<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2022.138053</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-119307</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Microbiological Assessment and Shelf-Life Determination of Wheat Muffins Enriched with Domesticated African Emperor Moth (&lt;i&gt;Gonimbrasia zambesina&lt;/i&gt; Walker) Caterpillar Flour
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fedinand</surname><given-names>Opondo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alice</surname><given-names>Nakhumicha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>Anyango</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Dairy, Food Science &amp;amp; Technology, Egerton University, Egerton-Njoro, Kenya</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Plant, Animal &amp;amp; Food Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science &amp;amp; Technology, Bondo, Kenya</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>734</fpage><lpage>749</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  African emperor moth (
  Gonimbrasia zambesina) caterpillars are considered healthy food as they are rich in protein and unsaturated fats. In Kenya, 
  G. zambesina
   caterpillars are predominantly found along the coastal region
  ,
   where they emerge in during the short and the long rains. The caterpillars forage in the wild on mango (Mangifera indica) leaves and Euclea natalensis (Ericales: Ebenaceae) leaves. The caterpillars are consumed whole or may be transformed into fine flour. The caterpillars’ flour can be utilized in the bakery industry for the enrichment of bakery products since wheat (the major component of bakery products) is low in protein. However, consumers are concerned about the microbiological quality of bakery products enriched with insect flour. There are also concerns about the effect of these insects’ flour on the shelf life of bakery products since they have unsaturated fats. Therefore, this study evaluated the microbial quality and shelf life of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. For all the samples analyzed, total viable count (TVC) was &lt;30 cfu/g, total coliform count (TCC) was &lt;30 cfu/g, Salmonella spp, and Staphylococcus aureus were not detected. The colonies for yeast and moulds were &lt;30 cfu/g throughout the evaluation time of 21 days. The PVs of wheat muffins increased with 
  an 
  increase in the substitution level. The PVs of enriched wheat muffins increased with 
  an 
  increase in storage time and temperature. The
   shelf-life
   of the wheat muffins decreased with an increase in the substitution level of wheat flour with G. zambesina caterpillar flour. The predicted shelf life of 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% wheat muffins was 120.0 days, 111.0 days, 103.0 days, 102.0 days and 90.0 days, respectively. Therefore, wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour have good microbiological quality and shelf life.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Gonimbrasia zambesina&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Domestication</kwd><kwd> Bakery Products</kwd><kwd> Microbial Quality</kwd><kwd> Oxidation</kwd><kwd> Enrichment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The protein malnutrition situation in sub-Saharan Africa and changing food systems are forcing the food sector players to explore various alternative sources of proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref2">2</xref>]. Food industries have shifted their attention to the use of edible insects as a high-quality protein product and a nutrient source for other foods through fortification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref3">3</xref>]. Fortification with insect flour aims to improve the food product’s nutritional value, correct any deficiencies in minerals or vitamins, and enhance its health-protecting substances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref5">5</xref>]. Food fortification with insects has been mostly orchestrated by the new technologies that are currently in use by the food industries, the need for transformation that would ensure proper food management, and the cost of production of insects as raw materials due to their high feed conversion efficiency and the rate of reproduction is high in comparison to other animal sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref6">6</xref>]. Some of the insects that have been used for fortification/enrichment include Rhynchophorus phoenicis larvae, Macrotermes subhylanus, Acheta domesticus, Tenebrio molitor larvae and Nauphoeta cinerea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref10">10</xref>]. Lepidoptera such as G. zambesina caterpillars can also be used for fortification since they are abundant, easy to rear and are high in protein content with more than 50% of their body weight being protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref11">11</xref>]. In coastal Kenya, there is an initiative by the Kipepeo butterfly centre, Gede, Kilifi to train farmers on the domestication of G. zambesina caterpillars to improve production for export and local consumption.</p><p>For successful fortification, the chosen food should be that whose consumption is wide and adequate and have a gap deficit in its nutritional elements that need to be bridged [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref5">5</xref>]. Wheat flour, a major component of bakery products is low in protein with the soft wheat used to make muffins having only 8% - 10% protein content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref12">12</xref>]. Therefore, its protein quality can be improved by enriching with an alternative protein source such as insects flour/powder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref12">12</xref>]. To literature, bakery products such as bread, cookies, biscuits, and wheat buns enriched with some insect powder have been developed to improve their nutritional value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>]. However, the progress already made towards meeting protein security is under threat as there are fears that gains may have been reversed by the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on raw material production and transportation, production cost and consumer accessibility of end products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref1">1</xref>]. Therefore, for the food industry to cope with the current consumer demand for insect-based food products, there should be a much more emphasis on combined approaches for conventional food fortification and food to food fortification by optimal utilization of all the edible insects that are underutilized such as G. zambesina caterpillar larva.