<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJPathology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Pathology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-6775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojpathology.2022.124014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJPathology-119392</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Ocular Surgical Pathologies in Children Aged 0 to 15 Years in the Bartim&#233;e Ophthalmological Clinic in Conakry, Guinea
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maxime</surname><given-names>Dantouma Sovogui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christophe</surname><given-names>Zoumanigui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M’mah</surname><given-names>Aminata Bangoura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mössö</surname><given-names>Sevogui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kokou</surname><given-names>Vonor</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Bartimée Ophthalmological Clinic, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Pediatrics Department of the Donka National Hospital, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Health Sciences and Techniques, University of Conakry, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>KARA Regional Hospital Center in Togo, Kara, Togo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>120</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Context: Childhood eye health is a real public health problem in our context, the consequences of which go beyond vision, affecting education, social participation and future economic productivity. The aim was to study the frequency of ocular surgical pathologies in children aged 0 to 15 years. 
  Patients and Methodius: This study covered a 4 years period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020. It was a retrospective study of a descriptive and analytical nature. It concerned all children aged 0 to 15 who had undergone surgery for ocular pathology during the study period and who were included in the operating room register. 
  Results: Out of 4974 patients of all ages operated for ocular surgical pathology, 124 were children aged 0 to 15 years or 2.49%. The 9 - 12 age group was the most represented with 29.03%; the mean age was 7.3 years &#177; 4.6 with extremes of 3 months and 15 years. A male predominance was observed at 62.90%. Pathologies of the lens, cataract and eyelids, traumatic edema represented the most frequent eye conditions in our patients with respectively 51 cases or 41.13% in the right eye (OD), 54 cases or 53.55% in the left eye (OG) and 14 cases or 11.29% in OD and OG followed by endemic limboconjunctivitis of the tropics (LCET), 10 cases or 3.23%, in OD and hemorrhage under conjunctival 13 cases or 10.48% in OG. Cataract surgery with the Technique Manuel Small Incision Cataract Surgery + Implantation in the posterior chamber (MSICS + ICP) was the most used in 74% of cases. General anesthesia was the most widely used anesthetic method in 100% of cases. The clinical course was favorable at 45.97%. 
  Conclusion: We note a relatively low hospital frequency of ocular surgical pathologies in children, with a male predominance. The early consultation period and the improvement of the technical platform could improve their management.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Surgeries</kwd><kwd> Conakry</kwd><kwd> Children</kwd><kwd> Guinea</kwd><kwd> Eyepieces</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Eye health in children is a real public health problem in developing countries, the consequences of which go far beyond vision, affecting education, social participation and economic productivity future [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref1">1</xref>]. Worldwide, more than 90 million children suffer from ocular pathologies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref2">2</xref>], of which 1.4 million and 22 million have moderate to severe visual impairment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref3">3</xref>]. Surgical ophthalmology includes all surgical procedures aimed at repairing ocular tissues and/or improving visual function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref4">4</xref>]. In children, the prognosis depends on the precocity of the diagnosis at the risk of lasting or even definitive consequences. The procedure can be performed on an outpatient basis under general anesthesia for comfort [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref5">5</xref>]. Several studies carried out around the world in children aged 0 to 15 show that at the top of the list of surgical eye conditions appear traumatic cataracts: At the Brazzaville University Hospital in Congo in 2011, the main causes of blindness were traumatic cataracts, i.e., 36.47% and post-traumatic corneal opacities 25.88% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref6">6</xref>]. In Burkina Faso at the CHU Yalgado Ou&#233;draogo, the prevalence of blindness was 4.36%, with a sex ratio of 1.70. The most incriminated cause was traumatic cataract, i.e., 30.65% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref7">7</xref>]. In Mali Bamako in the CHU IOTA, traumatic cataract surgery represented 1.4% of all operated cataracts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref8">8</xref>]. The aim of this work was to study the frequency of ocular surgical pathologies in children aged 0 to 15 years in the Bartim&#233;e Ophthalmological Clinic in Conakry, Guinea.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This was a retrospective, descriptive and analytical study. This study covered a period of 4 years from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 at the Bartim&#233;e eye clinic in Conakry, Guinea. It covered the records of all children aged 0 to 15 operated on and followed up postoperatively during the study period. Were excluded from this study, all children whose records were incomplete and those who followed postoperatively whose procedure was not performed at the Bartim&#233;e clinic. The variables studied were epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic and evolutionary. Data collection was done from a questionnaire on an individual survey sheet. We used as data sources the hospitalization register and the medical files of the patients. Data were processed and analyzed using Epi-info version 7.4.0 software. Zotero software version 5.0.96.2 was used for the bibliographic references. A person’s chi-square test was used to compare proportions. The α significance level used was 0.05 and p had to be less than α for there to be a statistically significant relationship between the variables studied.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>During our study period, 4974 patients of all ages were operated on for ocular surgical pathology, among whom we collected 124 children aged 0 to 15, i.e., a frequency of 2.49%.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Preoperative Results</title><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the mean age was 7.3 years &#177; 4.6 with extremes of 3 months and 15 years. The age group from 0 to 5 years old was the most represented with a male predominance. More than half of the patients were educated and came from the special zone of Conakry.