<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJPed</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Pediatrics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8741</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojped.2022.124072</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJPed-120042</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Based on PK/PD and Monte Carlo Simulation Analysis of the Dosing Regimens of Micafungin in Children with Febrile Neutropenic
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiuli</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ying</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Junhui</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaolei</surname><given-names>Yu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaoqin</surname><given-names>Zhu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Oncology Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Clinic Pharmacy, Affiliated of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>711</fpage><lpage>717</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>31,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Neutropenia with fever is a special group of patients. Due to low immune
   function, inflammation-related clinical symptoms and signs are often not obvious, and pathogenic bacteria and infection focus are not clear. Fever may be the only sign of infection. If appropriate antimicrobial treatment is not given in time, infection-related mortality is high. In our study, we aimed to optimize the dosage regimen of Micafungin in children with febrile neutropenic against Candida spp. by Mote Carlo Simulation (MCS). Pharmacokinetic parameters and microbiological data of Micafungin were collected. Then we used MCS to calculate Probability of Target Attainment (PTA) and Cumulative Fraction of Response (CFR). With dosages of 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 4 mg/kg in oral group and dosages of 100
   
  mg, and 200
   
  mg in intravenous administration, all have different degree of antifungal effect. But when the dosage regimen was 50
   
  mg IV, the therapeutic effect of Micafungin against Candida spp. w
  as
   not good.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>PK/PD Model</kwd><kwd> Mote Carlo Simulation</kwd><kwd> Micafungin</kwd><kwd> Febrile Neutropenic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Neutropenia is the most common cause of death and morbidity in childhood cancer patients. Invasive fungal infections have significant morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients. It is found shortly after chemotherapy-induced neutropenia or hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). Among patients, about one-third of neutropenia episodes have a febrile reaction. When the absolute neutrophil count is less than 500 cells/L, the risk of serious bacterial or fungal infection increases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref1">1</xref>]. At present, Micafungin is one of the main drugs for the treatment of bacterial infections in children with neutropenia.</p><p>Micafungin is an echinocandin antifungal drug that selectively inhibits the synthesis of 1,3-β-D-glucan in the cell wall of fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref2">2</xref>]. At present, the invasive fungal infection in patients with neutropenia is Candida spp. and Micafungin has good antibacterial activity against the above-mentioned bacteria and is effective against azole-resistant Candida [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref3">3</xref>]. In addition, Micafungin slowly degrades through the catechol-o-methyltransferase pathway, has no inhibitory effect on cytochrome P450 enzymes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref4">4</xref>], and has become a common medicine for the treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia.</p><p>Mote Carlo Simulation (MCS) is an effective tool for dose screening in clinical treatment. It can evaluate the efficacy of antibacterial drugs, maximize the possibility of obtaining clinical efficacy, and minimize the possibility of antimicrobial resistance sex. This method has been used to analyze the suitability of the dosing regimen of Micafungin in critically ill patients with invasive fungal infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref5">5</xref>] and critically burned patients with abdominal cavity infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref6">6</xref>]. In this study, Monte Carlo simulation was used to optimize the dosing regimen of Micafungin in children with invasive Candida infection and febrile neutrophil deficiency, which provides a basis for clinical application.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Pharmacokinetic Parameters</title><p>Micafungin is a concentration-dependent antifungal drug, and its antibacterial effect is evaluated by the ratio AUC/MIC of Area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref7">7</xref>]. The calculation formula is:fAUC/MIC = (f &#215; dose)/(CL &#215; MIC), where Dose is the administered dose. In the formula, f = 1 − PBs represents the free drug fraction. The plasma protein binding rate for Micafungin is 99% representative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref8">8</xref>], so its f-value is 1%; and CL is drug clearance rate.</p><p>The pharmacokinetic parameters of Micafungin in children with febrile neutrophil deficiency are derived from the research literature of Seibel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref3">3</xref>], as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Microbial Information</title><p>MIC distributions of Micafungin against Candida spp.derived from EUCAST website (https://mic.eucast.org/search/, MIC distributions for Micafungin, 2021-10-20) (shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Monte Carlo Simulations</title><p>MCSs combine pharmacokinetic parameters and MIC distribution characteristics</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Pharmacokinetic parameters of Micafungin in children with febrile neutropenia</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Daily dose (mg/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. of patients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean wt (kg) &#177; SD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AUC<sub>0–∞ </sub> (h&#183;μg/ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t<sub>1/2</sub> (h)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CL (ml/h/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.6 &#177; 19.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9 &#177; 2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7 &#177; 2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.9 &#177; 32.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.4 &#177; 4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8 &#177; 2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7 &#177; 18.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.8 &#177; 16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4 &#177; 3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5 &#177; 11.