<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JTTs</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Transportation Technologies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0473</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jtts.2022.124040</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JTTs-119810</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Calibration and Confidence in Snowplow Fleet Operations and Fleet Telematics
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Justin</surname><given-names>Anthony Mahlberg</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jairaj</surname><given-names>Desai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Howell</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rahul</surname><given-names>Suryakant Sakhare</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Timothy</surname><given-names>Wells</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Darcy</surname><given-names>Michael Bullock</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Indiana Department of Transportation, West Lafayette, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>696</fpage><lpage>710</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) spends approximately $30 to $60 million a year on deicing salt and operates a fleet of 1,000 winter operations trucks distributed among 140 locations. The entire fleet is now instrumented with location telematics, and all new trucks have integrated dash cameras, salt spreader application rate and plow up/plow down integrated into the telematics link. When winter storms occur, they have varying region
  al impact
  s
   and INDOT monitors several data sources including National
   Weather Service (NWS) live doppler, National Severe Storms Laboratory’s (NSSL) Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) products, road weather monitoring stations, and connected vehicles (CV) that provide roadway segment operating speeds. This paper discusses how telematics ha
  s
   been integrated to provide a comprehensive view of conditions, truck asset locations, and material distribution maps. The telematics identified widely varying salt spreader rates for the same calibration settings and equipment in preliminary analysis. A calibration box is developed to allow offload calibration to occur within 10 minutes without weighing or transporting the fleet vehicle. The method is deployed across six districts at INDOT for over 1000 snowplows. A sampling of eight trucks in the fleet found the proposed calibration method reduced salt application on average of 45%. This paper describes a series of telematics dashboards for managing winter operations and details the methods developed for 140 geographically distributed truck units to conduct simple, fast, and effective calibration.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Telematics</kwd><kwd> Winter Operations</kwd><kwd> Snowplows</kwd><kwd> Weather</kwd><kwd> Calibration</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Road Weather Management Program estimates that agencies in the United States spend upwards of $2 billion annually on their winter maintenance operations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref1">1</xref>]. The Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) spends approximately $30 to $60 million a year on deicing salt and operates a fleet of 1000 winter operations trucks distributed across 140 units in the state. This fleet is managed and operated by approximately 2000 staff and covers approximately 29,000 lane miles of roadways [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Recent advances in the availability of traffic data, weather models, and telematics technology coupled with an increase in widespread affordability and accessibility have enabled agencies, including INDOT, to instrument their fleet of maintenance vehicles and utilize statewide tracking dashboards to better monitor and assess the effectiveness of roadway maintenance operations in near real-time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref5">5</xref>]. The statewide integration of a Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) into its planning operations in the winter of 2008-2009 helped INDOT save nearly $12 million by reducing salt usage by 40.9 percent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref6">6</xref>]. Additionally, INDOT operates 33 Road Weather Information Systems (RWIS) that help it better anticipate an impending winter storm event, pre-treat roadways well in advance of the first precipitation event and thus help save on material costs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref7">7</xref>]. INDOT also has been utilizing LiDAR-based mobile/portable infrastructure to accurately monitor salt usage during the winter storm season to better estimate current and future material demand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>With increased reliance on accurate data for decision-making, it is of utmost importance for agencies to maintain strong institutional practices of sensor calibration as on-board sensors operating in harsh winter weather conditions may be prone to failure and require regular recalibration. This ensures accurate and repeatable measurements and subsequently improves confidence in an agency’s day-to-day operations.</p><p>The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 provides motivation behind this research; the implementation and use of telematics on snowplows are introduced in Section 3; Section 4 covers opportunities to scale fleet operations and calibration by telematics; calibration procedure, practices, and fleetwide implementation are discussed in Section 5 and Section 6, respectively; and finally, a summary of the study conclusions and recommendations for future research are provided in Section 7.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Motivation</title><p>Over 70% of the population in the US lives in an area that experiences winter weather. To ensure motorist safety and uninterrupted roadway mobility, many agencies use de-icing salt to mitigate impact of winter weather on road travel and accelerate recovery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref10">10</xref>]. Winter storm conditions often rapidly deteriorate as a storm progress thus making it difficult for agencies to maintain level of service if accurate data is not provided at the beginning of a storm. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) shows night snow-covered roadways, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b) shows daytime blowing</p><p>conditions, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c) shows daytime wet-pavement, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d) shows a dash camera image from a snowplow during a winter storm event in Indiana. These photos illustrate just a few examples of different conditions motorists and agencies manage during a winter storm.</p><p>Salt application amounts depend on many variables including duration of storm, precipitation rate and intensity, ambient and pavement temperature, among other factors. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> below shows nationwide salt usage and cost per ton of salt expended by states for the 2018-2019 winter season, with Indiana alone accounting for almost 309,000 tons of salt. With annual salt expenditures in the $30 to $60 million range, it is important for agencies to have systematic and scalable techniques for monitoring salt usage. Furthermore, as agencies seek to incorporate sustainable practices, accurately tracking salt usage, particularly in sensitive water sheds, becomes very important.</p><p>INDOT annual salt expenditures for the past 5 seasons are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref12">12</xref>]. Improved efficiencies in the application process can dramatically impact expenditure in an agency’s road salt budget.</p><p>Agencies can ensure efficient material application through a properly calibrated fleet. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> below shows an example of salt residue observed on the roadway after a winter storm event. Although exact cause of this excess salt is not clear, this often occurs when the hydraulic driven salt spreader on the truck is not properly calibrated. In addition to being costly, creating unnecessary environmental impact, it also can make viewing the lane lines difficult for both human drivers and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) that rely on detecting lane markings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref13">13</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Annual INDOT fiscal year road salt cost</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total Salt Costs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2017-2018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >$30,590,000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2018-2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >$41,719,000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2019-2020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >$56,367,000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2020-2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >$46,352,000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021-2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >$43,015,000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The Ohio Department of Transportation found the accuracy for bed scale sensors embedded on its snowplows varied from 2.2% to 8.4% for calibrated and uncalibrated sensors respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref14">14</xref>]. It is imperative for a snowplow to disperse the optimal amount of material at a given speed to prevent resource waste as well as over-application resulting in hazardous travel conditions for motorists. Studies have observed that a mere 5-mile increase in snowplow speed over the prescribed value could results in a 66% loss in material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Dashboards for Monitoring Fleet Deployment and Mobility Impacts</title><p>The use of telematics on snowplows provides valuable insight for systemwide deployment and monitoring. Merging real-time truck telematics, dash camera imagery, crowdsourced traffic speeds, and high-resolution National Weather Service (NWS) data provides decision makers with the ability to make data-driven resource allocation decisions during a winter storm event. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> below shows an integrated web interface of these data sources utilized by INDOT with doppler reflectivity, interstate traffic speeds, snowplow locations (solid blue circles), and salt application rates as light blue lines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref3">3</xref>]. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) shows the beginning of a winter storm event on February 2nd, 2022, at 12:00 am. Callout i refers to a snowplow operating on I-65 and at that moment in time there were 82 trucks deployed statewide. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) shows conditions as of 6:00 pm on February 3rd, 2022, and at this moment there is a clearly discernible statewide impact of winter weather in response to which 530 trucks were deployed. This dashboard integrates multiple data sources to provide a holistic view of the winter storm impact in real-time, which can enable decision makers to allocate resources in an efficient manner.</p><p>After a winter storm event, district and agency-level after-action reports can be created to determine systemwide impact and strategize future deployment. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) below shows the number of miles of interstate operating below 45 miles per hour and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) shows the number of trucks deployed each hour. The four visible peaks each represent a winter storm event from January 31st, 2022, to February 28th, 2022 (callout i - iv), callout i had the most impact statewide with over 1000 miles of interstate impacted and 851 unique trucks deployed. Callout iii shows a winter storm event that had the greatest impact on the La Porte district.</p><p>For an agency to be able to mitigate winter storm impacts, it is important to have a properly calibrated and functioning fleet of snowplows. A well calibrated snowplow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) should have consistent flow of material while applying (callout i) and should be able to distribute material to cover the entire travel lane (callout ii) and consider ice hazards on bridges (callout iii).