<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of AIDS</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8814</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wja.2022.123011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJA-119919</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  HIV/AIDs Risk Perception and Sexual Behavior among Commercial Female Sex Worker in Thailand
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Phrutthinun</surname><given-names>Surit</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sukkid</surname><given-names>Yasothornsrikul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ratchanee</surname><given-names>Mitkitti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Facuty of Medical Science and Centre of Excellence in Medical Biotechnology (CEMB), Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Nursing, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiangrai, Thailand</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>155</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Commercial female sex workers (CFSWs) are considered a high-risk group for HIV/AIDs. The prevalence of HIV/AIDs trends to increase among those groups also in Thailand. An adequate perception of the degree to which one is at risk of having HIV is necessary for behavioral change and of safe behaviors. HIV/AIDs risk perception among CFSWs was needed to reduce HIV/AIDs infection. 
  Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 141 CFSWs in Bangkok, Thailand. Participants were selected using convenient and purposive sampling methods for January to October 2019. Self-access questionnaire was used for collecting data with the reliability testing of 0.82. Logistic regression employed to identify adjusted odd ratio between demographic data, sexual behaviors and HIV/AIDs risk perception, p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 
  Results: 51.77% of CFSWs perceived themselves at high risk for HIV/AIDs infection. Most CFSWs reported that they did not consistently use condom (57.45%), factors associated with perception risk of HIV/AIDs including education level (adjusted OR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.07 - 4.54), knowledge of HIV and STDs (adjusted OR = 3.65 and 3.22. 95% CI = 1.89 - 3.91), Condom use (adjusted OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.05 - 2.90) years engaged in sex work, age of initiating in sex work, frequency of sex work in the last month and unplanned sex work were significant with risk perception of HIV/AIDs (adjusted OR = 3.33, 2.71, 2.67, 2.56 and 95% CI = 1.99 - 3.84, 1.72 - 3.32, 1.29 - 3.12, 1.05 - 2.78 respectively), and had HIV/STDs test (adjusted OR = 3.22, 95% CI = 2.11 - 3.95). Other used illicit drugs by injection, smoking and alcohol consumption had a strong association with the high perception of HIV/AIDs among CFSWs.
   Conclusion: Majority of CFSWs with risky sexual behaviors had a high HIV/AIDs risk perception. Effective educational programmes are necessary to enable CFSWs to correctly assess their own HIV/AIDs risk and change risk behaviors based on self-assessment of actual risk.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Commercial Female Sex Workers</kwd><kwd> HIV/AIDs</kwd><kwd> Prevalence</kwd><kwd> Sexually Transmitted Infection</kwd><kwd> Epidemiology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The high epidemic of HIV/AIDS and Sexual Transmitted Diseases (STDs) is the world serious public health and social problem. In the past decade, Thailand has experienced a rapid increase in HIV/AIDS cases; the number of Thai people living with HIV has continued to raise despite the availability of effective prevention strategies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref2">2</xref>]. Thailand became the first country in Asia to launch the 100% Condom Use Programme (CUP), which a collaborative effort among local authorities, public health officers, sex establishment owners, and sex workers. The objective of the programme was to ensure that clients could not purchase sexual services without condom use. As a result, HIV prevalence declined, the adult HIV prevalence was estimated to be 1.4% in 2007 and 610,000 adults and children were estimated to be living with HIV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref4">4</xref>]. In the early 1990s, about 80% of new infections were among female sex workers (FSWs) and their clients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref5">5</xref>]. The success of the 100% CUP resulted in the reduction in the proportion of annual new infections in sex work settings from 80% to 15%. As of 2008, it was estimated that 4% and 10% of new infections were among FSWs and their clients, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref6">6</xref>]. According to the report on sentinel surveillance of HIV infection in the seven major target groups of population in Thailand, implemented in all provinces during the period 1989-2009, included were blood donors, pregnant woman, injection drug users, male clients attending STIs clinic, direct female commercial sex-workers (FCSWs), indirect FCSWs and military recruits or conscripts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref7">7</xref>]. National HIV prevalence decreased from 27% to 5% among FCSWs in brothels and from 10% to 3% in non-brothel sex establishments during the same time. Although the HIV epidemic is declining in a recent year, certain groups have much higher rates of HIV compared to the general population, those most affected are men who have sex with men (MSM), male and female commercial sex workers, transgender people and people who