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.8 &#177; 16.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8 &#177; 2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9 &#177; 13.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206.6 &#177; 23.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9 &#177; 1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.0 &#177; 11.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247.1 &#177; 23.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4 &#177; 2.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> MIC distributions of Micafungin against Candida spp</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Observations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.125</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. albicans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >940</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. glabrata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. guilliermondii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. krusei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >481</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. parapsilosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >743</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >332</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. tropicalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>to evaluate the probability of AUC/MIC pharmacodynamic target values in plasma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref10">10</xref>]. Use to obtain PK/PD parameters, conduct MCSs analysis on 10,000 simulated patients to obtain the PTA value of Probability of target attainment (PTA). The percentage of subjects which PTA reaches the target PK/PD value, PTA ≥ 90% is the best. The target Candida target value f AUC/MIC ≥ 10 is the best antifungal effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref11">11</xref>]. According to the MIC value distribution of Micafungin against Candida spp. published by EUCAST, calculate the expected probability of the corresponding strain to the target value, that is, the Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) value, and CFR ≥ 90% is considered to be the most effective treatment for empirical treatment which is the best choice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref10">10</xref>], its calculation formula is as follows:</p><p>C F R = ∑ i = 1 n P T A ( M I C i ) ⋅ i ( M I C ) i</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Calculation Software</title><p>Crystal Ball (Version 11.1.2.4.600, Oracle) was used for Monte Carlo simulation of drug administration schemes.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. PTA</title><p>PTA values of Micafungin under MIC distribution of the different Candida spp. infection in Febrile Neutropenic Pediatric Patients were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. In</p><p>Candida albicans, PTA was up to the standard for MIC ≤ 0.008 μg/mL, ≤0.016 μg/mL, ≤0.064 μg/ml, ≤0.032 μg/mL, ≤0.125 μg/mL and ≤0.125 μg/mL of dosage regimen included 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg respectively. In Candida glabrata, PTA was reached the standard for MIC ≤ 0.004 μg/ml, ≤0.016 μg/ml, ≤0.016 μg/ml, ≤0.032 μg/ml, ≤0.064 μg/ml and ≤0.125 μg/ml of dosage regimen included 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg respectively. In Candida guilliermondii, PTA of all MIC values did not meet the standards. When the administration scheme of C. krusei was 0.5 mg/kg, PTA of all MIC values did not meet the standards, and the rest reached the standards: 1 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg with MIC ≤ 0.016 μg/ml; 3 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg with MIC ≤ 0.032 μg/ml, ≤0.064 μg/ml respectively. In C. parapsilosis, the PTA &lt; 90% of all MIC values was dosage regimen of 0.5 mg/kg. And the rest reached the standards: 1 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg with MIC ≤ 0.016 μg/ml; 2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg with MIC ≤ 0.032 μg/ml, ≤ 0.064 μg/ml respectively. In C. tropicalis, the PTA &lt; 90% of all MIC values was dosage regimen of 0.5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg. And the rest reached the standards: 1.5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg with MIC ≤ 0.016 μg/ml; 3 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg with MIC ≤ 0.032 μg/ml, ≤0.064 μg/ml respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Cumulative Fraction of Response (CFR)</title><p>According to MCS analysis results, the CFR values of children who were neutropenia with fever treated with Micafungin under different administration regimens were obtained (shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The results showed that Micafungin had poor antibacterial effect on C. guilliermondii,C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and CFR of C. guilliermondii, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis 4 mg/kg of Micafungin less than 90%. CFR of C. albicans and C. glabrata excluding with the dosage of Micafungin 1 mg/kg more than 90%. CFR of C. tropicalis at 3 to 4 mg/kg administration of Micafungin more than 90%.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Invasive fungal infections are the leading cause of death in children with neutropenia, with a high mortality rate for severe infections despite the introduction of antifungal agents in treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref1">1</xref>]. Micafennet is currently the preferred drug for the treatment of Candida infection. ANDES et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref12">12</xref>] showed that micafennet had good antibacterial effect when f AUC/MIC approached 10. Lepak et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref11">11</xref>] showed that micafennet had good antifungal effect on Candida when f AUC/MIC was ≥10. Therefore, our study set as that the target Candida spp. target value f AUC/MIC ≥ 10 is the best antifungal effect. According to PK/PD parameters of micafennet in children with neutropenia, MCS was used to analyze whether different administration regimens of micafennet could reach the target value, so as to make the antifungal treatment of patients more reasonable.</p><p>Micafengin was initially administered at different doses for different Candida species, with a recommended dose of 0.5 - 4 mg/kg for children with neutropenia.