</p><p>Fortification of bakery products not only increases their nutritional value but also has got an effect on their microbiological properties and oxidative stability. The consumers and producers are both concerned about the microbiological effects of the addition of insect flour, insect parts, or insect protein into bakery products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref16">16</xref>]. This is because previous studies on the microbiological safety of most edible insects, especially those harvested from the wild, have shown that they harbour microbes of health concerns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref17">17</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref22">22</xref>]. Some insects, such as some edible caterpillars have also been reported to harbour both the pathogenic and spoilage microorganism in their gut [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref24">24</xref>]. Furthermore, wheat muffins are classified as bakery products with a high water activity (a<sub>w</sub>) &gt; 0.85, which often are characterized by spoilage bacteria and yeast and moulds. In some instances, they have also been intimated to the outbreak of foodborne illnesses caused by Salmonella and Bacillus cereus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref25">25</xref>]. The presence of bacteria in bakery products may be due to post-process contamination and poor packaging and storage conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref25">25</xref>]. This is because the high baking temperatures readily destroy vegetative pathogenic microorganisms due to their low thermal resistance (D values), such that they destroy most of the microorganisms in the raw materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref26">26</xref>].</p><p>Bakery products may deteriorate in quality either due to the germination of yeasts and mould spores which can survive the baking temperatures since they have high thermal resistance (D values), food chemical reactions, and enzymatic activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref25">25</xref>]. Yeast and moulds are associated with high sugar foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref27">27</xref>]. When the yeast and moulds grow to levels that are above the acceptable limits for bakery products, the quality of these products is compromised [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref26">26</xref>]. The shelf life of bakery products is also limited by the growth of moulds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref27">27</xref>]. Shelf life is defined as the period in which a food product is satisfactorily safe for consumption and appeals to the senses of consumers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>]. The fortification of bakery products with insect powder which is rich in unsaturated lipids makes them susceptible to lipid oxidation which may lead to the formation of rancidity compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref28">28</xref>]. This, like the yeast and moulds, not only results in the loss of the nutritional value of the bakery products but also affects their shelf life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>Due to the increasing use of insects in enriching bakery products, there is a need to take precautions by determining the microbiological properties of these products such that there is a surety about their safety. To ascertain that no form of microbiological contamination took place during production, bakery industries have got a responsibility to carry out microbiological tests on the insect-based bakery products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>]. Furthermore, there is also a need to determine their oxidative stability due to the addition of unsaturated lipids present in insect ingredients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref30">30</xref>]. The oxidative stability can be determined by monitoring the chemical changes such as oxidative rancidity, caused by the oxidation of fats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref31">31</xref>]. The oxidation of oils results in the formation of primary products, peroxides, which are measured as peroxide values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref31">31</xref>]. The peroxide value can be used to estimate the shelf life either through conventional storage or accelerated shelf life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>]. In performing the conventional storage test, food is stored under conditions that are expected during normal storage for a long time while the accelerated shelf life test is done by storing food products under higher temperatures or oxygen concentrations for some time as tests are frequently performed on selected indicators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref30">30</xref>]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the microbial safety of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour. It also aimed to estimate the shelf life of the wheat muffins based on peroxide accumulation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design and Study Area</title><p>The experiments were arranged in a completely randomized design with 5 treatments of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% substitution levels. Gonimbrasia zambesina caterpillars were domesticated and processed between August and December 2020 at Kipepeo butterfly centre, Gede, Kilifi, Kenya. Batter preparation and baking were done in the food processing laboratory of Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST). Microbiological analysis was done in the microbiology laboratory of JOOUST whereas peroxide value determination was done at the chemistry laboratory of Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology (MMUST). All analyses were done in triplicate. This study was authorized by Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of JOOUST and a research permit by the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI) was obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Raw Material Acquisition and Processing</title><p>Domestication of G. zambesina caterpillars</p><p>Gonimbrasia zambesina caterpillars were reared in two rectangular cages made of steel, wire mesh and net. The cages were 1.2 m long, 1.0 m wide and 0.5 high. Each cage was on four stands, every 0.6 m high. The stands were dipped in ice cream boxes filled with water to prevent predators from accessing the cages. Eggs of G. zambesina moth deposited on mango tree (Mangifera indica) leaves were taken by plucking off gently the leaf. These were transported to the cages where fresh mango leaves were added to protect the eggs from direct sunlight and heavy rains and also act as starter feed for the newly hatched larvae. The doors of the cages were sealed to prevent the hatched larvae from escaping. The eggs of theG. zambesina moth were monitored for hatching at 8:00 am, 12:30 pm, and 4:30 pm daily. The eggs took about 2 - 5 days to hatch. However, hatching was not uniform since, during their collection, the exact time and day of deposition on the leaves were not known. The hatched caterpillars were continuously fed on fresh M. indica leaves. The stalks of consumed mango leaves were removed every morning and evening during routine checking and replaced with fresh ones. Moulting of G. zambesina larvae from the 1<sup>st</sup> instar to the 6<sup>th</sup> instar was at an interval of 4 - 6 days for 3 - 4 weeks depending on the feed consumption rate of each larva and the date on which it was hatched.