<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2022.108014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-119337</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Phytochemical Screening and Toxicity Assessment of &lt;&gt;Imperata cylindrica&lt;/i&gt; (L.) P. Beauv. (Poaceae) Raw Extracts with Brine Shrimp (&lt;i&gt;Artemia salina&lt;/i&gt;) Lethality Assay
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anne</surname><given-names>Marie Léticia Konan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koffi</surname><given-names>Julien Golly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adou</surname><given-names>Koffi Mathieu Kra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amissa</surname><given-names>Augustin Adima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Essis</surname><given-names>Esmel Claude Lohoues</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of the Biology of Immunity Center, Pasteur Institute, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Biochemistry Department, Medical Sciences Faculty, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Pharmacodynamics Biochemical Laboratory, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Research Department, Water Chemicals and Natural Substances, INP-HB, Yamoussoukro, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>171</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Herbal medicinal preparations are used as dietary supplements for disease prevention and as alternative/complementary medicine. The growing interest in herbal medicine raises the question of its safety and efficacy. Numerous recorded cases of intoxication and toxicological studies reveal that medicinal plants can be toxic, which hinders their safe use. Plant intoxications related to a variety of factors include plant organs and many extraction solvents. Little toxicological data on medicinal plants is available. The need to investigate is important for safe use. 
  <em>Imperata cylindrica</em>, a poaceae, is one of the medicinal plants for which few toxicological data are available. 
  Materials &amp; Methods: To expand toxicological data, water, 70% ethanol, and 30% acetone extracts of the leaves and roots, obtained by maceration and reflux methods, were used for phytochemicals molecules qualitative detection and toxicity test by the brine shrimp lethality assay. 
  Results: The qualitative analysis of the different extracts revealed the presence of alkaloids, polyphenolic compounds, saponins, and polyterpenoids. The toxicity endpoint was lethal concentration 50 (LC
  <sub>50</sub>). The leaves’ extracts LC
  <sub>50</sub> was between 489.78 μg/mL and 1066.6 μg/mL. As for the root extracts, the LC
  <sub>50</sub> was between 341.98 μg/mL and 1530 μg/mL. 
  Discussion: The different compounds’ presence justifies the use of 
  <em>Imperata cylindrica</em> as a medicinal plant. According to Clarkson classification the root extracts are moderately toxic (LC
  <sub>50</sub>: 168.47 μg/mL), and leaf extracts are weakly toxic (LC
  <sub>50</sub>: 527.25 μg/mL). The extrapolation made in relation to the Gosselin, Smith, and Hodge scale, allows us to characterize the 
  <em>Imperata cylindrica</em> root and leaf extracts as non-toxic to humans by oral route. 
  Conclusion: This result can be a base for more precise toxicological studies.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Imperata cylindrica&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Poaceae</kwd><kwd> Phytochemical Analyses</kwd><kwd> Cytotoxicity</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Artemia salina&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Herbal medicinal preparations, grouped under the term natural medicines, have been part of the medicinal repertoire of many people since ancient times. They are used as dietary supplements for disease prevention and as alternative/complementary medicine. The growing interest in herbal medicine raises the question of its safety and efficacy.</p><p>The phytochemicals present in plants produce a physiological action on the human body that results in health benefits. Investigate the efficacity of medicinal plants includes the investigation of the suitable extraction method and corresponding extraction parameters which is very important in the plant-based drug discovery process. Extraction technique, solvent, and plant part are some parameters to explore. It is important to keep in mind that the choice of these parameters should be made according to some criteria as Convenient, inexpensive, efficient, and highly applicable extraction technology on a small-middle scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The safety of herbal medicine is a growing concern because the “natural” character of these drugs somewhat biases the appreciation of their toxicity by the populations. Their safety, judged by the population, is put in motion by the numerous recorded cases of intoxications related to their use. In Malaysia for example, in 2013, 11,473 cases of drug intoxication were recorded of which 0.2% were caused by herbal remedies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref3">3</xref>]. The seeds/nuts of Ginkgo biloba, one of the oldest tree species in the world alive today, are consumed by Asians as common food and used in Asian medicine for coughs, asthma, bedwetting, pyogenic skin infections, and intestinal tract worm infections. Its leaves are also used to treat memory loss and cognitive impairment, arrhythmias and ischemic heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and thrombosis. Investigations and documented cases of intoxication show that ginkgo can cause mild, transient, and reversible adverse effects (convulsions, vomiting, and loss of consciousness, gastrointestinal symptoms, headaches, nausea, vomiting) but also potentially serious effects (spontaneous bleeding) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref4">4</xref>]. Potential side effects are also to be noted with another widely used plant: Ginseng. It is one of the most widely used herbs in traditional Chinese medicine. It is used to maintain, restore or increase health, vitality, and longevity. Panax ginseng has several relatively serious side effects ranging from insomnia, diarrhea, vaginal bleeding, and mastalgia to severe headaches, schizophrenia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref6">6</xref>]. Poisonings related to herbal preparations are the result of active components, extraction solvents, metallic contaminants, confusion between two species, interaction with so-called modern drugs and abuse, the origin of the plant, the part of the plant, the type of extract, and the many extraction solvents used today. The species of ginseng for example are often a source of confusion. The lack of clear distinction between Siberian or Russian ginseng (Eleutherococcus senticosus) and Asian (Chinese or Korean) ginseng (Panax ginseng) generates confusion, as the former does not contain ginsenosides but rather eleutherosides, members of the digitoxin family [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref7">7</xref>]. Still, with the example of ginseng, the daily doses of ginseng vary according to the type. The intake of Panax ginseng extract (G115) is 100 to 400 mg, while the intake of ginseng extract with 20% ethanol is 1 to 2 g. The dosage of Korean red ginseng powder is 0.9 to 6 g, and the intake of Korean red ginseng extract is between 200 mg and a maximum of 60 g per day. The intake of fermented red ginseng powder is 1.5 to 2.7 g and the intake of cultured ginseng extract is 2 g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref5">5</xref>]. The toxicological behavior of some plants can also be paradoxical: for example, the consumption of extracts of senna (Cassia angustifolia) and neem (Azadidirachta indica), two plants commonly used as laxatives and antimalarials, respectively, or green tea (Camellia sinensis), whose consumption is touted for its many virtues, have been shown to be toxic to the liver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref10">10</xref>]. Licorice root used safely to treat duodenal and gastric ulcers can cause serious side effects such as hypokalemia, high blood pressure, heart failure, and death if overused [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref11">11</xref>]. One factor sustaining the safety issue of herbal medicine is the herbal component. Due to the multitude of active components in herbal medicine, the therapeutic dose in herbal medicine can be close to toxic levels. An example is nux vomica which contains strychnine. Five to ten milligrams of nux vomica causes an adverse reaction in adults, while 30 mg can result in death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref12">12</xref>]. In short, the convergence of uses of a plant to treat an ailment by successive generations, although an indication of the validity of its use, is not sufficient to attest to the efficacy