<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2022.139081</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-119823</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Potassium Source and Dose on Yield and Quality of Strawberry Fruit
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amal</surname><given-names>Nakro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>Bamouh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oumaima</surname><given-names>El Khatib</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lamiae</surname><given-names>Ghaouti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Plant Production, Protection and Biotechnology, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences, Rabat, Morocco</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1196</fpage><lpage>1208</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>16,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of potassium fertilization source and dose on productivity and quality parameters of strawberry. 
  The trial was conducted in 2016-2017 at the experimental greenhouse of Hass
  an II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences in Rabat. Strawberry plants of the cultivar “San Andreas” were planted on November 6
  <sup>th</sup> in 12 liter pots equipped with a gravity fertigation system. The experimental design was 
  a split-plot with eight treatment combinations of two potassium fertilizer sources: 1) Potassium Sulphate for the whole growing cycle (PS/PS); 2) Potassium Nitrate during the vegetative period and Potassium Sulfate during the fruit production period (PN/PS) and four potassium fertilizer doses: 100, 200, 300 and 400 kg/ha of K
  <sub>2</sub>O replicated thrice. Potassium sulfate source was superior to potassium nitrate on the improvement of productivity and quality parameters of strawberry fruit. Potassium sulphate improved the number of flowers by 16%, fruit production by 21%, sugar content by 3%, and titrable acidity content by 0.5 g/L. The highest yield was recorded in plants receiving 300 kg/ha K
  <sub>2</sub>O as potassium sulphate. The 300 kg K
  <sub>2</sub>O/ha dose gave also superior results regarding quality parameters of strawberry fruit. This optimum potassium dose enhanced number of flowers by 35%, fruits produced by 44%, sugar content by 25% and titrable acidity content by 0.9 g/L.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Strawberry</kwd><kwd> Fertilization</kwd><kwd> Potassium</kwd><kwd> Productivity</kwd><kwd> Quality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Strawberry (Fragaria &#215; ananassa Duch.) is one of the most widespread fruit crops in the world. In Morocco, strawberry cultivation has undergone a significant evolution of cultivated area and production, from 750 ha with 31,000 T harvested in 1995 to 3400 ha with an average production of 102,000 T in 2021 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref1">1</xref>]. More than three quarters of strawberry production in Morocco is exported, 22% fresh from November to March and 45% frozen from April to July. The production rest is sold to the local market. During the 2020-2021crop year, exports reached 22,400 T in fresh state and 67,900 T in frozen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref1">1</xref>]. This small fruit is grown in the Loukkos-Gharb region, including 83% in the Loukkos perimeter and 17% in that of Gharb and involves 593 farms from 0.2 to 70 ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>To compete in the export market, Moroccan strawberry growers are opting for high performance varieties in terms of earliness, organoleptic qualities and shelf-life. For this, farmers must master appropriate techniques, mainly fertilization, in order to balance productivity, regularity of production and quality of strawberry fruits throughout the cycle. A strawberry marketing is essentially conditioned by quality parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref2">2</xref>], of which sugar content, acidity content and visual appearance are the main determinants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Potassium is an essential mineral element for strawberries, which require large amounts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref5">5</xref>]. It has essential functions within the plant in the production and transfer of proteins and sugars, in regulating water movement within the plant, and in improving plant tolerance to diseases and pests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref6">6</xref>]. However, potassium affects significantly growth, production and quality parameters of strawberry plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref7">7</xref>]. During the strawberry fruiting period, potassium requirements increase to meet fruit needs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref9">9</xref>], which contains a large proportion of potassium. Potassium is thus considered a determinant of strawberry quality parameters such as sugar content, vitamin C content and fruit acidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref10">10</xref>]. These parameters tend to increase with the potassium fertilization dose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref11">11</xref>]. Indeed, a higher potassium concentration in the nutrient solution improved strawberry fruit quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>In addition, potassium plays an essential role in the transfer of assimilates to fruit. Reduced assimilate transport limits strawberry productivity and quality and is often a consequence of potassium deficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>It is recognized that excess or deficient fertilizers can have a significant impact on yield, quality and profitability of vegetable crops. The strawberry fertilization is particularly challenging since this crop is one of the most sensitive plants in horticultural production due to its shallow root system, pH requirement and sensitivity to salinity of nutrient solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref15">15</xref>]. Choice of fertilizers, timing of their application and appropriate doses remain the key factors ensuring good yield and quality fruits.</p><p>In the Loukkos region, the strawberry potassium requirement for a yield of 60 tons/ha, is about 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref16">16</xref>]. In this region, strawberry fertilization is conducted by fertigation throughout the cycle, as it is a technique that maximizes productivity by reducing environmental impact [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref17">17</xref>] and increases fertilizer use efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref18">18</xref>]. The main fertilizers used by Loukkos strawberry growers under fertigation are potassium nitrate (PN) and potassium sulfate (PS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref19">19</xref>]. Strawberry growers favor the PN source during the early part of the cycle when the average temperature is low and the PS source from flowering onwards.