<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJPathology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Pathology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-6775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojpathology.2022.124017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJPathology-119938</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in C&#244;te d’Ivoire: Epidemiological, Clinical and Pathological Aspects
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’Dah</surname><given-names>Kouame Justin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tia</surname><given-names>Weu Melanie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Akpro</surname><given-names>Sedy Louess De Randorphe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lagou</surname><given-names>Delphine Amélie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Toure</surname><given-names>Ibrahiman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kobenan</surname><given-names>Atta Anne Rebecca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abouna</surname><given-names>Alain Didier</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guei</surname><given-names>Monley Cyr</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tuo</surname><given-names>Wonko-Tian Alice</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oka</surname><given-names>Kouamé Hubert</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diopo</surname><given-names>Sery Patrick Olivier</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Delma</surname><given-names>Samuel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cherif</surname><given-names>Ibrahima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Traore</surname><given-names>Moussa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amekoudi</surname><given-names>Eyram</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"><sup>8</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouattara</surname><given-names>Belarsi Safiatou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Kouame Hubert</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ackoundou</surname><given-names>Nguessan Clément</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adonis</surname><given-names>Koffi Laurence</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Gnangoran Victor</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gnionsahie</surname><given-names>Dazé Apolinaire</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohenou</surname><given-names>Isidore Jean-Marie Diomandé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Teaching Hospital of Bouake, Bouake, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Department of Nephrology, University Teaching Hospital of Blaise Compaore, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Nephrology, University Teaching Hospital of Treichville, Abidjan, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Teaching Hospital of Donka, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Nephrology, University Teaching Hospital of Yopougon, Abidjan, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Teaching Hospital of Cocody, Abidjan, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff8"><addr-line>Department of Nephrology, University Teaching Hospital of Sylvanus Olympio, Lome, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Nephrology, University Teaching Hospital of Bouake, Bouake, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>146</fpage><lpage>155</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is characterized histologically by hyalinosis and sclerosis of glomeruli associated or not with podocyte involvement. The objective of our work was to clarify the epidemiological aspects and histological variants of FSGS in C
  &amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. 
  Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive retrospective study, conducted from January 2015 to December 2019 using the renal biopsy registers (RB) of the Pathological Anatomy and Cytology departments of the Teaching Hospital of Cocody and Bouake in collaboration with the Nephrology Services of C
  &amp;#244;te d'Ivoire and the sub-region. The biopsies underwent conventional histopathology and/or immunofluorescence techniques. The parameters analyzed were: frequency, age, gender, proteinuria, biopsy indications and histological aspects and the different correlations between histological aspects and socio-demographic characteristics. 
  Results: FSGS represented 58.1% (n = 104) of glomerular nephropathies. The average age of patients was 32.1 &#177; 13.3 years, with extremes of 13 and 70 years. The sex ratio was equal to 1. Nephrotic syndrome (68.9%), chronic renal failure (14.3%) and acute renal failure (10.1%) were the main indications for renal biopsy (RB). The mean proteinuria at the time of diagnosis was 4 &#177; 3.7 g/24 h. It was massive (3.5 g/24 h) in 42.3% of patients. FSGS was primary in 29.8% (n = 31) and secondary in 70.2% (n = 73) of patients, of which 27.9% (n = 35) was due to HIV. According to the Columbia classification, 62.5% NOS type was found; 23.1% collapsing type; 7.7% tip lesion type; 4.8% cell type and 1.9% perihilary type. 
