<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2022.129076</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-119720</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Knowledge and Attitude of Nurse-Midwives Regarding Maternal Health Care Quality Standards in Two Regional Teaching and Referral Hospitals in Kenya
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Domisiano</surname><given-names>Koome Impwii</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lucy</surname><given-names>Kivuti-Bitok</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anna</surname><given-names>Karani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Nursing Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Nursing and Public Health, Chuka University, Chuka, Kenya</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>914</fpage><lpage>926</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction
  : Maternal mortality remains a major health concern in Sub-Saharan Africa and Kenya in particular. Providing quality maternal health care has the potential of preventing over 75% of maternal deaths. The quality of maternal health care requires the utilization of maternal health care quality standards. <b>Objectives</b>: The objective of this study was to determine the nurse-midwives knowledge and attitude toward the use of maternal health care quality standards. <b>Methodology</b>: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey carried out at Embu and Meru teaching and referral hospitals in Kenya, between August and December 2021. Eighty-five nurse-midwives working in the maternity unit participated in the study. Data was collected using a self-administered semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 27.0. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Chi-square at Alpha level of 0.05 were used to test the relationship between the variables which were the nurse-midwives knowledge, attitude, and use of the quality standards. <b>Result</b>: Most (84.7%, n = 72) nurse-midwives were female and 44.7% (n = 38) were aged 20 - 29 years. Majority (64.7%, n = 55) 
  were diploma holders 
  and almost half (44.7%, n = 38) had practiced for 1 - 9 years. The average score for knowledge was 5.0 with 69.4% (n = 59) having a score of &lt;7. Most nurse midwives (88.2%, n = 75) supported the use of the standards even though only 67.1% (n = 57) indicated that they use them. The support for the standards is significantly related to the gender of the respondents and their duration 
  in
   maternity. There was no significant association between knowledge and use of maternal health care quality standards (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.433, r = -0.085). There is no association between support for the standards and their use (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.008). Knowledge and attitude toward the maternal health care quality standards are not significantly associated (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.156). <b>Conclusion</b>: The knowledge and attitude of the nurse-midwife 
  neither
   influence each other nor do they influence the use of maternal health care quality standards.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Maternal Health Care</kwd><kwd> Quality</kwd><kwd> Standards</kwd><kwd> Nurse-Midwife</kwd><kwd> Kenya</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>World Health Organization (WHO) defines maternal death as “a death occurring in a woman during pregnancy or within 42 days after delivery or miscarriage the location and gestation notwithstanding, as long as it is due to factors that are related to or worsened by pregnancy or its management but not due to accidental or incidental causes” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref1">1</xref>]. In 2017, 295,000 maternal deaths occurred globally out of which about two-thirds (66%) occurred in sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Although there has been a reduction in maternal mortality ratio (MMR) over the years since the year 2000, the level is still below that envisioned in the sustainable development goal target 3.1 of reducing MMR to less than 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref2">2</xref>]. In Kenya, the current MMR is 362 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, which is way below the target of 147 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref3">3</xref>]. More than half of the maternal deaths arise from hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, and sepsis which are preventable through use of appropriate strategies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>One of the strategies that have been adopted in Kenya is increasing access to skilled attendants through the introduction of maternity services free of charge by the government in June, 2013. This covered all public health facilities across the country and increased the number of facility based deliveries by 26.8% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref6">6</xref>]. However, increasing access alone may not be adequate in achieving the desired maternal health outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref7">7</xref>]. Indeed, a review of 2014 maternal death case notes in Kenya found that in 75.4% of the cases one or more health worker-related factors were to blame [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Quality maternal health care can be accomplished through the use of maternal and newborn care guidelines detailing best practices that are known to produce desirable outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref9">9</xref>]. One such guideline is the “Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities” developed by WHO in 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref10">10</xref>]. This document has a set of standards containing eight domains of quality of care to guide health facilities in assessing and continually improving the quality of care provided [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>In Kenya, 61% of the deliveries occur in a health facility and 46% occur in a public sector facility. Targeting the nurse-midwives is likely to produce favorable outcomes in maternal health care since they conduct seventy percent of deliveries in public sector facilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref3">3</xref>]. This study thus sought to determine the knowledge and attitude of nurse-midwives regarding the use of maternal health care standards and guidelines which are some of the factors that may influence their utilization.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>This study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey that was carried out between August and December 2021 at the Maternity units of Embu and Meru Level 5 Teaching and referral hospitals in Kenya.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Population</title><p>Participants were all nurse-midwives who were currently working at the maternity units and had been working there for at least six months. At the time of the study, there were a total of fifty-five and fifty nurse-midwives in Embu and Meru Teaching and referral hospitals’ maternity units respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sample Size and Sampling Procedure</title><p>Cochran’s (1967) formula for proportions was used to calculate the sample size resulting in a target of 83 nurse-nurse midwives. Ten percent of the participants were added to cater for non-responses taking the sample size to 93. Stratified random sampling was used to select the sample representatives.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Research Instruments</title><p>A quantitative, self -administered semi-structured questionnaire was developed and administered to assess the knowledge and attitude of Nurse-midwives regarding the WHO/national maternal health care quality standards. Questions on knowledge focused on infection prevention practices, and active management of the 3<sup>rd</sup> stage as well as management of postpartum hemorrhage and hypertension in pregnancy. Attitude questions focused on the support for the use of the standards and the reasons for or against their use. The questionnaire was pretested at Chuka level 4 Hospital and adjustments made as per the findings.