</p><p>The aim of the present research is to study the effect of potassium fertilizer source and dose on strawberry productivity and quality through a pot trial conducted under controlled conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Experimental Site and Substrate</title><p>Agronomic trial was installed in the experimental greenhouse of the Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute in Rabat during the 2016-2017 crop year. The substrate used is a mixture of sandy soil from coastal areas, clay and commercial peat. The substrate has a pH suitable to the requirements of strawberry plant and moderately rich in organic matter and mineral macro-elements (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Plant Material and Potassium Treatments</title><p>The trial was conducted in 12 liter pots (Length = 60 cm, width = 20 cm, depth = 15 cm). Three bare-root plants, of SAN ANDREAS cultivar, were planted per pot on November 6, 2016. Originally from California, it is one of the three strawberry cultivars widely adopted in the Loukkos region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>The treatments tested were two potassium fertilizer sources: 1) Potassium sulfate for all the growth cycle (PS/PS) 2) Potassium nitrate during the vegetative period and Potassium sulfate during the fruit production period (PN/PS) combined with four potassium fertilizer doses: 100, 200, 300 and 400 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha. The total nitrogen, phosphorus, magnesium and calcium application dose was identical for the eight potassium fertilizer source and dose treatments (179 kg N/ha, 165 kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>/ha, 55 kg CaO/ha and 14 kg MgO/ha).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Fertigation Management</title><p>The pots were individually equipped with fertigation tanks, drip irrigation systems and drains with taps to collect the drainage and allow fertigation management.</p><p>Fertigation solutions were applied daily by adjusting the irrigation dose based on the drained water volume which is maintained between 10% and 20% of the supplied water volume [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref21">21</xref>] and by measuring the pH and electrical conductivity of the nutrient solutions and drainate which should meet the specific requirements of strawberry<sup>1</sup>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of the culture substrate prepared for the trial</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Organic matter content (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N-NH 4 + (mg/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N-NO 3 − (mg/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaCO<sub>3</sub> (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Electrical conductivity (mmhos/cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Agronomic Measurements</title><p>In order to evaluate the effects of potassium fertilizer source and dose and the timing of its application in fertigation on production and quality of strawberry fruit, parameters related to the growth, production and quality of hand harvested strawberries were measured every week.</p><p>The growth parameters recorded were:</p><p>• Plant water consumption determined by the difference between the volume of water brought to the plants and the volume of water drained from the pots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref24">24</xref>];</p><p>• Flowering dynamics consisted of counting the number of flowers per plant.</p><p>The production parameters measured were:</p><p>• Fruiting dynamic recorded as number of fruits per plant and average fruit weight harvested;</p><p>• Fruit yield measured through the cumulative weight of strawberry production during the whole harvest period which lasted 13 weeks.</p><p>The quality parameters concerned:</p><p>• Sugar content (˚Brix) in fruit measured by placing 1 to 2 drops of clear juice fruit on the prism of a digital refractometer (HI 96801, HANNA). The prism of the refractometer was washed with distilled water and dried between samples;</p><p>• Titratable acidity of fruit juice determined by titration method using a benchtop pH meter (CONSORT P107) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref25">25</xref>]. The titrated volume of 0.1 M NaOH was recorded to an endpoint of pH 8.1;</p><p>• Dry matter content of strawberries of which the sampled fresh fruits were weighed and then oven dried at 80 deg C temperature for 48 hours before being weighed their dry weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref25">25</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The obtained data were analyzed for significant differences using SYSTAT 13 statistical software. A two-factor analysis of variance was performed for each parameter studied to assess significant differences at the 5% level in treatments and their interaction for all parameters.</p><p>Comparison of the treatment means was performed using the Newman-Keuls test at significance level of 5% probability.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Strawberry Growth Parameters</title><p>Fertilization with potassium sulfate at 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha dose showed the best results of water consumption and flowers produced per plant during the cycle. Indeed, plants receiving 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha of potassium sulfate consumed more water and produced more flowers compared to other treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Analysis of variance did not reveal a significant difference in the combined effect of potassium fertilizer source and dose on plant water consumption (p = 0.450) and</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of potassium fertilizer source and dose on strawberry growth parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Water consumption (L/plant)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of flowers/plant</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.3<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Source x Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.3<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.1<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.2<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.1<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Probability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.172<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.051*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.212<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.030*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source &#215; Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.450<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.630<sup>NS</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PS: Potassium sulfate; PN: potassium Nitrate; D1: 100 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D2: 200 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D3: 300 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D4: 400 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha. *Significant effects at threshold P: 0.05; NS: Non-significant effects.