</p><p>Due to the varying conditions of a snow storm the application amount may vary dynamically over the course of a storm. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref> is a salt application and action table that recommends an application rate based on pavement temperature and weather conditions provided by the New Hampshire Best Management Practices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref16">16</xref>]. It should be noted that once pavement temperature drops below 15 degrees Fahrenheit, salt application is not recommended as its effectiveness drastically decreases.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Recommended application rates for deicing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pavement Temp. (˚F) and Trend (↑↓)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Weather Condition</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Maintenance Actions</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Application Rate Dry Salt (lbs/per lane mile)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Snow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Freezing Rain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apply Materials Intersection Only</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apply Materials All Routes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&gt;30 ↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >30 ↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >25 - 30 ↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225 - 275</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >25 - 30 ↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275 - 300</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 25 ↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275 - 300</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >20 - 25 ↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 - 325</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325 - 400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >15 - 20 ↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325 - 400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 20 ↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 to 15 ↑↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not recommended</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >✓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not recommended</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: pass the salt: efficient snow &amp; ice management 2018. https://www.uvm.edu/seagrant/sites/default/files/uploads/Santoso_GreenSnowProHandouts_sm.pdf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119810-ref16">16</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Early Implementation Opportunities Identified by Telematics</title><p>Current means of snowplow sensor calibration require scales to weigh the truck before and after calibration or determine offloaded salt amounts through other means. This process can take upwards of 1 - 2 hours and can be expensive to scale for a fleet of 1000 trucks. The new method proposed in the next section eliminates the need for weighing the truck altogether and reduces the time needed to calibrate to 10 minutes.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Calibration Protocol</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Legacy Methods</title><p>INDOT fleet of over 1000 snowplows with varying types of spreader controllers, and material spreading mechanisms. Even the same type of controller and spreader may have slight variations in calibration techniques and spread rates. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a) below shows a V-box salt spreader with a conveyor belt. Callout i refers to three inches of salt that is offloaded from this truck. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b) shows another V-box with a conveyor belt and callout ii shows two inches offloaded. These trucks have identical spreader controllers and have the same calibration inputs, but at a designated rate of 250 lbs per mile the yellow truck (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a)) will apply more material than the silver truck (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)). This difference reveals the need for calibration and standard practices, including gate height.</p><p>The standard calibration methods provided by controller manufacturers have three steps that include calibrating the spinner/auger (if equipped), the offload amount, and the speed of the vehicle. These three components provide a system calibration that ensures driving at various speeds on the roadway that the system offputs the correct amount of material. The most time-consuming part of calibration is the offload amount as it requires running the system until almost a ton of material is offloaded and then determining the amount of material offloaded. One method can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a), which is measuring the truck before offloading, offloading the truck, and reweighing the truck afterwards. This method</p><p>is time and labor intensive as many facilities do not have scales on-site and requires driving to the nearest weigh station before and after offloading. Another way is to have local law enforcement assist with their scales on-site. Aside from weighing the truck an alternative method is shoveling the salt into a container and counting or weighing each container to get the total offload amount (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). These methods are both very time consuming and labor intensive.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Proposed Calibration Method</title><p>A novel volumetric-based calibration procedure was developed to reduce calibration time, increase scalability, and reduce cost for agencies. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> shows the prototype (i.e. “calibration box”), a bottomless box constructed out of aluminum sign backing that holds a known volume and assumed weight accounting for the moisture content of the salt. The offload calibration determines the weight of the truck before and after offload and inputs the offloaded amount into the controller. The calibration box eliminates the need for weighing the truck, allowing agencies to calibrate a truck in less than 10 minutes.