<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8359</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2022.138038</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJG-119587</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Climatic Influences on Upper Carboniferous (Serpukhovian to Mid-Bashkirian) Sedimentary Sequences in the UK Pennine and Other European Basins
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Colin</surname><given-names>Michael Jones</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Cambridge, UK</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>715</fpage><lpage>778</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Upper Carboniferous successions in European sedimentary basins contain
   cyclothems related to glacial cycles of approximately 100
   
  Ky duration. Within the UK Pennine Basin both simple and complex cyclothems are recognized. In the latter, mid-cycle deltas were flooded by sea-level rises, possibly related to short period orbital forcing events. They were followed by late cycle forced regression delta channels and then by incised coarse-grained channels active after the glacial maximum. Other European successions commonly contain coarse incised channel fills in the same cyclothems; these were deposited during colder glacial periods. Simple cyclothems formed during warmer periods contain only lobate mid-cycle deltas. The distribution of different cyclothem types is not random. Correlation with the eastern Australian succession using revised published radiometric dates from Eastern Europe suggests that the early Namurian C1 glaciation in Australia correlates with a group of Pennine complex cycles of late Pendleian to early Arnsbergian age. The C2 glaciation began just prior to the late Kinderscoutian and possibly lasted into the early Langsettian; the Pennine succession shows evidence for a number of colder periods with complex cycles, especially in the late Kinderscoutian and mid Marsdenian. The intervening period, particularly from Alportian to mid Kinderscoutian was warmer.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Carboniferous</kwd><kwd> Climate</kwd><kwd> Glacial</kwd><kwd> Cyclicity</kwd><kwd> Pennines</kwd><kwd> Europe</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>For almost 100 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref1">1</xref>] it has been known that late Paleozoic successions contain glacial deposits. Three glacial periods occurred in the Late Devonian, Mid Tournaisian and mid to late Visean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref2">2</xref>]. A detailed chronology from Eastern Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref4">4</xref>] suggests that from the Serpukhovian to the Moskovian there were four more separate glacial periods, each of no more than up to a few million years’ duration. Ice-age related climatic changes are world-wide in their effects. Carboniferous equatorial cyclothems of North America have been linked to climate and sea-level changes related to the formation and decay of Southern Hemisphere ice sheets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref5">5</xref>]. Increased understanding of Carboniferous equatorial region successions developed from the numerous sedimentology studies of the 1960’s, 70’s and 80’s and more recently sequence stratigraphy, with many studies carried out in North America [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref6">6</xref>] , in the northern England Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref13">13</xref>] , the Ruhr Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>] and the Lublin Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Southern Hemisphere Carboniferous successions with glacial deposits had a relatively poor preservation because they are largely terrestrial. Equatorial successions that developed within continuously subsiding basins have the potential to provide a more complete record of late Paleozoic climate change. Attempts at paleo-climate reconstruction have been made for the Canadian Maritimes Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref18">18</xref>] , where some of the Namurian is missing, the UK Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref19">19</xref>]; and the Donetsk Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>The paper reviews the sedimentary successions of the Namurian and early Langsettian (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) from a number of sedimentary basins in Europe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This is largely based on the existing literature supplemented by fieldwork carried out by the author. By far the most extensively researched succession occurs in the northern England Pennine Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It originated in the early Carboniferous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref22">22</xref>] and contained a number of extensional sub-basins, separated by more slowly subsiding blocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). By Namurian time the whole area was undergoing thermal subsidence. Subsidence rates varied significantly and</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Stratigraphic position of sequence discussed in relation to the North American and wider European stratigraphies, with ages from Davydov et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>successions over some of the blocks continued to be thinner than in the sub-basins. The biostratigraphy is known in great detail with marine bands providing a reliable correlation down to approximately 100,000 years (Section 4.2). The basin extends out into the larger North Sea Basin which has now been penetrated by over 100 gas wells and a selection of these is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. All released well data are available online, including core photographs on the BGS website, although biostratigraphic and sedimentology studies are commonly excluded. General accounts are provided in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>The Ruhr Basin in Germany (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) is a foreland basin with high rates of subsidence in the late Namurian. In the basin centre the Namurian succession is over 3000 m thick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref25">25</xref>] and is mainly known from borehole data, with only limited outcrop exposure. Much of the early Namurian (Serpukhovian) is in non-deltaic basin facies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref26">26</xref>] , but a very detailed biostratigraphic breakdown is available for the overlying deltaic succession from early Marsdenian</p><p>through into the Langsettian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref29">29</xref>] , which allows correlation with the Pennine Basin succession. Although there are only a small number of modern sedimentology and sequence-stratigraphy studies available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>] , high rates of subsidence provide a lot of detail on intra-cycle events, which are less evident in other more slowly subsiding basins. Other sedimentary basins which provide useful data through parts of the sequence include various basins in Ireland, plus sedimentary basins in Scotland. South Wales is a foreland basin with high rates of subsidence towards the late Namurian, which is similar to basins in SW England, France, Belgium, Holland and east Europe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). These are also briefly reviewed.</p><p>The paper also discusses how the sedimentological and faunal data may provide evidence for climate change and associated sea-level changes and how these varied through the period; with possible links to orbital forcing. The western European data are then compared to the published evidence for far-field climate changes in the southern hemisphere and a new correlation between the West European succession and the Australian glacial chronology is proposed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Pleistocene Glaciations as an Analogue for the Carboniferous?</title><p>The chronology of the Pleistocene glaciations is now well established through detailed air temperature changes documented by ice cores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref32">32</xref>] and sea temperature changes estimated using foraminiferal oxygen isotope ratios in deep-ocean cores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref34">34</xref>]. The sea and air temperature data provide indirect evidence for ice sheet accumulation and decay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(A)). Combining these with the sea-level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref35">35</xref>] and ice volume calculations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref36">36</xref>] shows that major glacial periods lasting c100 Ky, with sea-level falls of up to 120m, have only existed for the last 900 Ky [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref37">37</xref>]. Summaries of back-calculations of orbital forcing parameters after [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref43">43</xref>] over the late Pleistocene glacial period</p><p>are shown (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(B) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(C)). The four parameters are: long-eccentricity, approximately 400 Ky, short-eccentricity, approximately 100 Ky; obliquity, which averages 41 Ky and precession, which averages 23 Ky. These back-calculations show an apparent correlation between the short-eccentricity forcing periods (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(C)) and the glacial cycles defined by the temperature data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(A)).</p><p>In spite of the obvious dominance of 100 Ky cycles, short eccentricity (100 Ky) forcing is not strong enough alone to account for the temperature changes seen. Increased modulation of precession over the 100 Ky eccentricity period enhances ablation and hence increased ice melting, whilst decreased modulation allows ice sheets to grow in response to obliquity forcing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref47">47</xref>]. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(A) shows the temperature record for the last glacial cycle, based on the Vostock ice core in Antarctica [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref32">32</xref>]. Although the eccentricity is weaker at the end of the 400</p><p>Ky long-eccentricity cycle, it still shows variations in temperature, with two secondary peaks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(A), arrowed) forming interstadials, which punctuated the longer-term temperature drop culminating in the Late Glacial Maximum (LGM). These temperature fluctuations caused variations in calculated ice volumes and hence sea levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(B)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref47">47</xref>] which relate closely to the total insolation curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(C)). Precessional forcing events, back-calculated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(D), formed a large component of this insolation variation.</p><p>Many of the modern interpretations of Carboniferous sequences are seen through a prism of the recent Pleistocene events, which took place over a period of less than 1 My. This episode was very short in comparison to the 50 My over which the Carboniferous ice ages occurred. Therefore, to what extent is the short late Pleistocene period an analogue for the much longer Carboniferous? Obvious differences between the two periods include the very different disposition of the oceans and continents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref30">30</xref>]; the different locations, extents and elevations of the major ice sheet accumulation areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref49">49</xref>]; the likely higher oxygen content of the Carboniferous atmosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref50">50</xref>]; reduced solar luminosity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref51">51</xref>] and differences in the orbital forcing periods; although these were limited and some parameters can be back-calculated into the Carboniferous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref40">40</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Western European Palaeogeography and Fluvial Systems</title><p>The Western European sedimentary basins were filled by fluvio-deltaic sediments transported by rivers from several different catchment areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) These are sufficiently far apart to have experienced different types of climate, although all would have been subject to the same world-wide climate changes associated with the waxing and waning of the southern hemisphere ice sheets. All of the basins were obviously subject to identical glacio-eustatic sea level changes. Tectonic influences; source-area uplift and variable rates of subsidence complicate the climatic interpretation of the various successions.</p><p>The most important sediment source for the Pennine Basin was the northern Caledonian river system which crossed the North Sea before terminating in the Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref54">54</xref>]. An emerging consensus suggests a primary source in the Greenland Caledonides, with a possible secondary source in Scandinavia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref55">55</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref59">59</xref>]. The southern parts of the Pennine Basin also received sediments from the Anglo-Brabant Massif [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref63">63</xref>] , a large island within the equatorial belt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This was also the major sediment source for South Wales [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref64">64</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref65">65</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). From late Namurian times onwards a third “western” source became increasingly important in the Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref66">66</xref>]. The dominant source for the Ruhr Basin was the Variscan Mountains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref67">67</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref68">68</xref>] , but some sediment was probably also sourced from the Baltic Shield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref68">68</xref>]. By the Westphalian (Bolsovian) the Variscan source dominated almost the entire area, but this did not reach the Pennine Basin or UK North Sea in the period covered by this study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref53">53</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Upper Carboniferous Cyclothems and Deltaic Sequences</title><p>Large parts of the western European Namurian and early Westphalian successions can be divided into cyclothems dominated by fluvio-deltaic sediments. The cyclothems are bounded by flooding surfaces which in many areas are overlain by black mudstones commonly containing thick-shelled goniatites (known as marine bands) and in more marginal areas by shaleswithLingula, or shallow water limestones with marine fauna. The rapidly evolving nature of their goniatite fauna enables most cyclothems to be recognized across most of the west European sedimentary basins, and to a lesser extent into east Europe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref69">69</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref70">70</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref71">71</xref>]. In parts of basins which had not yet been filled with deltaic sediments, the cyclothems within basinal mudstones are typically only a meter or two thick, sometimes less [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref72">72</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref73">73</xref>]. Where deltaic sequences were deposited, the cyclothems are commonly tens of meters in thickness and locally over 100 m. In this paper each recognized cyclothem has been numbered; so the first cyclothem in the Pendleian is P1 and the second cyclothem in the Arnsbergian is AR2 etc. (Section 5).</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Caledonian River System, Northern England &amp; North Sea Basins</title><p>Amongst the various cyclothems supplied by the Caledonian River System in Northern England up to three distinctive fluvial and deltaic sequences have been recognized (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Each developed at a different time in the evolution of the cyclothem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]. This classification is slightly different from an earlier classification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref75">75</xref>] , which was based more on the depth of water into which the deltas prograded.</p><p>1) Type 1 delta sequences formed from lobate deltas developed during the earliest phases of delta progradation and are locally present in almost all of the observed cyclothems (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref76">76</xref>] (Pendleian) and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref77">77</xref>] (Westphalian B) for more detailed sedimentology descriptions). Other descriptions are given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref78">78</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref83">83</xref>]. Many of the delta sequences are dominated by mouth bar deposits and are predominantly composed of very fine to medium-grained sandstones. In the Pennine Basin their lithology is commonly referred to as ‘flagstones’ (or ‘flags’ as in Rough Rock Flags, Beacon Hill Flags, Scotland Flags, Elland Flags, etc.). There is a wide variety of morphological sub-types defined by variations in the mouth bar facies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, Types 1a-1e). Only a few mouth bar sequences are dominated by wavy, hummocky or wave ripple lamination (Type 1a) eg. Lower Middleton Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>]. Parts of the Beacon Hill Flags (Type 2b) (Cyclothem M8, R2b5) have wavy lamination towards the top with parallel and current current ripple lamination with rare small scale trough cross-beds lower down [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]. Many Type 1 sequences show coarsening upwards grain size profiles with current ripple lamination passing up to cross-bedding at the top (1c). Some form multiple stacked units (eg.) parts of the Wards Stone Sandstone, Cyclothem Ar6-E2a [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref84">84</xref>]. In others such as the Uldale Sill and stratigraphic equivalents (Cyclothem P5-E1b) the mouthbar facies sit almost directly on the underlying</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Main features of the three deltaic sequence types in the Northern England/North Sea Caledonian fluvial system</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Main Features</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type 3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sst. Grain Size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mainly fine-medium, occ. coarse (Channels) vf. to medium (Mouthbars)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fine to coarse, occ. very coarse, pebble lags</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mainly coarse to very coarse with common scattered pebbles</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-bedding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mainly trough (Channels)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mainly trough</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mainly planar tabular</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mouthbar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commonly well-developed, but occasionally limited</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent or very limited, except in deep water deltas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Usually absent, but seen in some deep water deltas</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Planform</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Narrow (c1km) channels, much wider mouthbars</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Channel belts 8 - 50 km</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Narrow (2 - 4 km) channels up to 70 km wide sheets</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lateral accretion surfaces (Meandering)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palaeocurrent range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Highly variable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Narrow in channel, highly variable in different belts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Narrow</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sometimes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very common</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Position in cylothem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Early to Middle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Late</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very late (after eustatic min.)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>cyclothem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref85">85</xref>]. In the Scar House Beds (Cyclothem Ar11-E2b3) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] and parts of the Huddersfield White Rock (Cyclothem M10) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref46">46</xref>] , the mouth bar is dominated by density current deposits. In rare cases (Type 2e) the mouth bar facies is poorly developed, and channel deposits predominate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref86">86</xref>]. Trace fossil variety and abundance varies greatly; some mouth bar sequences such as the Beacon Hill Flags showing a wide variety of marginal marine types [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] whereas others are dominated by Pelecypodichnus (a.k.a Lockeia), the resting and escape traces of non-marine bivalves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref87">87</xref>]. Distributary channels in Type 1 delta sequences typically form sandbodies at least 1km wide which may show highly divergent paleocurrent orientations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref76">76</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref88">88</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref89">89</xref>] , suggesting a radial distributary pattern.</p><p>The sedimentology of mouth bars is influenced by the interaction of fluvial, wave and tidal processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref90">90</xref>] as well as by sea-level and sediment supply variations. In the Pennine Basin tides were probably very weak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref91">91</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref92">92</xref>] , but mouth bar sequences described above have both wave-dominated and fluvial-dominated end members. The former may have been deposited during static or very slowly rising sea levels when delta advance was slowed down, giving more time for reworking to varying extent by waves. Delta sequences dominated by channel deposits, or where proximal mouth bar facies sit directly on the underlying cyclothem, suggest probable forcing during periods of more rapidly falling sea-level than when mouthbar dominated sequences were deposited.</p><p>2) Type 2 delta sequences consist of multi-lateral and commonly multi-storey, fluvial channel sandstone sheets, typically 10 km wide or more (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Their grain size ranges from fine to very coarse grained sandstone with quartzitic pebble lag deposits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Trough cross-bedding, with a narrow paleocurrent range, is commonly present. Lateral accretion surfaces are absent. They have very little interbedded mud and are regarded as sandy, braided channel deposits formed by laterally shifting and commonly avulsing river channels. They equate with some of the sheet-deltas previously recognized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref75">75</xref>]. Examples include the Guiseley Grit (Cycle M8-R2b5) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] and Brooksbottoms Sandstone (Cycle M11-R2c2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref46">46</xref>]. The Fletcher Bank, Pule Hill and Midgley Grits (Cycle M5-R2b3), large channel fills with larger cross-beds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref81">81</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref93">93</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref94">94</xref>] and Lower Rough Rock (Cycle Y4-G1b1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref95">95</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref96">96</xref>] , also belong to this category, although previous sedimentological interpretations differ from those adopted here. Mouth bar sediments formed during deposition of Type 2 deltas are usually thin or absent. Coarsening-upwards progradational sequences found below many Type 2 sequences are now mostly regarded as Type 1 mouth-bar dominated delta sequences deposited earlier in the same cycle, as seen in Cycle M8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]. In rare cases, Type 2 channel fluvial channels fed deltas which prograded into underfilled deeper water areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, Type 2b). The best documented example is in parts of the R2b5 cycle (M8) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref97">97</xref>]. Here a thick muddy delta-slope sequence is developed, locally dominated by current ripple-laminated sandstones with Pelecypodichnus (a.k.a. Lockeia) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref87">87</xref>]. The overlying fluvial channel fills are typically up to 1km wide, but amalgamate to form wider sheets.