injected drugs. Spouses of these populations and people living with HIV, migrant workers and prisoners are also more vulnerable to HIV than others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>In Thailand, HIV prevalence is far greater among sex workers. In 2014, of the estimated 141,769 sex workers in Thailand, HIV prevalence was approximately 12% among male sex workers (MSWs) and 2% among FCSWs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref4">4</xref>]. However, urban settings have shown to yield exceptionally high HIV prevalence among FCSWs, such as 20% in Bangkok and also high in big cities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref5">5</xref>]. Results from the sentinel surveillance system have been remarkable: between 1997 and 2007, national HIV prevalence decreased from 27% to 5% among CFSW in brothels and from 10% to 3% in non-brothel sex establishments during the same period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref8">8</xref>]. The number of direct FSWs working at brothels, teahouses, hotels, and on the street substantially decreased in Thailand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref9">9</xref>]. Instead, the number of indirect FSWs working at massage parlors, bars/clubs, and restaurants and online CFSWs has been increasing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref11">11</xref>]. The trend from direct to indirect sex work is problematic for HIV prevention efforts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref9">9</xref>], especially online CFSWs because it is difficult to identify and outreach to indirect CFSWs, and commercial sex activities often occur outside establishments, except for massage parlors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref14">14</xref>]. Beside this, the risk of HIV and STDs will be dramatically high in the future.</p><p>Commercial Female sex workers are women who have been professionally involved in sex for money or any gifts for their source of income [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref15">15</xref>]. Due to their involvement, CFSWs are considered highly responsible for transmitting HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) from high-risk to low-risk population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref16">16</xref>]. Globally, the prevalence of FSWs remains high and varies by geographical regions. It was found that the estimated prevalence of HIV infection among FSWs was 0.3% in the Middle East and North Africa and 29.3% in the sub-Saharan region, while in the developed countries it was about 1.8% of the total female population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref17">17</xref>] and approximately 2.0% in Thailand, while condom use with clients among female sex workers about 27% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>Therefore, CFSWs working in night clubs/bars and spa/saunas remain at high risk of becoming exposed to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref2">2</xref>]. Approximately 40% of FSWs worldwide have entered the sex trade before the age of 18 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref5">5</xref>]. Adolescent female sex workers are especially at higher risk for HIV/STI infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref6">6</xref>] because their genital tracts are not fully developed and the previous study show high risk of HIV infection among this group for example, two studies on FSWs in Thailand found that adolescent FSWs reported less condom negotiation and condom use and more anal sex compared to older FSWs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref12">12</xref>]. In Vietnam, a study showed how adolescent sex workers reported using condoms less frequently [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref13">13</xref>]. In addition to engaging in higher-risk behaviors on a more frequent basis, younger sex workers in South Asia had a greater number of sex clients per week and had less knowledge of HIV than their older counterparts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>In previous studies, based on prevailing theories on health behaviors such as the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) and the Health Belief Model, the perception of HIV infection risk has been measured by the assessment of self-perceived likelihood of contracting the infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref21">21</xref>]. This experimental approach can be effectively applied to understand the behavior related to HIV or other sexually transmitted diseases and to support both specifically targeted interventions. The perception of HIV risk is one of the most studied research topics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref15">15</xref>]. HIV risk perception should, at least theoretically, induce individuals to take precautionary measures and/or to refrain from risky behaviors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref23">23</xref>]. Therefore, attempts to increase both the individual awareness and risk perception are common approaches to interventions for HIV prevention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref21">21</xref>]. In particular, the relationship between the perception of risk and risk behavior has not been fully investigated, probably due to conceptual problems. It would be therefore necessary to pay special attention to clients of CFSWs which are neither a homogeneous and well-outlined population nor easily identifiable and accessible within specific preventive interventions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Accurate self-assessment of HIV/AIDs risk