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> summarizes the clinical variables and shows that: the most frequent reason for consultation was the decline in visual acuity. The consultation time was greater than 72 hours in more than half of the cases. Ametropia was the most frequent antecedent. Prior medical treatment was the most represented.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, visual acuity (VA) without a correction between PL (Perception of light) and 1/10 was the most represented. Corrected visual acuity (CVA) was not achieved in more than 2/3 of the patients.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the images performed were mode B ultrasound for more than half of the cases, biometry and computed tomography in small proportions.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Post Operative Results</title><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the type of anesthesia used in the theater was general</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age en years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masculin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F&#233;minin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Schooling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Schooled</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preschool age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unschooled</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Origin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conakry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interior of the country</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.97</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Mean age: 7.3 years &#177; 4.6; Extremes: 3 months and 15 years; sex ratio: 1.70.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reason for consultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decline in visual acuity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eye trauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leukocoria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >tearing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pruritus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >eye pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eye redness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Headaches</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tingling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Photophobia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ptosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consultation period</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;24 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 - 48 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;72 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unspecified</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Background</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diabetes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >sickle cell disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ophthalmological</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ametropia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eye trauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limbo Conjunctivitis Endemic to the Tropics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hyalite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudophakia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without previous treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.49</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distance visual acuity without and with preoperative correction</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Acuity without correction</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Right eye</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Left eye</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Can’t see the light</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[See the light—1/10]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[1-2/10]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥3/10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Visual acuity with correction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1/10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥3/10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not improved</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not done</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Pathologies and surgical indications</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pathologies</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Indication for surgery</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cataract</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small incision cataract surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trabeculectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >eye wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eye wound repair</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limboconjunctivitis Endemic to the Tropics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Periectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molluscum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Excision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary cataract</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Capsulotomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dacryocystitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Evacuation and lacrimal sounding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foreign bodies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foreign body removal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cysts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kystectomie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pupillary seclusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphinterectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D&#233;collement de r&#233;tine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strapping by indentation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>anesthesia in 100% of cases by intravenous induction with ketamine and Diprivan 10 mg. The left eye was operated on more, conservative surgery was the most performed, including cataract surgery with small incision, which was the most performed.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, functionally, distance visual acuity without correction measured at D25 showed visual acuity greater than or equal to 3/10th in nearly half of the cases. The evolution was also favorable in nearly half of the cases.