and safety of a traditional remedy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref13">13</xref>]. Pharmacological and toxicological testing of medicinal plants to support and improve the use of herbal remedies is therefore very important. The identification of toxicological parameters such as acute toxicity, lethal dose, and IC<sub>50</sub> is necessary for remedies already used by the population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>To assess the toxicity of natural substances in vitro and in vivo toxicity of substances have been standardized. However, these tests are long, expensive, and require a large number of animals. In recent years, the world’s research and accreditation bodies promote low-cost, time-saving assays, and/or not requiring or reducing animal sacrifice assays. Therefore, in vitro toxicity assessment assays, such as cell viability or proliferation tests, hemolysis tests, and in vivo toxicity assays on algae (Chlamydomonas sp.), zebrafish (Danio rerio) and especially artemia (Artemia spp.) are in full expansion. What is more, these tests have the advantage of being effective with plant-based preparations of complex compositions and requiring very few specific skills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>BSLA (brine shrimp lethality assay) is used for the preliminary study of the natural products toxicity chemicals compounds, heavy metals, metal ions, cyanobacteria, algae, dental materials, nanoparticles and to screen marine natural products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref18">18</xref>]. The molecular, cellular, and physiological levels of Artemia spp. are drastically altered when in contact with even slight levels of contamination, it’s so an excellent predictive preclinical assay to estimate general toxicity, short-term acute (STA) and long-term chronic (LTC) toxicities, and lethal dose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>One’s medicinal plant to explore toxicological properties is Imperata cylindrica. Imperata cylindrica, a poaceae (Monocotyledon, Cyperales, Poaceae, Panicoides, Andropogones) is growing in tropical, subtropical, or warm temperate regions. In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, Imperata cylindrica is present throughout the territory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref20">20</xref>]. It is used as a decoction in anemia, sinusitis, fever, and gonorrhea cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref23">23</xref>]. In Asian pharmacopoeia, it’s associated or not with other plants, in decoction or maceration. Imperata cylindrica is renowned for its antihypertensive, neuroprotective, antibacterial, anthelmintic, astringent, anti-inflammatory, digestive, diuretic, emollient, febrifuge, hemostatic properties, and in particular its antidiarrheal property [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref26">26</xref>]. Unfortunately, bibliographic search did not provide toxicological data related to the Imperata cylindrica use. Imperata cylindrica could be toxic and its use dangerous for humans despite its use in traditional medicine.</p><p>The study hypothesis was, therefore, “Imperata cylindrica would be toxic and the lethality levels would be related to the extract type”.</p><p>Thus, the work consisted in evaluating Imperata cylindrica various raw extracts toxicity by brine shrimp lethality assay as a predictive acute toxicity data, a guide for toxicity assay, and a guide for the safe use of Imperata cylindrica extract by population.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Biological Material</title><p>Vegetal material consisted of Imperata cylindrica leaves and roots. They were harvested in Bouak&#233; in central C&#244;te d’Ivoire. The identification was done by Mr Tano Firmin Agronomist and Dr. Amadou Tour&#233; researcher/weed scientist at AfricaRice, Bouak&#233;. The plant material was then washed and dried in the shade for 7 days. It was finally pulverized and then stored in jars away from humidity.</p><p>For the animal material, the brine shrimp eggs (Artemia salina), one crustacean species, were used. They can be purchased at any pet store where they are sold for use as fish food. Hobby brand eggs were acquired from the company Aqua store (Auvergne-Rh&#244;ne-Alpes, France). The hatching system from JBL was used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Preparation of Crude Extracts</title><p>The macerates were obtained after 24 hours of 5 g shredded leaves and roots maceration in 100 mL in different solvents made of distilled water, 70% ethanol, and 30% acetone. Thus, there were 3 macerates for each organ. The decoctions were obtained from 500 g of shredded leaves and roots extracted 3 times under reflux for a 2 successive period, 1 h 30 and 1 h respectively in 2 L, 2 L and 1 L solvent. For each organ, the 3 filtrates were assembled, and the collection constituted the water, ethanolic and acetonic decoction extracts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref29">29</xref>]. The various filtrates were freeze-dried and then stored at −4˚C for the analyses.</p><p>The choice of solvent based on traditional using for water and exploration study for alcohol 70% and acetone 30%</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Determination of the Extract’s Phytochemical Composition</title><p>The phytochemical study based on the coloring and precipitation tests was carried out on Imperata cylindrica aqueous, ethanolic and acetonic extracts. The compounds targeted were alkaloids, polyphenolic compounds, terpene compounds, saponins, quinones, cardiac glycosides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref31">31</xref>].</p><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Detection of Alkaloids</title><p>6 mL of plant extract are evaporated. The residue is taken up in 6 mL of alcohol at 60˚ (alcoholic degree) and the alcoholic solution thus obtained is distributed in two test tubes. In the first tube are added 2 drops of Dragendorff reagent (aqueous solution of potassium iodo-bismuth). The appearance of a precipitate or an orange coloration indicates the presence of alkaloids. In the second tube, 2 drops of Bouchardat’s reagent (aqueous solution of iodo-iodide) are added. The appearance of a reddish-brown coloration indicates the presence of alkaloids.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Detection of Polyphenols</title><p>To 2 mL of plant extract, one drop of alcoholic solution of 2% ferric chloride is added. The appearance of a more or less dark blue-blackish or green coloration indicates the presence of phenolic compounds.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Identification of Tannins</title><p>1) Catechic tannins: 5 mL of extract are evaporated. To the dry residue, 15 mL of Stiasny reagent is added (10 mL of 40% formalin with 5 mL of concentrated HCl). The mixture is kept in a water bath at 80˚C for 30 min. Cool under a stream of water. The observation of large flaky precipitates characterizes the catechic tannins.</p><p>2) Gallic tannins: The solution containing catechic tannins is filtered and the filtrate collected is then saturated with sodium acetate. 3 drops of 2% ferric chloride are added to the mixture. The appearance of an intense blue-black coloration indicates the presence of gallic tannins.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Detection of Steroids</title><p>To 0.5 ml of extract are added 2 ml of anhydrous acetic acid and 2 ml of sulfuric acid H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The coloration then changes from purple to blue or green, showing the presence of steroids.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. Detection of Flavonoids</title><p>2 mL of plant extract are evaporated. After cooling, the residue is taken up by 5 mL of hydrochloric alcohol diluted 2 times in a test tube. Two to three magnesium chips are added (heat release). The addition of 3 drops of isoamyl alcohol intensifies a pink-orange or purplish coloration, indicating the presence of flavonoids.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_6"><title>2.3.6. Detection of Saponosides</title><p>10 mL of plant extract are put in a test tube. After shaking for a few minutes, the height of foam is measured. A foam height higher than 1 cm indicates the presence of saponosides. The saponosides can also be highlighted by the persistence of the foam.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_7"><title>2.3.7. Detection of Quinones</title><p>We use the reagent of Borntraeger (ammonia diluted 2 times) which allows the detection of quinone substances. 2 mL of plant extract is evaporated to dryness in a capsule. The residue is added to 5 mL of HCl diluted 5 times. The solution is placed in a boiling water bath for half an hour in a test tube. It is then cooled under a stream of cold water and the hydrolysate is extracted with 20 mL of chloroform into a test tube. The chloroform phase is collected in a test tube and 0.5 mL of 2-fold diluted ammonia is added. The appearance of a coloration going from red to purple indicates the presence of quinones.