</p><p>Harvesting of G. zambesina caterpillars</p><p>Mature G. zambesina caterpillars (those that have reached the 6<sup>th</sup> instar stage of larval development) were hand-picked from the cages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Gonimbrasia zambesina caterpillars are regarded as mature if, after continuous feeding for 3 - 4 weeks, they stop feeding and burrow in their manure inside the cage. The harvested caterpillar was weighed and 10% of the harvested populations were released to the environment into ensure continuity in biodiversity.</p><p>Processing of G. zambesina caterpillar</p><p>About 5 kg of the harvested G. zambesina caterpillars were killed by freezing at −25˚C for 30 min and degutted using a scalpel. The caterpillars were washed in running tap water and drip-dried for 20 min on drying nets. They were then transferred into a locally made wooden electric dryer and dried at 55˚C for 3 days to a constant weight. To consider the sample dry, three samplings were done at an interval of one hour which resulted in less than 1% change in weight. The dry caterpillars were milled using a coffee bean grinder (DeLonghi KG-79, Wuhan, China). The G. zambesina caterpillar flour was sieved through a 250 &#181;m sieve to obtain fine flour, packaged and transported to the food processing laboratory of JOOUST in sterilized polyethylene zip-lock bags (Vinayak Udyog, New Delhi, India).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Wheat Muffins Formulation and Baking</title><p>Formulation of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour</p><p>The recipe and the ingredients for the wheat muffins preparation were according to Purnoma et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref12">12</xref>] with slight modifications. Wheat flour was substituted</p><p>with G. zambesina caterpillar flour at 5 levels; 100:0 (the control), 95:5, 90:10, 85:15 and 80:20 w/w. Approximately 150 g of the wheat flour composited with G. zambesina caterpillar flour was weighed into a mixing bowl and mixed using a clean wooden spoon. Melted margarine (98.57 g), water (47.14 g), and whisked eggs (85.71 g) were added into the bowl according to the recipe at an interval of 30 sec, respectively while mixing using a hand mixer (Model: RM/382, Guangdong, China) at high speed (as indicated on the equipment) for 3 min. Baking powder (2.14 g) and refined sugar (91.43 g) were added to the mixing bowls and mixing was done at low speed (as indicated on the hand mixer) for 2 min to form the batter. The muffin batter was poured into the wells of 3 standard 6-well muffin pans. Baking was done in triplicate at 180˚C for 20 min in a preheated forced air circulation oven (Electrolux AR 85, Italy). The baked wheat muffins were then removed from the oven (Electrolux AR 85, Italy) and cooled for 20 min at room temperature. Packaging was done in sterilized polyethylene zip-lock bags (Vinayak Udyog, New Delhi, India), awaiting microbial analysis and peroxide value determination.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Microbiological Analyses</title><p>The microbiological assessment of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour stored at 4˚C was done 48 hr after baking. For total viable count (TVC), total coliform count (TCC), S. aureus determination, and enumeration of yeast and moulds, 5 g of the grounded sample were diluted into 45 mL of sterilized peptone water to make a stock dilution. The dilution was homogenized by vortexing at 3000 rpm for 5 min and serially diluted three fold. Aliquots (1 mL) from each serial dilution were inoculated in triplicate plates.</p><p>TVC</p><p>The total viable count was determined according to AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref32">32</xref>] Method 966.23 in plates with Plate Count Agar (PCA) (CM0152). The plates were incubated at 35˚C for 48 hr. The results were expressed as cfu/g of the sample.</p><p>TCC</p><p>The total coliform count was determined according to AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref32">32</xref>] Method 966.24 in plates with MacConkey Agar (MA) (Himedia Ref M043). The plates were inverted and incubated at 35˚C for 48 hr. The results were expressed as cfu/g of the sample.</p><p>Staphylococcus aureus</p><p>Staphylococcus aureus counts were determined according to Nyangena et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref17">17</xref>] in petri dishes with Baird-Parker medium (Himedia Ref M043) enriched with egg-yolk tellurite emulsion (Himedia, India). The plates were incubated at 35˚C for 48 hr. Colonies of typical S. aureus appearance (grey-black to jet black, circular, smooth, convex, and moist and 2 - 3 mm in diameter) were monitored for growth.</p><p>Detection ofSalmonella</p><p>Detection of Salmonella spp was according to Nyangena et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref17">17</xref>]. Briefly, 25 g of ground sample was diluted into 225 mL of nutrient broth (Himedia Ref M002) in a closable container, gently shaken, and incubated at 35˚C for 24 hr. Then, 25 mL of the enriched homogenate was transferred to 225 mL of tetrathionate broth (Himedia, India) and incubated at 37˚C for 24 hr. A 3mm loopful of incubated culture was streaked in triplicate plates on Salmonella-Shigella Agar (Himedia, India). Plates were incubated at 37˚C for 24 hr and observed for the typical salmonella colonies (colourless colonies with black centers).</p><p>Enumeration of yeast and moulds</p><p>Total yeast and moulds counts were enumerated according to Nyangena et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref17">17</xref>] on days 1, 7, 14, and 21 of baking in plates with Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (Himedia Ref M096) acidified with 10% tartaric Acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany) to pH 3.5 using a sterile micropipette. The aliquot was spread over the media using a sterile spreader until it was absorbed into the media. The plates were incubated at 25˚C for 72 hr. Plates with between 30 - 300 colonies were selected and the colonies were counted. The results were expressed as cfu/g of the sample.