</p><p>number of flowers produced during the strawberry cycle (p = 0.630), but our results show that potassium sulfate at 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha increased nutrient solution consumption by 19% and improved flowering by 27% compared to potassium nitrate at the same potassium fertilizer dose.</p><p>The improvement in strawberry growth parameters could be attributed to the observed increase in water use in the PS treatment which is explained by the optimal effect of the applied potassium dose. Indeed, the application of potassium at optimal dose has a positive impact on water use efficiency of maize [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref26">26</xref>] thus improving its growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref27">27</xref>] and allows vigorous growth and early flowering of tomato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref28">28</xref>]. Kering and Broderic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref29">29</xref>] showed that millet plant growth was maximal around 80 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha and above this dose the plants were shorter.</p><p>Our results are in agreement with the literature that demonstrates the functional role of potassium in the plant growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref30">30</xref>] and the improvement of crop water supply [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref32">32</xref>], which improves nutrient uptake of plant and increase photosynthesis rate needed for flower induction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref33">33</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Strawberry Production Parameters</title><p>Strawberry fruit production was significantly increased by fertilizing with potassium sulfate, an increase of 22% over potassium nitrate. Indeed, the highest number of fruits was recorded in plants receiving potassium sulfate as a source of potassium fertilizer during the cycle (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Potassium sulfate improved yield by 19% compared to potassium nitrate, but this difference was not statistically significant.</p><p>An optimum effect of D3 dose corresponding to 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha was observed on the production parameters. This effect is demonstrated by the analysis of variance which confirms that this dose of potassium fertilization significantly increased number of fruits by 45% and yield by 50% compared to the lowest dose D1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The highest yield of 14 T/ha was recorded in plants receiving potassium sulfate as a source of potassium fertilizer at 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha dose. PS-D3 improved fruit number by 14% and yield by 8% compared to potassium nitrate at the same dose (PN-D3), but these differences were not statistically significant.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of potassium fertilizer source and dose on strawberry production parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of fruits/plant</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average fruit weight (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruit yield (T/ha)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Source x Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.1<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Probability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.737<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.099<sup>NS</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0163*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.174<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source x Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.275<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.802<sup>NS</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PS: Potassium sulfate; PN: potassium Nitrate; D1: 100 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D2: 200 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D3: 300 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D4: 400 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha. *Significant effects at threshold P: 0.05; NS: Non-significant effects.</p><p>These results are consistent with our previous observations regarding the positive effect of potassium sulfate at an optimal fertigation dose on growth parameters. Indeed, the improvement of strawberry production parameters by potassium sulfate at 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha are attributed to the increase in flower number [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>In an experimental trial comparing two sources of potassium fertilizer, it was observed that potassium sulfate improved pepper yield more than potassium nitrate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref35">35</xref>].</p><p>The positive effect of potassium sulfate as a source of potassium fertilizer on yield has also been observed in tomato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref36">36</xref>] and fruit trees such as apple [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref37">37</xref>] in soil fertilization trials and in passion fruit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref38">38</xref>] and strawberry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref39">39</xref>] conducted in hydroponic systems. The same trend was noted in chili crop where Medhi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref40">40</xref>] reported that potassium application maximize the number of fruits per plant and Ananthi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref41">41</xref>] showed that potassium sulfate application improves fruit number per plant, fruit weight and thus yield.</p><p>High potassium levels contribute to vigorous growth of strawberry plant, helping it to support a greater number of fruits per plant. This is justified by the increased chlorophyll content of the foliage, which increases photosynthesis rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref42">42</xref>], carbohydrate synthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref43">43</xref>] and thus increases fruit production and number of fruits per plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref44">44</xref>]. Indeed, additional potassium fertilization positively influences leaf area development, chlorophyll content, reproductive parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref4">4</xref>] and increases fruit yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref45">45</xref>] of strawberry crop.