<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1109092</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-119251</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Workplace Accidents: Types, Frequencies, and Costs. Case of Workers Subject to the National Social Security Fund of Haut Katanga I, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jacques</surname><given-names>Camille Musolo Kwambamba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Makali Ntamwenge</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Néné</surname><given-names>Moma Kasongo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Blandine</surname><given-names>Ngalula Mubadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antoine</surname><given-names>Kasongo Nyandwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Balthas</surname><given-names>Kabeya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kabyla</surname><given-names>Ilunga Benjamin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Simon</surname><given-names>Ilunga Kandolo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hendrick</surname><given-names>Mbutshu Lukuke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Tshamilemba Reference Health Center, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>National HIV/AIDS Control Program, Kolwezi, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Occupational Medicine Research Unit, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Health Promotion and Communication Unit, School of Public Health, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Katanga I Provincial Directorate, National Social Security Fund, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Pediatrics Department, Sendwe Provincial Referral General Hospital, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Workplace accidents represent a real public health problem, although they are usually under-reported. 
  Methodology: We conducted a cross sectional survey aiming to contribute to the fight against occupational accidents in the province of Katanga in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. COVID-19 in the university residences of Lubumbashi. The data was encoded in Excel and exported to SPSS version 23 (SPSS, Armonk, NY) for analysis purposes. 
  Results: Our results revealed that most of the victims were of medical sex (94.9%) and those whose age is between 26 to 50 years old were the majority (52.3%) working in the mining sector (54%). Partial disability was the most encountered (degree between 10% and 25%) in 85.1% of cases. We observed that there is a statistically significant difference between repair costs and outcome (P = 0.000). Thus, death costs more than amputation, healing, and sequelae (P = 0.00). 
  Conclusion: Accidents at work must be taken seriously and their notification obligatory. Safety and hygiene at work are major assets in reducing or even eradicating occupational risks.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Work Accident</kwd><kwd> Types</kwd><kwd> Frequency</kwd><kwd> Costs</kwd><kwd> National Social Security Fund</kwd><kwd> Provincial Directorate Katanga I</kwd><kwd> Democratic Republic of the Congo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The protection of workers against occupational risks is one of the objectives of the International Labor Organization because safety and health at work are not only essential for decent work but also constitute an important factor in economic growth, productivity and development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref1">1</xref>]. The International Labor Office estimates that the risks of poor health at work are higher in developing countries, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and in newly industrialized countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Accidents at work and occupational diseases are two occupational risks covered by two separate legislations, although the compensation of victims is based in both cases on similar principles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref3">3</xref>]. Occupational risks have for too long been underestimated as determinants of public health, yet occupational diseases are numerous and weigh heavily on the health of populations: cancers, hearing disorders, respiratory diseases, joint diseases and musculoskeletal disorders, psychological and depressive disorders, dermatological and allergic disorders, occupational asthma and rhinitis, cardiovascular diseases, reproductive disorders, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Most of the time, with rare exceptions, the professional origin of these pathologies does not confer any specificity on them; they affect all the apparatuses and both the somatic and psychic spheres. The risk factors for these disorders are themselves very numerous and varied in nature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>The classic chemical nuisances number in the tens of thousands and are present in many sectors of activity. Physical factors such as noise, cold or hot work, vibrations, radiation are extremely widespread. Biological agents are found in particular in health care settings or in the food and cleaning sectors and affect a large number of workers. There are still many physical and postural constraints: carrying heavy loads, working in uncomfortable and painful positions, repetitive movements. All in all, occupational risks do not concern one pathology or determinant but an immense world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Workers in industries spend at least a third of the day at work which have a significant effect on their health and safety due to occupational and work-related injuries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref5">5</xref>]. These occupational hazards constitute a major public health and development problem with serious health, social and economic consequences for workers and their employers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>According to new estimates, more than 2.3 million people die each year due to fatal occupational accidents or work-related illnesses. This data means that every day around 7000 people die from these causes. In addition, more than 960,000 workers are injured on the job daily [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref8">8</xref>]. Over 90% of occupational hazards were in low- and middle-income countries, where the greatest concentration of the global workforce and low-level factories were found [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref3">3</xref>]. This problem is costing the world a loss of about 4% of gross national product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref10">10</xref>]. Despite this, only 5% - 10% of the working population in developing countries has access to some kind of occupational health and safety services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>In Lubumbashi, MBUTSHU in its cross-sectional study conducted to determine the incidence of musculoskeletal disorders of the hands and arms in Congolese cassava and maize millers exposed to vibration over the 12 months, noted that the overall incidence of musculoskeletal disorders of hand-arm was 25.8% among millers (compared to 5.2% among civilian workers; P &lt; 0.001). The risk of developing musculoskeletal symptoms was seven times higher among suckers. Smoking, a number of cigarettes and daily exposure time were positively correlated with musculoskeletal disorders in millers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Occupational accidents and work-related diseases cause high suffering and loss for individuals, organizations, communities and society. Work-related hazards are a significant problem worldwide and are particularly serious in developing countries. The total number of fatal accidents and fatal accident incidence rates has decreased over the last 10 years worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref13">13</xref>]. The risks compensated by social security are financed on the basis of revenue from contributions. The amount of these contributions is also fixed by the actuarial calculation but the compensation goes through a mechanism of horizontal redistribution: from the active to the unemployed, from the healthy to the sick, from people of working age to retirees, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref14">14</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>Our study was conducted at the national social security fund of the Katanga Provincial Directorate.