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_8"><title>2.3.8. Detection of Polyterpenes and Sterols</title><p>The Liebermann reagent is used for this detection. 5 mL of plant extract are dried under rotary evaporator. The residue is dissolved in 1 mL of acetic anhydride and collected in a test tube. Along the tube, 0.5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid is dripped. The appearance at interphase of a purple or violet ring, turning blue and then green, indicates the presence of polyterpenes and sterols.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_9"><title>2.3.9. Detection of Cardiac Glycosides (Keller-Killani Test)</title><p>5 ml of extract are treated with 2 ml of glacial acetic acid added with a drop of iron chloride solution. The addition of 1 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid reveals a brown ring at the interface indicating the presence of a deoxygenated sugar characteristic of cardenolides.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Artemia salina Larvae Lethality Assay</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Brine Shrimp Hatching</title><p>Brine shrimp cyst was hatched in a hatching system. Twenty-five (25) mg to 1 g of artemia cyst were incubated at 28˚C in 1 L artificial seawater (23 g NaCl, 11 g MgCl<sub>2</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O, 4 g Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 1.3 g CaCl<sub>2</sub>∙2H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.7 g KCl in 1 L distilled water.) under continuous light and aeration. After 24 h incubation, 15 mL 0.06% yeast solution was added to the hatching media. After additional 24 hours incubation, the larvae which reached the stage of instar II and III were collected for the lethality assay.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay (BLSA)</title><p>The different extract at the range concentrations from 10 to 1.25 mg/mL was prepared by the half dilution method. In a hemolysis tubes batch, each containing 0.5 mL of defined concentration’s extract, 10 artemia larvae were introduced and then the mixture volume was adjusted to 5 mL with artificial seawater (0.5 mL extract + 4.5 mL sea water + 10 artemia larvae). The final concentration of the extracts in the test tubes was then 1; 0.5; 0.25 and 0.125 mg/mL. The test was done in triplicate. The test tubes were then incubated at 20˚C &#177; 0.5˚C. Lethality effect of extract was determined after 24 hours. As artemia larvae very mobile, the larva was considered dead after 10 s of immobility. Potassium dichromate was used as a positive control with a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL; 0.05 mg/mL; 0.025 mg/mL and 0.0125 mg/mL in the test tubes. Artificial seawater was used as negative control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref33">33</xref>]. Percentage mortality was calculated according to Equation (1).</p><p>Mortality   ( % ) = ( Diedlarvae's ) / ( Totallarvae's   number ) ∗ 100 (1)</p><p>The mortality percentage is then corrected for the percentage of natural deaths using Abbott’s formula Equation (2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>P = P i − C / 1 − C (2)</p><p>P being the corrected mortality rate,Pi the observed mortality rate and C the natural mortality rate.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The data obtained from the tests were processed using XLSTAT 2014. The analysis of different average (n = 3) was done with the Student-Newman Keuls test. The population (LC<sub>50</sub>) lethal concentration at 50% is determined using the Probit regression analysis system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref35">35</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Phytochemical Screening</title><p>The phytochemical screening results of Imperata cylindrica rhizomes and leaves’ extracts, summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, indicates the presence of alkaloids, polyphenolic compounds, saponins and polyterpenoid compounds.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Extracts Effect on Brine Shrimp Larvae</title><p>The results of the artemia larvae mortality rate towards the different Imperata cylindrica extracts are reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The variables given the highest mortality rate are roots, organic solvents (ethanol, acetone) and decoction. From the study of the mortality rate according to the concentration, it appears that it increases with this one. The concentration which gives the highest percentage of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Phytochemical screening of Imperata cylindrica leaves and roots extracts</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Plant Metabolites</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Roots</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Leaves</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Alcohol 70% Water Acetone30%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Alcohol 70% Water Acetone 30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alkaloids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyphenols</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flavonoids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyterpenoids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gal Tannins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cat Tannins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saponins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quinones</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>+: Presence; −: Absence; Gal: Gallic; Cat: Catechin.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Imperata cylindra raw extracs’s mortality rate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.31 &#177; 0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.22 &#177; 0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decoction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.83 &#177; 0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maceration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.69 &#177; 0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acetone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.58 &#177; 0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethanol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.71 &#177; 0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.50 &#177; 0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 &#181;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.72 &#177; 0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 &#181;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.67 &#177; 0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >250 &#181;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67 &#177; 0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >125 &#181;g/mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 &#177; 0.65</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>mortality (79.72%) is observed at 1000 &#181;g/mL and the lowest rate (0%) at 125 &#181;g/mL.</p><p>The lethal concentration 50 (LC<sub>50</sub>) of the Imperata cylindrica extracts and potassium dichromate are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>The aqueous extracts of the leaves proving not to be lethal, the LC<sub>50</sub> of the ethanolic and acetonic extracts, was between 489.78 &#181;g/mL and 1066.6 &#181;g/mL. The smallest LC<sub>50</sub> was obtained by the ethanolic macerate. As for the root extracts, the LC<sub>50</sub> ranged from 341.98 &#181;g/mL to 1530 &#181;g/mL, the smallest value being obtained by the aqueous decocted.</p><p>The LC<sub>50</sub>s of the extracts were all higher than the LC<sub>50</sub> of potassium dichromate (63.83 &#181;g/mL).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Brine shrimp larvae mortality rate in probit at different concentrations, and LC<sub>50</sub> value of Imperata cylindrica extracts</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Extracts</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >125 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >250 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >500 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1000 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LC<sub>50</sub> &#181;g/mL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICFEOm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NL</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICFEEm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >489.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICFEAm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1066.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICFEOd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NL</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICFEEd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >707.