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Peroxide Value (PV) and Shelf Life Estimation</title><p>Peroxide value was determined according to AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref32">32</xref>] Method 965.33 for triplicate samples stored at 25˚C, 37˚C, and 45˚C over 21 days. Briefly, 0.3 g of oil extracted from the enriched wheat muffins through the Soxhlet extraction method according to AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref32">32</xref>] Method 920.39 was weighed into a 250 mL stoppered Erlenmeyer flask, and 30 mL of acetic acid chloroform solvent mixture was added and swirled to dissolve. Saturated potassium iodide solution (0.5 mL) was added using a mohr pipet, left to stand in the dark for 1 min with occasional shaking and then 30 mL of distilled water was added. The solution was titrated against 0.01M sodium thiosulfate with vigorous shaking until the yellow colour almost disappeared. Then, 0.5 mL 1% starch solution was added and titration continued with vigorously shaking until the blue colour disappeared. The peroxide value was calculated as follows:</p><p>P V 1 [ meq   O 2 / kg ] = T &#215; M &#215; 100 W (1)</p><p>where: P V 1 is peroxide value expressed in meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg, M is the molarity of sodium thiosulfate solution consumed in mol/L, T is the titer of the sodium thiosulfate solution, W is weighed portion of substance in grams.</p><p>Data processing</p><p>A regression plot of a semi-logarithmic scale was established for the rate constant for each sample at the three temperatures (Lnk) against the absolute inverse of temperature ( 1 T ) to obtain an Arrhenius equation based on:</p><p>ln k = ln k o − E a R ( 1 T ) (2)</p><p>1 T = 1 T * − 1 T r e f (3)</p><p>where: k is the reaction rate constant; R is the molar gas constant (8.314 J/K/mol), T is the absolute temperature (K); E a is the apparent activation energy (J/mol), and k o is the pre-exponential factor; T r e f is corresponding to the average of the temperature range used during the experiment where in this case was taken to be 37˚C (310.15 K) and T * is the temperature to which prediction of shelf life is done, in this case, it was 22˚C (295.15 K).</p><p>First-order regression models for wheat muffin enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour at each substitution level at 25˚C, 37˚C, and 45˚C temperatures as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The Arrhenius parameters were obtained to estimate the shelf life according to a formula described by the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref33">33</xref>]:</p><p>Shelf-life = [ A lim ] − [ A o ] K r e f exp [ − E a R ( 1 T * − 1 T r e f ) ] (4)</p><p>where: A o is the initial peroxide value at time zero; K r e f is the rate constant at the reference temperature; E a is the apparent activation energy (J/mol); T * is the temperature to which prediction of shelf life is done, in this case, it was 22˚C (295.15 K); A lim is the standard acceptable limit for peroxide value in processed foods which is 10.0 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil according to East African Standard (EAS 795:2013); T r e f is corresponding to the average of the temperature range used during the experiment where in this case was taken to be 37˚C (310.15 K).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> First order regression models for the wheat muffins enriched withG. zambesina caterpillar flour at 25˚C, 37˚C, and 45˚C storage temperatures</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Substitution level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Regression equation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2 </sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0347x + 0.0749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9295</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0388x + 0.0731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9465</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0426x + 0.1219</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8984</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0311x + 0.1089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8476</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.032x + 0.1365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7929</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0431x + 0.1824</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8025</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0332x + 0.0913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9018</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0378x + 0.0774</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9453</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0471x + 0.087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9552</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >15%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0269x + 0.064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9277</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0327x + 0.0872</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9021</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0389x + 0.1363</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8497</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >20%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0266x + 0.0659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9094</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0337x + 0.0477</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9685</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 0.0441x + 0.094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9416</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Key: y is the peroxide value and x is the temperature.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed using SAS<sup>&#174;</sup> software version 8.3. Normality of microbiological and shelf life data was tested using PROC UNIVARIATE and homogeneity was tested using Levene’s method. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out using PROC GLM to test the hypotheses of the study at a 95% confidence level. Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) method was used in the separation of the means at p ≤ 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The TVC and TCC of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour were &lt;30 cfu/g for all samples (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella were not detected in all the samples analysed. Yeast and moulds counts were low (&lt;30 cfu/g) in wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour for days 1, 7, 14, and 21 of evaluation. Edible caterpillars have been found to harbour pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref24">24</xref>]. Therefore, they are of public health concern more so in the utilization of their flour in the bakery industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref23">23</xref>]. However, the utilization of G. zambesina caterpillars’ flour for the enrichment of wheat muffins during processing was observed to produce microbiologically safe wheat muffins for human consumption. This might be attributed to the domestication of the caterpillars which may have modulated the source to new microorganisms and the intrinsic ones in G. zambesina caterpillars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref15">15</xref>]. The results of this study corroborate with those by Ayensu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref7">7</xref>] in their research on the nutritional composition and acceptability of biscuits fortified with R. phoenicis larvae and orange-fleshed sweet potato in pregnant women.</p><p>The total viable counts were below the maximum permissible limits for edible foods (&lt;10<sup>5</sup> CFU/g) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref26">26</xref>]. This might be ascribed to good handling practices of the muffins post baking and proper packaging in sterile polyethylene zip-lock bags (Vinayak Udyog, New Delhi, India) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref25">25</xref>]. The absence of coliforms, S. aureus, and Salmonella in wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour might be attributed to the dehulling of wheat during wheat flour (major component of the muffins) processing that concentrates 90% of microorganisms</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Microbiological quality of G. zambesina caterpillar flour enriched wheat muffins</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Level of Substitution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TVC (cfu/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TCC (cfu/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Staphylococcus aureus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salmonella spp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >YM cfu/g</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not detected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Key: TVC = Total viable count; TCC = Total coliform count; YM = Yeasts and moulds.</p><p>on the bran which is then separated from the germ and pollard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref35">35</xref>] Coliforms are indicator organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref36">36</xref>]. Their absence in wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour is an indication that good handling and manufacturing practices were adhered to during the processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref36">36</xref>]. The absence of coliforms might further be attributed to proper packaging which was done in sterilized polyethylene zip lock bags (Vinayak Udyog, New Delhi, India). Most coliform contaminations in bakery products occur due to poor post-process handling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref26">26</xref>]. The absence of S. aureus and Salmonella in all the analysed samples might be attributed to good handling and manufacturing practices. Salmonella spp is commonly found in the egg content, which was used as an ingredient in the enriched wheat muffins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref26">26</xref>]. The absence might be ascribed to the fact that Salmonella is a member of enterobacteriaceae family, hence very sensitive to heat. The high baking temperature for the enriched wheat muffins might have killed the Salmonella cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref37">37</xref>]. It can further be attributed to degutting and rinsing of the G. zambesina caterpillars which might have reduced the gut microorganism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref38">38</xref>]. For food to meet the microbiological guidelines on safety, there should be no detection of Salmonella in 25 g of the sample tested [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>At 21 days of storage, the yeast and moulds counts were lower than 30 cfu/g in all the wheat muffins samples. This was way below the maximum acceptable limit for yeast and moulds in foods (1000 cfu/g) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref39">39</xref>]. Yeast and moulds are associated with high sugar foods such as wheat muffins which are often responsible for their spoilage thereby limiting their shelf life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref39">39</xref>]. Therefore, based on the findings of this study, wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour are safe microbiologically safe for human consumption over a storage period of 21 days.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the initial PVs for wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% substitution levels were 4.50 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg, 5.00 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg, 4.67 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg, 5.50 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg, 5.34 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg, respectively. The PV increased with an increase in storage temperature and time for all the wheat muffin oil samples. The control wheat muffins recorded lower PV compared to those enriched withG. zambesina caterpillar flour at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% substitution levels.</p><p>The initial PVs of all the oils of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour was higher than that of fresh amaranth seed oil (0.487 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil) and that of fresh coconut oil (0.24 to 0.49 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>]. This discrepancy in the initial PVs of these oils might be attributed to the primary oxidation of lipids that might have started immediately after the wheat muffins’ processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>]. During cooling, the enriched wheat muffins were exposed to atmospheric oxygen. Exposure of lipids to oxygen (depending on concentrations) enhances oxidation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref40">40</xref>]. Furthermore, the addition of sodium bicarbonate (metal ion) to the wheat muffins as a chemical leavener might have also played a role in their initial PVs. Such metal ions act as a catalyst in an oxidative reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref40">40</xref>]. The PVs can also be further ascribed to the high baking temperatures (180˚C).