehicle in the future are determined under autonomous vehicle technologies, and necessary part developments are designed under business structures with multi-brand, multi-disciplinary partnerships. Therefore, the development of new autonomous technologies, which are expected to be introduced in the automotive industry in the near future, continues under the global software and hardware R&amp;D enterprises established with the partnerships of global automotive industry companies. From a commercial point of view, since the information required for the development of autonomous vehicle technology parts of these multi-partner R&amp;D structures comes from the partners, the right to sell the software and hardware suitable for the newly designed product belongs to the founding stakeholders.</p><p>Another important approach is, in the maintenance, repair and new version updates or adaptation to the vehicle of the semi-finished product created by the R&amp;D enterprises established for the design and development of new autonomous vehicle technologies is to present a reliable design that will not cause any problems that the customer may experience in the future, causing losses in both automotive products and the main brand image. In addition, in such cases, the design and form of the new vehicle concept lags behind the functional usage features of the new autonomous technology. On the other hand, in the adaptation of the new autonomous technology and usage functions within the sample, the automotive concept design stages realize the functional packaging adaptation of the new technology within the vehicle body concept. As an approach the form, form, closure of a new piece of technology can be considered as an extension of innovation and affects the acceptance of the product by the consumer. During the automotive concept design stages, the functional usage features of the new technology or the application criteria and adaptation tolerance information are collected by the developer of the technology before the new autonomous vehicle technology parts are functionally packaged in a form structure inside the vehicle body. Therefore, in order for the new autonomous vehicle technology to be packaged in the automotive concept design stages and to have a functional form structure, it receives phase transition approval in new product development engineering disciplines together with the developer of this technology. In addition, implementation decisions are made for the new autonomous technologies included with the project objectives, both in the initial stages of the automotive concept in the adaptation of the first vehicle, and afterwards, together with the engineering studies related to the expertise in new product development processes.</p><p>Compliance approval tests of the part are carried out with intensive studies at every flow step with new product development engineering in the continuation of the process of new autonomous vehicle technologies, which are included in the automotive concept design stages with new on-vehicle adaptations. This cycle continues until the new autonomous vehicle technology piece fulfils its function on the vehicle. After the new project targets are given at the beginning of the automotive concept design stages, preliminary information is obtained from all new product development specialists through design sketches along with the usage scenarios that can fulfil these targets. In the automotive concept design phase, which is the first process of new product development, even if the initial concept designs made on paper from the expertise and engineering departments in the continuation of the process are a bit of an exaggeration, adaptation problems of new technology or design alternatives that are impossible or difficult to produce are rearranged and some changes are made. In the automotive concept design stages, where the new project goals are embodied and form, after the vehicle is approved to be produced at the desired innovation level and within the acceptable investment cost limits, detailed engineering tests and analyses begin in the new product development process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>When evaluating alternative vehicle concepts, the way the outer body structure accommodates technology parts or demonstrates innovation, the number of parts, the method of joining parts, tolerances and the complexity of the product are among the factors that affect the final concept selection. The aim is to select the alternatives with the most preferable value in the market among the concept design alternatives that meet the functional requirements of new technologies or to define the modification. In the selection at the end of the automotive concept design stages, especially the technical drawings that clearly show the new vehicle design, the selection of all materials, machinery and equipment to be used in production and their placement, plant capacity and many other issues, together with investment decisions, the process is related to new product development disciplines.</p><p>In order for the new vehicle design data revealed by the automotive concept design stages to not lose value in new product development processes, innovations are approved by the automotive concept design department at each stage transition, this time until the product is implemented (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). With the introduction of new product development processes, the automotive concept design stages pass into a status that gives approval for the implementation of the targeted innovations in the body structure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Since the changes to be made for the approved vehicle concept to go into production lead to both time and cost losses, each modification is thoroughly examined and approved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120323-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>After the concept vehicle design is transferred to the new product development stages, and after the process flow or studies are completed, physical and virtual road tests, trial productions and final trials of the new automotive product are carried out as the final process (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). After seeking answers to questions such as whether the design was made as desired, whether it could meet customer expectations, and whether there was a need for changes, if the answers are positive, the promotional part of the business comes into play and by focusing on issues such as introducing the product to the market and informing the</p>