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICFEAd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >630.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICREOm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1530</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICREEm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >411.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICREAm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICREOd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >341.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICREEd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442.89</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ICR: Imperata cylindrica root; ICF: Imperata cylindrica leaves; EO: aqueous extract; EE: alco holic extract 70%; EA: acetone extract 30%; indices m and d: maceration and decoction; NL: Non-Lethal.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Brine shrimp larvae mortality rate in probits at different concentrations and LC<sub>50</sub> value of potassium dichromate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Extracts</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >12.5 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >100 &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LC<sub>50</sub> &#181;g/mL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.827</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >% Mortality expressed in Probit at different concentrations</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Compared to other plant families, Poaceae are more generally recognized for properties other than medicinal. Imperata cylindrica, a Poaceae member is not left out of this observation. It is much more recognized for its devastating properties than medicinal ones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref37">37</xref>]. In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, very few articles mention its use in traditional medicine. The different extracts analysis, however, shows that Imperata cylindrica contains secondary metabolites which have shown many medicinal properties in various studies. One compound type revealed in the aqueous, ethanolic and acetone crude extracts of Imperata cylindrica roots and leaves are alkaloids. These results are consistent with Laltanpuii et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref38">38</xref>], and Sudha et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref39">39</xref>] results. The alkaloids properties are as diverse as their structure is varied. They are endowed with anti-neurodegenerative, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiparasitic, antiplasmodial, antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-HIV, neuro-stimulant activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref41">41</xref>]. Our results are consistent with some scientific research concluding the presence of alkaloid.</p><p>Another compounds group identified during the study is the saponified compounds group. This result is contrary to Bamba outputs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref22">22</xref>], but it agrees with Bashige et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref42">42</xref>] and Lalthanpuii et al. results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref38">38</xref>]. Plant extracts rich in saponins due to their foamy nature are irritating orally but the less irritating ones are generally used as cough suppressants and expectorants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref43">43</xref>]. Saponins have hypo-cholesterolemic, anti-inflammatory and anti-diarrheal properties, particularly on diseases water-related diarrhea and rotavirus infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref46">46</xref>]. The I. cylindrica use in feverish states and in diarrhea cases in a traditional environment could therefore be explained by the saponins presence.</p><p>Finally, the third large secondary metabolites family revealed in this work are those of polyphenolic compounds, as also noted by Iram et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref47">47</xref>] in aerial part of I. cylindrica. Numerous studies have shown the preventive and/or therapeutic effects that polyphenols could have on chronic diseases, metabolic diseases, neuro-degenerative diseases, cell proliferation, inflammatory, diarrheal, viral, bacterial conditions and many other so-called non-communicable diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref50">50</xref>]. The polyphenols effect on these many conditions is due to its antioxidant property and its ability to regulate certain intra- and inter-cellular signaling pathways. In inflammatory diseases, for example, polyphenols can modulate the pro-inflammatory molecules synthesis (cytokines, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6.4) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref52">52</xref>].</p><p>The presence of these different components can explain the different traditional using of Imperata cylindrica</p><p>All the molecules responsible for the biological and plants medicinal properties can also be responsible for their toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref53">53</xref>]. The brine shrimp larvae first use in bioassays was by Michael et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref54">54</xref>] and since then the method has been standardized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref55">55</xref>]. Unlike other in vivo study methods which are expensive, time-consuming and which require certain qualifications and infrastructures, the Artemia larvae use as a model has the advantage of being inexpensive, easy to acquire, rapid, does not require specific skills or infrastructures. Artemia larvae also have a high sensitivity to many compounds ranging from heavy metals to medicinal substances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref56">56</xref>].</p><p>This work that aim was also to evaluate the lethality level of Imperata cylindrica crude extracts against brine shrimp, showed that the larvae mortality rate was related to different parameters. The mortality level depends on the extraction type solvent. Here organic extracts (ethanol 70% and acetone 30%) had the highest mortality (32.7% et 34.5%) rate than aqueous extract (17.5%). The same report was done by Sharaibi and Afolayan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref57">57</xref>] and Alencar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref58">58</xref>]. The first authors, who worked on Acetonic, Aqueous and Methanolic of Agapanthus praecox Willd leaf extracts found that methanol extract (78.53%) and acetone extract (50.22%), had highest mortality rate against brine shrimp compared to aqueous extract (42.35%). The second authors also found the high mortality rate of Palythoa caribaeorum organic extracts (70% EtOH, dichloromethane (DCM), ethyl acetate (EtOAc) than aqueous ones. This high mortality rate of organic extracts can be explained by the fact they have a higher extracting potential. Furthermore, this study showed that decocted extracts had high mortality rate. High temperatures cause a decrease in viscosity and surface tension, which allows better penetration of the solvent into the sample matrix. Also, it increases the molecular movement by accelerating the mass transfer into solvent of intracellular bioactive compounds from the plant matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref59">59</xref>]. These events can elevate extraction yield and compound extracted which could influence toxicity rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref28">28</xref>]. Moreover, the role of solvent polarity in the quantity and quality of crude extracts, secondary metabolites, and biological activities has been previously reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref62">62</xref>]. This can explain why most of the same family compounds are present in the different extract but the toxicity rate is different. Moreover, the mortality rate average was concentration dependent with the maximum at 1000 &#181;g/mL and the minimum at 250 &#181;g/mL. This tendency is corroborated by Aliyu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref63">63</xref>] which concluded at the end of their study on ten poaceae toxicity that the mortality growth with concentration and the maximum and the minimum mortality rate take place at respectively 1000 &#181;g/ml and 10 &#181;g/mL.</p><p>In addition to the above parameters, our study showed that plant material is an important parameter in Imperata cylindrica toxicity assessment. Indeed, root extracts (39.31%) showed a significantly higher mortality rate (p &lt; 0.0001) than leaves (17.22%) by about 2.3 times. This finding is shared by Wakawa &amp; Fasihunddi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref64">64</xref>], who during their toxicity study of Abrus precatorus, observed that root extracts had about 1.3 to 4.2 times higher toxicity than leaf extracts. And this result of our study could explain the preferential use of roots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref65">65</xref>] in traditional medicine.