</p><p>There exist a linear relationship between temperature and the rate of oxidation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref40">40</xref>].</p><p>Based on the initial PVs, wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour can be classified to be at a low oxidative state or the moderate oxidative state. This however changed with storage time as the PVs increased. Conventionally, food products are classified into three oxidative states based on their PVs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref41">41</xref>]. A food product is classified as a low oxidative state when it has a PV of between 1 and 5 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil, a moderate oxidative state when the PV is between 5 and 10 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil, and a high oxidative state if the PV is above 10 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref41">41</xref>]. The oxidative level of oils is reflected in the number of hydro peroxides in it which ultimately informs the tendency of an oil to become rancid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref41">41</xref>]. A food product with a PV of between 20 to 40 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil exhibits noticeable acidity and rancid taste [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>The increase in the PVs of G. zambesina caterpillar flour enriched wheat muffins with an increase in storage temperatures might be ascribed to the linear relationship between temperature and the rate of fat oxidation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref40">40</xref>]. Exposure of lipids to higher temperatures enhances the rate of lipid oxidation, while at lower temperatures, the rate of lipid oxidation is slow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref29">29</xref>]. The higher PVs for the enriched wheat muffins reported on test day 21 might be attributed to the fact that as lipid oxidation takes place over a period of time, there is a buildup of the hydro peroxides in the food product which leads to deterioration in quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref40">40</xref>]. The higher PVs for the wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour at higher substitution levels were expected since edible caterpillars flour is rich in unsaturated fatty acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref42">42</xref>]. Unsaturated fatty acids are broken down by oxygen through an autolytic free radical mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref41">41</xref>]. Higher substitution levels of wheat flour with G. zambesina caterpillar flour translated to higher quantities of unsaturated fatty acids added to the enriched wheat muffins. At 25˚C storage temperature, the highest PV was 9.83 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil. According to the East African Standard, the PV limit for refined oil is 10 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil (EAS 795:2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref14">14</xref>]. However, the PV limit for refined oil according to Codex Alimentarius is 15 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref41">41</xref>].</p><p>There was a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) in the predicted shelf life of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The control wheat muffins had a shelf life of 120.0 days. Wheat muffins with 20% G. zambesina caterpillar flour had shorter shelf life (90 days). Generally, the shelf life of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour is reduced with an increase in substitution levels. To predict the shelf life of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour, the quality reference estimation for a maximum PV was taken to be 10 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg. The longer shelf life reported for the reference wheat muffins might be attributed to the low quantities of unsaturated fatty acid in G. zambesina caterpillar flour used in substituting wheat flour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119307-ref42">42</xref>]. The short shelf life of 20% wheat muffins is ascribed to high amounts of unsaturated fatty acids oxidized at a 20% substitution level. Based on the findings of this study that there was no significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) in shelf life among 0%, 5%, and 10% G. zambesina enriched wheat muffins, the bakery industry can embrace the utilization of the G. zambesina caterpillar flour to enrich bakery products.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Predicted shelf life of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Substitution level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arrhenius equation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shelf-life (days)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = −962.37x − 3.2398</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9934</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.0<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = −1424.0x − 3.3292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.0<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = −1597.3x − 3.2195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.0<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = −1726.7x − 3.3996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9903</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.0<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = −2344.2x − 3.3414</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0<sup>b</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Values with the same letter along the column are not significantly different at p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion and Recommendation</title><p>Wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour are microbiologically safe for human consumption. Adhering to good handling and manufacturing effectively controls the growth of yeast and moulds which are the major cause of spoilage in bakery products with a high and intermediate water activity (a<sub>w</sub>). The PV of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour at room temperature (25˚C) is below the East African Standard for PV limit (10 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg oil). Wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour generally have a shelf life between 120.0 days to 90.0 days due to their good microbiological quality and PVs. This study recommends that further tests, e.g. moisture content, free fatty acidity, and para-Anisidine value (p-AV) should be conducted to the determination of the shelf life of wheat muffins enriched with G. zambesina caterpillar flour.