</p><p>We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive retrospective study based on the documentary search of the archives of the national social security fund (Model sheets A1, A2, A3, A4, registers and accounting documents) covering all the files of declared work accidents. and treated with the services (Direction Katanga I) of the national social security fund located in Lubumbashi in the province of Haut-Katanga, over the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020.</p><p>The Provincial Directorate of the National Social Security Fund covers the city of Lubumbashi and the territory of Kipushi.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Population and Sampling</title><p>As part of our study, workers affiliated with the Provincial Directorate of CNSS Katanga I constitute our study population. Our sampling was exhaustive and its size is made up of 195 victims of professional risk declared and treated and deemed admissible at the Provincial Directorate of the CNSS Haut Katanga I during the period of our study, i.e., from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019. Note that no case of occupational disease was declared during our study period.</p><p>All workers affiliated to the Provincial Directorate of the National Social Security Fund Katanga I and victims of occupational risks declared during the period from 01/01 2010 to 31/12/2019 were included in the study.</p><p>While all workers affiliated to the CNSS Katanga I Provincial Directorate and victims of occupational hazards during a study period other than ours, as well as all workers who are victims of occupational hazards but are not affiliated or of undeclared occupational hazards or those whose files were deemed inadmissible to the Provincial Directorate the national social security fund Katanga I will be excluded from our study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Collection</title><p>A collection sheet was developed for the occasion and served as a statistical data collection tool. These data come from the registration files.</p><p>We will use documents from the occupational risk department (Model sheets A1, A2, A3, and A4 in the appendix), registers of declarations of accidents at work and accounting documents for the payment of medical care and pensions.</p><p>In terms of input and encoding, the Excel 2013 software will serve as our tool. This software will also allow us to design our two data entry masks.</p><p>Once encoded, the databases were exported to SPSS version 23 (SPSS, Armonk, NY) and to EPI info version 7.1.0.6 of 08/09/2012 for analysis purposes.</p><p>The average Congolese Franc exchange rate set by the Central Bank of Congo was used for each year.</p><p>The GDP/capita considered is that of 2018 which is $496/capita [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>In 95% of cases, the victims of accidents at work were in the majority represented (95%).</p><p>Victims aged between 26 and 50 were in the majority (51.3%) against those aged under 18 and those aged between 18 and 25 with all 1.5% of cases. Married victims represent 74.4% of cases followed by singles (24.6%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Victims working in the mining sectors were in the majority (54.4%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Partial disability was the most encountered (degree between 10% and 25%) in 85.1% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Sequelae were the most encountered after work accidents (43.1%), followed by recovery (29.7%), death (16.9%) and amputation (10.3%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The year 2010 cost more than the others (24.6% of the cost), followed by the years 2011, 2013, 2012 and 2014 with respectively 19.5%; 17.9%, 15.9% and 11.3%.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows that the year 2010 recorded more accidents than the other years (24.6%), followed by the year 2011 with 19.5% against the year 2019 which only experienced 0.5% of work accident cases.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (Age)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 to 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 to 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 to 65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> indicates that deaths had a higher total cost (56.7%) than the others versus amputations (5.4%).</p><p>We observed that there is a statistically significant difference between repair costs and outcome (P = 0.000) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>We find that death costs more than amputation, healing, and sequelae (P = 0.00) while sequelae cost more than healing, but this difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.164).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of victims according to degree of disability</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Degree of disability</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partial disability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total disability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Breakdown of workplace accidents by years of study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of costs by outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Outcome</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average cost ($)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum cost</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum cost</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total cost (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amputation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >837.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1114.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4841.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16746.0 (5.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5367.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3816.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13512.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177137.4 (56.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >334.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >648.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3759.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19377.9 (6.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sequels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1183.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2201.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11912.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99393.0 (31.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >312654.3574</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between the costs of treatment and the outcome of accidents at work (Anova test)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total cost of treatment in dollars</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >sum of squares</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ddl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >medium square</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inter-groups</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >587644929.173</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195881643.058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.852</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intragroups</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >915830311.