</p><p>Our results are in agreement with those reported by Yagmur et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref46">46</xref>] who stated that the application of an optimal dose of potassium at 360 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha significantly increases average fruit weight and results in higher yield in tomato. Others researches also reported that optimal potassium supply maximizes yield of tomato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref47">47</xref>] and strawberry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref48">48</xref>]. The study results of Zelelew et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref49">49</xref>] showed that potassium had significant effect on potato growth.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Strawberry Quality Parameters</title><p>Potassium fertilizer source had a positive effect on sugar content of strawberry fruit and a significant effect on titratable acidity. Indeed, potassium sulfate improved sugar content (˚Brix) by 4% and titratable acidity by 7% compared to potassium nitrate (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>A dose of 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha significantly influences sugar content of strawberries and thus allows the increase of ˚Brix by 25% compared to the lowest dose.</p><p>The optimum effect of D3 (300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha) is also observed for acidity content of strawberry fruits. Indeed, the highest results of titratable acidity 7.4 g/L and 6.9 g/L were recorded in the PS-D3 and PN-D3 treatments respectively.</p><p>The results of our study showed that potassium sulfate at 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha increased sugar content and titratable acidity of strawberry fruits by 9% and 7% respectively compared to potassium nitrate at the same dose (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Our results are in agreement with those reported by Ahmad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref47">47</xref>] that potassium sulfate significantly influences fruit quality. Indeed, in experimental</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of potassium fertilizer source and dose on strawberry fruit quality parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sugar content (˚Brix)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Titratable acidity (g/L)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Source x Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4-PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4-PN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Probability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0302*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source &#215; Dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.131<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.540<sup>NS</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PS: Potassium sulfate; PN: potassium Nitrate; D1: 100 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D2: 200 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D3: 300 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha; D4: 400 Kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha. *Significant effects at threshold P: 0.05; NS: Non-significant effects.</p><p>trials comparing two potassium fertilizer sources, it was observed that PS improves fruit quality more than PC (potassium chloride) in cucumber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref50">50</xref>], kiwi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref51">51</xref>] and other vegetables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref52">52</xref>].</p><p>The positive effect of potassium sulfate as a source of potassium fertilizer on fruit quality has also been observed in tomato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref53">53</xref>] and pepper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref54">54</xref>].</p><p>Potassium plays an important role in photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref55">55</xref>]. Marschner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref42">42</xref>] demonstrated that potassium fertilization increases photosynthesis rate in leaves and thus optimal potassium supply results in higher sugar content in reserve organs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref56">56</xref>]. According to Rodas et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref57">57</xref>], the highest sugar contents and the best titratable acidity were obtained in strawberry fruits from plants receiving 344.50 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha. Indeed, El-Nemr et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref58">58</xref>] confirm that higher potassium concentration in the nutrient solution increases titratable acidity and Awad-Allah et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119823-ref59">59</xref>] showed that all quality parameters of garlic bulb increased significantly with increasing K levels.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Fertilization of strawberry plants with potassium sulfate at 300 kg K<sub>2</sub>O/ha showed superior results in terms of production and fruit quality parameters. In fact, this optimal dose, as PS is a source of potassium, significantly increased number of flowers by 27%, fruit production by 14%, yield by 8%, sugar content by 9% and citric acid content by 7% (0.5 g/L). These effects could be attributed to the increase in nutrient solution consumption observed in the PS-D3 treatment, in the order of 19%, explained by the potassium role in improving crop water supply leading to increased leafs photosynthesis rate, fruits production and sugars translocation to fruit which contributed to improved strawberry fruit yield and quality.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors gratefully acknowledge the members of the Soil and water analysis laboratory of Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences for their support during the accomplishment of analysis of substrate prepared for the trial.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nakro, A., Bamouh, A., El Khatib, O. and Ghaouti, L. (2022) Effect of Potassium Source and Dose on Yield and Quality of Strawberry Fruit. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13, 1196-1208. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2022.139081</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119823-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Interproberries Maroc: Moroccan Interprofessional Federation of Red Fruits.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Darbellay, C., Carlen, C., Azodanlou, R. and Villettaz, J.C. (2002) Measurement of the Organoleptic Quality of Strawberries. Proceedings of the 4th International Strawberry Symposium, 1-2, 819-822. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.567.181</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sadat, T., Ebrahimzadeh, H., Rahemi, A., Babalar, M. and Ebadi, A. (2006) The Effect of Nitrate: Ammonium Ratios on Fruit Quality of the Strawberry Cultivar “Selva”. Acta Horticulturae, 708, 313-318.  