  Conclusion: FSGS is a complex heterogeneous entity. It affects young people in our context with a homogeneous gender distribution. Understanding its histogenesis is essential for optimal patient management.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Kidney</kwd><kwd> Glomerulus</kwd><kwd> Histology</kwd><kwd> FSGS</kwd><kwd> C&#244;te d’Ivoire</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is one of the leading causes of kidney failure worldwide. It is histologically characterized by hyalinosis and sclerosis of the glomeruli reaching only one sector of the glomerulus (segmental involvement) and/or only a certain percentage of the glomeruli (focal involvement); associated or not with podocyte involvement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref2">2</xref>]. The segmental lesion results in collapse of the glomerular basal membrane with a characteristic synechia between the parietal epithelium and the Bowman capsule [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref1">1</xref>]. Podocyte involvement is characterized by hypertrophy with erasure of the pedicels and sometimes severe involvement with ultrastructural abnormalities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref3">3</xref>]. It is manifested by a very often severe nephrotic syndrome, greater resistance to treatment with corticosteroids and faster progression to end-stage renal failure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref1">1</xref>]. FSGS is one of the main causes of nephrotic syndrome, accounting for 40% of cases in adults and 20% in children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref4">4</xref>]. Initially, FSGS was classified as primitive (idiopathic) or secondary, and this distinction had therapeutic and prognostic implications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref3">3</xref>]. Since 2004, the Columbia classification describes five histological variants: perihilar, vascular pole (tip lesion), cellular, collapsing and NOS (non-specific) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref5">5</xref>]. Accurate data on the incidence and prevalence of FSGS are difficult to obtain due to significant racial and geographic differences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref4">4</xref>]. The increased incidence of FSGS was objectified in studies in North America and Europe. In Africa, the overall prevalence of FSGS is highly variable with no significant difference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref6">6</xref>]. In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, renal biopsy is practically at a beginning stage, the pathological aspects of this pathological entity are unknown. To better understand the prevalence and histopathological characteristics of hyalinosis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>It was a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study carried out in the Department of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology (PAC) of the Teaching Hospital of Cocody and Bouake in collaboration with the departments of Nephrology and Pediatric Nephrology of Abidjan and Bouak&#233; as well as those of the Teaching Hospital of Sylvanus Olympio (Togo), the Danka Hospital (Guinea Conakry), the TAMBA Clinic (Togo) and the Nura Clinic (Ouagadougou). Data were collected from January 2015 to December 2019 from the kidney biopsy registry. Two biopsy fragments were performed and routed separately. One was fixed in a vial containing Alcohol-Formalin-Acetic Acid (AFA), for study in optical microscopy (paraffin inclusion, microtome cut and haematoxylin eosin stain, Masson trichrome, Schiff’s periodic acid and Jones’ silver plating.). The other fragment was placed in a compress soaked in physiological serum and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen at −176˚C or fixed in liquid honey or Michel’s liquid for direct immunofluorescence study. Serial sections of 5 microns were made with cryostat and spread on desylannised slides. Incubation of the slices was done using Dako’s antihuman Rabbit polyclonal antibodies, directed against immunoglobulin chains (IgG, IgA, IgM), complement fractions (C3, C1q), heavy chains (α, &#181;, γ) and light chains (κ and λ), and fibrinogen. The observation was made with a fluorescence microscope equipped with a source of UV radiation and excitation filters. A dark room was used to avoid neutralization of Ag-Ac reactions by UV rays of natural light. The fluorescence was observed and classified according to the intensity of staining from 0 to 3. Included in the study were all patients with histologically diagnosed FSGS from renal biopsy with at least three non-sclerosed glomeruli with or without renal biopsy immunofluorescence. The parameters studied were epidemiological (frequency, age, gender, country of origin, occupation, history) clinico-biological (indications, proteinuria and RB techniques) and histopathological (RB topography, elementary lesions and histological variants, and immunofluorescence data). The data was entered from the Microsoft Excel software of Windows 10 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and analysed in Epi-info 7.2. Chi-square and variance analysis were used to study the correlations of histological variants with the parameters studied. The results were considered statistically significant for a probability value p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Socio-Demographic Data</title><p>Of the 179 renal biopsy cases examined over the study period, 104 patients had Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). This entity represented 58.1% of renal biopsies and 59.4% of glomerular nephropathy. The annual frequency was 20.8 cases/year. Samples were taken from C&#244;te d’Ivoire (84.6%), Togo (6.7%), Burkina Faso (4.8%) and Guinea-Conakry (3.9%). Patients had an average age of 32.1 &#177; 13.3 years (13 and 70 years). Children under the age of 15 accounted for 6.8% (n = 6) and 2.9% of subjects were over the age of 60. There were as many men as women (sex-ratio = 1).