</sec></body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.120323-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cross, N. (2010) Design Thinking as a Form of Intelligence. Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS8) Interpreting Design Thinking, Sydney, 19-20 October 2010, 99-105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S. (2011) Product Design and Development. McGraw Hill, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ullman, D. (2009) The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw Hill, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goffin, K. and Micheli, P. (2010) Maximizing the Value of Industrial Design in New Product Development. Research-Technology Management, 53, 29-37.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2010.11657648</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weber, J. (2009) Automotive Development Processes: Processes for Successful Customer Oriented Vehicle Development. Springer Science &amp; Business Media, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xia, W. and Wu, Z. (2007) Supplier Selection with Multiple Criteria in Volume Discount Environments. Omega, 35, 494-504.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, E.K., Ha, S. and Kim, S.K. (2001) Supplier Selection and Management System Considering Relationships in Supply Chain Management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.946529</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Handfield, R., Walton, S.V., Sroufe, R. and Melnyk, S.A. (2002) Applying Environmental Criteria to Supplier Assessment: A Study in the Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 70-87.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Denzler, P. and Wiktorsson, M. (2016) Maximising Product Possibilities while Minimising Process Change: A Case of Introducing Light Weight Material in Automotive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 50, 270-274.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saaty, T.L. (1990) How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saaty, T.L. (1990) An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”. Management Science, 36, 259-268.  
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saaty, T.L. (1986) Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32, 841-855. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ho, W., Xu, X. and Dey, P.K. (2010) Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Yang, B., Wu, Y. and Yin, M. (2008) Supplier Selection Modeling and Analysis Based on Polychromatic Sets. In: Xu, L.D., Min Tjoa, A. and Chaudhry, S.S., Eds., Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems II, Springer, Berlin, 1481-1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76312-5_80</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wind, Y. and Saaty, T.L. (1980) Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 26, 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millet, I. and Wedley, W.C. (2002) Modelling Risk and Uncertainty with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11, 97-107.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.319</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paker, F.A., Alppay, C. and Sertyesilisik, B. (2018) Use of the AHP Methodology in Vehicle Design Process Dynamics: Determination of the Most Effective Concept Phases for the New Automotive Product. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 8, 312-330. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2018.84017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, F.T.S. (2002) Design of Material Handling Equipment Selection System: An Integration of Expert System with Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060210411512</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, D. and Pettit, S. (2009) A Consideration of the Relevance of Lean Supply Chain Concepts for Humanitarian Aid Provision. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12, 430-444.  
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2009.025817</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paker, F.A. (2020) Lean Product Development Process with Design Verification Stages in the Value Stream of Automotive Industry. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 11, 37-60. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2021.111003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paker, F.A. (2020) The “Static” and “Dynamic” Design Verification Stages of the Lean Development Process: Automotive Industry. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8, 74-91. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2020.81008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lawson, S. (2018) Roads that Cars Can Read REPORT III: Tackling the Transition to Automated Vehicles.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bacha, A., Bauman, C., Faruque, R., Fleming, M., Terwelp, C., Reinholtz, C., Webster, M., et al. (2008) Odin: Team Victortango’s Entry in the Darpa Urban Challenge. Journal of Field Robotics, 25, 467-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20248</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Surakka, T., Harri, F., Haahtela, T., Horila, A. and Michl, T. (2018) Regulation and Governance Supporting Systemic MaaS Innovations. Research in Transportation Business &amp; Management, 27, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120323-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z.Q., Yin, C. and Huang, Y.Y. (2009) Topsis-AHP-Simulation Method and Its Application in Operational Capability Evaluation. 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Guilin, 17-19 June 2009, 2954-2957.  
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2009.5191819</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>