</p><p>The toxicity evaluation parameter of the extract in this study is the lethal concentration 50 (LC<sub>50</sub>) which is the concentration that causes 50% brine shrimp larvae mortality. The lower the LC<sub>50</sub>, the greater the toxicity of the analyzed element is. The plant extracts toxicity is generally interpreted based on Meyer’s or Clarkson’s toxicity indices. According to Meyer, toxic bioactive extracts and non-toxic extracts are extracts with an LC<sub>50</sub> respectively lower and higher than 1000 &#181;g/mL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref55">55</xref>]. Referring therefore to Meyer classification, herein study showed that apart from the aqueous leaves’ extracts, the aqueous’roots (1530 &#181;g/mL) and leaves acetone macerates (1066 &#181;g/mL), all the others were toxic and biologically active, because having an LC<sub>50</sub> less than 1000 &#181;g/ml (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). These results disagree with Wong et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref66">66</xref>] work, which showed that Imperata cylindrica roots ethanolic (90%) extract with an LC<sub>50</sub> of 5490.2 &#181;g/ml could be considered non-toxic. Iram et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref47">47</xref>] showed that Imperata cylindrica aerial part ethanolic and acetone extracts could be toxic with LC<sub>50</sub> of 11.00 &#181;g/mL and 7.93 &#181;g/mL, respectively. So, these results are conformed to herein study. In fact, aqueous decoction, roots ethanolic and acetone extracts LC<sub>50</sub> are less than 1000 &#181;g/mL (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The polarity of the extraction solvent and therefore the quantity and quality of the extracted compounds can explain the difference between the toxicity results.</p><p>Besides Meyer classification, Clarkson classification is used in toxicity assessment. It allows being a little more precise in the toxicity degree assessment. According to Clarkson, substances with an LC<sub>50</sub> &gt; 1000 μg/mL are considered non-toxic, weakly toxic those with 500 μg/mL &lt; LC<sub>50</sub> &lt; 1000 μg/mL, moderately toxic those with 100 μg/mL &lt; LC<sub>50</sub> &lt; 500 μg/ml and extremely toxic those with an LC<sub>50</sub> &lt; 100 &#181;g/mL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref67">67</xref>]. Thus, according to the present study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), and as Sunandar Ihsan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref68">68</xref>] and Aliyu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref63">63</xref>] also observed, the root extracts are moderately toxic (LC<sub>50</sub>: 168.47 &#181;g/mL), and leaf extracts are weakly toxic (LC<sub>50</sub>: 527.25 &#181;g/mL).</p><p>The data on the larvae mortality rate according to different extracts concentrations define the harmlessness at maximum and minimum concentrations in order to prevent possible acute intoxication. These data could also serve as a basis for future in vivo toxicity testing Ohikhena et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref69">69</xref>]. Besides, many previous works have shown a good correlation between toxicity on brine shrimp larvae and many in vivo and in vitro cytotoxicity tests with 80 to 90% correlation coefficients order [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref70">70</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref71">71</xref>]. Thus, Parra et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref72">72</xref>] showed a good correlation (r = 0.85) in acute oral toxicity in mice between LC<sub>50</sub> and the LD<sub>50</sub> (LD stands for “Lethal Dose”. LD<sub>50</sub>, used to measure acute toxicity, is the amount of a material, given all at once, which causes the death of 50% of a group of test animals). According to them, when the lethality test gives an LC<sub>50</sub> &lt; 10 μg/mL, the extract LD<sub>50</sub> is between 100 and 1000 mg/kg; LC<sub>50</sub> &lt; 20 μg/mL the LD<sub>50</sub> is between 1000 and 2500 mg/kg, and when the LC<sub>50</sub> &gt; 25 μg/mL the LD<sub>50</sub> is between 2500 and 8000 mg/kg. Thus, according to the correlation defined by Parra et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref72">72</xref>], the crude extracts LD<sub>50</sub> in the present study are between 2500 and 8000 mg/kg. These results are consistent with Nayim et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref73">73</xref>] and Chunlaratthanaphorn etal. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref74">74</xref>] observations. Of course, they determined a LD<sub>50</sub> &gt; 5000 mg/kg in rats for Imperata cylindrica methanolic and aqueous extracts. Thus, herein results could make it possible to classify Imperata cylindrica crude total extracts as slightly to Almost non-toxic in mice on the Hodge and Sterner scale (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref75">75</xref>]. Also, for the LD<sub>50</sub> range (2500 mg/kg - 8000 mg/kg) of our crude extracts. So, 70 kg person</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Hodge and sterner scale</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Route administration</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LD<sub>50</sub> oral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LC<sub>50</sub> inhalation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LD<sub>50</sub> dermal</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxicity Index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Terms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Single dose to rats) mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4 h rats’ exposure) ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Single dermal application rabbit skin) mg/kg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 or less</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 or less</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 or less</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Highly toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 to 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 to 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 to 43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderately toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 to 500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 to 1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 to 340</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slightly toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 to 5000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 to 10,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350 to 2810</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Almost nontoxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5000 to 15,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,000 to 100,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2820 to 22,590</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Relatively harmless</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15,000 or more</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,600 or more</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Gosselin, Smith and Hodge scale</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Probably lethal oral dose (human)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxicity Index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Terms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dose (mg/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >For 70 Kg weight person</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Super toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 grain (a pinch less than 7 drops)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extremely toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 to 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 mL</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 to 500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 mL</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderately toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 to 5000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 to 600 mL</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slightly toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5000 to 15,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600 to 1200 mL</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Almost not toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 15,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 