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Clinico-Biological Characteristics</title><p>The indications of biopsy in our work were: nephrotic syndrome in 65.5% of patients (n = 78), followed by renal failure in 24.4% of patients (n = 29), rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) in 5% of patients (N = 6), hematuria in 3.4% of cases (N = 4) and nephritic syndrome in 1.7% of patients (N = 2). The mean proteinuria at the time of diagnosis was 4 &#177; 3.7 g/24 h with extremes of 0.2 g/24 h and 21.6 g/24 h. Proteinuria was nephrotic amplitude (≥3 g/24 h) in 50% of patients (N = 52).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Types of Variants and Correlations</title><p>The incidence of the NOS variant was 62.5% of the cases (N = 65) followed by the collapsing variant (26%), tubular pole (tip lesion) (5.8%) and hypercellular and perihilar variant with respectively 3.8% and 1.9%. Histological variants are represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The statistical relationships between gender (p = 0.88) and different age groups (&lt;15 years, p = 0.74; [16 - 59 years], p = 0.63; ≥60 years, p = 0.17) and histological variants were not significant. Nephrotic syndrome was most observed in NOS (80%), Tip (83.3%), and cellular (75%) variants compared to collapsing (59%) and perihilar (50%) variants. Renal failure was found in the cellular variants (50%), collapsing (44.4%) and Tip lesion (33.3%). No significant association was found between histological variants and biopsy indications rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (p = 0.29); hematuria (p = 0.34); nephritic syndrome (p = 0.68). However, there was a significant association with nephrotic syndrome (p = 0.02) and kidney failure (p = 0.03).</p><p>The main indications of renal biopsies were nephrotic syndrome (65.5%), followed by renal failure (27.9%), rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) (5%), hematuria (3.4%) and nephritis syndrome in 1.7% of patients. Nephrotic syndrome was more common in NOS variants (80%), followed by Tip (83.3%),</p><p>and cellular (75%) compared to collapsing (59%) and perihilar (50%) variants. Renal failure was found in the cellular variants (50%), collapsing (44.4%) and Tip lesion (33.3%). Mean proteinuria was estimated at 4 &#177; 3.7 g/24 h with extremes of 0.2 g/24 h and 21.6 g/24 h. Proteinuria was nephrotic (≥3 g/24 h) in 50% (n = 52) of patients. No significant association was found between histological variants and biopsy indications (rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (p = 0.29); hematuria (p = 0.34); nephritic syndrome (p = 0.68). However, nephrotic syndrome (p = 0.02) was associated with renal failure (p = 0.03).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Characteristics between Histological Variants and Elementary Lesions</title><p>The mean number of glomeruli per biopsy was 21.5 &#177; 17.3 and a median of 16.5 (extreme: 2 and 105). Glomerular sclerosis was found in 20.9% of cases and 79.1% of glomeruli were permeable. Interstitial fibrosis was present in 72.1%. Tubular atrophy accounted for 57.7% of cases. Fibrosis was moderate to severe in 21.1% (N = 21) and minimal in 51% (N = 53). However, 27.9% of patients (N = 29) had no interstitial fibrosis. A statistically significant association was found between histological variants and sclerosed glomeruli (p = 0.01) interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.01) and tubular atrophy (p = 0.01).</p><p>Among FSGS patients, 29.8% (N = 31) had primary FSGS and a secondary cause was identified in 70.2% (N = 73) of patients, of which 27.9% (N = 29) had HIV followed by genetic, hemodynamic and toxic causes in 18.3%, 16.3% and 7.7% of patients respectively. At immunofluorescence a mesangial deposition of IgM and C3 together was noted in 7.9% (N = 5) of cases, that of IgM, IgG and C3 together represents 4.8% (N = 3). However, isolated entrapment of IgM, IgA and IgG was observed in 20.6% (N = 13), 19.1% (N = 12) and 17.5% (N = 11) of subjects, respectively. It was associated with an isolated deposit of C3 (28.6%, N = 18) and C1q (4.8%, N = 3) and a deposit of the light chains Kappa and Lambda in respectively 4.8% (N = 3) and 1.6% (N = 1). Biopsy immunofluorescence showed no statistically significant differences with histological variants.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This study examined the clinical and histopathological characteristics of the histological variants of 104 patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). This entity represents 58.1% of kidney biopsies. The work carried out by different authors around the world suggests a large variability in the proportion of FSGS from 2.5% to 57% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref8">8</xref>]. In Africa, although Lemrabott et al. had a relatively high prevalence (48.7%), the majority of authors reported prevalence as variable as in other regions of the world (0.7% to 51.9%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref9">9</xref>]. The average age of the patients in our study is 32.1 &#177; 13.3 years. This is similar to Lemrabott and al (33.3 years). However, it is lower than the data for Ghali et al. (36.3 years) and Stokes (37.7 years). In contrast, Arias and al, as well as Swarnalatha and al, had relatively younger subjects aged 26 and 24.3 years respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref12">12</xref>]. There was no gender predominance in this series (sex-ratio = 1). Our data disagree with many studies that were either male-dominated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref13">13</xref>] or female-dominated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref6">6</xref>]. The NOS variant is the most represented with 62.5% of cases. The proportion of other variants is relatively highly variable with low levels of FSGS Cellular-type (FSGS-CELL) and FSGS Perihilary-type (FSGS-PH) in 3.8% and 1.9% of patients, respectively. This trend was somewhat similar to that of some studies that objected to a predominance of FSGS-NOS with prevalences ranging from 38.7% to 89.1%; (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> presents the comparative prevalence of variants in different