</p><p>3) Type 3 delta sequences are dominated by very coarse-grained and commonly pebbly fluvial channel sandstones (the classic “Millstone Grits” of the UK Pennines). These developed high in the cyclothems and incise into deltaic sediments of Types 1 and 2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] , or even into deposits of underlying cyclothems. The dominant sedimentary structures are cosets of planar-tabular cross-bedding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref98">98</xref>] with individual sets up to 3 m. Like the deltas forming the Type 2 sequences, they are interpreted as sandy braided river deposits. A variety of channel types is recognized (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), distinguished mainly by lateral extent and degree of incision.</p><p>Type 3a (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). In shallower parts of the basin, the delta sequences comprise variably incised channel belts, typically 8 to 30 km wide. The Chatsworth Grit (R2c2-M14) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref46">46</xref>] a wide channel belt of about 20 km, can be traced up-current for over 500 km across the North Sea through wells in Quadrants 47 and 48, to Block 43/24 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) where it is developed as the Lower Trent Sandstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref99">99</xref>]. The middle lobe of the Crawshaw Sandstone (Cycle L1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref100">100</xref>] and parts of the coeval Woodhead Hill Rock and Ousel Nest Grit form a narrower, but similar type of channel (Section 4.2.3). Many of the late Kinderscoutian (R1c) very coarse grained delta channels such as the Addingham Edge and Lower Brimham Grits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref89">89</xref>] also fall into this category.</p><p>Type 3b (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Some very coarse channel deposits such as the late Yeadonian Upper Rough Rock (see Section 4.2.2) form exceptionally wide sheet sand bodies with only limited incision.</p><p>Type 3c (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). These are narrow and deep (10 - 40 m) fluvial channel deposits, the channels being repeatedly cut and filled by erosion during annual flood events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]. In addition to planar-tabular cross-beds, identical to those found in Type 3a and 3b delta channels, the more deeply eroded parts are filled with very large scale (5 - 40 m) cross-beds together with massive or faintly laminated sandstones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref101">101</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref106">106</xref>]. They are restricted to only three stratigraphic intervals:</p><p>late Pendleian (E1c), late Kinderscoutian (R1c) and late Marsdenian (R2b5). These channels all developed near the progradational limits of deep-water deltas, marking the first appearance of deltas in previously under-filled deep-water parts of the basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref106">106</xref>].</p><p>Type 3d (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Much narrower (c2-4 km) channel fills of middle Pendleian to early Arnsbergian age occur mainly in the Northumberland Trough and adjacent Alston Block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Examples include the Grit Sills, Shaftoe Grit and Rothley Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref107">107</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref108">108</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref109">109</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref110">110</xref>]. These channel fills are also deeply incised but unlike Type 3c, they are not deep water delta deposits and where exposed are clearly some distance back from the original delta fronts.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Origin and Classification of Sedimentary Cyclothems</title><p>The sedimentary succession in northern England has been subdivided into 81 cyclothems (71 in the Namurian), mostly defined by marine bands. This is a slightly higher number than commonly seen in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref111">111</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref112">112</xref>] , because some of the additional cyclothems recognized in this study are not delineated by marine bands with goniatites. It is now widely accepted that these Northern Hemisphere cyclothems were principally caused by glacio-eustatic sea-level fluctuations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref96">96</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref111">111</xref>]. Average cyclothem duration in the interval from Top Serpukhovian (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) to Top Namurian (43 cyclothems), using the age dates from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) is 109 Ky. Comparison with the Pleistocene glacial cycles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) suggests a correlation with 4<sup>th</sup> order short-eccentricity orbital forcing. Average cyclothem duration for the older interval down to base Namurian again using dates from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>] (28 cyclothems) is 214 Ky. This does not equate to any known orbital forcing periods (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), but there may be missing cyclothems in the Pennine and other NW European successions in this interval. It has been suggested [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref19">19</xref>] that some of the cyclothems in the Serpukhovian are of 400 Ky duration (long-eccentricity). However, other basins with greater subsidence, such as parts of the Midland Valley in Scotland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref113">113</xref>] and the West Silesian Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref114">114</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref115">115</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>] have additional cyclothems in</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Recent most likely age estimates for early Upper Carboniferous stratigraphic boundaries (Ma)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Peterson (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref117">117</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pointon et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref118">118</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Davydov et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Jir&#225;sek et al. (2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cohen et al. (2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref119">119</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Menning (2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref120">120</xref>]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Top Namurian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >318.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Top Serp./Miss.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >324.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >320</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Base Namurian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >329.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Base Serpukhovian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >331.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >326.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>this interval,with radiometric dates in the latter indicating an average duration of 92.5 Ky; also consistent with short eccentricity cyclothem lengths.</p><p>The relationship between 4<sup>th</sup> order glacio-eustacy and cyclothem development is complicated by several factors. Preservation of cyclothems is greatest in basins with higher rates of subsidence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref121">121</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref122">122</xref>]. Additional cyclothems may result from shorter period 5<sup>th</sup> order glacio-eustacy (precession and obliquity, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), as well as from autocyclic processes (delta-switching), although the latter tend to be thin and more locally developed. It has been argued that tectonic events may also lead to cyclothems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref123">123</xref>] , although the author thinks this is uncommon in the Upper Carboniferous.</p><p>In the Pennine and adjacent North Sea Basins (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), where sedimentation is dominated by the Caledonian fluvial system, there are two main types of sedimentary cyclothem, simple and complex. All of the cyclothems contain Type 1 deltaic sequences; whilst a third of the cyclothems are complex containing two or three types of sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The stratigraphic distribution of the simple and complex cyclothems for the entire Namurian and early Langsettian is discussed in detail later in Section 5. Three of the best exposed and best documented complex cyclothems which contain all three delta sequence types are described below.</p><p>1) R2b5 Cyclothem (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). The sedimentology of various parts of this cyclothem with later revisions discussing evidence for glacio-eustatic sea-level changes has been described by Jones and Chisholm (1997) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref11">11</xref>] Jones (2014) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] and Jones and McCabe (1980) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref104">104</xref>]. The early Type 1 delta sequence (Beacon Hill Flags) was abandoned (sea-level rise?) and succeeded by a Type 2 delta sequence</p><p>(Guiseley Grit). This was interpreted as a forced regression with channels pulled out into the basin during falling sea-level. The sea-level fall led to ganister formation on the previously abandoned Beacon Hill Flags. The overlying Lower Meltham Coal then formed above both the ganister and the Guiseley Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref124">124</xref>] , suggesting another brief sea-level rise. A major avulsion then diverted the delta into the southern Pennine Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) to form a Type 2b, deep water forced-regression delta filling in the remaining basinal areas in Derbyshire (Widmerpool Gulf) and north Staffordshire. A second sea-level fall is inferred and further north a second ganister formed above the Lower Meltham Coal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref124">124</xref>]. The coarse and pebbly Upper Roaches and Ashover Grits form Type 3a and 3c channel-dominated delta sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The thickest parts of this sandbody, preserved near the southern limits of the Roaches and Ashover Grit outcrops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) were interpreted to be part of an 80 m thick incised valley fill eroded during the lowstand (glacial maximum) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref11">11</xref>]. The current view is that the main phase of incision occurred a little later during the ensuing post-glacial sea-level rise, as a result of increased rainfall in the catchment area (see Section 6.2 and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]). A thick sequence of very coarse sediments was then deposited as a result of accommodation space produced by a combination of fluvial incision, eustatic sea level rise and localized high rates of subsidence caused by sediment loading and compaction of the thick sediment pile at the delta front.</p><p>2) G1b Cyclothem (Y4) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0) is extensively exposed across the Central Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref66">66</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref79">79</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref95">95</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref125">125</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref126">126</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref127">127</xref>]. Previous interpretations of this cyclothem are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>. In spite of its complex nature, the same types of deltaic sequences as seen in the older R2b5 cyclothem can be recognised. The Rough Rock Flags (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(A), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0) represent the earliest phase of progradation into the Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref79">79</xref>]. This is interpreted as a Type 1 delta sequence, similar to the Beacon Hill Flags described above. Earlier phases in this sequence have been cored in the North Sea in the Trent Field (Quad 43) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref128">128</xref>] and other released well data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The delta was then abandoned and the overlying flooding surface onshore is overlain (where preserved) by mudstones known locally as the Rough Rock Shale.</p><p>The next component of the cyclothem is the Lower Rough Rock, which normally overlies the Rough Rock Flags or Shale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref66">66</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref129">129</xref>] , but rests unconformably on the Upper Haslingden Flags of the underlying cyclothem in parts of Lancashire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref66">66</xref>]. An unconformity is also seen locally in Yorkshire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref130">130</xref>] and below the Aqueduct Grit in North Wales [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref127">127</xref>] This was widespread in NW Europe, being also seen in South Wales [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref65">65</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref131">131</xref>] and offshore boreholes west of Ireland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref132">132</xref>] and unpublished well data. The Lower Rough Rock shows a complex palaeocurrent pattern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref79">79</xref>] suggesting a number of mutually eroding channel bodies, their precise order of deposition being uncertain. The channels forming the Lower Rough Rock are interpreted here as a Type 2a (forced regression) delta complex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(B)). The multi-story nature of the delta channels seen in the Elland Road Cutting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(B), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(D); <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0) and locally in Lancashire requires either a later sea-level rise or increased subsidence. The culmination of this led to the deposition of the Sand Rock Mine Coal which extensively overlies the Lower Rough Rock in Lancashire. Further east this coal is largely eroded by</p><p>later channels except at Harden Clough in Yorkshire (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(D)). The Lower Rough Rock is commonly exceptionally coarse-grained and pebbly for a Type 2 delta and this could result from the tectonic event seen in the basin also being responsible for uplift in the source area, although climatic effects cannot be excluded.</p><p>A mature seat-earth is locally developed above the abandoned delta lobe of the Rough Rock Flags near Sheffield (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(D)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref125">125</xref>]. This is correlated with the eustatic minimum. The Upper Rough Rock, commonly seen to overlie the Sand Rock Mine Coal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(D), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0) is the coarsest of all the channel systems. This is a sheet-sand 70 km wide and dies out to the south without any significant associated mouth bar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(C), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(D)). It is the youngest of the fluvial channel deposits and is interpreted here as a Type 3 delta deposited late in the cyclothem. Following abandonment of this channel the Six Inch Mine coal and its characteristic overlying non-marine bivalve band (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(D)) was deposited during the final stage of the sea level rise.</p><p>3) Early Langsettian Cyclothem (L1). The sedimentology of part of this cyclothem in the eastern outcrop area (Crawshaw Sandstone) was first described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref100">100</xref>] which recognized three separate delta lobes. Applying the model discussed earlier suggests a different order of deposition from previously proposed. The northern lobe (Soft Bed Flags) is interpreted here as a Type 1 delta sequence forming the first phase of progradation into the Pennine Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). In Lancashire the mouth-bar dominated Margery Flags which may be of western</p><p>provenance (J. I. Chisholm, pers. com.) are probably contemporary. These deltas were abandoned, followed by the deposition of the Margery Coal in Lancashire and possibly the Soft Bed Coal in Yorkshire, although this could, in places be later.</p><p>This was followed by the southernmost of the three lobes in the Crawshaw Sandstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref100">100</xref>] , medium to coarse grained fluvial channel sandstones, lacking any underlying mouth bar deposits. They are interpreted here as a Type 2a delta sequence. Similar fluvial channel deposits are extensively developed as the Woodhead Hill Rock around the Cheadle Coalfield in Staffordshire and probably in Lancashire (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). The same channel system is probably also seen in the North Sea where an extensive medium grained fluvial sheet-sand forms the main reservoir of the Cavendish gas field (43/19) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref134">134</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref135">135</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). A later fluvial channel is represented by the very coarse and pebbly middle lobe of the Crawshaw Sandstone, well exposed at Birchen Edge (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref100">100</xref>] (their <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). This is correlated with similar coarse-grained channel sandstones in Lancashire (Ousel Nest Grit), which overlies the Marjery Flags (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1).</p><p>This fluvial channel fill appears to be deeply incised over the East Midlands Shelf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref133">133</xref>] but less so in the basin. It is interpreted as a Type 3a delta sequence.</p><p>Complex cyclothems in the earlier Namurian (pre-Kinderscoutian) have been less studied and the main published accounts of their sedimentology are given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref45">45</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref84">84</xref>]. Further discussion is given in Section 5.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Ruhr Basin Cyclothems and Deltaic Sequences</title><p>The fluvio-deltaic sequence in this basin is Marsdenian and younger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref29">29</xref>]. Few palaeocurrent data are available, but the sandbody distribution and pebble types suggest there were probably two sediment sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref68">68</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The dominant source was the evolving Variscan Mountains to the south [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>]. These lay in a young fold belt which underwent major late Visean tectonism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref67">67</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref136">136</xref>].</p><p>Two types of delta sequence are recognized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>]. Mouth-bar dominated delta sequences, not dissimilar to the Type 1 delta sequences in the Caledonian fluvial system, are the primary progradational features (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(C)). These form coarsening-upwards sequences with either proximal mouth-bar or distributary channel fills towards the top. Most are capped by root beds and coals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>]. In addition, many cyclothems contain more extensive coarse-grained and often pebbly multi-story fluvial channel sheet-sands, some of which show significant incision. There have been two theories for the origin of these: 1) Accelerating sea-level fall prior to the low-stand caused the fluvial distributary channels to incise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref14">14</xref>]. The channels were then filled during the lowstand; as sea levels stabilised. 2) The channels were both cut and filled during the lowstand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>]. This would allow a possible break between the mouth-bar dominated deltas and later incised channel fills (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(C)). Further discussion is given in Section 6.2.</p><p>There are two types of cyclothem; the first containing only mouth bar dominated delta sequences, whilst the second type also contains extensive coarse-grained, multi-story channel deposits as discussed earlier (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(C)). Prograding mouth bar dominated deltas were active earlier within the longer (4<sup>th</sup> order) cyclothems, the coarser channel fills, seen in some cyclothems, being deposited later. In the Ruhr Basin, where subsidence rates were generally higher than in the Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref121">121</xref>] , there is commonly a well-developed transgressive sequence deposited in the later part of the cyclothem. These contain thin deltaic sequences capped by coals.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Marine Bands in NW Europe</title><p>Marine bands are commonly highly condensed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref137">137</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref138">138</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref139">139</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref140">140</xref>] , but internally complex, and are named after the dominant thick-shelled goniatite fauna. Although a majority contain only one thick-shelled goniatite interval, others can have two, eg G. subcrenatum, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref140">140</xref>]; three, eg Ca. cancellatum, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref141">141</xref>] and locally up to four intervals with goniatites, eg B. gracilis, R2a1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref142">142</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref143">143</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref144">144</xref>]. These are interbedded with horizons which are either unfossiliferous, or contain inferred lower salinity faunas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref144">144</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref145">145</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref146">146</xref>].</p><p>The marine bands formed after the sea level rises caused by end-glacial ice melting flooded the deltas which then retreated back to the basin margins. Thick-shelled goniatites then occupied deeper water areas which developed over regions of greater subsidence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The internal faunal complexity of many marine bands is probably related to intra-cycle (5<sup>th</sup> order?) sea-level fluctuations. The distribution of the four intervals with goniatites within the complex B. gracilis band (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2) suggests precession (c20Ky in the Carboniferous), or obliquity (35 Ky in the Carboniferous) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref147">147</xref>] as possible causes for these sea-level fluctuations, assuming the whole cycle (R2a1) took approximately 100 Ky to deposit (as discussed in Section 4.2). Comparisons with the Pleistocene (Section 2, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) show a much closer correlation between sea-level changes and precession. The marine bands and limestones largely lacking goniatites formed in more slowly subsiding areas with shallower water (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The cyclothems in the Ruhr Basin (Section 4.3) contain marine bands with thick-shelled goniatites each of which normally has the same number of thick-shelled goniatite horizons with similar fauna as their counterparts in the UK basins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref148">148</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref149">149</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Namurian to Early Langsettian Sedimentary Succession in Northern England and Adjacent Areas of NW Europe</title><p>The stratigraphic distribution of cyclothem types is not random and allows the succession to be divided into eight longer period intervals each dominated by either simple or complex cyclothems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3). These intervals are not the same as the mesothems previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref145">145</xref>] , but do have some common boundaries. Additional useful data come from the stratigraphic distribution of goniatite faunas in the condensed pro-delta offshore sequence on the Ashover Shelf in Derbyshire (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). This was described in great detail in three continuously cored boreholes which penetrated most of the Namurian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref72">72</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref111">111</xref>]. Later in Section 6.2 it is argued that the eight longer period intervals relate to</p><p>climatic variations and sea-level fluctuations over longer time periods than those associated with individual glacial cyclothems.