Urinary tract infections (UI) are due to the presence of a pathogenic bacterium within the patient’s urinary tract [1]. They are the most common bacterial infections that pose a significant burden on public health, due to their very high frequency, their peak cost of treatment, and multiple treatment failures due to multi-resistance [2]. The bacteria in question are generally Enterobacteriaceae, with Escherichia coli as the main bacterium [3]. UIs are common in both hospital and community settings and affect all age groups (children, adults, and the elderly), with women as the predominant group. They occupy an important place among the reasons for consultation and prescription of antibiotics, second only to respiratory infections [4]. In Mali, Sissoko, during his study on urinary tract infections, obtained a prevalence of 27.6% [5]. In Burkina Faso in 2002, according to a study carried out, using 330 samples at the maternal and child health service of the Saint Camille Hospital, the prevalence of urinary tract infections was 18.5% [6]. In other studies in Burkina Faso, the respective prevalences of 27.5% and 30% have been reported [7] [8]. All these studies show the extent of urinary tract infections. Nowadays, the emergence and dissemination of bacterial resistance pose a public health problem to which Burkina Faso is not immune. The consequence of this phenomenon is an increase in morbidity and mortality. It is therefore necessary to know the bacteria strains frequently isolated in urinary tract infections and their susceptibility to antibiotics. It is with this in mind that this work was initiated in Ouagadougou, precisely at the National Public Health Laboratory (LNSP).

In our study, 56.15% of women had UI compared to 43.85% of men. Women were, therefore, more affected than men. Similar results were reported by Santos et al. in Brazil, who found 79.6% female versus 20.4% male during their study [9]. Also, Benhiba and collaborators in 2015, during their study on the epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of urinary tract infections in Marrakech, observed a sex ratio of F/M = 1.12 [3]. The proximity of the terminal digestive tract and the urogenital system associated with a short urethra could explain the predominance of UTIs in female individuals. In addition, the vagina has commensal flora that could be pathogenic to the urinary tract. Also, wiping the anus behind and forward after defecation promotes infection by germs found in the feces. In addition, not urinating after unprotected sex could be a favorable factor for urinary tract infections [10]. In his same study, Kj and collaborators reported proportions of 72.38% of women who had problems with urinary tract infections compared to 27.32% of men [10]. The same observation was made by Ouédraogo and collaborators in Burkina Faso in 2012, with 55% of women presenting with a urinary tract infection compared to 45% of men [11].

The average age of the patients was 45.64 years. In women, the most affected age groups were those of [30; 45[ and ≥55 years old, and in men, the age group ≥55 was the most affected. Our results are similar to those of Sissoko in 2006 in Mali, who, during their study of urinary tract infections in Bamako, found that the age ranges of [16 - 35] and [36 - 65] in women and the age group of [36 - 60] in men were the most affected [5]. Our results could be explained by the fact that in women, the age groups of 30 and 45 are the most sexually active. There are also certain phenomena that could explain this result, such as pregnancy, the use of contraceptives, and the use of tampons during menstruation, which would increase the risk of urinary tract infection [12]. The high frequency of UI in the age group of 55 years would be linked to the phenomenon of menopause, which would lead to an imbalance of hormonal flow (lack of estrogen), and the loss of lactobacilli in the vaginal flora.

In men, the high frequency of UI in the age group of 55 years is thought to be due to benign prostatic hypertrophy or inflammation that prevents the bladder from emptying completely. During our study, the bacteria identified were Enterobacteriaceaestrains (77.54%). Escherichia coli was the most common (48.66%).

Our findings are consistent with those of Sanou et al. from Burkina Faso, who found 66.67% Enterobacteriaceae, 65.38% E. coli, and 11.53% Klebsiella [13]. Also, our results corroborate those of Kj and collaborators in the DRC, who obtained a high number of Enterobacteriaceae (66.66%) with a predominance of E. coli (40.28%), followed by Enterococcus (15.28%), Staphylococcus aureus (12.04%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.02%).