</p><p>Compared to the evolution according to sex, we found a significant link with male sex since the calculated χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.69 &gt; theoretical χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.84; ddl = 1 i.e. p &lt; α. Concerning the evolution according to age, a significant link was also found with calculated χ<sup>2</sup> = 16.45 &gt; theoreticalχ<sup>2</sup> = 3.84; ddl = 1 i.e. p &lt; α. We did not find any significant link between evolution and origin: calculated χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.024 &lt; theoretical χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.84; dof = 1; p &gt; α. (See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to evolution at D25 postoperative</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Evolution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Favorable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing without anatomical and functional sequelae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing with anatomical sequelae and Visual Acuity ≥3/10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Unfavorable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anatomical sequelae and Visual Acuity &lt;3/10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No light perception</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anatomical and functional loss</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Evolution according to socio-demographic variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Favorable development</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unfavorable development</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preschool</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >School</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sexe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0375</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feminine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Origin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conakry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interior of the country</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussions</title><p>In this study, the hospital frequency of ocular surgical pathologies is 2.49 with a mean age of 7.3 years &#177; 4.6; extremes of 3 months and 15 years and a sex ratio of 1.70. Conservative surgery was the most practiced, including cataract surgery with a small incision in more than half of the cases. The evolution was favorable with visual acuity without correction on D25 postoperative ≥ 3/10. There were statistically significant links between evolution age and sex, but there was no significant link with provenance. This result in relation to frequency is lower than that of Assav&#232;do CRA et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref9">9</xref>] who found a frequency of 14%. This relatively low rate could be explained by the fact that ocular surgical pathologies are strongly linked to age. With respect to age (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), our result is similar to that of Soumahoro M et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref10">10</xref>] in the Ivory Coast who found an average age of 7.8 years. Our results could be explained by the fact that this age is marked by the discovery of its environment and its exploitation, hence the occurrence of play accidents, domestic accidents or sometimes accidents occurring in the playground. In relation to gender (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), this male predominance is also observed in the study by Mayouego Kouamsur J et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref11">11</xref>] in Ile-de-France in an ophthalmological emergency department which found a sex ratio of 1.6. G Koki [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref12">12</xref>] in northern Cameroon finds 55% of the male gender in his study on limbo conjunctivitis endemic to the tropics. This predominance could be explained by the turbulence of the masculine gender, by the practice of sometimes dangerous games. However, it could be verified in the context of trauma. With regard to origin and schooling (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), our results could be explained by choice of the study site, which is the urban area of Conakry, where most children are in school. Decreased visual acuity was the most frequent reason followed by ocular trauma (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). This data agrees with that of Mayouego Kouamsur J et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref11">11</xref>] who found that close to the pathologies were ocular traumas. This could be explained by the occurrence of gaming and domestic accidents. The consultation time greater than 72 hours was the most observed, with an average consultation time of 1.2 days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Salek H et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref13">13</xref>] found that 45.54% of children had surgery within 48 to 72 hours of admission; the average treatment time was 4.5 days with extremes ranging from one day to four weeks. This delay of more than 72 hours of consultation observed in our study could be explained by weak economic power, ignorance, negligence, self-medication and consultations with traditional healers. The high frequency of ophthalmological history such as ametropia and ocular trauma (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) could be due to the high proportion of males in our study. Preoperative visual acuity without correction, between PL and 1/10 was poor according to WHO criteria: AV less than 1/10 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The results in relation to visual acuity without correction and with correction are explained by the fact that many ocular pathologies are responsible for a decrease in visual acuity, which can lead to a functional ocular handicap. The realization of imaging in our study could be explained by the need for preoperative assessment and apprehension of the visual prognosis before the surgical procedure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Regarding the types of pathologies encountered (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), our results are different from those of Amedome KM et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref14">14</xref>]; which could be explained by the frequency of ocular traumas occurring linked to the high proportion of the male gender. The type of anesthesia used in the block was general anesthesia in 100% of cases due to the age of our study population. The left eye was the most operated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), we have not found a scientific explanation for this predominance. Conservative surgical treatment was mainly represented by the MSICS+ICP technique (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), which is different from that of France where phacoemulsification is in the first position with a frequency of more than 700,000 operations per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref15">15</xref>]. This could be explained by the technical platform, phacoemulsification not being within our reach. According to WHO recommendations and guidelines, functional results are classified as good when postoperative visual acuity without correction is greater than or equal to 3/10 in