1200 mL</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>should receive a dose in the range (2500 mg/kg &#215; 70 - 8000 mg/kg &#215; 70) or (175 g - 560 g) of extract in one go orally to run the same risks. On the Gosselin, Smith and Hodge scale, our crude extracts could be classified as almost non-toxic to humans by the oral route [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119337-ref75">75</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The chemical composition and toxicity of brine shrimp larvae of Imperata cylindrica roots and leaves crude aqueous, ethanolic, and acetone extracts have been characterized. The results showed the presence of alkaloids, polyphenolics, saponins, and polyterpenoids. All the extracts have an LC<sub>50</sub> between 341.98 and 1530 &#181;g/mL on brine shrimp larvae. These results correspond to a LD<sub>50</sub> between 2500 mg/kg and 8000 mg/kg in mice. According to Clarkson classification, root extracts are moderately toxic (LC<sub>50</sub>: 168.47 &#181;g/mL), and leaf extracts are weakly toxic (LC<sub>50</sub>: 527.25 &#181;g/mL) on brine shrimp. These extracts are almost non-toxic to humans orally. These results justify Imperata cylindrica safe use and especially the roots in a traditional environment. Another toxicological assay must be done to confirm and expand data on sub-acute toxicity and the effect on different organs.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank the Pasteur Institute of C&#244;te d’Ivoire for providing the biological material. Also, they acknowledge National Polytechnic Institute Felix Houphouet-Boigny for the technical support.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Konan, A.M.L., Golly, K.J., Kra, A.K.M., Adima, A.A. and Lohoues, E.E.C. (2022) Phytochemical Screening and Toxicity Assessment of Imperata cylindrica (L.) P. Beauv. (Poaceae) Raw Extracts with Brine Shrimp (Artemia salina) Lethality Assay. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 10, 153-171. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2022.108014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119337-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rajabi, S., Ramazani, A., Hamidi, M. and Naji, T. (2015) Artemia salina as a Model Organism in Toxicity Assessment of Nanoparticles. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 23, Article No. 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40199-015-0105-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parra, A.L., Yhebra, R.S., Sardinas, I.G. and Buela, L.I. (2001) Comparative Study of the Assay of Artemia salina L. and the Estimate of the Medium Lethal Dose (LD50 Value) in Mice, to Determine Oral Acute Toxicity of Plant Extracts. Phytomedicine, 8, 395-400. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-7113-00044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nayim, P., Mbaveng, A.T., Ntyam, A.M. and Kuete, V. (2020) A Botanical from the Antiproliferative Cameroonian Spice, Imperata cylindrica Is Safe at Lower Doses, as Demonstrated by Oral Acute and Sub-Chronic Toxicity Screenings. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 20, Article No. 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03064-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chunlaratthanaphorn, S., Lertprasertsuke, N., Srisawat, U., Thuppia, A., Ngamjariyawat, A., Suwanlikhid, N. and Jaijoy, K. (2007) Acute and Subchronic Toxicity Study of the Water Extract from Root of Imperata cylindrica (Linn.) Raeusch in Rats. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 29, 141-155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CCHST (2021) Fiche d’information réponse. https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/chemicals/ld50.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altomare, C., Pernfuss, B. and Strasser, H. (2012) Assessing Potential Cytotoxicity of Biocontrol Microorganism Using Invertebrate Assays. In: Beneficial Microorganisms in Agriculture, Food and the Environment: Safety Assessment and Regulation, CABI, London, 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845938109.0240</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ohikhena, F.U., Wintola, O.A. and Afolayan, A.J. (2016) Toxicity Assessment of Different Solvent Extracts of the Medicinal Plant, Phragmanthera capitata (Sprengel) Balle on Brine Shrimp (Artemia salina). International Journal of Pharmacology, 12, 701-710. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2016.701.710</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sunandar</surname><given-names> I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Henny</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Suryani</surname><given-names> Nur</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.</surname><given-names> Ardiyanti</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Zulfikar</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Rahmat</surname><given-names> D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Elsa</surname><given-names> A. and Ruslin </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2019</year>)<article-title>Level of Toxicity and Phytochemical Screening of Lansau Traditional Medicine of Muna Tribe from Southeast Sulawesi</article-title><source> Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 10076</fpage>-<lpage>10080</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clarkson, C., Maharaj, V.J., Crouch, N.R., Grace, O.M., Pillay, P., Matsabisa, M.G., Bhagwandin, N., Smith, P.J. and Folb, P.I. (2004) In Vitro Antiplasmodial Activity of Medicinal Plants Native to or Naturalized in South Africa. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 92, 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, F.-C., Chai, T.-T. and Hoo, Y.-W. (2012) Antioxidation and Cytotoxic Activities of Selected Medicinal Herbs Used in Malaysia. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 6, 3169-3175. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR11.1631</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syamsul, H. and Arief, N.R. (2017) Utilization of Alang-Alang (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch.) as Traditional Medicine in Indonesian Archipelago. The 1st Satreps Conference, Bogor, 14 November 2016, 82-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wakana, H.Y. and Fasihunddin, B.A. (2016) Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay of Abrus pecatorius (Linn) Leaves and Root Extract. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9, 179-181. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i1.15057</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aliyu, M.A., Abdullahi, A.A. and Ugya, A.Y. (2017) Toxicity Screening of Selected Poaceae Species in Kano, Northern Nigeria. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 3, 135-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tir, R., Dutta, P.C. and Badjah-Hadj-Ahmed, A.Y. (2012) Effect of the Extraction Solvent Polarity on the Sesame Seeds Oil Composition. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 114, 1427-1438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201200129</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rafińska, K., Pomastowski, P., Rudnicka, J., Krakowska, A., Maruska, A., Narkute, M. and Buszewski, B. (2019) Effect of Solvent and Extraction Technique on Composition and Biological Activity of Lepidium sativum Extracts. Food Chemistry, 289, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nguyen, N.-V.T., Duong, N.T., Nguyen, K.-N.H., Bui, N.T., Pham, T.-L.T., Nguyen, K.T., Le, P.H. and Kim, K.-H. (2022) Effect of Extraction Solvent on Total Phenol, Flavonoid Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Avicennia officinalis. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry, 12, 2678-2690. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC122.26782690</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chaves, J.O., de Souza, M.C., da Silva, L.C., Lachos-Perez, D., Torres-Mayanga, P.C., Machado, A.P.F., Forster-Carneiro, T., Vázquez-Espinosa, M., González-de-Peredo, A.V., Barbero, G.F., et al. (2020) Extraction of Flavonoids from Natural Sources Using Modern Techniques. Frontiers in Chemistry, 8, Article ID: 507887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.507887</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alencar, D.B., Melo, A.A., Silva, G.C., Lima, R.L., Pires-Cavalcante, K.M.S., Carneiro, R.F., Rabelo, A.S., Sousa, O.V., Vieira, R.H.S.F., Viana, F.A., et al. (2015) Antioxidant, Hemolytic, Antimicrobial, and Cytotoxic Activities of the Tropical Atlantic Marine Zoanthid Palythoa caribaeorum. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 87, 1113-1123. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140370</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharaibi, O.J. and Afolayan, A.J. (2018) Phytochemical Analysis and Toxicity Evaluation of Acetone, Aqueous and Methanolic Leaf Extracts of Agapanthus praecox Willd. Journal of Complementary Medicine &amp; Alternative Healthcare, 7, Article ID: 555722. https://doi.org/10.19080/JCMAH.2018.07.555722</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rotini, A., Manfra, L., Canepa, S., Tornambe, A. and Migliore, L. (2015) Can Artemia Hatching Assay Be a (Sensitive) Alternative Tool to Acute Toxicity Test? Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 95, 745-751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1626-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyer, B.N., Ferrigni, N.R., Putnam, J.E., Jacobsen, L.B., Nichols, D.E. and McLaughlin, J.L. (1982) Brine Shrimp: A Convenient General Bioassay for Active Plant Constituents. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 45, 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971236</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michael, A.S., Thampson, C.G. and Abramoritz, M. (1956) Artemia salina as a Test Organism for Bioassay. Science, 123, Article No. 464. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.123.3194.464</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dosumu, O., Oluwaniy, O.O. and Oyedeji, O.O. (2013) Phytochemical Screening and Brine Shrimp Assay Investigation of Vegetables Commonly Consumed in Southern and North Central Parts of Nigeria. Centrepoint Journal, 19, 79-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marimoutou, M., Le Sage, F., Smadja, J., Lefebvre, d’H.C., Gonthier, M.-P. and Robert, D.-S.C. (2015) Antioxidant Polyphenol-Rich Extracts from the Medicinal Plants Antirhea borbonica, Doratoxylon apetalum and Gouania mauritiana Protect 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes against H2O2, TNFα and LPS Inflammatory Mediators by Regulating the Expression of Superoxide Dismutase and NF-κB Genes. Journal of Inflammation, 12, Article No. 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-015-0055-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fraga, C.G., Croft, K.D., Kennedy, D.O. and Tomás-Barberán, F.A. (2019) The Effects of Polyphenols and Other Bioactives on Human Health. Food &amp; Function Journal, 10, 514-528. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FO01997E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cano-Avendano, B.A., Carmona-Hernandez, J.C., Rodriguez, R.E., Taborda-Ocampo, G. and González-Correa, C.H. (2021) Chemical Properties of Polyphenols: A Review Focused on Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Viral Medical Application. Biomedicine, 41, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.51248/.v41i1.524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cory, H., Passarelli, S., Szeto, J., Tamez, M. and Mattei, J. (2018) The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 5, Article No. 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dover, A., Patel, N. and Park, K.T. (2015) Rapid Cessation of Acute Diarrhea Using a Novel Solution of Bioactive Polyphenols: A Randomized Trial in Nicaraguan Children. Peer Journal, 3, e969. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.969</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iram, F., Sobia, K. and Tariq, M. (2018) Evaluation of Biological Potential of Selected Species of Family Poaceae from Bahawalpur, Pakistan. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 18, Article No. 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2092-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, X.-B., Liu, Y.-P., Yang, Y.-Y., Liu, X.-Y. and Xiang, D.-X. (2016) Anti-Arthritic Effect of Total Saponins from Clematis henryi Oliv. on Collagen-Induced Arthritis Rats. European Journal of Inflammation, 14, 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727X16644448</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, Y., Guo, R., Wang, X., Yuan, D., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Yan, X. and Wang, C. (2014) The Regulation of Alfalfa Saponin Extract on Key Genes Involved in Hepatic Cholesterol Metabolism in Hyperlipidemic Rats. PLOS ONE, 9, e88282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088282</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, A.M. (2013) Saponins as Agents Preventing Infection Caused by Common Waterborne Pathogens. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, 126 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daniel, M. and Denni, M. (2016) Analytical Methods for Medicinal Plants and Economic Botany. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, 290 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bashige, V.C., Bakari, A.S., Okusa, P.N., Kalonda, E.M. and Lumbu, J.-B.S. (2020) Criblage phytochimique et activité antimicrobienne de six rhizomes comestibles utilisés en médecine traditionnelle à Lubumbashi (RDC). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14, 1367-1380. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i4.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sicong, L., Xin, L., Xiaoran, C. and Lei, B. (2020) Research Progress on Anti-Inflammatory Effects and Mechanisms of Alkaloids from Chinese Medical Herbs. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2020, Article ID: 1303524. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1303524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hussain, G., Rasul, A., Anwar, H., Aziz, N., Razzaq, A., Wei, W., Ali, M., Li, J. and Li, X. (2018) Role of Plant Derived Alkaloids and Their Mechanism in Neurodegenerative Disorders. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 14, 341-357. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.23247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sudha, R., Kaleena, P.K., Babu, M., Janaki, A., Velu, K. and Elumalai, D. (2018) Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant and Anticancer Potential of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch against Human Breast Cancer Cell Line (mcf-7). International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 8, 938-945.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lalthanpuii, P.B. and Zarzokimi, L.K. (2018) Imperata cylindrica: A Noxious Weed of Pharmacological Potentials in Advances in Engineering Research Perspective and Trends in the Development of Science Education and Research. Atlantis Press, Paris, 173-177. https://doi.org/10.2991/msc-18.2018.28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gebashe, F., Aremu, A.O., Finnie, J.F. and Van Staden, J. (2019) Grasses in South African Traditional Medicine: A Review of Their Biological Activities and Phytochemical Content. South African Journal of Botany, 122, 301-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.10.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cerdeira, A.L., Cantrell, C.L., Dayan, F.E., Byrd, J.D. and Duke, S.O. (2012) Tabanone, a New Phytotoxic Constituent of Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica). Weed Sciences, 60, 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00160.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Finney, D.J. (1971) Probit Analysis. 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, London, 350 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geethaa, S., Thavamany, P.J., Chiew, S.P. and Thong, O.M. (2013) Interference from Ordinarily Used Solvents in the Outcomes of Artemia salina Lethality Test. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology &amp; Research, 4, 179-182. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.121411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shifah, F., Tareq, A.M., Sayeed, M.A., Islam, M.N., Emran, T.B., Ullah, A., Mukit, M.A. and Ullah, A. (2020) Antidiarrheal, Cytotoxic and Thrombolytic Activities of Methanolic Extract of Hedychium coccineum Leaves. Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics, 3, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.5455/jabet.2020.d110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Libralato, G., Prato, E., Migliore, L., Cicero, A.M. and Manfra, L. (2016) A Review of Toxicity Testing Protocols and Endpoints with Artemia spp. Ecological Indicators, 69, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Golly, K.J., Siaka, S., Soro, Y., Guessennd, N., Dosso, M. and Djaman, A.J. (2015) Phytochemical Study and Antimicrobial Activity of Bark Extracts of Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. (Bombacaceae) from C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire on Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. British Microbiology Research Journal, 9, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2015/18103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nancy, R.I.M., Meenashree, B. and Vasanthi, V.J. (2014) Screening of Antibacterial Activity and Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Phytochemicals in Vitex trifolia. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 3, 425-431.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, X.-R., Wang, J.