perception can provide valid data to identify how people think and feel about health outcomes related to sexual risk activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref24">24</xref>]. Availabilities of data that are locally relevance can help to improve understanding of CFSW’s HIV risk perception and it effect on their sexual behavior. Such information is also critical for policy and guiding for developing effective prevention programme in current situation. Although there are some studies about HIV/AIDs risk perception and risk behavior among different populations, such as injection drug used, Men who have sex with men (MSM) and HIV positive people, there is limitation information on HIV/AIDs perception with sexual behavior and its association among direct and especially indirect CFSWs in Thailand. This study aimed to determine risk perception of HIV/AIDs and their association with sexual behaviors among CFSWs in Thailand.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Sample and Procedure</title><p>Study area, Bangkok is one of the largest metropolitan areas in Thailand where the HIV/AIDS transmission route is largely attributed to heterosexual contact. Since provision of commercial sexual services is unacceptable in Thailand and most sex workers generally operate covertly, it is impossible to estimate the actual number of CFSWs operating in Bangkok. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community primary care units are the best links to the CFSW population, and we relied on their knowledge to conduct our study among entertainment areas such as Patpong Street and Silom area where access to FSWs was considered feasible.</p><p>The cross-sectional study was employed in this study, among 141 CFSWs in Bangkok Thailand were selected from January to October 2019. By carrying out a detailed review of the literature and performing a small-scale pre-survey with a limited portion of the CFSWs in Thailand, we found the risk perception and behaviors, such as unprotected sexual intercourse, was 27% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref18">18</xref>]. By taking a sample size estimation approach, the error was calculated as 0.15 (d = 0.15) Participate proportion as 27% (P = 27%) the confident interval as 95% (95% CI) and α = 0.05 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref25">25</xref>]. The method for dada collecting: First, explorative field work was done to identify the site of CFSWs working and living. The purposive sampling and convenient sampling that has been successfully used in previous studies to recruit hidden population was employed to recruit CFSWs from drinking bar, massage parlors, A Go bar, street base female sex worker and other out-reach spots. Inclusion criteria including age 20 years and older, having had sex for money and identifying oneself as sex worker, all participants’ willingness to participate in the study. Participants were asked to sign inform consent if they couldn’t read and write Thai verbal inform consent was accepted. We explained the study purpose to each of the CFSWs and emphasized that participation was voluntary and anonymous, and they were informed about the confidentiality for their information and their right to withdraw from the study at any time.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Measurement of HIV Risk Perception</title><p>The self-access questionnaire was conducted by researcher consisted of three parts. Part one was demographic data such as age, education, marital status, and nationality. Part two was perception and self-protection of HIV and STDs and the last part was open-end questionnaire that asked for participants about their opinion and suggestion for risk behavior and perceptions. The question “How much do you think you are at HIV risk?” was conducted for measure risk of HIV/AIDs, the answer were rates based on 5 point Likert response (1 = very low, 2 = low, 3 = somewhat, 4 = much, and 5 = very much) then, the Likert score was changed to binary outcome of high HIV/AIDs risk perception (=1) and low HIV/AIDs risk perception (=0) for data analysis. The previous studies shown the acceptable for reliability and validity for this single item to measure HIV risk perception [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref27">27</xref>], other sexual behaviors were assessed base on several variables, including age of initiating sex work, frequency of sex work in the last month, unplanned sex, sex work with client without condom interpreted as risk sexual behavior, on the other hand, having a HIV test, and condom use interpreted as protective sexual behaviors. The questionnaire of this study was test for Cronbach’s alpha for the rating scale was 0.82.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were double-entered, and all statistical analyses were performed using the using statistical software. The descriptive statistic including mean, standard deviation and percentages was used for described participant’s characteristics. Chi-square test was used to compare differences of socio-demographic characteristics between high and low HIV’s perception. Then, logistic regression was employed to find factors associated with high and low of HIV perception. Statistical significance was considered at p &lt; 0.05 (two-tailed).