at least 80% of cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref16">16</xref>]. Our visual results without correction are different from those of the WHO guidelines because at D25, without correction, we noted that almost half had visual acuity ≥ 3/10 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). This result corroborates that of Salek H et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref13">13</xref>] who reported that the final best corrected visual acuity was less than 1/10 in 19.25%. This rate of unfavorable evolution is explained by the delay in the management of patients due to their passage to non-specialized centers, the self-medication is undertaken before admission to the clinic and by the acts of traditional healers. The statistically significant link found between evolutions and gender (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>), could be explained by the severity of ocular lesions induced by trauma in males, which is most often severe. In relation to age, at birth the eye will continue to mature until the age of 7 years and it is during this period that it is necessary to correct any refractive anomalies for visual development them as harmonious as possible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119392-ref3">3</xref>]. This is confirmed in our study because there is a statistically significant link between the evolution and preschool age (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). This could be explained by the high proportion of history of ametropia. On the other hand, with regard to the evolution according to the origin, we did not find a significant link.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>At the end of our study, we find a relatively low hospital frequency of ocular surgical pathologies in children, with a male predominance but it deserves special attention because of the potential risk of blindness. The MSICS+ICP technique was the most used with a favorable evolution. However, the early consultation time, the improvement of the technical platform of the Bartim&#233;e ophthalmological clinic, the acquisition of Phacoemulsifiers is prospects which, however, could improve these results.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sovogui, M.D., Zoumanigui, C., Bangoura, M.A., Sevogui, M. and Vonor, K. (2022) Ocular Surgical Pathologies in Children Aged 0 to 15 Years in the Bartim&#233;e Ophthalmological Clinic in Conakry, Guinea. Open Journal of Pathology, 12, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpathology.2022.124014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119392-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNICEF (2014) Convention on the Rights of the Child: For Every Child, Every Right. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bourne, R., Steinmetz, J.D., Flaxman, S., Briant, P.S., Taylor, H.R., Resnikoff, S., et al. (2021) Trends in Prevalence of Blindness and Distance and Near Vision Impairment over 30 Years: An Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health, 9, e130-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness (2022) Child Eye Health. Vision Atlashttps://www.iapb.org/fr/learn/vision-atlas/magnitude-and-projections/child-eye-health/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Regional University Hospital Center of Brest (2021) Eye Surgery at the Brest University Hospital Surgery Department. https://www.chu-brest.fr/fr/notre-offre-soins/nos-specialites/chirurgie/chirurgie-yeux</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hospitals University Geneva (2022). http://www.hug.ch/enfants-ados/chirurgie-pediatrique/chirurgie-ophtalmologique-pediatrique</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tsiba</surname><given-names> W.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Blindness in Children in Brazzaville: Causes and Associated Diseases</article-title><source> Health Sciences and Disease</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>4</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahnoux-Zabsonre, A., Meda, R., Diallo, J., Djiguimde, W.P., Sanou, J., Meda-Hien, G., et al. (2020) Causes of Blindness and Visual Impairment in Children in Ouagadougou: About 398 Cases. Journal Fran&amp;#231;ais d’Ophtalmologie, 43, 907-912.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2020.01.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembélé, A., Sidibé, M., Napo, A., Bakayoko, S., Sylla, F. and Koita, K.B. (2015) Functional Results of Post Traumatic Cataract Surgery in Children at CHU IOTA Bamako (Mali). West African Society of Ophthalmology, 1, 7-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Assavèdo, C.R.A., Tchabi, S., Boni, S., Lassissi, A.H. and Doutetien, C. (2011) Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Eye Diseases in Children in CHD-Borgou, Benin (About 1109 Cases). SOAO Review, 1, 21-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soumahoro, M., Kouassi, F., Sowagnon, T., Koman, E., Diomande, A., Kra, A., et al. (2014) Epidemiology and Management of Perforating Trauma to the Globe in Children about 101 Cases Collected at the University Hospital of Cocody (Abidjan). SOAO, 1, 25-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayouego Kouam, J., Epée, E., Azria, S., Enyama, D., Omgbwa Eballe, A., Ebana Mvogo, C., et al. (2015) Clinical and Therapeutic Epidemiological Aspects of Ocular Trauma in Children in an Ophthalmological Emergency Department in &amp;#206;le-de-France. Journal Fran&amp;#231;ais d’Ophtalmologie, 38, 743-751.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2015.04.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koki, G., Omgbwa Eballe, A., Epee, E., Njuenwet Njapdunke, S.B., Souleymanou Wadjiri, Y., Bella Assumpta, L. and Ebana Mvogo, C. (2011) La limboconjonctivite endémique des tropiques au nord Cameroun. French Journal of Ophthalmology, 34, 113-117. https://www.em-consulte.com/article/281337/la-limboconjunctivite-endemique-des-tropics-au-nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2010.09.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salek, H. (2015) Ocular Trauma in Children, Epidemiological and Clinical Study about 317 Cases. University of Rabbat, Rabbat.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amedome, K.M., Ayena, K.D., Amza, A., Vonor, K., Dzidzinyo, K., Mariama, B., et al. (2016) Profile of Eye Diseases in Children in the Sahelian Zone: Case of the National Hospital of Lamorde in Niamey in Niger. Journal of Scientific Research of the University of Lomé, 18, 209-215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Zaluski, S. (2012) Implantation Multifocale. In: Cochener, B. Ed., Presbyopia, Report of the French Society of Ophthalmology (FSO), Elsevier, Masson. https://www.em-consulte.com/em/SFO/rapport/file_100018.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119392-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pouliquen</surname><given-names> Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Complications of Cataract Surgery</article-title><source> Community Eye Health Journal</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>3</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>