-H., Jiang, B., Shang, J. and Zhao, C.-Q. (2013) A Study of Extraction Process and in Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Total Phenols from Rhizoma Imperatae. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 10, 175-178. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajtcam.v10i4.28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dent, M., Dragovic-Uzelac, V., Penic, M., Brncic, M.L., Bosiljkov, T. and Levaj, B. (2013) The Effect of Extraction Solvents, Temperature and Time on the Composition and Mass Fraction of Polyphenols in Dalmatian Wild Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) Extracts. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 51, 84-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zirihi, G., Kra, M.A.K. and Guédé-Guina, F. (2003) évaluation de l’activité antiongique de Microglossa pyrifolia (Lamarck) O. Kantze (Asteraceae) Pyni sur la croissance in Vitro de Candida albicans. Revue de Médecine et de Pharmacie, 17, 11-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruslin, Asmawi, Z.M., Rianse, U., Sahindi, I., Diah, D. andreanus, A.S. and Lia, A. (2013) Antihypertensive Activity of Alang-Alang Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. Root Methanolic Extract on Male Wistar Rat. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Science, 4, 537-542.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Padma, R., Parvathy, N.G., Renjith, V. and Kalpana, P.R. (2013) Quantitative Estimation of Tannins, Phenols, and Antioxidant Activity of Methanolic Extract of Imperata cylindrica. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Science, 4, 73-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, R.-H., Chen, S.-S., Ren, G., Shao, F. and Huang, H.-L. (2013) Phenolic Compounds from Roots of Imperata cylindrica var. Major. Chinese Herbal Medicine, 5, 240-243.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">JSTOR (2021) Imperata cylindrica. http://plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/al.ap.upwta.2_573</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bamba, M. (2013) Criblage Phytochimique et Evaluation de L’activite Antibacterienne De Dix (10) Plantes Medicinales De La Region Du Bafing (C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire). DEA, Mémoire, Université Nanguy Abrogoua-C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koné, W.M., Koffi, A.G., Bomisso, E.L. and Tra-Bi, F.H. (2012) Ethnomedical Study and Iron Content of Some Medicinal Herbs Used in Traditional Medicine in C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire for the Treatment of Anaemia. African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 9, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajtcam.v9i1.12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouakou, J.K., Yapi, A., Alui, A.K., Faustin, O.A. and Yao-Kouame, A. (2016) Pédopaysage et distribution de Imperata cylindrica (L.) P. Beauv. (Poaceae) dans deux Agro-écosystèmes de la C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire: Abidjan et Bouaké. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research, 22, 238-249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Epole, N.N., Eva, M.D.-M., Amilcar, R., Joana, T., Vera, M.S.I., Paula, P., Maria-Joao, C. and Patrícia, R. (2020) Artemia Species: An Important Tool to Screen General Toxicity Samples. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 26, 2892-2908. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612826666200406083035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamidi, М.R., Jovanova, B. and Panovska, Т.K. (2014) Toxicоlogical Evaluation of the Plant Products Using Brine Shrimp (Artemia salina L.). Macedonian Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 60, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.33320/maced.pharm.bull.2014.60.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, J.-W., Ho, Y.-J., Ciou, S.-C. and Gong, Z. (2017) Innovative Disease Model: Zebrafish as an In Vivo Platform for Intestinal Disorder and Tumors. Biomedicines, 5, Article No. 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines5040058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Yin, L. and Jie, Y. (2019) A Well-Established Method for the Rapid Assessment of Toxicity Using Artemia spp. Model. In: El-Din Saleh, H., Ed., Assessment and Management of Radioactive and Electronic Wastes, IntechOpen, London, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85730</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orsine, J.V.C., da Costa, R.V., da Silva, R.C., Santos, M.D.F., Menezes, A. and Novaes, M.R.C.G. (2012) The Acute Cytotoxicity and Lethal Concentration (LC50) of Agaricus sylvaticus through Hemolytic Activity on Human Erythrocyte. International Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 4, 19-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Riss, T.L., Moravec, R.A., Niles, A.L., Duellman, S., Benink, H.A., Worzella, T.J. andMinor, L. (2013) Cell Viability Assays. In: Sittampalam, G.S., Coussens, N.P. and Brimacombe, K., et al., Eds., Assay Guidance Manual, Eli Lilly &amp; Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, 1-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coquart, J. (2013) Médicaments: L’officine de la nature. Sciences &amp; santé numéro 13. https://www.ipubli.inserm.fr/bitstream/handle/10608/7097/2013_13_24.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Woo, C.S.J., Lau, J.S.H. and El-Nezami, H. (2012) Herbal Medicine: Toxicity and Recent Trends. In: Lie-Fen, S. and Allan, S.Y., Eds., Assessing Their Potential Toxic Effects, Advances in Botanical Research, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394591-4.00009-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Craig, W.J. (1999) Health-Promoting Properties of Common Herbs. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70, 491S-499S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/70.3.491s</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larrey, D. (2005) Hépatotoxicité de la phytothérapie. https://www.fmcgastro.org/postu-main/archives/postu-2005-paris/hepato-toxicite-de-la-phytotherapie</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Surh, I., Brix, A., French, J.E., Collins, B.J., Sanders, J.M., Vallant, M. and Dunnick, J.K. (2013) Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Study of Senna in the C3B6.129F1-Trp53tm1Brd N12 Haploinsufficient Mice. Toxicologic Pathology, 41, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623312464304</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, J., Webster, D., Cao, J. and Shao, A. (2018) The Safety of Green Tea and Green Tea Extract Consumption in Adults—Results of a Systematic Review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 95, 412-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xie, J.-T., Mehendale, S.R., Maleckar, S.A. and Yuan, C.-S. (2002) Is Ginseng Free from Adverse Effects? Advances in Traditional Medicine, 2, 80-86. https://doi.org/10.3742/OPEM.2002.2.2.080</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ernst, E. (2002) The Risk-Benefit Profile of Commonly Used Herbal Therapies: Ginkgo, St. John’s Wort, Ginseng, Echinacea, Saw Palmetto, and Kava. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-1-200201010-00010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, Y.-S., Woo, J.-Y., Han, C.-K. and Chang, I.-M. (2015) Safety Analysis of Panax ginseng in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Medicines, 2, 106-126. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines2020106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mei, N., Guo, X., Ren, Z., Kobayashi, D., Wada, K. and Guo, L. (2017) Review of Ginkgo biloba-Induced Toxicity, from Experimental Studies to Human Case Reports. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, 35, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2016.1278298</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, H.F., Zanariah, H., Wong, T.S., Nur, S.A.R., Ain, N.Z. and Fadzilah, A.A.M. (2017) Comparative Study of Herbal Plants on the Phenolic and Flavonoid Content, Antioxidant Activities and Toxicity on Cells and Zebrafish Embryo. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, 7, 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiwari, P., Kumar, B., Kaur, M., Kaur, G. and Kaur, H. (2011) Phytochemical Screening and Extraction: A Review. Internationale Pharmaceutica Sciencia, 1, 98-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119337-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akinmoladun, A.C., Falaiye, O.E., Ojo, O.B., Adeoti, A., Amoo, Z.A. and Olaleye, M.T. (2022) Effect of Extraction Technique, Solvent Polarity, and Plant Matrix on the Antioxidant Properties of Chrysophyllum albidum G. Don (African Star Apple). Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 46, Article No. 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00718-y</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>