population series) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref14">14</xref>] and a prevalence of FSGS-CELL ranging from 0.7% to 3% and FSGS-PH ranging from 0% to 4.8% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref14">14</xref>]. It is possible that this variability and difference in variants may be related to population characteristics or environmental factors. It should be noted that the other four variants may evolve into the NOS variant during the progression of disease and increasing chronicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref11">11</xref>]. In this study, the average age of patients with different FSGS variants is substantially the same (29.5 - 34.3 years). However, FSGS-PH subjects are younger with an average age of 20.5 years. The results of this series differ from those of Das and al and Swarnalatha and al which objectify a predominance of FSGS-NOS in young subjects and a high frequency of Collapsing-FSGS in the adult population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>The indications of biopsy are preferentially nephrotic syndrome in 65.5% of patients followed by renal failure in 27.9% of patients, and hematuria in 3.4% of patients. These results are consistent with literature data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref9">9</xref>]. The NOS, Tip, and cellular variants share common clinical features with nephrotic syndrome and hematuria more common than in collapsing and perihilar variants. Jeroen and al objectified a higher frequency of nephrotic syndrome in the Collapsing, Tip, and Cellular variants with lower frequencies in the Perihilary and NOS variants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref5">5</xref>]. The average proteinuria in our study is 4 &#177; 3.7 g/24 h. Ghali et al. noted average proteinuria of 5.67 +/- 4.5 g/24 h. In this series, proteinuria is of nephrotic amplitude (≥3 g/24 h) in 50% of patients and it was in all variants of FSGS with the exception of the Cellular variant. This observation corroborates that of many series, with mean proteinuria of nephrotic amplitudes in all variants of FSGS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref13">13</xref>]. In contrast, Arias reported moderate non-nephrotic proteinuria in the</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of histological types according to sex</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Histological Variant of FSGS</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Our study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stokes MB (2014)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Swarnalatha G (2015)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arias LF (2013)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shakeel S (2014)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D’Agati (2011)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Collapsing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tip lesion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cellular</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perihilar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>perihilar variant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref11">11</xref>]. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> summarizes the distribution of epidemiological and clinical data according to the histological variants. The average number of glomeruli per biopsy is 21.5 &#177; 17.3 with a median of 16.5. This data agrees with that of Arias and al (16.7 &#177; 12.9; median: 14) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref11">11</xref>]. Glomerular sclerosis is found in 20.9% of the included glomeruli and 79.1% of the glomeruli were permeable. The proportion of sclerotic glomerulus in our study is higher than that of Swarnalatha and al (17.2%), but remains much lower than the rate of glomerular sclerosis detected in the series of Das and al (54.1%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref13">13</xref>]. The sclerosis is more severe in the perihilar variant, intermediate in the NOS and Collapsing variants and less severe in the lesion and cellular variants. As in our study, Joroen and et al. noted severe sclerosis in the perihilar variant, intermediate in the NOS variants and less severe in the Tip lesion variant. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were common in our study with proportions of 72.1% and 57.7%, respectively. These results are consistent with those of Das and al who found high frequencies of fibrosis and tubular atrophy in 87.7% and 90.7% respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref13">13</xref>]. Fibrosis is moderate to severe in 21.1% (N = 21) and Minimal in 51% of cases (N = 53). However, no interstitial fibrosis was objectified in 27.9% of patients (N = 29). Shakeel and al reported moderate to severe interstitial fibrosis in 14.4% of patients but 16% of these patients had no fibrosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref14">14</xref>]. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the distribution of histopathological data according to FSGS variants.</p><p>The proportion of idiopathic FSGS found in our study is 29.8%; despite its predominance as etiology of FSGS, it remains below the Eljouehari and et al.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of epidemic-clinical data according to histological variants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="3"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >FSGS-TOTAL</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >NOS</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Collapsing</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Tip</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cellular</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average age</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >32.1 &#177; 17.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >31.6 &#177; 23.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.3 &#177; 12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >29.5 &#177; 14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.5 &#177; 13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.5 &#177; 6.