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.708.53</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khayyat, M., Vazifeshenas, M.R., Rajaee, S. and Jamalian, S. (2009) Potassium Effect on Ion Leakage, Water Usage, Fruit Yield and Biomass Production by Strawberry Plants Grown under NACL Stress. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 17, 79-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ebrahimi, R., Souri, M.K., Ebrahimi, F. and Ahmadizadeh, M. (2012) Growth and Yield of Strawberries under Different Potassium Concentrations of Hydroponic System in Three Substrates. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16, 1380-1386.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnston, A.E. (2003) Understanding Potassium and Its Use in Agriculture. European Fertilizer Manufacturers Association, Brussels.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bibi, S., Mulk Khan, S., Rehman A., Ur-rahman, I., Ijaz, F., Sohail, Afzal, A. and Khan, R. (2016) The Effect of Potassium on Growth and Yield of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 48, 1407-1413.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinsson, M., Kwast, A., Cieslinski, G. and Treder, W. (2006) Impact of Production Systems and Fertilizer Application on Yield and Quality of Strawberries. Acta Horticulturae, 708, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.708.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tohidloo, G., Souri, M.K. and Eskandarpour, S. (2018) Growth and Fruit Biochemical Characteristics of Three Strawberry Genotypes under Different Potassium Concentrations of Nutrient Solution. Open Agriculture, 3, 356-362.  
https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lester, G.E., Jifon, J.L. and Makus, D.J. (2010) Impact of Potassium Nutrition on Food Quality of Fruits and Vegetables: A Condensed and Concise Review of the Literature. Better Crops, 94, 18-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vago, I., Tolner, L. and Loch, L. (2009) Effect of Chloride Anionic Stress on the Yield Amount and Some Quality Parameters of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). VIII Alps-Adria Scientific Workshop, Vol. 37, 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Preciado-Rangel, P., Troyo-Diéguez, E., Valdez-Aguilar, L.A., García-Hernández, J.L. and Luna-Ortega, J.G. (2020) Interactive Effects of the Potassium and Nitrogen Relationship on Yield and Quality of Strawberry Grown Under Soilless Conditions. Plants, 9, 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040441</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anac, D. and Martin-Prével, P. (1999) Improved Crop Quality by Nutrient Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-37449-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez Barroso, M.C. and Alvarez, C.E. (1997) Toxicity Symptoms and Tolerance of Strawberry to Salinity in the Irrigation Water. Scientia Horticulturae, 71, 177-188.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00082-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suarez, D.L. and Grieve, C.M. (2013) Growth, Yield, and Ion Relations of Strawberry in Response to Irrigation with Chlorine-Dominated Waters. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 36, 1963-1981. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2013.766210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chamekh, A. (2009) Etude de la conduite culturale du fraisier, du framboisier et du myrtilier et contribution à l’étude de marché d’exportation des petits fruits. Mémoire de fin d’étude en horticulture. Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hagin, J., Sneh, M. and Lowengart-Aycicegi, A. (2002) Fertigation: Fertilization Through irrigation. IPI, Basel, 81 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kafkafi, U. and Tarchitzky, J. (2011) Fertigation: A Tool for Efficient Fertilizer and Water Management. IFA/IPI, Paris, 141 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanji, A., Benicha, M. and Mamdouh, M. (2014) Techniques de production du fraisier. Bulletin de Transfert de technologie en agriculture, 201, 1-9. 
https://www.agrimaroc.net/bulletins/btta_201.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berjamy, I. (2015) Etude du profil variétal du fraisier (Fragaria vulgaris) dans le périmètre du Loukkos. Mémoire de fin d’études, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coquelet, C., Izard, D., Navatel, J.C., Poncet, M. and Taussig, C. (2003) La fraise en culture suspendue. APREL-SEFRA, Paris, 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atwood, J. (2005) Strawberry Fertigation: Future Issues. Journées Horticoles Régionales du MAPAQ.  