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0. Nurse-midwives level of knowledge, attitude, and use of maternal health care quality standards were determined. Knowledge scores for each participant were calculated. Those who scored 7 and above were considered to have adequate knowledge and those who scored &lt; 7 were grouped as having inadequate knowledge. Those who supported the use of maternal health care quality standards were considered to have a positive attitude. Association between variables was tested using Pearson correlation analysis and a Chi-square test at Alpha level of 0.05 (5%).</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Scope of the Study</title><p>The study focused mainly on the WHO (2016) Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities. Out of these, the study concentrated on the standards that apply to labor, delivery, and the immediate postpartum period.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Ethical Approval and Permission</title><p>Ethical approval was granted by Kenyatta National Hospital and the University of Nairobi ethics and research committee vide KNH-ERC/E/468 as well as National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI). Administrative approval was given by the County Health Committee. Written approval was sought from the Health facility managers. The participants were requested to fill in a consent form before participating in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Abbreviations and Acronyms</title><p>KNH: Kenyatta National Hospital</p><p>MMR: Maternal Mortality Ratio</p><p>NACOSTI: National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation</p><p>SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences</p><p>WHO: World Health Organization</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Demographic Characteristics</title><p>Ninety-three nurse-midwives were recruited for the study out of which 85 participants responded, a response rate of 91%. Out of these participating nurse-midwives, forty-five (52.9%) and forty (47.5%) were working at Embu and Meru level 5 Teaching and referral hospitals respectively. Most (84.7%, n = 72) nurse-midwives were female, 44.7% (n = 38) were aged 20 - 29 years and 57. 6% (n = 38) were married. The majority (64.7%, n = 55) of nurse-midwives were protestants and 64.7% (n = 55) were diploma holders with only two participants having a certificate qualification (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Almost half (41%, n = 35) were working in the labor ward and most (44.7%, n = 38) had practiced for 1 - 9 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Nurse Midwives Use of Maternal Health Care Quality Standards</title><p>Fifty-seven (67.1%) nurse-midwives indicated that they used maternal health care quality standards in their practice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). There was no significant association between the nurse-midwives’ demographic characteristics and the use of the standards (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Nurse-Midwives Knowledge about Maternal Health Care Quality Standards</title><p>Only 42.4% (n = 36) of nurse-midwives indicated correctly that quality maternal</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Nurse-midwives demographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Socio-demographic Characteristics of Nurse Midwives</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Category</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Marital Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Never married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced/separated/widowed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catholic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protestant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muslim</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Qualification Level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Certificate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diploma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Degree and above</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Facility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Embu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meru</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Nurse-Midwives years of experience</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse-midwives Years of Experience</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 1 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 9 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 19 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 years and above</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between nurse-midwives’ demographic characteristics and use of maternal health care quality standards</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse-midwives’ use of maternal health care quality standards</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.276</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Highest qualification level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.168</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.124</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Years of experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.167</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.127</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Period in maternity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.278</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Training on maternal health care standards</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.647</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>health care is the care that meets the health care standards. Most (61.2%, n = 52) midwives had not been trained on maternal health care quality standards. Out of those trained, 39.4% (n = 13) were trained in college (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The average knowledge score for the maternal health care quality standards was 5.0 though individual average scores varied from between 4 and 8. Most (69.4%, n = 59) had a score of &lt;7 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The association between the participants’ socio-demographic characteristics and their knowledge of the standards was not significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Relationship between Knowledge and Use of Maternal Health Care Quality Standards</title><p>There was no significant relationship between nurse-midwives knowledge and use of maternal health care quality standards (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.433) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Knowledge about maternal health care quality standards</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Category</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >What is quality maternal health care?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Care that makes the clients happy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Care that delivers value for money</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Care that meets the needs of the clients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Care that meets the laid down standards of care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Have you ever been trained on the use of maternal health care standards?