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Characteristics of Participants</title><p>The total number of participants was 141 residents in Bangkok, Thailand. The majority were 30 - 39 year old (46.10%), 20 - 29 year old (31.91%) and 40 - 49 year old (12.06%) respectively, with mean age of 32.25 (SD = 2.32), graduated from secondary school of 48.94%, most of them were single of 32.62%, divorce of 30.50% and widow of 26.24%. The data show that 58.87% were Thai nationality, 29.79% were Myanmar and 11.35% were Lao (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Perception and Risk Behavior of HIV/AIDs</title><p>The perception of HIV/AIDs, the study shown the high perception more likely greater than low perception group, which was 51.77% shown self-rating as high risk perception of HIV/AIDs, on the other hand, 48.23% reported low perception. The knowledge of HIV/AIDs and STDs shows moderate of 46.81%, Low of 36.17% and presented high of 17.02%. Besides, the consistency of condom uses with clients the study shown CFSWs always used condom of 31.91%, sometime of 57.45% and never of 10.64%, while majority of CFSWs never used condom with their couple of 52.48%. CFSWs engaged with sex work approximately 2 - 4 years (32.62%) and majority of them have age of initiating sex work less than 30 years old (55.71%). Future more, CFSWs reported frequency of sex work in the last month less than 10 times of 46.10%, and have a high rate for unplanned sex work of 56.74%. Majority of them ever had HIV/STDs test of 91.49% and CFSWs also reported ever used illicit drugs by injection, smoking and alcohol consumption of 10.64%, 68.79%, and 93.62% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristic of CFSW (n = 141)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bachelor degree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Nationality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thai</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myanmar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lao</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.35</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Perception and self-protection from HIVs and STDs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Perceived to be at risk for HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Knowledge of HIV and STDs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Condom used with clients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Always</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sometime</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Never</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Condom used with couples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Always</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sometime</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Never</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Years engaged in sex work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age of initiating sex work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Frequency of sex work in the last month (time)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Unplanned sex work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Ever had HIV/STDs test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Ever used illicit drugs by injection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Smoking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Alcohol consumption</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.38</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Factors Association with Perception of HIV/AIDs among CFSWs</title><p>Of all CFSWs, 51.77% had high perception of HIV/AIDs. Among those age group of 30 - 39 years old more likely to have a high perception than reference group (20 - 29 years old)(adjusted OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.01 - 4.23, p-value &lt; 0.05) and those have a higher education level (secondary school of adjusted OR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.07 - 4.54, p-value &lt; 0.01). The participants from Myanmar had a low perception when compared with Thai (adjusted OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 1.11 - 4.21, p-value &lt; 0.01). Good knowledge of HIV and STDs more likely have a high perception more than moderate and poor group (adjusted OR = 3.65 and 3.22. 95% CI = 1.89 - 3.91 and 1.56 - 3.87, p-value &lt; 0.01 respectively). Condom use was more significant with high perception of HIV/AIDs (adjusted OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.05 - 2.90, p-value &lt; 0.01) and condom use with couple (Adjusted OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.11 - 3.85, p-value &lt; 0.05). For the sex work, years engaged in sex work, age of initiating in sex work, frequency of sex work in the last month and unplanned sex work were significantly with perception of HIV/AIDs (adjusted OR = 3.33, 2.71, 2.67, 2.56 and 95% CI = 1.99 - 3.84, 1.72 - 3.32, 1.29 - 3.12, 1.05 - 2.78, p-value &lt; 0.01 respectively). CFSWs who ever had HIV/STDs test trend to had a high perception (adjusted OR = 3.22, 95% CI = 2.11 - 3.95, p-value &lt; 0.01). This study also confirm that ever used illicit drug by injection, smoking and alcohol consumption had a strongly association with the high perception of HIV/AIDs among CFSWs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>HIV/AIDs infection spreading in general population occurs prevalently through sexual activity. Although the infection prevalence in general population is quite low, CFSWs bears a higher infection risk and can spread HIV to low-risk general population. This study documented risk factor and perception among CFSWs in Thailand. The true extent of CFSWs potential and occurred HIV transmission to their clients and general population must be however fully characterized since CFSWs clients have not the full perception of HIV infection risk. This study was examined risk behavior and self-perception among CFSWs in Bangkok, Thailand. Those who