https://www.agrireseau.net/petitsfruits/documents/jhrpfjohnatwood.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Izard, D. (2010) La fraise en culture sur substrat. APREL-SEFRA (France), Paris, 6 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaya, C., Kirnak, H. and Higgs, D. (2001a) Effects of supplementary Potassium and Phosphorus on Physiological Development and Mineral Nutrition of Cucumber and Pepper Cultivars Grown at High Salinity (NaCl). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 24, 1457-1471. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-100106995</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OECD (2009) Guidance on Objective Tests to Determine Quality of Fruits and Vegetables and Dry and Dried Produce.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bahrani, A., Pourreza, J., Madani, A. and Amiri, F. (2012) Effect of PRD Irrigation Method and Potassium Fertilizer Application on Corn Yield and Water Use Efficiency. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18, 616-625.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubar, S., Zia-ul-hassan, A., Shah, I.R. and Qureshi, S.A. (2013) Response of Maize to a Novel Organic Potassium Fertilizer Developed from Fruit and Vegetable Wastes. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Sciences, 1, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varis, S. and George, R.A.T. (1985) The Influence of Mineral Nutrition on Fruit Yield, Seed Yield and Quality in Tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science, 60, 373-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1985.11515641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kering, M. and Broderick, C. (2018) Potassium and Manganese Fertilization and the Effects on Millet Seed Yield, Seed Quality, and Forage Potential of Residual Stalks. Agricultural Sciences, 9, 888-900. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2018.97061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandal, P.N., Singh, K.P., Singh, V.K. and Roy, R.K. (2012) Effect of Production and Plant Growth Regulators on Quality and Economics of Hybrid Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]. Advance Research Journal of Crop Improvement, 3, 5-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marschner, H. (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher. 2nd Edition, Plants Academic Press, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shukla, S.K., Yadav, R.L., Singh, P.N. and Singh, I. (2009) Potassium Nutrition for Improving Stubble Bud Sprouting, Dry Matter Partitioning, Nutrient Uptake and Winter Initiated Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrid Complex) Ratoon Yield. European Journal of Agronomy, 30, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.06.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names> S.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Seed Production of Tomato as Influenced by Nitrogen, Phosphorous and Potassium Fertilization</article-title><source> Annals of Agricultural Sciences</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 399</fpage>-<lpage>400</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bradfield, E.G., Bonatsos, D. and Stickland, J.F. (1975) Potassium Nutrition of Strawberry Plant: Effect of Potassium Treatment and of Rooting Media on Components of Yield and Critical Leaf Potassium Concentrations. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 26, 669-674. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740260512</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Golcz, A., Kujawski, P. and Politycka, B. (2004) The Influence Kind of Fertilizer Potassium on Yielding Hot Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Folia Universitatis Agriculturae Stetinensis. Agricultura, 95, 109-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hewedy</surname><given-names> A.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Effect of Methods and Sources of Potassium Application on the Productivity and Fruit Quality of Some New Tomato Hybrids</article-title><source> Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research</source><volume> 78</volume>,<fpage> 227</fpage>-<lpage>244</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Attala</surname><given-names> E.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1998</year>)<article-title>Effect of Potassium Fertilization on Anna Apple Trees Grown in Sandy Soils of Egypt</article-title><source> Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research</source><volume> 76</volume>,<fpage> 709</fpage>-<lpage>719</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa-Araujo, R., Horst Bruckner, C., Prieto Martinez, H.E., Chamhum Salom&amp;#227;o, L.C., Alvarez, V.H., Pereira de Souza, A., Esfrain Pereira, W. and Hizumi, S. (2006) Quality of Yellow Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims f. flavicarpa Deg.) as Affected by Potassium Nutrition. Fruits, 61, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2006009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khayyat, M., Tafazoli, E., Eshghi, S., Rahemi, M. and Rajaee, S. (2007) Salinity, Supplementary Calcium and Potassium Effects on Fruit Yield and Quality of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural &amp; Environmental Sciences, 2, 539-544.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Medhi, R.P., Singh, B. and Parthasarathy, V.S. (1990) Effect of N, P and K on Chilies. Progressive Horticulture, 22,173-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ananthi, S., Veeragavathatham, O. and Srinivasan, K. (2004) Comparative Efficacy of Mutriate of Potash and Sulphate of Potash on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Chili (Capsicum annuum L). South Indian Horticulture, 5291, 158-163.