The ascending physiopathology of UI as well as the strong colonization of the perineum by Enterobacteriaceaestrains of digestive origin, associated with specific factors of uropathogenicity such as bacterial adhesins capable of binding to the urinary epithelium, could explain this predominance [14] [15].

The high frequency of E. coli could be explained by the pathophysiological mechanism of urinary tract infection, occurring essentially by the ascending route. E. coli is the most dominant species in the intestinal flora and can easily migrate to the urinary tract. In addition, E. coli is part of the fecal coliforms, so improper cleaning of the private parts can easily cause the bacteria to enter the urinary tract [10].

Regarding the resistance of Enterobacteriaceae strains to antibiotics, we observed that the isolated strains were in 100% of cases resistant to amoxicillin, to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid in 98.75% of cases, to cefotaxime in 65.77% of cases, and to aztreonam in 57.53% of cases. Our results are similar to those of Lahlou and collaborators [16] in Morocco, who noted a high frequency of resistance of community-acquired and nosocomial Enterobacteriaceae to beta-lactams with respectively 80% and 70% resistance to amoxicillin and amoxicillin + clavulanic acid for community strains and respectively 70% and 90% resistance to amoxicillin and ampicillin for nosocomial strains. Other studies, such as those by Zampaligré in 2012, Taale and collaborators in 2018 in Burkina Faso [7] [17], Touré and collaborators in 2012 in Mali [18], obtained resistance rates of 93.8%, 93.75%, 91%, and 66.67% respectively for E. coli to amoxicillin; and also resistance rates of 80%, 86.67%, 74%, and 23.53%, respectively, of E. coli to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid. These results reflect the extent of the resistance of this bacterium to beta-lactams. In the study by Taale et al., a resistance rate to Klebsiella pneumoniae 100% was obtained for amoxicillin and amoxicillin + clavulanic acid. Regarding the resistance profile of Enterobacteriaceae to cefotaxime and aztreonam in our study, resistance rates of 65.77% and 57.53%, respectively, were obtained.

The high rate of resistance of Enterobacteriaceae strains to beta-lactams is mainly due to the production of beta-lactamases, which constitutes a very effective resistance mechanism. Indeed, beta-lactamases are produced by bacteria that inactivate beta-lactams by hydrolytic action, and this is the most widespread mechanism of bacterial resistance to antibiotics with a beta-lactam nucleus [19]. In addition, the abusive and inappropriate use (self-medication, incomplete treatment, and non-compliance with dosages) of certain antibiotics in developing countries and mainly in our country would contribute to the development of resistance [20] [21]. Indeed, in these countries, it is possible to obtain antibiotics without a medical or veterinary prescription, and patients under the effect of pain resort to self-medication for infections such as rum, cough, and diarrhea.

During our study, imipenem was the most active antibiotic against Enterobacteriaceae strains (91.25%). Resistance rates were 0% and 3.04% for E. cloacae and K. pneumoniae, respectively. In their study, Moutachakkir [22] in Morocco and Zampaligré in Burkina Faso, obtained a resistance rate of 0% and 33.4%, respectively, to imipenem. In Moutachakkir’s study, no resistance (0%) to imipenem was observed with strains of Enterobacter cloacae while a resistance of 2.46% was observed with strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Compared to the behavior of Enterobacteriaceaestrainstoward aminoglycosides, most of the strains tested in our study were less resistant to aminoglycosides (Gentamicin: 25% and Amikacin: 22.59%). Our results are lower than those found by Moutachakkir and collaborators in Marrakech (gentamicin 17% and amikacin 1%) and those found by Zampaligré in Burkina Faso (gentamicin 24.6% and amikacin 95%).

In the present study, the resistance rates of Enterobacteriaceae strains to ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin were 58.98% and 54.05%, respectively. Specifically, a ciprofloxacin resistance rate of 67.05% was obtained with E. coli and 67.85% with norfloxacin. In other studies, low resistance rates to ciprofloxacin were obtained in E. coli [18] [22], i.e., 43% and 12%, respectively. These high rates could be explained by the massive prescription of this molecule in our health facilities. Other authors, such as Vellinga et al., reported in their study in Ireland that ciprofloxacin is the most prescribed molecule [23] in town.

Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella ornithinolytica, and Citrobacter frendii strains showed resistance (100%) to ciprofloxacin. Thus, ciprofloxacin was ineffective against most Enterobacteriaceae. The best activity of this molecule was obtained on Klebsiella pneumoniae (66.67%), Enterobacter cloacae (77.77%), and Morganella morganii strains (50%).

In the present study, a high resistance rate of Enterobacteriaceae strains (75.67%) was obtained to cotrimoxazole.

In relation to these results, one could say that the high resistance rates of Enterobacteriaceae strains to sulfonamides would be due to the fact that this antibiotic is used in the treatment algorithm for opportunistic infections in HIV patients. This could therefore lead to antibiotic misuse [24].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were found to be resistant to imipenem (11.77%), gentamicin (13.34%), norfloxacin (14.29%), ciprofloxacin (18.79%), ceftazidime (94.11%), and cotrimoxazole (66.66%).

As for Acinetobacter baumanii, the strains were resistant to cotrimoxazole (14.29%), ciprofloxacin (21.43%), gentamicin (14.29%), and norfloxacin (16.67%).

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics concerns both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. In our study, the gram-positive bacterial strains tested were resistant to penicillin (100%). According to Berger-Bachi, penicillinases are produced by 80% of S. aureus isolates and are the most widely distributed mechanism in the microbial world [25]. As for erythromycin and clindamycin, low resistance rates of 0% and 27.28% were obtained. These results give hope for the treatment of S. aureus infections. In addition, high rates of resistance were obtained during our study (66.66%) with aminoglycosides such as gentamicin and sulfonamides such as cotrimoxazole (100%). It is noted in the light of these results that, contrary to the work of these authors, the Staphylococcus aureus strain has developed resistance to many antibiotics. This could be explained by the anarchic use of antibiotics locally, the poor storage of antibiotics, and the under-dosage of certain antibiotics [10].

Regarding the resistance of Enterococcus (Figure 2), we obtained in our study similar results to those reported by Mebarkia and Daoudi in Algeria in 2016, where they noted high rates of resistance to amoxicillin and erythromycin (42.86% each) [26]. Similarly, these authors noted the good activity of antibiotics such as amikacin, clindamycin, and vancomycin.

At the end of this study, we can identify the limitations at two levels: 1) First, like any retrospective study, there are variables that were not taken into account, such as taking medication; 2) antibiotic resistance genes have not been studied to understand their circulation.

Through our study, we were able to identify the bacteria strains involved in urinary tract infections in patients at the LNSP in Ouagadougou and study their antibiotic susceptibilities. The data showed that the prevalence of urinary tract infections among the patients received at the LNSP was very high, with a predominance of the female sex (sex ratio F/M = 0.78). The most encountered bacteria strains were Enterobacteriaceae, with E. coli and Klebsiella in mind. This study also allowed us to measure the extent of the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance to bacteria isolated in urinary infections. Enterobacteriaceae strains showed strong resistance to beta-lactams, quinolones, and sulfonamides. Cocci also showed strong resistance to clindamycin, kanamycin, and erythromycin.

In view of the alarming problem of the resistance of uropathogens to antibiotics, awareness must be raised. The best ways to fight against urinary tract infections are prevention through population hygiene measures, carrying out antibiotic susceptibility testing before taking care of patients, respecting the prescription of antibiotics, and raising awareness to avoid self-medication at the health center level.

The authors would like to acknowledge the entire patient for their participation in the present study, and the staff of the National Public Health Laboratory (LNSP) of Ouagadougou.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Ouedraogo, S., Kpoda, D.S., Ouattara, L.P., Zongo, C., Hien, Y.E., Karfo, P., Nezien, D., Kabre, E., Pillar, A.B. and Savadogo, A. (2022) Identification of Bacteria Strains Isolated in Urinary Tract Infections and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility at the National Public Health Laboratory, Ouagadougou. Open Journal of Medical Microbiology, 12, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmm.2022.123008