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Trainer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >College</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NGO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hospital Management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >County Health Team</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Maternal health care quality standards knowledge scores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between knowledge of maternal health care quality standards and participants’ demographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge about maternal health care standards</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.509</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Highest qualification level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Years of experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.774</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Period in maternity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0211</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.362</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between knowledge and use of maternal health care quality standards</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exact Sig. (2-sided)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exact Sig. (1-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.614<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.433</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Continuity Correction<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Likelihood Ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fisher’s Exact Test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.300</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linear-by-Linear Association</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.607</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N of Valid Cases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Nurse-Midwives’ Attitude towards Maternal Health Care Quality Standards</title><p>Majority (88.2%, n = 75) of the participants indicated support for the use of maternal health care standards with only ten participants (11.8%) not supporting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Among those supporting, half (50.7%, n = 38) did so since the maternal health care standards standardize the care provided. Out of the ten participants who don’t support the use of maternal health standards, seven (70%) indicated that the standards would be time-consuming (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. The Relationship between Nurse-Midwives’ Attitude towards the Use of Maternal Health Care Quality Standards and Demographic Characteristics</title><p>There is a significant association between nurse-midwives gender, the period in maternity, and support for the use of maternal health care standards at r = 0.251 and r = −0.242 respectively. The other demographic characteristics are not significantly associated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Relationship between Nurse-Midwives Knowledge, Attitude, and Use of the Maternal Health Care Quality Standards</title><p>Support for the standards is not significantly influenced by the nurse-midwives knowledge about the standards (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.156) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>). There was no relationship between the support for and use of the standards (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.008) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Nurse-midwives attitude toward the use of maternal health care quality standards</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Category</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Do you support the use of Maternal health care standards?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Reason for supporting the use of maternal health care standards</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Care standardization</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Makes work easier</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ensure quality of care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Reasons for opposing the use of maternal health care standards?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Time-consuming</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >staff are highly qualified</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Requires a lot of resources</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between nurse-midwives’ attitude towards the use of maternal health care standards and demographic characteristics and knowledge</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse midwives support for use of maternal health care standards</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.251*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.205</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.060</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Marital Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.676</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Period in Maternity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.242*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Length of Practice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.162</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.139</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Training on Maternal Health Care Standards</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.812</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between nurse-midwives’ knowledge and attitude toward the use of maternal health care quality standards</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exact Sig. (2-sided)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exact Sig. (1-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.011<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Continuity Correction<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Likelihood Ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.874</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fisher’s Exact Test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.146</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linear-by-Linear Association</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.988</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N of Valid Cases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Relationship between nurse-midwives attitude and use of maternal health care quality standards</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exact Sig. (2-sided)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exact Sig. (1-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.046<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Continuity Correction<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Likelihood Ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fisher’s Exact Test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linear-by-Linear Association</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.963</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N of Valid Cases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In this study, majority of the participants (84.7%) were females and most of them were married. This finding may be because nursing originated as a caring profession. In most cases, it is the women who are involved in caring for the sick. This is consistent with a study finding by Ndirangu et al. that the majority of the nurse-midwives are female [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref11">11</xref>]. Regarding the age of the participants, the majority of the participants were aged between 20 - 29 years. This might be due to the deployment pattern in the hospital. Maternity being a labor-intensive department the management tends to place younger nurses there since they are considered more energetic. However, this finding differs from the findings of Gitonga which showed that the majority of the nurse-midwives in maternity are aged 30 - 35 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref12">12</xref>]. Most of the participants in this study were diploma holders. This can be explained by the fact that the number of certificate training programs in Kenya decreased as up-grading programs from certificate to diploma were being introduced as well as the presence of many medical training colleges offering diploma training as opposed to those offering degree-level training. This finding is in tandem with that by Tallam et al. who in their study on Midwives’ self-perceived confidence in their knowledge and skills in Kenya indicated that the majority of the participants were diploma holders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref13">13</xref>]. Most of the participants had practiced for between 1 - 9 years. This may be because most of the nurse-midwives deployed in maternity are young.