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4794923.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1503475240.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Statistics in terms of work accidents show that about 2000 deaths per year are work-related and the rate of work accidents involving more than 3 days lost is 47.8 per 100,000 workers. This rate is equivalent to 250% of the average rate for the North Africa and Middle East region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows us that in 95% of cases, male victims of work accidents were predominantly represented (95%). Victims aged between 26 and 50 were in the majority (51.3%) against those aged under 18 and those aged between 18 and 25 with all 1.5% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). For WIN, in Brunei Darussalam, accidents were more frequent among men (98%), and migrant workers (86%), in the 30 - 39 age group (42.5%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref17">17</xref>]. In Brazil, the prevalence of work accidents was 2.79% and the majority of victims were between 18 and 24 years old [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>MENEGON found that victims aged between 40 and 49 were in the majority (6.7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>Regarding marital status, married victims represent 74.4% of cases, followed by single people (24.6%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Accidents at work were single [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>Victims working in the mining sectors were in the majority (54.4%) versus those working in manufacturing (13.6%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). On the other hand, in Brazil, the economic activity with the highest prevalence of accidents was the manufacturing industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> indicates that partial disability was the most encountered (degree between 10% and 25%) in 85.1% of cases. On the other hand, permanent disability was frequent in both Spain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref22">22</xref>] and Brazil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>The sequelae were the most encountered after accidents at work (43.1%), followed by recovery (29.7%), death (16.9%) and amputation (10.3%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Our results are similar to those of Spain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows that the year 2010 had more work accidents than the other years (24.6%), followed by the years 2011, 2013, 2012 and 2014 with respectively 19.5%; 17.9%, 15.9% and 11.3%. This situation could be explained by the mining boom experienced by Greater Katanga (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The curve is certainly experiencing a drop while noting that the years 2018 and 2019 had the lowest costs (1.5% and 0.5%).</p><p>The results of an Iranian study are similar to ours because in a retrospective study covering 10 years, from 2007 to 2016, the rates of work accidents were very high in the first five years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119251-ref24">24</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between the costs of amputation, death and healing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Outcome</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean difference</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Standard error</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% confidence interval</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower bound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper bound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Amputation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4530.4998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >620.5214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6280.729</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2780.270</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >503.2003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >567.8180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.853</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1098.375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2104.775</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sequels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−345.9481</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >544.8198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.939</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1882.655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1190.759</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5033.7000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >477.4639</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3686.976</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6380.424</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sequels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4184.5516</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >449.8701</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2915.658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5453.446</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sequels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−849.1484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373.8362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1903.583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205.286</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>We observed that there is a statistically significant difference between repair costs and outcome (P = 0.000), as shown in Tables 4-6. Thus, death costs more than amputation healing as well as sequelae (P = 0.00) while sequelae cost more than recovery but this difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.164).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>We conducted a cross-sectional study on the occupational risks recorded at the Directorate of the national social security fund of the province of Katanga I: Our study covered the period from 01/01/2010 to 01/31/2019, i.e., ten (10) years.</p><p>The sequelae were the most encountered after accidents at work (43.1%), followed by recovery (29.7%), death (16.9%) and amputation (10.3%). The year 2010 saw the cost of care higher than the other years (24.6%). No cases of the occupational disease were reported. There were more work accidents occurring in the workplace (70%) than those occurring while commuting (30%).</p><p>It is important that the employer declares any social risk within the time limit for holistic care.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kwambamba, J.C.M., Ntamwenge, C.M., Kasongo, N.M., Mubadi, B.N., Nyandwe, A.K., Kabeya, B., Benjamin, K.I., Kandolo, S.I. and Lukuke, H.M. (2022) Workplace Accidents: Types, Frequencies, and Costs. Case of Workers Subject to the National Social Security Fund of Haut Katanga I, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Open Access Li- brary Journal, 9: e9092. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109092</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119251-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OIT (2019) La sécurité et la santé au c&amp;oelig;ur de l’avenir du travail.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitronza, P.L. (2014) Identification des risques professionnels dans l’industrie textile en République Démocratique du Congo. The Pan African Medical Journal, 19, Article No. 373.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aderaw, Z., Engdaw, D. and Tadesse, T. (2011) Determinants of Occupational Injury: A Case Control Study among Textile Factory Workers in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2011, Article ID: 657275.  