</p><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Pendleian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4; Cyclothems P1-9)</title><p>The base of the Pendleian is here taken at the base of the Cravenoceras leion MB in basinal areas and at the base of the Great Limestone north of the Craven Fault (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref150">150</xref>]. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref151">151</xref>] the base of the Serpukhovian is placed a little lower at the base of the underlying Four Fathom Limestone on the basis of the foraminiferal data in the Seal Sands well in the Stainmore Trough (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>In the early Pendleian only one cyclothem is traditionally recognized between the C. leion and the overlying C. brandoni marine bands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref152">152</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref153">153</xref>]. However, radiometric dates from the East Silesian and Donetsk Basins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>] suggest a probable time span of c1-2 My for the Lower Pendleian. Therefore, the C. leion MB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) and equivalent Great Limestone further north is likely to be a condensed sequence deposited over a considerable time period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref154">154</xref>]. Above the Great Limestone, two prominent early cyclothems are represented by the Lower and Upper Coal Sills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref155">155</xref>]. These are interpreted as Type 1 delta sequences.</p><p>The most completely exposed section in this interval is seen on the Northumberland coast near Alnwick (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref156">156</xref>]. Additional cyclothems are seen here, but their status remains uncertain. The overlying cyclothems (P3-4) are possibly partly represented in basinal areas by the complex T. pseudobilinguis MB. The basinal marine bands rarely contain any interbedded coarser clastics, although in the Duffield borehole (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) turbidites derived from the Anglo-Brabant Massif occur between two of the T. pseudobilinguis leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref157">157</xref>].</p><p>Cyclothem P5 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) begins with the Uldale Sill and Jackdaw Crags, its stratigraphic equivalent in the Northumberland Trough [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref85">85</xref>]. On the Askrigg Block the Uldale Sill sits almost on top of the underlying Faraday House Sill, the two sandstones collectively known as the Ten Fathom Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref158">158</xref>]. A similar situation is seen in the Haltwhistle Burn section in the Northumberland Trough [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref85">85</xref>] where proximal mouth-bar facies of the Jackdaw Crags sit directly on the Leeshall Quarry Coal from the underlying P4 cyclothem. Cyclothem P5 is the first complex cyclothem seen in the Namurian and the narrow Type 3 delta channel at the top of the cyclothem, the Rothley Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref108">108</xref>] incises down into a number of older cyclothems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref109">109</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref110">110</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref159">159</xref>].</p><p>The remaining cyclothems in the Pendleian (P6-12) are also mainly complex. On the Alston Block and Stainmore Trough (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), Type 3 delta sequences are represented by the various Grit Sills (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4), which form narrow deeply incised channels cut into earlier Type 1 delta sequences represented by the Slate Sills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref107">107</xref>]. Further north in Northumberland; the Shaftoe Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref108">108</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref109">109</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref110">110</xref>] is composed of at least two narrow incised channels, also interpreted as Type 3 delta sequences. The precise stratigraphic range of this multi-cyclic channel complex is unclear. During this time, thick turbidite sands (Pendle Grit, P6-7) started to fill the deep-water Bowland and Craven Basins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref101">101</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref102">102</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref160">160</xref>].</p><p>Abbreviations used: in Figures 14-20.</p><p>AEG Addingham Edge Grit, AQ Aqueduct Grit, BBG Brocka Bank Grit, BBM Barncroft Bank Member, BBS Brooksbottoms Sst., BES Brown Edge Sst., BHF Beacon Hill Flags, BG Brimham Grit, BHG Botton Head Grit, BLES Blackstone Edge Sst., BS Brockholes Sst., CCG Caley Crags Grit, CG Chatsworth Grit, CL Crag Lst., CMS Cloughton Moor Siltstones, CoG Corbar Grit, CQ Cumbriense Quartzite, CrS Crawshaw Sst., CS Cheddleton Sst., DCS Dure Clough Silstones, DFS Dun Fell Sst., DWG Devils Water Grit, ECG East Carlton Grit, FBG Fletcher Bank Grit, FC Finefrau Conglomerate, FCS Five Clouds Sst., GIF Gull Island Fm., GG Guiseley Grit, GR Ganister Rock, GrG Grassington Grit, GS Grit Sill, GSh Grindslow Shales, HBG Holcombe Brook Grit. HER Helpet Edge Rock, HFS Hack Falls Sst., HHF Howells Head Flags, HHG Harrock Hill Grit, HR Heydon Rock, HWR Huddersfield White Rock, IR Inch Rock, KG Kinderscout Grit, KS Kniveden Sst. LAG Lower Ashover Grit, LCS Lower Coal Sill, LER Loxley Edge Rock, LES Lum Edge Ssts., LHEG Lower Howgate Edge Grit, LHF Lower Haslingden Flags, LFG Lower Follifoot Grit, LFW Lower Farewell Rock, LHEG Lower Howgate Edge Grit, LLQ Lower Leasehall Quartzite, LMC Lower Meltham Coal, LPG Lower Plompton Grit, LRR Lower Rough Rock, LRSG Lower Red Scar Grit, LS Ladgill Sill, LSG Lower Shaftoe Grit, Ment. Mentor, MG Midgley Grit, MiG Middleton Grit, MrG Marchup Grit, MTB MamTor Beds, ONG Ousel Nest Grit, PEG Pickersett Edge Grit, PHG Pule Hill Grit, PS Pendle Shales, RDF Readycon Dean Flags, ReG Revidge Grit, RRF Rough Rock Flags, RR Rough Rock, RSG Red Scar Grit, RG/AG Roaches/Ashover Grit, RoG Rothley Grit, RS Ross Sst., Sarnsb. Sarnsbank, SC Sharpcliffe Conglomerate, Sch. Schieferbank, Schg Schieferbanksgen Sst., Schs Schmiedestrasse Sst., SellS Sellenberg Sst., SG Shaftoe Grit, SHG Shale Grit, SS Sheen Sst., TG Todmorden Grit, THG Tanhill Grit, UBG Upper Brimham Grit, UCS Upper Coal Sill, UGSh Upper Grindslow Shale, UHF Upper Haslingden Flags, UHEG Upper Howgate Edge Grit, UKG Upper Kinderscout Grit, UPG Upper Plompton Grit, URR Upper Rough Rock, URSG Upper Red Scar Grit, WBG Walker Barn Grit, WFG Waddington Fells Grit,, WH White Hazle, WHR Woodhead Hill Rock, SF Scotland Flags, WSS Ward’s Stone Sst., WWG Warley Wise Grit.</p><p>The latest Pendleian (P9-P11, late E1c) contains a series of very coarse-grained and pebbly Type 3 delta channels, the Warley Wise and Grassington Grits plus local stratigraphic equivalents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref101">101</xref>]. Both [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref102">102</xref>] interpreted this sequence as a major incised valley complex. However, the present author follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref150">150</xref>] and many earlier publications which showed that there is a major tectonic unconformity caused by uplift between cycles P8 and P9 on the Askrigg Block and probably also in the Bowland Basin to the south (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref161">161</xref>]. The sequence contains up to three sedimentary cyclothems (P9-11) developed over the southern part of the Askrigg Block [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref150">150</xref>] and the Craven Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref101">101</xref>] , all</p><disp-formula id="scirp.119587-formula8"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/7-2802223x16.png?20220830165306997"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Key to Figures 14-17 &amp; 19-20.</p><p>containing very coarse-grained pebbly sandstones interpreted as Type 3 delta channel complexes.. On the northern part of the Askrigg Block only the uppermost of these channels persists, the 15 km wide, Lower Howgate Edge Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref150">150</xref>] , which can be traced northwards into the Stainmore Trough [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref162">162</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4). Further south, in deeper water areas, this interval is probably stratigraphically equivalent to the very coarse and highly channelised turbidites of the Pendle Grit in the Waddington Fell outlier in the Bowland Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref163">163</xref>]. The turbidite Minn Sandstones in the Staffordshire Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref164">164</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref165">165</xref>] were also deposited in part during this period. In the final cyclothem, P12 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) the Bradley Flags a mouthbar dominated (Type 1) delta sequence is developed in the Harrogate Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>This interpretation suggests the Pendleian contains more cyclothems than traditionally recognized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref111">111</xref>]. Other early Namurian basins with higher subsidence rates such as the Kincardine Basin in the Midland Valley Scotland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref113">113</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and the West Silesian Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) contain even more cyclothems.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Arnsbergian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5; AR1-15)</title><p>The first cyclothem (AR1) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) includes the Upper Howgate Edge Grit, interpreted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] as an incised channel complex. Isopachs of this interval [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref86">86</xref>] suggest a series of separate channels with variable orientations. These cut into an attenuated mouth-bar sequence and the grit overall is interpreted as a Type 1</p><p>delta sequence. On the Alston Block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), another very coarse channel in the same cyclothem (Upper Grit Sill) incises through the Lower Felltop Limestone, the basal Arnsbergian flooding surface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref107">107</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref166">166</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref167">167</xref>]. These last two channels are also interpreted as probable Type 3 sequences. In the overlying cyclothem (AR2) the Tan Hill Grit on the Askrigg Block is a fluvial channel sheet-sand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>]. This is another forced regressive deltaic sequence (Type 1d or 2a).</p><p>The rest of the Arnsbergian succession in northern England contains predominantly simple cyclothems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5, AR3-5, 7-10, 13-15). There are only three complex cyclothems in this interval, the Lower Red Scar Grit and lateral equivalents; the Pickersett Edge Grit, and part of the Ward’s Stone Sandstone in the Bowland Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref84">84</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref153">153</xref>]. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] this was interpreted these as an incised valley-fill complex, but there is now thought to be a tectonic unconformity below these sandstones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref84">84</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref153">153</xref>]. They are coarse, locally very coarse and pebbly, and are interpreted as a probable Type 3 delta sequence.</p><p>The succeeding interval (Caton Shales) contains at least four cyclothems, (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5, AR7-10) in which deltaic sediments are largely absent from the Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref84">84</xref>]. Radiometric dates from the Pennines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref118">118</xref>] and stratigraphic equivalent section in the West Silesian Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>] suggest a significant time span for this interval (Section 4.2). Compared to the more rapidly subsiding West Silesian Basin, it appears to be condensed in the UK Pennines, with many missing cyclothems. Following on from this episode, in Cyclothem AR11 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5), the Devils Water river section in Northumberland contains a very coarse pebbly sandstone channel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref45">45</xref>] , interpreted here as another Type 3 delta sequence.</p><p>A third complex cyclothem (AR12) contains the Lower Follifoot Grit. This is a coarse-grained fluvial channel sheet-sand that occupies a wide area across the Askrigg Block and Harrogate Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Further south, the Nesfield Sandstone, a wave-dominated mouth bar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] is probably in this cycle, forming part of the early Type 1 sequence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5). The rest of the Arnsbergian sequence contains three simple cyclothems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5, Cyclothems AR13-15), including the locally wave-modified mouth bar of the Middleton Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] and the Silverhills Sandstone in Lancashire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref84">84</xref>]. The youngest three Arnsbergian marine bands all have N. nuculum. North of the Craven Fault this interval is extremely thin or absent due to condensation, believed to have been caused by low rates of subsidence.</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Chokierian to Mid Kinderscoutian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7; Cyclothems CH1-6, AL1-6, KI-10)</title><p>North of the Craven Fault much of the interval is missing or very highly condensed. Not all of the flooding intervals which overlie the deltaic sequences in this area contain thick-shelled goniatites. As a result, correlation across the region is still uncertain and the precise stratigraphic horizon of several of the named deltaic sequences remains unclear. In the offshore North Sea Basin</p><p>(<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8), most cyclothems cannot be dated precisely because of the scarcity of goniatite information. However, the limited well log and core data suggest that the cyclothems are not significantly different; in particular, as in the onshore succession there is a shortage of thick channel sandstones that are characteristic of Type 2 and Type 3 delta sequences.</p><p>All but one of the twenty two cyclothems in this interval in the Pennine Basin contain only Type 1 sequences. However, the last cycle in the Chokierian (CH6) is unusual, with widespread evidence for a significant sea-level drop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref111">111</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6) in the Staffordshire Basin, where a deltaic sequence, the Sharpcliffe Conglomerate is present [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref168">168</xref>]. This is one of the most extensive of all the Namurian deltas derived from the Anglo-Brabant Massif. In the Ashover boreholes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) succession, the cyclothem contains a lithologically unusual sequence of siltstones, 5 - 7 m thick, containing several horizons with Posidonia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref72">72</xref>]. These are regarded as a shallower water interval than most of the Ashover succession. No Type 3 delta sequence is seen, but well developed soil horizons, the “ganister beds” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref169">169</xref>] occur on the Askrigg Block, suggesting a period of incision somewhere in the basin.</p><p>A major regressive sequence is also seen in this cycle in northern France, represented by the Gr&#233;s de Suchmont and Zone des Murs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref170">170</xref>]. In the Aachen Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) this regressive interval is represented by the Burgholzer Conglomerate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref171">171</xref>]. In the Donetsk Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) an extensive erosive fluvial channel sandstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref20">20</xref>] may be of the same age. In the Pennine Basin, the overlying cyclothems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7; AL1-6, K1-10) up to the Late Kinderscoutian are all simple.</p></sec><sec id="s5_4"><title>5.4. Late Kinderscoutian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7; Cyclothems K11-15)</title><p>This interval contains at least five complex cyclothems, which in the Pennine Basin are dominated by laterally extensive and commonly deeply incised Type 3 delta channels known as the Kinderscout Grit and local stratigraphic names (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7). In the Irish Clare Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7) the first incised channel-fill (Tullig Sst.) appears in Cyclothem K9 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref172">172</xref>]. Therefore, the major sedimentological change associated with the appearance of these major incised channels and associated turbidites probably took place in late R1b, but incised channel fills did not appear in the Pennine Basin until two to three cycles later. In the North Sea (Quads 43 &amp; 44) the incoming of these thick and coarse channel sands is very obvious in gamma ray logs from wells such as 43/21-2, 43/24-1 and 43/25-1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8). However, because of the absence of goniatite data the precise cyclothem in which these are first seen cannot be determined.</p><p>After late Kinderscoutian Cyclothem K12 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7) the delta then migrated southwards from Yorkshire into Derbyshire (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) as the deep Central Pennine Basin was filled by thick deltaic slope sequences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref80">80</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref173">173</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref174">174</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref175">175</xref>]. Many of the Type 3 delta channels in this progradational phase contain very</p><p>large cross-beds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref103">103</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref104">104</xref>]. Type 1 delta sequences, developed in the earlier parts of the cyclothems are seen in the Grindslow Shales in Derbyshire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref80">80</xref>] , plus references cited above; and in the Bowland Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref84">84</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref142">142</xref>]. Similar sequence types are also seen offshore in wells marginal to the main channel belt such as 44/16-1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8). No Type 2 delta sequences have yet been recognized, their preservation potential being low due to the extensive Type 3 delta channels developed towards the ends of the five late Kinderscoutian cycles.</p><p>In Belgium this regressive interval is represented by thick fluvial conglomeratic sandstones of the Gr&#232;s d’Andenne [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref176">176</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref177">177</xref>]. In the Aachen Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), the Gedauer Conglomerate, which contains very large reworked chert boulders, is also within R1c [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref171">171</xref>]. At Ashover (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref72">72</xref>] goniatites are lacking in the R1c2, 3 and 4 marine bands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3). The final cyclothem above the Butterly MB (K15-R1c5) contains a Type 1 delta sequence with Olivellites (a.k.a. Psammichnites)in the mouth-bar facies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref178">178</xref>] and a later Type 3 delta sequence of the Upper Kinderscout Grit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref9">9</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5_5"><title>5.5. Marsdenian and Yeadonian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0; Cyclothems M1-13, Y1-4)</title><p>The major late Kinderscoutian coarse grained interval (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8) ends with the complex B. gracilis MB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref143">143</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref144">144</xref>] (Section 4.4; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2) at the base of the Marsdenian. The four succeeding cyclothems (M1 to M4) in the early Marsdenian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9) are all simple. A similar transition is very obvious from gamma ray logs through Quad 43 and 44 wells in the North Sea (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8). Cyclothem M5 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9) is dominated by an extensive series of thick sheet channel-sands represented by the Fletcher Bank Grit in Lancashire and the Midgley and Pule Hill Grits in Yorkshire, plus local stratigraphic names [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref82">82</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref93">93</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref94">94</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref179">179</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref180">180</xref>]. This cyclothem (M5) also sees significant progradation further west into the previously under-filled basin in central Lancashire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref179">179</xref>]. Cyclothem M6 is a simple cycle of uncertain status.</p><p>The last two complex cyclothems, M7 and M8 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9) include the very coarse grained Type 3 deltas forming parts of the Ashover and Roaches Grits, (see Section 4.2). In M8 (R2b5) there was major progradation into the Staffordshire Basin towards the end of the deposition of this cyclothem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]. In the Ruhr Basin there are two coarse-grained channel sands, the Kaisberg Conglomerate in M7 and Sengsb&#228;nksgen Conglomerate in M8, the latter interpreted as an incised valley fill [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>A major flooding surface, the B. superbilinguis MB marks the end of this coarse grained interval (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9). The succeeding interval consists of nine cyclothems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0; M9-13, Y1-4). The oldest, cyclothem M9 contains five locally developed simple cyclothems in high subsidence parts of the Ruhr Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>]. Each contains coarsening upwards delta mouth-bar sequences and a sedimentology log through the youngest, where it is 28m thick, is given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref181">181</xref>]. The cyclothems are not seen elsewhere, the equivalent interval (M9) in Quad 43, (43/19a-4z) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) being only one centimeter thick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref182">182</xref>] and in the Central Pennine Basin the interval consists of a mainly mudstone sequence only a few metres thick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref73">73</xref>]. In South Wales only a single cyclothem is present [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref130">130</xref>].