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marschner, H. (2012) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 3rd Edition, Academic Press, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kazemi</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>Effect of Gibberellic Acid and Potassium Nitrate Spray on Vegetative Growth and Reproductive Characteristics of Tomato</article-title><source> Journal of Biological &amp; Environmental Sciences</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>9</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maynard</surname><given-names> D.N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1962</year>)<article-title>Influence of Nitrogen Levels on Flowering and Fruit Set of Peppers</article-title><source> Proceedings of American Society for Horticulture Science</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 385</fpage>-<lpage>389</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaya, C., Higgs, D., Saltali, K. and Gezerel, O. (2002) Response of Strawberry Grown at High Salinity and Alkalinity to Supplementary Potassium. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 25, 1415-1427. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120005399</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yagmur, B., Okur, B. and Ongun, B. (2004) Effects on Enhanced Potassium Doses on Yield Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Tomato. IPI Regional Workshop on Potassium and Fertigation Development in West Asia and North Africa, Rabat, November 2004, 24-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y.T., Liu, R.L., Huang, S.W. and Jin, J.Y. (2009) Effects of Potassium Application on Flavor Compounds of Cherry Tomato Fruits. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32, 1451-1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160903092663</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zelelew, D., Lal, S., Kidane, T. and Ghebreslassie, B. (2016) Effect of Potassium Levels on Growth and Productivity of Potato Varieties. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 7, 1629-1638. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.712154</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, H., Sajid, M., Ullah, R., Hayat, S. and Shahab, M. (2014) Dose Optimization of Potassium (K) for Yield and Quality Increment of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch) Chandler. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 4, 1526-1535. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2014/10989</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, X.S., Ye, S.Y., Wang, W.J., Zhu, H.B., Xu, J. and Wu, L.S. (2004) Effect of Different K Sources and Rates on the Yield and Quality of Cucumber. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 10, 292-297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, Z.J., Zhang, G.L., Zhang, G.W., Ma, L. and Tong, Y. (2002) Effect of Potash Application on the Output and Quality of Kiwifruit in Loess Area. Journal of Fruit Science, 19, 163-166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ni, W.Z., Liang, J.S. and Hardter, R. (2001) Yield and Quality Responses of Selected Solanaceous Vegetable Crops to Potassium Fertilization. Pedosphere, 11, 251-255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Si, S.K.G., Bellal, M. and Halladj, F. (2007) Effect of Potassium Supply on the Behaviour of Two Processing Tomato Cultivars and on the Changes of Fruit Technological Characteristics. Acta Horticulturae, 758, 269-274.  
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.758.32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>El-Masry</surname><given-names> T.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality Response in Sweet Pepper to Varying Rates of Potassium Fertilization and Different Concentrations of Paclobutrazol Foliar Application</article-title><source> Annals of Agricultural Sciences</source><volume> 38</volume>,<fpage> 1147</fpage>-<lpage>1157</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, M., Zheng, Q., Shen, Q. and Guo, S. (2013) The Critical Role of Potassium in Plant Stress Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14, 7370-7390.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14047370</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cakmak, I. (2005) The Role of Potassium in Alleviating Detrimental Effects of Abiotic Stresses in Plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168, 521-530.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420485</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodas, C.L., Pereira da Silva, I., Toledo-Coelho, V.A., Guimar&amp;#227;es-Ferreira, D.M., de Souza, R.J. and Guedes de Carvalho, J. (2013) Chemical Properties and Rates of External Color of Strawberry Fruits Grown Using Nitrogen and Potassium Fertigation. Idesia (Arica), 31, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292013000100007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Nemr, M.A., Abd El-Baky, M.M.H., Salman, S.R. and El-Tohamy, W.A. (2012) Effect of Different Potassium Levels on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Tomato Grown in Sand-Phonic Culture. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6, 779-784.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119823-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Awad-Allah, E., Attia, M. and Mahdy, A. (2020) Salinity Stress Alleviation by Foliar Bio-Stimulant, Proline and Potassium Nutrition Promotes Growth and Yield Quality of Garlic Plant. Open Journal of Soil Science, 10, 443-458.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2020.109023</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>