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >GENDER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >≤15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >[16 - 59]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >≥60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average proteinuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4 &#177; 3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.7 &#177; 2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.6 &#177; 4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.5 &#177; 7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.8 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.5 &#177; 2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Proteinuria ≥3 g/24 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Nephrotic syndrome</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Renal failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >RPGN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Haematuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Nephritic syndrome</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of histopathological data according to the variants of FSGS</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >FSGS-TOTAL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NOS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Collapsing</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tip</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cellular</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerulus average number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5 &#177; 17.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7 &#177; 18.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5 &#177; 15.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2 &#177; 7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7 &#177; 2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 &#177; 19.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sclerotic glomerulus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interstitial fibrosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tubular atrophy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>data which noted 35% of idiopathic FSGS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref15">15</xref>]. Primary FSGS is a distinct entity and paradoxically is better defined at present as an exclusion diagnosis after the elimination of any other cause of secondary FSGS. It has long been attributed to a presumed factor of permeability to circulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref17">17</xref>]. Recent data suggest that FSGS associated with APOL1 may be another form of primary FSGS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref17">17</xref>]. Among the secondary causes identified human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reached 27.9% of FSGS (39.7% of secondary FSGS) followed by genetic, hemodynamic and toxic causes in 18.3%, 16.3% and 7.7% of cases, respectively. Viruses can act on the podocyte either by direct infection or by the release of inflammatory cytokines that interact with podocyte receptors. HIV-1 directly infects podocytes and tubular epithelial cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref18">18</xref>]. Other viral etiologies may exist but are infrequent, the case of cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>The genetic FSGS was associated with mutations in more than 20 genes coding for a range of molecules that appear critical for podocyte function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref17">17</xref>]. For hemodynamic or adaptive FSGS, it would result from a mismatch between the glomerular blood flow and the glomerular filtration surface, resulting in stress, detachment and podocyte loss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref20">20</xref>]. Drug-induced FSGS is associated with a short list of drugs, including those that act on the podocyte (pamidronate, interferon alpha) and those that damage the tubulo-interstitium (lithium, cyclosporine and tenofovir) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Immunofluorescence examination of biopsies was performed in 61% (N = 63) of patients and showed mesangial deposition of IgM and C3 together in 7.9% of cases, IgM, IgG and C3 together represent 4.8% however, isolated entrapment of IgM, IgA and IgG were observed in respectively 20.6%, 19.1% and 17.5% associated with an isolated deposit of C3 (28.6%) and C1q (4.8%) and a deposit of light chains (Kappa and Lambda) in respectively 4.8% and 1.6%. Compared to our results Shakeel found 41.1% IgM, 13% C3 with IgA and negative IgG [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119938-ref14">14</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>FSGS is a complex heterogeneous entity. It affects young subjects in our context with a homogeneous gender distribution. Understanding its histogenesis is essential for optimal patient management. Because of the diagnostic difficulties in our region, it would be necessary to establish a subsidy policy for biological balance sheets, essential for the performance of the biopsy, but also for the histological diagnosis.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Justin, N.D.K., Melanie, T.W., De Randorphe, A.S.L., Am&#233;lie, L.D., Ibrahiman, T., Rebecca, K.A.A., Didier, A.A., Cyr, G.M., Alice, T.W.-T., Hubert, O.K., Olivier, D.S.P., Samuel, D., Ibrahima, C., Moussa, T., Eyram, A., Safiatou, O.B., Hubert, Y.K., Cl&#233;ment, A.N., Laurence, A.K., Victor, Y.G., Apolinaire, G.D. and Jean-Marie, D.M.I. (2022) Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in C&#244;te d’Ivoire: Epidemiological, Clinical and Pathological Aspects. Open Journal of Pathology, 12, 146-155. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpathology.2022.124017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119938-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kriz, W., Lemley, K.V., Kriz, W. and Lemley, K.V. (2017) Défis mécaniques de la barrière de filtration glomérulaire: adaptations et voie vers la sclérose en plaques. Pediatric Nephrology, 32, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3358-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grèze, C., Garrouste, C., Kemeny, J.L., Philipponnet, C., Aniort, J. and Heng, A.&amp;#201;. (2018) Hyalinose segmentaire et focale collapsante secondaire au cytomégalovirus: à propos d’un cas. Néphrologie &amp; Thérapeutique, 14, 50-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2017.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruggeman, L.A., Ross, M.D., Tanji, N., Cara, A., Dikman, S., Gordon, R.E., et al. (2000) Renal Epithelium is a Previously Unrecognized Site of HIV-1 Infection. American Society of Nephrology, 11, 2079-2087. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.V11112079</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenberg, A.Z. and Kopp, J.B. (2017) Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 12, 502-517. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05960616</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fogo, A.B. (2015) Causes and Pathogenesis of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 11, 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2014.216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eljouehari, M., Flayou, K., Raoundi, O., Benamar, L., Rhou, H., Bayahia, R., et al. (2015) Profil anatomopathologique et évolutif de la hyalinose segmentaire et focale primitive idiopathique. Néphrologie &amp; Thérapeutique, 11, Article No. 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2015.07.352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shakeel, S., Mubarak, M. and Kazi, J.I. (2014) Frequency and Clinicopathological correlations of Histopathological Variants of Idiopathic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Nephrotic Adolescents. Indian Journal of Nephrology, 24, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.132003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, P., Sharma, A., Gupta, R., Agarwal, S.K., et al. (2012) Histomorphological Classification of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Critical Evaluation of Clinical, Histologic and Morphometric Features. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, 23, Article No. 1008. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.100883</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swarnalatha, G., Ram, R., Ismal, K.M., Vali, S., Sahay, M., et al. (2015) Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Does Prognosis Vary with the Variants? Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, 26, Article No. 173. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.148772</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arias, L.F., Jiménez, C.A. and Arroyave, M.J. (2013) Histologic Variants of Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Presentation and Outcome. Brazilian Journal of Nephrology, 35, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.5935/0101-2800.20130019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghali, M., Aloui, S., Letaief, A., Hamouda, M., Skhiri, H., Frih, A., et al. (2015) A Multicenter Study on Profile of Hypertension in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Tunisia. Annales de Cardiologie et d’Angéiologie, 64, 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancard.2015.04.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lemrabott, A., Keita, I.A., Faye, M., Fall, K., Cissé, M.M., Mbengue, M., et al. (2018) Hypertension artérielle secondaire aux glomérulopathies chroniques primitives a Sénégal. Néphrologie &amp; Thérapeutique, 14, Article No. 345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2018.07.215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaba, M.L., Tolno, A., Bah, M.O., Diakité, F., Bah, A.O., Kourouma, M.L., et al. (2016) Lésions histologiques rénales au cours du syndrome néphrotique pur de L’adulte à Conakry. Mali Médical, 31, 1-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gargade, C.B., Khandekar, M.M. and Patil, S.N. (2016) Histomorphologic Analysis in Adult Nephrotic Syndrome: Changing Scenario. Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University, 9, Article No. 348. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.182506</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okpechi, I.G., Ameh, O.I., Bello, A.K., Ronco, P., Swanepoel, C.R., et al. (2016) Epidemiology of Histologically Proven Glomerulonephritis in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 11, e0152203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stokes, M.B. and D’Agati, V.D. (2014) Morphologic Variants of Focal Egmental Glomerulosclerosis and Their Significance. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 21, 400-407. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2014.02.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sim, J.J., Batech, M., Hever, A., Harrison, T.N., Avelar, T., Kanter, M.H., et al. (2016) Distribution of Biopsy-Proven Presumed Primary Glomerulonephropathies in 2000-2011 among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse US Population. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 68, 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D’Agati, V.D., Kaskel, F.J. and Falk, R.J. (2011) Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 2398-2411. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1106556</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Han, M.-H. and Kim, Y.-J. (2016) Practical Application of Columbia Classification for Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. BioMed Research International, 2016, Article ID: 9375753. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9375753</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119938-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jotterand, V., Moll, S., Martin, P.Y. and Saudan, P. (2008) Bisphosphonate-Induced Collapsing Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis; Two Clinical Cases and Literature Review. Néphrologie &amp; Thérapeutique, 5, 134-138.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>