</p><p>The remaining Namurian interval (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0; M10-13, Y1-4) contains both simple and complex cyclothems. Two of the latter are M11 which contains the Chatsworth Grit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9) and Y4 which contains the Rough Rock (see Section 4.2, Figs. 9, 10). In cycle Y4, incised channels from two separate sediment sources also occur in South Wales (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref65">65</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref130">130</xref>]. A third major regressive channel sand, the Raleigh Sandstone from a probable Variscan source, occurs in the Culm Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref130">130</xref>]. In cyclothem M11 the in cised Lower Trent Sst. occurs in the North Sea (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8) (well 43/24-1, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref99">99</xref>] , plus unpublished well data which includes the cored Ca. cancellatum MB in the</p><p>Trent Field) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8); suggesting this is the up-current equivalent of the Chatsworth Grit. In the Ruhr Basin, both cyclothems are also complex, M11 containing the Wasserbank Sst. interpreted as an incised valley fill [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] and Y4 the coarse-grained Sarnsb&#228;nksgen Sst which locally erodes through the underlying marine band [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref183">183</xref>]. Cyclothem M10 (Neufl&#246;z Sst.) contains a thick multi-story channel sandstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5_6"><title>5.6. Early Langsettian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0; Cyclothems L1-9)</title><p>This interval is similar to the late Namurian and contains both simple and complex cyclothems. Altogether, four complex cyclothems have been recognized. The first of these in the Pennine Basin (L1) contains the Crawshaw Sst., (Section 4.2; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). The Woodview Sst. in the same cyclothem in the Leinster Coalfield incises through the G. subcrenatum MB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref184">184</xref>]. The second complex cyclothem (L5) contains coarse-grained, commonly incised channels in four separate fluvial systems; the very coarse Harrock Hill Grit in the Pennine Caledonian system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref185">185</xref>]; the upper Farewell Rock in South Wales [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref186">186</xref>] , derived from the Anglo Brabant Massif; the Variscan sourced Finefrau Conglomerate in the Ruhr Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>] and the Late Ransart Member in the Campine Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), sourced from the Anglo-Brabant Massif [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref187">187</xref>]. The third complex cyclothem (L7) also contains incised channel fills in four separate systems. In the Pennine Basin there is the Caledonian sourced Type 3 delta channel in parts of the Helpet Edge Rock [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref185">185</xref>]. In South Wales the Cefn Cribbwr Rock incises through two older cyclothems into the Listeri MB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref188">188</xref>]. In southern Ireland the Variscan sourced Clay Gall Sandstone is widely developed in three of the small coal basins and also locally incises through the Listeri MB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref184">184</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref189">189</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref190">190</xref>]. In the Ruhr Basin the multi-storey, coarse-grained Girondell Sandstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref15">15</xref>] is from a separate Variscan source. The fourth complex cyclothem (L9) in the Pennine Basin in Lancashire contains a narrow coarse-grained Type 3 channel from the Caledonian river system which incises into a thick mouth bar sequence, which together form the Milnrow/Crutchman Sst. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref185">185</xref>] and in the Ruhr the coarse, pebbly Variscan sourced Sch&#246;ttelchen Sst. is probably in the same cyclothem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref121">121</xref>].</p><p>In the Pennine Basin all of these coarse-grained channel fills incise into finer grained sandstones mainly representing earlier Type 1 delta sequences. Type 2 delta sequences are represented by parts of the Crawshaw Sandstone in L1 (described in Section 4) and probably the Loxley Edge Rock in cycle L7.</p><p>In the Ruhr Basin, between the G. subcrenatum MB and the Schottelchen Coal (Langley Coal in the Pennines) fourteen cyclothems have been recognised [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref14">14</xref>] compared to only ten in the Pennine Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref185">185</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0). Many of the Ruhr Basin cyclothems are defined by coal seams. The widespread development of these additional cyclothems suggests they do not result from delta-switching, but are either 5<sup>th</sup> order events, or possibly 4<sup>th</sup> order cyclothems which are not developed in the more slowly subsiding Pennine Basin.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Climate Change Indicators during the Namurian-Early Langsettian</title><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. Northern England</title><p>This area contains the most complete succession through the Namurian and early Langsettian. Sediment input was dominated by the Caledonian system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It responded to changes in subsidence, catchment area elevation, sediment supply and glacio-eustatic sea-level fluctuations. Climatic change was affecting the latter two of these, but unraveling all the variable contributions is difficult. Modeling studies have shown that the same outcome can be achieved by variable inputs from each of the above four [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref191">191</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref192">192</xref>]. In flume experiments variations in fluvial discharge (sediment yield) produced facies patterns that resembled those attributed to sea-level changes in conventional sequence-stratigraphic models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref193">193</xref>]. Possible controls on the initiation and abandonment, plus varying sedimentary facies of the three delta types have been briefly discussed in Section 4 and are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Possible controls on initiation, abandonment and facies variation in various delta sequences of the Caledonian fluvial system</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Delta Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Autocyclicity</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Tectonism</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Climate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source Area Uplift (Sed. Supply)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basin Subsidence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fluvial Discharge (Sed. Supply)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sea-level Rise/Fall</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Type 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abandonment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grain Size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Superimposed Bedforms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stacked Channels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initiation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Type 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abandonment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Mouth Bar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stacked Channels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initiation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Type 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abandonment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wave Reworking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limited Mouth Bar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parasequencies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initiation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A key component of the complex cyclothems is the intra-cycle abandonment of the Type 1 deltas. There are two possible explanations for this.</p><p>1) Delta switching. Type 1 deltas in the Pennine Basin represent a late stage of delta progradation out of the North Sea basinal area. In rare cases where there is adequate stratigraphic control (eg Cylothem Y4, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0) separate delta lobes can be recognized in offshore well data. This shows that delta switching was occurring.</p><p>2) Intra-cyclothem sea-level rises. The late Pleistocene geologic record shows that in most glacial cycles, intra-cycle sea-level variability was related to ice volume fluctuations caused by short period, precession and obliquity orbital forcing events (Section 2; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). If the Carboniferous glacial cycles had the same types of climate variations, then similar sea-level fluctuations are a likely cause of delta abandonment. The marine bands with multiple thick-shelled goniatite horizons (Section 4.4) provide additional evidence of intra-cyclothem (5<sup>th</sup> order) sea-level fluctuations.</p><p>Complex cyclothems also contain Type 2 and 3 delta sequences (Section 4). The Type 2 sequences are characterised by the sheet geometry of the fluvial channel fills and the virtual absence of mouth bar deposits in parts of the basin previously filled by Type 1 deltas active earlier in the cyclothem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>] (Section 4.2). Given their stratigraphic position later in the cyclothems closer to the eustatic minimum, it was probably a combination of limited accommodation space and rapidly falling sea level which influenced delta sedimentation. This supports their interpretation as the deposits of highly forced regressions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>].</p><p>The common element in most of the Type 3 deltaic sequences is the very coarse and commonly pebbly nature of much of the channel fill sediments. Many also show significant incision, greater than could result by normal channel erosion processes (Section 4.1). The deeply incised channel fills associated with deep water deltas; late Pendleian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4); late Kinderscoutian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7) and Mid Marsdenian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9); have previously been interpreted as incised valley deposits, eroded close to the eustatic minimum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref102">102</xref>]. The current view is that the deep incision may relate to a combination of deep water at the delta front and very high discharge rates. However the mechanism for deep incision is still poorly understood and the deeply incised channels in the older Rothley and Shaftoe Grits and Grit Sills (Section 5.1; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) were formed well back from the delta front.</p><p>There are a number of possible explanations for the variable development of the different cyclothem types in the Caledonian fluvial system.</p><p>1) The coarser grained channel fills in the Type 2 and Type 3 delta sequences may have developed as a result of tectonic uplift in the source area. Because coarse grained fills are also commonly seen in different fluvial systems in different sedimentary basins (Section 5.6), more than one source area would have to have been uplifted at the same time; perhaps possible if the uplift was related to widespread plate movements. Another difficulty is the stratigraphic distribution of the complex cyclothems. For instance, it may be possible to correlate the incoming of complex cyclothems in the late Kinderscoutian (Section 5.4) with tectonic uplift of the sediment source area, but why the sudden termination at the end of the Kinderscoutian? This could not be explained by tectonic processes, but could possibly result from delta switching. From late Marsdenian through into the Langsettian there is a repeated alternation of complex and simple cyclothems (Section 5; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0). A tectonic explanation seems unlikely. Another difficulty is that it fails to explain why the coarsest sediments (Type 3 deltas) only occur towards the ends of the cyclothems. Clearly some other factor must be at play.</p><p>2) Northern England forms the western extension of a more extensive sedimentary basin which occupied the greater part of the present day North Sea area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The absence of coarser (Types 2 and 3) delta deposits in the simple cyclothems seen in Northern England could result from delta switching into a part of the basin which underlies the present offshore area. This was suggested by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref12">12</xref>] as a possible explanation for the predominantly finer grained interval (simple cyclothems) spanning the Chokierian up to the beginning of the late Kinderscoutian (Section 5.3; Figures 16-18). There is only limited well penetration through this interval in the North Sea area, and hardly any detailed stratigraphic control because of the scarecity of cored marine bands with goniatites. The data available (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8) shows that some wells do have a more sandy sequence, but overall, the gamma ray log data do not show an abundance of thick channel fill deposits which are characteristic of complex cyclothems. The contrast with the very coarse grained late Kinderscoutian succession and the underlying one is readily apparent. Other possible areas for delta switching include the Dutch and Danish sectors of the North Sea (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>); there is little well penetration through this interval, but what there is shows no evidence for diversion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref194">194</xref>]. The deltas could have been restricted to an area further north known as the Mid North Sea High (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), where any Namurian and early Westphalian sediments previously deposited have been eroded. This remains possible, but seems unlikely.</p><p>3) The variable development over time of the two cylothems types is related to changes in climate. Two climate models for the tropical late Paleozoic (late Carboniferous to early Permian), have been proposed. Either the tropics experienced a wetter and less seasonal precipitation regime during glacial (lowstand) intervals than during interglacial (highstand) intervals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref195">195</xref>] , or a drier and more seasonal precipitation regime during glacial (lowstand) intervals than during interglacial (highstand) intervals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref196">196</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref197">197</xref>]. The climatic evidence from the older northern England succession is closer to the latter model.</p><p>The NW European Namurian-early Langsettian succession was deposited close to the equator (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>); contains coals throughout and lacks evidence of aridity, suggesting an ever-wet climate. The catchment area of much of the Greenland Caledonides, c7.5˚ - 20˚ North [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref30">30</xref>] probably had a different climate. The northern England succession with its multiple complex cyclothems demonstrates that there must have been significant rainfall in the Caledonian mountains. During the glacial maximum, when greenhouse gas levels and sea level decreased, it may have been much drier in that area, in which case the Caledonian river system could have been largely inactive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref74">74</xref>]. This is supported by late Carboniferous climate modeling which suggests that glacials were drier than interglacials in most areas, as both relate to moisture availability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref198">198</xref>]. During the succeeding deglaciation rainfall increased but was highly seasonal.</p><p>The Pangean supercontinent was prone to large seasonal changes in heating that may have driven intense monsoons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref199">199</xref>]. Climate modeling studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref198">198</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref200">200</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref201">201</xref>] have demonstrated the possibility of very strong summer rainfall over Pangea in the northern hemisphere tropics. In most of the model simulations, changes in the Pangaean monsoon are the primary control on the spatial pattern of tropical precipitation variability, and thus of tropical precipitation away from the Equator. Changing orbital forcing can significantly enhance or diminish monsoon intensity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref47">47</xref>]. High summer insolation strengthens the monsoon, while low summer insolation suppresses it. The impact of sub 100Ky orbital parameters was modeled by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref200">200</xref>]. With an eccentric orbit (enhanced precession) and the longitude of perihelion around southern summer, the ITCZ was located at 20<sup>0</sup> north. Strong south easterly winds drew moisture from the Paleo-Tethys across north-eastern Pangea. The Greenland catchment area lay 4000 km from that ocean and the inferred elevated rainfall area was much further west than in the climate models of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref198">198</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref200">200</xref>]. However, these models were based on an early Permian palaeogeography, by which time the equator had shifted well to the south of its Namurian position (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and the climate over Greenland would have been more arid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref197">197</xref>]. Detailed climate models for the Namurian are not yet available.</p><p>This interpretation of the Carboniferous climate suggests similarities with the end of the last Pleistocene glacial cycle, where orbital forcing parameters can be reliably back-calculated and rainfall variability is better documented. Strong monsoon rainfall relates to summer insolation maxima during a strong precession period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref202">202</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref203">203</xref>]. More recent studies on variability of Indian summer monsoon rainfall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref204">204</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref205">205</xref>] suggest that as summer insolation increased at the end of the LGM there was an accompanying increase in rainfall. A similar pattern is seen over the Sahara which is at comparable latitude to the paleo-latitude of a significant part of the catchment area of the Caledonian deltas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). After the peak of the last glaciation (21Ka, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(A), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) there were changes to the pattern of monsoon circulation leading eventually to the onset of the African humid period at about 12Ka [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref206">206</xref>] , with accompanying major changes in vegetation. This also triggered the reactivation of a large river system in the Western Sahara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref207">207</xref>]. These rainfall patterns are seen in spite of the post LGM deglaciation coming at the end of a long-eccentricity cycle with weaker eccentricity and precession (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(B), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(C)).</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Detailed Climate History</title><p>The climatic interpretation of different cyclothem types outlined above allows the stratigraphic distribution of these to be used to provide evidence of possible climatic variation over longer periods of time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3). The underlying assumption is that the complex cyclothems were deposited during climates with more ice accumulation, greater fall in sea level, and greater rainfall variability.</p><p>The earliest part of the Pendleian represented by the Great Limestone and in basinal areas by the complex C. leion MB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) (Climate Period 1) is a possible non-glacial interval. Following an inferred relatively warm period with simple cyclothems (Climate Period II), evidence for further cooling is first seen in late E1b (P5) with the forced Type 1 delta, represented by the Uldale Sill and Jackdoor Crags [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref85">85</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4). The Firestone Sill [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref208">208</xref>] , a thick ganister, on the Alston Block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) is further evidence for a significant sea-level fall.This is followed by a number of complex cyclothems (Climate Period III). The Ashover succession (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref72">72</xref>] lacks thick-shelled goniatites in the middle to late Pendleian interval. This is possibly because lower world sea-levels during this inferred cold period of more extensive ice accumulation, resulted in too shallow waters for goniatite survival in this shelf area.</p><p>The suggested evidence for a colder interval (Climate Period III) from late Pendleian to early Arnsbergian contradicts the oxygen isotope work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref209">209</xref>]. They examined brachiopods from the Woodland Borehole on the Alston Block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) over a late Pendleian stratigraphic interval from the Faraday House Shell Bed up to the Rookhope Shell Bed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) and concluded, from the negative values obtained that there were no widespread ice-caps during this period. This contradiction between the decrease in equatorial isotope values and evidence of extending southern hemisphere glaciations in the Serpukhovian has been noted elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref48">48</xref>] who suggested that tropical epicontinental seaways may not have been as well mixed as the open oceans. Another factor to consider in the Pennine Basin is that the Alston Block was subject to extensive late Carboniferous mineralization with probable elevated associated heat flows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref210">210</xref>]. Other isotope analyses in northern England [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref211">211</xref>] led to the conclusion that elevated heat flows associated with this mineralization could have led to the overprinting of earlier sea-water derived isotope values.</p><p>In Climate Period IV, (Cyclothems AR3-CH6), nineteen cyclothems are recognized in Northern England and only four of them are complex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6). The succession is interpreted as a predominantly warm period punctuated by a few more extreme glacial cycles. In Climate Period V, (Cyclothems AL1-K10), all sixteen cyclothems are simple (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7). This succession is interpreted as a prolonged period when glacial-related cyclicity continued, but sea-level fluctuations were modest and probably had the warmest climate since the early Pendleian.</p><p>The beginning of Climate Period VI (Cyclothems K9 or K11-K15) marks a major climatic change. The five cyclothems in the late Kinderscoutian are all complex. Regressive sequences are also seen in Ireland and mainland Europe (Section 5.4). The absence of thick-shelled goniatites in the R1c2, 3 and 4 marine bands of the Ashover boreholes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) succession [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref72">72</xref>] is again regarded as evidence that water depths over the Ashover shelf were too shallow for goniatites, during a period of inferred lower world sea levels. The sedimentology of this interval also suggests a significantly colder than average climate. Climate Period VII (Cylothems M1-M4) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9) starts with the B. gracilis transgression and was warmer; whilst Climate Period VIII, with mainly complex cyclothems, M5-M8 and with goniatites again absent over the Ashover Shelf area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) marks a return to the colder climatic conditions of the late Kinderscoutian. The B. superbilinguis transgression delineates the start of Climate Period IX.This is a more variable interval with alternating simple and complex cyclothems (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0).