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology through the Africa Centre of Excellence for sustainable use of insects as food and feed (INSEFOODS).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Opondo, F., Nakhumicha, A. and Anyango, J. (2022) Microbiological Assessment and Shelf-Life Determination of Wheat Muffins Enriched with Domesticated African Emperor Moth (Gonimbrasia zambesina Walker) Caterpillar Flour. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 13, 734-749. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2022.138053</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119307-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNICEF (2020) In Brief to the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gillespie, S. and van den Bold, M. (2017) Agriculture, Food Systems, and Nutrition: Meeting the Challenge. Global Challenges, 1, Article ID: 1600002. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Carvalho, N.M., Madureira, A.R. and Pintado, M.E. (2020) The Potential of Insects as Food Sources—A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60, 3642-3652. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1703170</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agrahar-Murugkar, D. (2020) Food to Food Fortification of Breads and Biscuits with Herbs, Spices, Millets and Oilseeds on Bio-Accessibility of Calcium, Iron and Zinc and Impact of Proteins, Fat and Phenolics. LWT, 130, Article ID: 109703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109703</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zielińska, E., Pankiewicz, U. and Sujka, M. (2021) Nutritional, Physiochemical, and Biological Value of Muffins Enriched with Edible Insects Flour. Antioxidants, 10, 1122. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cappelli, A., Oliva, N., Bonaccorsi, G., Lorini, C. and Cini, E. (2020) Assessment of the Rheological Properties and Bread Characteristics Obtained by Innovative Protein Sources (Cicer arietinum, Acheta domesticus, Tenebrio molitor): Novel Food or Potential Improvers for Wheat Flour? LWT, 118, Article ID: 108867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108867</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayensu, J., Lutterodt, H., Annan, R.A., Edusei, A. and Loh, S.P. (2019) Nutritional Composition and Acceptability of Biscuits Fortified with Palm Weevil Larvae (Rhynchophorus phoenicis Fabricius) and Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato among Pregnant Women. Food Science &amp; Nutrition, 7, 1807-1815. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kinyuru, J.N., Kenji, G.M. and Njoroge, M.S. (2009) Process Development, Nutrition and Sensory Qualities of Wheat Buns Enriched with Edible Termites (Macrotermes subhylanus) from Lake Victoria Region, Kenya. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 9, 1739-1750. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajfand.v9i8.48411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osimani, A., Milanovic, V., Cardinali, F., Roncolini, A., Garofalo, C., Clementi, F., Aquilanti, L., et al. (2018) Bread Enriched with Cricket Powder (Acheta domesticus): A Technological, Microbiological and Nutritional Evaluation. Innovative Food Science &amp; Emerging Technologies, 48, 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Oliveira, L.M., da Silva Lucas, A.J., Cadaval, C.L. and Mellado, M.S. (2017) Bread Enriched with Flour from Cinereous Cockroach (Nauphoeta cinerea). Innovative Food Science &amp; Emerging Technologies, 44, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.08.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Subramanian, S., Tanga, C.M., Kusia, E., Cerretti, P., Khamis, F., Copeland, R.S., Ekesi, S., et al. (2017) Poster 10: Diversity of Edible Saturniids (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) and Their Parasitoids in Kenya. Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, Langkawi, 11-15 September 2017, 260. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786394118.0260</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Purnomo, E.H., Sitanggang, A.B., Agustin, D.S., Hariyadi, P. and Hartono, S. (2012) Formulation and Process Optimization of Muffin Produced from Composite Flour of Corn, Wheat and Sweet Potato [Formulasi dan Optimasi Proses Produksi Mufin dari Tepung Komposit Jagung, Gandum dan Ubi Jalar]. Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan, 23, 165-165. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2012.23.2.165</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bawa, M., Songsermpong, S., Kaewtapee, C. and Chanput, W. (2020) Nutritional, Sensory, and Texture Quality of Bread and Cookie Enriched with House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Powder. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 44, e14601. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gichau, A.W,, Okoth, J.K., Makokha, A. and Wanjala, G.W. (2019) Use of Peroxide Value and Moisture Content as a Measure of Quality for Amaranth-Sorghum Grains Based Complementary Food. Nutrition and Food Technology, 5, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.16966/2470-6086.162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van der Fels-Klerx, H.J., Camenzuli, L., Belluco, S., Meijer, N. and Ricci, A. (2018) Food Safety Issues Related to Uses of Insects for Feeds and Foods. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 17, 1172-1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12385</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belluco, S., Losasso, C., Maggioletti, M., Alonzi, C.C., Paoletti, M.G. and Ricci, A. (2013) Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 12, 296-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nyangena, D.N., Mutungi, C., Imathiu, S., Kinyuru, J., Affognon, H., Ekesi, S., Fiaboe, K.K., et al. (2020) Effects of Traditional processing Techniques on the Nutritional and Microbiological Quality of Four Edible Insect Species Used for Food and Feed in East Africa. Foods, 9, 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050574</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amadi, E.N. and Kiin-Kabari, D.B. (2016) Nutritional Composition and Microbiology of Some Edible Insects Commonly Eaten in Africa, Hurdles and Future Prospects: A Critical Review. Journal of Food: Microbiology, Safety &amp; Hygiene, 1, Article ID: 1000107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Govorushko, S. (2019) Global