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> CFR expectation values (%) against six species of Candida spp. for Micafungin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >dosage regimen (mg/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. albicans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. glabrata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. guilliermondii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. krusei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. parapsilosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. tropicalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.73</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Our study showed that when micafengin administration regimen was 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg, The infection caused by C. guilliermondii, C. krusei, C. Parapsilosis is not effective, The optimal dosing regimen for C. albicans and C. glabrata and C. tropicalis is 1 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 3 mg/kg, respectively, and the results were similar to the recommended dosing regimen for micafennet for invasive Candida infection in children that has been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.120042-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Considering the imperfection of immune function in children and the immature development of liver and kidney organs, the drug should not be used empirically according to the adult dose. MCSs is a random sampling analysis method, which simulates tens of thousands of times according to the pharmacological process of drugs in different patients and fully considers the difference in drug sensitivity of different strains of the same pathogen, so as to calculate PTA and CFR values and evaluate the rationality of drug administration plan. However, this study still has some limitations. Due to the lack of grouping studies of children in different age groups, relevant PK data cannot be obtained, so patients cannot be evaluated according to specific age. In summary, micafennet has been recognized for the prevention and treatment of invasive Candida infections in infants and children. In the treatment of invasive fungal infection in children with neutropenia, micafennet should be fully considered to adjust the administration regimen. The results of this study showed that, for infection caused by C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. tropicalis, the optimal administration regimen was 1 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 3 mg/kg, respectively. For C. guilliermondii, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis infection when the antifungal effect is not good, it is recommended to adjust other drugs or combined drugs.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, the results of PK/PD modelling and Monte Carlo simulations suggest that Micafungin has significant effects on C. albicans and C. glabrata, C. tropicalis in children with febrile neutropenic. The optimal administration regimen was 1 mg/kg, 1mg/kg and 3 mg/kg. In the case of infection caused by C. guilliermondii, C. krusei and C. parapsilosis, Micafungin has a poor antifungal effect, and then it is suggested to adjust other drugs or combine with other antifungal drugs.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by the Study and Development Fund for Sciences and Technology in Chengde City (No. 202006A072) and the Hospital Pharmacy scientific research project of the Hebei Pharmaceutical Society (No. 2020-Hbsyxhqn0030).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hu, J.L., Wang, Y., Hu, J.H., Yu, X.L. and Zhu, X.Q. (2022) Based on PK/PD and Monte Carlo Simulation Analysis of the Dosing Regimens of Micafungin in Children with Febrile Neutropenic. Open Journal of Pediatrics, 12, 711-717. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojped.2022.124072</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.120042-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dilek, G.G. and Sibel, A.T. (2018,) Granulocyte Transfusions in the Management of Neutropenic Fever: Apediatric Perspective. Transfusion and Apheresis Science, 57, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2018.02.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carver, P.L. (2004) Micafungin. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 38, 1707-1721.  
https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1D301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seibel, N.L., Schwartz, C., Arrieta, A., et al. (2005) Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in Febrile Neutropenic Pediatric Patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 49, 3317-3324.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.8.3317-3324.2005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yanni, S.B., Augustijns, P.F., Benjamin Jr., D.K., et al. (2010) In Vitro Investigation of the Hepatobiliary Disposition Mechanisms of the Antifungal Agent Micafungin in Humans and Rats. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 38, 1848-1856.  
https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.110.033811</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boonstra, J.M., Van Der Elst, K.C., Veringa, A., et al. (2017) Pharmacokinetic Properties of Micafungin in Critically Ill Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Candidiasis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 61, e01398-17.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01398-17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García-De-Lorenzo, A., Luque, S., Grau, S., et al. (2016) Comparative Population Plasma and Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Micafungin in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Burn Injuries and Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 60, 5914-5921.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00727-16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joseph, J.M., Jain, R. and Danziger, L.H. (2007) Micafungin: A New Echinocandin Antifungal. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 27, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.27.1.53</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Micafungin in Drugbank. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mouton, J.W., Dudley, M.N., Cars, O., Derendorf, H. and Drusano, G.L. (2002) Standardization of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) Terminology for Anti-Infective Drugs. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 19, 355-358.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(02)00031-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, X.Q., Xu, G.Q., Chen, L., et al. (2020) Assessment of Micafungin Loading Dosage Regimens against Candida spp. in ICU Patients by Monte Carlo Simulations. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 76, 695-702.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02840-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lepak, A.J. and Andes, D.R. (2015) Antifungal Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 5, a019653.  
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019653</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andes, D.R., Diekema, D.J., Pfaller, M.A., et al. (2008) In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Target Investigation for Micafungin against Candida albicans and C. glabrata in a Neutropenic Murine Candidiasis Model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 52, 3497-3503. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019653</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.120042-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, G.Q., Zhu, L.Q., Ge, T.Y., et al. (2016) Optimal Micafungin Dosage Regimens in Pediatric Patients with Invasive Candida Infection. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 35, 482-486.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>