https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/657275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Imbernon, E. (2008) Quelle place pour les risques professionnels dans la santé publique? Sante Publique (Paris), 20, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.080.0009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giuffrida, A., Iunes, R. and Savedoff, W. (2001) Economic and Health Effects of Occupational Hazards in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacherjee, A., Chau, N., Sierra, C., Legras, B., Benamghar, L. and Michaely, J. (2003) Relationships of Job and Some Individual Characteristics to Occupational Injuries in Employed People: A Community-Based Study. Journal of Occupational Health, 45, 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.45.382</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahn, Y., Bena, J. and Bailer, A. (2004) Comparison of Unintentnional Fatal Occupational Injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States. Injury Prevention, 10, 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2003.004895</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alpaslan, T. and Kayihan, P. (2016) Trends in Occupational Injuries and Fatality in Turkey. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 22, 457-462.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eijkemans</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>Occupational Health Services as a Part of Primary Health Care</article-title><source> Asian-Pacific Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 51</fpage>-<lpage>53</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Labour Office (2001) Guidelines on Occupational Safety &amp; Health Management Systems. African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbutshu, L.H., Malonga, K.F., Ngatu, N.R., Kanbara, S., Longo-Mbenza, B. and Suganuma, N. (2014) Incidence and Predictors of Hand-Arm Musculoskeletal Complaints among Vibration-Exposed African Cassava and Corn Millers. Safety and Health at Work, 5, 131-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ILO (2011) Introductory Report: Global Trends and Challenges on Occupational Safety and Health. International Training Centre of the ILO, Turin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pavlic, M., Likar, A. and Pavlic, A. (2011) Managing Occupational Injuries Records in Slovenia from 1948 to 2008. Safety Science, 49, 834-842.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarfat, F. and Waser, A. (2013) Les risques professionnels et la santé: Une affaire d’expérience, d’occultation, de reconnaissance. Sociologies Pratiques, 1, 1-10.  
https://doi.org/10.3917/sopr.026.0001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BAB, Marie, J. and Dabire, V. (2019) République démocratique du Congo: Perspectives économiques en Afrique 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kholti, A.E.L., Orient, N.M., Maroc, L. and Maroc, L. (2003) Tout savoir sur la Journée mondiale de la sécurité et de la santé au travail Statistiques en termes d’accidents du travail: Couverture de santé au travail. 3-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Win, K.N., Trivedi, A., Lai, A., Hasylin, H. and Abdul-Mumin, K. (2021) Non-Fatal Occupational Accidents in Brunei Darussalam. Industrial Health, 59, 193-200.  
https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2020-0174</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ana Clara Dantas de Souza, D.L.B.S. and Barbosa, I.R. (2020) Prevalence of Occupational Accidents and Associated Variables in the Brazilian Workforce. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho, 18, 434-443.  
https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2020-578</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Menegon, L.S., Menegon, F.A., Maeno, M. and Kupek, E. (2021) Incidence and Time Trend of Occupational Accidents in the Textile and Clothing Industry: Analysis of Santa Catarina, Brazil, between 2008 and 2017. The Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 24, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720210005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vahabi, N., Kazemnejad, A. and Datta, S. (2017) Empirical Bayesian Geographical Mapping of Occupational Accidents among Iranian Workers. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 20, 302-307.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bezerra, J.C., Arantes, L.J., Shimizu, H.E., Merchán-Hamann, E. and Ramalho, W.M. (2020) Workers’ Health in Brazil: Accidents Recorded by Social Security from 2008 to 2014. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73, e20180892.  
https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0892</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanmiquel, L., Bascompta, M., Rossell, J.M., Anticoi, H.F. and Guash, E. (2018) Analysis of Occupational Accidents in Underground and Surface Mining in Spain Using Data-Mining Techniques. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030462</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malta, D.C., et al. (2017) Acidentes de trabalho autorreferidos pela popula&amp;atilde;o adulta Brasileira, segundo dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013. Ciência &amp; Saúde Coletiva, 22, 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017221.17862015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119251-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Izadi, N., Aminian, O. and Esmaeili, B. (2019) Occupational Accidents in Iran: Risk Factors and Long Term Trend (2007-2016). Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 19, 2005-2010.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>