</p><p>The similarity in the development of coarse and commonly incised channel fills in the late Namurian and early Langsettian sequences in different sedimentary systems and fluvial sources (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) is a strong indication of a global climatic control. This does not just relate to variable sea-level fluctuations, but also suggests synchronous climatic variation in different fluvial catchment areas. Major marine bands from G. cumbriense in the late Namurian to A. amaliae in the Langsettian, the majority of them with two or three thick-shelled goniatite horizons, occur in every fourth cyclothem, suggesting a possible long eccentricity beat, as also proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref19">19</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Stratigraphic distribution of major coarse channel sandstones</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Complex Cyclothems in the Pennine Basin (Include Type 2 &amp; 3 delta sequences)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of other basins with incised &amp; major coarse channels in same cycle</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Milnrow/Crutchman Sst</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (Ruhr)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Helpet Edge Rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (Ruhr, Ireland, S. Wales)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Harrock Hill Grit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (Ruhr, Belgium, S. Wales)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woodhead Hill Rock/Ousel Nest Grit/Crawshaw Sst.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (South Wales)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rough Rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (Ruhr, Cornwall, South Wales, 2 systems)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chatsworth Grit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (Ruhr)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roaches &amp; Upper Ashover Grits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (Ruhr)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower Ashover Grit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (Ruhr)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kinderscout Grit (5 cycles)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (Belgium, Aachen, Clare)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The suggested climatic history outlined above is complex, not surprising over a period of at least 12 My. There were clearly a number of influences, some as yet unknown. The interpreted sea level curve presented (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) differs from previous curves, such as that by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref212">212</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref213">213</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref214">214</xref>] which is reproduced in several later climate studies. Their curve shows a prolonged period of eustatic low sea level beginning at the base of the Chokierian and extending until Westphalian D. This includes the interval described above (Alportian to base late Kinderscoutian, Climate Period V) which is interpreted in this study as the Namurian climatic optimum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6). The Ross and Ross curve for the Namurian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref212">212</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref213">213</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref214">214</xref>] is largely based on papers by Ramsbottom, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref71">71</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref145">145</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref146">146</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref170">170</xref>] who believed that non-sequences in this interval over the northern part of the Pennine Basin; Stainmore, Alston and Northumberland (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6) represented long periods of low sea levels. These were correlated with other stratigraphic gaps worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref71">71</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref215">215</xref>]. The current interpretation is that the non-sequences in the northern part of the Pennine Basin are caused by very low rates of subsidence which severely reduced accommodation space and are unrelated to sea levels. An unconformity is commonly seen at this horizon in other basins, such as the Upper Silesian Basin, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>].</p><p>A possible climate model for the complex cyclothems suggests they commonly correspond to periods when eccentricity modulated precessional orbital forcing was stronger. These were associated with enhanced precession related, seasonal rainfall during deglaciation (Type 3 delta sequences). This then declined and during the ensuing marine bands there was little delta progradation. As ice accumulation started again, falling sea-levels began to pull the deltas (Type 1 sequences) into the basin, but later strong (precessional?) forcing events produced sea-level rises sufficient to flood them. Accelerating sea level falls close to the eustatic minimum pulled the deltas (Type 2 sequences) back into the basin. Aridity of the catchment area during glacial maximum then starved these deltas of sediment supply.</p><p>The coarser incised channel fills in the Ruhr succession [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>] (Section 4.3) could have a variety of origins. The basin may have been close enough to the main catchment area (Variscan Mountains, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) for knick point recession during the eustatic minimum of colder cyclothems to increase the fluvial gradient back into the source area, allowing a coarser bedload to be transported. An alternative explanation is provided by the climate model of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref200">200</xref>] which suggests high precipitation over the Variscan Mountains in association with strong monsoons at times of strong precession. However, these same monsoons could also have been supplying high seasonal rainfall to the Caledonian fluvial catchment area further to the north (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In this scenario there would have been contemporaneous deposition of the coarser grained channel sediments from the different catchment areas; in which case, the Ruhr coarse grained channel deposits accumulated during the early deglaciation period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(C)), a little later in the cyclothem than suggested by [14 ] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref16">16</xref>]. Conversely simple cyclothems in the later Namurian and Langsettian were deposited during less cold periods of low eccentricity and lesser modulation of precession. Sea level fluctuations were more modest and climate changes in the catchment area less extreme, although rainfall in the Caledonian catchment area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) was probably still seasonal, as in the same latitudes in the present. The simple and complex cyclothems would have varied systematically through long-eccentricity (400Ky) cycles, in response to variations in orbital forcing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(B), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(C)).</p><p>This climate change model best fits Climate Periods VII to IX (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0) where regular alternations of complex and simple cyclothems occur. This pattern is not seen, or is poorly developed, in the earlier Namurian. The late Kinderscoutian (Climate Period VI) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7), which contains five recognized cyclothems, must have been deposited over more than one long eccentricity (400 Ky) cycle. Climate Period V (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7) with sixteen cyclothems had a more stable climate. Changes in orbital forcing alone cannot explain these longer term climatic trends.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Comparison between the Southern Hemisphere and the North West Europe Successions</title><p>Known Namurian glacial deposits in the Southern Hemisphere are quite restricted (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1); there were probably multiple glaciated areas at times, but their full extent remains unknown because of gaps in the stratigraphic record and no exposure. No Namurian glacial deposits have yet been discovered in present-day Antarctica and at least part of the continent (Trans-Antarctic Mountains) is believed to have been ice free [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref49">49</xref>]. The early Namurian is missing in South Africa and the age of the earliest glacial deposits remains uncertain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref216">216</xref>]. The extensive Upper Carboniferous glacial sequences in Brazil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) have</p><p>radiometric and palynological ages suggesting they are probably all younger than the Namurian to early Langsettian sequence discussed in this paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref217">217</xref>] , although the age of the oldest deposits again remains uncertain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref218">218</xref>]. Further away from the various possible polar positions, late Namurian glacial sediments, with associated Levipustula brachiopod fauna, are known from a number of basins in south-western South America (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref219">219</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref220">220</xref>] , although many of these are interpreted as valley glacier deposits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref218">218</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref221">221</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref222">222</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref223">223</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref224">224</xref>] , and the western Australian Perth Basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref225">225</xref>] , although their age is poorly constrained. In Tibet glacigenic sediments underlie shales with a Levipustula fauna and are probably Namurian in age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref226">226</xref>] , although they could be Visean.</p><p>The best documented Namurian glacial deposits so far discovered are found in eastern Australia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref4">4</xref>]. These allow a detailed southern hemisphere glacial chronology for the Upper Carboniferous and a number of correlations have been proposed with the UK (Pennine) succession [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref231">231</xref>] and also with the Donetsk Basin succession [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref20">20</xref>]. The area had a relatively distal location from the Pole (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1) and the Australian successions probably record major ice-age periods when glaciations were more extensive. A new correlation between the Southern Hemisphere and NW Europe is proposed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2). It is not possible, at present, to accurately correlate the Southern Hemisphere and European sequences using biostratigraphy. The oldest Australian ice-age period (C1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) is represented by the Spion Cop Conglomerate, the restricted nature of the sequence suggesting deposition by valley glaciers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref3">3</xref>]. An age range of 325.5 - 326.5 Ma, on the year 2000 time scale of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref232">232</xref>] , or slightly</p><p>older using the year 2004 time scale of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref233">233</xref>] has been suggested [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref4">4</xref>]. This placed it in the early Pendleian, assuming the base of the Pendleian is dated at about 326 my. However, a more recent U-Pb age date from the West Silesian Basin of 328.84 Ma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) has goniatite control which probably places it in Pendleian Zone E1b, although C. malhamense (Base E1c) has not been recorded in this basin. A U-Pb radiometric date from a Pendleian aged tuff in the Donetsk Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) is dated at 328.14 &#177; 0.11 Ma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref234">234</xref>]. These dates push the base of the Pendleian back to at least 329.2 Ma in the year 2012 timescale of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>] , (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and possibly older. If these new dates are reasonably accurate, and they have been questioned [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref120">120</xref>] , then the currently published radiometric dates suggest the Spion Cop Conglomerate is probably younger than basal Pendleian and more likely correlates with the first of the Namurian major colder periods (III), suggested in this paper, which can be accurately dated as late Pendleian to early Arnsbergian (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2). Two tuffs which lie just below and just above the Enna MB in the Upper Silesian Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), which is probably the C. cowlingense MB (=early Arnsbergian, E2a1), have dates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref116">116</xref>] at 327&#177;0.33Ma and 325.58&#177;0.26Ma (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2).</p><p>The second ice-age period (C2) lasted for 3 My, using the year 2000 time scale of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref232">232</xref>] three times as long as C1, or 4.5 My using the year 2004 time scale of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref233">233</xref>]. These deposits are also more extensive. The period has been placed largely in the Arnsbergian period of the European succession [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref4">4</xref>]. However, their suggested age ranges; 317.4 Ma to 321.9 Ma or 319.5 Ma to 322.5 Ma (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) depending on which time scale is used, indicates correlation with a younger part of the European Namurian succession using the more recent time scales of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref234">234</xref>] and ICS time scale of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref119">119</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). It seems more likely that C2 correlates, at least in part, with the major NW European colder periods (VI, VIII, IX) identified in this paper as being within the stratigraphic interval which ranges from late Kinderscoutian to early Langsettian. The age of the top of C2 (317.4 Ma or 319.5 Ma) is fairly close to the age of the top Namurian (318.5 Ma or 319.9 Ma) in the time scales of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref21">21</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref118">118</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). If this correlation is correct, then the European evidence suggests that the C2 ice-age period may have contained considerable variations in the intensity of glacial cycles and included a number of climatic ameliorations.</p><p>In South America glacial deposits in the Guandacol and Rio del Penon Formations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref220">220</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) overlie an unconformity and the timing of the beginning of the glaciation is close uncertain. It probably correlates with part of the C2 glacial episode in Australia. The overlying non-glacial sequence has late Namurian Pb/U ages of 318.79 Ma in the Paganzo Basin and 319.57 Ma in the Rio Blanco Basin. This correlates with parts of Climate Period IX in NW Europe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) which has alternating complex and simple cyclothems, and is inferred to be slightly warmer overall, than the earlier Period VIII.</p><p>The C3 ice-age period in Australia (315 - 317 Ma) is probably younger than the stratigraphic interval discussed in this paper and appears to correlate with the mid to late Langsettian of the European stratigraphy.</p><p>The continuous cyclical sequence in NW Europe suggests glaciations, with their associated eustatic sea-level fluctuations, persisted for most of the Namurian and early Langsettian interval discuused here (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) with the possible exception of the early Pendleian. The shaded area in Gondwanaland (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2) occurs within a latitude of 30˚ for all three possible pole positions in the late Namurian (320 Ma), but none of the currently known Namurian glacial deposits lies within it. It has been questioned whether the Namurian ice sheets were extensive enough for their fluctuations to provide sufficient sea-level variation to account for the equatorial cyclothems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref49">49</xref>]. Climate modeling suggests sea-level fluctuations of ≤50 m are possible with this ice-sheet distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref227">227</xref>]. Some of these areas were ice-free at times, eg. East Australia and western South America, but there may have been waxing and waneing ice sheets in other parts of Gondwanaland, their deposits having yet to be discovered, not exposed or removed by later erosion. The different climatic periods inferred from the NW European succession, therefore probably relate to the variable development of glaciations in different areas of Gondwanaland. There were probably more glaciated areas during inferred colder periods; eg III, VI and VIII, than during inferred warmer periods, such as periods I II and IV.</p>Climatic Change and Basin Filling<p>The Namurian deep-water Pennine Basin has four major phases of fill each associated with turbidite-fronted deltas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref106">106</xref>]. These phases appear to be all related to major glacial periods. The first (E1c-E2a) mainly corresponds to Climate Period III (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) which correlates with the C1 Glaciation in Australia. The second (R1c), correlates with Climate Period VI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3), the earliest phase of the C2 glaciation in Australia. The third and fourth periods (R2b) occur during Climate Period VIII, within the middle part of the C2 glaciation. During the last period (R2b4-R2b5) there was also a major progradation of the Ruhr deltas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119587-ref26">26</xref>]. These were all caused by a combination of factors related to the colder climate conditions; namely, larger than normal sea-level fluctuations and climate changes in the catchment areas. All of these basin fill phases experienced an influx of large volumes of sediment, so that the deltas were able to fill and prograde out into the previously under-filled deep-water basins. This was possible because of increased run-off brought about by a number of possible climate-related factors, as discussed earlier.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Summary</title><p>1) The Western European (Namurian to early Langsettian) sedimentary basins contain well correlated widely developed cyclothems. Recent age dates indicate average durations of c100Ky, comparable to cycle durations during the Pleistocene glaciations, which relate to short-eccentricity orbital forcing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>2) Cyclothems in the UK Pennine Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) contain up to three types of deltaic sequences which develop at difference stages during delta progradation, before and after the inferred eustatic minimum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Many (complex) cyclothems contain two or three delta sequence types, but in the majority (simple cyclothems) there is only one.</p><p>3) The stratigrapic distribution of simple and complex cyclothem types is not random. In the Namurian, the latter group together into three longer periods: late Pendleian, late Kinderscoutian and mid Marsdenian. These are associated with periods of major delta progradation in the UK Pennine Basin.</p><p>4) From the mid Marsdenian onwards there is a good correlation between complex cyclothems in the Pennine Basin and deltaic sequences in the same cyclothem in other West European sedimentary basins that show evidence of coarse grained fluvial input, commonly accompanied by incision. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0).</p><p>5) A revised correlation between the Western European and Southern Hemisphere shows that European stratigraphic intervals dominated by complex cyclothems are approximate age equivalents to known Southern Hemisphere glacial sequences.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>9. Conclusions</title><p>1) Four independent factors can be interpreted to suggest that the Namurian to Early Langsettian climate varied systematically between more and less extreme glacial periods. These are: the stratigraphic distribution of coarse-grained delta channels; the timing of the major periods of delta progradation; the presence of depth-related goniatite faunas in a shelfal part of the Pennine Basin and the stratigraphic distribution of glacial deposits in the Southern Hemisphere</p><p>2) Many of the cyclothems deposited during these colder periods contain evidence for significant rainfall variability in the fluvial catchment area (Greenland and Scandinavia?) of the Caledonian system, with intense, seasonal rainfall towards the end of the cyclothems. In the later Namurian and Langsettian, there is also evidence for increased run off in other fluvial catchment areas in Europe. Carboniferous climate modeling and comparisons with the late Pleistocene, has related this to strong precessional forcing.</p><p>3) Alternations between complex and simple cyclothems in the later Namurian and early Langsettian suggest a possible correlation with long eccentricity orbital forcing. This is not seen in the older Namurian and a long period with a relatively warm, more stable climate is inferred from the Alportian to the beginning of the late Kinderscoutian.</p><p>4) Within many cyclothems, shorter-period sea-level fluctuations are inferred from the flooding of early progradational deltas, variations in their sedimentology and marine bands with complex faunal variations. These are attributed to shorter period glacio-eustacy; comparisons with the late Pleistocene again suggests a possible relationship to precessional (c20Ky) orbital forcing.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I thank Ian Chisholm for making available some of his unpublished data, for numerous discussions in the field over many years and for his comments on an earlier verison of the manuscript. John Collinson has also reviewed various versions of the manuscript and provided many useful suggestions for improvement. Doug Holliday kindly showed me many key sections in Northumberland. I am also grateful for the comments of other anonymous referees who read earlier versions of this paper.</p><p>This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s12"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Jones, C.M. (2022) Climatic Influences on Upper Carboniferous (Serpukhovian to Mid-Bashkirian) Sedimentary Sequences in the UK Pennine and Other European Basins. International Journal of Geosciences, 13, 715-778. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2022.138038</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119587-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Du Toit</surname><given-names> A.L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1921</year>)<article-title>The Carboniferous Glaciation of South Africa</article-title><source> South African Journal of Geology</source><volume> 24</volume>,<fpage> 188</fpage>-<lpage>227</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lakin, J.A., Marshall, J.E.A., Troth, I. and Harding, I.C. (2016) Greenhouse to Icehouse: A Biostratigraphic Review of Latest Devonian-Mississippian Glaciations and Their Global Effects. In: Becker, R.T., K&amp;#246;nigshof, P. and Brett, C.E., Eds., Devonian Climate, Sea Level and Evolutionary Events, Geological Society of London Special Publication No. 423, London, 439-464. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP423.12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Fielding, C.R. Frank, T.D., Birgenheier, L.P., Rygel, M.C., Jones, A.T. and Roberts, J. (2008) Stratigraphic Record and Facies Associations of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Eastern Australia (New South Wales and Queensland). In: Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America Special Paper 441, London, 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(03)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D., Birgenheier, L.P., Rygel, M.C. and Jones, R.J. (2008) Stratigraphic Imprint of the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age in Eastern Australia: A Record of Alternating Glacial and Non-Glacial Climate Regime. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 165, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492007-036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wanless, H. and Shepard, F.P. (1936) Sea Level and Climatic Changes Related to Late Paleozoic Cycles. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 47, 1177-1206. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSAB-47-1177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Davies, S.J., Hampson, G.J., Flint, S.S. and Elliott, T. (1999) Continental-Scale Sequence Stratigraphy of the Namurian, Upper Carboniferous and Its Applications to Reservoir Prediction. In: Fleet, A.J. and Boldy, S.A.R., Eds., Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 5th Conference, Geological Society, London, 771-788.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Church, K.D. and Gawthorpe, R.L. (1994) High Resolution Sequence-Stratigraphy of the Late Namurian in the Widmerpool Gulf (East Midlands, UK). Marine and Petrololeum Geology, 11, 528-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(94)90066-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hampson, G.J. (1995) Discrimination of Regionally Extensive Coals in the Upper Carboniferous of the Pennine Basin, UK Using High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphic Concepts. In: Whateley, M.K.G. and Spears, D.A., Eds., European Coal Geology, Geological Society of London Special Publication No. 82, London, 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.082.01.04</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hampson, G.J. (1997) A Sequence Stratigraphic Model for Deposition of the Lower Kinderscout Delta, an Upper Carboniferous Turbidite-Fronted Delta. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 51, 273-296. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.51.4.273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hampson, G.J., Davies, S.J. Elliott, T., Flint, S.S. and Stollhofen, H. (1999) Incised Valley-Fill Sandstone Bodies in Upper Carboniferous Fluvio-Deltaic Strata: Recognition and Reservoir Characterisation of Southern North Sea Analogues. In: Fleet, A.J. and Boldy, S.A.R., Eds., Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 5th Conference, Geological Society, London, 771-788.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C.M. and Chisholm, J.I. (1997) The Roaches and Ashover Grits: Sequence-Stratigraphic Interpretation of a “Turbidite-Fronted Delta” System. Geological Journal, 32, 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1034(199703)32:1&lt;45::AID-GJ720&gt;3.0.CO;2-C</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Martinsen, O.J. (1993) Namurian (Late Carboniferous) Depositional Systems of the Craven-Askrigg Area, Northern England; Implications for Sequence-Stratigraphic Models. In: Posamentier, H.W., Summerhayes, C.P., Haq, B.U. and Allen, G.P., Eds., Stratigraphy and Facies Associations in a Sequence-Stratigraphic Framework, Special Publication 18, International Association Sedimentologists, Oxford, Blackwell, 247-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304015.ch14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maynard, J.R. (1992) Sequence Stratigraphy of the Upper Yeadonian of Northern England. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 9, 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(92)90091-R</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hampson, G.J., Stollhofen, H. and Flint, S.S. (1999) A Sequence-Stratigraphic Model for the Lower Coal Measures (Upper Carboniferous) of the Ruhr District, North-West Germany. Sedimentology, 46, 1199-1231. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.1999.00273.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Süss, M.P., Drozdzewski, G. and Schaefer, A. (2000) Sequenzstratigraphie des kohlefuehrenden Oberkarbons im Ruhr-Becken. Geologisches Jahrbuch A, 156, 45-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Süss, M.P., Drozdzewski, G. and Schaefer, A. (2002) The Ruhr and Aachen Basins; Sedimentary Environments, Sequence Stratigraphic Model, and Synsedimentary Tectonics of Variscan Foreland Basins (Namurian B/C to Westphalian C, W. Germany). In: Hills, L.V., Henderson, C.M. and Bamber, E.W., Eds., Carboniferous and Permian of the World, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Calgary, Memoir, 19, 208-227.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waksmundska, M.I. (2010) Sequence Stratigraphy of Carboniferous Paralic Deposits in the Lublin Basin (SE Poland). Acta Geologica Polonica, 60, 557-597. https://geojournals.pgi.gov.pl/agp/article/view/9961</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allen, J.P., Fielding, C.R., Gibling, M.R. and Ryget, M.C. (2011) Fluvial Response to Paleo-Equatorial Climate Fluctuations during the Late Paleozoic Ice Age. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 123, 1524-1538. https://doi.org/10.1130/B30314.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waters, C.N. and Condon, D.J. (2012) Nature and Timing of Late Mississippian to Mid-Pennsylvanian Glacio-Eustatic Sea-Level Changes of the Pennine Basin, UK. Journal of the Geological Society, 169, 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492011-047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eros, J.M., Monta&amp;#241;ez, I.P., Osleger, D.A., Davydov, V.I., Nemyrovska, T.I., Poletaev, V.I. amd Zhykalyak, M.V. (2012) Sequence Stratigraphy and Onlap History of the Donets Basin, Ukraine: Insight into Carboniferous Icehouse Dynamics. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 313-314, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.08.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Davydov, V.I., Korn, D. and Schmitz, M.D. (2012) The Carboniferous Period. In: Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D. and Ogg, G.M., Eds., The Geologic Time Scale 2012, Vol. 2, Elsevier, Oxford, 603-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59425-9.00023-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Leeder, M.R. and McMahon, A.H. (1988) Upper Carboniferous (Silesian) Basin Subsidence in Northern Britain. In: Besly, B.M. and Kelling, G., Eds., Sedimentation in a Synorogenic Basin Complex, Blackie, Glasgow, 43-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Collinson, J.D. (2005) Dinantian and Namurian Depositional Systems in the Southern North Sea. In: Collinson, J.D., Evans, D.J., Holliday, D.W. and Jones, N.S., Eds., Carboniferous Hydrocarbon Geology: The Southern North Sea and Surrounding Onshore Areas, Yorkshire Geological Society Occasional Publication, Yorkshire, No. 7, 35-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kearsey, T.I., Millward, D., Ellen, R., Whitbread, K. and Monaghan, A.A. (2018) Revised Stratigraphic Framework of Pre-Westphalian Carboniferous Petroleum System Elements from the Outer Moray Firth to the Silverpit Basin, North Sea, UK. In: Monaghan, A.A., Underhill, J.R., Hewett, A.J. and Marshall, J.E.A., Eds., Paleozoic Plays of NW Europe, Geological Society of London, London, Special Publication No. 471, 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP471.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kerske, D.I. and Schulz, H.M. (2015) Sedimentological and Diagenetic Controls of Gas in Lower and Early Upper Carboniferous Sediments, NE Germany. Sedimentary Geology, 325, 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.06.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kombrink, H., Besly, B., Collinson, J.D., Daan den Hartog, J., Drozdzewski, G., Dusar, M., Hoth, P., Pagnier, H., Stemmerik, L., Waksmundzka, M. and Wrede, V. (2009) Carboniferous, In: Doornenbal, J.C. and Stevenson, A.G., Eds., Petroleum Geological Atlas of the Southern Permian Basin, EAGE Publications b.v., Houten, 81-98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drozdzewski, G. (1992) The Ruhr Coal Basin (Germany): Structural Evolution of an Autochthonous Foreland Basin. International Journal of Coal Geology, 23, 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-5162(93)90050-K</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fiebig, H.E.R. (1971) Gesamtschichtenschnitt (overall-section) des Niederrheinisch-Westfaelischen Steinkohlengebietes (Stand 1970). Das Karbon in marin-paralischer Entwicklung. 7. International Congress, Stratigraphy, Geology, Carboniferous, Krefeld, Vol. 1, 29-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kullmann</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Ammonoideen des deutschen Oberkarbons</article-title><source> Courier Fors-chungsinstitut Senckenberg</source><volume> 254</volume>,<fpage> 25</fpage>-<lpage>30</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scotese, C.R. (2014) Atlas of Permo-Carboniferous Paleogeographic Maps (Mollweide Projection), Maps 53-64, Vol. 4, the Late Paleozoic, PALEOMAP Atlas for ArcGIS, PALEOMAP Project, Evanston, IL.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jouzel, J. (2013) A Brief History of Ice Core Science over the Last 50 yr. Climates of the Past, 9, 2525-2547. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2525-2013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Petit, J.R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N.I., Barnola, J.M., Basile, I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, J., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M., Kotyakov, V.M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V.Y., Lorius, C., Pépin, L., Ritz, C., Saltzman, E. and Stievenard, M. (1999) Climate and Atmospheric History of the Last 420,000 Years from the Vostock Ice-Core, Antarctica. Nature, 399, 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1038/20859</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hays, J.D., Imbrie, J. and Shackleton, N.J. (1976.) Variations in the Earth’s Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages. Science, 194, 1121-1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.194.4270.1121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lisiecki, L.E. and Raymo, M.E. (2005) A Plio-Pleistocene Stack of 57 Globally Distributed Benthic δ18O Records. Paleoceanography, 20, PA1003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siddal, M., Rohling, E.J., Almogi-Labin, A., Hemleben, Ch., Meischner, D., Schmelzer, I. and Smeed, D.A. (2003) Sea-Level Fluctuations during the Last Glacial Cycle. Nature, 423, 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01690</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Imbrie, J., Hays, J.D., Martinsen, D.G., McIntyre, A., Mix, A.C., Morley, J.J., Pisias, N.G. Prell, W.L. and Shackleton, N.J. (1984) The Orbital Theory of Pleistocene Climate: Support from a Revised Chronology, of the Marine δ18O Record. In: Berger, A. Ed., Milankovitch and Climate, Part 1, Springer, New York, 269-305.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elderfield, H., Ferretti, P., Greaves, M., Crowhurst, S., McCave, I.N., Hodell, D. and Piotrowski, A.M. (2012) Evolution of Ocean Temperature and Ice Volume through the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition. Science, 337, 704-709. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221294</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berger, A. and Loutre, M.F. (1991) Insolation Values for the Climate of the Last 10 Million Years. Quarterly Science Review, 10, 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-3791(91)90033-Q</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berger, A. Loutre, M.F. and Dehant, V. (1989) Influence of the Changing Lunar Orbit on the Astronomical Frequencies or Pre-Quaternary Insolation Patterns. Paleoceanography, 4, 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1029/PA004i005p00555</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berger, A., Loutre, M.F. and Laskar, J. (1992) Stability of the Astronomical Frequencies over the Earth’s History for Paleoclimate Studies. Science, 563, 560-566. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5044.560</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laskar, J., Joutel, F. and Boudin, F. (1993) Orbital, Precessional, and Insolation Quantities for the Earth from -20 Myr to +10 Myr. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 270, 522-533.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A.C. and Levrard, B. (2004) A Long-Term Numerical Solution for the Insolation Quantities of the Earth. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 428, 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laskar, J., Fienga, A., Gastineau, M. and Manche, H. (2011) La2010: A New Orbital Solution for the Long-Term Motion of the Earth. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 532, A89. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116836</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pharaoh, T.C., Vincent, C.J., Bentham, M.S., Hulbert, A.G., Waters, C.N. and Smith, N.J.P. (2011) Structure and Evolution of the East Midlands Region of the Pennine Basin. Subsurface Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waters, C.N., Millward, D. and Thomas, C.W. (2014) The Millstone Grit Group (Pennsylvanian) of the Northumberland-Solway Basin and Alston Block of Northern England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 60, 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs2014-341</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waters, C.N., Chisholm, J.I., Benfield, A.C. and O’Beirne, A.M. (2008) Regional Evolution of a Fluvio-Deltaic Succession in the Marsdenian (Late Namurian Stage, Pennsylvanian) of the Central Pennine Basin, UK. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 57, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.57.1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruddiman, W.R. (2003) Orbital Insolation, Ice Volume and Greenhouse Gases. Quaternary Science Review, 22, 1597-1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00087-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Frank, T.D., Birgenheier, L.P., Monta&amp;#241;ez, I.P., Fielding, C.R. and Rygel, M.C. (2008) Late Paleozoic Climate Dynamics Revealed by Comparison of Ice-Proximal and Ice-Distal Straigraphic Records. In: Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America Special Paper 441, Boulder, 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(23)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Isbell, J.L., Miller, M.F., Wolfe, K.L. and Lenaker, P.L. (2003) Timing of Late Paleozoic Glaciation in Gondwana, Was Glaciation Responsible for the Northern Hemisphere Cyclothems? In: Chan, M.A. and Archer, A.W., Eds., Extreme Depositional Environments: Mega end Members in Geological Time, Geological Society of America Special Paper 370, Boulder, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2370-1.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berner, R.A. (2003) The Long-Term Carbon Cycle, Fossil Fuels, and Atmospheric Composition. Nature, 426, 323-326. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02131</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crowley, T.J. and Baum, S.K. (1992) Modeling Late Paleozoic Glaciation. Geology, 20, 507-510. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020&lt;0507:MLPG&gt;2.3.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hallsworth, C.R., Morton, A.C., Claoué-Long, J.C. and Fanning, C.M. (2000) Carboniferous Sand Provenance in the Pennine Basin, UK: Constraints from Heavy Mineral and SHRIMP Zircon Age Data. Sedimentary Geology, 137, 147-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(00)00153-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hallsworth, C.R. and Chisholm, J.I. (2000) Stratigraphic Evolution of Provenance Characteristics in Westphalian Sandstones of the Yorkshire Coalfield. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 53, 43-72. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.53.1.43</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hallsworth, C.R. and Chisholm, J.I. (2008) Provenance of Late Carboniferous Sandstones in the Pennine Basin (UK) from Combined Heavy Mineral, Garnet Geochemistry and Palaeocurrent Studies. Sedimentary Geology, 203, 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.11.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cliff, R.A., Drewery, S.E. and Leeder, M.R. (1991) Source Lands for the Carboniferous Pennine River System: Constraints from Sedimentary Evidence and U-Pb Geochronology Using Zircon and Monazite. In: Morton, A.C., Todd, S.P. and Haughton, P.D.W., Eds., Developments in Sedimentary Provenance Studies, Geological Society of London, London, Special Publication 57, 137-159. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1991.057.01.12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lancaster, P., Daly, S.J., Strong, C.D. and Morton, A.C. (2017) Interrogating the Provenance of Large River Systems, Multi-Proxy In-Situe Analysis in the Millstone Grit, Yorkshire. Journal of the Geological Society, 174, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2016-069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morton, A.C., Claoué-Long, J.C. and Hallsworth, C. (2001) Zircon Age and Heavy Mineral Constraints on Provenance of North Sea Carboniferous Sandstones. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 18, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(00)00065-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morton, A.C. and Whitam, A.G. (2002) The Millstone Grit of Northern England: A Response to Tectonic Evolution of a Northern Sourceland. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 54, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.54.1.47</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tyrrell, S., Haughton, P.D.W., Daly, J.S., Kokfelt, T.F. and Gagnevin, D. (2006) The Use of the Common Pb Isotope Composition of Detrital K-Feldspar Grains as a Provenance Tool and Its Application to Upper Carboniferous Paleodrainage, Northern England. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 76, 324-345. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2006.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chisholm, J.I. and Hallsworth, C.R. (2005) Provenance of Upper Carboniferous Sandstones in East Derbyshire: Role of the Wales-Brabant High. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 55, 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.55.3.209</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hallsworth, C.R. and Chisholm, J.I. (2017) Interplay of Mid-Carboniferous Sediment Sources on the Northern Margin of the Wales Brabant High. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 61, 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs2017-382</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morton, A.C., Waters, C., Fanning, M., Chisholm, J.I. and Brettle, M. (2014) Origin of Carboniferous Sandstones Fringing the Northern Margin of the Wales-Brabant Massif: Insights from Detrital Zircon Ages. Geological Journal, 50, 553-574. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.2572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trewin, N.H. and Holdsworth, B.K. (1972) Sedimentation in the Lower Namurian Rocks of the North Staffordshire Basin. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 39, 371-408. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.39.3.371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">George, G.T. (2000) Characterisation and High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of Storm Dominated Braid Delta and Shoreface Sequences from the Basal Grit Group (Namurian) of the South Wales Variscan Peripheral Foreland Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 17, 445-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(00)00003-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">George, G.T. (2001) Late Yeadonian (Upper Sandstone Group) Incised Valley Supply and Depositional Systems in the South Wales Peripheral Foreland Basin: Implications for the Evolution of the Culm Basin and for the Silesian Hydrocarbon Plays of Onshore and Offshore UK. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 18, 671-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(01)00020-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McLean, D. and Chisholm, J.I. (1996) Reworked Palynomorphs as Provenance Indicators in the Yeadonian of the Pennine Basin. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 51, 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.51.2.141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">McCann, T., Skomski, E., Poty, E., Dusar, M., Vozárová, A., Schneider, J., Wetzel, A., Krainer, K., Kornpihl, K., Sch&amp;#228;fer, A., Krings, M., Oplusti, S. and Tait, J. (2008) Carboniferous. In: McCann, T., Ed., The Geology of Central Europe, Vol. 1, Precambrian and Palaeozoic, Geological Society of London Memoir, London, 411-530. https://doi.org/10.1144/CEV1P.9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hedemann, H.A. and Teichmüller, R. (1971) The Paleogeographical Development of the Upper Carboniferous. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland Und Westfalen, 6, 132-145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Korejwo</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1969</year>)<article-title>Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography of the Namurian in the Polish Lowland</article-title><source> Acta Geologica Polonica</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 609</fpage>-<lpage>709</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Korejwo</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1986</year>)<article-title>Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous Deposits of the Swidnik Blocks (Lublin Coal Basin)</article-title><source> Acta Geologica Polonica</source><volume> 36</volume>,<fpage> 337</fpage>-<lpage>346</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ramsbottom, W.H.C. (1981) Eustatic Control in Carboniferous Ammonoid Biostratigraphy. In: House, M.R. and Senior, J.R., Eds., The Ammonoidea, Academic Press, London and New York, 369-388.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramsbottom</surname><given-names> W.H.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Rhys G. and Smith</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1962</year>)<article-title>Boreholes in the Carboniferous of the Ashover district Derbyshire</article-title><source> Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Great Britain</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 75</fpage>-<lpage>168</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stevenson, I.P. and Gaunt, G.D. (1971) Geology of the Country around Chapel en-le-Frith. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Sheet 99. (England and Wales)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C.M. (2014) Controls on Deltaic Sedimentation in Glacio-Eustatic Cycles of Late Marsdenian (Namurian R2b4 to R2c1, Pennsylvanian) Age in the UK Central Pennine Basin. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 60, 63-83. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs2014-343</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Collinson, J.D. (1988) Controls on Namurian Sedimentation in the Central Province Basins of Northern England. In: Besly, B.M. and Kelling, G., Eds., Sedimentation in a Synorogenic Basin Complex: The Upper Carboniferous of Northwest Europe, Blackie, Glasgow &amp; London, 85-101.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elliot T. (1976) Sedimentary Sequences from the Upper Limestone Group of Northumberland. Scottish Journal of Geology, 12, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg12020115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turner, J.R. and Tester, G.N. (2006) The Table Rocks Sandstone: A Fluvial, Friction-Dominated Lobate Mouth Bar Sandbody in the Westphalian B Coal Measures, NE England. Sedimentary Geology, 190, 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.05.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bristow, C.S. (1988) Controls on the Sedimentation of the Rough Rock Group (Namurian) from the Pennine Basin of Northern England. In: Besley, B.M. and Kelling, G., Eds., Sedimentation in a Synorogenic Basin Complex, Blackie, Glasgow, 114-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bristow, C.S. (1993) Sedimentology of the Rough Rock: A Carboniferous Braided River Sheet Sandstone in Northern England. In: Best, J.I. and Bristow, C.S., Eds., Braided Rivers, Geological Society of London Special Publication 75, London, 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.075.01.18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davies, S.J. and McLean, D. (1996) Spectral Gamma Ray and Palynological Characterisation of Marine Bands in the Kinderscoutian (Namurian, Late Carboniferous) of the Pennine Basin. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 51, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.51.2.103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brettle, M.J. (2001) Sedimentology and High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of Shallow Water Delta Systems in the Early Marsdenian (Namurian) Pennine Basin, Northern England. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brettle, M.J. (2002) Shallow-Water Mouth Bar and Fluvial Depositional Systems in the Late Namurian Huddersfield Sub-Basin. Field Guide, Field Trip 3. Yorkshire Geological Society, Yorkshire, 73-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Guion, P.D., Fulton, I.M. and Jones, N.S. (1995) Sedimentary Facies of the Coal-Bearing Westphalian A and B North of the Wales-Brabant High. In: Whateley, M.K.G. and Spears, D.A., Eds., European Coal Geology, Geological Society of London Special Publication 82, London, 45-78. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.082.01.03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brandon, A., Aitkenhead, N., Crofts, R.G., Evans, D.J. and Riley, N.J. (1998) Geology of the Country around Lancaster. Memoir for Geological Sheet 59. (England and Wales)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Jones, M. (1995) Carboniferous Rocks of the Roman Wall and Haltwhistle Burn. In: Scrutton, C., Ed., Northumbrian Rocks &amp; Landscape, Yorkshire Geological Society, Yorkshire, 127-136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rowell, A.J. and Scanlon, J.E. (1957) The Namurian of the North-West Quarter of the Askrigg Block. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 31, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.31.1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hardy, P G. (1970) Aspects of Palaeoecology in Arenaceous Sediments of Upper Carboniferous Age in the Area around Manchester. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elliott, T. (1976) The Morphology, Magnitude and Regime of a Carboniferous Fluvial-Distributary Channel. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 46, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1306/212F6EBF-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reid, C.T. (1996) The Alportian and Kinderscoutian (Namurian) of North Yorkshire: The Sedimentary Response to Eustatic Variation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, Keele.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ainsworth, R.B., Vakarelov, B.K., Maceachern, J.A., Nanson, R.A., Lane, T.I., Franklin, R. and Shahin, E.D. (2016) Process-Driven Architectural Variability in Mouth-Bar Deposits: A Case Study from a Mixed-Process Mouth-Bar Complex, Drumheller, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 86, 512-541. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2016.23</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brettle, M.J., McIlroy, D., Elliott, T., Davies, S.J. and Waters, C.N. (2002) Identifying Cryptic Tidal Influences within Deltaic Successions: An Example from the Marsdenian (Namurian) Interval of the Pennine Basin, UK. Journal of the Geological Society, 159, 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764901-070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wells, M.R., Allison, P.A., Piggott, M.D., Pain, C.C., Hampson, G.J. and De Oliveira, C.R.E. (2005) Large Sea, Small Tides: The Late Carboniferous Seaway of NW Europe. Journal of the Geological Society, 162, 417-420. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764904-128</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okolo, S.A. (1982) A Sedimentologic-Stratigraphic Investigation of Marsdenian (Namurian R2a-b) Sediments in the Central Pennines. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, Keele.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Okolo, S.A. (1983) Fluvial Distributary Channels in the Fletcher Bank Grit (Namurian R2b) at Ramsbottom, Lancashire, England. In: Collinson, J.D. and Lewin, J., Eds., Modern and Ancient Fluvial Systems, Special Publication 6, International Association of Sedimentologists, Blackwell, 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444303773.ch34</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bristow, C.S. and Myers, K.J. (1989) Namurian Deltaic Succession: Sedimentology and Facies Analysis. In: Whateley, M.K.G. and Pickering, K.T., Eds., Deltas: Sites and Traps for Fossil Fuels, Geological Society of London Special Publication 41, London, 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.041.01.06</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maynard, J.R. and Leeder, M.R. (1992) On the Periodicity and Magnitude of Late Carboniferous Glacio-Eustatic Sea-Level Changes. Journal Geological Society, 149, 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.149.3.0303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C.M. (1977) The Sedimentology of Carboniferous Fluvial and Deltaic Sequences; the Roaches Grit Group in the South West Pennines and Pennant Sandstone of the Rhondda Valleys. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, Keele.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C.M. (1979) Tabular Cross-Bedding in Upper Carboniferous Fluvial Channel Sediments in the Southern Pennines, England. Sedimentary Geology, 24, 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(79)90030-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">O’Mara, P.T., Merryweather, M., Stockwell, M. and Bowler, M.M. (2003) The Trent Gas Field, Block 43/24a, UK North Sea. In: Gluyas, J.G. and Hichens, H.M., Eds., United Kingdom Oil and Gas Fields Commemorative Millennium Volume, Geological Society of London Memoir 20, London, 835-849. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.MEM.2003.020.01.70</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Guion, P.D. and Fielding, C.R. (1988) Westphalian A and B Sedimentation in the Pennine Basin, UK. In: Besly, B.M. and Kelling, G., Eds., Sedimentation in a Synorogenic Basin Complex, the Upper Carboniferous of Northwest Europe, Blackie and Son, London, 153-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baines, J.G. (1977) The Stratigraphy and Sedimentology of the Skipton Moor Grits (Namurian E1c) and Their Lateral Equivalents. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, Keele.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bijkerk, J.F. (2014) External Controls on Sedimentary Sequences: A Field and Analogue Modeling-Based Study. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collinson, J.D. (1968) Deltaic Sedimentation Units in the Upper Carboniferous of Northern England. Sedimentology, 10, 233-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1968.tb00833.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C.M. and McCabe, P.J. (1980) Erosion Surfaces within Giant Fluvial Cross-Beds of the Carboniferous in Northern England. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 50, 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7A63-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCabe, P.J. (1977) Deep Distributary Channels and Giant Bedforms in the Upper Carboniferous of the Central Pennines, Northern England. Sedimentology, 24, 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1977.tb00257.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C.M. (1980) Deltaic Sedimentation in the Roaches Grit and Associated Sediments (Namurian R2b) in the South-West Pennines. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 43, 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.43.1.39</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunham, K.C. (1990) Geology of the Northern Pennine Orefield, Vol. 1, Tyne to Stainmore. 2nd Edition, Economic Memoir of the British Geological Survey, London, Sheets 19 and 25, Parts 13, 14, 26, 31 and 32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, N.S. (1996) Report on the Sedimentology of Namurian Strata Examined at Selected Localities on the Morpeth and Rothbury Sheets. British Geological Survey Technical Report Stratigraphy Series, WH/96/871. Unpublished.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, B. and Lawrence, D.J.D. (2002) Geology of the Morpeth District: A Brief Explanation of the Geological Map Sheet 14 Morpeth. BGS, Keyworth, Nottingham.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, B. and Lawrence, D.J.D. (2002) Geology of the Morpeth District: Short Description of the British Geological Survey 1:50,000 Sheet 14 Morpeth.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Holdsworth, B.K. and Collinson, J.D. (1988) Millstone Grit Cyclicity Revisited. In: Besly, B.M. and Kelling, G., Eds., Sedimentation in a Synorogenic Basin Complex: The Upper Carboniferous of Northwest Europe, Blackie, Glasgow, 132-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramsbottom, W.H.C., Calver, M.A., Eagar, R.M.C., Hodson, F., Holliday, D.W., Stubblefield, C.J. and Wilson, R.B. (1978) A Correlation of Silesian Rocks in the British Isles. Geological Society of London, London, Special Reports 10, 1-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Read, W.A. (1994) High-Frequency, Glacio-Eustatic Sequences in Early Namurian Coal-Bearing Fluviodeltaic Deposits, Central Scotland. In: de Boer, P.G. and Smith, D.G., Eds., Special Publication of the International Association of Sedimentologists 19, Wiley, Hoboken, 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304039.ch25</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gastaldo, R.A., Purkynova, E., Simunek, Z. and Schmitz, M.D. (2009) Ecological Persistence in the Late Mississippian (Serpukhovian, Namurian A) Megafloral Record of the Upper Silesian Basin, Czech Republic. PALAIOS, 24, 336-350. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2008.p08-084r</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gastaldo, R.A., Purkynova, E. and Simunek, Z. (2009) Megafloral Perturbation across the Enna Marine Zone in the Upper Silesian Basin Attests to Late Mississippian (Serpukhovian) Deglaciation and Climate Change. PALAIOS, 24, 351-366. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2007.p07-027r</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jirásek, J., Oplustil, S., Sivek, M., Schmitz, M. and Abels, H.A. (2018) Astronomical Forcing of Carboniferous Paralic Sedimentary Cycles in the Upper Silesian Basin, Czech Republic (Serpukhovian, Latest Mississippian): New Radiometric Ages Afford an Astronomical Age Model for European Biozonations and Substages. Earth-Science Review, 177, 715-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peterson, J.A. (2011) Better Mathematical Constraints on Ages of Carboniferous Stage Boundaries Using Radiometric Tuff Dates and Cyclostratigraphy. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12, Q0AA15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003467</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pointon, M.A., Chew, D.M., Ovtcharova, M., Sevastopulo, G.D. and Crowley, Q.G. (2012) New High-Precision U-Pb Dates from Western European Carboniferous Tuffs; Implications for Time Scale Calibration, the Periodicity of Late Carboniferous Cycles and Stratigraphical Correlation. Journal of the Geological Society, 169, 713-721. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2011-092</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cohen, K.M., Harper, D.A.T. and Gibbard, P.L. (2018) ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart 2018/10. International Commission on Stratigraphy, IUGS. https://www.stratigraphy.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menning, M. (2018) The Stratigraphic Table of Germany 2016 (STG 2016). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft, 169, 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1127/zdgg/2018/0161</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Drozdzewski</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Zur sediment&amp;#228;ren entwicklung des subvariscikums im Namurium und Westfalium Nordwestdeutschlands</article-title><source> Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg</source><volume> 254</volume>,<fpage> 271</fpage>-<lpage>326</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Read, W.A. and Dean, J.M. (1967) A Quantitative Study of a Sequence of Coal-Bearing Cycles in the Namurian of Central Scotland. Sedimentology, 9, 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1967.tb01335.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bott, M.H.P. and Johnson, G.A.L. (1967) The Controlling Mechanism of Carboniferous Cyclic Sedimentation. Journal of the Geological Society, 123, 421-444. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.122.1.0421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wray, D.A., Stephens, J.V., Edwards W.N. and Bromehead, C.E.N. (1930) Geology of the Country around Huddersfield and Halifax. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Sheet 77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Percival, C.J. (1983b) A Definition of the Term Ganister. Geological Magazine, 120, 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800025346</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Steele, R.P. (1988) The Namurian Sedimentary History of the Gainsborough Trough, In: Besly, B.M. and Kelling, G., Eds., Sedimentation in a Synorogenic Basin Complex: The Upper Carboniferous of Northwest Europe, Blackie, Glasgow &amp; London, 102-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jerrett, R.M. and Hampson, G.J. (2007) Sequence Stratigraphy of the Upper Millstone Grit (Yeadonian, Namurian) North Wales. Geological Journal, 42, 513-530. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.1089</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jorden, D. (1993) Core Log of Trent Field Well 43/24-4. Unpublished.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hampson, G.J., Elliott, T. and Flint, S.S. (1996) Critical Application of High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphic Concepts to the Rough Rock Group (Upper Carboniferous) of Northern England. In: Howell, J.F. and Aitken, J.A., Eds., High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy: Innovations and Applications, Geological Society of London Special Publication 104, London, 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.104.01.14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waters, C.N., Aitkenhead, N., Jones, N.S. and Chisholm, J.I. (1996) Late Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Sedimentology of the Bradford Area and Its Implications for the Regional Geology of Northern England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 51, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.51.2.87</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hampson, G.J. (1998) Evidence for Relative Sea-Level Falls during Deposition of the Upper Carboniferous Millstone Grit, South Wales. Geological Journal, 33, 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1034(199810/12)33:4&lt;243::AID-GJ800&gt;3.0.CO;2-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sevastopulo, G.D. (2009) Carboniferous. In: Holland, C.P. and Sanders, I.S., Eds., The Geology of Ireland, Dunedin Academic Press Ltd., Edinburgh, 269-294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Flint, S., Aitken, J. and Hampson, G. (1995) Application of Sequence Stratigraphy to Coal-Bearing Coastal Plain Successions: Implications for the UK Coal Measures. In: Whateley, M.K.G. and Spears, D.A., Eds., European Coal Geology, Geological Society of London Special Publication 82, London, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1995.082.01.01</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monaghan, A.A., Arsenikos, S., Quinn, M.F., Johnson, K.R., Vincent, C.J., Vane, C.H., Kim, A.W., Uguna, C.N., Hannis, S.D., Gent, C.M.A., Millward, D., Kearsey, T.I. and Williamson, J.P. (2017) Carboniferous Petroleum Systems around the Mid North Sea High, UK. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 88, 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.08.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Norman, A.J.V. (2007) The Cavendish Field Development, Block 43/19a, UKCS Southern North Sea. European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers, 69th Conference, London. https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/BLCP%3ACN065517745</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Roscher, M. and Schneider, J.W. (2006) Permo-Carboniferous Climate: Early Pennsylvanian to Late Permian Climate Development of Central Europe in a Regional and Global Context. In: Lucas, S.G., Cassinis, G. and Schneider, J.W., Eds., Non-Marine Permian Biostratigraphy and Biochronology, Geological Society of London Special Publication 265, London, 95-136. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.265.01.05</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fisher, Q.J. and Wignall, P.B. (2001) Paleoenvironmental Controls on Uranium Distribution in an Upper Carboniferous Black Shale (Gastrioceras listeri Marine Band) and Associated Strata; England. Chemical Geology, 175, 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00376-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heckel, P.H. (1977) Origin of Phosphatic Black Shale Facies in Pennsylvanian Cyclothems of Midcontinent North America. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geology, 61, 1045-1068. https://doi.org/10.1306/C1EA4793-16C9-11D7-8645000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wignall, P.B. and Maynard, J.R. (1994) High Resolution Sequence-Stratigraphy in the Early Marsdenian (Namurian, Carboniferous) of the Central Pennines and Adjacent Areas. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 51, 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.51.2.127</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bloxam, T.W. and Thomas, R.L. (1969) Palaeontological and Geochemical Facies in the Gastrioceras Subcrenatum Marine-Band and Associated Rocks from the SouthWales Coalfield. Journal of the Geological Society, 124, 239-281. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.124.1.0239</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bisat</surname><given-names> W.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1941</year>)<article-title>An Early Gastrioceras (G. branneroides sp. nov.) from North Wales</article-title><source> Transactions of the Leeds Geological Association</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 330</fpage>-<lpage>335</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aitkenhead, N. and Riley, N. (1996) Kinderscoutian and Marsdenian Successions in the Bradup and Hag Farm Boreholes, near Ilkley, West Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 51, 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.51.2.115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashton, C.A. (1974) Palaeontology, Stratigraphy and Sedimentology of the Kinderscoutian and Lower Marsdenian (Namurian) of North Staffordshire and Adjacent Areas. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, Keele.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref144"><label>144</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramsbottom, W.H.C. (1969) The Namurian of Britain. 6th International Congress on Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, Vol. 1, 219-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref145"><label>145</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramsbottom, W.H.C. (1977) Major Cycles of Transgression and Regression (Mesothems) in the Namurian. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 41, 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.41.3.261</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref146"><label>146</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramsbottom, W.H.C. (1979) Rates of Transgression and Regression in the Carboniferous of NW Europe. Journal of the Geological Society, 136, 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.136.2.0147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref147"><label>147</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waltham, D. (2015) Milankovitch Period Uncertainties and Their Impact on Cyclostratigraphy. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 85, 990-998. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2015.66</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref148"><label>148</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>B&amp;#246;ger</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1966</year>)<article-title>Die marinen niveaus über den Fl&amp;#246;zen Schieferbank und Sarnsbank (Grenze Namur C-Westfal A) im Ruhrgebeit</article-title><source> Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland Und Westfalen</source><volume> 13</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>38</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref149"><label>149</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michelau</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1967</year>)<article-title>Ein feinstratigraphisches profil durch die Sprockh&amp;#246;veler Schichten (Nam. C) von Blankenstein bis Sprockh&amp;#246;vel</article-title><source> Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland Und Westfalen</source><volume> 13</volume>,<fpage> 1109</fpage>-<lpage>1196</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref150"><label>150</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunham, K.C. and Wilson, A.A. (1985) Geology of the Northern Pennine Orefield, Vol. 2, Stainmore to Craven. Economic Memoir of the British Geological Survey Sheets 40, 41 &amp; 50, Parts 31, 32, 51, 60 &amp; 61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref151"><label>151</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, G.A.L., Somerville, I.D., Tucker, M.E. and Cozar, P. (2011) Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Context of the Seal Sands No. 1 Borehole, Teesmouth, NE England: Deepest Onshore Borehole in Great Britain. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 58, 173-196. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.58.3.231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref152"><label>152</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brandon, A. and Hodson, F. (1984) The Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Late Visean and Early Namurian Rocks of North-East Connaught. Geological Survey of Ireland, Special Paper 6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref153"><label>153</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brandon, A., Riley, N.J., Wilson, A.A. and Ellison R.A. (1995) Three New Early Namurian (E1c-E2a) Marine Bands in Central and Northern England, UK and Their Bearing on Correlations with the Askrigg Block. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 50, 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.50.4.333</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref154"><label>154</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tucker, M.E., Gallagher, J. and Leng, M.J. (2009) Are Beds in Shelf Carbonates Millennial-Scale Cycles? An Example from the Mid-Carboniferous of Northern England. Sedimentary Geology, 214, 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2008.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref155"><label>155</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elliott, T. (1975) The Sedimentary History of a Delta Lobe from a Yoredale (Carboniferous) Cyclothem. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 40, 505-536. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.40.4.505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref156"><label>156</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bowden, A. (2001) The Asbian to Arnsbergian Conodonts and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Northumberland Trough. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Durham, Durham.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref157"><label>157</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aitkenhead, N. (1977) The Institute of Geological Sciences Borehole at Duffield, Derbyshire. Bulletin of the Geological Survey, Great Britain, 59, 1-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref158"><label>158</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mills, D.A.C. and Hull, J.H. (1976) Geology of the Country around Barnard Castle. Memoir Geological Survey GB, Sheet 32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref159"><label>159</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fowler, A. (1936) The Geology of the Country around Rothbury, Amble and Ashington. Memoir of the Geological Survey, GB, Sheets 9 &amp; 10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref160"><label>160</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sims, A.P. (1988) The Evolution of a Sand-Rich Basin-Fill Sequence in the Pendleian (Namurian E1c) of North-West England. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref161"><label>161</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arthurton, R.S., Johnson, E.W. and Mundy, D.J.C. (1988) Geology of the Country around Settle, Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain. Sheet 60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref162"><label>162</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burgess, I. and Holliday, D.W. (1979) Geology of the Country around Brough-Under Stainmore. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Sheet 31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref163"><label>163</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kane, I.A., Catterall, V., McCaffrey, W.D. and Martinsen, O.J. (2010) Submarine Channel Response to Intrabasinal Tectonics: The Influence of Lateral Tilt. American Association of Petroleum Geology Bulletin, 94, 189-219. https://doi.org/10.1306/08180909059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref164"><label>164</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aitkenhead, N., Chisholm, J.I. and Stephenson, I.P. (1985) Geology of the Country around Buxton, Leek and Bakewell. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Sheet 111.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref165"><label>165</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Evans, W.B., Wilson, A.A., Taylor, B.J. and Price, D. (1968) Geology of the Country around Macclesfield, Congleton, Crewe and Middlewich. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Sheet 110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref166"><label>166</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilson, A.A. and Thompson, A.T. (1959) Marine Bands of Arnsbergian Age (Namurian) in the South-Eastern Portion of the Askrigg Block, Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 32, 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.32.1.45</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref167"><label>167</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mills, D.A.C. and Holliday, D.W. (1998) Geology of the Country around Newcasytle upon Tyne, Gateshead and Consett, Memoir, British Geological Survey, Sheet 20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref168"><label>168</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bolton, T. (1978) The Palaeontology, Stratigraphy and Sedimentology of Upper Arnsbergian, Chokierian and Alportian of the North Staffordshire Basin. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Keele, Keele.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref169"><label>169</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilson, A.A. (1960) The Millstone Grit Series of Colsterdale and Neighbourhood, Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 32, 429-452. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.32.4.429</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref170"><label>170</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramsbottom W.H.C. (1978) Namurian Mesothems in South Wales and Northern France. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 135, 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.135.3.0307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref171"><label>171</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Paproth</surname><given-names> E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1971</year>)<article-title>Megafuana. In: Die Karbon-Ablagerungen in der Buntersrepublik Deutschland</article-title><source> Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland Und Westfalen</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 109</fpage>-<lpage>112</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref172"><label>172</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinsen, O.J., Sullivan, M., Pulham, A., Haughton, P., Harper, H. and Elliot, T. (2008) Outcrops Revitalized; Tool, Techniques and Applications Kilkee, County Clare, Ireland June 22-27. 2008 Field Guide SEPM Research Conference. 53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref173"><label>173</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collinson, J.D. (1969) The Sedimentology of the Grindslow Shales and Kinderscout Grit: A Deltaic Complex in the Namurian of Northern England. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 39, 194-221. https://doi.org/10.1306/74D71C17-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref174"><label>174</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">McCabe, P.J. (1978) The Kinderscoutian Delta (Carboniferous) of Northern England: A Slope Influenced by Density Currents. In: Stanley, D. and Kelling, G., Eds., Sedimentation in Submarine Fans and Trenches, Dowden, Hutchinson &amp; Ross, Stroudsburg, 116-126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref175"><label>175</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walker, R.G. (1967) Shale Grit &amp; Grindslow Shales: Transition from Turbidity to Shallow Water Sediments in the Upper Carboniferous of Northern England. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 38, 90-114. https://doi.org/10.1306/74D71415-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref176"><label>176</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fiege, K. and Van Leckwijck, W. (1969) Cyclicité dans le Namurien du synclinal de Namur (Belgique). Service Géologie Belgique, Professional Paper, No. 7. (In French)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref177"><label>177</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johan, Y., Dusar, M., Swennen R., Delcambre, B., Cornet, C., Rippen, D. and Goemaere, E. (2013) Gas Shales in Belgium, Conference Proceedings, Geologica Belgica.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref178"><label>178</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Eagar, R.M.C., Baines, J.G., Collinson, J.D., Hardy, P.G., Okolo, S.A. and Pollard, J.E. (1985) Trace Fossil Assemblages and Their Occurrence in Silesian (Mid-Carboniferous) Deltaic Sediments of the Central Pennine Basin, England. In: Curran, H.S., Ed., Biogenic Structures: Their Use in Interpreting Depositional Environments, Society of Sedimentary Geology, Tulsa, Special Publication, No. 35, 99-145. https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.85.35.0099</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref179"><label>179</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collinson, J.D., Jones, C.M. and Wilson, A.A. (1977) The Marsdenian Succession West of Blackburn, Implications for the Evolution of Pennine Delta Systems. Liverpool and Manchester Geological Journal, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3350120105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref180"><label>180</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waters, C.N., Chisholm, J.I., Hough, E. and Evans, D.J. (2012) Geology of the Glossop District—A Brief Explanation of the Geological Map. Sheet Explanation of the British Geological Survey. 1:50 000 Sheet 86 Glossop.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref181"><label>181</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reading, H.G. (1969) Sedimentation Sequences in the Upper Carboniferous of North-Western Europe. 6th International Congress on Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, Sheffield, Vol. 4, 1406-1411.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref182"><label>182</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riley N.J. (1997) Faunal Biostratigraphy of Cores 1-13 Amoco 43/19a-4z. BGS Report WH 97/1C. Unpublished.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref183"><label>183</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B&amp;#246;ger, H. (1964) Paloekologische Untersuchungen an Cyclothemen im Ruhrkarbon. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 38, 142-157. (In German) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988844</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref184"><label>184</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eagar, R.M.C. (1963) The Succession and Correlation of the Coal Measures of South Eastern Ireland. Compte Rendu de le 4me Congress pour I’Advancement des Etudes de Stratigraphie et de Geologie du Carbonifere, Paris, Vol. 1, 359-374.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref185"><label>185</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilson, A.A. and Chisholm, J.I. (2004) Reference Sections of Faunal Bands in the Lower Coal Measures Formation at Elland, West Yorkshire, UK. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 55, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.55.1.21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref186"><label>186</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barclay, W.J. (1989) The Geology of the South Wales Coalfield, Part II, the Country around Abergavenny, Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Sheet 232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref187"><label>187</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Langenaeker, V. and Dusar, M. (1992) Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Namurian and Earliest Westphalian in the Western Part of the Campine Basin (N. Belgium). Geologie En Mijnbouw, 71, 161-172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref188"><label>188</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woodland, A.W. and Evans, W.B. (1964) The Geology of the South Wales Coalfield, Part IV, the Country around Pontypridd and Maesteg, Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Sheet 248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref189"><label>189</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neville, W.E. (1956) The Millstone Grit and Lower Coal Measures of the Leinster Coalfield. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (B), 68, 1-16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20490914</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref190"><label>190</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neville, W.E. (1961) The Westphalian of Ireland. Compte Rendu de le 4me Congress pour I’Advancement des Etudes de Stratigraphie et de Geologie du Carbonifere, Heerlen, Vol. 2, 453-461.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref191"><label>191</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burgess, P.M., Lammers, H., van Oosterhout, C. and Granjeon, D. (2006) Multivariate Sequence Stratigraphy: Tackling Complexity and Uncertainty with Stratigraphic forward Modeling, Multiple Scenarios and Conditional Frequency Maps. Bulletin of the Anerican Society of Petroleum Geologists, 90, 1883-1901. https://doi.org/10.1306/06260605081</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref192"><label>192</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burgess, P.M. and Prince, G.B. (2015) Non-Unique Stratal Geometries: Implications for Sequence Stratigraphic Interpretations. Basin Research, 27, 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12082</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref193"><label>193</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bijkerk, J.F., ten Veen, J., Postma, G., Mikes, D., van Strien, W. and de Vries, J. (2014) The Role of Climate Variation in Delta Architecture: Lessons from Analogue Modeling. Basin Research, 26, 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref194"><label>194</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bruce, D. and Stemmerik, L. (2003) Carboniferous. In: Evans, D., Graham, C., Armour, A. and Bathurst, P., Eds., The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea, Geological Society of London, London, 7-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref195"><label>195</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cecil, C.B., Dulong, F.T., West, R.R., Stamm, R., Wardlaw, B. and Edgar, N.T. (2003) Climate Controls on the Stratigraphy of a Middle Pennsylvanian Cyclothem in North America. In: Cecil, C.B. and Edgar, N.T., Eds., Climate Controls on Stratigraphy, Society of Sedimentary Geology, Tulsa, Special Publication No. 77, 151-182. https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.03.77.0151</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref196"><label>196</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Falcon-Lang, H.J. (2004) Pennsylvanian Tropical Rain Forests Responded to Glacial-Interglacial Rhythms. Geology, 32, 689-692. https://doi.org/10.1130/G20523.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref197"><label>197</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soregham, G.S., Sweet, D.E. and Heavens, N.G. (2014) Upland Glaciation in Tropical Pangea: Geologic Evidence and Implications for Late Paleozoic Climate Modeling. Journsl of Geology, 122, 137-263. https://doi.org/10.1086/675255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref198"><label>198</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heavens, N.G., Mahowald, N.M., Soreghan, G.S., Soreghan, M.J. and Shields, C.A. (2015) A Model-Based Evaluation of Tropical Climate in Pangaea during the Late Palaeozoic Icehouse. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 425, 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.02.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref199"><label>199</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kutzbach, J.E. and Gallimore, R.G. (1989) Pangaean Climates: Megamonsoons of the Megacontinent. Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmosphere, 94, 3341-3357. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD03p03341</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref200"><label>200</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horton, D.E., Poulsen, C.J., Monta&amp;#241;ez, I.P. and DiMichele, W.A. (2012) Eccentricity-Paced Late Paleozoic Climate Change. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 331, 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.03.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref201"><label>201</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peyser, C.E. and Poulsen, C.J. (2008) Controls on Permo-Carboniferous Precipitation over Tropical Pangaea: A GCM Sensitivity Study. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeocogy, 268, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.03.048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref202"><label>202</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prell, W.L. and Kutchbach, J.E. (1987) Monsooon Variability over the Last 150,000 Years. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 8411-8425. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD07p08411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref203"><label>203</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prell, W.L. and Kutchbach, J.E. (1992) Sensitivity of the Indian Monsoon to Forcing Parameters and Implications for Its Evolution. Nature, 360, 647-652. https://doi.org/10.1038/360647a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref204"><label>204</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, X., Chen, F., Zhou, A., Huang, X.H., Tang, L., Wu, D., Zhang, X. and Yu, J. (2014) Vegetation History, Climatic Changes and Indian Summer Monsoon Evolution during the Last Glaciation (36,400-13,400 cal. Yr. BP) Documented by Sediments from Xingyun Lake, Yunnan, China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 410, 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.05.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref205"><label>205</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saraswat, R., Nigam, R. and Correge, T. (2013) A Glimpse of the Quaternary Monsoon History from India and Adjoining Seas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 397, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref206"><label>206</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shanahan, T.M., McKay, N.P., Hughen, K.A., Overpeck, J.T., Otto-Bliesner, B., Heil, C.W., King, J., Scholz, C.A. and Peck, J. (2015) The Time-Transgressive Termination of the African Humid Period. Nature Geoscience, 2, 140-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2329</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref207"><label>207</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Skonieczny, C., Paillou, P., Bory, A., Bayon, G., Biscara, L., Crosta, X., Eynaud, F., Malaize, B., Revel, M., Aleman, N., Barusseau, J.P., Vernet, R., Lopez, S. and Grousset, F. (2015) African Humid Periods Triggered the Reactivation of a Large River System in Western Sahara. Nature Communications, 6, Article No. 8751. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9751</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref208"><label>208</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Percival, C.J. (1983) The Firestone Sill Ganister, Namurian, Northern England—The A2 Horizon of a Podzol or Podzolic Palaeosol. Sedimentary Geology, 36, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(83)90020-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref209"><label>209</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stephenson, M.H., Angiolini, L., Cózar, P., Jadoul, F., Leng, M.J., Millward, D. and Chenery, S. (2010) Northern England, Serpukhovian (Early Namurian) Far Field Responses to Southern Hemisphere Glaciation. Journal of the Geological Society, 167, 1171-1184. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref210"><label>210</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Creaney, S. (1980) Petrographic Texture and Vitrinite Reflection Variation on the Alston Block, North-East England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 42, 553-580. https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.42.4.553</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref211"><label>211</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lemon, L. (2006) The Climatic, Eustatic and Tectonic Controls on the Mid Carboniferous (Visean and Namurian) Strata of Northumbria, England. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Durham, Durham.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref212"><label>212</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ross, C.A. and Ross, J.R.P. (1985) Late Paleozoic Depositional Sequences Are Synchronous and Worldwide. Geology, 13, 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1985)13&lt;194:LPDSAS&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref213"><label>213</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ross, C.A. and Ross, J.R.P. (1987) Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences. Cushman Found. Foraminifer. Research Special Publication 24, 137-149. https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/61</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref214"><label>214</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ross, C.A. and Ross, J.R.P. (1988) Late Paleozoic Transgressive-Regressive Deposition. In: Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S, Kendall, C.G.S.C., Posamentier, H.W., Ross, C.A. and Van Wagoner, J.C., Eds., Sea-Level Changes: An Integrated Approach, Society of Sedimentary Geology, Tulsa, Special Publication 42, 227-247. https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.88.01.0227</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref215"><label>215</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saunders, W.B. and Ramsbottom, W.H.C. (1986) The Mid-Carboniferous Eustatic Event. Geology, 14, 208-212. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14&lt;208:TMEE&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref216"><label>216</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Isbell, J.L., Cole, D.I. and Catuneanu, O. (2008) Carboniferous-Permian Glaciation in the Main Karoo Basin, South Africa: Stratigraphy, Depositional Controls, and Glacial Dynamics. In: Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 441, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(05)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref217"><label>217</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Rocha-Campos, A.C., dos Santos, P.R. and Canuto, J.R. (2008) Late Paleozoic Glacial Deposits of Brazil: Parana Basin. In: Fielding, C.R., Frank T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 441, 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(07)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref218"><label>218</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isbell, J.L., Miller, M.F., Wolfe, K.L. and Lenaker, P.A. (2012) Glacial Paradoxes during the Late Paleozoic Ice Age: Evaluating the Equilibrium Line Altitude as a Control on Glaciation. Gondwana Research, 22, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.11.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref219"><label>219</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Caputo, M.C., Gon&amp;#263;alves de Melo, J.H., Streel, M. and Isbell, J.L. (2008) Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous glacial Records of South America, In: Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 441, 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(11)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref220"><label>220</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gulbranson, E.L., Monta&amp;#241;ez, I.P., Schmitz, M.D., Limarino, C.O., Isbell, J.L., Marenssi, S.A. and Crowley, J.L. (2010). High-Presicion U-Pb Calibration of Carboniferous Glaciation and Climate History, Paganzo Group, NW Argentina. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 122, 1480-1498. https://doi.org/10.1130/B30025.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref221"><label>221</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Henry, L.C., Isbell, J.L. and Limarino, C.O. (2008) Carboniferous Glacigenic Deposits of the Proto-Precordilleara of West-Central Argentina. In: Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 441, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(09)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref222"><label>222</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dineen, A.A., Fraiser, M.L. and Isbell, J.L. (2013) Palaeoecology and Sedimentology of Carboniferous Glacial and Post-Glacial Successions in the Paganzo and Rio Blanco Basins of Northwestern Argentina. In: Gasiewicz, A. and S&amp;#320;owakiewicz, M., Eds., Palaeozoic Climate Cycles: Their Evolutionary and Sedimentological Impact, Geological Society of London, London, Special Publication 376, 109-140. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP376.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref223"><label>223</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Limarino, C.O. and Spalletti, L.A. (2006a) Paleogeography of the Upper Paleozoic Basins of Southern South America: An Overview. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 22, 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2006.09.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref224"><label>224</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Limarino, C.O., Tripaldi, A., Marenssi, S. and Fauque, L. (2006b) Tectonic, Sea-Level, and Climatic Controls on Late Paleozoic Sedimentation in the Western Basins of Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 22, 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2006.09.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref225"><label>225</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Mory, A.J., Redfern, J. and Martin, J.R. (2008) A Review of Permian-Carboniferous Glacial Deposits in Western Australia. In: Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 441, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(02)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref226"><label>226</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garzanti, E. and Sciunnach, D. (1997) Early Carboniferous Onset of Gondwanian Glaciation and Neo-Tethyan Rifting in South Tibet. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 148, 359-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00028-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref227"><label>227</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monta&amp;#241;ez, I.P. and Poulsen, C.J. (2013) The Late Paleozoic Ice Age: An Evolving Paradigm. Annual Review Earth Planetary Science, 41, 629-656. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref228"><label>228</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lawver, L.A., Dalziel, I.W.D., Norton, I.O. and Gahagan, L.M. (2007) The Plates 2007 Atlas of Plate Reconstructions (750 Ma to Present Day). Plates Progress Report No. 305-0307, Technical Report 195 (160), University of Texas, Austin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref229"><label>229</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, A.G. (1999.) Gondwana: Its Shape, Size and Position from Cambrian to Triassic Times. Journal of African Earth Science, 28, 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(99)00020-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref230"><label>230</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Powell, C.M. and Li, S.S. (1994) Reconstruction of the Panthalassan Margin of Gondwanaland. In: Veevers, J.J. and Powell, C.M., Eds., Permian-Triassic Pangean Basins and Foldbelts along the Panthalassan Margin of Gondwanaland, Geological Society of America, Boulder, No. 84, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM184-p5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref231"><label>231</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Davies, S.J. (2008) The Record of Carboniferous Sea-Level Change in Low-Latitude Sedimentary Successions from Britain and Ireland during the Onset of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age. In: Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D. and Isbell, J.L., Eds., Resolving the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Time and Space, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Special Paper 441, 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.2441(13)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref232"><label>232</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menning, M., Weyer, D., Drozdzewski, G. and Van Emerom, H.W.J. (2000) A Carboniferous Time Scale 2000; Discussion and Use of Geological Parameters as Time Indicators from Central and Western Europe. Geologisches Jarbuch (A), 156, 3-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref233"><label>233</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Davydov, V.I. Wardlaw, B.R. and Gradstein, F.M. (2004) The Carboniferous Period. In: Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G. and Smith, A.G., Eds., The Geologic Time Scale 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 222-248. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511536045.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119587-ref234"><label>234</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davydov, V., Crowley, J.L., Schmitz, M.D. and Poletaev, V.I. (2010) High-Precision U-Pb Zircon Age Calibration of the Global Carboniferous Time Scale and Milankovitch Band Cyclicity in the Donets Basin, Eastern Ukraine. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 11, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002736</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>