Status of Insects as Food and Feed Source: A Review. Trends in Food Science &amp; Technology, 91, 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rumpold, B.A. and Schlüter, O.K. (2013) Potential and Challenges of Insects as an Innovative Source for Food and Feed Production. Innovative Food Science &amp; Emerging Technologies, 17, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ng’ang’a, J., Imathiu, S., Fombong, F., Ayieko, M., Vanden Broeck, J. and Kinyuru, J. (2019) Microbial Quality of Edible Grasshoppers Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): From Wild Harvesting to Fork in the Kagera Region, Tanzania. Journal of Food Safety, 39, e12549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12549</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Messina, C.M., Gaglio, R., Morghese, M., Tolone, M., Arena, R., Moschetti, G., Settanni, L., et al. (2019) Microbiological Profile and Bioactive Properties of Insect Powders Used in Food and Feed Formulations. Foods, 8, 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8090400</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kelemu, S., Niassy, S., Torto, B., Fiaboe, K., Affognon, H., Tonnang, H., Ekesi, S., et al. (2015) African Edible Insects for Food and Feed: Inventory, Diversity, Commonalities and Contribution to Food Security. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 1, 103-119. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2014.0016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mutungi, C., Irungu, F.G., Nduko, J., Mutua, F., Affognon, H., Nakimbugwe, D., Fiaboe, K.K.M., et al. (2019) Postharvest Processes of Edible Insects in Africa: A Review of Processing Methods, and the Implications for Nutrition, Safety and New Products Development. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59, 276-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1365330</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, J.P., Daifas, D.P., El-Khoury, W., Koukoutsis, J. and El-Khoury, A. (2004) Shelf Life and Safety Concerns of Bakery Products—A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 44, 19-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690490263774</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, K.K., Sarkar, A. and Hossain, A. (2020) Isolation of Pathogenic Microorganisms and Determination of Their Antibiotic Resistance Patterns Collected from Different Bakery Products of Dhaka City. Food Research, 4, 1312-1316. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.4(4).400</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saeed, I., Shaheen, S., Hussain, K., Khan, M.A., Jaffer, M., Mahmood, T., Khan, F., et al. (2019) Assessment of Mold and Yeast in Some Bakery Products of Lahore, Pakistan Based on LM and SEM. Microscopy Research and Technique, 82, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kontio, V. (2017) Fatty Acid Composition and Shelf Life of Cricket Flour.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farhoosh, R. and Hoseini-Yazdi, S.Z. (2013) Shelf-Life Prediction of Olive Oils Using Empirical Models Developed at Low and High Temperatures. Food Chemistry, 141, 557-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prchalová, J., Cìzkova, H., Sevcik, R., Hanusova, K. and Rajchl, A. (2016) Evaluation of Shelf-Life of Fruit Baby Food. Agronomy Research, 14, 556-568.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ajith, S., Pramod, S., Prabha Kumari, C. and Potty, V.P. (2015) Effect of Storage Temperatures and Humidity on Proximate Composition, Peroxide Value and Iodine Value of Raw Cashew Nuts. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52, 4631-4636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1476-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis. 18th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manzocco, L., Panozzo, A. and Calligaris, S. (2012) Accelerated Shelf Life Testing (ASLT) of Oils by Light and Temperature Exploitation. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 89, 577-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-011-1958-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntuli, V., Mekbib, S.B., Asita, A.O., Molebatsi, N., Makotoko, M. and Chatanga, P. (2013) Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Maize and Wheat Flour from a Milling Company, Lesotho.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sperber, W.H. and North American Millers’ Association Microbiology Working Group (2007) Role of Microbiological Guidelines in the Production and Commercial Use of Milled Cereal Grains: A Practical Approach for the 21st Century. Journal of Food Protection, 70, 1041-1053. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, N.H., Trmcic, A., Hsieh, T.H., Boor, K.J. and Wiedmann, M. (2016) The Evolving Role of Coliforms as Indicators of Unhygienic Processing Conditions in Dairy Foods. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article No. 1549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01549</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Debonne, E., Van Bockstaele, F., Van Driessche, M., De Leyn, I., Eeckhout, M. and Devlieghere, F. (2018) Impact of Par-Baking and Packaging on the Microbial Quality of Par-Baked Wheat and Sourdough Bread. Food Control, 91, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.03.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kourimská, L. and Adámková, A. (2016) Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Edible Insects. NFS Journal, 4, 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Durovic, V., Radovanovic, M., Mandic, L., Knezevic, D., Zornic, V. and Dukic, D. (2021) Chemical and Microbial Evaluation of Biscuits Made from Wheat Flour Substituted with Wheat Sprouts. Food Science and Technology International, 27, 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013220942441</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Flick Jr., G.J., Hong, G.P. and Knobl, G.M. (1992) Lipid Oxidation of Seafood during Storage. In: St. Angelo, A.J., Ed., Lipid Oxidation in Food, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1992-0500.ch011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moigradean, D., Poiana, M.A. and Gogoasa, I. (2012) Quality Characteristics and Oxidative Stability of Coconut Oil during Storage. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, 18, 272-276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119307-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Huis, A. (2015) Edible Insects Contributing to Food Security? Agriculture &amp; Food Security, 4, Article No. 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-015-0041-5</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>