</p><p>Only 42.3% of the participants correctly specified that quality maternal health care is care that met the laid down standards with the majority indicating it refers to care that responds to the needs of the client. This could be due to the lack of training of nurse midwives on maternal health care quality and quality standards. Training in-service nurse-midwives is an important undertaking to ensure that they are abreast with the best practices. Incidentally, this study identified that only 38.8% of the nurse-midwives are trained on the maternal health care standards and most of these were trained in college. Furthermore, only 30.6% demonstrated adequate knowledge about maternal health care standards. This finding concurs with the assertion by WHO et al. that only 18.5% of health care workers are equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to provide quality obstetric care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref14">14</xref>]. Most of the in-service training is carried out by Non-Governmental Organizations which has dwindled since the inception of devolution in Kenya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>The majority of the nurse-midwives interviewed in this study supported the use of maternal health care standards since they standardized the quality of maternal care. This finding is consistent with several other studies such as those by Wahabi et al, Melanie, and Hendaus et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref17">17</xref>]. Most of the participants who do not support the use of the standards indicated that it would be time-consuming. This is maybe because a nurse-midwife is required to follow every step as stipulated in the guidelines. With the current nurse-to-patient ratio of 25:10,000 as opposed to the required ratio of 83:10,000, this becomes an issue. This finding is different from that of Zheng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119720-ref18">18</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The level of knowledge about maternal health care quality standards among nurse-midwives is inadequate though their attitude towards them is positive. There is a need to carry out in-service education and training on maternal health care quality standards and specifically on the use of WHO (2016) standards for improving the quality of maternal health care. Maternal health care standards for quality improvement should also be added as content to the training curricula for diploma and bachelor nursing students.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank Mr. Dan Musau for helping with data analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Impwii, D.K., Kivuti-Bitok, L. and Karani, A. (2022) Knowledge and Attitude of Nurse-Midwives Regarding Maternal Health Care Quality Standards in Two Regional Teaching and Referral Hospitals in Kenya. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12, 914-926. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2022.129076</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119720-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2021) Indicator Metadata Registry.  
https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4622</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and the World Bank (2019) Trends in Maternal Mortality: 2000 to 2017. Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF International (2015) Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014: Key Indicators. Calverton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Say, L., Chou, D., Gemmill, A., Tunalp, &amp;Ouml;., Moller, A.B., Daniels, J. and Alkema, L. (2014) Global Causes of Maternal Death: A WHO Systematic Analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 2, 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Health (MOH) (2015) Implementing Free Maternal Health Care in Kenya: Challenges, Strategies, and Recommendation. Nairobi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njuguna, J., Kamau, N. and Muruka, C. (2017) Impact of Free Delivery Policy on Utilization of Maternal Health Services in County Referral Hospitals in Kenya. BMC Health Services Research, 17, Article No. 429.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2376-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maternal Health Task Force (2017) The Sustainable Development Goals and Maternal Mortality.  
https://www.mhtf.org/topics/the-sustainable-development-goals-and-maternal-mortality</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Health (2017) Saving Mothers Lives: First Confidential Report into Maternal Deaths in Kenya. Nairobi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Austin, A., Langer, A., Salam, R.A., Lassi, Z.S., Das, J.K. and Bhutta, Z.A. (2014) Approaches to Improve the Quality of Maternal and Newborn Health Care: An Overview of the Evidence. Reproductive Health, 11, S1.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2016) Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and New-Born Care in Health Facilities. Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndirangu, E.W., Sarki, A.M., Mbekenga, C., et al. (2021) Professional Image of Nursing and Midwifery in East Africa: An Exploratory Analysis. BMC Nursing, 20, Article No. 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00531-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gitonga, L. (2016) Essential Maternal and Newborn Care Skills Training for Midwives: Their Impact on Reducing Maternal and Neonatal Mortalities in Kenya. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 73-84.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2016.61009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tallam, E., Kaura, D. and Mash, R. (2021) Midwives’ Self-Perceived Confidence in Their Knowledge and Skills in Kenya: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Africa Nursing Science, 16, Article ID: 100387.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2014) Maternal Mortality—To Improve Maternal Health, Barriers That Limit Access to Quality Maternal Health Services Must Be Identified and Addressed at All Levels of the Health System: Fact Sheet.  
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112318/WHO_RHR_14.06_eng.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wahabi, H.A., Alzeidan, R.A., Fayed, A.A., Esmaeil, S.A. and Al Aseri, Z.A. (2011) Attitude and Practice of the Health Care Professionals towards the Clinical Practice Guidelines in King Khalid University Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 763-767.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01694.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Melanie, R.K. (2015) Utilization of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Barriers and Facilitators. Nursing Clinics of North America, 50, 327-345.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2015.03.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hendaus, M.A., Alhammadi, A.H., Razig, E.A. and Alnaimi, L. (2014) Pediatricians’ Perception of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 7, 349-354. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S66147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119720-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, M.Y., Suneja, A., Chou, A.L. and Arya, M. (2014) Physician Barriers to the Successful Implementation of US Preventive Services Task Force Routine HIV Testing Recommendations. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, 13, 200-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325957413514276</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>