reported initiating sex work in and age range of 20 - 61 years (mean age 32.25). These data were like those found in previously studies, in which the age of CFSWs range between 21 and 58 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref28">28</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Factor associated with perception of HIV/AIDs among CFSW</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >High risk perception (n = 73)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Low risk perception (n = 68)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adjusted OR</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >95% CI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01 - 4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 - 2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 - 1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07 - 4.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bachelor degree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 - 2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 - 1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nationality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thai</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myanmar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11 - 4.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lao</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 - 2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge of HIV and STDs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89 - 3.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56 - 3.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Condom used with clients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Always</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sometime</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 - 2.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Never</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 - 1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Condom used with couples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Always</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sometime</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11 - 3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Never</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98 - 2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Years engaged in sex work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99 - 3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21 - 3.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 - 3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30 - 2.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age of initiating sex work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72 - 3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67 - 3.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Frequency of sex work in the last month (time)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29 - 3.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57 - 2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unplanned sex work</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 - 2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ever had an HIV/STDs test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11 - 3.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Ever used illicit drugs by injection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57 - 3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Smoking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 - 3.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alcohol consumption</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72 - 2.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The result of this study found that more than half of participants (51.77%) perceived themselves to be a high risk of HIV. This finding is consistent with evidence found in previous studies that reported high risk for HIV among CFSWs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref30">30</xref>]. Results of this study showed that participant who had a higher frequency of sex work and years engage in sex work more likely to perceive themselves to be a high risk of HIV/AIDs infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref29">29</xref>]. Several studies reported that having high number of sexual works is associated with an increased perceived of risk for HIV infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>As already confirmed by literature studies a high level of education has been observed among study group and the result also confirmed that high education trend to have a high perception and have a low risk of HIV/AIDs infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref34">34</xref>]. Previous studies also confirmed that CFSWs with high HIV knowledge perceived themselves at lower risk for HIV infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref36">36</xref>]. One of the interesting findings was that the CFSWs who had HIV/STDs testing were more likely to perceive themselves to be at risk with HIV than those who had not tested for HIV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref29">29</xref>]. The reason explanation for this finding is that CFSWs who engage in risk behaviors may feel to be at high risk for HIV and seek more HIV test services. Our finding suggest that it is necessary to provide educational programme to enable CFSWs to correctly judge their own risk for getting HIV and encourage them for HIV testing. On the other hand, improving accessibility of HIV testing for CFSWs can be an important strategy for HIV prevention among this group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref29">29</xref>].