</p><p>Use of the calibration box can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 below. The procedure begins with <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a) where the salt is offloading into the box. Once the box is full the offloading stops, and the operator must level the salt to ensure it is full (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(b)). The operator can then input the offload amount into the controller and remove the calibration box (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(c)). Once the offload calibration is complete the operator can complete the final step of the calibration process which is the speed calibration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(d)). A complete training guide that was developed for implementation can be found in TableA1 in the Appendix.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Implementation and Discussion</title><p>To aid in the new calibration procedure, training sessions conducted over six workshops were held in each district of INDOT. Table3 below shows the date of the calibration workshop in each district and the number of trucks from each district. The calibration workshops had over 200 INDOT employees in attendance. Handouts, videos, and other training materials were developed to aid in calibration which was then applied to INDOT’s fleet of over 1000 snowplows. The training material provided is listed in TableA1.</p><p>The calibration workshops calibrated the complete system of the snowplow with a focus on calibrating the offload amount using the calibration box. While conducting these training sessions, the initial calibration inputs were noted and after the offload calibration the same calibration value was recorded. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref> shows a summary of 8 trucks and their initial calibration value, the post calibration value, and the percent change of offload material. These values were taken directly from the manufacturer controller and for 7 out of the 8 trucks the percent change in offload amount reduced by over 45%. This reduction amounts to a significant reduction in costs and material usage for the agency when scaled statewide.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref></label><caption><title> Calibration workshop trainings</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Date</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >District</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Trucks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10/06/2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seymour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10/08/2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fort Wayne</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10/13/2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Greenfield</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10/15/2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >La Porte</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10/20/2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vincennes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10/27/2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crawfordsville</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref></label><caption><title> INDOT spreader controller calibration values</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Truck Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Before Calibration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >After Calibration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Change in Salt Application</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61,208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−52.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >64,377</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−49.7%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >63,536</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−52.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >64,124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−46.5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >66,641</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−51.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >62,457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−53.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61,004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−17.4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >64,056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−43.2%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusions and Future Scope</title><p>This study showed the use of fleet telematics to monitor winter weather maintenance activities and discussed the importance of both telematics and well-calibrated systems to effectively allocate assets and resources. A calibration box was prototyped which allowed offload calibration to occur within 10 minutes without weighing or transporting the fleet vehicle. The method was deployed across six districts at INDOT for over 1000 snowplows. A sampling of eight trucks in the fleet found the proposed calibration method reduced salt application on average of 45%.</p><p>Calibrating the trucks enabled the accurate monitoring of application rates and increased confidence in the data for decision making. These results and implementation suggest the proposed calibration method is effective and can be utilized by agencies to calibrate their equipment. Longer-term continued calibration material and training will ensure knowledge transfer and enable agencies to effectively reduce winter mobility impacts while being environmentally responsible with material application. Additionally, further research on identifying telematics use cases and implementation should be considered for developing fleet utilization metrics, resource allocation and redeployment during a winter storm event.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the Joint Transportation Research Program and the Indiana Department of Transportation. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the sponsoring organizations or data vendors. These contents do not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mahlberg, J.A., Desai, J., Li, H., Sakhare, R.S., Wells, T. and Bullock, D.M. (2022) Calibration and Confidence in Snowplow Fleet Operations and Fleet Telematics. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 12, 696-710. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2022.124040</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Appendix</title><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A1</label><caption><title> Calibration training resources</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Title</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Link</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calibration Workshop Training Time-lapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >https://doi.org/10.4231/XBET-8A88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >How to Calibrate the Volumetric Box</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >https://doi.org/10.4231/RNV9-8F21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muncie Advantage + Controller Calibration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >https://doi.org/10.4231/9S3K-9J39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muncie Omni Controller Calibration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >https://doi.org/10.4231/CRCY-FF55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Certified Power Freedom 2 Controller Calibration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >https://doi.org/10.4231/7015-1X74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FORCE America 5100ex Controller</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >https://doi.org/10.4231/NEY0-9F04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10/06/2021 Seymour Calibration Workshop</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >https://youtu.be/1pZQSHcoMhc</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119810-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Federal Highway Administration [FHWA] (2021) FHWA Road Weather Management—Winter Maintenance Virtual Clearinghouse: Technical Briefs. Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Indiana Department of Transportation (2018) INDOT: Winter Operations. Indiana Department of Transportation.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Desai, J., Mahlberg, J., Kim, W., Sakhare, R., Li, H., McGuffey, J. and Bullock, D.M. (2021) Leveraging Telematics for Winter Operations Performance Measures and Tactical Adjustment. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 11, 611-627. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2021.114038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Desai, J., Mathew, J.K., Kim, W., Liu, M., Li, H., Brooks, J.D. and Bullock, D.M. (2020) Dashboards for Real-Time Monitoring of Winter Operations Activities and After-Action Assessment. JTRP Affiliated Reports, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Paper No. 33. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317252</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahlberg, J., Zhang, Y., Sneha, J., Mathew, J.K., Li, H., Desai, J., Kim, W., Mcguffey, J., Krogmeier, J.V. and Bullock, D.M. (2021) Development of an Intelligent Snowplow Truck That Integrates Telematics Technology, Roadway Sensors, and Connected Vehicle. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Joint Transportation Research Program Publication No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2021/27. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317355</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McClellan, T., Coleman, M., Boone, P. and Carpenter, K. (2009) Implementing a Winter Maintenance Decision Support System: Indiana Department of Transportation’s Process, Success, and Savings. TR News, No. 265, 35-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Indiana Department of Transportation (n.d.) Innovative Operations. Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manish, R., Hasheminasab, S.M., Liu, J., Koshan, Y., Mahlberg, J.A., Lin, Y.C., Ravi, R., Zhou, T., McGuffey, J., Wells, T., Bullock, D. and Habib, A. (2022) Image-Aided LiDAR Mapping Platform and Data Processing Strategy for Stockpile Volume Estimation. Remote Sensing, 14, Article No. 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hintz, W.D., Fay, L. and Relyea, R.A. (2022) Road Salts, Human Safety, and the Rising Salinity of Our Fresh Waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 20, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2433</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U.S. Department of Transportation [USDOT] (n.d.) Snow &amp; Ice. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/weather/weather_events/snow_ice.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clear Roads (2021) Annual Survey of State Winter Maintenance Data. https://clearroads.org/winter-maintenance-survey/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Indiana Road Salt Program, Indiana Department of Administration (2022) 2021-2022 State of Indiana Road Salt QPAs. https://www.in.gov/idoa/procurement/active-contracts-and-qpas/qpa-supplemental-information/indiana-road-salt-program/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahlberg, J.A., Sakhare, R.S., Li, H., Mathew, J.K., Bullock, D.M. and Surnilla, G.C. (2021) Prioritizing Roadway Pavement Marking Maintenance Using Lane Keep Assist Sensor Data. Sensors, 21, Article No. 6014. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, C.M. (2016) 16-1916: Quantitative Assessment of Snow Plow Sensor Failure Impacts on Winter Maintenance Operations.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wasstrom</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Before the Storm: Knowing How and When to Apply Salt and Other Chemicals Makes Crews More Effective Once the Snow Flies</article-title><source> Public Works</source><volume> 138</volume>,<fpage> 28</fpage>-<lpage>30</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119810-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">New Hampshire DOT and New Hampshire LTAP (2018) Pass the Salt: Efficient Snow &amp; Ice Management.https://www.uvm.edu/seagrant/sites/default/files/uploads/Santoso_GreenSnowProHandouts_sm.pdf</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>