</p><p>For instance, it was found in many studies that knowledge on HIV prevention enables protective sexual behavior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref37">37</xref>]. Additionally, CFSWs who had a sound knowledge on HIV/AIDS tended to reduce their numbers of partners and use condoms during sexual intercourse, which resulted in them feeling protected against HIV, thereby increasing the rate of condom use as the partners became more familiar and intimate. In contrast, numerous studies show little impact on condom use with increased knowledge of its benefits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref39">39</xref>]. Since the 100% condom-use programme was implemented in Thailand, there have been many campaigns aimed at helping people understand how to use condom and from where condom is available, and information on the availability of condoms was circulated everywhere. However, using condom also varied for some other reasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref40">40</xref>]. This study found that the number CFSWs who always use condom with clients of 31.91%. This study also found that CFSWs who inconsistently used condom with their client perceived themselves to be a high risk of HIV/AIDs infection compared to those CFSWs who consistently used condoms. Previous studies showed another barrier to condom use with clients such as absence of self-efficacy among CFSWs, social norms unsupportive of condom use, and gender inequality in sexual relationship of CFSWs with their sexual partners [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref43">43</xref>]. Therefore, it seems that these CFSWs think they must accept the idea of being at risk. They need to get enough money to live on, so they do not have enough power to negotiate about safe sex behaviors with sexual partners because of fear of rejection by their sexual partners and fear of losing their emotional of financial support [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119919-ref29">29</xref>]. This study also found that CFSWs who had injection drugs, alcohol consumption and smoke perceived themselves to be a high risk of HIV/AIDs infection, those factors lead them to have more clients and high frequency of sex work.</p><p>Finding of this study had several limitations, first, no causal inferences were drawn due to the cross-sectional natural of the study. Second, the result of this study might have been affected by measurement error because self-access questionnaire was used and the recruitment of CFSWs used convenient and accidental sampling. Therefore, the results cannot be generalized to all CFSWs in all country. Despite these limitations, this study provided important insights about HIV risk perception and its association with sexual behaviors and experiences among CFSWs that can be used for HIV prevention programme.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>CFSWs with risky sexual behaviors correctly perceived themselves to be at high risk of HIV/AIDs. Therefore, it seems that they were aware of their individual risk behaviors. However, the finding is that CFSWs with high HIV knowledge considered themselves to be at higher risk. Thus, educational programme is necessary to enable CFSWs to correctly assess their own HIV risk and encourage behavioral change based on self-assessment of actual risk. Furthermore, risk behaviors such as inconsistently condom use, high frequency of sex works and clients, injection drug use, and alcohol consumption during sex work, lead CFSWs to perceive themselves to be a high risk of HIV/AIDs infection. Also, the Government Organizations and Non-Government Organizations should bring these findings including for HIV/AIDs control and prevention programme to decrease HIV/AIDs infection among CFSWs groups.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank the peer interviewers for their dedication and support, all participants who supported the benefit data and NGOs in Bangkok for best linked to CFSW groups. This study was partly supported by Naresuan University, Thailand. And we also appreciated to Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biotechnology (CEMB) Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University for manuscript preparation.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Surit, P., Yasothornsrikul, S. and Mitkitti, R. (2022) HIV/AIDs Risk Perception and Sexual Behavior among Commercial Female Sex Worker in Thailand. World Journal of AIDS, 12, 141-155. https://doi.org/10.4236/wja.2022.123011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119919-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NAC (2014) Thailand National Operating Plan Accelerating Ending AIDS 2015-2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NAC (2015) “Thailand AIDs Response Process Report 2015” and Thai MoH/NAC/UNAIDS “AIDS Zero Portal: Data Use Tool”.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Health (2010) NACP, UNGASS Country Progress Report 2010: Thailand Reporting Period January 2008-December 2009. National AIDS Control Programme.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, T. and Thailand A2 Team (2005) Preliminary Results of HIV/AIDS Projection 2005-2025. The Integrated Analysis and Advocacy—HIV/AIDS Projection Meeting, Bangkok, 12-14 August 2005, 102-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Decker, M.R., McCauley, H.L., et al. (2010) Sex Trafficking, Sexual Risk, Sexually Transmitted Infection and Reproductive Health among Female Sex Workers in Thailand. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 100, 52-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Surit, P., Jariya, W., Zheng, N., Yi, H., Yu, X.J., Srithong, W. and Mirasena, S. (2017) Risk Factors Affecting Condom Use among Royal Thai Army Conscripts in Thailand. World Journal of AIDS, 7, 92-105. https://doi.org/10.4236/wja.2017.72009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO South-East Asia Regional Office and Ministry of Public Health (2005) External Review of the Health Sector Response to HIV/AIDS in Thailand. Bangkok.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Thailand Ministry of Public Health (2008) Annual Report on National HIV Sero-Surveillance, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanenberg, R. and Rojanapithayakorn, W. (1998) Changes in Prostitution and the AIDS Epidemic in Thailand. AIDS Care, 10, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/713612352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hsieh, Y.H. and Hsun Chen, C. (2004) Modelling the Social Dynamics of a Sex Industry: Its Implications for Spread of HIV/AIDS. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 66, 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2003.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Nations Development Programme (2004) Thailand’s Response to HIV/AIDS: Progress and Challenges.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buckingham, R.W. and Meister, E. (2003) Condom Utilization among Female Sex Workers in Thailand: Assessing the Value of the Health Belief Model. Californian Journal of Health Promotion, 4, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.32398/cjhp.v1i4.540</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buckingham, R.W., Meister, E. and Webb, N. (2004) Condom Use among the Female Sex Worker Population in Thailand. International Journal of STD &amp; AIDS, 15, 210-211. https://doi.org/10.1258/095646204322916731</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buckingham, R.W., Moraros, J., Bird, Y., Meister, E. and Webb, N.C. (2005) Factors Associated with Condom Use among Brothel-Based Female Sex Workers in Thailand. AIDS Care, 17, 640-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120412331319697</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baral, S., Beyrer, C., Muessig, K., et al. (2012) Burden of HIV among Female Sex Workers in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 12, 538-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70066-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paz-Bailey, G., Noble, M., Salo, K. and Tregear, S.J. (2016) Prevalence of HIV among US Female Sex Workers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 2318-2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1332-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beyrer, C., Crago, A.L., Bekker, L.G., et al. (2015) An Action Agenda for HIV and Sex Workers. The Lancet, 385, 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60933-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buckingham, R.W., Moraros, J., Bird, Y., Meister, E. and Webb, N.C. (2005) Factors Associated with Condom Use among Brothel-Based Female Sex Workers in Thailand. AIDS Care, 17, 640-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120412331319697</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weinstein, N.D. (1993) Testing 4 Competing Theories of Health Protective Behavior. Health Psychology, 12, 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.12.4.324</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janz, N.K. and Becker, M.H. (1984) The Health Belief Model—A Decade Later. Health Education, 11, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenstock, I.M. (1974) Historical Origins of Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs, 2, 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Schwarzer, R. (1992) Self-Efficacy in the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors. Theoretical Approaches and New Model. In: Schwarzer, R., Ed., Self-Efficacy. Though Control of Action, Hemisphere, Washington DC, 217-243.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwarzer, R. (1999) Self-Regulatory Processes in the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behavior. Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539900400208</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janssen, E., van Osch, L., De Vries, H. and Lechner, L. (2011) Measuring Risk Perception of Skin Cancer: Reliability and Validity of Different Operationalizations. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 92-112. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X514120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lwanga, S.K., Lemeshow, S. and World Health Organization (1991) Sample Size Determination in Health Studies: A Practical Manual/S.K. Lwanga and S. Lemeshow. World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Needle, R.H., Coyle, S.L., Genser, S.G. and Trotter, R. (1995) Social Networks, Drug Abuse, and HIV Transition. NIDA Research Monograph, 5, 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1037/e495782006-001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dowling-Guyer, S., Johnson, M.E., Fisher, D.G., Needle, R., Watters, J., Adersen, M., et al. (1994) Reliability of Drug Users’ Self-Reported HIV Risk Behaviors and Validity of Self-Report of Self-Drug Use. Assessment, 1, 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119400100407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shah, N.S., Shiraishi, R.W., Wonchart, S., Abhijeet, A., Sara, J., et al. (2007) Bridging Populations—Sexual Risk Behaviors and HIV Prevalence in Clients and Partners of Female Sex Workers, Bangkok, Thailand. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 88, 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9542-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zahra, J.S., Seyed, A.H., Homeira, A., Yahya, S., Armita, S. and Tom, A.B.S. (2019) HIV Risk Perception and Sexual Behaviors among Female Sex Workers in Tehran, Ian. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 33, 101.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prata, N., Morris, L., Mazive, E., Vahidnia, F. and Stehr, M. (2006) Relationship between HIV Risk Perception and Condom Use: Evidence from a Population-Based Survey in Mozambique. International Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1363/3219206</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shiferaw, Y., Alemu, A., Assefa, A., Tesfaye, B., Gibermedhin, E. and Amare, M. (2014) Perception of Risk of HIV and Sexual Risk Behaviors among University Students: Implication for Planning Interventions. BMC Research Notes, 7, Article No. 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rana, M.S., Nepali, B., Sathian, B., Aryal, R.P., Thapalia, M. and Bhatta, D.R. (2013) Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Clients of Female Sex Workers and Their Perspectives, Behaviors and Attitude on HIV and AIDS. A Questionnaire-Based Survey from Pokhara, Nepal. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7, 112-117. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/4391.2683</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manopaiboon, C., Prybylski, D., Subhachaturas, W., Tanpradech, S., Suksripanich, O., Siangphoe, U., Johnston, L.G., Akarasewi, P., Anand, A., et al. (2013) Unexpectedly High HIV Prevalence among Female Sex Workers in Bangkok, Thailand in a Respondent-Driven Sampling Survey. International Journal of STD &amp; AIDS, 24, 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462412472300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noroozi</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mirzazadeh</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Farhoudian</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Khankeh</surname><given-names> H.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Higgs</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Sharifi</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Noroozi</surname><given-names> M. et al. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>. Impact of HIV Status Notification on Risk Behaviors among Men Who Inject Drugs in Kermanshah, West of Iran</article-title><source> Journal of Research in Health Sciences</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 116</fpage>-<lpage>121</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koh, K.C. and Yong, L.S. (2014) HIV Risk Perception, Sexual Behavior, and HIV Prevalence among Men-Who-Have-Sex-with-Men at a Community-Based Voluntary Counseling and Testing Center in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IPID, 23, 6240. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/236240</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarker, M., Milkowski, A., Slanger, T., Gondos, A., Sanou, A., Kouyate, B. and Snow, R. (2005) The Role of HIV Related Knowledge and Ethnicity in Determining HIV Risk Perception and Willingness to Undergo HIV Testing among Rural Women in Burkina Faso. AIDS and Behavior, 9, 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-005-3905-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magnani, R.J., Karim, A.M., Weiss, L.A., et al. (2002) Reproductive Health Risk and Protective Factors among Youth in Lusaka, Zambia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00328-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Essien, E.J., Mgbere, O., Monjok, E., et al. (2010) Predictors of Frequency of Condom Use and Attitudes among Sexually Active Female Military Personnel in Nigeria. HIV AIDS (Auckl), 2, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S9415</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, B.G., Taljaard, D., Campbell, C.M., et al. (2003) Changing Patterns of Knowledge, Reported Behaviour and Sexually Transmitted Infections in a South African Gold Mining Community. AIDS, 17, 2099-2107. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200309260-00011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chai, P., Xenos, P. and Varangrat, A. (2001) The Risk of Premarital Sex among Thai Youth: Individual and Family Influences. J Pop Soc Stud, 12, 1-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mgone, C.S., Passey, M.E., Anang, J., et al. (2002) Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections among Female Sex Workers in Two Major Cities in Papua New Guinea. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007435-200205000-00003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruce, E., Bauai, L., Yeka, W., et al. (2010) Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Behavior of Female Sex Workers in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Sex Health, 7, 85-86. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09089</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119919-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gare, J., Lupiwa, T., Suarkia, D.L., et al. (2005) High Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections among Female Sex Workers in the Eastern Highland’s Province of Papua New Guinea: Correlates and Recommendations. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32, 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.olq.0000161177.21639.96</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>